Action Learning Briefing: Promise & Pitfalls
Jun 20, 2015
Action Learning Briefing:
Promise & Pitfalls
Action Learning: Promise & PitfallsObjectives
Review definitions & genesis Discuss why Action Learning & the Promise Review models plus typical content & design Know the pitfalls/success factors (lessons
learned) & some accelerators Review typical participant learnings
WORKING ON BUSINESS PROBLEMS IN TEAMS
FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES
Centerpiece: A real business problem or opportunity
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Action Learning Definition
WORKING ON (REAL, IMPORTANT) BUSINESS PROBLEMS
(OR OPPORTUNITIES) IN (DIVERSE, CROSS-ORGANIZATION) TEAMS
FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES(TO IMPROVE THE BUSINESS & DEVELOP
PARTICIPANTS)
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Expanded Action Learning Definition
What is Action Learning?A dynamic tool used to:
• Drive strategic change
• Transform the organization
• Accelerate development
• Achieve business breakthroughs
• Develop leadership capabilities
• etc.Develop participants
Address significantbusiness challenges
Working onauthentic, urgent business problems/opportunities in diverse, cross-organization teams to improve thebusiness and developparticipants
Results
Learning
Action
Action Learning Genesis
Not GE, American or new UK roots - 1945 Founding father - Reg Revans Rapid increase in use
© 20002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Primary Differences Between Action Learning & A Task Force
Explicit learning & development goals A significant education component A diverse team
Why Action Learning
Can be powerful Puts Executive Development “At the Table” Demonstrable impact Provides motivation to learn – not theoretical Easy to sell But…
Without effective program management & facilitation it can become
ActionLearning
But…
Action Learning
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Address significant business
challenges
Develop leadership, teaming & business tools, techniques &
skills
AL The Promise
Multiple potential benefits: Develop individual capabilities
Accelerated development Leadership, teaming & business skills
Develop organizational capabilities More innovative & entrepreneurial Cross-organization collaboration (without sacrificing
autonomy) Other
Important work gets done Building a sense of the total enterprise
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Action Learning Framework
Evaluation Implementation
Sponsors
ParticipantsTeams
Projects
RolesProgram
AL Typical Program Content
Work / business planning tools & techniques Innovation & entrepreneurship Team building - jump starting teams Project specific / JIT education Benchmarking Time management & delegation Senior executive dialog
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
AL Typical Design
©2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Session One Session Two
Project introduction & selection
Work planning tools & techniques
Team building Project specific / JIT
education Innovation &
entrepreneurship Set learning / develop-
ment goals Test project work plan
Mid-point progress review
Assimilate & synthesize work
Create, test & improve presentations• What learned? • Findings &
recommendations• Implementation plan
Presentations to spon- sors
Debriefing & planning next steps
3 - 6 Month Timeline
3 - 5 Days 2 - 3 Days
1 ½ Days
Teams do projects
Team Structure Example
Team 18
Participants
Action Learning Program – 24-32 Participants
Team 28
Participants
Team 38
Participants
Team 48
Participants
Sponsor Sponsor Sponsor Sponsor
AL Team & WorkshopMake-Up Options All experts. No experts. Stakeholder(s) Implementers Max - mix One big team or multiple teams Team size Recommend: approx. 3 teams, on 3 different projects Recommend: Sponsor selects 1-2 “implementers” for the
team. Max-Mix criteria set. Participants select projects based on interest and learning potential
Team leadership
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Participant Selection and Time ExpectationsHow should participants be selected? Based on potential? What they can learn, or need to learn? What they can contribute?
Time expectations: 25% or so in typical design How manage their real job? How manage their manager expectations? Full time for several weeks instead?
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
AL Sources of Projects
Participants Program, e.g., projects to implement agendas
created Strategic plan & challenges Sponsors Assessments/surveys Top management slate Key question: Provide choice or assign?
Implications for: Ownership, commitment, implementation
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Strategic Challenge Choices Start with the Business Context
Consider the Context of the Business Situation
Select Challenges
Clarif y Stretch Goals f or the Business
Defi ne “From-To” Challenges
I dentif y the Key I nitiatives
Assess Leadership Learning Needed
STRATEGI C CHALLENGE POSSI BILITIES
Project Selection Criteria
Linked to strategy: directly address marketplace challenges, operating priorities, performance
Promotes desired change or new capabilities Broad enough to be challenging but focused enough to
allow solution (avoid world hunger) Not too political Not redundant with other initiatives (unless parallel efforts
seen as desirable for innovation) Appropriate for level of participant Requires participants to think/act differently Exciting and challenging to participants A passionate sponsor with implementation authority Within business line or cross business?
Action Learning Project Examples
Initiated decision to make major acquisition Created a new leadership institute Designed and launched global supply chain development
initiative Designed a collaborative process for long-term strategic vision
development and deployment Reorganized multiple country and regional operations to
maximize efficiency, enhance productivity, and speed growth Introduced initiatives to build knowledge management,
globalization of operations Developed new product management process Created a process for attracting and retaining technology partners Recommended improved strategic utilization of an acquisition
Sponsorship
An effective sponsor makes the connection between achieving the project goal and the development goals
Drives commitment through public and private support Ongoing coaching and constructive feedback to teams Emphasizes action and learning
Models and reinforces desired leadership behaviors Provides “air cover” for the team Supports members with their managers (often is a level
above their manager) Ensures implementation of the approved recommendations Provides whatever extraordinary resources are needed Keeps the team on target Attends all face-to-face events
AL Common Pitfalls & Perils(Lessons Learned) No feedback/communications on what action was
taken Scope too large Not aligned with strategy Political land mines “Action” overwhelms “learning” Just another task force Lukewarm, arms-length sponsor(s) Workload & boss interference No implementation, or ineffective handoffs A hammer looking for something to nail
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
AL Critical Success Factors(Lessons Learned) Challenging but doable project Active top management involvement Trained, passionate sponsors with implementation
authority Balance “action” & “learning” Explicit learning goals & frequent debriefings Facilitation Implementation planned up-front Communicating progress & results Realistic expectations – success defined
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Action Learning Accelerators
On-line communications / work system Sponsors get coached Team process coaches Access to faculty / consultants Use graduates in future classes Peer feedback Sponsors involved in selecting some team
members Managers get coached
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
Balancing Action & Learning
Make it explicit program objective, = importance
Set specific learning/development goals (individual & team)
Review progress at all project reviews Include in all presentations Build in reflection time Team coaches/consultants After Action Review
AL Decision Options
No decisions made, recommendations only Made in program by senior management Made outside the program
Implement within area of responsibility Teams find the decision makers and sell Other people implement
Plan for implementation upfront Sponsors select some team members with
implementation in mind Make implementation part of the program design
© 2002 Executive Development Associates. All rights reserved.
What AL Participants Typically Learn Entrepreneurial mindset & skills To create, test & sell a business plan The power of cross-business teaming (to work
collaboratively across boundaries) Accelerated problem solving & decision making How to overcome the immune system More about the total business & a sense of engagement How to jump-start new teams To appreciate & leverage differences Giving & getting feedback To manage their time & delegate That shared leadership can work
Action Learning – Keeping it In Perspective – The Strategic Challenges are for Learning
“I am far less interested in people having the right answer than in their thinking about issues the right way. What criteria do they use? Why do they think the way they do? What alternatives have they considered? What premises do they have?”
Harvey Golub, former CEO American Express
Action Learning – Another Design
Creating & Testing Project Business PlansCreating & Testing
Project Business PlansLeadership CapabilitiesLeadership Capabilities
Implementing Approved Project
Business Plans
Implementing Approved Project
Business Plans
Learning & practicing leadership capabilities
Confidential feed- back & development planning on 360 Leadership Inventory
Preparation for business project process
Reviewing marketplace realities
Setting & reviewing learning / development goals
Building project teams Developing, testing &
presenting project business plans
Approving or rejecting projects
Business project implementation
Debriefing individual & team learning vis-a-vis development goals
Summarizing & presenting results
After Action Review Forming self-directed
development teams
SEGMENT ONE SEGMENT TWO SEGMENT THREE
Three Days Four Weeks Three Months
On-line Work & Communication ThroughoutExecutive Coaches