cQuestion 1 0 out of 1 points Jason, an architect, is the sole shareholder of Purple Corporation, a personal service corporation. The corporation paid Jason a salary of $120,000 during its fiscal year ending November 30, 2010. How much salary must Purple pay Jason during the period December 1 through December 31, 2010, to permit the corporation to continue to use its fiscal year without negative tax effects? Answer Selected Answer: $110,000 Response Feedback: The salary for the deferral period. Question 2 1 out of 1 points Ted is the sole shareholder of a C corporation, and Sue owns a sole proprietorship. Both businesses were started in 2010, and each business sustained a $5,000 net capital loss for the year. Which of the following statements is correct? Answer Selected Answer: Ted's corporation can't deduct the $5,000 capital loss in 2010. Response Feedback: A corporation can't deduct a net capital loss in the year incorrect (option b). Individuals cannot carry back net capital losses (option c.), and can deduct net capital losses against ordinary income only to the extent of $3,000 in any year (option d.) Question 3 1 out of 1 points A technical advice memorandum is issued by: Answer Selected Answer: National Office of the IRS Response Feedback: The IRS issues the technical advice memorandum Question 4 0 out of 1 points Elk, a C corporation, has $500,000 operating income and $350,000 operating expenses during the year. In addition, Elk has a $20,000 long-term capital gain and a $52,000 short-term capital loss. Elk's taxable income is: Answer Selected Answer: $118,000 Response Feedback: $500,000 (operating income) - $350,000 (operating income) + $20,000 (LTCG) - $20,000 (STCL) = $150,000 taxable income. A corporation cannot deduct a net capital loss in the year incurred. The net capital loss ($32,000) can be carried back three years and offset against capital gain in the carryback years. If the capital loss is not used in the carryback, it can be carried forward five years. Capital gains of corporations are included in taxable income and are not subject to the favorable rates applicable to individuals. Question 5 1 out of 1 points Which of the following statements is incorrect about the check-the-box Regulations? Answer Selected
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
cQuestion 1
0 out of 1 points
Jason, an architect, is the sole shareholder of Purple Corporation, a personal service corporation. The corporation paid
Jason a salary of $120,000 during its fiscal year ending November 30, 2010. How much salary must Purple pay Jason
during the period December 1 through December 31, 2010, to permit the corporation to continue to use its fiscal year
without negative tax effects?
Answer
Selected Answer:
$110,000
Response Feedback: The salary for the deferral period.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Ted is the sole shareholder of a C corporation, and Sue owns a sole proprietorship. Both businesses were started in
2010, and each business sustained a $5,000 net capital loss for the year. Which of the following statements is correct?
Answer
Selected Answer:
Ted's corporation can't deduct the $5,000 capital loss in 2010.
Response
Feedback:
A corporation can't deduct a net capital loss in the year incorrect (option b). Individuals cannot carry
back net capital losses (option c.), and can deduct net capital losses against ordinary income only to
the extent of $3,000 in any year (option d.)
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
A technical advice memorandum is issued by:
Answer
Selected Answer:
National Office of the IRS
Response Feedback: The IRS issues the technical advice memorandum
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Elk, a C corporation, has $500,000 operating income and $350,000 operating expenses during the year. In addition,
Elk has a $20,000 long-term capital gain and a $52,000 short-term capital loss. Elk's taxable income is:
(STCL) = $150,000 taxable income. A corporation cannot deduct a net capital loss in the year
incurred. The net capital loss ($32,000) can be carried back three years and offset against capital
gain in the carryback years. If the capital loss is not used in the carryback, it can be carried
forward five years. Capital gains of corporations are included in taxable income and are not
subject to the favorable rates applicable to individuals.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Jason, an architect, is the sole shareholder of Purple Corporation, a personal service corporation. The
corporation paid Jason a salary of $120,000 during its fiscal year ending November 30, 2010. How much
salary must Purple pay Jason during the period December 1 through December 31, 2010, to permit the
corporation to continue to use its fiscal year without negative tax effects? Answer
Selected Answer:
$10,000
Response Feedback: The salary for the deferral period.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Bjorn owns a 35% interest in an S corporation that earned $200,000 in 2010. He also owns 10% of the stock
in a C corporation that earned $200,000 during the year. The S corporation distributed $10,000 to Bjorn and
the C corporation paid dividends of $10,000 to Bjorn. How much income must Bjorn report from these
businesses? Answer
Selected
Answer:
$70,000 income from the S corporation and $10,000 of dividend income from the C
corporation.
Response
Feedback: Bjorn must report his $70,000 share ($200,000 ? 35%) of the S corporation's income on his
individual tax return. He will report $10,000 of dividend income from the C corporation.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Glen and Michael are equal partners in Trout Enterprises, a calendar year partnership. During the year, Trout
Enterprises had gross income of $400,000 and operating expenses of $220,000. In addition, the partnership
sold land that had been held for investment purposes for a long-term capital gain of $100,000. During the
year, Glen withdrew $60,000 from the partnership, and Michael withdrew $60,000. Discuss the impact of
this information on the taxable income of Trout, Glen, and Michael. Answer
Selected
Answer:
Trout pays tax on $0 income, Glen's taxable income increases by $140,000, and Michael's
taxable income increases by $140,000.
Response
Feedback: Trout, a partnership, is not a taxpaying entity. Its profit (loss) and separate items flow through to
the partners. The partnership's Form 1065 reports ordinary business income of $180,000
($400,000 income - $220,000 expenses). The partnership also reports the $100,000 long-term
capital gain as a separately stated item on Form 1065. Glen and Michael both receive a
Schedule K-1 reporting ordinary business income of $90,000 and separately stated long-term
capital gain of $50,000. Each partner reports ordinary business income of $90,000 and long-
term capital gain of $50,000 on his own return. The withdrawals do not affect taxable income
for the partners but decrease their basis in the partnership.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements does not reflect the rules regarding pass-through entities and DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
The entity allocates to each owner his or her share of any QPAI.
Response
Feedback: Guaranteed payments do not count as wages (choice c), but a partner can count other W-2
wages paid (choice c).
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Bacon Corporation manufactures an exercise machine at a cost of $800 and sells the machine to Kirby
Corporation for $1,000 in 2010. Kirby incurs TV advertising expenses of $300 and sells the machine by
phone order for $1,700. If Bacon and Kirby corporations are members of an expanded affiliated group
(EAG), their QPAI is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$600
Response Feedback: QPAI is $600 ($1,700 - $800 - $300).
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
Yvonne Corporation manufactures and sells ceramic dinnerware. The company also sells dinnerware that is
purchased from unrelated foreign producers. During tax year 2010, Yvonne had a U. S. profit of $1.2 million
(QPAI) and a loss from the imported merchandise of $100,000. What is Yvonne's DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
$66,000
Response Feedback: $99,000 (9% x $1.1 million). The taxable income limitation applies.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Lemon, Inc., has taxable income of $13 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$273,000
Response Feedback: $13 million x 9% x 35% = $409,500
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
Julie's sole proprietorship consists of a bakery and retail food sales. The bakery's DPGR is $700,000, but
after CGS, direct expenses, and a ratable portion of indirect expenses are deducted, QPAI is $100,000. W-2
wages related to DPGR are significant. The retail food sales have a loss of $1 million. If Julie files a joint
return and her modified AGI is $119,500, what is her allowable DPAD, if any, for 2010? Answer
Selected Answer:
$6,000
Response Feedback: $100,000 QPAI x 9% = $9,000
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Eileen transfers property worth $200,000 (basis of $60,000) to Goldfinch Corporation. In return, she receives
80% of the stock in Goldfinch Corporation (fair market value of $180,000) and a long-term note (fair market
value of $20,000) executed by Goldfinch and made payable to Eileen. Eileen recognizes gain on the transfer
of: Answer
Selected Answer:
$140,000
Response
Feedback: The long-term obligation of Goldfinch Corporation constitutes boot. Thus, Eileen receives
boot in the amount of $20,000 and will recognize gain to that extent.
Question 7
0 out of 1 points
Tara incorporates her sole proprietorship, transferring it to newly formed Black Corporation. The assets
transferred have an adjusted basis of $240,000 and a fair market value of $300,000. Also transferred was
$10,000 in liabilities, $1,000 of which was personal and the balance of $9,000 being business related. In
return for these transfers, Tara receives all of the stock in Black Corporation. Answer
Selected Answer:
Black Corporation has a basis of $240,000 in the property.
Response
Feedback: Tara has a recognized gain of $10,000 that is the amount of the boot she is treated as having
received. Thus, her basis in the Black Corporation stock is $240,000 [$240,000 (basis of the
property given up) - $10,000 (boot received) + $10,000 (gain recognized)]. Black Corporation's
basis in the property is $250,000 [$240,000 (Tara's basis in the property) + $10,000 (gain
recognized by Tara)]. In terms of the $10,000 boot, § 357(b) taints all liabilities even though
some are supported by a bona fide business purpose.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Eve transfers property (basis of $120,000 and fair market value of $400,000) to Green Corporation for 80%
of its stock (worth $350,000) and a long-term note (worth $50,000), executed by Green Corporation and
made payable to Eve. As a result of the transfer: Answer
Selected Answer:
Eve recognizes a gain of $230,000.
Response Feedback: A long-term note is treated as “boot.” Thus, Eve is taxed on the value of the note received.
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
Kim owns 100% of the stock of Cardinal Corporation. In the current year Kim transfers an installment
obligation, tax basis of $30,000 and fair market value of $200,000, for additional stock in Cardinal worth
$200,000. Answer
Selected Answer:
Kim has a basis of $200,000 in the additional stock she received in Cardinal Corporation.
Response
Feedback: An installment obligation qualifies as "property" under § 351. Thus, Kim recognizes no gain
on the transfer. Cardinal has a basis of $30,000 in the installment obligation.
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Sarah and Tony (mother and son) form Dove Corporation with the following investments: cash by Sarah of
$55,000; land by Tony (basis of $35,000 and fair market value of $45,000). Dove Corporation issues 200
shares of stock, 100 each to Sarah and Tony. Thus, each receives stock in Dove worth $50,000. Answer
Selected Answer:
As a result of the transfer, Tony recognizes a gain of $10,000.
Response
Feedback: The fact that the stock was not in proportion to the value of the property transferred (choice a.)
does not prevent § 351 from applying. Since § 351 applies and no boot was received, Tony does
not recognize a gain (choice b.). His basis in the stock is $35,000 plus $5,000, the basis of the
stock implicitly gifted by Sarah to Tony (not $50,000 as in choice c.).
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Julie's sole proprietorship consists of a bakery and retail food sales. The bakery's DPGR is $700,000, but
after CGS, direct expenses, and a ratable portion of indirect expenses are deducted, QPAI is $100,000. W-2
wages related to DPGR are significant. The retail food sales have a loss of $1 million. If Julie files a joint
return and her modified AGI is $119,500, what is her allowable DPAD, if any, for 2010? Answer
Selected Answer:
$9,000
Response Feedback: $100,000 QPAI x 9% = $9,000
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Tara incorporates her sole proprietorship, transferring it to newly formed Black Corporation. The assets
transferred have an adjusted basis of $240,000 and a fair market value of $300,000. Also transferred was
$10,000 in liabilities, $1,000 of which was personal and the balance of $9,000 being business related. In
return for these transfers, Tara receives all of the stock in Black Corporation. Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Tara has a recognized gain of $10,000 that is the amount of the boot she is treated as having
received. Thus, her basis in the Black Corporation stock is $240,000 [$240,000 (basis of the
property given up) - $10,000 (boot received) + $10,000 (gain recognized)]. Black Corporation's
basis in the property is $250,000 [$240,000 (Tara's basis in the property) + $10,000 (gain
recognized by Tara)]. In terms of the $10,000 boot, § 357(b) taints all liabilities even though
some are supported by a bona fide business purpose.
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements does not reflect the rules regarding pass-through entities and DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
In the case of partnerships, guaranteed payments are not regarded as W-2 wages.
Response
Feedback: Guaranteed payments do not count as wages (choice c), but a partner can count other W-2
wages paid (choice c).
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Eileen transfers property worth $200,000 (basis of $60,000) to Goldfinch Corporation. In return, she receives
80% of the stock in Goldfinch Corporation (fair market value of $180,000) and a long-term note (fair market
value of $20,000) executed by Goldfinch and made payable to Eileen. Eileen recognizes gain on the transfer
of: Answer
Selected Answer:
$20,000
Response
Feedback: The long-term obligation of Goldfinch Corporation constitutes boot. Thus, Eileen receives
boot in the amount of $20,000 and will recognize gain to that extent.
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
Jane and Walt form Yellow Corporation. Jane transfers equipment worth $950,000 (basis of $200,000) and
cash of $50,000 to Yellow Corporation for 50% of its stock. Walt transfers a building and land worth
$1,050,000 (basis of $400,000) for 50% of Yellow's stock and $50,000 cash. Answer
Selected Answer:
Jane recognizes a gain of $750,000; Walt recognizes a gain of $650,000.
Response
Feedback: Walt's realized gain of $650,000 is recognized to the extent of the $50,000 of "boot"
received.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Kim owns 100% of the stock of Cardinal Corporation. In the current year Kim transfers an installment
obligation, tax basis of $30,000 and fair market value of $200,000, for additional stock in Cardinal worth
$200,000. Answer
Selected Answer:
Kim recognizes no taxable gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: An installment obligation qualifies as "property" under § 351. Thus, Kim recognizes no gain
on the transfer. Cardinal has a basis of $30,000 in the installment obligation.
Question 7
0 out of 1 points
Erica transfers land worth $500,000, basis of $100,000, to a newly formed corporation, Robin Corporation,
for all of Robin's stock, worth $300,000, and a 10-year note. The note was executed by Robin and made
payable to Erica in the amount of $200,000. As a result of the transfer: Answer
Selected Answer:
Erica recognizes gain of $400,000.
Response
Feedback: Erica has a recognized gain of $200,000 which is the amount of the boot she is treated as having
received through her receipt of the securities in Robin Corporation. The basis of the land to
Robin would be equal to the basis Erica had in the land, $100,000, plus the gain recognized by
Erica, $200,000, or $300,000.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Which statement is false? Answer
Selected Answer:
The DPAD is not limited to C corporations.
Response Feedback: This is not a deduction from adjusted gross income for a sole proprietor.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Lemon, Inc., has taxable income of $13 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$409,500
Response Feedback: $13 million x 9% x 35% = $409,500
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Maria Corporation manufactures and sells ceramic dinnerware. The company also sells dinnerware that is
purchased from unrelated foreign producers. During the tax year 2010, Maria had a U.S. profit of $1.2
million (QPAI) and a profit from the imported merchandise of $100,000. What is Maria's DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
$72,000
Response Feedback: $108,000 (9% x $1.2 million). The $100,000 profit from the imported goods is not QPAI.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Sarah and Emily form Red Corporation with the following investments: Sarah transfers computers worth
$200,000 (basis of $80,000), while Emily transfers real estate worth $180,000 (basis of $40,000) and
services (worth $20,000) rendered in organizing the corporation. Each is issued 600 shares in Red
Corporation. With respect to the transfers: Answer
Selected Answer:
Red Corporation has a basis of $60,000 in the real estate.
Response
Feedback: Sarah has no recognized gain and Emily recognizes income of $20,000 representing the stock
received for services rendered. Red Corporation has a basis of $80,000 in the computers and
$40,000 in the real estate. Emily has a basis of $60,000 in the stock [$40,000 (basis of real
estate) + $20,000 (income recognized from services rendered)].
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Maria Corporation manufactures and sells ceramic dinnerware. The company also sells dinnerware that is
purchased from unrelated foreign producers. During the tax year 2010, Maria had a U.S. profit of $1.2
million (QPAI) and a profit from the imported merchandise of $100,000. What is Maria's DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
$108,000
Response Feedback: $108,000 (9% x $1.2 million). The $100,000 profit from the imported goods is not QPAI.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Eileen transfers property worth $200,000 (basis of $60,000) to Goldfinch Corporation. In return, she receives
80% of the stock in Goldfinch Corporation (fair market value of $180,000) and a long-term note (fair market
value of $20,000) executed by Goldfinch and made payable to Eileen. Eileen recognizes gain on the transfer
of: Answer
Selected Answer:
$20,000
Response
Feedback: The long-term obligation of Goldfinch Corporation constitutes boot. Thus, Eileen receives
boot in the amount of $20,000 and will recognize gain to that extent.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements does not reflect the rules regarding pass-through entities and DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
In the case of partnerships, guaranteed payments are not regarded as W-2 wages.
Response
Feedback: Guaranteed payments do not count as wages (choice c), but a partner can count other W-2
wages paid (choice c).
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
Sarah and Tony (mother and son) form Dove Corporation with the following investments: cash by Sarah of
$55,000; land by Tony (basis of $35,000 and fair market value of $45,000). Dove Corporation issues 200
shares of stock, 100 each to Sarah and Tony. Thus, each receives stock in Dove worth $50,000. Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: The fact that the stock was not in proportion to the value of the property transferred (choice a.)
does not prevent § 351 from applying. Since § 351 applies and no boot was received, Tony does
not recognize a gain (choice b.). His basis in the stock is $35,000 plus $5,000, the basis of the
stock implicitly gifted by Sarah to Tony (not $50,000 as in choice c.).
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Kim owns 100% of the stock of Cardinal Corporation. In the current year Kim transfers an installment
obligation, tax basis of $30,000 and fair market value of $200,000, for additional stock in Cardinal worth
$200,000. Answer
Selected Answer:
Kim recognizes no taxable gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: An installment obligation qualifies as "property" under § 351. Thus, Kim recognizes no gain
on the transfer. Cardinal has a basis of $30,000 in the installment obligation.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Julie's sole proprietorship consists of a bakery and retail food sales. The bakery's DPGR is $700,000, but
after CGS, direct expenses, and a ratable portion of indirect expenses are deducted, QPAI is $100,000. W-2
wages related to DPGR are significant. The retail food sales have a loss of $1 million. If Julie files a joint
return and her modified AGI is $119,500, what is her allowable DPAD, if any, for 2010? Answer
Selected Answer:
$9,000
Response Feedback: $100,000 QPAI x 9% = $9,000
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Yvonne Corporation manufactures and sells ceramic dinnerware. The company also sells dinnerware that is
purchased from unrelated foreign producers. During tax year 2010, Yvonne had a U. S. profit of $1.2 million
(QPAI) and a loss from the imported merchandise of $100,000. What is Yvonne's DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
$99,000
Response Feedback: $99,000 (9% x $1.1 million). The taxable income limitation applies.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Tara incorporates her sole proprietorship, transferring it to newly formed Black Corporation. The assets
transferred have an adjusted basis of $240,000 and a fair market value of $300,000. Also transferred was
$10,000 in liabilities, $1,000 of which was personal and the balance of $9,000 being business related. In
return for these transfers, Tara receives all of the stock in Black Corporation. Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Tara has a recognized gain of $10,000 that is the amount of the boot she is treated as having
received. Thus, her basis in the Black Corporation stock is $240,000 [$240,000 (basis of the
property given up) - $10,000 (boot received) + $10,000 (gain recognized)]. Black Corporation's
basis in the property is $250,000 [$240,000 (Tara's basis in the property) + $10,000 (gain
recognized by Tara)]. In terms of the $10,000 boot, § 357(b) taints all liabilities even though
some are supported by a bona fide business purpose.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Bacon Corporation manufactures an exercise machine at a cost of $800 and sells the machine to Kirby
Corporation for $1,000 in 2010. Kirby incurs TV advertising expenses of $300 and sells the machine by
phone order for $1,700. If Bacon and Kirby corporations are members of an expanded affiliated group
(EAG), their QPAI is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$600
Response Feedback: QPAI is $600 ($1,700 - $800 - $300).
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Sarah and Emily form Red Corporation with the following investments: Sarah transfers computers worth
$200,000 (basis of $80,000), while Emily transfers real estate worth $180,000 (basis of $40,000) and
services (worth $20,000) rendered in organizing the corporation. Each is issued 600 shares in Red
Corporation. With respect to the transfers: Answer
Selected Answer:
Emily has a basis of $60,000 in the shares of Red Corporation.
Response
Feedback: Sarah has no recognized gain and Emily recognizes income of $20,000 representing the stock
received for services rendered. Red Corporation has a basis of $80,000 in the computers and
$40,000 in the real estate. Emily has a basis of $60,000 in the stock [$40,000 (basis of real
estate) + $20,000 (income recognized from services rendered)].
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Julie's sole proprietorship consists of a bakery and retail food sales. The bakery's DPGR is $700,000, but
after CGS, direct expenses, and a ratable portion of indirect expenses are deducted, QPAI is $100,000. W-2
wages related to DPGR are significant. The retail food sales have a loss of $1 million. If Julie files a joint
return and her modified AGI is $119,500, what is her allowable DPAD, if any, for 2010? Answer
Selected Answer:
$9,000
Response Feedback: $100,000 QPAI x 9% = $9,000
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Which statement is false? Answer
Selected Answer:
In the case of a sole proprietor, the DPAD is a deduction from adjusted gross income.
Response Feedback: This is not a deduction from adjusted gross income for a sole proprietor.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements does not reflect the rules regarding pass-through entities and DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Guaranteed payments do not count as wages (choice c), but a partner can count other W-2
wages paid (choice c).
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Erica transfers land worth $500,000, basis of $100,000, to a newly formed corporation, Robin Corporation,
for all of Robin's stock, worth $300,000, and a 10-year note. The note was executed by Robin and made
payable to Erica in the amount of $200,000. As a result of the transfer: Answer
Selected Answer:
Robin Corporation has a basis of $300,000 in the land.
Response
Feedback: Erica has a recognized gain of $200,000 which is the amount of the boot she is treated as having
received through her receipt of the securities in Robin Corporation. The basis of the land to
Robin would be equal to the basis Erica had in the land, $100,000, plus the gain recognized by
Erica, $200,000, or $300,000.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Tara incorporates her sole proprietorship, transferring it to newly formed Black Corporation. The assets
transferred have an adjusted basis of $240,000 and a fair market value of $300,000. Also transferred was
$10,000 in liabilities, $1,000 of which was personal and the balance of $9,000 being business related. In
return for these transfers, Tara receives all of the stock in Black Corporation. Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Tara has a recognized gain of $10,000 that is the amount of the boot she is treated as having
received. Thus, her basis in the Black Corporation stock is $240,000 [$240,000 (basis of the
property given up) - $10,000 (boot received) + $10,000 (gain recognized)]. Black Corporation's
basis in the property is $250,000 [$240,000 (Tara's basis in the property) + $10,000 (gain
recognized by Tara)]. In terms of the $10,000 boot, § 357(b) taints all liabilities even though
some are supported by a bona fide business purpose.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Kim owns 100% of the stock of Cardinal Corporation. In the current year Kim transfers an installment
obligation, tax basis of $30,000 and fair market value of $200,000, for additional stock in Cardinal worth
$200,000. Answer
Selected Answer:
Kim recognizes no taxable gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: An installment obligation qualifies as "property" under § 351. Thus, Kim recognizes no gain
on the transfer. Cardinal has a basis of $30,000 in the installment obligation.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Sarah and Tony (mother and son) form Dove Corporation with the following investments: cash by Sarah of
$55,000; land by Tony (basis of $35,000 and fair market value of $45,000). Dove Corporation issues 200
shares of stock, 100 each to Sarah and Tony. Thus, each receives stock in Dove worth $50,000. Answer
Selected
Answer:
Section 351 may apply because stock need not be issued to Sarah and Tony in proportion to
the value of the property transferred.
Response
Feedback: The fact that the stock was not in proportion to the value of the property transferred (choice a.)
does not prevent § 351 from applying. Since § 351 applies and no boot was received, Tony does
not recognize a gain (choice b.). His basis in the stock is $35,000 plus $5,000, the basis of the
stock implicitly gifted by Sarah to Tony (not $50,000 as in choice c.).
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Bacon Corporation manufactures an exercise machine at a cost of $800 and sells the machine to Kirby
Corporation for $1,000 in 2010. Kirby incurs TV advertising expenses of $300 and sells the machine by
phone order for $1,700. If Bacon and Kirby corporations are members of an expanded affiliated group
(EAG), their QPAI is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$600
Response Feedback: QPAI is $600 ($1,700 - $800 - $300).
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Eve transfers property (basis of $120,000 and fair market value of $400,000) to Green Corporation for 80%
of its stock (worth $350,000) and a long-term note (worth $50,000), executed by Green Corporation and
made payable to Eve. As a result of the transfer: Answer
Selected Answer:
Eve recognizes a gain of $50,000.
Response Feedback: A long-term note is treated as “boot.” Thus, Eve is taxed on the value of the note received.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Crow Corporation has 800 shares of stock outstanding. Ted owns 300 shares, Ted's mother owns 100 shares,
Ted's sister owns 80 shares, and Ted's granddaughter owns 120 shares. Bluebird Corporation owns the
remaining 200 shares of stock in Crow. Ted owns 30% of the stock in Bluebird Corporation. In applying the
§ 318 stock attribution rules, how many shares does Ted own in Crow Corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
300
Response
Feedback: Ted owns 520 shares, 300 shares directly and 220 shares constructively, in Crow Corporation.
Ted owns the shares of his mother (100 shares) and his granddaughter (120 shares). Ted is not
deemed to own the stock of his sister or Bluebird Corporation (in which he owns less than
50%).
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
Currently, Brown Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. Pat owns
300 shares. His wife owns 300 shares, his daughter owns 200 shares, and his father owns 200 shares. Two
years ago, Pat transferred $50,000 to Brown Corporation in exchange for 100 newly issued shares of
nonvoting preferred stock. In the current year, Brown Corporation redeems Pat's preferred stock for $60,000,
its fair market value. With respect to the distribution in redemption of the preferred stock: Answer
Selected Answer:
Pat has a long-term capital gain of $60,000.
Response
Feedback: As a result of the stock attribution rules, Pat owns 100% of the stock in Brown Corporation
before and after the redemption. Thus, the distribution does not satisfy any of the qualifying
stock redemption provisions. Instead, the entire distribution is taxed as dividend income. The
$50,000 basis in the preferred stock redeemed attaches to the basis of Pat's common stock.
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
Orange Corporation distributes property worth $300,000, basis of $340,000, to a shareholder in a distribution
that is a qualifying stock redemption. The property is subject to a liability of $110,000, which the
shareholder assumes. The basis of the property to the shareholder is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$230,000
Response
Feedback: The shareholder's basis in property received in a qualifying stock redemption is the fair
market value of the property.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Hazel, Emily, and Frank, unrelated individuals, own all of the stock in Wren Corporation (E & P of
$900,000) as follows: Hazel, 250 shares; Emily, 250 shares; and Frank, 1,000 shares. Wren redeems 400 of
Frank's shares (basis of $40,000) for $200,000. With respect to the distribution in redemption of the stock: Answer
Selected Answer:
Frank has dividend income of $160,000.
Response
Feedback: The distribution does not satisfy any of the qualifying stock redemption provisions and, as such,
is taxed as dividend income. Frank's ownership interest in Wren Corporation after the
redemption is 54.5% (600 shares owned after redemption ÷ 1,100 shares outstanding after
redemption). Since he continues to control Wren Corporation after the redemption, the
transaction fails both the not essentially equivalent redemption provision and the
disproportionate redemption provision. The $40,000 basis in the stock redeemed attaches to that
of Frank's remaining stock in Wren.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Hawk Corporation has 300 shares of stock outstanding: Marina owns 60 shares, Kent owns 90 shares, and
Tom owns 75 shares. Blackbird Partnership owns the remaining 75 shares of stock in Hawk Corporation.
Marina, Kent, and Tom, all unrelated, are equal partners of Blackbird Partnership. With respect to the stock
attribution rules under § 318: Answer
Selected Answer:
Marina owns, directly and indirectly, 85 shares in Hawk Corporation.
Response
Feedback: A partner is deemed to own stock held by the partnership in proportion to the partner's interest
in the partnership. Thus, Marina owns 85 shares in Hawk Corporation [60 shares directly plus
25 shares indirectly from Blackbird Partnership (1/3 ? 75 shares)]. Similarly, Kent owns 115
shares (90 shares directly plus 25 shares indirectly) and Tom owns 100 shares (75 shares
directly plus 25 shares indirectly) in Hawk Corporation. A partnership is deemed to own all of
the stock owned by its partners; thus, Blackbird Partnership owns all 300 shares in Hawk (75
shares directly plus 225 shares indirectly from the three partners).
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Blue Corporation, a cash basis taxpayer, has taxable income of $700,000 for the current year. Blue elected
$80,000 of § 179 expense. It also had a related party loss of $30,000 and a realized (not recognized) gain
from an involuntary conversion of $85,000. It paid Federal income tax of $185,000 and a nondeductible fine
of $20,000. Blue's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$630,000
Response
Feedback: Taxable income is reduced by Federal income tax paid, the related party loss, and the
nondeductible fine. Eighty percent of the § 179 expense is added back. Thus, $700,000 -
$185,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 + $64,000 = $529,000. The involuntary conversion has no effect
since realized gain was not recognized.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Brenda owns 900 shares of Eagle Corporation stock at a time when Eagle has 1,500 shares of stock
outstanding. The remaining shareholders are unrelated to Brenda. What is the minimum number of shares
Eagle must redeem from Brenda so that the transaction will qualify as a disproportionate redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
347 shares
Response
Feedback: Before the redemption, Brenda owns 60% of the outstanding shares of Eagle stock. To qualify
as a disproportionate redemption, Brenda must own, after the redemption, less than 48% (80% ?
60%) of the remaining outstanding shares of Eagle stock. Using a simple algebraic formula, the
minimum number of shares (rounded up to the next whole number) that must be redeemed is
347 shares.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Pheasant Corporation ended its first year of operations with taxable income of $225,000. At the time of
Pheasant's formation, it incurred $50,000 of organizational expenses. In calculating its taxable income for
the year, Pheasant claimed an $8,000 deduction for the organizational expenses. What is Pheasant's current E
& P? Answer
Selected Answer:
$225,000
Response
Feedback: In determining E & P, there is no allowance for the amortization of organizational expenses.
Any such expense deducted when computing taxable income must be added back to determine
E & P. Consequently, Pheasant's E & P is $233,000 ($225,000 of current year E & P plus
$8,000 of organizational expenses).
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
Five years ago, Eleanor transferred property she had used in her sole proprietorship to Blue Corporation for
1,000 shares of Blue Corporation in a transaction that qualified under § 351. The assets had a tax basis to her
of $300,000 and a fair market value of $450,000 on the date of the transfer. In the current year, Blue
Corporation (E & P of $600,000) redeems 200 shares from Eleanor for $190,000 in a transaction that does
not qualify for sale or exchange treatment. With respect to the redemption, Eleanor will have a: Answer
Selected Answer:
$130,000 dividend
Response
Feedback: The transaction is treated as a return from her investment, and she has dividend income to
the extent of the entire distribution.
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Kingbird Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding. That stock is held by
Amata (550 shares) and Esteban (450 shares), who are unrelated individuals. Kingbird redeems 200 of
Amata's shares for $1,000 per share. Amata paid $300 per share for her Kingbird stock nine years ago.
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the stock redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
Amata's basis in her remaining 350 shares is $60,000.
Response
Feedback: The transaction qualifies for sale or exchange treatment as a disproportionate redemption.
Amata's 43.8% (350 shares ÷ 800 shares) postredemption interest in Kingbird is less than both
80% of her preredemption interest [43.8% < 44% (80% ? 550 shares ÷ 1,000 shares) and 50%.
The stock was held for more than one year; thus, the result is a long-term capital gain of
$140,000 [$200,000 (amount realized) - $60,000 (basis of 200 shares redeemed)]. The basis of
Amata's remaining shares is $105,000 (350 shares ? $300). The reduction in Kingbird's E & P
as a result of the qualifying stock redemption is limited to $160,000 [20% (percentage of shares
outstanding redeemed)? $800,000 (E & P at time of redemption)].
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Hazel, Emily, and Frank, unrelated individuals, own all of the stock in Wren Corporation (E & P of
$900,000) as follows: Hazel, 250 shares; Emily, 250 shares; and Frank, 1,000 shares. Wren redeems 400 of
Frank's shares (basis of $40,000) for $200,000. With respect to the distribution in redemption of the stock: Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: The distribution does not satisfy any of the qualifying stock redemption provisions and, as such,
is taxed as dividend income. Frank's ownership interest in Wren Corporation after the
redemption is 54.5% (600 shares owned after redemption ÷ 1,100 shares outstanding after
redemption). Since he continues to control Wren Corporation after the redemption, the
transaction fails both the not essentially equivalent redemption provision and the
disproportionate redemption provision. The $40,000 basis in the stock redeemed attaches to that
of Frank's remaining stock in Wren.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
Tracy and Lance, equal shareholders in Macaw Corporation, receive $250,000 each in distributions on
December 31 of the current year. During the current year, Macaw sold an appreciated asset for $500,000
(basis of $150,000). Payment for the sale of the asset will be made as follows: 50% next year and 50% in the
following year, with interest payable at a rate of 7.5%. Before considering the effect of the asset sale,
Macaw's current year E & P is $400,000 and it has no accumulated E & P. How much of Tracy's distribution
will be taxed as a dividend? Answer
Selected Answer:
$200,000
Response
Feedback: Accounting methods used for determining E & P are generally more conservative than those
allowed for calculating income tax. As a consequence, the installment method is not permitted
for E & P purposes. Thus, an adjustment is required for the deferred gain from property sales
made during the year. All principal payments are treated as having been received in the year of
the sale. Macaw's E & P of $400,000 in the current year is thereby increased by the $350,000 of
gain on the sale. Since Macaw now has $750,000 of E & P ($400,000 of current E & P plus
$350,000 of deferred gain), Tracy's entire distribution of $250,000 is a dividend.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Blue Corporation, a cash basis taxpayer, has taxable income of $700,000 for the current year. Blue elected
$80,000 of § 179 expense. It also had a related party loss of $30,000 and a realized (not recognized) gain
from an involuntary conversion of $85,000. It paid Federal income tax of $185,000 and a nondeductible fine
of $20,000. Blue's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$529,000
Response
Feedback: Taxable income is reduced by Federal income tax paid, the related party loss, and the
nondeductible fine. Eighty percent of the § 179 expense is added back. Thus, $700,000 -
$185,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 + $64,000 = $529,000. The involuntary conversion has no effect
since realized gain was not recognized.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements is incorrect with respect to determining current E & P? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Charitable contributions in excess of the 10% of taxable income limit should be subtracted
from taxable income.
Response
Feedback: All the adjustments are correct. Tax-exempt income and Federal income tax refunds are added
to taxable income because they increase the company's capacity to pay a dividend (choices a.
and d.). The dividends received deduction is added back because it does not represent a
reduction in the company's assets available for distribution (choice b.). Finally, disallowed
charitable contributions decrease the corporation's ability to make distributions to shareholders,
so they reduce E & P (choice c.).
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. John owns 400 of the shares, John's
father owns 300 shares, John's daughter owns 200 shares, and Redbird Corporation owns 100 shares. John
owns 70% of the stock in Redbird Corporation. How many shares is John deemed to own in Cardinal
Corporation under the attribution rules of § 318? Answer
Selected Answer:
1,000
Response
Feedback: John is deemed to own the shares of his father, his daughter, and since he is a 50% or greater
shareholder in Redbird, a proportionate number of shares owned by Redbird. Thus, John is
deemed to own 970 shares: his 400 shares plus his father's 300 shares plus his daughter's 200
shares plus 70 of Redbird's shares [100 (shares owned by Redbird)? 70% (John's ownership
interest in Redbird)].
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
On January 2, 2010, Orange Corporation purchased equipment for $300,000 with an ADS recovery period of
10 years and a MACRS useful life of 7 years. Section 179 was not elected. MACRS depreciation properly
claimed on the asset, including depreciation in the year of sale, totaled $79,605. The equipment was sold on
July 1, 2011, for $290,000. As a result of the sale, the adjustment to taxable income needed to arrive at
current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
Decrease $49,605
Response
Feedback: Gain on sale of the equipment for purposes of determining taxable income is $69,605, computed
as follows: $290,000 (selling price) - $220,395 (adjusted basis). The adjusted basis is
determined by subtracting the MACRS depreciation ($79,605) from the cost of $300,000. For
purposes of computing E & P, the gain is $20,000 [$290,000 (selling price) - $270,000 (E & P
adjusted basis)]. For E & P purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over 10 years, with the half-year convention. Thus, the corporation deducts $30,000 annually
for depreciation ($300,000 ÷ 10 years). In the years of purchase and sale, the company deducts
1/2 year of depreciation, or $15,000 per year. Therefore, total E & P depreciation is $30,000 and
the adjusted basis for E & P purposes is $270,000 [$300,000 (cost) - $30,000 (depreciation)].
The adjustment to taxable income to account for the difference in gain for tax and E & P
purposes is a decrease in taxable income of $49,605 [$20,000 (E & P gain) - $69,605 (taxable
gain)].
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Kingbird Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding. That stock is held by
Amata (550 shares) and Esteban (450 shares), who are unrelated individuals. Kingbird redeems 200 of
Amata's shares for $1,000 per share. Amata paid $300 per share for her Kingbird stock nine years ago.
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the stock redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
Amata has a long-term capital gain of $140,000.
Response
Feedback: The transaction qualifies for sale or exchange treatment as a disproportionate redemption.
Amata's 43.8% (350 shares ÷ 800 shares) postredemption interest in Kingbird is less than both
80% of her preredemption interest [43.8% < 44% (80% ? 550 shares ÷ 1,000 shares) and 50%.
The stock was held for more than one year; thus, the result is a long-term capital gain of
$140,000 [$200,000 (amount realized) - $60,000 (basis of 200 shares redeemed)]. The basis of
Amata's remaining shares is $105,000 (350 shares ? $300). The reduction in Kingbird's E & P
as a result of the qualifying stock redemption is limited to $160,000 [20% (percentage of shares
outstanding redeemed)? $800,000 (E & P at time of redemption)].
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Hawk Corporation has 300 shares of stock outstanding: Marina owns 60 shares, Kent owns 90 shares, and
Tom owns 75 shares. Blackbird Partnership owns the remaining 75 shares of stock in Hawk Corporation.
Marina, Kent, and Tom, all unrelated, are equal partners of Blackbird Partnership. With respect to the stock
attribution rules under § 318: Answer
Selected Answer:
Marina owns, directly and indirectly, 85 shares in Hawk Corporation.
Response
Feedback: A partner is deemed to own stock held by the partnership in proportion to the partner's interest
in the partnership. Thus, Marina owns 85 shares in Hawk Corporation [60 shares directly plus
25 shares indirectly from Blackbird Partnership (1/3 ? 75 shares)]. Similarly, Kent owns 115
shares (90 shares directly plus 25 shares indirectly) and Tom owns 100 shares (75 shares
directly plus 25 shares indirectly) in Hawk Corporation. A partnership is deemed to own all of
the stock owned by its partners; thus, Blackbird Partnership owns all 300 shares in Hawk (75
shares directly plus 225 shares indirectly from the three partners).
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Five years ago, Eleanor transferred property she had used in her sole proprietorship to Blue Corporation for
1,000 shares of Blue Corporation in a transaction that qualified under § 351. The assets had a tax basis to her
of $300,000 and a fair market value of $450,000 on the date of the transfer. In the current year, Blue
Corporation (E & P of $600,000) redeems 200 shares from Eleanor for $190,000 in a transaction that does
not qualify for sale or exchange treatment. With respect to the redemption, Eleanor will have a: Answer
Selected Answer:
$190,000 dividend
Response
Feedback: The transaction is treated as a return from her investment, and she has dividend income to
the extent of the entire distribution.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Brenda owns 900 shares of Eagle Corporation stock at a time when Eagle has 1,500 shares of stock
outstanding. The remaining shareholders are unrelated to Brenda. What is the minimum number of shares
Eagle must redeem from Brenda so that the transaction will qualify as a disproportionate redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
347 shares
Response
Feedback: Before the redemption, Brenda owns 60% of the outstanding shares of Eagle stock. To qualify
as a disproportionate redemption, Brenda must own, after the redemption, less than 48% (80% ?
60%) of the remaining outstanding shares of Eagle stock. Using a simple algebraic formula, the
minimum number of shares (rounded up to the next whole number) that must be redeemed is
347 shares.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Blue Corporation, a cash basis taxpayer, has taxable income of $700,000 for the current year. Blue elected
$80,000 of § 179 expense. It also had a related party loss of $30,000 and a realized (not recognized) gain
from an involuntary conversion of $85,000. It paid Federal income tax of $185,000 and a nondeductible fine
of $20,000. Blue's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$529,000
Response
Feedback: Taxable income is reduced by Federal income tax paid, the related party loss, and the
nondeductible fine. Eighty percent of the § 179 expense is added back. Thus, $700,000 -
$185,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 + $64,000 = $529,000. The involuntary conversion has no effect
since realized gain was not recognized.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
Hazel, Emily, and Frank, unrelated individuals, own all of the stock in Wren Corporation (E & P of
$900,000) as follows: Hazel, 250 shares; Emily, 250 shares; and Frank, 1,000 shares. Wren redeems 400 of
Frank's shares (basis of $40,000) for $200,000. With respect to the distribution in redemption of the stock: Answer
Selected Answer:
Frank has a capital gain of $160,000.
Response
Feedback: The distribution does not satisfy any of the qualifying stock redemption provisions and, as such,
is taxed as dividend income. Frank's ownership interest in Wren Corporation after the
redemption is 54.5% (600 shares owned after redemption ÷ 1,100 shares outstanding after
redemption). Since he continues to control Wren Corporation after the redemption, the
transaction fails both the not essentially equivalent redemption provision and the
disproportionate redemption provision. The $40,000 basis in the stock redeemed attaches to that
of Frank's remaining stock in Wren.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Brenda owns 900 shares of Eagle Corporation stock at a time when Eagle has 1,500 shares of stock
outstanding. The remaining shareholders are unrelated to Brenda. What is the minimum number of shares
Eagle must redeem from Brenda so that the transaction will qualify as a disproportionate redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
347 shares
Response
Feedback: Before the redemption, Brenda owns 60% of the outstanding shares of Eagle stock. To qualify
as a disproportionate redemption, Brenda must own, after the redemption, less than 48% (80% ?
60%) of the remaining outstanding shares of Eagle stock. Using a simple algebraic formula, the
minimum number of shares (rounded up to the next whole number) that must be redeemed is
347 shares.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Pheasant Corporation ended its first year of operations with taxable income of $225,000. At the time of
Pheasant's formation, it incurred $50,000 of organizational expenses. In calculating its taxable income for
the year, Pheasant claimed an $8,000 deduction for the organizational expenses. What is Pheasant's current E
& P? Answer
Selected Answer:
$233,000
Response
Feedback: In determining E & P, there is no allowance for the amortization of organizational expenses.
Any such expense deducted when computing taxable income must be added back to determine
E & P. Consequently, Pheasant's E & P is $233,000 ($225,000 of current year E & P plus
$8,000 of organizational expenses).
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. John owns 400 of the shares, John's
father owns 300 shares, John's daughter owns 200 shares, and Redbird Corporation owns 100 shares. John
owns 70% of the stock in Redbird Corporation. How many shares is John deemed to own in Cardinal
Corporation under the attribution rules of § 318? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: John is deemed to own the shares of his father, his daughter, and since he is a 50% or greater
shareholder in Redbird, a proportionate number of shares owned by Redbird. Thus, John is
deemed to own 970 shares: his 400 shares plus his father's 300 shares plus his daughter's 200
shares plus 70 of Redbird's shares [100 (shares owned by Redbird)? 70% (John's ownership
interest in Redbird)].
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Five years ago, Eleanor transferred property she had used in her sole proprietorship to Blue Corporation for
1,000 shares of Blue Corporation in a transaction that qualified under § 351. The assets had a tax basis to her
of $300,000 and a fair market value of $450,000 on the date of the transfer. In the current year, Blue
Corporation (E & P of $600,000) redeems 200 shares from Eleanor for $190,000 in a transaction that does
not qualify for sale or exchange treatment. With respect to the redemption, Eleanor will have a: Answer
Selected Answer:
$190,000 dividend
Response
Feedback: The transaction is treated as a return from her investment, and she has dividend income to
the extent of the entire distribution.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Crow Corporation has 800 shares of stock outstanding. Ted owns 300 shares, Ted's mother owns 100 shares,
Ted's sister owns 80 shares, and Ted's granddaughter owns 120 shares. Bluebird Corporation owns the
remaining 200 shares of stock in Crow. Ted owns 30% of the stock in Bluebird Corporation. In applying the
§ 318 stock attribution rules, how many shares does Ted own in Crow Corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
520
Response
Feedback: Ted owns 520 shares, 300 shares directly and 220 shares constructively, in Crow Corporation.
Ted owns the shares of his mother (100 shares) and his granddaughter (120 shares). Ted is not
deemed to own the stock of his sister or Bluebird Corporation (in which he owns less than
50%).
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Kingbird Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding. That stock is held by
Amata (550 shares) and Esteban (450 shares), who are unrelated individuals. Kingbird redeems 200 of
Amata's shares for $1,000 per share. Amata paid $300 per share for her Kingbird stock nine years ago.
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the stock redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
Amata has a long-term capital gain of $140,000.
Response
Feedback: The transaction qualifies for sale or exchange treatment as a disproportionate redemption.
Amata's 43.8% (350 shares ÷ 800 shares) postredemption interest in Kingbird is less than both
80% of her preredemption interest [43.8% < 44% (80% ? 550 shares ÷ 1,000 shares) and 50%.
The stock was held for more than one year; thus, the result is a long-term capital gain of
$140,000 [$200,000 (amount realized) - $60,000 (basis of 200 shares redeemed)]. The basis of
Amata's remaining shares is $105,000 (350 shares ? $300). The reduction in Kingbird's E & P
as a result of the qualifying stock redemption is limited to $160,000 [20% (percentage of shares
outstanding redeemed)? $800,000 (E & P at time of redemption)].
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
The tax treatment of corporate distributions at the shareholder level does not depend on: Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: While the character of distributed property can impact the tax treatment of gain recognized by
the corporation, it will have no impact on the shareholder.
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements is incorrect with respect to determining current E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
Federal income tax refunds should be added back to taxable income.
Response
Feedback: All the adjustments are correct. Tax-exempt income and Federal income tax refunds are added
to taxable income because they increase the company's capacity to pay a dividend (choices a.
and d.). The dividends received deduction is added back because it does not represent a
reduction in the company's assets available for distribution (choice b.). Finally, disallowed
charitable contributions decrease the corporation's ability to make distributions to shareholders,
so they reduce E & P (choice c.).
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Hawk Corporation has 300 shares of stock outstanding: Marina owns 60 shares, Kent owns 90 shares, and
Tom owns 75 shares. Blackbird Partnership owns the remaining 75 shares of stock in Hawk Corporation.
Marina, Kent, and Tom, all unrelated, are equal partners of Blackbird Partnership. With respect to the stock
attribution rules under § 318: Answer
Selected Answer:
Marina owns, directly and indirectly, 85 shares in Hawk Corporation.
Response
Feedback: A partner is deemed to own stock held by the partnership in proportion to the partner's interest
in the partnership. Thus, Marina owns 85 shares in Hawk Corporation [60 shares directly plus
25 shares indirectly from Blackbird Partnership (1/3 ? 75 shares)]. Similarly, Kent owns 115
shares (90 shares directly plus 25 shares indirectly) and Tom owns 100 shares (75 shares
directly plus 25 shares indirectly) in Hawk Corporation. A partnership is deemed to own all of
the stock owned by its partners; thus, Blackbird Partnership owns all 300 shares in Hawk (75
shares directly plus 225 shares indirectly from the three partners).
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Tracy and Lance, equal shareholders in Macaw Corporation, receive $250,000 each in distributions on
December 31 of the current year. During the current year, Macaw sold an appreciated asset for $500,000
(basis of $150,000). Payment for the sale of the asset will be made as follows: 50% next year and 50% in the
following year, with interest payable at a rate of 7.5%. Before considering the effect of the asset sale,
Macaw's current year E & P is $400,000 and it has no accumulated E & P. How much of Tracy's distribution
will be taxed as a dividend? Answer
Selected Answer:
$250,000
Response
Feedback: Accounting methods used for determining E & P are generally more conservative than those
allowed for calculating income tax. As a consequence, the installment method is not permitted
for E & P purposes. Thus, an adjustment is required for the deferred gain from property sales
made during the year. All principal payments are treated as having been received in the year of
the sale. Macaw's E & P of $400,000 in the current year is thereby increased by the $350,000 of
gain on the sale. Since Macaw now has $750,000 of E & P ($400,000 of current E & P plus
$350,000 of deferred gain), Tracy's entire distribution of $250,000 is a dividend.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
On January 2, 2010, Orange Corporation purchased equipment for $300,000 with an ADS recovery period of
10 years and a MACRS useful life of 7 years. Section 179 was not elected. MACRS depreciation properly
claimed on the asset, including depreciation in the year of sale, totaled $79,605. The equipment was sold on
July 1, 2011, for $290,000. As a result of the sale, the adjustment to taxable income needed to arrive at
current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
Decrease $49,605
Response
Feedback: Gain on sale of the equipment for purposes of determining taxable income is $69,605, computed
as follows: $290,000 (selling price) - $220,395 (adjusted basis). The adjusted basis is
determined by subtracting the MACRS depreciation ($79,605) from the cost of $300,000. For
purposes of computing E & P, the gain is $20,000 [$290,000 (selling price) - $270,000 (E & P
adjusted basis)]. For E & P purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over 10 years, with the half-year convention. Thus, the corporation deducts $30,000 annually
for depreciation ($300,000 ÷ 10 years). In the years of purchase and sale, the company deducts
1/2 year of depreciation, or $15,000 per year. Therefore, total E & P depreciation is $30,000 and
the adjusted basis for E & P purposes is $270,000 [$300,000 (cost) - $30,000 (depreciation)].
The adjustment to taxable income to account for the difference in gain for tax and E & P
purposes is a decrease in taxable income of $49,605 [$20,000 (E & P gain) - $69,605 (taxable
gain)].
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Five years ago, Eleanor transferred property she had used in her sole proprietorship to Blue Corporation for
1,000 shares of Blue Corporation in a transaction that qualified under § 351. The assets had a tax basis to her
of $300,000 and a fair market value of $450,000 on the date of the transfer. In the current year, Blue
Corporation (E & P of $600,000) redeems 200 shares from Eleanor for $190,000 in a transaction that does
not qualify for sale or exchange treatment. With respect to the redemption, Eleanor will have a: Answer
Selected Answer:
$190,000 dividend
Response
Feedback: The transaction is treated as a return from her investment, and she has dividend income to
the extent of the entire distribution.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Crow Corporation has 800 shares of stock outstanding. Ted owns 300 shares, Ted's mother owns 100 shares,
Ted's sister owns 80 shares, and Ted's granddaughter owns 120 shares. Bluebird Corporation owns the
remaining 200 shares of stock in Crow. Ted owns 30% of the stock in Bluebird Corporation. In applying the
§ 318 stock attribution rules, how many shares does Ted own in Crow Corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
520
Response
Feedback: Ted owns 520 shares, 300 shares directly and 220 shares constructively, in Crow Corporation.
Ted owns the shares of his mother (100 shares) and his granddaughter (120 shares). Ted is not
deemed to own the stock of his sister or Bluebird Corporation (in which he owns less than
50%).
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Kingbird Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding. That stock is held by
Amata (550 shares) and Esteban (450 shares), who are unrelated individuals. Kingbird redeems 200 of
Amata's shares for $1,000 per share. Amata paid $300 per share for her Kingbird stock nine years ago.
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the stock redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
Amata has a long-term capital gain of $140,000.
Response
Feedback: The transaction qualifies for sale or exchange treatment as a disproportionate redemption.
Amata's 43.8% (350 shares ÷ 800 shares) postredemption interest in Kingbird is less than both
80% of her preredemption interest [43.8% < 44% (80% ? 550 shares ÷ 1,000 shares) and 50%.
The stock was held for more than one year; thus, the result is a long-term capital gain of
$140,000 [$200,000 (amount realized) - $60,000 (basis of 200 shares redeemed)]. The basis of
Amata's remaining shares is $105,000 (350 shares ? $300). The reduction in Kingbird's E & P
as a result of the qualifying stock redemption is limited to $160,000 [20% (percentage of shares
outstanding redeemed)? $800,000 (E & P at time of redemption)].
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Pheasant Corporation ended its first year of operations with taxable income of $225,000. At the time of
Pheasant's formation, it incurred $50,000 of organizational expenses. In calculating its taxable income for
the year, Pheasant claimed an $8,000 deduction for the organizational expenses. What is Pheasant's current E
& P? Answer
Selected Answer:
$233,000
Response
Feedback: In determining E & P, there is no allowance for the amortization of organizational expenses.
Any such expense deducted when computing taxable income must be added back to determine
E & P. Consequently, Pheasant's E & P is $233,000 ($225,000 of current year E & P plus
$8,000 of organizational expenses).
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements is incorrect with respect to determining current E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above statements are incorrect.
Response
Feedback: All the adjustments are correct. Tax-exempt income and Federal income tax refunds are added
to taxable income because they increase the company's capacity to pay a dividend (choices a.
and d.). The dividends received deduction is added back because it does not represent a
reduction in the company's assets available for distribution (choice b.). Finally, disallowed
charitable contributions decrease the corporation's ability to make distributions to shareholders,
so they reduce E & P (choice c.).
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
The tax treatment of corporate distributions at the shareholder level does not depend on: Answer
Selected Answer:
The basis of stock in the hands of the shareholder
Response
Feedback: While the character of distributed property can impact the tax treatment of gain recognized by
the corporation, it will have no impact on the shareholder.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Blue Corporation, a cash basis taxpayer, has taxable income of $700,000 for the current year. Blue elected
$80,000 of § 179 expense. It also had a related party loss of $30,000 and a realized (not recognized) gain
from an involuntary conversion of $85,000. It paid Federal income tax of $185,000 and a nondeductible fine
of $20,000. Blue's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$529,000
Response Taxable income is reduced by Federal income tax paid, the related party loss, and the
Feedback: nondeductible fine. Eighty percent of the § 179 expense is added back. Thus, $700,000 -
$185,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 + $64,000 = $529,000. The involuntary conversion has no effect
since realized gain was not recognized.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Brenda owns 900 shares of Eagle Corporation stock at a time when Eagle has 1,500 shares of stock
outstanding. The remaining shareholders are unrelated to Brenda. What is the minimum number of shares
Eagle must redeem from Brenda so that the transaction will qualify as a disproportionate redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
347 shares
Response
Feedback: Before the redemption, Brenda owns 60% of the outstanding shares of Eagle stock. To qualify
as a disproportionate redemption, Brenda must own, after the redemption, less than 48% (80% ?
60%) of the remaining outstanding shares of Eagle stock. Using a simple algebraic formula, the
minimum number of shares (rounded up to the next whole number) that must be redeemed is
347 shares.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Crow Corporation has 800 shares of stock outstanding. Ted owns 300 shares, Ted's mother owns 100 shares,
Ted's sister owns 80 shares, and Ted's granddaughter owns 120 shares. Bluebird Corporation owns the
remaining 200 shares of stock in Crow. Ted owns 30% of the stock in Bluebird Corporation. In applying the
§ 318 stock attribution rules, how many shares does Ted own in Crow Corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
520
Response
Feedback: Ted owns 520 shares, 300 shares directly and 220 shares constructively, in Crow Corporation.
Ted owns the shares of his mother (100 shares) and his granddaughter (120 shares). Ted is not
deemed to own the stock of his sister or Bluebird Corporation (in which he owns less than
50%).
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements is incorrect with respect to determining current E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
Dividends received deductions should be added back to taxable income.
Response
Feedback: All the adjustments are correct. Tax-exempt income and Federal income tax refunds are added
to taxable income because they increase the company's capacity to pay a dividend (choices a.
and d.). The dividends received deduction is added back because it does not represent a
reduction in the company's assets available for distribution (choice b.). Finally, disallowed
charitable contributions decrease the corporation's ability to make distributions to shareholders,
so they reduce E & P (choice c.).
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
The tax treatment of corporate distributions at the shareholder level does not depend on: Answer
Selected Answer:
Whether the distributed property is received by an individual or a corporation
Response
Feedback: While the character of distributed property can impact the tax treatment of gain recognized by
the corporation, it will have no impact on the shareholder.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Kingbird Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding. That stock is held by
Amata (550 shares) and Esteban (450 shares), who are unrelated individuals. Kingbird redeems 200 of
Amata's shares for $1,000 per share. Amata paid $300 per share for her Kingbird stock nine years ago.
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the stock redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
Amata has a long-term capital gain of $140,000.
Response
Feedback: The transaction qualifies for sale or exchange treatment as a disproportionate redemption.
Amata's 43.8% (350 shares ÷ 800 shares) postredemption interest in Kingbird is less than both
80% of her preredemption interest [43.8% < 44% (80% ? 550 shares ÷ 1,000 shares) and 50%.
The stock was held for more than one year; thus, the result is a long-term capital gain of
$140,000 [$200,000 (amount realized) - $60,000 (basis of 200 shares redeemed)]. The basis of
Amata's remaining shares is $105,000 (350 shares ? $300). The reduction in Kingbird's E & P
as a result of the qualifying stock redemption is limited to $160,000 [20% (percentage of shares
outstanding redeemed)? $800,000 (E & P at time of redemption)].
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Tracy and Lance, equal shareholders in Macaw Corporation, receive $250,000 each in distributions on
December 31 of the current year. During the current year, Macaw sold an appreciated asset for $500,000
(basis of $150,000). Payment for the sale of the asset will be made as follows: 50% next year and 50% in the
following year, with interest payable at a rate of 7.5%. Before considering the effect of the asset sale,
Macaw's current year E & P is $400,000 and it has no accumulated E & P. How much of Tracy's distribution
will be taxed as a dividend? Answer
Selected Answer:
$250,000
Response
Feedback: Accounting methods used for determining E & P are generally more conservative than those
allowed for calculating income tax. As a consequence, the installment method is not permitted
for E & P purposes. Thus, an adjustment is required for the deferred gain from property sales
made during the year. All principal payments are treated as having been received in the year of
the sale. Macaw's E & P of $400,000 in the current year is thereby increased by the $350,000 of
gain on the sale. Since Macaw now has $750,000 of E & P ($400,000 of current E & P plus
$350,000 of deferred gain), Tracy's entire distribution of $250,000 is a dividend.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. John owns 400 of the shares, John's
father owns 300 shares, John's daughter owns 200 shares, and Redbird Corporation owns 100 shares. John
owns 70% of the stock in Redbird Corporation. How many shares is John deemed to own in Cardinal
Corporation under the attribution rules of § 318? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: John is deemed to own the shares of his father, his daughter, and since he is a 50% or greater
shareholder in Redbird, a proportionate number of shares owned by Redbird. Thus, John is
deemed to own 970 shares: his 400 shares plus his father's 300 shares plus his daughter's 200
shares plus 70 of Redbird's shares [100 (shares owned by Redbird)? 70% (John's ownership
interest in Redbird)].
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Hawk Corporation has 300 shares of stock outstanding: Marina owns 60 shares, Kent owns 90 shares, and
Tom owns 75 shares. Blackbird Partnership owns the remaining 75 shares of stock in Hawk Corporation.
Marina, Kent, and Tom, all unrelated, are equal partners of Blackbird Partnership. With respect to the stock
attribution rules under § 318: Answer
Selected Answer:
Marina owns, directly and indirectly, 85 shares in Hawk Corporation.
Response
Feedback: A partner is deemed to own stock held by the partnership in proportion to the partner's interest
in the partnership. Thus, Marina owns 85 shares in Hawk Corporation [60 shares directly plus
25 shares indirectly from Blackbird Partnership (1/3 ? 75 shares)]. Similarly, Kent owns 115
shares (90 shares directly plus 25 shares indirectly) and Tom owns 100 shares (75 shares
directly plus 25 shares indirectly) in Hawk Corporation. A partnership is deemed to own all of
the stock owned by its partners; thus, Blackbird Partnership owns all 300 shares in Hawk (75
shares directly plus 225 shares indirectly from the three partners).
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Hazel, Emily, and Frank, unrelated individuals, own all of the stock in Wren Corporation (E & P of
$900,000) as follows: Hazel, 250 shares; Emily, 250 shares; and Frank, 1,000 shares. Wren redeems 400 of
Frank's shares (basis of $40,000) for $200,000. With respect to the distribution in redemption of the stock: Answer
Selected Answer:
Frank has dividend income of $200,000.
Response
Feedback: The distribution does not satisfy any of the qualifying stock redemption provisions and, as such,
is taxed as dividend income. Frank's ownership interest in Wren Corporation after the
redemption is 54.5% (600 shares owned after redemption ÷ 1,100 shares outstanding after
redemption). Since he continues to control Wren Corporation after the redemption, the
transaction fails both the not essentially equivalent redemption provision and the
disproportionate redemption provision. The $40,000 basis in the stock redeemed attaches to that
of Frank's remaining stock in Wren.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
On January 2, 2010, Orange Corporation purchased equipment for $300,000 with an ADS recovery period of
10 years and a MACRS useful life of 7 years. Section 179 was not elected. MACRS depreciation properly
claimed on the asset, including depreciation in the year of sale, totaled $79,605. The equipment was sold on
July 1, 2011, for $290,000. As a result of the sale, the adjustment to taxable income needed to arrive at
current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
Decrease $49,605
Response Gain on sale of the equipment for purposes of determining taxable income is $69,605, computed
Feedback: as follows: $290,000 (selling price) - $220,395 (adjusted basis). The adjusted basis is
determined by subtracting the MACRS depreciation ($79,605) from the cost of $300,000. For
purposes of computing E & P, the gain is $20,000 [$290,000 (selling price) - $270,000 (E & P
adjusted basis)]. For E & P purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over 10 years, with the half-year convention. Thus, the corporation deducts $30,000 annually
for depreciation ($300,000 ÷ 10 years). In the years of purchase and sale, the company deducts
1/2 year of depreciation, or $15,000 per year. Therefore, total E & P depreciation is $30,000 and
the adjusted basis for E & P purposes is $270,000 [$300,000 (cost) - $30,000 (depreciation)].
The adjustment to taxable income to account for the difference in gain for tax and E & P
purposes is a decrease in taxable income of $49,605 [$20,000 (E & P gain) - $69,605 (taxable
gain)].
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Blue Corporation, a cash basis taxpayer, has taxable income of $700,000 for the current year. Blue elected
$80,000 of § 179 expense. It also had a related party loss of $30,000 and a realized (not recognized) gain
from an involuntary conversion of $85,000. It paid Federal income tax of $185,000 and a nondeductible fine
of $20,000. Blue's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$529,000
Response
Feedback: Taxable income is reduced by Federal income tax paid, the related party loss, and the
nondeductible fine. Eighty percent of the § 179 expense is added back. Thus, $700,000 -
$185,000 - $30,000 - $20,000 + $64,000 = $529,000. The involuntary conversion has no effect
since realized gain was not recognized.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Kingbird Corporation (E & P of $800,000) has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding. That stock is held by
Amata (550 shares) and Esteban (450 shares), who are unrelated individuals. Kingbird redeems 200 of
Amata's shares for $1,000 per share. Amata paid $300 per share for her Kingbird stock nine years ago.
Which of the following statements is correct with respect to the stock redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
Amata has a long-term capital gain of $140,000.
Response
Feedback: The transaction qualifies for sale or exchange treatment as a disproportionate redemption.
Amata's 43.8% (350 shares ÷ 800 shares) postredemption interest in Kingbird is less than both
80% of her preredemption interest [43.8% < 44% (80% ? 550 shares ÷ 1,000 shares) and 50%.
The stock was held for more than one year; thus, the result is a long-term capital gain of
$140,000 [$200,000 (amount realized) - $60,000 (basis of 200 shares redeemed)]. The basis of
Amata's remaining shares is $105,000 (350 shares ? $300). The reduction in Kingbird's E & P
as a result of the qualifying stock redemption is limited to $160,000 [20% (percentage of shares
outstanding redeemed)? $800,000 (E & P at time of redemption)].
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Brenda owns 900 shares of Eagle Corporation stock at a time when Eagle has 1,500 shares of stock
outstanding. The remaining shareholders are unrelated to Brenda. What is the minimum number of shares
Eagle must redeem from Brenda so that the transaction will qualify as a disproportionate redemption? Answer
Selected Answer:
347 shares
Response
Feedback: Before the redemption, Brenda owns 60% of the outstanding shares of Eagle stock. To qualify
as a disproportionate redemption, Brenda must own, after the redemption, less than 48% (80% ?
60%) of the remaining outstanding shares of Eagle stock. Using a simple algebraic formula, the
minimum number of shares (rounded up to the next whole number) that must be redeemed is
347 shares.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Hazel, Emily, and Frank, unrelated individuals, own all of the stock in Wren Corporation (E & P of
$900,000) as follows: Hazel, 250 shares; Emily, 250 shares; and Frank, 1,000 shares. Wren redeems 400 of
Frank's shares (basis of $40,000) for $200,000. With respect to the distribution in redemption of the stock: Answer
Selected Answer:
Frank has dividend income of $200,000.
Response
Feedback: The distribution does not satisfy any of the qualifying stock redemption provisions and, as such,
is taxed as dividend income. Frank's ownership interest in Wren Corporation after the
redemption is 54.5% (600 shares owned after redemption ÷ 1,100 shares outstanding after
redemption). Since he continues to control Wren Corporation after the redemption, the
transaction fails both the not essentially equivalent redemption provision and the
disproportionate redemption provision. The $40,000 basis in the stock redeemed attaches to that
of Frank's remaining stock in Wren.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Tracy and Lance, equal shareholders in Macaw Corporation, receive $250,000 each in distributions on
December 31 of the current year. During the current year, Macaw sold an appreciated asset for $500,000
(basis of $150,000). Payment for the sale of the asset will be made as follows: 50% next year and 50% in the
following year, with interest payable at a rate of 7.5%. Before considering the effect of the asset sale,
Macaw's current year E & P is $400,000 and it has no accumulated E & P. How much of Tracy's distribution
will be taxed as a dividend? Answer
Selected Answer:
$250,000
Response
Feedback: Accounting methods used for determining E & P are generally more conservative than those
allowed for calculating income tax. As a consequence, the installment method is not permitted
for E & P purposes. Thus, an adjustment is required for the deferred gain from property sales
made during the year. All principal payments are treated as having been received in the year of
the sale. Macaw's E & P of $400,000 in the current year is thereby increased by the $350,000 of
gain on the sale. Since Macaw now has $750,000 of E & P ($400,000 of current E & P plus
$350,000 of deferred gain), Tracy's entire distribution of $250,000 is a dividend.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Hawk Corporation has 300 shares of stock outstanding: Marina owns 60 shares, Kent owns 90 shares, and
Tom owns 75 shares. Blackbird Partnership owns the remaining 75 shares of stock in Hawk Corporation.
Marina, Kent, and Tom, all unrelated, are equal partners of Blackbird Partnership. With respect to the stock
attribution rules under § 318: Answer
Selected Answer:
Marina owns, directly and indirectly, 85 shares in Hawk Corporation.
Response
Feedback: A partner is deemed to own stock held by the partnership in proportion to the partner's interest
in the partnership. Thus, Marina owns 85 shares in Hawk Corporation [60 shares directly plus
25 shares indirectly from Blackbird Partnership (1/3 ? 75 shares)]. Similarly, Kent owns 115
shares (90 shares directly plus 25 shares indirectly) and Tom owns 100 shares (75 shares
directly plus 25 shares indirectly) in Hawk Corporation. A partnership is deemed to own all of
the stock owned by its partners; thus, Blackbird Partnership owns all 300 shares in Hawk (75
shares directly plus 225 shares indirectly from the three partners).
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Five years ago, Eleanor transferred property she had used in her sole proprietorship to Blue Corporation for
1,000 shares of Blue Corporation in a transaction that qualified under § 351. The assets had a tax basis to her
of $300,000 and a fair market value of $450,000 on the date of the transfer. In the current year, Blue
Corporation (E & P of $600,000) redeems 200 shares from Eleanor for $190,000 in a transaction that does
not qualify for sale or exchange treatment. With respect to the redemption, Eleanor will have a: Answer
Selected Answer:
$190,000 dividend
Response
Feedback: The transaction is treated as a return from her investment, and she has dividend income to
the extent of the entire distribution.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. John owns 400 of the shares, John's
father owns 300 shares, John's daughter owns 200 shares, and Redbird Corporation owns 100 shares. John
owns 70% of the stock in Redbird Corporation. How many shares is John deemed to own in Cardinal
Corporation under the attribution rules of § 318? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: John is deemed to own the shares of his father, his daughter, and since he is a 50% or greater
shareholder in Redbird, a proportionate number of shares owned by Redbird. Thus, John is
deemed to own 970 shares: his 400 shares plus his father's 300 shares plus his daughter's 200
shares plus 70 of Redbird's shares [100 (shares owned by Redbird)? 70% (John's ownership
interest in Redbird)].
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
On January 2, 2010, Orange Corporation purchased equipment for $300,000 with an ADS recovery period of
10 years and a MACRS useful life of 7 years. Section 179 was not elected. MACRS depreciation properly
claimed on the asset, including depreciation in the year of sale, totaled $79,605. The equipment was sold on
July 1, 2011, for $290,000. As a result of the sale, the adjustment to taxable income needed to arrive at
current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
Decrease $49,605
Response
Feedback: Gain on sale of the equipment for purposes of determining taxable income is $69,605, computed
as follows: $290,000 (selling price) - $220,395 (adjusted basis). The adjusted basis is
determined by subtracting the MACRS depreciation ($79,605) from the cost of $300,000. For
purposes of computing E & P, the gain is $20,000 [$290,000 (selling price) - $270,000 (E & P
adjusted basis)]. For E & P purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over 10 years, with the half-year convention. Thus, the corporation deducts $30,000 annually
for depreciation ($300,000 ÷ 10 years). In the years of purchase and sale, the company deducts
1/2 year of depreciation, or $15,000 per year. Therefore, total E & P depreciation is $30,000 and
the adjusted basis for E & P purposes is $270,000 [$300,000 (cost) - $30,000 (depreciation)].
The adjustment to taxable income to account for the difference in gain for tax and E & P
purposes is a decrease in taxable income of $49,605 [$20,000 (E & P gain) - $69,605 (taxable
gain)].
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Pheasant Corporation ended its first year of operations with taxable income of $225,000. At the time of
Pheasant's formation, it incurred $50,000 of organizational expenses. In calculating its taxable income for
the year, Pheasant claimed an $8,000 deduction for the organizational expenses. What is Pheasant's current E
& P? Answer
Selected Answer:
$233,000
Response
Feedback: In determining E & P, there is no allowance for the amortization of organizational expenses.
Any such expense deducted when computing taxable income must be added back to determine
E & P. Consequently, Pheasant's E & P is $233,000 ($225,000 of current year E & P plus
$8,000 of organizational expenses).
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following is false regarding a "Type A" reorganization? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Generally, the dissenting shareholders of the target may have their shares appraised and
bought outright if they so desire.
Response
Feedback: The acquiring corporation must assume all the liabilities of the target corporation as a
matter of law.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Silver Corporation redeems all of Alluvia's 3,000 shares and distributes to her 1,000 shares of Gold
Corporation stock plus $20,000 cash. Alluvia's basis in her 30% interest in Silver is $80,000 and the stock's
market value is $120,000. At the time Silver is acquired by Gold, the accumulated earnings and profits of
Silver are $100,000 and Gold's are $50,000. How does Alluvia treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Alluvia reports a $20,000 recognized dividend.
Response
Feedback: Alluvia has a realized gain of $40,000 ($120,000 - $80,000) and a recognized dividend of
$20,000. Her proportionate share of Silver Corporation's accumulated earnings and profits is in
excess of $20,000 ($100,000 x 30% = $30,000).
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Staff, Inc., has taxable income of $10 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$306,000
Response Feedback: $10 million x 9% x 34% = $306,000.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Beige Corporation (a calendar year taxpayer) has taxable income of $150,000, and its financial records
reflect the following for the year. Federal income taxes paid $75,000
Net operating loss carryforward deducted currently $35,000
Gain recognized this year on an installment sale from a prior year $22,000
Depreciation deducted on tax return (ADS depreciation would have been $5,000) $20,000
Interest income on Iowa state bonds $4,000
Beige Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$77,000
Response
Feedback: To determine E & P, the Federal income tax is subtracted from taxable income and the net
operating loss carryforward is added. The gain recognized currently from the prior year's
installment sale is subtracted. The excess of depreciation deducted on the tax return over ADS
depreciation and the interest from Iowa state bonds are added.
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
One of the tenets of U.S. tax policy is to encourage business development. Which of the following Code
sections does not support this tenet? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above provisions support the tenet.
Response Feedback: Like-kind exchange rules do not apply to exchanges of corporate stock.
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Red Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, has taxable income of $600,000. Among its transactions for the
year are the following: Collection of proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of cash surrender value)$10,000
Realized gain (not recognized) on an involuntary conversion $5,000
Nondeductible fines and penalties $35,000
Disregarding any provision for Federal income taxes, Red Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$565,000
Response
Feedback: To taxable income, the proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of
cash surrender value) is added and the nondeductible fines and penalties are subtracted. The
realized gain (not recognized) on the involuntary conversion has no effect on E & P.
Question 7
0 out of 1 points
Target Corporation is merging into Acquiring Corporation under state law requirements. Target has 3,000
shares outstanding, with a value of $100 per share. Joey, one of Target's shareholders, exchanges his 500
Target shares, for which he paid $80 per share, for 1,000 shares of Crow stock, valued at $30 per share, and
$5,000 cash. Acquiring owns 40% of Crow stock. How does Joey treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Joey recognizes no gain or loss.
Response
Feedback: This is a taxable transaction because Joey received no stock in Acquiring in exchange for his
stock in Target. Acquiring's ownership of Crow is an investment. Thus, Crow is not a party to
the reorganization. 500 x $80 = $40,000 basis - $30,000 Crow stock - $5,000 cash = $5,000 loss
for Joey.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following is a characteristic of the DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
Applicable only to manufactured goods that are exported from the U.S
Response
Feedback: As long as the domestic portion of the production is substantial, DPGR results (choice d. ).
DPAD applies to most entities including S corporations (choice a. ). Not only can DPGR result
from the performance of engineering and architectural services, but certain embedded services
can qualify (choice c.). There are no restrictions or requirements on where the manufactured
goods have to be sent or sold (choice b. ).
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Gabriella and Juanita form Luster Corporation. Gabriella transfers cash of $50,000 for 50 shares of stock,
while Juanita transfers a secret process (basis of zero and fair market value of $50,000) for 50 shares of
stock. Answer
Selected Answer:
Neither Gabriella nor Juanita will recognize gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: The transfers are nontaxable to both Gariella and Juanita. Each of them qualifies as a property
transferor and together control the corporation. Therefore, the transfer is subject to tax deferred
treatment under § 351.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Yellow Corporation and Green Corporation enter into a "Type A" reorganization. Raul currently holds a 15-
year $100,000 Green bond paying 6% interest. In exchange for his Green bond, Raul receives a 5-year
$125,000 Yellow bond paying 5% interest. Raul is happy with the Yellow bond because, even though it pays
a lower interest rate, the yield provides slightly more interest than the Green bond, and both bonds mature on
the same date. How does Raul treat this transaction on his tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Raul recognizes gain of $25,000 on the exchange ($125,000 - $100,000).
Response
Feedback: Raul recognizes gain to the extent that the principal amounts of the bonds received are in
excess of the bonds given up, or $25,000.
Question 11
0 out of 1 points
Norma formed Hyacinth Enterprises, a proprietorship, in 2010. In its first year, Hyacinth had operating
income of $200,000 and operating expenses of $100,000. In addition, Hyacinth had a long-term capital loss
of $9,000. Norma, the proprietor of Hyacinth Enterprises, withdrew $50,000 from Hyacinth during the year.
Assuming Norma has no other capital gains or losses, how does this information affect her taxable income
for 2010? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Increases Norma's taxable income by $41,000 ($50,000 ordinary business income - $9,000
long-term capital loss)
Response
Feedback: A proprietorship is not a separate taxable entity. As a proprietor, Norma reports profit or loss
from Hyacinth on her individual return. Norma's taxable income for 2010 will be increased by
$97,000 ($200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000 net ordinary business income - $3,000 capital loss
deduction). The $50,000 she withdrew from Hyacinth has no effect on her taxable income.
Question 12
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements regarding "Type B" reorganizations is true? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Since the shareholders of the target are likely to have greater than a 50 percentage point
ownership change, the § 382 limitation usually apply to "Type B" reorganizations.
Response
Feedback: "Type B" reorganizations are considered to be simple rather than complicated (choice a. ).
There is no acquisition of liabilities in a "Type B" reorganization (choice c.). Since the target
corporation continues, there is no acquisition of its loss attributes (choice d. ).
Question 13
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not a reorganization designated under § 368(a)(1)? Answer
Selected Answer:
Transfers due to a bankruptcy or receivership proceeding
Response Feedback: Answer (a) is a "Type G," b. is a "Type E," c. is a divisive "Type D," d. is a "Type B. "
Question 14
1 out of 1 points
Domingo and Juan, brothers, each own 300 shares in White Corporation (E & P of $700,000). Heron
Partnership owns the remaining 400 shares of stock in White Corporation, and Juan has a 25% interest in
Heron Partnership. White Corporation redeems 200 shares of Juan's stock for $120,000. Juan paid $150 a
share for the stock five years ago. With respect to the redemption: Answer
Selected Answer:
Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000.
Response
Feedback: The redemption meets both tests of § 302(b)(2) and qualifies for sale or exchange treatment.
Before and after the redemption, Juan is deemed to own a proportionate number of the White
shares owned by Heron Partnership, but none of the shares owned by Domingo. (The family
attribution rules do not include siblings.) Thus, before the redemption, Juan has a 40% interest
in White: 300 shares directly plus 100 shares indirectly from Heron (25% x 400). After the
redemption, Juan owns 25% of the stock in White Corporation: [200 shares (100 directly plus
100 indirectly from Heron) x 800 postredemption shares outstanding]. The 25% ownership
interest is less than 50% of the total voting power and less than 80% of Juan's original
ownership [25% is less than 32% (80% x 40%)]. Thus, the distribution is a disproportionate
redemption and Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000 [$120,000 (amount realized) -
$30,000 (stock basis)].
Question 15
0 out of 1 points
Gravity Corporation creates Earth Corporation. It transfers most of its assets (net value $900,000) to Earth.
At approximately the same time, Magnet Corporation also transfers all of its assets (net value $90,000) to
Earth. Gravity liquidates by transferring its remaining assets, $100,000 cash and 1,000 shares of Earth, to its
sole shareholder, Zia, in exchange for all of her Gravity stock. Zia's basis in her Gravity stock was $300,000.
Magnet liquidates by transferring 100 shares of Earth to its sole shareholder, Amos, in exchange for all of his
Magnet stock. Amos's basis in his Magnet stock was $150,000. How will this transaction be treated for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected
Answer:
This qualifies as a "Type C" reorganization. Zia recognizes $100,000 gain, Gravity also
recognizes $100,000 gain, but Amos will not recognize his loss.
Response
Feedback: With "Type A" consolidations, the stock exchanged can be common or preferred. The
continuity of interest requirement is met.
Question 16
0 out of 1 points
Perry owns 80% of Weed Corporation and Aimee owns the other 20%. In exchange for all of the Weed
stock, Perry receives 3,400 shares of Grass Corporation common stock (value $70,000), and Aimee receives
50 shares of Grass preferred (value $20,000). Perry also receives $10,000 in bonds. The exchange qualifies
as what type of transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
Acquisitive "Type D" reorganization
Response
Feedback: The exchange qualifies as a "Type A" reorganization. Preferred stock can be used in a "Type A"
reorganization to meet the continuity of interest test. Perry received more than 50% of the
consideration in the form of stock. He recognizes gain to the extent of the bond received
($10,000).
Question 17
0 out of 1 points
Which provision could best be justified as encouraging small business? Answer
Selected Answer:
Percentage depletion
Response Feedback: The S corporation was designed to encourage small business growth.
Question 18
0 out of 1 points
A shareholder bought 2,000 shares of Zee Corporation for $90,000 several years ago. When the stock is
valued at $200,000, Zee redeems these shares in exchange for 6,000 shares of Yea Corporation stock. This
transaction meets the requirements of § 368. Which of the following statements is true with regard to this
transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
Gain or loss cannot be determined because the value of the Yea stock is not given.
Response
Feedback: No gain or loss is recognized on the transaction; therefore, the realized gain of $110,000 is
postponed.
Question 19
1 out of 1 points
All of the following statements are true about gains recognized in a corporate reorganization except: Answer
Selected
Answer:
Corporate shareholders would prefer taxable amounts in a reorganization be classified as a
capital gain.
Response Feedback: Corporations prefer dividend treatment because of the dividends received deduction.
Question 20
0 out of 1 points
Flycatcher Corporation, a C corporation, has two equal individual shareholders, Nancy and Pasqual. In the
current year, Flycatcher earned $200,000 net profit and paid a dividend of $40,000 to each shareholder.
Regardless of any tax consequences resulting from their interests in Flycatcher, Nancy is in the 28%
marginal tax bracket and Pasqual is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. With respect to the current year, which
of the following statements is incorrect? Answer
Selected Answer:
Flycatcher pays corporate tax on $200,000.
Response
Feedback: Dividend distributions are not deductible by a corporation; thus, Flycatcher still incurs
corporate tax on $200,000 even if all profits were distributed to shareholders. A preferential tax
rate of 15% applies to the dividends for both shareholders, resulting in additional tax of $6,000
($40,000 x 15%) for each.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Red Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, has taxable income of $600,000. Among its transactions for the
year are the following: Collection of proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of cash surrender value)$10,000
Realized gain (not recognized) on an involuntary conversion $5,000
Nondeductible fines and penalties $35,000
Disregarding any provision for Federal income taxes, Red Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$575,000
Response
Feedback: To taxable income, the proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of
cash surrender value) is added and the nondeductible fines and penalties are subtracted. The
realized gain (not recognized) on the involuntary conversion has no effect on E & P.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Which provision could best be justified as encouraging small business? Answer
Selected Answer:
S corporation election
Response Feedback: The S corporation was designed to encourage small business growth.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is false regarding a "Type A" reorganization? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The acquiring corporation assumes only those liabilities of the target corporation that are
associated with assets.
Response
Feedback: The acquiring corporation must assume all the liabilities of the target corporation as a
matter of law.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Norma formed Hyacinth Enterprises, a proprietorship, in 2010. In its first year, Hyacinth had operating
income of $200,000 and operating expenses of $100,000. In addition, Hyacinth had a long-term capital loss
of $9,000. Norma, the proprietor of Hyacinth Enterprises, withdrew $50,000 from Hyacinth during the year.
Assuming Norma has no other capital gains or losses, how does this information affect her taxable income
for 2010? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Increases Norma's taxable income by $97,000 ($100,000 ordinary business income - $3,000
long-term capital loss)
Response
Feedback: A proprietorship is not a separate taxable entity. As a proprietor, Norma reports profit or loss
from Hyacinth on her individual return. Norma's taxable income for 2010 will be increased by
$97,000 ($200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000 net ordinary business income - $3,000 capital loss
deduction). The $50,000 she withdrew from Hyacinth has no effect on her taxable income.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Staff, Inc., has taxable income of $10 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$306,000
Response Feedback: $10 million x 9% x 34% = $306,000.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not a reorganization designated under § 368(a)(1)? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above are reorganizations listed in § 368(a)(1)
Response Feedback: Answer (a) is a "Type G," b. is a "Type E," c. is a divisive "Type D," d. is a "Type B. "
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Flycatcher Corporation, a C corporation, has two equal individual shareholders, Nancy and Pasqual. In the
current year, Flycatcher earned $200,000 net profit and paid a dividend of $40,000 to each shareholder.
Regardless of any tax consequences resulting from their interests in Flycatcher, Nancy is in the 28%
marginal tax bracket and Pasqual is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. With respect to the current year, which
of the following statements is incorrect? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Flycatcher can avoid the corporate tax altogether by paying out all $200,000 of net profit as
dividends to the shareholders.
Response
Feedback: Dividend distributions are not deductible by a corporation; thus, Flycatcher still incurs
corporate tax on $200,000 even if all profits were distributed to shareholders. A preferential tax
rate of 15% applies to the dividends for both shareholders, resulting in additional tax of $6,000
($40,000 x 15%) for each.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Beige Corporation (a calendar year taxpayer) has taxable income of $150,000, and its financial records
reflect the following for the year. Federal income taxes paid $75,000
Net operating loss carryforward deducted currently $35,000
Gain recognized this year on an installment sale from a prior year $22,000
Depreciation deducted on tax return (ADS depreciation would have been $5,000) $20,000
Interest income on Iowa state bonds $4,000
Beige Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: To determine E & P, the Federal income tax is subtracted from taxable income and the net
operating loss carryforward is added. The gain recognized currently from the prior year's
installment sale is subtracted. The excess of depreciation deducted on the tax return over ADS
depreciation and the interest from Iowa state bonds are added.
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
Carlos purchased 20% of Target Corporation's stock five years ago for $50,000. In a transaction qualifying
as a "Type A" reorganization, Carlos received $40,000 cash and 6% of Acquiring Corporation's stock
(valued at $60,000) in exchange for his Target stock. Target had $300,000 accumulated earnings and profits
prior to the reorganization. How does Carlos treat the exchange for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
As a sale of stock and recognizes a $10,000 long-term capital loss
Response
Feedback: If Carlos had received only stock, he would have received 10% of Acquiring. Since Carlos
owns 6% of Acquiring, which is less than 80% of the stock he would have owned (6% ÷ 10% is
less than 80%), and he owns less than 50% of Acquiring, he meets the § 302(b)(2)
qualifications for redemption treatment.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Silver Corporation redeems all of Alluvia's 3,000 shares and distributes to her 1,000 shares of Gold
Corporation stock plus $20,000 cash. Alluvia's basis in her 30% interest in Silver is $80,000 and the stock's
market value is $120,000. At the time Silver is acquired by Gold, the accumulated earnings and profits of
Silver are $100,000 and Gold's are $50,000. How does Alluvia treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Alluvia reports a $20,000 recognized dividend.
Response
Feedback: Alluvia has a realized gain of $40,000 ($120,000 - $80,000) and a recognized dividend of
$20,000. Her proportionate share of Silver Corporation's accumulated earnings and profits is in
excess of $20,000 ($100,000 x 30% = $30,000).
Question 11
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements regarding "Type B" reorganizations is true? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The requirement that only voting stock may be used as consideration in a "Type B"
reorganization by the acquiring corporation is a distinct disadvantage.
Response
Feedback: "Type B" reorganizations are considered to be simple rather than complicated (choice a. ).
There is no acquisition of liabilities in a "Type B" reorganization (choice c.). Since the target
corporation continues, there is no acquisition of its loss attributes (choice d. ).
Question 12
1 out of 1 points
One of the tenets of U.S. tax policy is to encourage business development. Which of the following Code
sections does not support this tenet? Answer
Selected Answer:
Section 1031, which allows the exchange of stock of one corporation for stock of another
Response Feedback: Like-kind exchange rules do not apply to exchanges of corporate stock.
Question 13
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an incorrect statement regarding the application of the § 318 stock attribution
rules? Answer
Selected
Answer:
An individual is deemed to own the shares owned by his or her spouse, children,
grandchildren, or parents.
Response
Feedback: All of the statements are correct with respect to the application of the § 318 attribution
rules.
Question 14
1 out of 1 points
All of the following statements are true about gains recognized in a corporate reorganization except: Answer
Selected
Answer:
Corporate shareholders would prefer taxable amounts in a reorganization be classified as a
capital gain.
Response Feedback: Corporations prefer dividend treatment because of the dividends received deduction.
Question 15
1 out of 1 points
Gabriella and Juanita form Luster Corporation. Gabriella transfers cash of $50,000 for 50 shares of stock,
while Juanita transfers a secret process (basis of zero and fair market value of $50,000) for 50 shares of
stock. Answer
Selected Answer:
Neither Gabriella nor Juanita will recognize gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: The transfers are nontaxable to both Gariella and Juanita. Each of them qualifies as a property
transferor and together control the corporation. Therefore, the transfer is subject to tax deferred
treatment under § 351.
Question 16
1 out of 1 points
Yellow Corporation and Green Corporation enter into a "Type A" reorganization. Raul currently holds a 15-
year $100,000 Green bond paying 6% interest. In exchange for his Green bond, Raul receives a 5-year
$125,000 Yellow bond paying 5% interest. Raul is happy with the Yellow bond because, even though it pays
a lower interest rate, the yield provides slightly more interest than the Green bond, and both bonds mature on
the same date. How does Raul treat this transaction on his tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Raul recognizes gain of $25,000 on the exchange ($125,000 - $100,000).
Response
Feedback: Raul recognizes gain to the extent that the principal amounts of the bonds received are in
excess of the bonds given up, or $25,000.
Question 17
0 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following is a characteristic of the DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: As long as the domestic portion of the production is substantial, DPGR results (choice d. ).
DPAD applies to most entities including S corporations (choice a. ). Not only can DPGR result
from the performance of engineering and architectural services, but certain embedded services
can qualify (choice c.). There are no restrictions or requirements on where the manufactured
goods have to be sent or sold (choice b. ).
Question 18
1 out of 1 points
Domingo and Juan, brothers, each own 300 shares in White Corporation (E & P of $700,000). Heron
Partnership owns the remaining 400 shares of stock in White Corporation, and Juan has a 25% interest in
Heron Partnership. White Corporation redeems 200 shares of Juan's stock for $120,000. Juan paid $150 a
share for the stock five years ago. With respect to the redemption: Answer
Selected Answer:
Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000.
Response
Feedback: The redemption meets both tests of § 302(b)(2) and qualifies for sale or exchange treatment.
Before and after the redemption, Juan is deemed to own a proportionate number of the White
shares owned by Heron Partnership, but none of the shares owned by Domingo. (The family
attribution rules do not include siblings.) Thus, before the redemption, Juan has a 40% interest
in White: 300 shares directly plus 100 shares indirectly from Heron (25% x 400). After the
redemption, Juan owns 25% of the stock in White Corporation: [200 shares (100 directly plus
100 indirectly from Heron) x 800 postredemption shares outstanding]. The 25% ownership
interest is less than 50% of the total voting power and less than 80% of Juan's original
ownership [25% is less than 32% (80% x 40%)]. Thus, the distribution is a disproportionate
redemption and Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000 [$120,000 (amount realized) -
$30,000 (stock basis)].
Question 19
1 out of 1 points
Perry owns 80% of Weed Corporation and Aimee owns the other 20%. In exchange for all of the Weed
stock, Perry receives 3,400 shares of Grass Corporation common stock (value $70,000), and Aimee receives
50 shares of Grass preferred (value $20,000). Perry also receives $10,000 in bonds. The exchange qualifies
as what type of transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
"Type A" reorganization
Response
Feedback: The exchange qualifies as a "Type A" reorganization. Preferred stock can be used in a "Type A"
reorganization to meet the continuity of interest test. Perry received more than 50% of the
consideration in the form of stock. He recognizes gain to the extent of the bond received
($10,000).
Question 20
1 out of 1 points
Target Corporation is merging into Acquiring Corporation under state law requirements. Target has 3,000
shares outstanding, with a value of $100 per share. Joey, one of Target's shareholders, exchanges his 500
Target shares, for which he paid $80 per share, for 1,000 shares of Crow stock, valued at $30 per share, and
$5,000 cash. Acquiring owns 40% of Crow stock. How does Joey treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Joey has a recognized loss of $5,000.
Response
Feedback: This is a taxable transaction because Joey received no stock in Acquiring in exchange for his
stock in Target. Acquiring's ownership of Crow is an investment. Thus, Crow is not a party to
the reorganization. 500 x $80 = $40,000 basis - $30,000 Crow stock - $5,000 cash = $5,000 loss
for Joey.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Flycatcher Corporation, a C corporation, has two equal individual shareholders, Nancy and Pasqual. In the
current year, Flycatcher earned $200,000 net profit and paid a dividend of $40,000 to each shareholder.
Regardless of any tax consequences resulting from their interests in Flycatcher, Nancy is in the 28%
marginal tax bracket and Pasqual is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. With respect to the current year, which
of the following statements is incorrect? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Flycatcher can avoid the corporate tax altogether by paying out all $200,000 of net profit as
dividends to the shareholders.
Response
Feedback: Dividend distributions are not deductible by a corporation; thus, Flycatcher still incurs
corporate tax on $200,000 even if all profits were distributed to shareholders. A preferential tax
rate of 15% applies to the dividends for both shareholders, resulting in additional tax of $6,000
($40,000 x 15%) for each.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Gabriella and Juanita form Luster Corporation. Gabriella transfers cash of $50,000 for 50 shares of stock,
while Juanita transfers a secret process (basis of zero and fair market value of $50,000) for 50 shares of
stock. Answer
Selected Answer:
Neither Gabriella nor Juanita will recognize gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: The transfers are nontaxable to both Gariella and Juanita. Each of them qualifies as a property
transferor and together control the corporation. Therefore, the transfer is subject to tax deferred
treatment under § 351.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Yellow Corporation and Green Corporation enter into a "Type A" reorganization. Raul currently holds a 15-
year $100,000 Green bond paying 6% interest. In exchange for his Green bond, Raul receives a 5-year
$125,000 Yellow bond paying 5% interest. Raul is happy with the Yellow bond because, even though it pays
a lower interest rate, the yield provides slightly more interest than the Green bond, and both bonds mature on
the same date. How does Raul treat this transaction on his tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Raul recognizes gain of $25,000 on the exchange ($125,000 - $100,000).
Response
Feedback: Raul recognizes gain to the extent that the principal amounts of the bonds received are in
excess of the bonds given up, or $25,000.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
All of the following statements are true about gains recognized in a corporate reorganization except: Answer
Selected
Answer:
Corporate shareholders would prefer taxable amounts in a reorganization be classified as a
capital gain.
Response Feedback: Corporations prefer dividend treatment because of the dividends received deduction.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements regarding "Type B" reorganizations is true? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The requirement that only voting stock may be used as consideration in a "Type B"
reorganization by the acquiring corporation is a distinct disadvantage.
Response
Feedback: "Type B" reorganizations are considered to be simple rather than complicated (choice a. ).
There is no acquisition of liabilities in a "Type B" reorganization (choice c.). Since the target
corporation continues, there is no acquisition of its loss attributes (choice d. ).
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Jupiter Corporation acquires all of Titian Corporation's stock in exchange for its voting stock. Iris received
1,000 shares of Jupiter valued at $50,000 for her 8,000 shares of Titian that cost Iris $100,000 five years ago.
In addition to the Jupiter stock, she receives a $30,000 bond. How does Iris treat this transaction for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Iris recognizes a loss of $20,000. Her Jupiter stock basis is $80,000.
Response
Feedback: Iris has a realized loss of $20,000; however, losses are not recognized in reorganizations. Her
basis in her Jupiter stock will be $70,000 ($100,000 - $30,000 bond received).
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Staff, Inc., has taxable income of $10 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$306,000
Response Feedback: $10 million x 9% x 34% = $306,000.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Red Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, has taxable income of $600,000. Among its transactions for the
year are the following: Collection of proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of cash surrender value)$10,000
Realized gain (not recognized) on an involuntary conversion $5,000
Nondeductible fines and penalties $35,000
Disregarding any provision for Federal income taxes, Red Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$575,000
Response
Feedback: To taxable income, the proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of
cash surrender value) is added and the nondeductible fines and penalties are subtracted. The
realized gain (not recognized) on the involuntary conversion has no effect on E & P.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Norma formed Hyacinth Enterprises, a proprietorship, in 2010. In its first year, Hyacinth had operating
income of $200,000 and operating expenses of $100,000. In addition, Hyacinth had a long-term capital loss
of $9,000. Norma, the proprietor of Hyacinth Enterprises, withdrew $50,000 from Hyacinth during the year.
Assuming Norma has no other capital gains or losses, how does this information affect her taxable income
for 2010? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Increases Norma's taxable income by $97,000 ($100,000 ordinary business income - $3,000
long-term capital loss)
Response
Feedback: A proprietorship is not a separate taxable entity. As a proprietor, Norma reports profit or loss
from Hyacinth on her individual return. Norma's taxable income for 2010 will be increased by
$97,000 ($200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000 net ordinary business income - $3,000 capital loss
deduction). The $50,000 she withdrew from Hyacinth has no effect on her taxable income.
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following is a characteristic of the DPAD? Answer
Selected Answer:
Not applicable in situations involving S corporations
Response
Feedback: As long as the domestic portion of the production is substantial, DPGR results (choice d. ).
DPAD applies to most entities including S corporations (choice a. ). Not only can DPGR result
from the performance of engineering and architectural services, but certain embedded services
can qualify (choice c.). There are no restrictions or requirements on where the manufactured
goods have to be sent or sold (choice b. ).
Question 11
1 out of 1 points
Which provision could best be justified as encouraging small business? Answer
Selected Answer:
S corporation election
Response Feedback: The S corporation was designed to encourage small business growth.
Question 12
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not a reorganization designated under § 368(a)(1)? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above are reorganizations listed in § 368(a)(1)
Response Feedback: Answer (a) is a "Type G," b. is a "Type E," c. is a divisive "Type D," d. is a "Type B. "
Question 13
1 out of 1 points
Perry owns 80% of Weed Corporation and Aimee owns the other 20%. In exchange for all of the Weed
stock, Perry receives 3,400 shares of Grass Corporation common stock (value $70,000), and Aimee receives
50 shares of Grass preferred (value $20,000). Perry also receives $10,000 in bonds. The exchange qualifies
as what type of transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
"Type A" reorganization
Response
Feedback: The exchange qualifies as a "Type A" reorganization. Preferred stock can be used in a "Type A"
reorganization to meet the continuity of interest test. Perry received more than 50% of the
consideration in the form of stock. He recognizes gain to the extent of the bond received
($10,000).
Question 14
1 out of 1 points
Domingo and Juan, brothers, each own 300 shares in White Corporation (E & P of $700,000). Heron
Partnership owns the remaining 400 shares of stock in White Corporation, and Juan has a 25% interest in
Heron Partnership. White Corporation redeems 200 shares of Juan's stock for $120,000. Juan paid $150 a
share for the stock five years ago. With respect to the redemption: Answer
Selected Answer:
Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000.
Response
Feedback: The redemption meets both tests of § 302(b)(2) and qualifies for sale or exchange treatment.
Before and after the redemption, Juan is deemed to own a proportionate number of the White
shares owned by Heron Partnership, but none of the shares owned by Domingo. (The family
attribution rules do not include siblings.) Thus, before the redemption, Juan has a 40% interest
in White: 300 shares directly plus 100 shares indirectly from Heron (25% x 400). After the
redemption, Juan owns 25% of the stock in White Corporation: [200 shares (100 directly plus
100 indirectly from Heron) x 800 postredemption shares outstanding]. The 25% ownership
interest is less than 50% of the total voting power and less than 80% of Juan's original
ownership [25% is less than 32% (80% x 40%)]. Thus, the distribution is a disproportionate
redemption and Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000 [$120,000 (amount realized) -
$30,000 (stock basis)].
Question 15
1 out of 1 points
Carlos purchased 20% of Target Corporation's stock five years ago for $50,000. In a transaction qualifying
as a "Type A" reorganization, Carlos received $40,000 cash and 6% of Acquiring Corporation's stock
(valued at $60,000) in exchange for his Target stock. Target had $300,000 accumulated earnings and profits
prior to the reorganization. How does Carlos treat the exchange for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
As a stock redemption and recognizes a $40,000 long-term capital gain
Response
Feedback: If Carlos had received only stock, he would have received 10% of Acquiring. Since Carlos
owns 6% of Acquiring, which is less than 80% of the stock he would have owned (6% ÷ 10% is
less than 80%), and he owns less than 50% of Acquiring, he meets the § 302(b)(2)
qualifications for redemption treatment.
Question 16
0 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation redeems all of its voting common stock. Cardinal then exchanges this redeemed stock
with Wren corporation for 40% of Wren's voting common and nonvoting preferred stock. The Wren stock
was distributed to the Cardinal shareholders. After the transaction, both Cardinal and Wren corporations still
exist. The former Cardinal shareholders are now shareholders of Wren. This transaction qualifies as a(n): Answer
Selected Answer:
"Type C" reorganization
Response
Feedback: This does not qualify as a "Type B" reorganization because Wren used preferred stock as well
as voting stock in the exchange. The acquiring corporation can use only voting stock. For the
other types of reorganizations, assets of one of the corporations would have to be transferred to
the other.
Question 17
1 out of 1 points
Silver Corporation redeems all of Alluvia's 3,000 shares and distributes to her 1,000 shares of Gold
Corporation stock plus $20,000 cash. Alluvia's basis in her 30% interest in Silver is $80,000 and the stock's
market value is $120,000. At the time Silver is acquired by Gold, the accumulated earnings and profits of
Silver are $100,000 and Gold's are $50,000. How does Alluvia treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Alluvia reports a $20,000 recognized dividend.
Response
Feedback: Alluvia has a realized gain of $40,000 ($120,000 - $80,000) and a recognized dividend of
$20,000. Her proportionate share of Silver Corporation's accumulated earnings and profits is in
excess of $20,000 ($100,000 x 30% = $30,000).
Question 18
0 out of 1 points
Xian Corporation and Win Corporation would like to combine into one entity. Xian exchanges 40% of its
common and preferred stock plus $200,000 cash for 60% of Win's assets and liabilities. Win distributes the
Xian stock, cash, unwanted assets, and liabilities to its shareholders in exchange for their outstanding stock.
Win then liquidates. Answer
Selected Answer:
This restructuring will qualify as a "Type B" reorganization.
Response
Feedback: This restructuring does not qualify as a "Type A" statutory merger because all of the Win
liabilities were not transferred to Xian. A stock for stock exchange is necessary for a "Type B"
reorganization, which was not the case here. The transaction does not qualify as a "Type C"
reorganization because at least 80% of Win's assets are not obtained with voting stock. The
restructuring is not an acquisitive "Type D" reorganization because Xian is transferring stock to
Win, not assets. Therefore, this transaction is not one of the reorganizations provided in § 368.
Question 19
1 out of 1 points
One of the tenets of U.S. tax policy is to encourage business development. Which of the following Code
sections does not support this tenet? Answer
Selected Answer:
Section 1031, which allows the exchange of stock of one corporation for stock of another
Response Feedback: Like-kind exchange rules do not apply to exchanges of corporate stock.
Question 20
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is false regarding a "Type A" reorganization? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The acquiring corporation assumes only those liabilities of the target corporation that are
associated with assets.
Response
Feedback: The acquiring corporation must assume all the liabilities of the target corporation as a
matter of law.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is false regarding a "Type A" reorganization? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The acquiring corporation assumes only those liabilities of the target corporation that are
associated with assets.
Response
Feedback: The acquiring corporation must assume all the liabilities of the target corporation as a
matter of law.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Gabriella and Juanita form Luster Corporation. Gabriella transfers cash of $50,000 for 50 shares of stock,
while Juanita transfers a secret process (basis of zero and fair market value of $50,000) for 50 shares of
stock. Answer
Selected Answer:
Neither Gabriella nor Juanita will recognize gain on the transfer.
Response
Feedback: The transfers are nontaxable to both Gariella and Juanita. Each of them qualifies as a property
transferor and together control the corporation. Therefore, the transfer is subject to tax deferred
treatment under § 351.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Carlos purchased 20% of Target Corporation's stock five years ago for $50,000. In a transaction qualifying
as a "Type A" reorganization, Carlos received $40,000 cash and 6% of Acquiring Corporation's stock
(valued at $60,000) in exchange for his Target stock. Target had $300,000 accumulated earnings and profits
prior to the reorganization. How does Carlos treat the exchange for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
As a stock redemption and recognizes a $40,000 long-term capital gain
Response
Feedback: If Carlos had received only stock, he would have received 10% of Acquiring. Since Carlos
owns 6% of Acquiring, which is less than 80% of the stock he would have owned (6% ÷ 10% is
less than 80%), and he owns less than 50% of Acquiring, he meets the § 302(b)(2)
qualifications for redemption treatment.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following statements regarding "Type B" reorganizations is true? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The requirement that only voting stock may be used as consideration in a "Type B"
reorganization by the acquiring corporation is a distinct disadvantage.
Response
Feedback: "Type B" reorganizations are considered to be simple rather than complicated (choice a. ).
There is no acquisition of liabilities in a "Type B" reorganization (choice c.). Since the target
corporation continues, there is no acquisition of its loss attributes (choice d. ).
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation redeems all of its voting common stock. Cardinal then exchanges this redeemed stock
with Wren corporation for 40% of Wren's voting common and nonvoting preferred stock. The Wren stock
was distributed to the Cardinal shareholders. After the transaction, both Cardinal and Wren corporations still
exist. The former Cardinal shareholders are now shareholders of Wren. This transaction qualifies as a(n): Answer
Selected Answer:
"Type A" reorganization
Response
Feedback: This does not qualify as a "Type B" reorganization because Wren used preferred stock as well
as voting stock in the exchange. The acquiring corporation can use only voting stock. For the
other types of reorganizations, assets of one of the corporations would have to be transferred to
the other.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Jupiter Corporation acquires all of Titian Corporation's stock in exchange for its voting stock. Iris received
1,000 shares of Jupiter valued at $50,000 for her 8,000 shares of Titian that cost Iris $100,000 five years ago.
In addition to the Jupiter stock, she receives a $30,000 bond. How does Iris treat this transaction for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Iris has a realized loss of $20,000; however, losses are not recognized in reorganizations. Her
basis in her Jupiter stock will be $70,000 ($100,000 - $30,000 bond received).
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Silver Corporation redeems all of Alluvia's 3,000 shares and distributes to her 1,000 shares of Gold
Corporation stock plus $20,000 cash. Alluvia's basis in her 30% interest in Silver is $80,000 and the stock's
market value is $120,000. At the time Silver is acquired by Gold, the accumulated earnings and profits of
Silver are $100,000 and Gold's are $50,000. How does Alluvia treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Alluvia reports a $20,000 recognized dividend.
Response
Feedback: Alluvia has a realized gain of $40,000 ($120,000 - $80,000) and a recognized dividend of
$20,000. Her proportionate share of Silver Corporation's accumulated earnings and profits is in
excess of $20,000 ($100,000 x 30% = $30,000).
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Beige Corporation (a calendar year taxpayer) has taxable income of $150,000, and its financial records
reflect the following for the year. Federal income taxes paid $75,000
Net operating loss carryforward deducted currently $35,000
Gain recognized this year on an installment sale from a prior year $22,000
Depreciation deducted on tax return (ADS depreciation would have been $5,000) $20,000
Interest income on Iowa state bonds $4,000
Beige Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$107,000
Response
Feedback: To determine E & P, the Federal income tax is subtracted from taxable income and the net
operating loss carryforward is added. The gain recognized currently from the prior year's
installment sale is subtracted. The excess of depreciation deducted on the tax return over ADS
depreciation and the interest from Iowa state bonds are added.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Domingo and Juan, brothers, each own 300 shares in White Corporation (E & P of $700,000). Heron
Partnership owns the remaining 400 shares of stock in White Corporation, and Juan has a 25% interest in
Heron Partnership. White Corporation redeems 200 shares of Juan's stock for $120,000. Juan paid $150 a
share for the stock five years ago. With respect to the redemption: Answer
Selected Answer:
Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000.
Response
Feedback: The redemption meets both tests of § 302(b)(2) and qualifies for sale or exchange treatment.
Before and after the redemption, Juan is deemed to own a proportionate number of the White
shares owned by Heron Partnership, but none of the shares owned by Domingo. (The family
attribution rules do not include siblings.) Thus, before the redemption, Juan has a 40% interest
in White: 300 shares directly plus 100 shares indirectly from Heron (25% x 400). After the
redemption, Juan owns 25% of the stock in White Corporation: [200 shares (100 directly plus
100 indirectly from Heron) x 800 postredemption shares outstanding]. The 25% ownership
interest is less than 50% of the total voting power and less than 80% of Juan's original
ownership [25% is less than 32% (80% x 40%)]. Thus, the distribution is a disproportionate
redemption and Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000 [$120,000 (amount realized) -
$30,000 (stock basis)].
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Xian Corporation and Win Corporation would like to combine into one entity. Xian exchanges 40% of its
common and preferred stock plus $200,000 cash for 60% of Win's assets and liabilities. Win distributes the
Xian stock, cash, unwanted assets, and liabilities to its shareholders in exchange for their outstanding stock.
Win then liquidates. Answer
Selected Answer:
This does not qualify as a reorganization under § 368.
Response
Feedback: This restructuring does not qualify as a "Type A" statutory merger because all of the Win
liabilities were not transferred to Xian. A stock for stock exchange is necessary for a "Type B"
reorganization, which was not the case here. The transaction does not qualify as a "Type C"
reorganization because at least 80% of Win's assets are not obtained with voting stock. The
restructuring is not an acquisitive "Type D" reorganization because Xian is transferring stock to
Win, not assets. Therefore, this transaction is not one of the reorganizations provided in § 368.
Question 11
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not a reorganization designated under § 368(a)(1)? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above are reorganizations listed in § 368(a)(1)
Response Feedback: Answer (a) is a "Type G," b. is a "Type E," c. is a divisive "Type D," d. is a "Type B. "
Question 12
1 out of 1 points
One of the tenets of U.S. tax policy is to encourage business development. Which of the following Code
sections does not support this tenet? Answer
Selected Answer:
Section 1031, which allows the exchange of stock of one corporation for stock of another
Response Feedback: Like-kind exchange rules do not apply to exchanges of corporate stock.
Question 13
1 out of 1 points
Norma formed Hyacinth Enterprises, a proprietorship, in 2010. In its first year, Hyacinth had operating
income of $200,000 and operating expenses of $100,000. In addition, Hyacinth had a long-term capital loss
of $9,000. Norma, the proprietor of Hyacinth Enterprises, withdrew $50,000 from Hyacinth during the year.
Assuming Norma has no other capital gains or losses, how does this information affect her taxable income
for 2010? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Increases Norma's taxable income by $97,000 ($100,000 ordinary business income - $3,000
long-term capital loss)
Response
Feedback: A proprietorship is not a separate taxable entity. As a proprietor, Norma reports profit or loss
from Hyacinth on her individual return. Norma's taxable income for 2010 will be increased by
$97,000 ($200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000 net ordinary business income - $3,000 capital loss
deduction). The $50,000 she withdrew from Hyacinth has no effect on her taxable income.
Question 14
1 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following is a characteristic of the DPAD? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Can sometimes apply when some of the components of a product are manufactured in foreign
countries
Response
Feedback: As long as the domestic portion of the production is substantial, DPGR results (choice d. ).
DPAD applies to most entities including S corporations (choice a. ). Not only can DPGR result
from the performance of engineering and architectural services, but certain embedded services
can qualify (choice c.). There are no restrictions or requirements on where the manufactured
goods have to be sent or sold (choice b. ).
Question 15
1 out of 1 points
Flycatcher Corporation, a C corporation, has two equal individual shareholders, Nancy and Pasqual. In the
current year, Flycatcher earned $200,000 net profit and paid a dividend of $40,000 to each shareholder.
Regardless of any tax consequences resulting from their interests in Flycatcher, Nancy is in the 28%
marginal tax bracket and Pasqual is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. With respect to the current year, which
of the following statements is incorrect? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Flycatcher can avoid the corporate tax altogether by paying out all $200,000 of net profit as
dividends to the shareholders.
Response
Feedback: Dividend distributions are not deductible by a corporation; thus, Flycatcher still incurs
corporate tax on $200,000 even if all profits were distributed to shareholders. A preferential tax
rate of 15% applies to the dividends for both shareholders, resulting in additional tax of $6,000
($40,000 x 15%) for each.
Question 16
1 out of 1 points
Perry owns 80% of Weed Corporation and Aimee owns the other 20%. In exchange for all of the Weed
stock, Perry receives 3,400 shares of Grass Corporation common stock (value $70,000), and Aimee receives
50 shares of Grass preferred (value $20,000). Perry also receives $10,000 in bonds. The exchange qualifies
as what type of transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
"Type A" reorganization
Response
Feedback: The exchange qualifies as a "Type A" reorganization. Preferred stock can be used in a "Type A"
reorganization to meet the continuity of interest test. Perry received more than 50% of the
consideration in the form of stock. He recognizes gain to the extent of the bond received
($10,000).
Question 17
1 out of 1 points
A shareholder bought 2,000 shares of Zee Corporation for $90,000 several years ago. When the stock is
valued at $200,000, Zee redeems these shares in exchange for 6,000 shares of Yea Corporation stock. This
transaction meets the requirements of § 368. Which of the following statements is true with regard to this
transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
The shareholder has a postponed gain of $110,000.
Response
Feedback: No gain or loss is recognized on the transaction; therefore, the realized gain of $110,000 is
postponed.
Question 18
1 out of 1 points
Staff, Inc., has taxable income of $10 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$306,000
Response Feedback: $10 million x 9% x 34% = $306,000.
Question 19
1 out of 1 points
Yellow Corporation and Green Corporation enter into a "Type A" reorganization. Raul currently holds a 15-
year $100,000 Green bond paying 6% interest. In exchange for his Green bond, Raul receives a 5-year
$125,000 Yellow bond paying 5% interest. Raul is happy with the Yellow bond because, even though it pays
a lower interest rate, the yield provides slightly more interest than the Green bond, and both bonds mature on
the same date. How does Raul treat this transaction on his tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Raul recognizes gain of $25,000 on the exchange ($125,000 - $100,000).
Response
Feedback: Raul recognizes gain to the extent that the principal amounts of the bonds received are in
excess of the bonds given up, or $25,000.
Question 20
1 out of 1 points
Which provision could best be justified as encouraging small business? Answer
Selected Answer:
S corporation election
Response Feedback: The S corporation was designed to encourage small business growth.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Silver Corporation redeems all of Alluvia's 3,000 shares and distributes to her 1,000 shares of Gold
Corporation stock plus $20,000 cash. Alluvia's basis in her 30% interest in Silver is $80,000 and the stock's
market value is $120,000. At the time Silver is acquired by Gold, the accumulated earnings and profits of
Silver are $100,000 and Gold's are $50,000. How does Alluvia treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Alluvia reports a $20,000 recognized dividend.
Response
Feedback: Alluvia has a realized gain of $40,000 ($120,000 - $80,000) and a recognized dividend of
$20,000. Her proportionate share of Silver Corporation's accumulated earnings and profits is in
excess of $20,000 ($100,000 x 30% = $30,000).
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Which provision could best be justified as encouraging small business? Answer
Selected Answer:
S corporation election
Response Feedback: The S corporation was designed to encourage small business growth.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is false regarding a "Type A" reorganization? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The acquiring corporation assumes only those liabilities of the target corporation that are
associated with assets.
Response
Feedback: The acquiring corporation must assume all the liabilities of the target corporation as a
matter of law.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Beige Corporation (a calendar year taxpayer) has taxable income of $150,000, and its financial records
reflect the following for the year. Federal income taxes paid $75,000
Net operating loss carryforward deducted currently $35,000
Gain recognized this year on an installment sale from a prior year $22,000
Depreciation deducted on tax return (ADS depreciation would have been $5,000) $20,000
Interest income on Iowa state bonds $4,000
Beige Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$107,000
Response
Feedback: To determine E & P, the Federal income tax is subtracted from taxable income and the net
operating loss carryforward is added. The gain recognized currently from the prior year's
installment sale is subtracted. The excess of depreciation deducted on the tax return over ADS
depreciation and the interest from Iowa state bonds are added.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
All of the following statements are true about gains recognized in a corporate reorganization except: Answer
Selected
Answer:
Corporate shareholders would prefer taxable amounts in a reorganization be classified as a
capital gain.
Response Feedback: Corporations prefer dividend treatment because of the dividends received deduction.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
A shareholder bought 2,000 shares of Zee Corporation for $90,000 several years ago. When the stock is
valued at $200,000, Zee redeems these shares in exchange for 6,000 shares of Yea Corporation stock. This
transaction meets the requirements of § 368. Which of the following statements is true with regard to this
transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
The shareholder has a postponed gain of $110,000.
Response
Feedback: No gain or loss is recognized on the transaction; therefore, the realized gain of $110,000 is
postponed.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Domingo and Juan, brothers, each own 300 shares in White Corporation (E & P of $700,000). Heron
Partnership owns the remaining 400 shares of stock in White Corporation, and Juan has a 25% interest in
Heron Partnership. White Corporation redeems 200 shares of Juan's stock for $120,000. Juan paid $150 a
share for the stock five years ago. With respect to the redemption: Answer
Selected Answer:
Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000.
Response
Feedback: The redemption meets both tests of § 302(b)(2) and qualifies for sale or exchange treatment.
Before and after the redemption, Juan is deemed to own a proportionate number of the White
shares owned by Heron Partnership, but none of the shares owned by Domingo. (The family
attribution rules do not include siblings.) Thus, before the redemption, Juan has a 40% interest
in White: 300 shares directly plus 100 shares indirectly from Heron (25% x 400). After the
redemption, Juan owns 25% of the stock in White Corporation: [200 shares (100 directly plus
100 indirectly from Heron) x 800 postredemption shares outstanding]. The 25% ownership
interest is less than 50% of the total voting power and less than 80% of Juan's original
ownership [25% is less than 32% (80% x 40%)]. Thus, the distribution is a disproportionate
redemption and Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000 [$120,000 (amount realized) -
$30,000 (stock basis)].
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation redeems all of its voting common stock. Cardinal then exchanges this redeemed stock
with Wren corporation for 40% of Wren's voting common and nonvoting preferred stock. The Wren stock
was distributed to the Cardinal shareholders. After the transaction, both Cardinal and Wren corporations still
exist. The former Cardinal shareholders are now shareholders of Wren. This transaction qualifies as a(n): Answer
Selected Answer:
Acquisitive "Type D" reorganization
Response
Feedback: This does not qualify as a "Type B" reorganization because Wren used preferred stock as well
as voting stock in the exchange. The acquiring corporation can use only voting stock. For the
other types of reorganizations, assets of one of the corporations would have to be transferred to
the other.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not a reorganization designated under § 368(a)(1)? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above are reorganizations listed in § 368(a)(1)
Response Feedback: Answer (a) is a "Type G," b. is a "Type E," c. is a divisive "Type D," d. is a "Type B. "
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Norma formed Hyacinth Enterprises, a proprietorship, in 2010. In its first year, Hyacinth had operating
income of $200,000 and operating expenses of $100,000. In addition, Hyacinth had a long-term capital loss
of $9,000. Norma, the proprietor of Hyacinth Enterprises, withdrew $50,000 from Hyacinth during the year.
Assuming Norma has no other capital gains or losses, how does this information affect her taxable income
for 2010? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Increases Norma's taxable income by $97,000 ($100,000 ordinary business income - $3,000
long-term capital loss)
Response
Feedback: A proprietorship is not a separate taxable entity. As a proprietor, Norma reports profit or loss
from Hyacinth on her individual return. Norma's taxable income for 2010 will be increased by
$97,000 ($200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000 net ordinary business income - $3,000 capital loss
deduction). The $50,000 she withdrew from Hyacinth has no effect on her taxable income.
Question 11
1 out of 1 points
Red Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, has taxable income of $600,000. Among its transactions for the
year are the following: Collection of proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of cash surrender value)$10,000
Realized gain (not recognized) on an involuntary conversion $5,000
Nondeductible fines and penalties $35,000
Disregarding any provision for Federal income taxes, Red Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$575,000
Response
Feedback: To taxable income, the proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of
cash surrender value) is added and the nondeductible fines and penalties are subtracted. The
realized gain (not recognized) on the involuntary conversion has no effect on E & P.
Question 12
1 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following is a characteristic of the DPAD? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Can sometimes apply when some of the components of a product are manufactured in foreign
countries
Response
Feedback: As long as the domestic portion of the production is substantial, DPGR results (choice d. ).
DPAD applies to most entities including S corporations (choice a. ). Not only can DPGR result
from the performance of engineering and architectural services, but certain embedded services
can qualify (choice c.). There are no restrictions or requirements on where the manufactured
goods have to be sent or sold (choice b. ).
Question 13
1 out of 1 points
Yellow Corporation and Green Corporation enter into a "Type A" reorganization. Raul currently holds a 15-
year $100,000 Green bond paying 6% interest. In exchange for his Green bond, Raul receives a 5-year
$125,000 Yellow bond paying 5% interest. Raul is happy with the Yellow bond because, even though it pays
a lower interest rate, the yield provides slightly more interest than the Green bond, and both bonds mature on
the same date. How does Raul treat this transaction on his tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Raul recognizes gain of $25,000 on the exchange ($125,000 - $100,000).
Response
Feedback: Raul recognizes gain to the extent that the principal amounts of the bonds received are in
excess of the bonds given up, or $25,000.
Question 14
1 out of 1 points
Jupiter Corporation acquires all of Titian Corporation's stock in exchange for its voting stock. Iris received
1,000 shares of Jupiter valued at $50,000 for her 8,000 shares of Titian that cost Iris $100,000 five years ago.
In addition to the Jupiter stock, she receives a $30,000 bond. How does Iris treat this transaction for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Iris has a realized loss of $20,000; however, losses are not recognized in reorganizations. Her
basis in her Jupiter stock will be $70,000 ($100,000 - $30,000 bond received).
Question 15
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an incorrect statement regarding the application of the § 318 stock attribution
rules? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above.
Response
Feedback: All of the statements are correct with respect to the application of the § 318 attribution
rules.
Question 16
1 out of 1 points
Flycatcher Corporation, a C corporation, has two equal individual shareholders, Nancy and Pasqual. In the
current year, Flycatcher earned $200,000 net profit and paid a dividend of $40,000 to each shareholder.
Regardless of any tax consequences resulting from their interests in Flycatcher, Nancy is in the 28%
marginal tax bracket and Pasqual is in the 35% marginal tax bracket. With respect to the current year, which
of the following statements is incorrect? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Flycatcher can avoid the corporate tax altogether by paying out all $200,000 of net profit as
dividends to the shareholders.
Response
Feedback: Dividend distributions are not deductible by a corporation; thus, Flycatcher still incurs
corporate tax on $200,000 even if all profits were distributed to shareholders. A preferential tax
rate of 15% applies to the dividends for both shareholders, resulting in additional tax of $6,000
($40,000 x 15%) for each.
Question 17
1 out of 1 points
Carlos purchased 20% of Target Corporation's stock five years ago for $50,000. In a transaction qualifying
as a "Type A" reorganization, Carlos received $40,000 cash and 6% of Acquiring Corporation's stock
(valued at $60,000) in exchange for his Target stock. Target had $300,000 accumulated earnings and profits
prior to the reorganization. How does Carlos treat the exchange for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
As a stock redemption and recognizes a $40,000 long-term capital gain
Response
Feedback: If Carlos had received only stock, he would have received 10% of Acquiring. Since Carlos
owns 6% of Acquiring, which is less than 80% of the stock he would have owned (6% ÷ 10% is
less than 80%), and he owns less than 50% of Acquiring, he meets the § 302(b)(2)
qualifications for redemption treatment.
Question 18
1 out of 1 points
Xian Corporation and Win Corporation would like to combine into one entity. Xian exchanges 40% of its
common and preferred stock plus $200,000 cash for 60% of Win's assets and liabilities. Win distributes the
Xian stock, cash, unwanted assets, and liabilities to its shareholders in exchange for their outstanding stock.
Win then liquidates. Answer
Selected Answer:
This does not qualify as a reorganization under § 368.
Response
Feedback: This restructuring does not qualify as a "Type A" statutory merger because all of the Win
liabilities were not transferred to Xian. A stock for stock exchange is necessary for a "Type B"
reorganization, which was not the case here. The transaction does not qualify as a "Type C"
reorganization because at least 80% of Win's assets are not obtained with voting stock. The
restructuring is not an acquisitive "Type D" reorganization because Xian is transferring stock to
Win, not assets. Therefore, this transaction is not one of the reorganizations provided in § 368.
Question 19
1 out of 1 points
Staff, Inc., has taxable income of $10 million in 2010. What is the maximum DPAD tax savings for this C
corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
$306,000
Response Feedback: $10 million x 9% x 34% = $306,000.
Question 20
1 out of 1 points
Gravity Corporation creates Earth Corporation. It transfers most of its assets (net value $900,000) to Earth.
At approximately the same time, Magnet Corporation also transfers all of its assets (net value $90,000) to
Earth. Gravity liquidates by transferring its remaining assets, $100,000 cash and 1,000 shares of Earth, to its
sole shareholder, Zia, in exchange for all of her Gravity stock. Zia's basis in her Gravity stock was $300,000.
Magnet liquidates by transferring 100 shares of Earth to its sole shareholder, Amos, in exchange for all of his
Magnet stock. Amos's basis in his Magnet stock was $150,000. How will this transaction be treated for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected
Answer:
This qualifies as a "Type A" reorganization. Zia recognizes $100,000 gain, but Amos will not
recognize any loss.
Response
Feedback: With "Type A" consolidations, the stock exchanged can be common or preferred. The
continuity of interest requirement is met.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
One of the tenets of U.S. tax policy is to encourage business development. Which of the following Code
sections does not support this tenet? Answer
Selected Answer:
Section 1031, which allows the exchange of stock of one corporation for stock of another
Response Feedback: Like-kind exchange rules do not apply to exchanges of corporate stock.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Gravity Corporation creates Earth Corporation. It transfers most of its assets (net value $900,000) to Earth.
At approximately the same time, Magnet Corporation also transfers all of its assets (net value $90,000) to
Earth. Gravity liquidates by transferring its remaining assets, $100,000 cash and 1,000 shares of Earth, to its
sole shareholder, Zia, in exchange for all of her Gravity stock. Zia's basis in her Gravity stock was $300,000.
Magnet liquidates by transferring 100 shares of Earth to its sole shareholder, Amos, in exchange for all of his
Magnet stock. Amos's basis in his Magnet stock was $150,000. How will this transaction be treated for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected
Answer:
This qualifies as a "Type A" reorganization. Zia recognizes $100,000 gain, but Amos will not
recognize any loss.
Response
Feedback: With "Type A" consolidations, the stock exchanged can be common or preferred. The
continuity of interest requirement is met.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is not a reorganization designated under § 368(a)(1)? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above are reorganizations listed in § 368(a)(1)
Response Feedback: Answer (a) is a "Type G," b. is a "Type E," c. is a divisive "Type D," d. is a "Type B. "
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an incorrect statement regarding the application of the § 318 stock attribution
rules? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above.
Response
Feedback: All of the statements are correct with respect to the application of the § 318 attribution
rules.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Jupiter Corporation acquires all of Titian Corporation's stock in exchange for its voting stock. Iris received
1,000 shares of Jupiter valued at $50,000 for her 8,000 shares of Titian that cost Iris $100,000 five years ago.
In addition to the Jupiter stock, she receives a $30,000 bond. How does Iris treat this transaction for tax
purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Iris has a realized loss of $20,000; however, losses are not recognized in reorganizations. Her
basis in her Jupiter stock will be $70,000 ($100,000 - $30,000 bond received).
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
A shareholder bought 2,000 shares of Zee Corporation for $90,000 several years ago. When the stock is
valued at $200,000, Zee redeems these shares in exchange for 6,000 shares of Yea Corporation stock. This
transaction meets the requirements of § 368. Which of the following statements is true with regard to this
transaction? Answer
Selected Answer:
The shareholder has a postponed gain of $110,000.
Response
Feedback: No gain or loss is recognized on the transaction; therefore, the realized gain of $110,000 is
postponed.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Xian Corporation and Win Corporation would like to combine into one entity. Xian exchanges 40% of its
common and preferred stock plus $200,000 cash for 60% of Win's assets and liabilities. Win distributes the
Xian stock, cash, unwanted assets, and liabilities to its shareholders in exchange for their outstanding stock.
Win then liquidates. Answer
Selected Answer:
This does not qualify as a reorganization under § 368.
Response
Feedback: This restructuring does not qualify as a "Type A" statutory merger because all of the Win
liabilities were not transferred to Xian. A stock for stock exchange is necessary for a "Type B"
reorganization, which was not the case here. The transaction does not qualify as a "Type C"
reorganization because at least 80% of Win's assets are not obtained with voting stock. The
restructuring is not an acquisitive "Type D" reorganization because Xian is transferring stock to
Win, not assets. Therefore, this transaction is not one of the reorganizations provided in § 368.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Norma formed Hyacinth Enterprises, a proprietorship, in 2010. In its first year, Hyacinth had operating
income of $200,000 and operating expenses of $100,000. In addition, Hyacinth had a long-term capital loss
of $9,000. Norma, the proprietor of Hyacinth Enterprises, withdrew $50,000 from Hyacinth during the year.
Assuming Norma has no other capital gains or losses, how does this information affect her taxable income
for 2010? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Increases Norma's taxable income by $97,000 ($100,000 ordinary business income - $3,000
long-term capital loss)
Response
Feedback: A proprietorship is not a separate taxable entity. As a proprietor, Norma reports profit or loss
from Hyacinth on her individual return. Norma's taxable income for 2010 will be increased by
$97,000 ($200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000 net ordinary business income - $3,000 capital loss
deduction). The $50,000 she withdrew from Hyacinth has no effect on her taxable income.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Domingo and Juan, brothers, each own 300 shares in White Corporation (E & P of $700,000). Heron
Partnership owns the remaining 400 shares of stock in White Corporation, and Juan has a 25% interest in
Heron Partnership. White Corporation redeems 200 shares of Juan's stock for $120,000. Juan paid $150 a
share for the stock five years ago. With respect to the redemption: Answer
Selected Answer:
Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000.
Response
Feedback: The redemption meets both tests of § 302(b)(2) and qualifies for sale or exchange treatment.
Before and after the redemption, Juan is deemed to own a proportionate number of the White
shares owned by Heron Partnership, but none of the shares owned by Domingo. (The family
attribution rules do not include siblings.) Thus, before the redemption, Juan has a 40% interest
in White: 300 shares directly plus 100 shares indirectly from Heron (25% x 400). After the
redemption, Juan owns 25% of the stock in White Corporation: [200 shares (100 directly plus
100 indirectly from Heron) x 800 postredemption shares outstanding]. The 25% ownership
interest is less than 50% of the total voting power and less than 80% of Juan's original
ownership [25% is less than 32% (80% x 40%)]. Thus, the distribution is a disproportionate
redemption and Juan has a long-term capital gain of $90,000 [$120,000 (amount realized) -
$30,000 (stock basis)].
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Beige Corporation (a calendar year taxpayer) has taxable income of $150,000, and its financial records
reflect the following for the year. Federal income taxes paid $75,000
Net operating loss carryforward deducted currently $35,000
Gain recognized this year on an installment sale from a prior year $22,000
Depreciation deducted on tax return (ADS depreciation would have been $5,000) $20,000
Interest income on Iowa state bonds $4,000
Beige Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$107,000
Response
Feedback: To determine E & P, the Federal income tax is subtracted from taxable income and the net
operating loss carryforward is added. The gain recognized currently from the prior year's
installment sale is subtracted. The excess of depreciation deducted on the tax return over ADS
depreciation and the interest from Iowa state bonds are added.
Question 11
1 out of 1 points
Which provision could best be justified as encouraging small business? Answer
Selected Answer:
S corporation election
Response Feedback: The S corporation was designed to encourage small business growth.
Question 12
1 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following is a characteristic of the DPAD? Answer
Selected
Answer:
Can sometimes apply when some of the components of a product are manufactured in foreign
countries
Response
Feedback: As long as the domestic portion of the production is substantial, DPGR results (choice d. ).
DPAD applies to most entities including S corporations (choice a. ). Not only can DPGR result
from the performance of engineering and architectural services, but certain embedded services
can qualify (choice c.). There are no restrictions or requirements on where the manufactured
goods have to be sent or sold (choice b. ).
Question 13
1 out of 1 points
All of the following statements are true about gains recognized in a corporate reorganization except: Answer
Selected
Answer:
Corporate shareholders would prefer taxable amounts in a reorganization be classified as a
capital gain.
Response Feedback: Corporations prefer dividend treatment because of the dividends received deduction.
Question 14
1 out of 1 points
Yellow Corporation and Green Corporation enter into a "Type A" reorganization. Raul currently holds a 15-
year $100,000 Green bond paying 6% interest. In exchange for his Green bond, Raul receives a 5-year
$125,000 Yellow bond paying 5% interest. Raul is happy with the Yellow bond because, even though it pays
a lower interest rate, the yield provides slightly more interest than the Green bond, and both bonds mature on
the same date. How does Raul treat this transaction on his tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Raul recognizes gain of $25,000 on the exchange ($125,000 - $100,000).
Response
Feedback: Raul recognizes gain to the extent that the principal amounts of the bonds received are in
excess of the bonds given up, or $25,000.
Question 15
1 out of 1 points
Carlos purchased 20% of Target Corporation's stock five years ago for $50,000. In a transaction qualifying
as a "Type A" reorganization, Carlos received $40,000 cash and 6% of Acquiring Corporation's stock
(valued at $60,000) in exchange for his Target stock. Target had $300,000 accumulated earnings and profits
prior to the reorganization. How does Carlos treat the exchange for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
As a stock redemption and recognizes a $40,000 long-term capital gain
Response
Feedback: If Carlos had received only stock, he would have received 10% of Acquiring. Since Carlos
owns 6% of Acquiring, which is less than 80% of the stock he would have owned (6% ÷ 10% is
less than 80%), and he owns less than 50% of Acquiring, he meets the § 302(b)(2)
qualifications for redemption treatment.
Question 16
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is false regarding a "Type A" reorganization? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The acquiring corporation assumes only those liabilities of the target corporation that are
associated with assets.
Response
Feedback: The acquiring corporation must assume all the liabilities of the target corporation as a
matter of law.
Question 17
1 out of 1 points
Red Corporation, a calendar year taxpayer, has taxable income of $600,000. Among its transactions for the
year are the following: Collection of proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of cash surrender value)$10,000
Realized gain (not recognized) on an involuntary conversion $5,000
Nondeductible fines and penalties $35,000
Disregarding any provision for Federal income taxes, Red Corporation's current E & P is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$575,000
Response
Feedback: To taxable income, the proceeds from insurance policy on life of corporate officer (in excess of
cash surrender value) is added and the nondeductible fines and penalties are subtracted. The
realized gain (not recognized) on the involuntary conversion has no effect on E & P.
Question 18
1 out of 1 points
Silver Corporation redeems all of Alluvia's 3,000 shares and distributes to her 1,000 shares of Gold
Corporation stock plus $20,000 cash. Alluvia's basis in her 30% interest in Silver is $80,000 and the stock's
market value is $120,000. At the time Silver is acquired by Gold, the accumulated earnings and profits of
Silver are $100,000 and Gold's are $50,000. How does Alluvia treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Alluvia reports a $20,000 recognized dividend.
Response
Feedback: Alluvia has a realized gain of $40,000 ($120,000 - $80,000) and a recognized dividend of
$20,000. Her proportionate share of Silver Corporation's accumulated earnings and profits is in
excess of $20,000 ($100,000 x 30% = $30,000).
Question 19
1 out of 1 points
Cardinal Corporation redeems all of its voting common stock. Cardinal then exchanges this redeemed stock
with Wren corporation for 40% of Wren's voting common and nonvoting preferred stock. The Wren stock
was distributed to the Cardinal shareholders. After the transaction, both Cardinal and Wren corporations still
exist. The former Cardinal shareholders are now shareholders of Wren. This transaction qualifies as a(n): Answer
Selected Answer:
Taxable event
Response
Feedback: This does not qualify as a "Type B" reorganization because Wren used preferred stock as well
as voting stock in the exchange. The acquiring corporation can use only voting stock. For the
other types of reorganizations, assets of one of the corporations would have to be transferred to
the other.
Question 20
1 out of 1 points
Target Corporation is merging into Acquiring Corporation under state law requirements. Target has 3,000
shares outstanding, with a value of $100 per share. Joey, one of Target's shareholders, exchanges his 500
Target shares, for which he paid $80 per share, for 1,000 shares of Crow stock, valued at $30 per share, and
$5,000 cash. Acquiring owns 40% of Crow stock. How does Joey treat this transaction for tax purposes? Answer
Selected Answer:
Joey has a recognized loss of $5,000.
Response
Feedback: This is a taxable transaction because Joey received no stock in Acquiring in exchange for his
stock in Target. Acquiring's ownership of Crow is an investment. Thus, Crow is not a party to
the reorganization. 500 x $80 = $40,000 basis - $30,000 Crow stock - $5,000 cash = $5,000 loss
for Joey.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
ParentCo owned 100% of SubCo for the entire year. ParentCo uses the accrual method of tax accounting,
whereas SubCo uses the cash method. During the year, SubCo sold raw materials to ParentCo for $35,000
under a contract that requires no payment to SubCo until the following year.
Exclusive of this transaction, ParentCo had income for the year of $80,000, and SubCo had income of
$50,000. The group's consolidated taxable income for the year was: Answer
Selected Answer:
$95,000
Response
Feedback: Since SubCo uses the cash method of accounting, it will not recognize the $35,000 of income
for the materials sold to ParentCo until the next tax period (when payment is received).
ParentCo's related deduction must also be deferred until the later year. The group's consolidated
taxable income is $130,000, the sum of ParentCo's and SubCo's separate incomes.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of the stock of SubCo on January 2, 2009, and the two companies filed consolidated
returns for 2009 and thereafter. Both entities were incorporated in 2008. Taxable income computations for
the members include the following. Neither group member incurred any capital gain or loss transactions
during these years, nor did they make any charitable contributions. No § 382 limit applies. 2008 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($75,000) and Consolidated Taxable Income N/A.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($40,000) and Consolidated Taxable Income $60,000.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $20,000 and Consolidated Taxable Income ?
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $125,000 and Consolidated Taxable Income ?
To what extent can SubCo's 2008 losses be used by the group in 2011? Answer
Selected Answer:
$125,000
Response
Feedback: The $40,000 2009 loss is absorbed in the current year against ParentCo's income. Because the
2008 loss arose in a separate return year, its use as a deduction against group income is limited
to the lesser of SubCo's current-year or cumulative positive contribution to consolidated taxable
income. For 2009 and 2010, this amount is less than zero.
After 2011, SubCo's cumulative contribution to consolidated taxable income was $105,000 =
$40,000 loss for 2009 + 2010's $20,000 income + 2011's income of $125,000. Thus, all of the
2008 separate return year $75,000 loss is applied against 2011 income.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of the stock of SubCo on January 1, 2009, for $500,000. SubCo produced a loss for
2009 of $150,000 and distributed cash of $25,000 to ParentCo. In 2010, SubCo generated a loss of $750,000;
in 2011, it recognized net income of $45,000. What is ParentCo's capital gain or loss if it sells all of its
SubCo stock to a nongroup member on January 1, 2012, for $50,000? Answer
Selected Answer:
$430,000
Response
Feedback: When accumulated deficits in the subsidiary's post-acquisition earnings and profits exceed the
acquisition price, an excess loss account is created to permit the group to recognize current
subsidiary losses while avoiding a negative stock basis. If the subsidiary stock is sold to a
nongroup member, the balance of the excess loss account is recognized as capital gain income
by the seller.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Alb, Bud, and Coe constitute an affiliated group of corporations. Which of the following tax effects becomes
more restrictive if an election is made to file on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Choice of members' tax year ends
Response
Feedback: The others are treated alike even if no election to consolidate is made, because the
controlled group rules apply.
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
The consolidated net operating loss of Parent includes all of the following except: Answer
Selected Answer:
Parent's portfolio income
Response Feedback: The charitable deduction has its own carryover period.
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
The Philstrom consolidated group reported the following taxable income amounts. Parent owns all of the
stock of both Junior and Minor. Determine the net operating loss (NOL) that is apportioned to Minor.
Parent($600,000) and Junior ($400,000) and Minor $100,000 Answer
Selected Answer:
$0. All NOLs of a consolidated group are apportioned to the parent.
Response Feedback: Only members with separate NOLs are apportioned any of the consolidated NOL.
Question 7
0 out of 1 points
How do the members of a consolidated group split among themselves the benefits of the lower tax brackets
on the first $75,000 of taxable income? Answer
Selected
Answer:
According to an internal tax-sharing agreement, which may be modified by the IRS upon
audit
Response Feedback: This agreement is respected by the government if all group members agree to it in writing.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
How are the members of a Federal consolidated group affected by computations related to E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
E & P is computed solely on a consolidated basis.
Response Feedback: There is no such concept as consolidated E & P.
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following potentially is a disadvantage of electing to file a Federal corporate income tax
consolidated return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Deferral of gains realized in transactions between group members
Response
Feedback: All of the items may be computed on a group basis and be used to manage the tax liabilities
of the group as a whole.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of SubCo's stock on January 1, 2010, and the companies have filed consolidated
returns since then. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. Neither group
member incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any charitable
contributions.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $70,000 and Consolidated Taxable
Income N/A.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($70,000) and Consolidated
Taxable Income $30,000.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $9,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($20,000) and Consolidated Taxable
Income ?
2012 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $230,000 and Consolidated
Taxable Income ?
The 2011 net operating loss: Answer
Selected Answer:
either a or b, but not both
Response
Feedback: The $11,000 (not $20,000) 2011 net operating loss may be carried back against SubCo's 2009
taxable income, as SubCo is solely responsible for generating the loss. Alternatively, ParentCo
could elect to forgo the carryback of the 2011 consolidated loss, thus preserving the loss
deduction for the group's subsequent years.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
The consolidated net operating loss of Parent includes all of the following except: Answer
Selected Answer:
Parent's charitable contributions
Response Feedback: The charitable deduction has its own carryover period.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
ParentCo, SubOne and SubTwo have filed consolidated returns since 2009. All of the entities were
incorporated in 2008. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. None of the
group members incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any
charitable contributions. 2008 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income $50,000 and SubTwo's Taxable Income $150,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income N/A.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income ($60,000) and SubTwo's Taxable Income $70,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income $210,000.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $60,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income ($80,000) and SubTwo's Taxable Income ($40,000) and
Consolidated Taxable Income ?.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income $130,000 and SubTwo's Taxable Income $10,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income ?.
How should the 2010 consolidated net operating loss be apportioned among the group members? Answer
Selected Answer:
$20,000 ParentCo, $20,000 SubOne, $20,000 SubTwo
Response
Feedback: SubOne's Apportioned NOL=$40,000=$60,000 x [$80,000 ÷ ($80,000 + $40,000)]SubTwo's
Apportioned NOL=$20,000=$60,000 x [$40,000 ÷ ($80,000 + $40,000)]
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
The Rub, Sal, and Ton Corporations file Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis. The group's tax
return currently is under audit. Under a valid tax-sharing agreement, each corporation is liable for one-third
of the group's consolidated tax liability. The affiliates have agreed with the auditor that the group's unpaid
liability for the year is $90,000. Because of an incorrect tax return position, another $3,000 in interest and an
$1,800 penalty is attributable solely to Ton. At present, only Rub is solvent and has the cash with which to
make such a tax payment. What is the maximum amount for which the government could be successful in
forcing Rub to satisfy the outstanding liabilities of the consolidated group? Answer
Selected Answer:
$91,800
Response
Feedback: Each member has joint and several liability for the entire amount of the group's income
taxes, interest, and penalties outstanding.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Alb, Bud, and Coe constitute an affiliated group of corporations. Which of the following tax effects becomes
more restrictive if an election is made to file on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Choice of members' tax year ends
Response
Feedback: The others are treated alike even if no election to consolidate is made, because the
controlled group rules apply.
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following potentially is a disadvantage of electing to file a Federal consolidated corporate
income tax return? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The capital loss of one member is not offset against the capital gain of another member of the
group.
Response Feedback: Deferred transactions can be deferred which is not usually a good thing.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is eligible to file Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
U.S. corporation engaged in the oil and gas industry
Response
Feedback: The U.S. corporation is the only entity that would be eligible to file this on a consolidated
basis.
Question 7
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following potentially is a disadvantage of electing to file a Federal corporate income tax
consolidated return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Dividends received deduction for payments from a subsidiary to the group's parent
Response
Feedback: All of the items may be computed on a group basis and be used to manage the tax liabilities
of the group as a whole.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
How do the members of a consolidated group split among themselves the benefits of the lower tax brackets
on the first $75,000 of taxable income? Answer
Selected
Answer:
According to a tax-sharing agreement that must be approved by the IRS by the end of the first
quarter of the tax year
Response Feedback: This agreement is respected by the government if all group members agree to it in writing.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
How are the members of a Federal consolidated group affected by computations related to E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
Each member keeps its own E & P account.
Response Feedback: There is no such concept as consolidated E & P.
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following items is not computed on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Net operating losses
Response
Feedback: Each group member may continue to apply the depreciation method best suited for its
needs.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of SubCo's stock on January 1, 2010, and the companies have filed consolidated
returns since then. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. Neither group
member incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any charitable
contributions.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $70,000 and Consolidated Taxable
Income N/A.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($70,000) and Consolidated
Taxable Income $30,000.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $9,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($20,000) and Consolidated Taxable
Income ?
2012 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $230,000 and Consolidated
Taxable Income ?
The 2011 net operating loss: Answer
Selected Answer:
may be carried back to offset SubCo's 2009 taxable income
Response
Feedback: The $11,000 (not $20,000) 2011 net operating loss may be carried back against SubCo's 2009
taxable income, as SubCo is solely responsible for generating the loss. Alternatively, ParentCo
could elect to forgo the carryback of the 2011 consolidated loss, thus preserving the loss
deduction for the group's subsequent years.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
How are the members of a Federal consolidated group affected by computations related to E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
Each member keeps its own E & P account.
Response Feedback: There is no such concept as consolidated E & P.
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following potentially is a disadvantage of electing to file a Federal corporate income tax
consolidated return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Deferral of gains realized in transactions between group members
Response
Feedback: All of the items may be computed on a group basis and be used to manage the tax liabilities
of the group as a whole.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
How do the members of a consolidated group split among themselves the benefits of the lower tax brackets
on the first $75,000 of taxable income? Answer
Selected Answer:
According to an internal tax-sharing agreement
Response Feedback: This agreement is respected by the government if all group members agree to it in writing.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Alb, Bud, and Coe constitute an affiliated group of corporations. Which of the following tax effects becomes
more restrictive if an election is made to file on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Choice of members' tax year ends
Response
Feedback: The others are treated alike even if no election to consolidate is made, because the
controlled group rules apply.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo owned 100% of SubCo for the entire year. ParentCo uses the accrual method of tax accounting,
whereas SubCo uses the cash method. During the year, SubCo sold raw materials to ParentCo for $35,000
under a contract that requires no payment to SubCo until the following year.
Exclusive of this transaction, ParentCo had income for the year of $80,000, and SubCo had income of
$50,000. The group's consolidated taxable income for the year was: Answer
Selected Answer:
$130,000
Response
Feedback: Since SubCo uses the cash method of accounting, it will not recognize the $35,000 of income
for the materials sold to ParentCo until the next tax period (when payment is received).
ParentCo's related deduction must also be deferred until the later year. The group's consolidated
taxable income is $130,000, the sum of ParentCo's and SubCo's separate incomes.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
The Philstrom consolidated group reported the following taxable income amounts. Parent owns all of the
stock of both Junior and Minor. Determine the net operating loss (NOL) that is apportioned to Minor.
Parent($600,000) and Junior ($400,000) and Minor $100,000 Answer
Selected Answer:
$0. Minor did not report an NOL of its own.
Response Feedback: Only members with separate NOLs are apportioned any of the consolidated NOL.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of the stock of SubCo on January 2, 2009, and the two companies filed consolidated
returns for 2009 and thereafter. Both entities were incorporated in 2008. Taxable income computations for
the members include the following. Neither group member incurred any capital gain or loss transactions
during these years, nor did they make any charitable contributions. No § 382 limit applies. 2008 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($75,000) and Consolidated Taxable Income N/A.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($40,000) and Consolidated Taxable Income $60,000.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $20,000 and Consolidated Taxable Income ?
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $125,000 and Consolidated Taxable Income ?
To what extent can SubCo's 2008 losses be used by the group in 2011? Answer
Selected Answer:
$75,000
Response
Feedback: The $40,000 2009 loss is absorbed in the current year against ParentCo's income. Because the
2008 loss arose in a separate return year, its use as a deduction against group income is limited
to the lesser of SubCo's current-year or cumulative positive contribution to consolidated taxable
income. For 2009 and 2010, this amount is less than zero.
After 2011, SubCo's cumulative contribution to consolidated taxable income was $105,000 =
$40,000 loss for 2009 + 2010's $20,000 income + 2011's income of $125,000. Thus, all of the
2008 separate return year $75,000 loss is applied against 2011 income.
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
ParentCo, SubOne and SubTwo have filed consolidated returns since 2009. All of the entities were
incorporated in 2008. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. None of the
group members incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any
charitable contributions. 2008 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income $50,000 and SubTwo's Taxable Income $150,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income N/A.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income ($60,000) and SubTwo's Taxable Income $70,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income $210,000.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $60,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income ($80,000) and SubTwo's Taxable Income ($40,000) and
Consolidated Taxable Income ?.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income $130,000 and SubTwo's Taxable Income $10,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income ?.
How should the 2010 consolidated net operating loss be apportioned among the group members? Answer
Selected Answer:
$20,000 ParentCo, $20,000 SubOne, $20,000 SubTwo
Response
Feedback: SubOne's Apportioned NOL=$40,000=$60,000 x [$80,000 ÷ ($80,000 + $40,000)]SubTwo's
Apportioned NOL=$20,000=$60,000 x [$40,000 ÷ ($80,000 + $40,000)]
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is eligible to file Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
U.S. corporation engaged in the oil and gas industry
Response
Feedback: The U.S. corporation is the only entity that would be eligible to file this on a consolidated
basis.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
How do the members of a consolidated group split among themselves the benefits of the lower tax brackets
on the first $75,000 of taxable income? Answer
Selected Answer:
According to an internal tax-sharing agreement
Response Feedback: This agreement is respected by the government if all group members agree to it in writing.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of SubCo's stock on January 1, 2010, and the companies have filed consolidated
returns since then. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. Neither group
member incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any charitable
contributions.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $70,000 and Consolidated Taxable
Income N/A.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($70,000) and Consolidated
Taxable Income $30,000.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $9,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($20,000) and Consolidated Taxable
Income ?
2012 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $230,000 and Consolidated
Taxable Income ?
The 2011 net operating loss: Answer
Selected Answer:
may be carried forward only and applied against group income if so elected by ParentCo
Response
Feedback: The $11,000 (not $20,000) 2011 net operating loss may be carried back against SubCo's 2009
taxable income, as SubCo is solely responsible for generating the loss. Alternatively, ParentCo
could elect to forgo the carryback of the 2011 consolidated loss, thus preserving the loss
deduction for the group's subsequent years.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
How are the members of a Federal consolidated group affected by computations related to E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
Each member keeps its own E & P account.
Response Feedback: There is no such concept as consolidated E & P.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is eligible to file Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
U.S. corporation engaged in the oil and gas industry
Response
Feedback: The U.S. corporation is the only entity that would be eligible to file this on a consolidated
basis.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo owned 100% of SubCo for the entire year. ParentCo uses the accrual method of tax accounting,
whereas SubCo uses the cash method. During the year, SubCo sold raw materials to ParentCo for $35,000
under a contract that requires no payment to SubCo until the following year.
Exclusive of this transaction, ParentCo had income for the year of $80,000, and SubCo had income of
$50,000. The group's consolidated taxable income for the year was: Answer
Selected Answer:
$130,000
Response
Feedback: Since SubCo uses the cash method of accounting, it will not recognize the $35,000 of income
for the materials sold to ParentCo until the next tax period (when payment is received).
ParentCo's related deduction must also be deferred until the later year. The group's consolidated
taxable income is $130,000, the sum of ParentCo's and SubCo's separate incomes.
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following potentially is a disadvantage of electing to file a Federal corporate income tax
consolidated return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Dividends received deduction for payments from a subsidiary to the group's parent
Response
Feedback: All of the items may be computed on a group basis and be used to manage the tax liabilities
of the group as a whole.
Question 7
0 out of 1 points
The Rub, Sal, and Ton Corporations file Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis. The group's tax
return currently is under audit. Under a valid tax-sharing agreement, each corporation is liable for one-third
of the group's consolidated tax liability. The affiliates have agreed with the auditor that the group's unpaid
liability for the year is $90,000. Because of an incorrect tax return position, another $3,000 in interest and an
$1,800 penalty is attributable solely to Ton. At present, only Rub is solvent and has the cash with which to
make such a tax payment. What is the maximum amount for which the government could be successful in
forcing Rub to satisfy the outstanding liabilities of the consolidated group? Answer
Selected Answer:
$4,800
Response
Feedback: Each member has joint and several liability for the entire amount of the group's income
taxes, interest, and penalties outstanding.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Alb, Bud, and Coe constitute an affiliated group of corporations. Which of the following tax effects becomes
more restrictive if an election is made to file on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Choice of members' tax year ends
Response
Feedback: The others are treated alike even if no election to consolidate is made, because the
controlled group rules apply.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
The consolidated net operating loss of Parent includes all of the following except: Answer
Selected Answer:
Parent's charitable contributions
Response Feedback: The charitable deduction has its own carryover period.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo, SubOne and SubTwo have filed consolidated returns since 2009. All of the entities were
incorporated in 2008. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. None of the
group members incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any
charitable contributions. 2008 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income $50,000 and SubTwo's Taxable Income $150,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income N/A.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income ($60,000) and SubTwo's Taxable Income $70,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income $210,000.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $60,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income ($80,000) and SubTwo's Taxable Income ($40,000) and
Consolidated Taxable Income ?.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $200,000 and SubOne's Taxable Income $130,000 and SubTwo's Taxable Income $10,000 and
Consolidated Taxable Income ?.
How should the 2010 consolidated net operating loss be apportioned among the group members? Answer
Selected Answer:
$0 ParentCo, $40,000 SubOne, $20,000 SubTwo
Response SubOne's Apportioned NOL=$40,000=$60,000 x [$80,000 ÷ ($80,000 + $40,000)]SubTwo's
Feedback: Apportioned NOL=$20,000=$60,000 x [$40,000 ÷ ($80,000 + $40,000)]
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
How do the members of a consolidated group split among themselves the benefits of the lower tax brackets
on the first $75,000 of taxable income? Answer
Selected Answer:
According to an internal tax-sharing agreement
Response Feedback: This agreement is respected by the government if all group members agree to it in writing.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of the stock of SubCo on January 1, 2009, for $500,000. SubCo produced a loss for
2009 of $150,000 and distributed cash of $25,000 to ParentCo. In 2010, SubCo generated a loss of $750,000;
in 2011, it recognized net income of $45,000. What is ParentCo's capital gain or loss if it sells all of its
SubCo stock to a nongroup member on January 1, 2012, for $50,000? Answer
Selected Answer:
$430,000
Response
Feedback: When accumulated deficits in the subsidiary's post-acquisition earnings and profits exceed the
acquisition price, an excess loss account is created to permit the group to recognize current
subsidiary losses while avoiding a negative stock basis. If the subsidiary stock is sold to a
nongroup member, the balance of the excess loss account is recognized as capital gain income
by the seller.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo owned 100% of SubCo for the entire year. ParentCo uses the accrual method of tax accounting,
whereas SubCo uses the cash method. During the year, SubCo sold raw materials to ParentCo for $35,000
under a contract that requires no payment to SubCo until the following year.
Exclusive of this transaction, ParentCo had income for the year of $80,000, and SubCo had income of
$50,000. The group's consolidated taxable income for the year was: Answer
Selected Answer:
$130,000
Response
Feedback: Since SubCo uses the cash method of accounting, it will not recognize the $35,000 of income
for the materials sold to ParentCo until the next tax period (when payment is received).
ParentCo's related deduction must also be deferred until the later year. The group's consolidated
taxable income is $130,000, the sum of ParentCo's and SubCo's separate incomes.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following items is not computed on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Cost recovery deduction
Response
Feedback: Each group member may continue to apply the depreciation method best suited for its
needs.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following potentially is a disadvantage of electing to file a Federal consolidated corporate
income tax return? Answer
Selected Answer:
Recognition of losses from certain intercompany transactions is deferred.
Response Feedback: Deferred transactions can be deferred which is not usually a good thing.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
ParentCo purchased all of SubCo's stock on January 1, 2010, and the companies have filed consolidated
returns since then. Taxable income computations for the members include the following. Neither group
member incurred any capital gain or loss transactions during these years, nor did they make any charitable
contributions.
2009 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $70,000 and Consolidated Taxable
Income N/A.
2010 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($70,000) and Consolidated
Taxable Income $30,000.
2011 ParentCo's Taxable Income $9,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income ($20,000) and Consolidated Taxable
Income ?
2012 ParentCo's Taxable Income $100,000 and SubCo's Taxable Income $230,000 and Consolidated
Taxable Income ?
The 2011 net operating loss: Answer
Selected Answer:
either a or b, but not both
Response
Feedback: The $11,000 (not $20,000) 2011 net operating loss may be carried back against SubCo's 2009
taxable income, as SubCo is solely responsible for generating the loss. Alternatively, ParentCo
could elect to forgo the carryback of the 2011 consolidated loss, thus preserving the loss
deduction for the group's subsequent years.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
The Philstrom consolidated group reported the following taxable income amounts. Parent owns all of the
stock of both Junior and Minor. Determine the net operating loss (NOL) that is apportioned to Minor.
Parent($600,000) and Junior ($400,000) and Minor $100,000 Answer
Selected Answer:
$0. Minor did not report an NOL of its own.
Response Feedback: Only members with separate NOLs are apportioned any of the consolidated NOL.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Alb, Bud, and Coe constitute an affiliated group of corporations. Which of the following tax effects becomes
more restrictive if an election is made to file on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
Choice of members' tax year ends
Response
Feedback: The others are treated alike even if no election to consolidate is made, because the
controlled group rules apply.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is eligible to file Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis? Answer
Selected Answer:
U.S. corporation engaged in the oil and gas industry
Response
Feedback: The U.S. corporation is the only entity that would be eligible to file this on a consolidated
basis.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
How are the members of a Federal consolidated group affected by computations related to E & P? Answer
Selected Answer:
Each member keeps its own E & P account.
Response Feedback: There is no such concept as consolidated E & P.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Martin has a basis in a partnership interest of $100,000. At the end of the current year, the partnership
distributed to Martin, in a proportionate nonliquidating distribution, cash of $10,000, inventory (basis to the
partnership of $6,000 and fair market value of $12,000), and land (basis to the partnership of $20,000 and
fair market value of $15,000). In addition, Martin's share of partnership debt decreased by $10,000 during
the year. What basis does Martin take in the inventory and land and in the partnership interest following the
distribution? Answer
Selected Answer:
$12,000 basis in inventory; $15,000 basis in land, $53,000 basis in partnership
Response
Feedback: Basis of Martin's interest $100,000 Less: Cash and deemed cash distribution (20,000), Basis
before property distributions $80,000 Less: Inventory distribution (6,000) *Less: Land
distribution (20,000)*Basis after property distributions $54,000 Martin's basis in the inventory
and land equals the partnership's basis in these properties. Whether the property is appreciated
or depreciated does not matter in this case since his basis in these properties is not limited.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
A partnership will take a carryover basis in an asset it acquires when: Answer
Selected Answer:
The partnership acquires the asset through a § 1031 like-kind exchange.
Response
Feedback: When a partner contributes an asset to a partnership in exchange for a partnership interest under
§ 721(a), the partnership takes a carryover basis for the asset under § 723.
Under § 1031, a partnership takes a substituted basis for the asset received in the exchange so
choice "a" is incorrect. The purchase of an asset from either a partner or an outside party will
result in the asset taking a cost basis to the partnership, therefore choice "b" is also incorrect.
Choice "d" is incorrect because when a partnership leases an asset from a partner under a short-
term lease the asset is not a partnership asset and is not recorded on the partnership books.
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
Partner Tom transferred property (basis of $20,000; fair market value of $50,000) to the TUV Partnership in
exchange for a partnership interest. At a later date when Tom's outside basis for his partnership interest was
$70,000, Tom received a $50,000 cash distribution from the partnership. Which one of the following
statements is not true? Answer
Selected
Answer:
If the IRS treated the transaction as a disguised sale, the partnership's basis in the property
would be $50,000. e. None of these statements are correct.
Response
Feedback: A contribution and distribution are presumed to be a disguised sale if they occur within two
years (choice a. is true). Conversely, if there is entrepreneurial risk related to the future
distribution, the transaction is not generally treated as a disguised sale (choice c. is true). If a
transaction is treated as a disguised sale it is treated as a sale for all calculations: The
partnership takes a cost ($50,000) basis in the property (choice d. is true).
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Wendy receives a proportionate nonliquidating distribution from the WXY Partnership. The distribution
consists of $75,000 cash and property with an adjusted basis to the partnership of $20,000 and a fair market
value of $25,000. Immediately before the distribution, Wendy's adjusted basis for her partnership interest is
$90,000. Wendy's basis in the noncash property received is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$25,000
Response
Feedback: Wendy's basis in the partnership interest is first reduced to $15,000 by the $75,000 cash
distribution. Because this is a nonliquidating distribution, the basis in the noncash property is
the lesser of $15,000 (remaining basis in the partnership interest) or the partnership's $20,000
basis in the property. The basis in the property, therefore, is $15,000, and Wendy's basis in the
partnership interest is reduced to $0.
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
On a partnership's Form 1065, which of the following statements is always true? Answer
Selected Answer:
The partnership balance sheet is required to be presented on a tax basis.
Response
Feedback: The partnership reconciles the "taxable income equivalent"-Net Income (Loss) from the
Analysis of Income (Loss) to book income (choice a. is not true). The partnership's balance
sheet (on Schedule L) will typically be reported on a book basis (choice b is not true). The
partnership reports income from operations on Form 1065, page 1, and it reports other types of
income and expenses (separately stated items) on Form 1065, Schedule K (choice c. is not true).
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following partnership owners is personally liable for the entity's debts to general creditors? Answer
Selected Answer:
A member of a limited liability company
Response
Feedback: General partners are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's debts. Limited partners are
not required to make contributions to the entity beyond their contractual obligation for deferred
capital contributions. Members of an LLC are generally not liable for entity debts. For states in
which limited liability limited partnerships may be formed, neither the general nor the limited
partners are liable for entity debts.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
William's basis in the WAM Partnership interest was $100,000 just before he received a proportionate
liquidating distribution consisting of investment land (basis of $30,000, fair market value $40,000), and
inventory (basis of $30,000, fair market value $70,000). After the distribution, William's recognized gain or
loss and his basis in the land and inventory are: Answer
Selected Answer:
$0 gain or loss; $70,000 (land); $30,000 (inventory)
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For William, the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $30,000. This reduces William's basis to $70,000.
The land is distributed next. Because this is a liquidating distribution, the land absorbs
William's remaining basis in WAM of $70,000. William cannot claim a loss because he has
received property other than cash, inventory, and unrealized receivables.
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Catherine's basis was $50,000 in the CAR Partnership interest just before she received a proportionate
nonliquidating distribution consisting of land held for investment (basis of $40,000, fair market value of
$60,000) and inventory (basis of $40,000, fair market value of $40,000). After the distribution, Catherine's
bases in the land and inventory are respectively: Answer
Selected Answer:
$40,000 and $10,000
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For Catherine the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $40,000. This reduces Catherine's basis to
$10,000. The land is distributed next and takes the $10,000 remaining basis.
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
Kevin, Chuck, and Greg contributed assets to form the equal KCG Partnership. Kevin contributed cash of
$50,000 and land with a basis of $80,000 (fair market value of $50,000). Chuck contributed cash of $30,000
and land with a basis of $40,000 (fair market value of $70,000). Greg contributed cash of $60,000 and a
fully depreciated property ($0 basis) valued at $40,000. Which of the following tax treatments is not correct? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of these statements are correct.
Response
Feedback: Chuck's basis in the partnership interest equals the $30,000 cash plus his $40,000 basis in the
property contributed. The other three statements are correct. Kevin's basis equals the cash
contribution plus the $80,000 basis in the land. Greg's basis equals the $60,000 cash
contribution since he had no basis in the property he contributed. The partnership takes a
carryover basis in the three contributed properties.
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an election or calculation made by the partner rather than the partnership? Answer
Selected Answer:
The taxable year of the partnership
Response
Feedback: The partner determines the amount of the § 199 deduction based on information provided by
the partnership and taking into account the taxpayer's other domestic production activities.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Wendy receives a proportionate nonliquidating distribution from the WXY Partnership. The distribution
consists of $75,000 cash and property with an adjusted basis to the partnership of $20,000 and a fair market
value of $25,000. Immediately before the distribution, Wendy's adjusted basis for her partnership interest is
$90,000. Wendy's basis in the noncash property received is: Answer
Selected Answer:
$15,000
Response
Feedback: Wendy's basis in the partnership interest is first reduced to $15,000 by the $75,000 cash
distribution. Because this is a nonliquidating distribution, the basis in the noncash property is
the lesser of $15,000 (remaining basis in the partnership interest) or the partnership's $20,000
basis in the property. The basis in the property, therefore, is $15,000, and Wendy's basis in the
partnership interest is reduced to $0.
Question 2
0 out of 1 points
Catherine's basis was $50,000 in the CAR Partnership interest just before she received a proportionate
nonliquidating distribution consisting of land held for investment (basis of $40,000, fair market value of
$60,000) and inventory (basis of $40,000, fair market value of $40,000). After the distribution, Catherine's
bases in the land and inventory are respectively: Answer
Selected Answer:
None of the above
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For Catherine the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $40,000. This reduces Catherine's basis to
$10,000. The land is distributed next and takes the $10,000 remaining basis.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Kevin, Chuck, and Greg contributed assets to form the equal KCG Partnership. Kevin contributed cash of
$50,000 and land with a basis of $80,000 (fair market value of $50,000). Chuck contributed cash of $30,000
and land with a basis of $40,000 (fair market value of $70,000). Greg contributed cash of $60,000 and a
fully depreciated property ($0 basis) valued at $40,000. Which of the following tax treatments is not correct? Answer
Selected Answer:
Chuck's basis in his partnership interest is $100,000.
Response
Feedback: Chuck's basis in the partnership interest equals the $30,000 cash plus his $40,000 basis in the
property contributed. The other three statements are correct. Kevin's basis equals the cash
contribution plus the $80,000 basis in the land. Greg's basis equals the $60,000 cash
contribution since he had no basis in the property he contributed. The partnership takes a
carryover basis in the three contributed properties.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following partnership owners is personally liable for the entity's debts to general creditors? Answer
Selected Answer:
None of these owners are personally liable for entity debts
Response
Feedback: General partners are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's debts. Limited partners are
not required to make contributions to the entity beyond their contractual obligation for deferred
capital contributions. Members of an LLC are generally not liable for entity debts. For states in
which limited liability limited partnerships may be formed, neither the general nor the limited
partners are liable for entity debts.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Marty receives a proportionate nonliquidating distribution when the basis of her partnership interest is
$50,000. The distribution consists of $60,000 cash and noninventory property (adjusted basis to the
partnership of $20,000; fair market value of $23,000). How much gain or loss does Marty recognize and
what is her basis in the distributed property and in her partnership interest following the distribution? Answer
Selected Answer:
$10,000 capital gain; $0 basis in property; $0 basis in partnership interest
Response
Feedback: Because Marty received a cash distribution in excess of her basis in the partnership interest
before the distribution, she must recognize a capital gain in the amount of that excess, or
$10,000 ($60,000 distribution - $50,000 basis before distribution). Her basis in the property she
received is limited to the amount of the basis in the partnership interest following the cash
distribution, or $0. Her basis in the partnership interest following all distributions remains $0.
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Cardinal, LLC incurred $20,000 of startup expenses, $3,000 of organizational costs, and paid $10,000 in
transfer taxes to change the title (ownership) of a building contributed by one of the LLC's members. Which
of the following statements is correct regarding these three amounts? Answer
Selected Answer:
Cardinal may deduct the full amount of the organizational costs.
Response
Feedback: Cardinal can deduct the first $5,000 of startup expenses and the remaining $15,000 of such
expenses can be amortized over 180 months. Cardinal can deduct the entire $3,000 of
organizational costs because the amount is less than $5,000. Cardinal must capitalize the
$10,000 transfer tax as part of the basis in the building; this basis is treated as a new asset and
depreciated in the same manner in which the underlying building is depreciated.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
William's basis in the WAM Partnership interest was $100,000 just before he received a proportionate
liquidating distribution consisting of investment land (basis of $30,000, fair market value $40,000), and
inventory (basis of $30,000, fair market value $70,000). After the distribution, William's recognized gain or
loss and his basis in the land and inventory are: Answer
Selected Answer:
$0 gain or loss; $70,000 (land); $30,000 (inventory)
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For William, the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $30,000. This reduces William's basis to $70,000.
The land is distributed next. Because this is a liquidating distribution, the land absorbs
William's remaining basis in WAM of $70,000. William cannot claim a loss because he has
received property other than cash, inventory, and unrealized receivables.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an election or calculation made by the partner rather than the partnership? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The amount of the § 199 (domestic production activities) deduction related to partnership
activities
Response The partner determines the amount of the § 199 deduction based on information provided by
Feedback: the partnership and taking into account the taxpayer's other domestic production activities.
Question 9
0 out of 1 points
Barry owns a 25% interest in a continuing partnership. The partnership distributes a $20,000 year-end cash
bonus to all the partners. In a proportionate nonliquidating distribution, the partnership also distributed
property (basis of $2,000; fair market value of $3,000) to Barry. Immediately before the distribution, Barry's
basis in the partnership interest was $30,000. As a result of the distribution, Barry recognizes: Answer
Selected Answer:
Capital loss of $7,000
Response
Feedback: On a nonliquidating distribution, the partner does not recognize a loss. Instead, the basis in the
partnership interest is reduced by the cash received and by the partnership's basis in the property
received. Barry's basis in his partnership interest immediately following the distribution is
$8,000 ($30,000 - $20,000 - $2,000).
Question 10
0 out of 1 points
When property is contributed to a partnership for a capital and profits interest, the holding period of the
contributing partner's interest: Answer
Selected Answer:
Always starts the day the property was contributed
Response
Feedback: Generally, the holding period of a partner's interest includes the holding period of any capital
assets or § 1231 property contributed by the partner. The holding period related to other
property starts on the day the partnership interest is acquired.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
Which of the following partnership owners is personally liable for the entity's debts to general creditors? Answer
Selected Answer:
A partner in a limited liability limited partnership
Response
Feedback: General partners are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's debts. Limited partners are
not required to make contributions to the entity beyond their contractual obligation for deferred
capital contributions. Members of an LLC are generally not liable for entity debts. For states in
which limited liability limited partnerships may be formed, neither the general nor the limited
partners are liable for entity debts.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
When property is contributed to a partnership for a capital and profits interest, the holding period of the
contributing partner's interest: Answer
Selected Answer:
May include the holding period of the contributed property
Response
Feedback: Generally, the holding period of a partner's interest includes the holding period of any capital
assets or § 1231 property contributed by the partner. The holding period related to other
property starts on the day the partnership interest is acquired.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an election or calculation made by the partner rather than the partnership? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The amount of the § 199 (domestic production activities) deduction related to partnership
activities
Response
Feedback: The partner determines the amount of the § 199 deduction based on information provided by
the partnership and taking into account the taxpayer's other domestic production activities.
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
Cardinal, LLC incurred $20,000 of startup expenses, $3,000 of organizational costs, and paid $10,000 in
transfer taxes to change the title (ownership) of a building contributed by one of the LLC's members. Which
of the following statements is correct regarding these three amounts? Answer
Selected Answer:
All of the above statements are true.
Response
Feedback: Cardinal can deduct the first $5,000 of startup expenses and the remaining $15,000 of such
expenses can be amortized over 180 months. Cardinal can deduct the entire $3,000 of
organizational costs because the amount is less than $5,000. Cardinal must capitalize the
$10,000 transfer tax as part of the basis in the building; this basis is treated as a new asset and
depreciated in the same manner in which the underlying building is depreciated.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Barry owns a 25% interest in a continuing partnership. The partnership distributes a $20,000 year-end cash
bonus to all the partners. In a proportionate nonliquidating distribution, the partnership also distributed
property (basis of $2,000; fair market value of $3,000) to Barry. Immediately before the distribution, Barry's
basis in the partnership interest was $30,000. As a result of the distribution, Barry recognizes: Answer
Selected Answer:
No gain or loss
Response
Feedback: On a nonliquidating distribution, the partner does not recognize a loss. Instead, the basis in the
partnership interest is reduced by the cash received and by the partnership's basis in the property
received. Barry's basis in his partnership interest immediately following the distribution is
$8,000 ($30,000 - $20,000 - $2,000).
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
William's basis in the WAM Partnership interest was $100,000 just before he received a proportionate
liquidating distribution consisting of investment land (basis of $30,000, fair market value $40,000), and
inventory (basis of $30,000, fair market value $70,000). After the distribution, William's recognized gain or
loss and his basis in the land and inventory are: Answer
Selected Answer:
$0 gain or loss; $70,000 (land); $30,000 (inventory)
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For William, the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $30,000. This reduces William's basis to $70,000.
The land is distributed next. Because this is a liquidating distribution, the land absorbs
William's remaining basis in WAM of $70,000. William cannot claim a loss because he has
received property other than cash, inventory, and unrealized receivables.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Partner Tom transferred property (basis of $20,000; fair market value of $50,000) to the TUV Partnership in
exchange for a partnership interest. At a later date when Tom's outside basis for his partnership interest was
$70,000, Tom received a $50,000 cash distribution from the partnership. Which one of the following
statements is not true? Answer
Selected
Answer:
If the transaction is treated as a disguised sale, Tom's basis in the partnership interest will be
$20,000.
Response
Feedback: A contribution and distribution are presumed to be a disguised sale if they occur within two
years (choice a. is true). Conversely, if there is entrepreneurial risk related to the future
distribution, the transaction is not generally treated as a disguised sale (choice c. is true). If a
transaction is treated as a disguised sale it is treated as a sale for all calculations: The
partnership takes a cost ($50,000) basis in the property (choice d. is true).
Question 8
0 out of 1 points
Landon received $30,000 cash and a capital asset (basis of $60,000 and fair market value of $80,000) in a
proportionate liquidating distribution. His basis in his partnership interest was $100,000 prior to the
distribution. How much gain or loss does Landon recognize and what is his basis in the asset received? Answer
Selected Answer:
$10,000 gain; $80,000 basis
Response
Feedback: Because Landon has received property other than cash and unrealized receivables or inventory,
no loss may be recognized on the liquidating distribution. The capital asset will take a
substituted basis of $70,000, which was Landon's remaining basis in his partnership interest
after the cash distribution is considered.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
Kevin, Chuck, and Greg contributed assets to form the equal KCG Partnership. Kevin contributed cash of
$50,000 and land with a basis of $80,000 (fair market value of $50,000). Chuck contributed cash of $30,000
and land with a basis of $40,000 (fair market value of $70,000). Greg contributed cash of $60,000 and a
fully depreciated property ($0 basis) valued at $40,000. Which of the following tax treatments is not correct? Answer
Selected Answer:
Chuck's basis in his partnership interest is $100,000.
Response
Feedback: Chuck's basis in the partnership interest equals the $30,000 cash plus his $40,000 basis in the
property contributed. The other three statements are correct. Kevin's basis equals the cash
contribution plus the $80,000 basis in the land. Greg's basis equals the $60,000 cash
contribution since he had no basis in the property he contributed. The partnership takes a
carryover basis in the three contributed properties.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Catherine's basis was $50,000 in the CAR Partnership interest just before she received a proportionate
nonliquidating distribution consisting of land held for investment (basis of $40,000, fair market value of
$60,000) and inventory (basis of $40,000, fair market value of $40,000). After the distribution, Catherine's
bases in the land and inventory are respectively: Answer
Selected Answer:
$10,000 and $40,000
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For Catherine the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $40,000. This reduces Catherine's basis to
$10,000. The land is distributed next and takes the $10,000 remaining basis.
Question 1
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following partnership owners is personally liable for the entity's debts to general creditors? Answer
Selected Answer:
A general partner in a general partnership
Response
Feedback: General partners are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's debts. Limited partners are
not required to make contributions to the entity beyond their contractual obligation for deferred
capital contributions. Members of an LLC are generally not liable for entity debts. For states in
which limited liability limited partnerships may be formed, neither the general nor the limited
partners are liable for entity debts.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Kevin, Chuck, and Greg contributed assets to form the equal KCG Partnership. Kevin contributed cash of
$50,000 and land with a basis of $80,000 (fair market value of $50,000). Chuck contributed cash of $30,000
and land with a basis of $40,000 (fair market value of $70,000). Greg contributed cash of $60,000 and a
fully depreciated property ($0 basis) valued at $40,000. Which of the following tax treatments is not correct? Answer
Selected Answer:
Chuck's basis in his partnership interest is $100,000.
Response
Feedback: Chuck's basis in the partnership interest equals the $30,000 cash plus his $40,000 basis in the
property contributed. The other three statements are correct. Kevin's basis equals the cash
contribution plus the $80,000 basis in the land. Greg's basis equals the $60,000 cash
contribution since he had no basis in the property he contributed. The partnership takes a
carryover basis in the three contributed properties.
Question 3
1 out of 1 points
Barry owns a 25% interest in a continuing partnership. The partnership distributes a $20,000 year-end cash
bonus to all the partners. In a proportionate nonliquidating distribution, the partnership also distributed
property (basis of $2,000; fair market value of $3,000) to Barry. Immediately before the distribution, Barry's
basis in the partnership interest was $30,000. As a result of the distribution, Barry recognizes: Answer
Selected Answer:
No gain or loss
Response
Feedback: On a nonliquidating distribution, the partner does not recognize a loss. Instead, the basis in the
partnership interest is reduced by the cash received and by the partnership's basis in the property
received. Barry's basis in his partnership interest immediately following the distribution is
$8,000 ($30,000 - $20,000 - $2,000).
Question 4
1 out of 1 points
William's basis in the WAM Partnership interest was $100,000 just before he received a proportionate
liquidating distribution consisting of investment land (basis of $30,000, fair market value $40,000), and
inventory (basis of $30,000, fair market value $70,000). After the distribution, William's recognized gain or
loss and his basis in the land and inventory are: Answer
Selected Answer:
$0 gain or loss; $70,000 (land); $30,000 (inventory)
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For William, the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $30,000. This reduces William's basis to $70,000.
The land is distributed next. Because this is a liquidating distribution, the land absorbs
William's remaining basis in WAM of $70,000. William cannot claim a loss because he has
received property other than cash, inventory, and unrealized receivables.
Question 5
1 out of 1 points
Marty receives a proportionate nonliquidating distribution when the basis of her partnership interest is
$50,000. The distribution consists of $60,000 cash and noninventory property (adjusted basis to the
partnership of $20,000; fair market value of $23,000). How much gain or loss does Marty recognize and
what is her basis in the distributed property and in her partnership interest following the distribution? Answer
Selected Answer:
$10,000 capital gain; $0 basis in property; $0 basis in partnership interest
Response
Feedback: Because Marty received a cash distribution in excess of her basis in the partnership interest
before the distribution, she must recognize a capital gain in the amount of that excess, or
$10,000 ($60,000 distribution - $50,000 basis before distribution). Her basis in the property she
received is limited to the amount of the basis in the partnership interest following the cash
distribution, or $0. Her basis in the partnership interest following all distributions remains $0.
Question 6
1 out of 1 points
Landon received $30,000 cash and a capital asset (basis of $60,000 and fair market value of $80,000) in a
proportionate liquidating distribution. His basis in his partnership interest was $100,000 prior to the
distribution. How much gain or loss does Landon recognize and what is his basis in the asset received? Answer
Selected Answer:
$0 gain or loss; $70,000 basis
Response
Feedback: Because Landon has received property other than cash and unrealized receivables or inventory,
no loss may be recognized on the liquidating distribution. The capital asset will take a
substituted basis of $70,000, which was Landon's remaining basis in his partnership interest
after the cash distribution is considered.
Question 7
1 out of 1 points
Catherine's basis was $50,000 in the CAR Partnership interest just before she received a proportionate
nonliquidating distribution consisting of land held for investment (basis of $40,000, fair market value of
$60,000) and inventory (basis of $40,000, fair market value of $40,000). After the distribution, Catherine's
bases in the land and inventory are respectively: Answer
Selected Answer:
$10,000 and $40,000
Response
Feedback: Under the ordering rules for distributions, cash is distributed first, followed by unrealized
receivables and inventory; other assets are distributed last. For Catherine the inventory is
distributed first and takes a carryover basis of $40,000. This reduces Catherine's basis to
$10,000. The land is distributed next and takes the $10,000 remaining basis.
Question 8
1 out of 1 points
Which of the following is an election or calculation made by the partner rather than the partnership? Answer
Selected
Answer:
The amount of the § 199 (domestic production activities) deduction related to partnership
activities
Response
Feedback: The partner determines the amount of the § 199 deduction based on information provided by
the partnership and taking into account the taxpayer's other domestic production activities.
Question 9
1 out of 1 points
A partnership will take a carryover basis in an asset it acquires when: Answer
Selected
Answer:
The partnership acquires the asset from a partner as a contribution to partnership capital
under § 721(a).
Response
Feedback: When a partner contributes an asset to a partnership in exchange for a partnership interest under
§ 721(a), the partnership takes a carryover basis for the asset under § 723.
Under § 1031, a partnership takes a substituted basis for the asset received in the exchange so
choice "a" is incorrect. The purchase of an asset from either a partner or an outside party will
result in the asset taking a cost basis to the partnership, therefore choice "b" is also incorrect.
Choice "d" is incorrect because when a partnership leases an asset from a partner under a short-
term lease the asset is not a partnership asset and is not recorded on the partnership books.
Question 10
1 out of 1 points
Martin has a basis in a partnership interest of $100,000. At the end of the current year, the partnership
distributed to Martin, in a proportionate nonliquidating distribution, cash of $10,000, inventory (basis to the
partnership of $6,000 and fair market value of $12,000), and land (basis to the partnership of $20,000 and
fair market value of $15,000). In addition, Martin's share of partnership debt decreased by $10,000 during
the year. What basis does Martin take in the inventory and land and in the partnership interest following the
distribution? Answer
Selected Answer:
$6,000 basis in inventory; $20,000 basis in land, $54,000 basis in partnership
Response
Feedback: Basis of Martin's interest $100,000 Less: Cash and deemed cash distribution (20,000), Basis
before property distributions $80,000 Less: Inventory distribution (6,000) *Less: Land
distribution (20,000)*Basis after property distributions $54,000 Martin's basis in the inventory
and land equals the partnership's basis in these properties. Whether the property is appreciated
or depreciated does not matter in this case since his basis in these properties is not limited.
Question 1
0 out of 1 points
The maximum number of S shareholders is: Answer
Selected Answer:
Indeterminable
Response Feedback: They are limited to 100 shareholders.
Question 2
1 out of 1 points
Which, if any, of the following can be eligible shareholders of an S corporation? Answer
Selected Answer:
A resident alien
Response Feedback: A resident alien can own stock in an S corporation.
Question 3
0 out of 1 points
On January 2, 2009, David loans his S corporation $10,000, and by the end of 2009 David's stock basis is
zero and the basis in his note has been reduced to $8,000. During 2010, the company's operating income is
$10,000. The company also makes distributions to David of $11,000. Which statement is correct? Answer
Selected Answer:
$11,000 LTCG
Response
Feedback: The $11,000 distribution reduced the $10,000 income, so there is no "net increase" to be
applied to the loan basis. Thus, the $11,000 distribution reduces the new $10,000 stock basis to
zero, with a $1,000 LTCG.
Question 4
0 out of 1 points
During 2010, Shirley Nutt, the sole shareholder of a calendar year S corporation, received a distribution of
$16,000. On December 31, 2009, her stock basis was $4,000. The corporation earned $11,000 ordinary
income during the year. It has no accumulated E & P. Which statement is correct? Answer
Selected Answer:
Nutt's stock basis will be $2,000.
Response
Feedback: $11,000 ordinary income; $15,000 return of capital, $1,000 capital gain. Nutt's stock basis is
increased by the $11,000 ordinary income allocable to her, giving a basis of $15,000 before the
distribution. The first $15,000 of the distribution is a return of capital, reducing the stock basis
to zero. The remaining $1,000 constitutes capital gain (the excess over stock basis).
Question 5
0 out of 1 points
How large must total assets on Schedule L be at the end of the year for an S corporation to be required to file
Schedule M-3? Answer
Selected Answer:
Not required to file
Response Feedback: $10 million will require them to file a different schedule.
Question 6
0 out of 1 points
Samantha owned 1,000 shares in Evita, Inc., an S corporation, that uses the calendar year. On October 11,
2010, Samantha sells all of her Evita stock. Her basis at the beginning of 2010 was $60,000. Her share of the
corporate income for 2010 was $22,000, and she receives a distribution of $37,000 between January 1 and
October 11, 2010. Her basis at the time of the sale is: Answer