Top Banner
ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run: Status Report David Golimowski TIPS/JIM 19 March 2009
16

ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run: Status Report

Feb 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Diane

ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run: Status Report. David Golimowski TIPS/JIM 19 March 2009. ACS-R Flight Hardware. During SM4 (EVA-3) four elements of the ACS will be replaced or modified: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:

Status Report

David Golimowski

TIPS/JIM 19 March 2009

Page 2: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

ACS-R Flight Hardware

During SM4 (EVA-3) four elements of the ACS will be replaced or modified:

CCD Electronics Box Replacement (CEB-R) is the heart of the ACS-R hardware: it will control and read out the ACS WFC CCDs.

Page 3: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Schematic Diagram of CEB-R

• CEB-R features Teledyne SIDECAR* ASIC** that permits optimization of WFC performance via adjustment of CCD clocks, biases, and pixel transmission timing

• Built in oscilloscope mode (O-mode) allows sensing of analog signal from each output amplifier

* System for Image Digitization, Enhancement, Control, and Retrieval

** Application Specific Integrated Circuit

Page 4: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Sample O-scope Image

Reset Gate

DSI output B

Raw video B

Raw video A

Page 5: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

ACS-R Optimization Campaign

Background: • ACS-R Optimization Campaign (OC) in SMOV begins ~10

days after ACS-R installation and AT/FT

• 8 iterations over 24 days designed to optimize CCD read noise, dark current, CTE, full-well depth, linearity, cross-talk, and data transmission timing

• Bias, dark, flat, EPER, and subarray images taken at different gain, CDS modes (DSI and Clamp & Sample), and readout speeds.

• Teledyne and GSFC will analyze O-mode data; STScI will

analyze image data.

Page 6: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Optimization Campaign Timeline

• Visits A and G (general performance tests) are executed in all iterations• Visits B, C, D, E, and F optimize specific performance characteristics

(settling times, clock coupling, voltages) and are not executed in all iterations

• Visits A, B, D, E, and F contain image data• Visits B, C, and G contain O-mode data• OC may be truncated at SMS boundary (currently between Iters 5 & 6)

Page 7: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

ACS-R OC Dry Run

• Complicated technical and logistical issues demand Dry Run rehearsal of OC in February/March time frame Completed yesterday!

• GSFC, Teledyne, and STScI participated

• GSFC configured EM-3 unit (CEB-R and LVPS-R) and Build-5 WFC in ESTIF

• Only first 4 iterations of the OC were simulated

• All iterations were SMS driven

Dry Run dates and durations:

Iteration 1: Feb 11-13 31 hr SMSIteration 2: Feb 23, Mar 2-3 15 hr SMSIteration 3: Mar 5-6, 9-10 27 hr SMSIteration 4: Mar 12-13, 16-18 18 hr SMS

Page 8: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Dry Run Personnel

Olivia Lupie, Steve Arslanian, Kevin Boyce, Rick Burley, Darryl Dye, Dennis Garland, Mike Kelly, Kathleen Mil, Barbara Scott, Beverly Serrano, Colleen Townsley, Augustyn Waczynski, Erin Wilson

GSFC:

ACS-R PI:

Ed Cheng (Conceptual Analytics)

Teledyne:

Markus Loose, Raphael Ricardo

STScI:

David Golimowski, Linda Smith, Marco Sirianni (ESTEC), Carl Biagetti, George Chapman, Marco Chiaberge, Tyler Desjardins, Norman Grogin, Tracy Ellis, Pey-Lian Lim, Ray Lucas, Aparna Maybhate, Max Mutchler, Anatoly Suchkov (JHU), Mike Swam, Tom Wheeler

Page 9: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Dry Run Results (1)

Iteration 1 : a bumpy start

• All performance and optimization tests executed to assess baseline

• Bias & clock voltages set for WFC#4 (Flight build)

• Problems found in several areas:

1) ESTIF: Lamp too bright (saturated data); “un-dark” biases and darks

2) SMS: No 1-min delay between changes of gain or CDS 3) OPUS: Crashes and incorrect keywords exposed outdated EUDL

and CCDTAB reference files 4) FT: Mismatched gain/offset parameters; subarray readout

problem

Items 1-3 fixed for Iteration 2; FT issues now resolved

• Despite limited data, STScI correctly assessed read noise and limited full-well depth expected for non-optimal initial voltage configuration.

Page 10: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Dry Run Results (2)

Iteration 2:

• General performance tests (A & G) and one optimization test (C)

• Bias & clock voltages set for WFC#5 (flight spare) • Full-speed read noise 4.0-4.5 e– (DSI); 4.5-5.0 e– (C&S) Variable striation in bias images attributed to 1/f noise from MOSFET

• Lamp now too faint; full-well exposure not obtained Full-well depth raised to > 60K e–

• Bias offset for half-speed DSI frames too low; ADC saturated at low end

• High frequency vertical striping in half-speed, C&S A-amp bias frames

• Lack of hot pixels & cosmic rays preclude CTE and cross-talk tests

Page 11: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Iteration 2: Bias Frames

Full speed, Dual-Slope Integrator

Full speed, Clamp & Sample

Page 12: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Iteration 2: Bias Frames

Half speed, Dual-Slope Integrator

Half speed, Clamp & Sample

Page 13: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Dry Run Results (3)

Iteration 3:

• General performance tests (A & G) and 2 optimization tests (D and E)

• Bias & clock voltages set for WFC#5 (flight spare) • Lamp brightness well matched to on-orbit cal lamp Full-well depth measured at nominal ~80K e–

• Visit D — Bias Voltage Optimization Test: Read noise lower, amp gains more consistent with VOD = VDD =

+1 V

• Visit E — Clock Voltage Optimization Test: CTE too good for analysis software; need to improve algorithm

• Half-speed read noise 3.5-4.5 e– (DSI); 6.5-7.0 e– (C&S) DSI: ~0.5 e– better than full-speed C&S: significantly worse than full-speed

Page 14: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Iteration 3: Photon Transfer Test

• Full-well depth measured at nominal ~80K e–

• Gain = 2.3 e– /DN• Excellent linearity

Page 15: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Dry Run Results (4)Iteration 4: • General performance tests (A & G) and 2 optimization tests (C

and F)

• “Up-linked” new default VOD and VDD for Iteration 4

• Visit F — Science Data Transmission Optimization Test: Find optimal size and delays of bit transfers from CEB-R to

MEB

Page 16: ACS-R Optimization Campaign Dry Run:  Status Report

Summary and Imminent Tasks

• Dry Run was extremely useful for testing analysis software, training analysts, verifying communication and data flow, and exposing bugs and features. STScI is well prepared to tackle “The Real Thing.”

• Need to verify and summarize analysis of all Iterations for Dry Run debrief

• Need to revise some analysis software with newly exposed flaws

• Rerun all data through OPUS to ensure proper keyword population • Insert 1-extra day of analysis for each iteration into SMOV timeline SMSes take longer than expected to execute; data will come to us

less promptly and frequently during OC; need more thinking time.

• Ensure that successful implementation of FT is captured in EVA-3 command plan

Review of revised CP occurred yesterday; all proposed changes found to be in order and accepted.