Acjs2012 Presentation

1

Restorative Justice

&Race

…A Theoretical Analysis

Jacqueline Roebuck Sakho, Duquesne University

Thursday, March 15, 2012

2012 ACJS Conference

March 15, 2012

2

RJ & Race

Theories to frame the discussion

• Critical Legal Theory

• Conard’s “Macrojustice” (Conard 1971)

• Critical Dialogic Approach (Nagda & Gurin, 2007)

Roebuck Sakho 20122

3

Why RJ?

“It is no longer clear that law can produce a more just society” (Merry 1995 p 12)

Roebuck Sakho 20123

4

Restorative Justice

Frames

March 15, 2012

5

RJ Cycle

Roebuck Sakho 20125

6

RJ Spectrum

Roebuck Sakho 20126

7

Restorative Justice & Race

Theoretical Frameworks

March 15, 2012

8

Restorative Justice

As Critical Legal Theory

March 15, 2012

9

Restorative Justice & CLT

• RJ troubles and disrupts accepted norms and standards in legal theory and practice

• RJ interrogates dimensions of power within both inter intra relationships

Roebuck Sakho 20129

10

Restorative Justice

Conard’s “Macrojustice”

Conard, 1971, p. 420)

March 15, 2012

11

Why RJ?

“We conceptualize law as more plural not located entirely in the state. And we see the “effects” of law in far broader post-Foucauldian terms.” (Merry, 1995 p. 12)

Roebuck Sakho 201211

12

Conardian Formula

Roebuck Sakho 201212

13

Conardian Formula

Reflection• “Nonomics”

• Quantitative

• Aggregative

Action• Law in action vs. Law

in books

• Measuring the effectiveness of processes/procedures

• Beyond the impact of the system on one case but a number of cases

Roebuck Sakho 201213

14

RJ in Conardian terms…

“Microjustice”• The Law

• The State

• The individual

“Macrojustice”• The Law as “total

consequences” (p. 420)

• Systemic Social Conflict

• Community Impact

Roebuck Sakho 201214

15

Restorative Justice

A Critical Dialogic Approach

March 15, 2012

16

Critical Dialogic Approach

• Three Components (Nagda & Gurin 2007, p. 36)• Critical analysis and understanding

of difference and dominance• Discursive engagement across

differences• Debate Discussion Dialogue (p.

37)

• Sustained and conjoint community building and conflict engagement

Roebuck Sakho 201216

17

Why RJ?

“…the hope for reform has moved to more bottom-up, small scale changes.” (Merry, 1995, p. 15)

Roebuck Sakho 201217

18

ReferencesConard, A. (1971) Macrojustice: A systematic approach to conflict resolution. Georgia Law Review, 5(3), 415

Merry, Sally Engle (1994)Resistance and the cultural power of law. Law & Society Review, 29 (1) 11

Nagda B.A., Gurin, P. (2007) Intergrouop dialogue: A critical-dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality, and social justice. 111, 35.

Roebuck Sakho18

19

Restorative Justice & Race

March 15, 2012