-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
1/9
Technical Report
Investigations on dry sliding wear behavior of in situ casted
AA7075TiC
metal matrix composites by using Taguchi technique
S. Baskaran, V. Anandakrishnan , Muthukannan Duraiselvam
Department of Production Engineering, National Institute of
Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 January 2014
Accepted 31 March 2014
Available online 12 April 2014
a b s t r a c t
High strength 7075 aluminum matrix composites with 4 and 8 wt.%
of TiC particulate reinforcement was
synthesized by reactive in situ casting technique. X-ray
diffraction analysis and scanning electron micros-
copy were used to confirm the presence of TiC particles and its
uniform distribution over the aluminum
matrix. The dry sliding wear behavior of the as-casted
composites was investigated based on Taguchi L27orthogonal array
experimental design to examine the significance of reinforcement
quantity, load, sliding
velocity and sliding distance on wear rate. The combination of 4
wt.% of TiC, 9.81 N load, 3 m/s sliding
velocity and 1500 m sliding distance was identified as the
optimum blend for minimum wear rate using
the main effect plot. Load and sliding velocity were identified
as the highly contributing significant
parameters on the wear rate using ANOVA analysis. Further a
confirmation test was also conducted with
the optimum parameter combination for validation of the Taguchi
results.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Light weight monolithic alloys are reinforced with hard
second
phase particles to produce metal matrix composites, with
enhanced physical and mechanical properties, by suitable
combi-
nations of matrix, reinforcements and processing routes,
which
in turn increase their utilization in numerous applications.
Partic-
ulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites, a class
of
metal matrix composites takes ample attention in automobile
and aerospace industries due to their light weight, easy
fabrication,
low cost, high wear resistance and isotropic properties [1].
The
production of composites are commonly done by various
methods,
such as self-propagating high temperature synthesis[2],
mechani-
cal alloying[3], reactive slag process[4], vacuum pressure
infiltra-
tion[5], direct metal laser sintering [6], spray deposition[7],
stir
casting (ex situ)[8] and reactive processing (in situ)[9].
However,in situ processing methods are prominent being economic,
easy
and contributing several advantages over other methods like
uni-
form distribution of very fine reinforcements, high
interfacial
bonding strength between matrix and reinforcement, high
degree
of thermodynamic stability and grain refinement [9,10]. The
most
universally used particle reinforcements revealed by vast
literature
are TiC, Al4C3, SiC, Al2O3, B4C, TiB2 and ZrB2, in which TiC has
par-
ticular consideration due to its high hardness, high elastic
modu-
lus, low density, low chemical reactivity, good wettability
with
molten aluminum, thermodynamic stability and freedom from
observed gases[11].Discontinuously reinforced aluminum based
metal matrix com-
posites generally posses superior tribological properties
when
compared with unreinforced aluminum alloys[12]. To
understand
the tribological behavior of composites, so far several
investiga-
tions were attempted, including the study of dry sliding
wear
behavior of as-casted SiC reinforced aluminum metal matrix
com-
posites by Ma et al. [13]. The dry sliding wear behavior of
alumi-
num and aluminum matrix composites reinforced with different
volume percentages of SiC was studied by Bauri and Surappa
[14]and Jha et al.[15]using pin-on-disc method.
Tyagi[16]fabri-
cated the in situ AlTiC composites with different volume
fractions
and investigated its dry sliding wear behavior. Kumar et al.
[17]
studied the abrasive wear behavior of in situ formed Al4Cu/TiB
2
composite at normal load of 1050 N. Mandal et al.
[18]fabricatedAl12Si/TiB2composite by reaction between K2TiF6and
KBF4salts
and analyzed the role of TiB2content in dry sliding wear
behavior.
Venkataraman and Sundararajan [19] studied the formation and
fracture of the mechanically mixed layer during dry sliding
wear
analysis of AA7075/SiC composites.
Design of experiments (DOE) is a most useful statistical
tool
employed in many areas including but not limited to:
engineering,
medical, basic science, agriculture, management for design
com-
parison, variable identification, design optimization, process
con-
trol and product performance prediction. Taguchi technique a
well known DOE tool was used by Basavarajappa et al. [20] to
study the effect of applied load, sliding speed and sliding
distance
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.074
0261-3069/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 431 2503521; fax: +91 431
2500133.
E-mail address:[email protected](V. Anandakrishnan).
Materials and Design 60 (2014) 184192
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials and Design
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m
/ l o c a t e / m a t d e s
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
2/9
on dry sliding wear behavior of SiC and graphite particles
rein-
forced aluminum composites and identified that sliding
distance
has the highest influence on their wear behavior. Using
L27Taguchi
experimental design, Mahapatra and Patnaik [21] studied the
mechanical and erosion wear behavior of hybrid composites
and
Sahoo [22] optimized the process parameters for wear
behavior
of electroless NiP coatings against steel. Sahin
[23]investigated
the abrasive wear behavior of AA201415 wt.%SiC composite
byL9Taguchi design and used analysis of variance(ANOVA) to
analyze
the wear parameters. Koksal et al.[24]studied the effect of
sliding
velocity, normal load, sliding distance and reinforcement ratio
on
dry sliding wear behavior Al/AlB2composites and optimized
these
parameters to get minimum wear rate by using L9Taguchi
orthog-
onal array. Owing to above all, in the present work,
aluminum
7075 based TiC reinforced metal matrix composites with
varying
TiC content were fabricated by in situ reactive process and
their
tribological behavior is investigated in a pin-on-disc
tribo-meter
using Taguchi technique. Further the effect of reinforcement
per-
centage, sliding velocity and load on the dry sliding wear
behavior
of the developed composites is analyzed using standard
statistical
tools.
2. Experimental details
2.1. Synthesis of composite material and experimental design
Aluminum alloy 7075 used for fabrication of the composite
was
analyzed for purity and original chemical composition
was obtained as shown in Table 1. Initially 1.5 kg of AA7075
was
allowed to melt in a graphite crucible inside an electrical
resistance
furnace and the molten aluminum was maintained at a tempera-
ture of 900 C. In order to obtain composites having
different
weight percentages of TiC reinforcement by in situ casting
tech-
nique, the appropriate weight of halide salt K 2TiF6 and
graphite
powder to be added are stoichiometrically calculated and the
same
is given inTable 2. The carefully weighed halide and graphite
pow-
ders are mixed, preheated at 250 C for 2 h to eliminate
moisture
and gently introduced into the molten aluminum at 900 C to
get
stable and fine TiC particles[25,26]. Once in every 10 min, the
melt
was stirred by using a graphite stirrer for allowing formation
of
uniformly distributed TiC in the matrix alloy. During the in
situ
process, the process parameters such as melting temperature,
time
allowed for reaction are strictly adhered to standards available
in
various literatures[1,2,4,11]. During the time of stirring, the
occur-
rence of exothermic chemical reaction between molten
aluminum
and the powders was observed by the drastic raise in melt
temper-
ature. Thus, the raise in temperature in turn increased the
fluidity
of the melt and enhanced the formation of more amounts of
uniformly distributed fine TiC particles inside the melt.
The
exothermic chemical reaction pertaining to the above process
is
as follows[11]:
3K2TiF6 4Al ! 3Ti 3KAlF4 K3AlF6 1
Ti 3Al ! Al3Ti 2
Al3Ti C ! TiC 3Al 3
The byproducts of the chemical reaction escaped as gases and
remaining floated as slag because of its low density, as
explained
elsewhere[1]. The reaction ended at around one hour which
was
observed by the absence of escaping gases and reaction
sparks
After removing the slag, the molten composite was poured
into
the 250 C preheated permanent mould and allowed to get
cooled
and solidified. Finally, the castings were removed from the
mould
and cut into the desired shape and size. The same procedure
was
followed to produce composites of different weight percentages
o
reinforcement by adding the required amount of salt and
graphite
powder as given inTable 2. In order to study the effect of
addition
of TiC reinforcement in the AA7075, one set of casting was
produced
without adding salt and graphite powder in the AA7075 melt
which
is further referred as AA70750 wt.%TiC throughout this article.
To
confirm the presence of various elements and TiC particles in
thecastings, X-ray diffraction analysis was performed on the
as-casted
Table 1
Chemical composition of AA7075 alloy (%).
Fe Si Mn Mg Zn Cu Ti Cr Al
0.215 0.0588 0.0524 2.06 5.52 1.56 0.0362 0.180 Remaining
Table 2
Quantity of halide salt and graphite powders added for obtaining
various composi
tions of materials.
Material composition Quantity of powder added (g)
K2TiF6 Graphite
AA70750 wt.%TiC 0 0
AA70754 wt.%TiC 240.54 12.03
AA70758 wt.%TiC 481.08 24.06
Table 3
Control factors and their levels.
Control factors Units Level
1 2 3
Reinforcement wt.% 0 4 8
Load N 9.81 19.62 29.43
Sliding velocity m/s 1 2 3
Sliding distance m 1000 1500 2000
Table 4
Experimental results for wear rate with calculated S/N
ratios.
Expt.
no.
Reinforcement
(wt.%)
Load
(N)
Sliding
velocity
(m/s)
Sliding
distance
(m)
Wear rate
(mm3/m)
S/N
ratio
1 0 9.81 1 1000 0.00191 54.38
2 0 9.81 2 1500 0.00147 56.65
3 0 9.81 3 2000 0.00109 59.20
4 0 19.62 1 1500 0.00290 50.75
5 0 19.62 2 2000 0.00253 51.94
6 0 19.62 3 1000 0.00367 48.71
7 0 29.43 1 2000 0.00485 46.28
8 0 29.43 2 1000 0.00266 51.50
9 0 29.43 3 1500 0.00230 52.76
10 4 9.81 1 1000 0.00264 51.56
11 4 9.81 2 1500 0.00149 56.53
12 4 9.81 3 2000 0.00070 63.09
13 4 19.62 1 1500 0.00395 48.06
14 4 19.62 2 2000 0.00242 52.32
15 4 19.62 3 1000 0.00278 51.11
16 4 29.43 1 2000 0.00441 47.11
17 4 29.43 2 1000 0.00228 52.84
18 4 29.43 3 1500 0.00142 56.95
19 8 9.81 1 1000 0.00193 54.28
20 8 9.81 2 1500 0.00138 57.20
21 8 9.81 3 2000 0.00126 57.99
22 8 19.62 1 1500 0.00369 48.65
23 8 19.62 2 2000 0.00286 50.87
24 8 19.62 3 1000 0.00213 53.43
25 8 29.43 1 2000 0.00501 46.00
26 8 29.43 2 1000 0.00308 50.22
27 8 29.43 3 1500 0.00229 52.80
S. Baskaran et al./ Materials and Design 60 (2014) 184192
185
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
3/9
material samples. Further, to see the size, distribution and
morphol-
ogy of the in situ formed TiC particles and the grain structure
of the
as-casted materials, microstructures were obtained by
scanningelectron microscopy after etching with kellers etchant.
2.2. Wear test
The dry sliding wear tests were conducted as per ASTM: G99
to
evaluate the dry sliding wear behavior of the as-casted
materials in
a DUCOM pin on disc wear testing machine. Based on the
avail-
able literatures [1324], amount of reinforcement, applied
load,
sliding velocity, and sliding distance were identified as the
impor-
tant dry sliding wear testing parameters and they are varied
in
three levels as shown in Table 3. In order to reduce the
number
of experiments for the selected parameters and their levels, a
stan-
dard Taguchi L27 orthogonal array was preferred to conduct
the
experiments as shown inTable 4. Wear sample pins of 6 mm
diam-
eter and 31 mm height prepared from the as-casted materials
were
allowed to slide over hardened D3 steel counterpart disc having
a
hardness of 63 HRC. In order to study the wear behavior of the
pin,
keeping the counterpart without wear, the counterpart was
chosen
to have hardness higher than that of the pin. The end faces of
the
sample pins and contacting counterpart, polished to a
surface
roughness close to 1 lm were kept perfectly flat in order to
get
uniform contact between pin and disc during the wear test.
Before
and after each experimental run, the pin and the disc were
cleanedwith acetone, dried and their masses were measured using an
elec-
tronic weighing machine with least count 0.0001 g. The mass of
the
disc was carefully examined to confirm that there was no
consid-
erable wear in the counterpart as the mass loss of pin alone
was
taken as a measure of sliding wear. The wear rate of the
sample
pin was calculated by using the standard formula for wear
rate
(Eq.(4)) as used elsewhere[27], for each and every
experimental
run and provided inTable 4.
Wear rate mm3=m Mass loss=density
Sliding distance
4
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction results of as-casted AA7075 and
composites.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
TiC
TiC
Fig. 2. SEM image of the AA7075 matrix composites with TiC
reinforcement: (a) 0 wt.%, (b) 4 wt.%, (c) 8 wt.% and (d) 4
wt.%.
Table 5
Response table for S/N ratios (smaller is better).
Level Reinforcement Load Sliding velocity Sliding distance
1 52.47 56.77 49.68 52.01
2 53.29 50.65 53.34 53.38
3 52.39 50.72 55.12 52.76
Delta 0.90 6.12 5.44 1.37
Rank 4 1 2 3
186 S. Baskaran et al. / Materials and Design 60 (2014)
184192
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
4/9
3. Results and discussion
3.1. X-ray diffraction analysis
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-casted AA70750
wt.%TiC and the composites with different weight percentages
of TiC reinforcement are shown inFig. 1. It is observed that,
peaks
corresponding to aluminum are present in all the three
materials,
whereas TiC peaks are present in AA70754 wt.%TiC and AA7075
8 wt.%TiC composites and no other reaction product peaks are
seen.
Comparing the XRD peaks of composites, it is observed that
the
intensity of the peaks corresponding to TiC is found to be
higher
with increased amount of TiC in the materials.
3.2. Scanning electron microscopy
The scanning electron microscopy images of AA70750 wt.%TiC,
AA70754 wt.%TiC and AA70758 wt.%TiC are shown in Fig. 2(ad).
Veryclear grainboundaries with the presence of precipitates
homo-geneously distributed along the grain boundaries are observed
in
Fig. 2(a) corresponding to AA70750 wt.%TiC. FromFig. 2(b and
c),
thegrain sizes areobservedto be relatively reduced with
increasing
amount of TiC particles. The formed TiC particles are found to
be
segregated along the grain boundaries homogeneously as seen
in
Fig. 2(bd). The appearance of TiC particles which is observed
by
thick grain boundaries is found to be more in AA70754
wt.%TiC
(Fig. 2(b)) and further more in AA70758 wt.%TiC (Fig. 2(c))
corre-
sponding to theamount of halidesalt andgraphitepowder
addition,
which is also evident by the intensity of corresponding peaks
in
their respective XRD patterns (Fig. 1). At higher magnification
as
shown in Fig. 2(d), the interfaces between the aluminum
matrix
and TiCparticles areclearlyobserved, andalso
theuniformdistribu-
tion of TiC particles is observed along the grain boundaries
with theappearance of some TiC particles dispersed inside the
aluminum
matrix grains. The individual TiC particle measuring around 2
lm
could be seen visibly with its clear boundary and the
interfaces
between the TiC particlesare also observed in higher
magnification.
All these observations are in good agreement with earlier
litera-
tures, which states that the uniform distribution of
reinforcement
particles, strong and clear interface between matrix and
reinforce-
mentparticles, formation of reinforcement with size in few
microns,
etc. are the possible advantages of in situ formation of
reinforce-
ment over ex situ processes[1,4,9].
3.3. Statistical analysis
In Taguchi method, the objective function is converted to
Signalto Noise (S/N) ratio which is treated as the quality
characteristic. In
the present work, wear rate is taken as the objective function
and
Taguchis Lower the Better quality characteristic is chosen
to
minimize the objective function (i.e. wear rate).
3.3.1. Analysis of factors
To analyze the effect of factors influencing wear rate, the
S/N
ratio values for all the experimental trials as shown in Table
4
are calculated using the statistical tool Minitab 16. The delta
values
for individual factors are derived from the S/N ratio values
as
shown inTable 5, using which the order of influencing factors
on
wear rate from high to low is identified as load, sliding
velocity
sliding distance and reinforcement respectively. From the
maineffect plot as shown in Fig. 3, it is observed that in order to
get
840
0.0035
0.0030
0.0025
0.0020
0.0015
29.4319.629.81
321
0.0035
0.0030
0.0025
0.0020
0.0015
200015001000
Reinforcement (wt.%)
M
ean
Load (N)
Sliding velocity (m/s) Sliding distance (m)
Fig. 3. Main effect plot for wear rate in mm3/m.
Fig. 4. Depth of wear of AA70758 wt.%TiC composite with respect
to sliding
distance (up to 1000 m) at sliding velocity: (a) 1 m/s, (b) 2
m/s and (c) 3 m/s.
S. Baskaran et al./ Materials and Design 60 (2014) 184192
187
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
5/9
minimum wear rate, the optimal process parameters should be
in
middle level for reinforcement (4 wt.%TiC), low level for
load
(9.81 N), high level for sliding velocity (3 m/s) and middle
level
for sliding distance (1500 m). Further it is also observed from
the
main effect plot that load has the strongest influence on wear
ratefollowed by sliding velocity and amount of reinforcement.
The
load, being the predominating factor on wear rate, when
increased
from 9.81 N to 29.43 N for AA70758 wt.%TiC composite, for all
the
sliding velocities tested, the depth of wear is highly
responsive and
found increasing as observed from Fig. 4(ac). This shows
that,
when the load increases, the hard asperity of the counterface
mate-rial ploughs the softer surface of the pin deeper which is
Fig. 5. (a) Worn surface of AA70758 wt.%TiC composite for 29.43
N load at 1 m/s sliding velocity and (b) magnified view of zone
A.
Element Weight (%) Atomic (%)
O K 33.04 48.07
Al K 53.72 46.34
Ti K 3.89 1.89
Fe K 6.22 2.59
Zn L 3.13 1.11
Totals 100.00
Fig. 6. Energy dispersive spectroscopy of worn surface of
AA70754 wt.%TiC composite after sliding 2000 m with 3 m/s sliding
velocity at 9.81 N load.
188 S. Baskaran et al. / Materials and Design 60 (2014)
184192
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
6/9
apparently seen in the worn surface of AA70758 wt.%TiC
compos-
ite for highest load at 1 m/s sliding velocity as shown in Fig.
5(a
and b). Further, along the sliding direction, the worn surface
is
observed with severe plastic deformation leading to formation
of
parallel deep grooves with wear debris spread all over. The
trend
of higher depth of wear at higher load as observed is similar
to
the findings reported by several investigators
[3,5,8,13,14,16,18].
The stress concentration during sliding at higher load is
more
at the sharp edges of the TiC particles which initiate cracks
in
the matrix adjacent to the TiC particles which further
propagates
parallel to the sliding direction and thereby gets segmented
and
forms debris[28]. Thus, the debris formed in between the
sliding
surfaces further plough the pin surfaces creating parallel and
dee-
per ploughs all along the sliding surface as shown in Fig. 5(a).
All
these mechanisms contribute severe plastic deformation or
severewear on pin surface while sliding in dry environment at
higher
loads. When the sliding velocity increases generally the
amount
of heat generation elevates because of increased friction
between
the sliding surfaces[29]. At this elevated temperature, the soft
alu-
minum matrix on the pin gets severe plastic deformation and
leads
to formation of mixture of the oxide surface known as
mechani-
cally mixed layer (MML) which allows smooth sliding of the
mat-
ing surface thereby reducing the wear rate[28]as observed in
the
main effect plot for higher velocity. The formation of oxide in
the
worn surface of AA70754 wt.%TiC composite after sliding
2000 m with higher sliding velocity (3 m/s) at low load (9.81
N)
condition is evidenced by the identification of O, Al, Ti, Fe
and Zn
peaks in the selected zone (spectrum 2) by the energy
dispersive
spectroscopic analysis as shown inFig. 6. This behavior of low
wearrate for higher sliding velocity was obtained in C/ZrO2
composites
and reported by Jha et al. [15]and Zhu et al. [30]in their
earlier
research work.
In any interaction graph, the parallel lines indicate the
absence
and non parallel lines indicate significant presence of
interaction
effect of factors on the response. From the interaction plot for
wear
rate as shown inFig. 7, it is observed that the interactions of
rein-
forcement with load is insignificant for lower loads and
significant
at higher load, the reason is at higher loads and large amount
of
reinforcement, the ploughs formed are deeper, wider and more
in numbers which in-turn increases the wear rate. The
interaction
of load with sliding distance is significant for highest load
after
sliding long distance is contrary to that of the other two low
load
conditions because of the formation of more amount of larger
deb-ris which in-turn increases the wear rate. The interaction of
sliding
velocity with sliding distance for lowest and highest velocities
is
observed to be converse because of the softening of matrix
mate-
rial at higher velocity which provides smooth sliding with
lower
wear rate. The interaction of reinforcement with sliding
velocity
and sliding distance and also the interaction between load
and
sliding velocity are observed to be insignificant as the lines
o
interaction are almost parallel.
Contour bands indicating ranges of wear rate against (a)
rein-
forcement, load; (b) reinforcement, sliding velocity; (c)
reinforce-
ment, sliding distance; (d) load, sliding velocity; (e) load,
sliding
distance; and (f) sliding velocity, sliding distance are shown
in
Fig. 8(af). From the contours shown inFig. 8(a), it is observed
that
for all the materials tested the wear rate is less than 0.002 mm
3/m
when the load is lower than 12 N, 0.0020.003 mm3/m when the
load is 1219 N and 0.0030.004 mm3/m when the load is higherthan
19 N. Whereas, when the load is above 26 N, an exceptiona
wear rate of less than 0.003 mm3/m is observed only for
AA7075
4 wt.%TiC composite which shows that theAA70754 wt.%TiC com-
posite is having better wear resistance than AA7075 alloy
and
AA70758 wt.%TiC composite at higher load. When the sliding
velocity is higher than 2 m/s, a better wear range of 0.001
0.002 mm3/m is observed irrespective of the amount of
reinforce-
ment as shown in Fig. 8(b). But for lower sliding velocity (1
m/s)
the wear rate is observed to be higher than 0.003 mm 3/m for
al
the materials tested. From Fig. 8(c) it is observed that, the
wear rate
for AA70754 wt.%TiC composite is less than 0.0025 mm3/m for
a
wider range of sliding distance from 1100 m to 2000 m,
whereas
for AA70758 wt.%TiC composite the wear rate is more than
0.0025 mm3/m above the sliding distance of 1550 m. From theabove
inferences, it is apparent that AA70754 wt.%TiC composite
exhibits superior wear resistance than AA7075 alloy and
AA7075
8 wt.%TiC composite. From the contour bands observed in
Fig. 8(d) it is apparent that the wear rate is high in the range
o
0.0040.005 mm3/m for low sliding velocity and high load
combi-
nation. Whereas, a better wear range of 0.0010.002 mm3/m is
observed for the combination of low load and high sliding
velocity
A moderate wear range of 0.00200.0025 mm3/m is observed for
high load at higher sliding velocity. The wear rate is high and
above
0.004 mm3/m for higher sliding distance at higher load as shown
in
Fig. 8(e). Whereas, the wear rate is less than 0.0020 mm3/m for
a
wide range of sliding distance from 1100 m to 2000 m at low
load
condition. It is evident fromFig. 8(f) that the wear rate is
minimum
when the sliding velocity is higher than 2 m/s for a wider range
ofsliding distance from 1150 m to 2000 m.
Fig. 7. Interaction plot for wear rate in mm3/m.
S. Baskaran et al./ Materials and Design 60 (2014) 184192
189
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
7/9
3.3.2. ANOVA analysisANOVA, a statistical tool is used to find
out the significance of
the parameters on the wear rate. From the analysis of
variance
for S/N ratios of the wear rate shown in Table 6 with
computed
R-Sq value of 92.66%, load and sliding velocity are identified
as
the significant parameters with 50.09% and 31.26%
contribution
respectively. The effect of reinforcement and sliding distance
on
the wear rate is found to be insignificant with very low
percentage
contributions.
3.3.3. Regression analysis
To predict the wear rate within the specified level values
of
parameters, using regression analysis, a second order
polynomial
regression equation for wear rate with significant parameters
is
derived withR-Sq value of 91.48% and given as Eq. (5)
Wear rate mm3=m
0:0000178 0:000265 B 0:000182 C
0:0000048 B B
0:0000464 B C 0:0000000513 B D
0:000352 C C
0:000000735 C D 0:000000751 A B
0:0000516 A C
0:0000000618 A D
8>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:
9>>>>>>>>>>>=>>>>>>>>>>>;
5
whereAis Reinforcement in wt.%, Bis Load in N, Cis Sliding
velocity
in m/s and D is Sliding distance in m. The residuals (errors)
are
found to be normally distributed along the straight line in
the
normal probability plot for wear rate as shown in Fig. 9.
(a)
(b)
0.0030
0.0030
0.0025
0.0020
Reinforcement (wt.%)
Load(N)
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
Wear rate
0.0040
0.0020
0.0035
0.0030
0.0025
0.0020
Reinforcement (wt.%)
Slidingvelocity(m/s)
8763210 54
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
Wear rate0.0010
8763210 54
(c)
0.0025
0.0025
Reinforcement (wt.%)
Slidingdistance(m)
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
Wear rate
0.0020
0.0030
0.0030
8763210 54
(d)
0.00400.00350.0030
0.0025 0.00250.0020
Load (N)
Slidingvelocity(m/s)
01 21 41 61 81 02 22 42 62 82
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
0.0050
Wear rate
0.0050
0.0010
0.0020
(e)
(f)
0.0035
0.0030
0.00250.0020
Load (N)
Slidingdistance(m)
01 21 41 61 81 02 22 42 62 82
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
Wear rate 0.0040
0.0035
0.0020
0.0040
0.0035
0.0030
0.0025
0.0025
0.0020
Sliding velocity (m/s)
Slidingdistance(m)
3.02.52.01.51.0
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
Wear rate0.0050
0.0010
0.0030
Fig. 8. Contour plot for wear rate with respect to: (a) load,
reinforcement, (b) sliding velocity, reinforcement, (c) sliding
distance, reinforcement, (d) sliding velocity, load, (e)
sliding distance, load and (f) sliding distance, sliding
velocity.
190 S. Baskaran et al. / Materials and Design 60 (2014)
184192
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
8/9
4. Confirmation test
A confirmation test was conducted based on the combination
of
optimal level (i.e. A2B1C3D2) of each parameter obtained
from
main effect plot and response table of wear rate. A very low
per-
centage error of 3.75% is obtained between the predicted and
experimental value showing a very good correlation as shown
in
Table 7.
5. Conclusions
The dry sliding wear tests were conducted by pin-on-disc
wear
tester on the in situ fabricated AA7075 and AA7075 metal
matrix
composites containing 4 and 8 weight percentages of TiC
reinforce-
ment using a Taguchi L27 orthogonal array design. The
followingconclusions are made from this study.
(1) The AA7075 matrix TiC reinforced composites were
success-
fully fabricated through in situ casting technique.
(2) The XRD analysis confirmed the presence of TiC particles
in
the composites.
(3) SEM analysis showed that TiC particles were uniformly
dis-
tributed along the grain boundaries and the average size of
in situ formed TiC particles was found to be less than 2 lm
(4) From the main effect plot, the optimal level combination
for
minimum wear rate was identified as 4 wt.%TiC reinforce-
ment, 9.81 N load, 3 m/s sliding velocity and 1500 m sliding
distance (i.e. A2B1C3D2).(5) From the ANOVA analysis, the
significant parameters were
identified as load and sliding velocity with percentage con-
tribution of 50.09% and 31.26% respectively withR-Sq value
of 92.66%.
(6) Finally from the confirmation test conducted based on
the
optimal level combination, the obtained wear rate wa
found to be very close to predicted value with a minor error
of 3.75%.
References
[1] Tjong SC, Ma ZY. Microstructural and mechanical
characteristics of in situmetal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng
2000;R29:49113.
[2] Li P, Kandalova EG, Nikitin VI. In situ synthesis of AlTiC
in aluminum meltMater Lett 2005;59:25458.
Table 6
Analysis of variance for S/N ratios of wear rate.
Source Df a Seq SSb Adj SSc Adj MSd F Pe P(%)
Reinforcement 2 4.516 4.516 2.258 0.42 0.677 1.02
Load 2 221.990 221.990 110.995 20.48 0.002 50.09
Sliding velocity 2 138.537 138.537 69.268 12.78 0.007 31.26
Sliding distance 2 8.470 8.470 4.235 0.78 0.499 1.91
Reinforcement load 4 8.114 8.114 2.028 0.37 0.820 1.83
Reinforcement sliding velocity 4 20.040 20.040 5.010 0.92 0.508
4.52Reinforcement sliding distance 4 9.037 9.037 2.259 0.42 0.792
2.04
Error 6 32.513 32.513 5.419 7.33
Total 26 443.21 100.00
S= 2.32784; R-Sq = 92.66%; and R-Sq(adj) = 68.21%.a Degrees of
freedom.b Sequential sums of squares.c Adjusted sums of squares.d
Adjusted mean squares.e Probability.
0.00
6
0.005
0.00
4
0.00
3
0.00
2
0.00
1
0.00
0
-0.001
99
95
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
5
1
Wear rate
Percent
M ea n 0 .00 25 59
StDev 0.001130
N 27
AD 0.420
P-Value 0.302
Normal - 95% CI
Fig. 9. Normal probability plot for wear rate.
Table 7
Confirmation experiment result.
Op timal c ontrol p arameters Error (%)
Predicted Experimental
Level A2B1C3D2 A2B1C3D2 3.75
Wear rate (mm3/m) 0.0006211 0.0005978
S. Baskaran et al./ Materials and Design 60 (2014) 184192
191
-
5/21/2018
ac.els-cdn.com_S0261306914002672_1-s2.0-S0261306914002672-main
9/9
[3] Arik H, Ozcatalbas Y, Turker M. Dry sliding wear behavior of
in situ AlAl4C3metal matrix composite produced by mechanical
alloying technique. MaterDes 2006;27:799804.
[4] Sheibani S, Najafabadi MF. In situ fabrication of AlTiC
metal matrixcomposites by reactive slag process. Mater Des
2007;28:23738.
[5] Liu L, Li W, Tang Y, Shen B, Hu W. Friction and wear
properties of short carbonfiber reinforced aluminum matrix
composites. Wear 2009;266:7338.
[6] Ghosh SK, Saha P. Crack and wear behavior of SiC particulate
reinforcedaluminium based metal matrix composite fabricated by
direct metal lasersintering process. Mater Des 2011;32:13945.
[7] Wang F, Liu H, Yang B. Effect of in situ TiC particulate on
the wear resistance ofspray-deposited 7075 Al matrix composite.
Mater Charact 2005;54:44650.
[8] Shorowordi KM, Haseeb ASMA, Celis JP. Tribo-surface
characteristics of AlB 4Cand AlSiC composites worn under different
contact pressures. Wear2006;261:63441.
[9] Ramesh CS, Pramod S, Keshavamurthy R. A study on
microstructure andmechanical properties of Al 6061TiB2 in situ
composites. Mater Sci Eng A2011;528:412532.
[10] Dinaharan I, Murugan N, Parameswaran S. Influence of in
situ formed ZrB 2particles on microstructure and mechanical
properties of AA6061 metalmatrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A
2011;528:573340.
[11] Birol Y. In situ synthesis of AlTiCp composites by reacting
K2TiF6 andparticulate graphite in molten aluminium. J Alloys Compd
2008;454:1107.
[12] Sannino AP, Rack HJ. Dry sliding wear of discontinuously
reinforced aluminumcomposites: review and discussion. Wear
1995;189:119.
[13] Ma T, Yamaura H, Koss DA, Voigt RC. Dry sliding wear
behavior of cast SiC-reinforced Al MMCs. Mater Sci Eng A
2003;360:11625 .
[14] Bauri R, Surappa MK. Sliding wear behavior of AlLiSiCp
composites. Wear
2008;265:175666.[15] Jha N, Badkul A, Mondal DP, Das S, Singh M.
Sliding wear behaviour ofaluminum syntactic foam: a comparison with
Al10 wt.%SiC composites.Tribol Int 2011;44:22031.
[16] Tyagi R. Synthesis and tribological characterization of in
situ cast AlTiCcomposites. Wear 2005;259:56976.
[17] Kumar S, Sarma VS, Murty BS. Influence of in situ formed
TiB2particles on theabrasive wear behaviour of Al4Cu alloy. Mater
Sci Eng A 2007;465:1604.
[18] Mandal A, Murty BS, Chakraborty M. Wear behaviour of near
eutectic AlSialloy reinforced with in situ TiB2 particles. Mater
Sci Eng A 2009;506:2733.
[19] Venkataraman B, Sundararajan G. Correlation between the
characteristics ofthe mechanically mixed layer and wear behaviour
of aluminium, Al-7075 alloyand Al-MMCs. Wear 2000;245:2238.
[20] Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Paulo Davim J. Application
of Taguchitechniques to study dry sliding wear behaviour of metal
matrix composites.Mater Des 2007;28:13938.
[21] Mahapatra SS, Patnaik A. Study on mechanical and erosion
wear behavior ofhybrid composites using Taguchi experimental
design. Mater Des
2009;30:2791801.[22] Sahoo P. Wear behaviour of electroless NiP
coatings and optimization of
process parameters using Taguchi method. Mater Des
2009;30:13419.[23] Sahin Y. Abrasive wear behaviour of SiC/2014
aluminium composite. Tribol Int
2010;43:93943.[24] Koksal S, Ficici F, Kayikci R, Savas O.
Experimental optimization of dry sliding
wear behavior of in situ AlB2/Al composite based on Taguchis
method. MaterDes 2012;42:12430.
[25] Kennedy AR, Weston DP, Jones MI. Reaction in AlTiC metal
matrixcomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 2001;316:328.
[26] Lopez VH, Scoles A, Kennedy AR. The thermal stability of
TiC particles in anAl7 wt.%Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng A
2003;356:31625.
[27] Balamurugan GM, Duraiselvam M, Anandakrishnan V. Comparison
of hightemperature wear behaviour of plasma sprayed WCCo coated and
hardchromium plated AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater
Des2012;35:6406.
[28] Deuis RL, Subramanian C, Yellup JM. Dry sliding wear of
aluminiumcomposites a review. Compos Sci Technol 1997;57:41535
.
[29] Liu Y, Han Z, Cong H. Effects of sliding velocity and
normal load on thetribological behavior of a nanocrystalline Al
based composite. Wear2010;268:97683.
[30] Zhu HG, Ai YL, Min J, Wu Q, Wang HZ. Dry sliding wear
behavior of Al-basedcomposites fabricated by exothermic dispersion
reaction in an AlZrO2Csystem. Wear 2010;268:146571.
192 S. Baskaran et al. / Materials and Design 60 (2014)
184192