Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.

Accountability Reporting for the

Community Colleges,2012 Report

Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning Committee

October 2, 2012

David Torres, DeanInstitutional Research

Background Accountability Reporting for the

Community Colleges (or ARCC) is a set of performance indicators for the California Community Colleges (CCC)

The final report was published in March 2012

Two level of analysis: system wide performance individual college performance

student progress and achievementpre-collegiate improvement

Moreno Valley and Norco “Please note that two recently

accredited colleges have been included in the ARCC 2012 report: Moreno Valley College and Norco College.”

“This college level section includes data for each of the colleges in the system at the time of this report, although data for some earlier time periods may be missing for the newer colleges.”

2012 ARCC Report Timeline

Oct 17:Formal

data review period begins

Dec 2:Formal

data review period ends

Feb 7:2nd

Draft with

college profile,summary and peer

groups released for

institu-tional respon

se writing

Mar 9:Institu-tional respon

se due at

CCCCO

Mar 30:

Final 2011 ARCC Report release

d

Mar 15:

Deadline to

present

findings

to Board

of Truste

es

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR-DEC JAN-FEB MAR2011 2012 2013

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Student Progress and Achievement Rate

Percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and within six years:

• transferred to a four-year college or • earned an AA/AS or • earned a Certificate (18 units or more) or • achieved "Transfer Directed" status or • achieved "Transfer Prepared" status

2003 2004 20050

102030405060708090

100

46.7 48.3 46.4

When will Moreno Valley and Norco colleges have complete outcomes available? Example: SPARS (6-year window)ARCC               MVC / NC                

Report Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 20182012 S     Year 1     E    2012 S     Year 2     E  2012     S     Year 3     E              2013 S     Year 1     E  2013 S     Year 2     E  2013       S     Year 3     E            2014 S     Year 1     E  2014 S     Year 2     E  2014         S     Year 3     E          2015 S     Year 1     E  2015 S     Year 2     E  2015           S     Year 3     E        2016 S     Year 1     E  2016 S     Year 2     E  2016             S     Year 3     E      2017 S     Year 1     E  2017 S     Year 2     E  2017               S     Year 3     E    2018 S     Year 1     E  2018 ` S     Year 2     E  2018                 S     Year 3     E  2019 S     Year 1     E  2019   S     Year 2     E  2019                   S     Year 3     E

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Percent of Students Who Earned at Least 30 Units

Percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and within six years:

• earned at least 30 units • while in the California Community College

System

2003 2004 20050

102030405060708090

100

71.0 71.7 70.8

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Term to Term Persistence Rate

Percentage of first-time students with:

• a minimum of six units earned in a Fall term, and

• returned and enrolled in the subsequent Fall term

• anywhere in the system.

2007 2008 20090

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

66.7 68.8 70.8

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Annual Successful Course Completion Rate

for Credit Vocational Courses

Percentage of student enrollments:• in credit-based classes and • courses coded as “Clearly / Adv.

Occupational” or higher• where students earned an A, B, C or CR grade

2008 2009 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 0

87.2

0 0

70.375.8 75.3

69.2

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Annual Successful Course Completion Rate

for Credit Basic Skills Courses

Percentage of student enrollments:• in credit-based classes and • courses coded as “Basic Skills”• where students earned an A, B, C or CR grade

2008 2009 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 0

64.7

0 0

64.363.6 64.2 62.3

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Improvement Rates for ESL Courses

Percentage of students who:• successfully completed the initial ESL course and • successfully completed a higher-level course in the

same discipline • within three academic years

2006 2007 20080

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

45.2 48.8 51.2

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Improvement Rates for Credit Basic Skills Courses

Percentage of students who:• successfully completed the initial basic skills course

and • successfully completed a higher-level course in the

same discipline • within three academic years

2006 2007 20080

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

63.0 62.9 61.9

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Annual Headcount

Data Sources:Annual Unduplicated Headcount: Chancellor’s Office Management Information System (COMIS)

Full-Time Equivalent Students (FTES): Chancellor’s Office, Fiscal Services 320 Report.

2008-09 2009-10 2010-110

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

58,827 55,972

29,771

1838814942

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Annual FTES

Data Sources:Annual Unduplicated Headcount: Chancellor’s Office Management Information System (COMIS)

Full-Time Equivalent Students (FTES): Chancellor’s Office, Fiscal Services 320 Report.

2008-09 FTES 2009-10 FTES 2010-11 FTES0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

30,969 31,185

15,566

68296754

MOV NOR RCC(D)

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Student Age (in percentages)

M 08-09

M 09-10

M 10-11

N 08-09 N 09-10 N 10-11 R 08-09 R 09-10 R 10-110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.2240.333 0.294 0.303 0.303

0.293

0.365

0.296 0.3150.367

0.434

0.278

0.331 0.3090.277

0.048 0.0240.079 0.073 0.054

19 or less 20 - 24 25 - 49 Over 49

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Student Gender* (in percentages)

*Students reporting gender as “Unknown” are not included.

M 08-09

M 09-10

M 10-11

N 08-09

N 09-10

N 10-11

R 08-09

R 09-10

R 10-11

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.4870.548 0.549 0.552 0.566

0.5080.446 0.442 0.441 0.428

Female Male

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Student Ethnicity (in percentages)

M 08-09

M 09-10

M 10-11

N 08-09

N 09-10

N 10-11

R 08-09

R 09-10

R 10-11

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

- -

30.4

- -

30.0 32.3 30.2 27.9

- -

12.9

- -

7.2 11.1 10.7 10.3

- -

42.7

- -

45.3 36.7 39.5 44.1

- -

6.7

- -

9.2 8.7 8.2 8.6

- -

6.9

- -

7.8 10.4 10.9 8.6

White African American HispanicAsian/Filipino/PacIsl Native Am/Alaska Native Other

The Chancellor’s Office created “peer group colleges” in an attempt to “level the playing field”.

For every college-level indicator, there are external factors beyond the control of the college that affect its performance on that indicator.

Colleges were grouped as “peers” based on the statistical magnitude that these external factors had on each college-level indicator.

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:Peer Grouping

Transfer rates are affected by external factors: level of academic preparedness of

student body distance to nearest UC/CSU income levels of service areas percentage of older students served

Colleges with similar levels on all these factors and would be classified together as “peers”.

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Peer Grouping: Transfer Example

Peer grouping was statistically derived does not necessarily reflect any traditional,

intuitive grouping method

Since each indicator is affected by different external factors, each college is assigned to different peer groups for each indicator RCCD has no single peer college for each

indicator

Peer grouping is intended to provide a more equitable context for interpreting college performance College to college comparisons are not

encouraged

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Peer Grouping: Issues to Consider

RCCD’s College Level Indicators:

Peer Grouping: Summary

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RCC(D) PG AVG PG LOW PG HIGH

Basic Skills Im-

provement Rate

Basic Skills

Course Success

Rate

Voca-tional

Course Success

Rate

Persis-tence to Next Fall

Earned 30+ Units

ESL Im-provement

Rate

Student Progress & Achieveme

nt

Sharing the draft ARCC findings various district and college groups

Institutional Response Inform and encourage feedback Each college created their own

response

ARCC: Institutional Response

On each of the seven ARCC performance measures, RCCD has either maintained or increased its score for the most recent three cohorts of data.

ARCC: In 25 Words or Less…

End of slide show

Accountability Reporting for the

Community Colleges,2012 Report