Top Banner
Accountability Information August 2009
23

Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Jan 20, 2015

Download

Documents

emengist

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Accountability Information

August 2009

Page 2: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Where Do We Go From Here?

New 2010 Standards!!!

Other Hurdles???–TAKS Accommodated –Vertical Scales for Reading and Math

What is TPM???

What are Vertical Scales???

Page 3: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

2010Accountability Ratings

Rating Reading/ELA

Writing

Social Studies

Mathematics Science

Exemplary 90% 90% 90%

Recognized 80% 80% 80%

Acceptable 70% 60% 55%

Page 4: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

2010 AYP Accountability Ratings

• Includes: TAKS, TAKS A, TAKS Mod, TAKS Alt

• Subgroups: All, Af. Am., Hispanic, White, Eco. Dis., Sp. Ed., LEP

Rating Reading/ELA Mathematics

MET 73% 67%

Page 5: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Other Hurdles to Clear

• TAKS Accommodated will be summed with TAKS in all grade levels and all content areas

• More challenging Vertical Scales put in place for Reading and Math

Page 6: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Vertical Scales

A Measurement of Progress!

Page 7: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

What Do Vertical Scales Measure?

• The location of a student on a continuum that covers 3rd through 8th grade standards for reading and math

• A student’s progress from year to year

• An approximate measurement of growth

Page 8: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Old Horizontal Scale vs.

New Vertical Scale• Old Scale

– Range 1200-3300 for each grade

– Cannot subtract scores across grades to evaluate progress

– Cut scores for performance levels

• 2100 Met Standard

• 2400 Commended Performance

• New Scale– Range 0-1000 across grades

3-8

– Can subtract scores across grades to evaluate progress

– Cut scores for performance levels

GradeMet

StandardCommended Performance

3 500 640

4 554 698

5 603 738

6 637 783

7 670 823

8 700 850

Page 9: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Which Grades, Languages, Subjects, Tests Will Have Vertical Scales?

• Grades 3-8• English and Spanish language tests• Reading and Math• TAKS, TAKS-A, TAKS-LAT, and (eventually)

TELPAS• The tests that will not have vertical scales at this

point are:– Any high school tests– TAKS-M (may come later) and TAKS-Alt at all levels– Any writing, science, or social studies tests

Page 10: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Which Vertical Scales Will be Comparable, Which Won’t?

• TAKS and TAKS-A in English are comparable

• TAKS and TAKS-A in Spanish are comparable

• TELPAS will be a separate scale

• None of the three categories above can be directly compared with any of the others

Page 11: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

What Will Vertical Scales Look Like?

• The scale is from 0 to approximately 1,000 for 3rd through 8th grade

• Scale scores for English language tests will be identified with an ‘E’ proceeding the number and Spanish with an ‘S’

• Examples: E-489, E-980, S-540

Page 12: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

What Changes WillVertical Scales Bring?

• Starting next year, they will replace horizontal measures

• Will include adjustments to “cut scores” (met standard and commended levels – see next slide)

Page 13: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

What Will Be Reported This Year?

• Same basic reporting information as past years– Old scale with 2100 as Met Standard and 2400

as Commended Performance– Same graph on Confidential Student Report

• New Information – Reading and mathematics

• English grades 3-8; Spanish grades 3-6

– Vertical scores reported near Lexile/Quantile scores

Page 14: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Cam

pus

ID

Curr

ent G

rade

Lev

el

Last

Nam

e

Firs

t Nam

e

Stud

ent I

D

Stan

ford

Or A

pren

da

Subj

ect

Stan

ford

Or A

pren

da G

rade

Lev

el

Stan

ford

Or A

pren

da N

CE

Cour

se

Fina

l Gra

de

Cour

se 2

Fina

l Gra

de 2

TAKS

_Dat

e

TAKS

Gra

de L

evel

Scor

eCod

e

Test

_Ver

sion

Lang

uage

Met

Std

Com

men

d

Scal

e

Verti

cal S

cale

Raw

101912268 4 Alvarez Luis 1355147 Aprenda Math 03 93.3 Spanish Mathematics 94 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2571 744 39101912268 4 Arevalo J eniffer 1428219 Aprenda Math 03 81.1 Spanish Mathematics 90 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2571 744 39101912268 4 Balleza J asmin 1394668 Aprenda Math 03 81.1 Spanish Mathematics 96 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2400 649 37101912268 4 Becerra J uan 1585035 Stanford Math 03 61 Mathematics 93 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y Y 2544 707 39101912268 4 Calderon Gabriel 1355202 Aprenda Math 03 70.1 Spanish Mathematics 80 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2268 575 34101912268 4 Camacho Stefany 1375020 Aprenda Math 03 81.1 Spanish Mathematics 96 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2461 683 38101912268 4 Carrasco Esbeidy 1514477 Stanford Math 03 42.5 Mathematics 88 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y N 2149 523 30101912268 4 Castillo Olga 1309034 Aprenda Math 03 65.6 Spanish Mathematics 90 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2237 558 33101912268 4 Cazares Fabiola 1391760 Aprenda Math 03 58.1 Spanish Mathematics 82 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2237 558 33101912268 4 Cuchillo Karla 1530782 Aprenda Math 03 99 Spanish Mathematics 99 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2721 828 40101912268 4 Del Rio Lisbeth 1355374 Aprenda Math 03 54.3 Spanish Mathematics 92 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2237 558 33101912268 4 Delgado Hernan 1349413 Aprenda Math 03 99 Spanish Mathematics 89 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2721 828 40101912268 4 Escobar Elizabeth 1352656 Stanford Math 03 58.1 Mathematics 90 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y Y 2436 656 38101912268 4 Escoto Sebastian 1355132 Stanford Math 03 75.8 Mathematics 97 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y Y 2400 640 37101912268 4 Estrada Andrea 1355306 Aprenda Math 03 82.7 Spanish Mathematics 97 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2303 595 35101912268 4 Euceda Oscar 1357523 Aprenda Math 03 34.4 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2115 490 28101912268 4 Garcia Brianna 1353202 Stanford Math 03 78.2 Mathematics 96 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y Y 2400 640 37101912268 4 Garcia J ose 1355335 Aprenda Math 03 73.7 Spanish Mathematics 92 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2303 595 35101912268 4 Garcia Kevin 1353346 Aprenda Math 03 70.1 Spanish Mathematics 90 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2159 515 30101912268 4 Gutierrez Brian 1355116 Aprenda Math 03 93.3 Spanish Mathematics 96 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2303 595 35101912268 4 Gutierrez J onathan 1355106 Aprenda Math 03 68.5 Spanish Mathematics 88 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y N 2159 515 30101912268 4 Hernandez David 1375012 Aprenda Math 03 93.3 Spanish Mathematics 96 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS S Y Y 2400 649 37101912268 4 Hernandez Marisa 1353212 Stanford Math 03 62.3 Mathematics 94 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y Y 2544 707 39101912268 4 J ones Padilla Derrick 1328832 Stanford Math 03 29.1 Mathematics 87 2009-04 3 S_Score TAKS E Y N 2100 500 27

Page 15: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Performance Standards on Vertical Scales

• Indicated cut scores will have more challenging standards starting in 2010

• English TAKS

GRADE

Reading Mathematics

Number of questions needed Number of questions needed

Met Standard Commended Met Standard Commended

3rd 24 34 27 37

4th 28 38 28 39

5th 29 39 30 40 + 1

6th 27 + 3 38 + 1 29 41 + 1

7th 34 45 28 44

8th 34 + 3 or 4 45 + 1 30 45 + 1

Page 16: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Performance Standards on Vertical Scales

• Indicated cut scores will have more challenging standards starting in 2010

• Spanish TAKS

GRADE

Reading MathematicsNumber of questions needed Number of questions needed

Met Standard Commended Met Standard Commended

3rd 23 33 27 + 2 37

4th 25 36 27 + 3 37 + 1

5th 27 37 30 39

6th 25 + 3 36 + 2 29 + 4 40 + 2

Page 17: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

How Do I Work With Vertical Scales?An Example

Student A is in 5th grade and recently took the reading TAKS

• She scored a 2212 scale score this year

• Last year she scored a scale score of 2100.

Page 18: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

How Do I Work With Vertical Scales?An Example - Continued

Actual Expected

2009 Scale Score

2212 2100

2008 Scale Score

2100

2009 Vertical Scale Score

674 620

2008 Vertical Scale Score

554

Growth 120 66

Page 19: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

What is the Texas Projection Measure (TPM)?

• An estimate of whether a student is likely to pass the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) tests at a future grade

• TPM is based on (1) a student’s current performance on TAKS and (2) the TAKS scores from all students at the campus that a student attends.

Page 20: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

TPM Predictors

• Uses three predictors for reading and mathematics projections– students’ current year scale score in reading– students’ current year scale score in mathematics– average campus scale score in projection subject

(i.e., reading for reading and mathematics for mathematics)

• For science, social studies, and writing, add student scale score for that subject, for a total of four predictors

Page 21: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

Spring 2009 TPM

For reading/ELA and math• Grades 3 and 4 to 5

• Grades 5, 6, and 7 to 8

• Grades 8, 9 and 10 to 11

For science• Grade 5 to 8

• Grade 8 to 11 (2010)

• Grade 10 to 11

For social studies• Grades 8 and 10 to 11

For writing• Grade 4 to 7

• On Confidential Student Report– Indicator (yes/no) about

whether student projected to meet the standard in the next high stakes grade

– “Texas Projection Measure—Projected to Meet Standard at Grade XX: YES”

Page 22: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

2009 Impact on AYP* and TEA*

Adequate Yearly Progress 2009• Students who do not meet the standard in reading or

math will be included in the numerator (# of students passing) if their TPM indicates that they are likely to pass at the targeted grade.

TEA Accountability 2009 (pending final approval by the Commissioner)

• The TPM will be added to Required Improvement and exceptions to allow a school to improve on rating level above the rating level of the actual scores.

*For SSI contents/grades, the TPM for the first two administrations will be included with the highest score for each individual student being selected.

Page 23: Accountability 2009 Revised Numeracy Coaches

How do the TPM and Vertical Scale Differ?

• Vertical scale allows an evaluation of past progress

• TPM projects to future• TPM not limited to grades and subjects

with a vertical scale• More comprehensive information

1. Current status2. Vertical scale score changes3. Projection