Top Banner
Accessing FR M t Management Daniel Geisseler, W Department of Land, Air University of C University of C REP Nutrient tI f ti t Information William R. Horwath r and Water Resources, alifornia, Davis alifornia, Davis
22

Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Mar 14, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Accessing FRM tManagement

Daniel Geisseler, W

Department of Land, AirUniversity of CUniversity of C

REP Nutrient t I f tit Information

William R. Horwath

r and Water Resources, alifornia, Davisalifornia, Davis

Page 2: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

• Objectives• Accessing FREP data:

• Past: Full reports• Past: Full reports• Present: Searchable dat• Future additions: Fertiliz

crops• Summary

Content

tabaseation guidelines for major

Page 3: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Proj

M k h d t d fMake research data and ffunded projects readily av

d i th hcrop advisors through a udatabase.

Develop a database to Develop a database to Enter key information f

including a summary ofincluding a summary ofthe major findings into

Research additional da

ject objectives

fi di f FREPfindings from FREP-vailable to growers and

f i dl b b duser-friendly, web-based,

gether with CDFA ITgether with CDFA IT.from technical reports, f the methods used andf the methods used and the database.

ata for each report.

Page 4: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Previous preAccess thAccess th

sentation of FREP data: hrough homepagehrough homepage

Page 5: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Previous preList of coList of co

sentation of FREP data: ompleted projectsompleted projects

Page 6: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Previous preFiFi

sentation of FREP data: inal reportsinal reports

40 Pages

Page 7: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheAccess tAccess t

e new database:through homepagethrough homepage

Page 8: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheSeSe

e new database:earch optionsearch options

Page 9: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheSeSe

Keyword(s)

Type of CropType of Crop

County

Date Range

e new database:earch optionsearch options

Page 10: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheSeSe

e new database:earch optionsearch options

Page 11: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheLevel 1: LLevel 1: L

e new database:List of FREP reportsList of FREP reports

Page 12: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheLevel 2:Level 2:

Can We Predict K Fixation in the San Joaquin Valley from

Pettygrove G.S., and Southard R.J., Department of Land, Air

Highlights• Soils formed in Sierra Nevadan alluvium tend to fix K.• Samples with exchangeable K levels of 50 ppm or less alw• Samples with exchangeable K levels of 50 ppm or less alw

samples with >200 ppm exchangeable K did not fix K.• Soils formed in Coastal Range alluvium do not fix K.

IntroductionIntroductionVermiculite is the soil mineral present in San Joaquin Valley sresponsible for making potassium (K) unavailable or less avaplant during flowering and boll fill. In spite of much research tto field symptoms and to develop diagnostic criteria, no one location of K fixing soilslocation of K-fixing soils.The objective of this research was to use information from disoil survey databases to map the location of soils in the San production areas that potentially possess a high capacity to finterlayers.

Methods/ managementThe study covered the cotton production areas of Fresno, KiValley.

y

e new database:Report summariesReport summaries

m Soil Texture and Mineralogy?

r and Water Resources, University of California, Davis

CropCotton

CountyFresno, Kings, Tulare, and Kernways fixed K while Fresno, Kings, Tulare, and Kern

Years of study1997-1999

Fertilization guidelines

ways fixed K, while

g- Cotton

FREP ArticleFinal Report

soils that is ailable to the cotton to relate this problem has described the

FREP Proceedings 2001: Page 75

FREP Proceedings 2002: Page 61

FREP Proceedings 2003: Page 107

gitized USDA country Joaquin Valley cotton

fix K in mineral

ngs, Tulare, and Kern counties in the southern San Joaquin

External links:Pettygrove et al. 2011: Better crops

Page 13: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

TheLevelLevel

e new database:3: Final reports3: Final reports

Page 14: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

The nAccessing feAccessing fe

Can We Predict K Fixation in the San Joaquin Valley from

Pettygrove GS, Southard RJ, Department of Land, Air and W

Highlights• Soils formed in Sierra Nevadan alluvium tend to fix K.• Samples with exchangeable K levels of 50 ppm or less alw• Samples with exchangeable K levels of 50 ppm or less alw

samples with >200 ppm exchangeable K did not fix K.• Soils formed in Coastal Range alluvium do not fix K.

IntroductionIntroductionVermiculite is the soil mineral present in San Joaquin Valley sresponsible for making potassium (K) unavailable or less avaplant during flowering and boll fill. In spite of much research tto field symptoms and to develop diagnostic criteria, no one location of K fixing soilslocation of K-fixing soils.The objective of this research was to use information from disoil survey databases to map the location of soils in the San production areas that potentially possess a high capacity to finterlayers.y

Methods/ managementThe study covered the cotton production areas of Fresno, Kicounties in the southern San Joaquin Valley.

new database: ertilization guidelinesertilization guidelines

m Soil Texture and Mineralogy?

Water Resources, University of California, Davis

CropCotton

CountyFresno, Kings, Tulare, and Kernways fixed K while , g , ,

Years of study1997-1999

Fertilization guidelines

ways fixed K, while

- Cotton

FREP ArticleFinal Report

FREP P di 2001 P 75

soils that is ailable to the cotton to relate this problem has described the

FREP Proceedings 2001: Page 75

FREP Proceedings 2002: Page 61

FREP Proceedings 2003: Page 107

gitized USDA country Joaquin Valley cotton

fix K in mineral

External links:Pettygrove et al. 2011: Better crops

ngs, Tulare, and Kern

Page 15: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Cotton Fertilization Guidelines

Preplant SowingSeed

establisSoil test

i

P t i (K O)

Nitrogen (N)Pre-plant N Starter N

Soil test

Soil testi

i i

i

Potassium (K2O)Pre-plant K Starter K

ii i

List of references i

dling shment

First white bloom

Firstsquare

Peak bloom

First open boll

Petiole analysisi i

Sidedress N Foliar N

Petiole analysis

Petiole analysisi i

i

i

i

Sidedress K Foliar K ii

Links:• University of California Cotton Production Information

National Cotton Council of America• National Cotton Council of America

• The Cotton Pickin’ Web

• California Cotton Ginners and Growers Associations (CCGGA)

Page 16: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Cotton Fertilization Guidelines

Sidedress Nitrogen i

Preplant SowingSeed

establisSoil test

i N requirement of cotton strongly depends on the yield level. The N fertilization rates for different cotton yield levels grown in soils with nitrate-N levels below 50 lbs/acre are listed below [43]. Approaches to determine a realistic yield goal are discussed here.

Application Rate

P t i (K O)

Nitrogen (N)Pre-plant N Starter N

Soil test

Soil testi

i i

i

Potassium (K2O)Pre-plant K Starter K

ii i

Adapted from [43].

Another factor that needs to be taken into account is the type of cotton grown. In general, N application rates to Pima cotton arecotton grown. In general, N application rates to Pima cotton are lower compared to Acala cotton due to slightly lower yields and the sensitivity of Pima cotton to excess N [37]. A 2-year study in the San Joaquin Valley found no increase in Pima cotton yield when the available N (residual soil nitrate-N plus fertilizer N) exceeded 150 lbs/acre [4, 15].

The optimal fertilizer rate also depends on the fertilizer application costs relative to the price of cotton that can be realizedapplication costs relative to the price of cotton that can be realized. The maximum yield is generally not the most profitable yield, as the yield increase diminishes with each additional pound of N added. Therefore, the economically optimal yield may be considerably below the maximum yield.

Mode of Application i

Fertilizer Type

Time of Application

i

i

dling shment

First white bloom

Firstsquare

Peak bloom

First open boll

Petiole analysisi i

Sidedress N Foliar N

Petiole analysis

Petiole analysisi i

i

i

i

Sidedress K Foliar K ii

Page 17: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Cotton Fertilization Guidelines

Preplant SowingSeed

establisSoil test

i

P t i (K O)

Nitrogen (N)Pre-plant N Starter N

Soil test

Soil testi

i i

i

Potassium (K2O)Pre-plant K Starter K

ii i

dling shment

First white bloom

Firstsquare

Peak bloom

First open boll

Petiole analysisi i

Nitrogen deficiency results in pale green leaves (see picture). The symptoms first appear on the older leaves. In addition, growth of the plant is stunted and the development of vegetative branches

Nitrogen Deficiency Symptoms

Sidedress N Foliar N

Petiole analysis

Petiole analysisi i

i

i

i

reduced. Bolls may be shed soon after flowering. When N deficiency occurs later in the season, leafs may turn purple, and bolls at late fruiting positions may be shed [43].

Sidedress K Foliar K ii

A healthy (left) and a nitrogen deficient cotton leaf (right; photo provided by the International Plant Nutrition Institute; www.ipni.net).

While insufficient N reduces crop growth and lint yield, excessive N can cause difficulties in defoliation, harvest, and may reduce lint yield [22]. Furthermore, high N application rates may increase aphid populations. In a FREP-funded study carried out in the San Joaquin Valley, Godfrey and Hutmacher found that cotton aphid infestationsValley, Godfrey and Hutmacher found that cotton aphid infestations were more severe with 200 lbs N/acre than with lower N application rates [1]. Aphid levels were especially high in plots where high N rates and the pyrethroid insecticide Capture (to control lygus bug populations) were applied.

Page 18: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Cotton Fertilization Guidelines

Preplant SowingSeed

establisSoil test

i

P t i (K O)

Nitrogen (N)Pre-plant N Starter N

Soil test

Soil testi

i i

i

Potassium (K2O)Pre-plant K Starter K

ii i

dling shment

First white bloom

Firstsquare

Peak bloom

First open boll

Petiole analysisi i

Sidedress N Foliar N

Petiole analysis

Petiole analysisi i

i

i

i

Sidedress K Foliar K ii

Soil Nitrate Test

Soil samples for nitrate analysis should be taken near planting time or at least 3 weeks after the last N application [43]. As cotton is a deep rooting crop, samples should be taken to a depth of at least two feet. The distribution of nitrate in the soil profile is very variable. For this reason, the estimation of the potentially available N is improved by taking samples deeper than 2 feet [2]. The Cotton Production Manual recommends taking samples from the top 3 feetProduction Manual recommends taking samples from the top 3 feet of soil [43]. Due to the variability of nitrate in the soil, care must be taken that the sample is representative for the field (see Sampling for Soil Nitrate Determination).

The soil nitrate test measures the plant available N at the time of sampling. Its level depends on a number of factors (see Factors Affecting Soil Nitrate Concentrations in Spring). Therefore, the test result is field specific and needs to be determined every yearresult is field specific and needs to be determined every year.

In a study with FREP support carried out in the San Joaquin Valley between 1996 and 2000, Hutmacher and collaborators found that the residual nitrate–N level in spring can be fully subtracted from the crop N requirements to determine the amount of fertilizer N that needs to be applied [2].

Page 19: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Additioonal information

Page 20: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Cotton Fertilization Guidelines

Preplant SowingSeed

establisSoil test

i

P t i (K O)

Nitrogen (N)Pre-plant N Starter N

Soil test

Soil testi

i i

i

Potassium (K2O)Pre-plant K Starter K

ii i

List of references i

dling shment

First white bloom

Firstsquare

Peak bloom

First open boll

Petiole analysisi i

Sidedress N Foliar N

Petiole analysis

Petiole analysisi i

i

i

i

Sidedress K Foliar K ii

Links:• University of California Cotton Production Information

National Cotton Council of America• National Cotton Council of America

• The Cotton Pickin’ Web

• California Cotton Ginners and Growers Associations (CCGGA)

Page 21: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

D t f l t d• Data from completed printo database

• The database is accesswww cdfa cawww.cdfa.ca

• Fertilization guidelines fwritten

• Guidelines and databaseach othereach other

Summary

j t h b t drojects has been entered

sible online:a gov/is/frep/a.gov/is/frep/

for major crops are being

se will be linked with

Page 22: Accessing FREP Nutrient MtManagement tI f ti Information

Ackn

• FREPA if M• Asif Maan

• Amrith Gunasekara• FREP team

f C• Hence Philipps from CD

nowledgements

DFA-IT