Academic Librarianship: Developing a Research Program For Tenure and Beyond Deborah V. Dolan, M.A., M.L.S. Assistant Professor, Social Sciences Librarian Joan and Donald E. Axinn Library Hofstra University Hempstead, NY 11549 [email protected]November 16, 2006
35
Embed
Academic Librarianship: Developing a Research Program For Tenure and Beyond Deborah V. Dolan, M.A., M.L.S. Assistant Professor, Social Sciences Librarian.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Academic Librarianship:Developing a Research Program
For Tenure and Beyond
Deborah V. Dolan, M.A., M.L.S.Assistant Professor, Social Sciences LibrarianJoan and Donald E. Axinn LibraryHofstra UniversityHempstead, NY [email protected] 16, 2006
• Overt behavior (users, library faculty, other faculty, administrators)
• Thought Processes and Concepts (classification, organization, and presentation of materials)
If librarianship is a social science, research in librarianship is subject to practice of the
scientific method
• What is research?– Planned, systematic collection, analysis, and
interpretation of data
• Goals of research– Go beyond experience and common sense (i.e.,
opinion)– Test myths, rules-of-thumb, and convention– Move from experience to empirical evidence
(observable and measurable by all)– Ultimately, to predict behavior
How do we meet goals of research?Two types of research
BASIC
1. Descriptive
2. Goal is understanding
3. Often, but not always qualitative
APPLIED (aka ‘action research’)
1. Prescriptive
2. Goal is prediction and control
3. Quantitative; if qualitative data collected, converted into quantitative scheme
Basic and Applied Research are NOT Dichotomous
Research in Mature Social Science Discipline vs. Research in Librarianship
1. Standardization of tests and methods (e.g., reliability, validity)Lack of standardized tests and methods (what exactly are we measuring? How do we know?)
2. Application of scientific method to problems in and the relationships of components of the disciplineLack of application of scientific method (e.g., development and testing of hypotheses)
3. Basic research to understand phenomena as basis of theoretical foundationLack of basic research inhibits understanding of phenomena as basis of theoretical foundation
4. Development of theoretical foundation toa. Allow generalizability
a. solve professional problems
c. Develop standardized and accepted instruments and methods for the analysis and prediction of
organizational and service behavior
Failure to develop theoretical foundation a. Idiosyncratic research, (e.g.,“how I done it good”)
b. Non-generalizable research does not solve professional problems
c. Does not allow development of standardized …
5. Body of knowledge in discipline is built incrementally, through interrelationships of concepts, methods, and measures
Concepts and research are fragmented and non-cumulative, body of knowledge is limited
Our discipline’s weaknesses are
YOUROpportunities!
Why conduct research?
Signs of Profession– Service ideal– Theoretical and empirical foundation
Universities value and revere scientific method
Understood by most ordinary administrator (support)
Increasing demands for accountability require research to inform decisions and provide service
Well-done research generates excitement, interest, enthusiasm, commitment
What is activity in the absence
of a research-based theoretical basis
and empirically-based evidence?
Educational background
of academic library faculty
does not prepare them
to be competent researchers
Conducting research requires methodological competence
Evaluating others’ research (and shortcomings of such) requires methodological competence
How do we become
competent researchers?
Learn to think like a researcher – critically
Educate yourself in research methods
Consider reading and critiquing
library research literature as part of your faculty responsibilities
How do we ‘know’ what we ‘know’?Four methods of ‘knowing’
Tenacity – Truth is true because I hold firmly to it (nothing will dislodge belief)
Authority – Truth is true because authority says so (physicist, bible, tradition, public sanction)
A priori – based on reason (logic, math proofs)
Scientific method – independent of our thoughts or opinions. Constructs, behaviors, or objects can be measured and observed by all. Alternate hypotheses are proposed and tested. Theories are not ‘proven’ or ‘dis-proven’; they are ‘supported’ or ‘not supported’ by data.
How is a body of knowledge built?Science vs. Common Sense
Ideas are constructs created by humans (defined)
Ideas are ‘real’ (e.g., sin, aggression)
Theories must be testable (refutable)
Acceptance of ideas not testable (not refutable)
Empirically/objectively collects data to support or refute theory
Systematically investigates nature of relationships
Accepts surface relationships as cause and effect
Goal of Science
Establish general theory of empirical events
which allows us to relate separate events and
explain and predict events and processes
not yet known
Where do we start?
Have an idea that construct A is related to construct B
Form a testable hypothesis (refutable)
Operationalize (how and what will be measured)
Observe/measure
Test (statistical analysis)
Conclusion
Propose alternate explanations of results (for later testing)
Ok, I have my own academic library
experience, I’ve read the literature, and I’ve formed a testable
hypothesis. I’m now on the hunt for good measures of my
constructs
Good Luck!!!
No, really,
the lack of good
measures in librarianshipIs your good fortune
What makes a measure ‘good’?
Reliability
Validity
Reliability – accuracy of measurement (quantitative)
• Test-retest – are test results consistent over time when ‘reality’ is consistent
• Inter-rater – do raters rate the same item, observation, etc. in the same way
• Internal consistency – items which are measuring the same component of construct should correlate more highly with each other than with items that are measuring different areas of construct
Validity – are we measuring what we think we are measuring (qualitative question)
• Content – measure reflects full content of what one is measuring
• Academic status• Workload• Research time• Tests and measures• Position advertisements comparison• Media portrayal of profession• University portrayal of profession
Collection Development Examples
• Core List comparisons• Circulation policies• Interlibrary loan• User satisfaction• Electronic and print collections• Journal collections