Top Banner
30

About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

Jun 05, 2018

Download

Documents

vudang
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most
Page 2: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

AboutTheNewKingJamesVersionDr.PeterS.Ruckman

B.A.,B.D.,M.A.,Th.M.,Ph.D.

PresidentandFounderofPensacolaBibleInstitute

Page 3: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

Copyright©1983byPeterS.Ruckman

Allrightsreserved(PRINT)ISBN1-58026-200-7

BBBOOKSTORE

P.O.Box7135Pensacola,FL32534

PUBLISHER’SNOTE

TheScripturequotationsfoundhereinarefromthetextoftheAuthorizedKingJamesVersionoftheBible.Anydeviationstherefromarenotintentional.

Page 4: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

TableofContents1.WhyNoHonestChristianEverRecommendstheNew“KingJames”Version

2.TheLastActinTheAlexandrianDrama,partI

3.TheLastActinTheAlexandrianDrama,partII

4.TheLastActinTheAlexandrianDrama,partIII

5.TheNew“KingJames”ASVofThomasNelson

6.TheBottomLineontheSo-CalledNew“KJV”

7.ACritiqueoftheNew“KingJames”Bible

8.TheCreedoftheAlexandrianCult

Page 5: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

1.WhyNoHonestChristianEverRecommendstheNew“KingJames”Version

ThefollowingtractusiswrittentoexposethemostsubtleandcraftypieceofdeceptioncarriedoutbytheAlexandrianCultsincethepublicationoftheNewAmericanStandardVersion(1960).

IfthereaderwillopenhisAuthorizedVersion—anyeditionprintedatanytimebyanyone—andcheckitwiththereferencesgiveninthisfilehewilldiscoverastartlingandgrislytruth:theso-called“NewKJV”istheRSVoftheNationalCouncilofChurchesreinstatedwithreadingsfromtheNewASV(andoldASVof1901)bymixingbothoftheminwiththereadingsoftheAuthorizedVersion.Thereaderwillobservefurtherthattheonlyreal“demand”forthisnewversionwasthedesireofabookpublishingcompanytosellBibleversions,aftertwooftheir“versions”refusedtosell:theASVof1901andtheRSVof1952.

Thesinnerswho“gottogether”topawnoffthisfakeKJVrepresenteveryshadeofapostateConservatismandEvangelicalisminAmerica,includingNeo-EvangelicalsupportersofBillyGraham(HaroldOckenga),Charismatichealers(ThomasZimmerman),SouthernBaptists(AdrianRogers),deadorthodoxapostates(HaroldLindsell),five-pointCalvinisticbabysprinklers(ArthurSteltzer),andBaptistBible“Fellowshippers”(A.V.Henderson).TheNewTestamentCommitteeactuallyhadthesupportofBoyceBlackwelder,whotaughtthattheFIREofMatthew3:11wastheHolySpiritandthateveryChristianinthisagecouldlosehissalvationandgotohell(seedocumentedevidence)[inProblemTexts,1980]takendirectlyfromBlackwelder’swork).

WemaythankGodthatthreemeninAmericahadbettersensethantoassociatethemselveswiththisecumenicalmagpie’snest;thosethreemenwereLesterRoloff,BobGrayandJackHyles.BobJones,Jr.,andBobJones,III,hadalreadyalignedthemselveswithacrewevenmorecorruptthanthiscrew,theywouldn’tcount.In1982BobJones,III,splitalocalchurchinLosAngelesrightdownthemiddlebytellingtheyoungpeoplefromthatchurchthattheyhadtotakesidesagainsttheirownpastorontheissueofTextualCriticismandadopttheviewsofStewartCuster—oneoftheirownfacultymembers—whohasaboutasmuchintegrityandspiritualinsightasyoucouldputinthelefteyeofablindmosquito.BobJones,Jr.andIII,insistedthatthemembersofthislocalBaptistchurchtaketheBJUviewofWestcottandHortagainsttheBible-believingviewoftheirownpastor.

AlthoughthefacultymembersatTennesseeTempleandFalwell’sschoolinLynchburghavenotyetgonethisfaroverboardintheireffortstocontrolthelocalchurches,theyare“ontheway”withthisNew“KingJames”Bible.In1982EdHindsonandEdDobson,twoofthegreatestBible-rejecting“Fundamentalists”intheUSA,wereinvitedintoadozenChristiancollegesandseminariestolectureonthesuperiorityofThomasNelson’slatestpublicationtotheAVof1611.

ToreinforcethisSatanicpropaganda,anumberof“original”1611versionswerereproducedwiththemotiveinmindbeingthatwhentheChristianyoungpeoplein

Page 6: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

AmericasawthattheAVtheyhadbeenusing(theonetheirfathersandgrandfathersandgreat-grandfathershadbeenusing:Moody,Finney,Sunday,SamJones,WilliamBooth,JohnWesley,PeterCartwright,EarnestReveal,GypsySmith,Dr.DeHaan,CharlesSpurgeon,JonathanEdwards,MelTrotter,etc.)didnotexactlymatchtheoriginalAVeditiontheywouldbeseducedintoacceptingacombinationRSV-KJV-ASVthatdidn’tmatchiteither!BobJonesUniversity(againtakingtheleadintheLaodiceanapostasy)sentoutacoloredpamphletontheAVshowingonlyONEPAGEOFTHEORIGINALedition;onthatonepagewastheApocryphaheading.ThiswasdesignedtomaketheChristiansthinkthattheAVhadincludedtheApocryphaaspartoftheScriptures.

Now,inthisfile,weexposethedesperatetacticsoftheseprofessionalliarswhoselifelongministriesarededicatedtousurpingtheauthorityoftheHolySpiritandwhoselifelonglaborsareaimedatcreatingthemaximumamountofUNBELIEFinabsoluteauthority.

NooneatBobJones’schooloratDaytonHobb’sschooloratRodneyBell’sschooloratJackHyles’schooloratJerryFalwell’sschooltoldtheirreadersthattheAPOCRYPHAwasincludedasPARTOFTHEINSPIREDOLDTESTAMENT—INSERTEDBETWEENTHECANONICALBOOKSASCANONICAL—intheGreekmanuscript(theAlexandriantextsfromSinaiticusandVaticanus)recommendedbyBobJones,Wheaton,TennesseeTemple,PensacolaChristianCollege,Moody,Fuller,Piedmont,Biola,PacificCoastandDallas,whiletheAVtranslatorshadenoughsensetoknowthatnoneofthembelongedthere.ThisiswhytheAVtranslatorsstuckthemBETWEENtheTestaments—asthe“Scofieldnotes”—sothatnoonewouldthinktheywere“INSPIRED.”

Byduplicity,bycalculatedsubtlety,andwithintentiontodeceive,themodernapostateFundamentalistssimplyrefusedtotranslatetheMANUSCRIPTSWHICHTHEYRECOMMENDEDANDUSED(andpromoted)assuperiortotheAVmanuscripts.ByrefusingtotranslateALLofSinaticusandVaticanus,theapostateConservativesandFundamentalistsinAmericaledthebodyofChrist(for80years!!)tobelievethattheAVcontainedtheApocryphawhiletheASVandNASVandNIVdidn’t.TheGreekmanuscriptsfortheASV,NASVandNIVdocontaintheApocrypha,andnotbetweentheTestaments;theyarecontainedINtheOldTestament.

Wehopethereaderwillcheckallreferencesgiveninthistractus.Heistoldto“proveallthings”and“holdfasttotheformofSOUNDWORDS.”Heiscommandedtolet“NOMAN”deceivehim,andheistoldfurtherto“BENOTDECEIVED”andnottodeceive“HIMSELF”(Matt.24:4,1Cor.6:9,Gal.6:7).

Nohonestman(inthisage)hasanybusinessbelievingANYTHINGtaught,saidorwrittentoANYChristianleaderinAmericabeforecheckingthatmanoutwiththelivingwordsofthelivingGod.Nohonestman(inthisage)hasanybusinessacceptingthePROFESSIONofany“godly,dedicated,spirit-filled,militant,evangelical,soul-winningFundamentalist”ifthatprofessiondoesn’tlineupwiththelivingwordsofthelivingGod.Thetimehaslongpassed(1901)inAmericawhereanyBiblebelieverissafeinfollowinganyscholar,nomatterWHATthatscholarprofesses,wherethatscholarisengagedinturningabeliever’sfaithintheHolyBibletohimselfsothatheandhisfriendswillbethebeliever’sfinalauthority.

HUMANISMisthecurseofthiscentury,andnowhereisitmoremanifestthaninthese

Page 7: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

relativistic,subjectivehumanistswhoprofesstobelievein“theplenary,verbalinspirationoftheoriginalautographs.”Theyarethemosthumanisticrelativistsonthisearthoutsideofpureatheisticevolutionists.Thiswillbeapparentinwhatfollows.AttheendofthisbookletwehaveprintedacreedwhichhasappearedinprintfornearlythreeyearsintheBibleBelievers’Bulletin.YouwillfindthatitmatchesthePROFESSIONofeveryscholarwhowasconnectedwiththeNew“KingJames”Version—whichmoreaptlyshouldbecalledtheFalwell-NelsonversionortheHindson-Dobsonversion.TheAlexandrianCreedisthestandardconfessionofeverymemberoftheAlexandrianCultfromOrigen(250)toFarstad(1983).NotonememberoftheCultcanhonestlydenyalineofit,andnomatterhowsubtlyhetriestogetaroundhisadherencetoit,theCreedisatruestatementofwhatarealCultmemberbelieves.

NohonestmancouldrecommendtheNew“KingJames”Version(1982)toanyone.

TheonlypeoplewhocouldrecommenditwouldbefacultymembersofChristianschools,“militantFundamentalists,”Evangelicals,ConservativesandGreekandHebrewscholars.

Honestyisoutofthequestion.

WeshallproceedtoshowWHY.

Page 8: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

2.TheLastActinTheAlexandrianDrama,partI

HavingfolloweddetailedarticlesontheAlexandrianCultintheBulletinforaperiodofnearlythreeyears,BiblebelieverswerenotsurprisedtoseeDobson,Hindson,Towns,Hutson,FalwellandotherapostateFundamentalistsfinallypresentinga“New”AuthorizedVersiontoreplacethehatedandenviedonethatAmericanshadbeenusing,preaching,teachingandBELIEVINGformorethan200years.Farstad,ofDallasTheologicalSeminary,wasthemainspokesmaningettingtheNew“EcumenicalRat’sNest”published;andFalwell,ofcourse,didthepromotion.Themainorganofpromotionnowisamagazinecalled“THEFUNDAMENTALISTJOURNEY,”andthetwomajorspokesmenchosentodestroythefaithofAmericanyoungpeopleintheAV1611andtoreinstateitwiththeJFV(JerryFalwellVersion)areEdDobsonandEdHindson.NeithermanprofessestohavereadtheBibleortheScripturesasbothmendefinethetermsintheirownwritings.Tobothmen,“theBible”isnotinfallibleorinerrantinANYversion,andtheterm“Scripture”isnotareferencetoanyBibleanyoneinAmericahasread.

Thesetwosmooth,slick,softgentlemenhavenowbeensentoutas“associationalmissionaries”with“itineraries”designedtosellthe“NewKingJamesBible”(Falwell-Nelsonversion)toChristianyoungpeople.TheywillputouttheirpropagandaattheHighStreetBaptistChurchinSpringfield(DavidCavin),attheBaptistTemple(W.E.Dowell),atBaptistBibleCollege(Springfield),attheFirstBaptistChurchofFortWorth(JohnnyRamsey),atArlingtonBaptistCollege,andattheConservativeBaptistSeminaryatDenver,Colorado.

TheirmissionistocreateapopulardemandfortheFalwell-Nelsonversionsothatthesaleswillbebasedon“THEVOICEOFTHEPEOPLE”(seeFalwell’smagazine,p.30).TheideaistomakeChristiansbelievethatitwas“THEPEOPLE”whodemandedtheFalwell-Nelson1982version.Theterm“THEPEOPLE”is,ofcourse,borrowedfromCastro,MaoTse-tungandgoodoldAbrahamLincoln.Theexpressionwascommentedonatlengthin19872intheBibleBeliever’sCommentaryonActsinActs21:28,whichsee.

Ofcoursetherewasnomandatefrom“thepeople”atallfora“NewKingJamesVersion.”Themandatecamefromthehard-pressedapostatescholarsatfundamentalschoolswhosestudentbodieswereinanuproarovertheexposureofthehypocrisyofthosefacultymembersby“Ruckmanites.”No,“thepeople”requestednothing.TheBiblebelieversneedednothing.Thescholarsneededabreathoffreshairandreleasefrompressure.

ItistimenowfortherealBiblebeliever—certainlynoonelikeDobson,HindsonorFarstad—totakeacloselook,averycloselook,atwhatthesemodernapostateFundamentalistshavepassedoffasalegal“edition”orstandard“revision”oftheAVof1611.Theploy,ofcourse,forthe“patsies”wasthatsincetheAVhadbeenupdatedseveraltimessince1611thattheFalwell-Nelsonversion(NKJV)coulddoittooandyouwouldHAVETOACCEPTITASALEGITIMATEREVISIONBECAUSEYOUACCEPTEDTHEOTHERS.

NowthatisthegimmickthatHindson,Falwell,Hutson,Henderson,DobsonandFarstadworkedon,andthatishowitwillbepresentedtotheSTUDENTBODIESofSpringfield,

Page 9: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

Arlington,FortWorthandDenver.Theideaissimple.ThegimmickwillrelievethefacultymembersofanypressuretostickbytheTEXTthatalloftheirstudents(andthestudent’smothersandfatherandgrandmothersandgrandfathers)readandbelieved;instead,theycanbeweanedfromthistextandintroducedtoabastardtranslationthatmovesthemonceagainbacktotheASVof1901(Alexandriantext)andtheRSVof1952(Alexandriantext)while“usingtheTextusReceptus”(Syriantext).

ReadGenesis3:1.

TheFalwell-Nelsonedition(ortheHindson-Dobsonedition)thenneedstobeexaminedcloselybeforeanyoneisstupidenoughtotakethewordofthesegentlemenaboutit.SoherewebeginaseriesofarticlesontheFalwell-Nelsonedition.ThepointinthesearticleswillbetolisttheexactdocumentedevidencewhichcouldbeproducedinacourtoflawtoshowthatreadingsofunsavedLiberalsintheNationalCouncilofChurcheshavebeentakenfromtheRSVof1952andputintotheFalwell-NelsonversionandthatreadingsofapostateConservatives,followingtheAlexandrianGreektextofAfrica,havebeentakenfromtheNASV(arevisionoftheASVof1901)andputintotheNelson-Falwell(orHindson-Dobson)version;thiswholeSatanicanddeceitfuloperationwascarriedonundertheguilelesstitleoftheNew“KINGJAMES”Version.THEREISNOTONEEDITIONOFANYKINGJAMESBIBLEPUTOUTBYANYONEBEFORE1982THATCONTAINSTHERSVANDASVREADINGSWEAREGOINGTOLIST.

FirstofallwewillturntotheliberalreadingsoftheRSVpublishedbyDeanWeigleandtheNationalCouncilofChristianChurches,whichJerryFalwell,CurtisHutson,EdDobsonandEdHindsonarenowpromotingwiththeapprovalandwelcomeofArlington,Springfield,DenverandFortWorth.

Job1:1.(TherewasamaninthelandofUz,whosenamewasJob;andthatmanwasblamelessandupright,andonewhofearedGodandshunnedevil.—NKJV)Theword“blameless”isfoundinnoeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC.

Job3:7.(Oh,maythatnightbebarren!Maynojoyfulshoutcomeintoit!—NKJV)Theword“barren”isfoundinnoeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC.

Job3:8.(Maythosecurseitwhocursetheday,ThosewhoarereadytoarouseLeviathan.—NKJV)Theword“Leviathan”isnotfoundinanyeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC.

Job3:26.(Iamnotatease,noramIquiet;Ihaveorest,fortroublecomes.”—NKJV)ThepresenttenseisnotfoundinanyeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC,asintheexpression“troublecomes.”

Job4:4.(Yourwordshaveupheldhimwhowasstumbling,—NKJV)Theword“stumbling”isnotfoundinanyeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC—theCouncilthatsupportedCommunistblackkillersinAfrica(RhodesiaandGhana).

Job4:17.(CanamortalbemorerighteousthanGod?CanamanbemorepurethanhisMaker?—NKJV)Theword“can”isnotfoundinanyeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC,whichsupportsNormanVincentPeale,EarlStanleyJones,BishopSockman,BishopOxnamandGeorgeButtrick.

Job13:8.(WillyoushowpartialityforHim?WillyoucontendforGod?—NKJV)The

Page 10: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

word“partiality”isnotfoundinanyeditionoftheAV:itisfromtheRSVoftheNCCC.TheNelson-Falwellversion(orHindson-Dobsonversion)hasrefusedtotranslate“prosopoleptes”(Acts10:34)andsimilarwords(1Pet.1:17,Rom.2:11,Eph.6:9)anydifferentlythantherealwordsfor“partiality”(ADIAKRITOS,PROSKLISOS),whichtheAVtranslatedcorrectlyinJames3:17and1Timothy5:21inALLOFITSEDITIONS.

Job13:12(Yourplatitudesareproverbsofashes,Yourdefensearedefensesofclay.—NKJV)hasbeenborrowedfromtheRSVandbearsnoresemblancetoANYeditionoftheAVputoutANYtimebyANYONE.

Job13:27,28(Youputmyfeetinthestocks,Andwatchcloselyallmypaths.Yousetalimitforthesolesofmyfeet.“Mandecayslikearottenthing,Likeagarmentthatismoth-eaten.—NKJV)hasbeenpilferedfromtheRSVoftheNCCCandbearsnoresemblancetoanyeditionofanyAVputoutinanycenturybyanyone.

Job24:24(Theyareexaltedforalittlewhile,Thentheyaregone.Theyarebroughtlow;Theyaretakenoutofthewaylikeallothers;Theydryoutliketheheadsofgrain.—NKJV)ishalfwaytotheRSVanddoesnotmatchtheAV.

Job26:6(SheolisnakedbeforeHim,AndDestructionhasnocovering.—NKJV)readswiththeRSVoftheNCCCandagainstalleditionsoftheAVbyanyoneinanycountryinanycentury.

Job26:13(ByHisSpiritHeadornedtheheavens;Hishandpiercedthefleeingserpent.—NKJV)deniesthatGodmadeSatan.TheversematchestheRSVoftheNCCC(Communistsandall!)andgoesagainstalleditionsoftheAV.

Job30:29.(Iamabrotherofjackals,Andacompanionofostriches.—NKJV)SinceeverymanontheNelson-Falwelledition(orDobson-Hindsonedition)wasanINFIDELwhenitcametomattersofABSOLUTEAUTHORITY,theyallgotridofthe“dragons”inJob30:29andconvertedthemintoJACKALStomatchtheRSVoftheNCCC.

Job32:15-16.(“Theyaredismayedandanswernomore;Wordsescapethem.AndIhavewaited,becausetheydidnotspeak,Becausetheystoodstillandanswerednomore.—NKJV)ToridthemselvesoftheauthoroftheBook—seelengthydocumentedmaterialontheHebrewtextswhichweprintedin1980intheBibleBeliever’sCommentaryofJob(Job32:14-16)—the“New”KJVhasputtheentirepassageinquotationmarks(liketheRSVoftheNCCC).

TherearenoquotationmarksinANYHebrewmanuscript.

Job35:3.(Foryousay,‘WhatadvantagewillitbetoYou?WhatprofitshallIhave,morethanifIhadsinned?’—NKJV)ThereadingisfromtheRSVoftheNCCCandmatchesnoreadingofanyeditionofanyAVprintedinanycentury.

Job38:19.(“Whereisthewaytothedwellingoflight?Anddarkness,whereisitsplace,—NKJV)ThereadinghasbeenalteredtocoveruptheadvancedrevelationconcerningLIGHTwhichElihuhad(seeBibleBeliever’sCommentaryonJob[1980]onthepassage).

Job38:20.(Thatyoumaytakeittoitsterritory,Thatyoumayknowthepathstoitshome?—NKJV)ThewordschosenarethoseoftheRSVtextoftheNationalCouncilofChristianChurcheswhoareengagedinworldwideecumenicism.

Page 11: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

Job41:25.(Whenheraiseshimselfup,themightyareafraid;Becauseofhiscrashingstheyarebesidethemselves.—NKJV)ThereadingistheCommunistreadingoftheRSVfoundinnoeditionsofanyAVpublishedanywherebyanyone.

FootnoteonLeviathan:Job41:1,“ALARGESEACREATURE,EXACTIDENTITYUNKNOWN.”

ThisagnosticconfessionwasprintedafterthetranslatorshadexaminedthefourversesineveryeditionoftheAVeverprintedthatreadexactlylikeeachothersince1611.

Job41:1withPsalm74:14withIsaiah27:1withRevelation12:9.

Withthatadvancedrevelationof1611—ANDALLSUBSEQUENTEDITIONS—infrontoftheirfaces,thesepoor,ignorant,deludedGreekandHebrew“scholars”professedAGNOSTICISMattheverseandlaiddownafiatintheformofadogmaticdecreewhichstatedthatnooneknewEXACTLYwhatthereferencewasto.THEREARENOTTHREEHIGHSCHOOLSTUDENTSATOURCHURCHWHODONOTKNOWTHEIDENTITYOFTHE“SEACREATURE”sinceMartinLutheridentifiedhimbefore1570.

Thisisthe“scholarship”thatprofessedtorepresent“THEVOICEOFTHEPEOPLE”atLynchburg,Virginia,DallasandFortWorthandnow—on“evangelistictour”—Denver,ArlingtonandSpringfield.

“BENOTDECEIVED,GODISNOTMOCKED.”

“LETNOMANDECEIVEYOUBYANYMEANS.”

“LETNOMANDECEIVEHIMSELF.”

TheNew“KingJamesVersion”isan“ecumenicalrat’snest.”InournextarticlewewilltakeupalistoftheASVreading(andNASVreadings)whichweresmuggledintothetextwhileretainingthetitle“KINGJAMES”tosellthetext.IftheHolySpiritwillblessandhonorsuchapublication,thenHehasgoneagainsttheattributesofGod’sessentialNATURE.ItistruethattheHolySpiritcanUSEanyversion,andtheseapostateFundamentalistswilltakeanythingtheycanusetomakeafastbuck;buttheywillhavetopromotesalestofakea“blessing.”Theyarehumanisticopportunistsofthefirstorder.NotoneofthembelievesanythingbuttheCREEDwhichyouwillfindprintedatthebottomofthisfile.

TheyareHUMANISTICRELATIVISTSforanapostatechurch(Laodicea),andtheirrecommendations,criticisms,scholarshipandadvicemayberejectedbyanyBiblebelieverwithoutbattinganeye(2Cor.2:17).

Page 12: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

3.TheLastActinTheAlexandrianDrama,partII

AswehaveseentheapostateFundamentalistsinthisagebackslidetotheproperposition—beliefintheAVof1611asthefinalauthorityinallmattersoffaithandpractice—wehaveseenthemabandontheRVof1884fortheASVof1901,thenabandontheASVof1901fortheNASVof1960,thenabandontheNASVof1960fortheNIVof1980,andthenfinallyabandontheAlexandrianrevisionsoutwardly—whichALLprofessedtoberevisionsoftheAVof1611-andthencomeoutwithabastard“KingJamesBible”thatisnomorealegitimaterevisionthantheASVorRVorRSV.

ThisefforttoappeartobeABELIEVERisquitetypicalofhypocriticalprofessionsbyallthehypocritesinanyageofthechurch.ThetrickistofoolthegenuineBible-believingChristianintothinkingthatbecauseaprofessionismadeofbelievinginsome“verballyinspiredScriptures”thatgotlost,thatthisqualifiesthescholarlyhypocritetobeclassifiedasa“BIBLEBELIEVER.”AllofthemenontheNew“KingJames”Falwell-Nelsoneditionofthe“Bible”professedtobelievetheCultCreedwhichweprintintheBulletin.Every“jackman”ofthembelievedthatGodlosttheinerrant,infalliblewordsoftruthandthatnooneonearthhasseenthemsince400A.D.orearlier.Thisiswhattheincrediblephoniescalla“militant”standfor“historicFundamentalism.”ItmeansMaryhadalittlelambandLucyLockettlostherpocket.AllcowardsrunfromPROVABLEFACTSasfastastheycanrun.Sincetherearenooriginalsanywheretoprovewhetherany“Fundamentalistbelievestherightthingornot,“believingintheverbal,plenaryinspiredoriginalautographs”canbethestandardpositionforanycowardlyhypocritetotakeinthisage.Itisasafeposition.Nobodycancheckthedirtyliartoseeifheistellingthetruthornot.All“qualifiedFundamentalistscholars”takethisposition.Theyalwayshave.Theyhavealwaysfearedridiculemorethandeathandchargesof“heresy”morethanGod.

NowtheNew“KingJames”Bible,likeeveryEnglishtranslationsince1884,hadtocompareitselfwiththeoriginalAVof1611,forthisistheSTANDARDthatGodsetupwherebytojudgealltranslations.ThisexplainswhyeventhosewhodonotbelieveTHATstillgobyitandabidebyitasaruleforPUBLICATION.NoeditionoftheEnglishBiblesince1880(RV,RSV,NRSV,ASV,NASV,IV,NIV,NEB,etc.)couldsellunlessitfirstcompareditselfwiththeabsolutestandardoftruthsetupbytheHolySpirit.Falwell’s“Hindson-Nelson”Bibleisnodifferent.ItcannotsellbycomparingitselftoanRVorRSVorNIVorASVorNEBorNASVorNRSV.ItmustcompareitselfwiththeAuthorizedVersionof1611.

Asinallothercases,thecomparisonprovestobefatal,fornotonlyisthis“ecumenicalrat’snest”afaithfulreproductionofscoresofreadingsofunsavedLiberalsintheNationalCouncilofChurches—nodon’tgetmad;readtheDOCUMENTEDEVIDENCEGIVENCHAPTERANDVERSEinthelastarticle—butitalsocontainsscoresofWestcottandHortAlexandrianreadingsastheyarefoundintheASVandNASV.Afewofthemare:

Proverbs1:4,“prudence”(Togiveprudencetothesimple,Totheyoungmanknowledgeanddiscretion—NKJV).

Proverbs1:5,“wisecounsel”(Awisemanwillhearandincreaselearning,Andamanof

Page 13: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

understandingwillattainwisecounsel,—NKJV).

Proverbs1:6,“riddles”(Tounderstandaproverbandanenigma,Thewordsofthewiseandtheirriddles.—NKJV).

Proverbs1:32,“complacency”(Fortheturningawayofthesimplewillslaythem,Andthecomplacencyoffoolswilldestroythem;—NKJV).

Proverbs2:1,“treasure”(Myson,ifyoureceivemywords,Andtreasuremycommandswithinyou,—NKJV).

Proverbs2:7,“storesup”(Hestoresupsoundwisdomfortheupright;Heisashieldtothosewhowalkuprightly;—NKJV).

Proverbs7:6,“lattice”(ForatthewindowofmyhouseIlookedthroughmylattice,—NKJV).

Proverbs7:11,“rebellious”(Shewasloudandrebellious,Herfeetwouldnotstayathome.—NKJV).

Proverbs7:12,“opensquare”(Attimesshewasoutside,attimesintheopensquare,Lurkingateverycorner.—NKJV).

Proverbs7:16,“colored”(Ihavespreadmybedwithtapestry,ColoredcoveringsofEgyptianlinen.—NKJV).

Proverbs8:17,“diligently”(Ilovethosewholoveme,Andthosewhoseekmediligentlywillfindme.—NKJV).

Proverbs12:4,“excellent”(Anexcellentwifeisthecrownofherhusband,Butshewhocausesshameislikerottennessinhisbones.—NKJV).

Proverbs14:12;15:4;19:24;20:1;20:2;20:24;21:27;25:25;26:11;30:28(seefootnote);30:31andscoresofotherplaces.

TheNew“KingJames”BiblethenisnotaKingJamesBibleatallnorisitrelatedtoanyrevisionofanyeditionofanyAVputoutinthelast300yearsbyanyone.ItisaresurrectedASV-RSVfordeadorthodoxConservativesandapostateFundamentalistsincollegesanduniversitieswhostillholdtotheirORIGINALPOSITION:theycancorrecttheBibleanytimetheyfeellikeitbecausetheyaresuperiorintellectswhoareinchargeofabsoluteauthority.ItisthismaniacalobsessionthatmakesmenlikeMassey,atRodneyBell’sschool,insistthathecanfindouttheEXACTWORDthatGodgavePaulwhenPaulwrotehismanuscripts;anditisthissamefantasticegotismthatmakespatsieslikeStewartCuster(BobJonesUniversity)tellusthathereadsthe“verballyinspiredoriginal”NewTestamentdailybecausehe“holdsit”inhishand.Bythesametoken,phoneybread-and-butterprophetslikeEdHindsonandEdDobson(whomakealivingwithsmooth,slicktalkaboutmedicineandmarriage)pretendtheyareBiblebelieverswhenneithermanhaseverreadTHEWORDorTHEWORDSofGodsincehewenttocollege.BothmenprofessthatthewordsofGodwerelostandthattheyhaveneverbeenrestoredtoanyone(seeFalwell’sOctober1982issueoftheFundamentalistmagazine).

NowwhowastheNelson-Falwell“Bible”translatedfor?Sinceitprivatelyinterprets2Thessalonians2:7tobetheHolySpirit,inspiteofthewarningagainstthiskindofthingin

Page 14: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

2Peter2,wemaywellsuspectthattheNew“KingJames”BiblewasahandmadeproductionforalargeclassofChristianswhodesireCERTAINOTHERSINSTOBEGLOSSEDOVERANDCOVEREDUP.

Thesefivesinsareasfollows,andtheBiblebeliever—certainlynotanyonelikeHindson,Dobson,Sumner,Custer,BobJones,III,orHutson—shouldcarefullynotethereferencesandmarkthem.

TheNew“KingJames”Bible(theNewAmerican,NewKing,NewStandard,NewAuthorized,NewJames,NewRevisedRat’sNest)wasmadetobesoldtoFundamentalistswhowantedtobelievethat:

1.ItisallrighttocorruptthewordofGodaslongasyoudon’t“peddle”it.ObservehowNOEDITIONOFANYKINGJAMESBIBLEREADSwithFalwell-Nelsonin2Corinthians2:17,“Forwearenot,assomany,peddlingthewordofGod;butasofsincerity,butasfromGod,wespeakinthesightofGodinChrist”(NKJV).

2.ItispropertoholdthewordofGodinunrighteousnessaslongasyouaren’tguiltyof“suppressing”it.SeethereadinginRomans1:18,“ForthewrathofGodisrevealedfromheavenagainstallungodlinessandunrighteousnessofmen,whosuppressthetruthinunrighteousness”(NKJV),whereitmatchestheRSVoftheNCCC.

3.Itispropertoappeartobedoingevilaslongasyoudon’tactuallyDOevil.SeetheRSVreadingoftheNCCCinFalwell-Nelson’s“Bible”in1Thessalonians5:22,“Abstainfromeveryformofevil”(NKJV),whichisnotinlinewithanylineofAuthorizedVersionspublishedbyanyoneinEnglandorAmericainanycentury.

4.ItisallrighttochangethetruthofGodintoaLIEaslongasyoudon’t“exchange”itforsomething.SeeinRomans1:25,“Whoexchangedthetruthofgodforthelie,andworshippedandservedthecreatureratherthantheCreator,whoisblessedforever.Amen”(NKJV),theRSVreadingoftheNCCCinFalwell’s“Bible”whichisnomorean“edition”oftheAVthanHanselandGretel.

5.Itisallrighttosubstitutefinancialgainforgodlinessortoacceptfinancialincomeasaproofofgodlinessaslongasyoudon’tthinkthatgodlinessisaMEANSofgain.Seein1Timothy6:5,“Uselesswranglingsofmenofcorruptmindsanddestituteofthetruth,whosupposethatgodlinessisameansofgain.Fromsuchwithdrawyourself”(NKJV),thecorruptreadingofFalwell-NelsonwhichcamefromtheAlexandriantextof1901(ASV).

Now,theseverseswerepervertedbecausetheNew“KingJames”Versionwasaimedataselecttypeofclientele;certainlyitwasnotaimedatanyonewhoREADtheBibleandKNEWtheBibleorBELIEVEDtheBible.Itwasaimedpointedlyanddirectlyatacertainsmooth,slick,typeofculturedintelligentsiawhohadthickPOCKETBOOKS.Toprotectthisbunchofapostate“Fundamentalists,”theFalwell-Nelson-HindsonDobson“Bible”altered1Timothy6:10,“Fortheloveofmoneyisarootofallkindsofevil,forwhichsomehavestrayedfromthefaithintheirgreediness,andpiercedthemselvesthroughwithmanysorrows”(NKJV),sothattheloveofmoneywouldNOTbetherootofallevil.TheFalwell-Hindson-Dobson-NelsonBibleadoptedheretheAlexandrianreadingoftheRSVoftheNationalCouncilofCommunistchurches.“BIRDSOFAFEATHERFLOCKTOGETHER”;andsince“MONEYANSWERETHALLTHINGS”(seeanyeditionoftheKingJamesBibleexceptthelastLaodiceanfarce),thefinaltestoftheauthorityfor

Page 15: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

thisnewRat’sNestwasfoundinaversethatdealtwithINCOME.TheLaodiceanchurchwas“increasedwithgoods”andknewnotthatitwasPOORandwretchedandmiserableandnakedand(aboveall!)BLIND.Justasblindasabat.

Page 16: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

4.TheLastActinTheAlexandrianDrama,partIII

Fromourpreviousarticleswehaveshown(beyondanyshadowofadoubt)thattheso-calledNew“KingJames”Versionisasfarfrombeingalegitimate“revision”oftheAVasonewouldfindshortoftheRSVoftheNationalCouncilofChurches.WelistedoveradozenreadingsinonebookalonethatcamerightoutoftheRSVandNRSVoftheNationalCouncil,theoutfitthathasbeensendingmoneytoCommunistguerillasinAfricafornearlythreedecades.TheRSVcamefromtheAlexandrianNorthAfricantextofOrigen-Hort-Nestle-Eusebius-Constantineandcompany(exactlyastheASVof1901did),andwehavedocumentedthesetruthsscoresoftimesindozensofpublications.Wesawfurtherthatthephony“NewKJV”hadreinstatedadozenASVreadingsfrom1901underthepretenseof“continuing”inthe“tradition”oftheAVtranslators.Whileprofessingthis,thesefalseprofessorsofbeliefintheBibledidawaywitheveryverseintheNewTestamentthatdealtwiththeirownsins:Romans1:18(“ForthewrathofGodisrevealedfromheavenagainstallungodlinessandunrighteousnessofmen,whosuppressthetruthinunrighteousness.”—NKJV),Romans1:25(“whoexchangedthetruthofGodforthelie,andworshippedandservedthecreatureratherthantheCreator,whoisblessedforever.Amen.”—NKJV),1Timothy6:5(“uselesswranglingsofmenofcorruptmindsanddestituteofthetruth,whosupposethatgodlinessisameansofgain.Fromsuchwithdrawyourself.”—NKJV),1Timothy6:10,(“Fortheloveofmoneyisarootofallkindsofevil,forwhichsomehavestrayedfromthefaithintheirgreediness,andpiercedthemselvesthroughwithmanysorrows.”—NKJV),1Timothy6:20(“OTimothy!Guardwhatwascommittedtoyourtrust,avoidingtheprofaneandvainbabblingsandcontradictionsofwhatisfalselycalledknowledge—”—NKJV),and2Corinthians2:17(“Forwearenot,assomany,peddlingthewordofGod;butasofsincerity,butasfromGod,wespeakinthesightofGodinChrist.”—NKJV).TheiralibiwasthatsincetheybelievedthatsomewhereGodwrotesomethingthatwaslosteighteencenturiesagoandthatsincetheAVtranslatorsdidnotprofesstobe“inspired,”a1982Rat’sNestwasjustasauthoritativeastheAVof1611.

Toinsurethemaximumamountofunbeliefinabsoluteauthority—thisisthepurposeofallaccreditedhighereducation(secularorsacred)—severalphotostaticcopiesofthe1611editionwereputout.Thepervertedthinkingofthesickmindsbehindthiswasthatwhenthesepoor,stupid,Bible-believingsuckersnoticethattheAVof1611doesn’tmatchwordforwordtheAVtheyhavebelievedandused,theBiblebelieverswilllosefaithintheonetheyhavebelievedandaccepttheNKJVASANEQUAL.

Thiswastheplanandpurposeofthe“godly”menwhoputoutthislatestpieceofAtheniantrash.

They,likemanysickpeople,wishtospreadtheirowndisease.

Theideaisthatsince“wearenotBiblebelieversbutprofesstobe,youcandenythewordofGodandstillpassoffforonetoo,likeUS.”

Theancientchestnutabouttheneedfor“updating”theAVof1611washauledoutofthefire.ThisstandardlieusedbyallapostateswasdoneinthefaceofthefactthattheAVhad

Page 17: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

been“updated”in1876bySmith,in1885byDillard,in1894byLewis,in1897byWeekes,in1895byFenton,in1903byWeymouth,in1913byMoffatt,in1919byCunningham,in1923byGoodspeed,in1925byOverbury,in1933byTorrey,in1881byWilliams,in1842byBernard,in1864byAndersonandin1904byWorrell.

TakingadvantageofthefactthatmostChristiansinthebodyofChristknewnothingabouttheseSIXTEENattemptsatupdatingitinlessthanninetyyears,thetranslatorsoftheNew“KingJames”Versionwentback300yearsandpulledalongsidethe1611tomeasurethemselves,forgettingthatthatisexactlywhatthetranslatorsoftheRVin1884haddone;exactlywhatthetranslatorsoftheASVin1901haddone;exactlywhatthetranslatorsoftheRSVin1946haddone;exactlywhatthetranslatorsoftheNASVin1950haddone;andexactlywhattheNIVtranslatorsin1980haddone.

Whenitcametomotives,method,aimsandpurpose,theNKJVtranslatorsfollowedintheexactfootstepsoftheworstLiberalsandmostapostateConservativesinthenation.

Theseincrediblecon-menactuallystatedthatafter371yearsthe“AVhasbeencarefullyUPDATEDSOTHATITWILLONCEAGAINspeakGod’seternaltruthswithclarity.”

Youaretobelievethatithasn’tfor371years.

Youaretobelievethatthemuddledmess(accordingtothem)thatWhitefield,Wesley,Sunday,Moody,Finney,Cartwright,Patton,WilliamBooth,JonathanEdwards,SheldonJackson,J.FrankNorris,GypsySmith,MelTrotter,andBobJones,Sr.,madeofthingswasdonewithaBookthatdidn’t“SPEAKGOD’SETERNALTRUTHSWITHCLARITY.”

Whatkindofinferiordumbbellswouldpresumetospeaksuchnonsense?Well,alistgives:ArthurFarstadandWalterBodineofDallasTheologicalSeminary;EdHindsonandElmerTownsofLibertyBaptistCollegeinLynchburg;MerdithKlineandBoyceBlackwelder,E.M.BlaiklockandJamesPrice(TennesseeTempleSchoolsinChattanooga);W.H.McDowellandTrumanDollar(KansasCityBaptistTemple:BibleBaptistFellowship);JerryFalwell(whowouldn’tknowaPielinHebrewfromaHiphil);A.V.Henderson(TempleBaptistChurch,Detroit:BaptistBibleFellowship);HerschelHobbs,CurtisHutson(Editorofthe“SwordoftheLord”);ClydeNarramore(amateurpsychologist);andHaroldOckenga(theNeo-EvangelicalpresidentofGordon-ConwellTheologicalSeminary).

Thesearethemenwhoallowedtheirnamestobeusedinanadvertisingbrochurecalled“WHYTHENEWKINGJAMESVERSION”afterastatementthattheywereupdatingaBookthathadnotspokenwithclarityfor371years!

Whydoyousupposethesebacksliddenegotistsdidnotdaresaythatitwasanew“AUTHORIZEDVERSION”theywereputtingout?Thatisthenomenclatureweusethroughoutourwritings.WhathappenedtotheBook’sAUTHORITY?

Simple.Thebacksliddenwretcheswhoperverted2Corinthians2:17,1Timothy6:5,10,20andRomans1:18,25wereauthorizedtodonothingandtheHolySpiritwouldnomoreauthorizewhattheydidthanwhattheLockmanFoundationdidwhenitputouttheNASV.

Thereisnomentionofthe“MANOFSIN”intheprefaceofthisnewversion.Howisthis?IntheDedicatoryoftheAV(anyeditionthathastheDedicatory)itidentifiesthe

Page 18: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

popeas“THEMANOFSIN.”

Andthesedeadorthodoxapostatesare“continuinginthattradition”arethey?

Youwouldn’twoofuswouldyou,buster?

Whowasitthatauthorizedthisversion?WasitaKING(seeEcc.8:4)?Ofcoursenot;itwasapublishingcompanythatmakesitslivingbysellingbooks.Observethat“INTHEEARLY1970sTHOMASNELSONPUBLISHERS…BEGANTOSENSEAGROWINGNEEDFORTHEKINGJAMESVERSIONOFTHEBIBLETOBEREVISEDONCEAGAIN”(p.8).Afterwhat?Why,afterThomasNelsonhadpublishedtheASVof1901bythefive-point,baby-sprinkling,pro-CatholicPhilipSchaffandaftertheRSVof1952—putoutbyDeanLutherWeigleandthegreatestministerialCommunistsintheUnitedStates!

THEPUBLISHERS“FELTTHENEED”DIDTHEY?

Youwouldn’tgiveustheshaftwouldyou,sonnyboy?

DoyouthinkthatsomeofusareasstupidasthemenconnectedWITHANYTHING“THOMASNELSON”PUTOUTFROM1901to1982thatwasn’tarealAuthorizedVersion?

Thiswretchedcommitteeof1982saidtheywantedtoPRESERVE“THECONTENToftheAVof1611”(p.9).Didtheydoit?WejustlistedthecontentoftheASVinascoreofplacesshowingthatThomasNelsonPublisherssimplytriedtoreinstatewhattheyhadlostinsalesontwootherversions.IsanyonefoolenoughtothinkthatActs4:27and1Thessalonians5:22intheNew“KingJames”Versionisthe“CONTENTOFTHE1611AV”?

Sure:thesuckerswholistentofacultymembersofChristianschoolswithoutcheckingthetext.Sure:thedingbatswhomakealivingoffofcorrectingtheAV.Sure:themonumentbuilderswhowantaTOOLinsteadofanAuthority.Willwe“buytheact”?Notonyourtin-type.DownherewecallthisMadisonAvenuegaffedact“THENEWAMERICAN,NEWKING,NEWSTANDARD,NEWJAMES,NEWAUTHORIZED,NEWREVISEDRAT’SNEST.”Wrongmotive,wrongaim,wrongmethod,wrongtextandwrong“bedfellows.”

AtthePensacolaBibleInstitutewewillcontinuetousetheBookthatGoddeliveredintoourhandsbyHisgracein1949.ThatBook,translatedunderaKing(Ecc.8:4)whosecountryisthestandardforthetimefoundontheWATCHESonthewristsofthenewrevisioncommittees(andthelocationonthisearthoftheircities!),hasbeenkeptinerrantbytheGraceofGodandpreservedthroughtheyearsinspiteofthemaniacalegotismofLaodiceanapostateswhothinkthattheycancompetewithit.WethankGodfortheoldAuthorizedVersion(anyeditionbefore1982)whichGodhaskeptforusinspiteof“godlyandreverentChristian”scholarswhobelievein“plenary,verballyinspiredScriptures”whichnoonehaseverreadorseen.

ThankGodfortheoldBOOK!ThankGodforits“THEEs”and“THOUs”and“YEs.”ThankGodforits“ITROWNOT”and“WEWISTNOT”and“WASWONTTOBEMADE.”ThankGodHestillshowsthingstoanyBiblebelieverfromthatBookwithaclarityandluciditythatblindsthemindsofpoor,miserable,Bible-rejectingidiotswho

Page 19: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

fancythatbecausetheybelievein“fundamentals”theyhavethesenseGodgavetoastuffedYAK.Godsaid,“LETTHEREBELIGHT!!”Hespokeandwehaveit,andthankGodwehaveitwithouttheassistanceofpoor,deludedsinnersliketheblanksonthe“NEWKJV”committee.

Page 20: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

5.TheNew“KingJames”ASVofThomasNelson

Aswehaveseen,theso-called“NewKJV”isnotarealeditionoftheAuthorizedVersioninanysenseoftheword.ThelamealibithatitissinceitwastranslatedfromtheTextusReceptuswillnotworkatall,asscoresofRSVreadings(theNCCC)andASVreadings(PhilipSchaff,1901)werethrustbackintoitstextandtheAuthorizedreadingswhichhadbeenperfectlyconstantthroughEVERYEDITIONforover300yearswerethrownout.WehavealsoobservedthattheapostatesconnectedwiththisrevisionwerecarefultotrimitintheproperplacessothatitwouldsuittheLaodiceantemperamentofmonumentbuilders.NotonlyweretheRSVattacksontheDeityofChristinsertedintoActs4:27andPhilippians2:7(thisversewaschangedagaininlatereditionsoftheNKJV)—whileprofessingto“polishwithsensitivity”and“enhanceitsoriginallyintendedbeauty”(Farstad’sgasbagline)—buttheAthenianant-eaters(seeBibleBeliever’sCommentaryonActs,1972;Acts17)wereabsolvedoftheir“superstition”andmadeouttobefairlyrespectable;thiswasdonebyremovingtheword“SUPERSTITIOUS”(Acts17:22),whichhasbeenineveryeditionoftheAVsince1611.Naturally,thiswasdonewhileprofessingthattheAVwasbeing“sensitivelyrevised”sothatthe“thoughtflow”would“holdcloselytothetraditionalSTRUCTURE”(notethehotairgasbagoftheprofessionalcon-manashebelchesouthis“pitch”tothesucker).

Afteradmittingthattherootsourceforthe1982“revision”wasthedesireofabookpublishingcompanytoreinstateportionsoftwoofitsdefunctpublications(theRSVof1952andtheASVof1901),thebodyofChristisnowtobelievethattherewasarealgrassroots“demand”forthispieceofGod-dishonoringtrash.Thegrassroots,however,turnouttobe“100churchleaders”(p.8)whorepresentlessthanonefiftiethoftheborn-again,soul-winningpastorsintheUnitedStatesalone.Thisselectgroupofelite“churchleaders”allsignedthestandard,phoney-baloneyAlexandrianCreedwhichstatesthat“theScripturesARETHEUNIQUELYINSPIREDWORDOFGOD.”Fromthiswemusttakeforgrantedthatnotonescholaroutofthe100couldtranslateorinterprettheVERBTENSEofhisownlanguage,English,forthehorribletruthisthatnotonemanonthe1982committeeeverbelievedadayinhislifethat“theScripturesAREtheuniquelyinspiredwordofGod.”TheysimplyliedtomakeyouthinktheywereBiblebelievers.Everymanonthelist(ofover100)believesthattheScripturesWEREthewordofGodwhentheywereoriginallywritten.Thelyingverb“ARE”and“IS”isalwaysinsertedintotheirprofessionstomakeyouthinktheybelievethatthey(oryou)HAVEarealBible.Youwillnoticethatafterthislyingprofessionacarefulpostscriptisaddedtocoverupthelyingsinoftheapostate:i.e.,“freefromerrorINTHEORIGINALAUTOGRAPHS.”

ObservethatintheScriptures(anyversionofanyeditionpublishedbyanyoneinanylanguage)theterm“SCRIPTURES”isneverareferenceto“originalautographs”(seeMatt.21:42;22:29,Mark12:10,Luke4:21,John2:22;5:39;20:9,Acts8:32;8:35;18:24,Romans9:17;15:4,1Tim.5:18,2Tim.3:15,16,2Pet.3:16).

The100“churchleaders”thenareguiltyofstupidityandhypocrisyinthesamestrokebytheirownprofession.

1.Theydonotandcannotusetheword“SCRIPTURES”asthetermisdefinedandused

Page 21: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

intheOldandNewTestament,inanyeditionofanyversion.

2.TheyhaveinventedatermwhichoccursnowhereineitherTestament,inanytranslation,inanylanguage,inanyrevision,putoutbyanyone.

3.ThiswasdonetocoveruptheirownunbeliefintheWORDSofGodwhichtheydonotbelieveEXISTinaBook.Theyliedabout“ARE”becausetheyreallybelievenothingofthekind.Theybelieve“theScripturesWEREthewordofGod.”

EVERYMEMBEROFTHEALEXANDRIANCULTFROMORIGENTOEDHINDSONBELIEVEDTHATANDEIGHTEENCENTURIESHASNOTCHANGEDONEMANINTHECULTAHAIRSBREADTHFROMTHATLYINGANDHYPOCRITICALPROFESSIONWHICHALLCULTLEADERSWILLPROFESSUNTILTHESECONDADVENTOFJESUSCHRIST.

Now,thosewholook“welltotheirgoing”andtakeheednotto“believeeveryword”(Prov.14:15)arenotfooledbythegaffedactoftheseprofessionalconartists.Youactuallyhavetohaveconsiderableeducationtobeasstupidasmostofthese“churchleaders”are.Forexample,anyhonestman—withoutanyeducation—wouldhavebeenlearyofthewholeFalwell-Nelson-Hindson-Dobson(1982)operationifhehadsimplynoticedtheWORDSthattheoutfitusedtogetacrosstheirphoneyrevision.

“BecausemillionsloveandusetheKingJamesVersionITMUSTSPEAKCLEARLY,sothatALLwhoreadmayunderstand”(p.7).

NowwhatBiblebelieverwouldbuythatpitch?“ALLWHOREAD”?Whyanyfoolonthisearthknowsthatthe“naturalmanreceivethnotthethingsoftheSpiritofGod”nomatterhow“clearly”theyspeak.Whodidn’tknowthatbutanunsavedmantowhomitapplied?Aretheytellingusthatunsavedpeopledon’tUSEtheKingJamesVersion(seeabove)?AretheytellingusthatmillionswhoLOVEitareworriedaboutitnotspeakingclearly?Imaginethehypocrisyof“godlyscholars”whowouldwriteathinglikethatafteradmittingthatthedemandfortheirrevisioncamefromabookpublishingcompanythatcouldn’tsellenoughoftwoversionsithadpublished!!

“ButthereisstillneedforaSTANDARDBible…onethatspeaksCLEARLY.”

WhatdidGodsayaboutthatinProverbs8:9?WhowouldbedumbenoughtobelievepoorsinnerslikeEdHindson,EdDobson,JerryFalwellandFarstadafterGodHIMSELFhadalreadyspokenaboutsuchmatters?

WhatrealBiblebelieverdoesn’tknowthatifANYtextofANYversionwas“revised”into“updatedlanguage”itcouldn’tbeunderstoodbyareprobateevenwhileheprofessedtoloveit?LookatJohn8:43.

LookatwhattheHolySpiritsaidabout“understanding”someone’sspeechintheBible(John8:43).ThePhariseestherewerehearingwordsinalanguagetheyunderstoodperfectlyanditwasnotTENYEARS“OUTOFDATE.”Theystillcouldn’tgetit.“UPDATING”hadnoeffectonwhattheyheardnomatterwhosaiditorwhenitwassaid.ImaginesomeoneactuallybelievingapostateslikeHindson,DobsonandFarstadabout“updating”afterbeingtoldbytheHolySpiritthatunderstandingtheScriptureswasdependentuponJESUSCHRISTHIMSELF(Luke24:45)openingaman’sunderstanding.

Page 22: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

ButtheseLaodiceanegotistsgomuchfurtherthanthis!

Indescribingtheirwork,themodernapostatestellusthatthe“updating”theydidwas“alongandthoughtfulprocess”(p.11)(notaPRAYERFULPROCESS)andthatitrequired“thesamekindofpatienceandCARE…aswasusedbythetranslatorsof1611”(p.11).

Wasit?Didit?

Howthendidtheyomitareferencetothe“MANOFSIN”intheirpreface?

Howdidtheythoughtfullyandwith“patience”and“care”decidetoattacktheDeityofChristinActs4:27tobringthe1611editionintolinewiththeNationalCouncilofChristianChurchesinAmericain1952?

Howdidthey“thoughtfully”(withpatienceandcare)decidetocoveruptheirownsinsinRomans1:18,25,1Timothy6:10,20and2Corinthians2:17inordertomaintain“highstandardsofACCURACY,READABILITYandBEAUTY”(p.9).

Isthereanyonereadingthispagewhowouldtrustamanwhowouldevensay“READABILITY”?Ifamanis“sharing”(p.8)“thoughtflows”(p.8),wouldanyrealsoul-winning,Bible-believingyoungmantakehimtobeanythingbutasmooth,slick,opportunist?WhatmanwhoreadshisBiblehasnotbeenwarnedabout“GOODWORDSANDFAIRSPEECHES”(Rom.16:18),unlessitistheapostatesthemselveswhoalsoalteredTHATverse(Rom.16:18)tocoveruptheirsins?

FACEIT:anhonestmancouldnotrecommendsuchaversionnomatterWHOwasrecommendingit.A“Fundamentalist”couldrecommenditonan“Evangelicalchurchleader,”butanhonestMANisoutofthequestion.NomanwhoknewhisBiblewouldfailtoseetheSatanicdevices(2Cor.2:11)whicharedesignedforonepurposealone:INCOMEBYDECEPTION.

Page 23: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

6.TheBottomLineontheSo-CalledNew“KJV”

Aswehaveseenfromthepreviousarticles,theNew“KingJames”VersionisnotaKingJamesVersionatall,norisitconnectedwithorrelatedtoanyeditionsoftheAuthorizedVersionputoutinthelast300yearsbyanyone.ItcontainsscoresofRSVandASVreadings,attackstheDeityofChrist(Acts4),coversupforthesinsoftheAlexandrianCult(Rom.1:18,25;16:18,1Tim.6:20),confusestheplaintruth(2Tim.2:15),justifiesAthenianGreekphilosophers(Acts17:22),encouragesdisobediencetotheScriptures(1Thess.5:22),deniestherootofallevilinthispresentworldsystem(1Tim.6:10),andtonesdowntheharshwordsof1611sotheywillbeacceptableto1983kiddyteachersanddayschoolprincipals(seePhil.3:8,21).

Inadditiontothis,wehavenotedthesmooth,slick,pious,twentiethcenturynewsmedialinegivenoutbyFarstad(DallasTheologicalSeminary)topawnoffthisfake“Bible.”Thebrochuresandadsarerepletewithsuchartificialandleavenedexpressionsas“thoughtflow,”“readability,”“share,”“rhythmicflow,”“growingneed,”“polishwithsensitivity,”“higheststandardsofscholarship,”“thoroughresearch,”“thoughtfulprocess,”“debatablevaluejudgments,”andsimilarnewsmediabaloneythatcomesfromthestateuniversitiesandstatecolleges.

Afterconfessingthatthe“need”forthis1982versioncamefromabooksellingcompanythathadlostsomemoneyprintingASVs(andRSVs),the“ScholarlyTeam”(p.30)signedthestandardAlexandrianCultCreedwhichweprintintheBulletin.“Godwrotesomethingbutlostit.”

Aswehavepointedout,thislyingprofessionisbaseduponhopingthatthereaderoftheCreedwillfailtodiscerntheVERBTENSEoftheEnglish.ThewordsattestedtobyHenderson,Hutson,Hindson,Falwell,Dobson,Towns,Kline,Hobbs,Ockengaandcrewarethat“THESCRIPTURESINTHEIRENTIRELYARETHEUNIQUELYINSPIREDWORDOFGOD….”Noticethateveryliarwhosignedthatbelievednothingofthekind.HebelievedthattheORIGINALSCRIPTURESWERETHEWORDSOFGOD,buttheword“Word”hasbeensubstitutedtocoverupthesinofunbelief.“Word”istheNeo-OrthodoxwordfortheBiblesincenoNeo-OrthodoxadherentbelievesthatanyonecanobtainGod’sWORDS.

Asallmodernapostateeducators,thesetheologicalphoniescountupontheIGNORANCEofthebodyofChristinordertopassoffthecounterfeit.Themostsubtlewaytodoit(sothatanyobjectorcanbeaccusedofbeingtoonegativeortoocritical!)istosimplyLIEABOUTTHEVERBTENSEOFYOUROWNLANGUAGE.

Everymanonthecommitteedidit.Weknewtheywould.Wewouldexpectitofthem.Asamatteroffact,wementionedthisinfivepublicationsprintedbeforeanyofthesemengottogetherwiththebooksellingcompanytoevendiscussarevision(seetheBibleBeliever’sCommentarySeriesonActs,GenesisandProverbs,theChristian’sHandbookofManuscriptEvidence,andSatan’sMasterpiece,theNewASV,allpublishedbefore1975).

SincethepromotersofthisAtheniangimmickliketotalkaboutthe“DISTINCTIVE

Page 24: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

FEATURES”oftheNew“KingJames”Version,wewilltakethelibertytolistafewofthemourselves.Thesearethereal“DISTINCTIVEFEATURES”oftheKingJamesPerversion.

1.The“thees”and“thous”havebeeneliminatedsotheywillnotmatchtheHYMNALSusedinthechurchesofover5000Bible-believingpastors.Furthermore,thetranslatorsthemselveshavenotchangedthe“thees”and“thous”inthehymnalsoftheirOWNchurches.Theirdoublestandardofhypocrisyinthesemattersistooembarrassingtodiscuss:theywantBiblereaderstogetusedtospeakinginalanguagethatDIFFERSFROMTHEIRSONGSOFPRAISETOGOD.

CouldanythingbemoreirreverentandSTUPID?

2.TheLiberalmethodofforcingtheProphetstobePOETICinsteadofLITERALhasbeenaugmentedbywritingpageafterpageofIsaiah,EzekielandJeremiahinBLANKVERSEinsteadofasdocumentedstatementsonthetruth.OnewillfindthatthismethodwasusedbytheRSVoftheNCCCin1952anditwasusedbytheASVof1901.ThereareNOEDITIONSOFANYAUTHORIZEDVERSIONIN300YEARSTHATRESORTTOTHISALEXANDRIANALLEGORICALEXPEDIENT.

3.Aprominent“distinctivefeature”aboutthe1982Nelson-Hindson-FarstadfiascoisthecarefulattentionthatsomeonehasgiventoeveryversethatdealswithpeoplewhousethewordofGodasatoolandcorruptittomakealiving.Theseversesare1Timothy6:5,10,20andRomans1:18,25;16:18and2Corinthians2:17.Isitnotaremarkableand“DISTINCTIVEFEATURE”ofthisversionthatsomeonecouldnotleaveonesingleverseinthosepassagesasitwasfoundin1611,1613,1640,1680,1700,1715,1739,1759,1780,1835,1900,1930,1960,and1980?

Wouldn’tyoucallthat“highlydistinctive”?

4.Butbyfarthemost“distinctivefeature”oftheFalwell-Farstad-Hindsonversionistheopinionofthetranslatorsaboutthemselvesandtheirspirituality.EntirelyUNLIKEtheAVcommitteeof1611,these1982stuffedshirtssaythattheyhave“giventhemselvesdiligentlytotheHIGHESTSTANDARDSofscholarshipandTHOROUGHRESEARCH.”Idon’trecallanyoneontheAVcommitteebeingstupidenoughtobraglikethatabouttheirownwork.

“WehaveagainandagainbeenmadeawarethatGODWASATWORKAMONGUS,impartingtousasmallmeasureofHISINFINITEWISDOM”(p.1).

My,whataprofession!Idon’trecalltheAVtranslatorsmakinganyprofessionlikethatatall.Why,thatisascloseasyoucancometosayingthatGodtheHolySpiritwasINSPIRINGTHEWORDSYOUWROTE.Ofcoursetheydon’tsaythat,butthecontextof“God’sbeingatworkAMONGUS”is“whenithasbeennecessarytospenddaysorevenweeksweighingaSINGLEWORD…”

My,My,whathavewehere?

Godimpartedwisdomtothiscommitteeinweighingindividualwords!ToobadHedidn’tin1611,ehwhat?

Mywhata“DISTINCTIVEFEATURE”!Herearemenwholimittheirtime(sevenyears)

Page 25: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

totheexactnumberusedbythecommittee(1604-1611)soyouwillthinktheyareengagedinthesameactivity;then,afterreadingallof“Ruckman’sstuff”abouttheAVtranslatorsbeing“led”intheirchoiceofwords,thesameprofessionismade,whiletheseincrediblephoniesclaim“theSAMESPIRITOFOPENNESSANDACCOUNTABILITY”thatisin“KEEPINGWITHTHETRADITIONOFTHEFIRSTKINGJAMESVERSION”(p.1).

Welltheyweighed“corrupt”in2Corinthians2:17andthrewitoutlestsomeonewouldthinkthereferencewastothem.Theyweighedtheword“science”in1Timothy6:20andthrewitoutsinceitwas“archaic”(!).Theyweighedtheword“child”inActs4:27anddecideditpointedouttheDeityofChristtooclearly,soitwasthrownout.Theyweighedtheword“HUMBLED”inPhilippians2:7(1979edition)anddecidedtoaccepttheRSVword“emptied”oftheNCCCinitsplace.Theyweighedtheword“APPEARANCE”in1Thessalonians5:22andaltereditsoaChristiancouldappeartodoevilaslongashewasn’tdoingit,and….butwhygofurther?

Wehavehereenough“distinctives”toraiseafirstclass“stinct.”

“Vile”(alleditionsofanyAV)wastoostrongsoitwentoutofPhilippians2.“DUNG”wastoostrongsoitwentout.“SUPERSTITIOUS”wastoostrong(Acts17),soafter“carefullyweighingthesewords,”withGODWORKINGAMONGSTTHEM(!),andtheirthoroughresearchand“higheststandardsofscholarship,”theseblindguidesalteredtheAVtomatchtheRevisedStandardVersionoftheNationalCouncilofCommunistChurches(Weigle,Sockman,Dahlberg,Oxnam,Peale,thewholecrew).

Becauseoftheseandother“DISTINCTIVEFEATURES,”nohonest-to-God,real,BiblebelieversinAmericawouldrecommendtheFalwell-NelsonversiontoANYONE.Themotiveforitspublicationwasmonetary;theprofessionofitstranslatorswasegotistical;theirclaimstofidelityarefalse;theirprofessionoffaithintheScripturesisfalse;thereadingsoftheirtextarenotthereadingsofANYAuthorizedVersion;andtheirtacticsandapproachinsellingtheirproductbetraytheir“company”(1Cor.15:33);theyarethebacksliddenapostatesofLaodiceawhohavemistakenincomeandattendancefor“godliness,”scholarshipanddisciplineforintelligence,andprofessionsforHONESTY.BytheGraceofGodwewillnevermakeTHOSEmistakes.

Page 26: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

7.ACritiqueoftheNew“KingJames”Bible

InthisarticleweshallusethelettersJFVforthe“JerryFalwellVersion”(sincehehasbeenthe“kingpin”sotospeakinthepromotionofthisnewestAtheniangimmick)andalongsideitweshallputwhatALLEDITIONSOFTHEKINGJAMESVERSIONSAYFROM1611to1982andcomparethemwiththeJFVwhichprofessestobeoneinaseriesof“editions”ofthattext.Sothatthereaderwillberootedandgroundedinscientificdocumentedfact,wewillplaceaftertheJFVitsmatchmateintheCommunistversionputoutbytheNationalCouncilofChurches(Sockman,Weigle,Albright,Peale,Kagawa,Niebhur,Tillich,Dahlberg,etc.),theRSVof1952;andwewillalsoputthematchmatefoundintheapostateASV(1901)sothatyoucanseethatthislatestficklefadwasforthepurpose(again!)ofrestoringthebankruptASVof1901whichChristianscholarstriedtopawnoffonthepublicforfifteenyears.(Whentheygaveup,theytriedtopawnoffa“New”ASVandthisfailedsomiserablythattheJFVhadtoberesortedto.)AmongthemenresponsibleforthisnewCommunist“KingJames”BibleareRev.A.V.Henderson(pastorofTempleBaptistChurch,Detroit)andCurtisHutson(theSwordoftheLord).Maytheyrestinpeace.

SincethemotivebehindallEnglishtranslationworksince1884hasbeensales,weshouldnaturallyturnto1Timothy6:10(Fortheloveofmoneyisarootofallkindsofevil….—NKJV)andfindtheASVreadingof1901standingintheJFV.NoeditionoftheAV1611everhadsuchareadinginit.Ihavea1611anda1613editionrighthereinmyoffice.NoteventheCommunistBibleoftheNCC(RSV)isthatfaroffoftheAVreading.

SinceallrevisorswhocorruptthewordofGoddosowithabadconscience,notoneofthemcouldevertoleratetheAVreading(inalleditionsfrom1611to1982)in2Corinthians2:17.ForthisreasonwefindtheJerryFalwellVersionhasadoptedthereadingoftheliberalsintheNCC(RSV)whichhappenstobethereadingofthebankruptASVthatcamefromtheWestcottandHortGreek(Forwearenot,assomany,peddlingthewordofGod…—NKJV).

SinceallmenengagedinpervertingthetruthofGodarehighlysusceptibletotheirdepravity,wewouldexpectRomans1tolandontheperverterwithtremendousforce.Itdoes.AlleditionsoftheAVfrom1611-1982readcontrarytotheJerryFalwellVersioninRomans1:18(ForthewrathofGodisrevealedfromheavenagainstallungodlinessandunrighteousnessofmen,whosuppressthetruth…—NKJV)and1:25(WhoexchangedthetruthofGodforthelie…—NKJV).HereFalwellandhisfriendsareagainpromotingthereadingsoftheNationalCouncilofCommunistChurchesastheytranslateditintheRSV.Thewords“suppress”and“exchange”havebeenthrustintothecorrecttexttocoverthesinsofthetranslatorwho“CHANGEDTHETRUTH”and“HELDTHETRUTHINUNRIGHTEOUSNESS.”TheASVnaturallyagreeswiththeliberalsandmodernistsintheNCCC.

SinceallmodernapostatefundamentaliststhinkthatscienceismorevaluablethantheAVof1611(oratleastcansitinjudgmentonit),theword“science”hasbeenremovedfrom1Timothy6:20(…avoidingtheprofaneandvainbabblingsandcontradictionsofwhatisfalselycalledknowledge—NKJV)tomatchtheCommunistBibleoftheNCCCandthe

Page 27: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

apostateNASVofBobJonesUniversity.Theword“SCIENCE”wasfoundinalleditionsoftheAVfrom1611to1982.

Sincemoney-madapostateswhoareengagedinpervertingthewordofGodarebasicallymaterialistswhojudgesuccessorfailureintheministrybysales,enrollment,incomeorattendance,theywouldnaturallyhaveaheartattackat1Timothy6:5.Sosaid,sodone.TocoverupthetracksofpeoplelikemodernChristiancelebritiesandmonumentbuilders,theJFVhaspervertedtheversesothatyouwouldnotthinkthatsomeChristiansbelieve“THATGAINISGODLINESS”(…Whosupposethatgodlinessisameansofgain–NKJV).TheverseintheJFVhasbeenbroughtintolinewiththeliberalBiblepublishedbyunsavedmodernistsintheNationalCouncilofChurches.NaturallytheASVof1901readswithJerryFalwell’sVersionandDeanLutherWeigle’sVersion(RSV).

SincenomodernapostateunderstandstheChristianbeing“INCHRIST’SSTEAD”andbeing“ASHEIS,”theterm“PERSONOFCHRIST”in2Corinthians2:10hadtobedoneawaywith.ThepurposeforthiswastoerasethecrossreferencetoJohn20:23wheretheHolySpiritinterpretedthepassageinthatfashioninALLEDITIONSOFTHEKINGJAMESBIBLEFROM1611to1982.TheJFVisnotaneditionoftheAuthorizedVersion.JFV’sreadingin2Corinthians2:10(WhomIhaveforgivenIhaveforgivenitforyoursakesinthepresenceofChrist—NKJV)isthereadingofmodernistsandliberalsintheNCCCandwasfirstusedintheASVof1901.

MovinginascloseaspossibletotheRSVreadingofGalatians5:4,“YouareSEVEREDfromChrist”(whichimpliestheywerejoinedtoHimatonetime,whichtheywerenot:seethecontext),theJFVsays,“YOUHAVEBECOMEESTRANGEDFROMCHRIST”(implyingtheywerenotstrangers,whenEphesians9:19;2:12saystheyWERE).

ToprotecttheirownphonyGreekscholarship,theAthenianant-eaters(seecommentsonActs17inTheBibleBeliever’sCommentaryonActs,1972)haveinsertedtheRSVreadingoftheNationalCouncilofCommunistChurchesintoActs17:22(Iperceivethatinallthingsyouareveryreligious—NKJV).Theword“superstitious”(nooneismoresuperstitiousthanconservativeandevangelicalGreekscholars!)wastoostrongfortheirstomachssotheyalteredittomatchthewordsofthemodernistsandliberalswhomitscaldedfirst.JFVherereadswiththeRSVandtheASV.Itisnotan“edition”oftheAVinanysenseoftheword.

In1Corinthians1:22(FortheJewsrequestasign—NKJV)theignoranceofthecommitteeshowsthroughbeautifully.HerewearetoldthattheJewsdonotreallyREQUIREasign:theysimply“request”one.AnyfoolwhoreadExodus4knowsthenationalhistoryoftheJewsbeganwithSIGNSandthat,therefore,theyhavearighttorequireasign.ThatiswhyChristDIDTHOSESIGNSAMONGTHEM(John12)andwentevenfurtherandgavethoseSIGNStoHissuccessorsafterHisresurrection(Mark16).TheJFVreadswiththeASV,althoughthatcorruptcounterpartsays“ASKS”insteadof“REQUESTS.”Neitherreadinghasanythingtodowithsounddoctrine,BiblicalinterpretationorBiblicalaccuracy.

SinceallLaodiceanapostatesthinkexactlyalike(fundamentalistsandconservativesforemost),wewouldnaturallyimmediatelyturnto2Timothy2:15,forthisistheverseintheBiblethatshowstheChristianHOWTOSTUDYTHATVERYBOOK.TheJFVhas

Page 28: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

thrownawaythekeyandgottenridofthescripturalwaytostudytheBiblebyadoptingtheCommunistreadingoftheRSV,“BEDILIGENTTOPRESENTYOURSELF”(RSV,“DOYOURBESTTOPRESENTYOURSELF”)andsimplyomitstheword“STUDY.”Thereisno“STUDY”intheJFVversion;neitheristhereintheASVof1901northeNASVof1960.

PerhapsthecrummiestthingaboutthisNewAmerican,NewKing,NewStandard,NewJamesRat’sNestisthepromotionalmaterialwhichtellsthesuckerthatthisversionwill“UNLOCKTHESPIRITUALTREASURESFOUNDUNIQUELYINTHEKINGJAMESVERSION.”Othergaffedactsarepromotionalmaterialwhichimpliesthatfor371yearsnoonecouldreallyfindthesetruths.ToemphasizethisSatanicnonsense,Falwellissendingoutacopyofthe1611Versionwithhisnew“rat’snest”toconvincethegulliblethat:

1.Thelanguagehadneverbeenupdatedwhenithad.

2.ThattheAVincludedtheApocryphaaspartoftheBible,whichitdidn’t.

3.Andthatsincethereader’sstandardAV(publishedanywherebetween1613and1982)doesn’tMATCHthe1611VERBATIM,theJFVhasthelicensetoreinsertthereadingsintoitoftheNationalCouncilofLiberalandModernistChurcheswhoneveracceptedANYBibleasthewordofGod.AtthecloseoftheIntroduction(p.v)isthestandardgirlscoutprofessionofthebrowniesinLaodicea(seedetailsinProblemTexts,1980).AllprofessthattherewasaBook(Bible)onearththathad“ORIGINALAUTOGRAPHS”init.

Noonebutamadmanwouldbelievethat.TherehasneverbeenonthisearthANY“BIBLE”thatcontainedtheoriginalautographsofMoses,David,Isaiah,PaulandLuke.TheprofessionisablatantLIEbymenwhohavebeenconditionedtolieandteachliestoothersinthenameof“FUNDAMENTALISM.”TheseapostatefundamentalistshavesimplyreinsertedtheASVreadingsandRSVreadingsintothe“AuthorizedText”andpretendedthattheywereengagedinthesamekindofworkasthatdonebythetranslatorsof1611andthe“revisors”of1613.Theyarenot.TheyarecorruptersofthepureBreadofLifein:

Acts17:16(provoked)—…hisspiritwasprovokedwithinhimwhenhesawthatthecitywasgivenovertoidols.

Acts17:22(theAreopagas,religious)—ThenPaulstoodinthemidstoftheAreopagasandsaid,“MenofAthens,Iperceivethatinallthingsyouareveryreligious.

2Corinthians5:17(creation)—Therefore,ifanyoneisinChrist,heisanewcreation.

Philippians2:7(anattackontheDeityofChrist[emptied])—ButemptiedHimselfbytakingtheformofaservant….(ThisversehasbeenchangedagaininlatereditionsoftheNKJV.)

Acts4:27(anattackontheDeityofChrist:seecommentsinThebibleBeliever’sCommentaryonActs,1972)—FortrulyagainstyourholyServantJesus….

1Thessalonians5:22(no“appearance”)—Abstainfromeveryformofevil.

Matthew20:20(attackontheDeityofChrist:“worshipping”hasbeenomitted)—Thenthe

Page 29: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

motherofZebedee’ssonscametoHimwithhersons,kneelingdownandaskingsomethingfromHim.

James5:16(ahalfwaymovehasbeenmadetotheRomanCatholicsbyusingTRESPASSES)—Confessyourtrespassesonetoanother….

2Thessalonians2:7(Theword“he”hasbeencapitalizedtoforceuponthereadertheprivateinterpretationthatthe“HE”hasbeencapitalizedtoforceuponthereadertheprivateinterpretationthatthe“HE”ofthatpassageistheThirdPersonoftheTrinity)—Forthemysteryoflawlessnessisalreadyatwork;onlyHewhonowrestrainswilldosountilHeistakenoutoftheway.

NorealBiblebelievercouldbefooledbytheJerryFalwellVersion,otherwiseknownastheNewAmerican,NewKing,NewStandard,NewJames,NewRAT’SNEST(theNewKingJamesBible).

ItisaLaodiceanmonstrosity,andtheincredibleprofessionofthe“scholarlyteam”(seetheirIntroduction,p.30)isthatforthefirsttimein371yearstheKingJamesBibleisabletospeakGod’seternalTRUTHSWITHCLARITY.ThishorrendousLIEiswordedasfollowsonpage1oftheirIntroduction,“THEFIRSTKINGJAMESVERSIONOFTHEHOLYBIBLEWASPUBLISHEDIN1611…NOWALMOST371YEARSLATERTHATA.V.HASBEENCAREFULLYUPDATED”(READINGSOFTHERSVANDASVINSERTED!!)“SOTHATITWILLONCEAGAINSPEAKGOD’SETERNALTRUTHSWITHCLARITY.”

Wewillstickwithour“old”KingJamesVersionthathasservedussowell.

Page 30: About The New King James Version - soulwinning.info · 1. Why No Honest Christian Ever Recommends the New “King James” Version The following tractus is written to expose the most

8.TheCreedoftheAlexandrianCult

1.ThereisnofinalabsoluteauthoritybutGod.

2.SinceGodisaSpirit,thereisnofinalabsoluteauthoritythatcanbeseen,heard,read,felt,orhandled.

3.Sinceallbooksarematerial,thereisnobookonthisearththatisthefinalandabsoluteauthorityonwhatisrightandwhatiswrong;whatconstitutestruthandwhatconstituteserror.

4.ThereWASaseriesofwritingsonetimewhich,IFtheyhadallbeenputintoaBOOKassoonastheywerewrittenthefirsttime,WOULDHAVEconstitutedaninfallibleandfinalauthoritybywhichtojudgetruthanderror.

5.However,thisseriesofwritingswaslostandtheGodwhoinspiredthemwasunabletopreservetheircontentthroughBible-believingChristiansatAntioch(Syria)wherethefirstBibleteacherswere(Acts13:1)andwherethefirstmissionarytriporiginated(Acts16:1-6)andwherethewordCHRISTIANoriginated(Acts11:26).

6.SoGodchosetoALMOSTpreservethemthroughGnosticsandphilosophersfromAlexandria,Egypt,eventhoughGodcalledHisSonOUTofEgypt(Matt.2),JacobOUTofEgypt(Gen.49),IsraelOUTofEgypt(Exod.15),andJoseph’sbonesOUTofEgypt(Exod.13).

7.So,therearetwostreamsofBibles:themostaccurate—though,ofcourse,thereisnofinal,absoluteauthorityfordeterminingtruthanderror;itisamatterof“preference”—aretheEgyptiantranslationsfromAlexandria,Egypt,thatare“almost”the“originals,”althoughnotquite.

8.ThemostinaccuratetranslationsarethosethatbroughtabouttheGermanReformation(Luther,Zwingli,Boehler,Zinzendorf,Spener,etc.)andtheworldwidemissionarymovementoftheEnglishspeakingpeople:theBiblethatSunday,Torrey,Moody,Finney,Spurgeon,Whitefield,Wesley,andChapmanused.

9.Butwecan“tolerate”theseifthosewhobelieveinthemwilltolerateUS.Afterall,sincethereisNOABSOLUTEANDFINALAUTHORITYthatanyonecanread,teach,preach,orhandle,thewholethingisamatterof“PREFERENCE.”Youmaypreferwhatyouprefer,andwepreferwhatweprefer.Letusliveinpeace,andifwecannotagreeonanythingoreverything,letusallagreeononething:THEREISNOFINAL,ABSOLUTEWRITTENAUTHORITYOFGODANYWHEREONTHISEARTH.

ThisisthecreedoftheAlexandrianCult.