about amputation.docx

Purpose and function of arm and hand i.e. prehensile and non prehensile activities, expression and culture

Our hands are unique and versatile and our arms are there to support and place them wherever they need to be. Hands are used to

Stabilise

Manipulate

Discover (stereognosis)

Express

Stabilise Hands are used in open or closed position to push objects away and to protect e.g. opening a

door or pushing branches aside

As a lever to lean on to stabilise ourselves for a task

To arrange objects in our environment such as pushing and pulling objects around on a desk

With our fingers to press switches and manage our electronic media. The length or our arm is significant here

Manipulate When manipulating objects bimanually one hand is static and the other is the active

manipulator for example holding a box in one hand and opening the catch and the lid with the other

The range of grasps we have within the hand utilise the different positions of the thumbo there is the pinch and tripod grips for fine tasks

o key grip for thin flat objects

o power grip for grasping handle

o spherical grip for round objects. There are also combination of grips within the one hand e.g. using a computer mouse. Then there is the fluid movement of the hand through all these positions and the interweaving of both hands within the same activity

Discover (stereognosis) Discovery and exploration is to be able to know what is in the hand by grasping and releasing

again and again, or by running a finger over the surface. E.g. putting you hand in a pocket and pulling out only the desired object

Expression Our arms and hands are an extension of our thoughts and feelings - to gesture as you speak,

or rather not speak and merely gesture. To touch another is a gesture of concern or love

Culture Hand use and specific gestures take on considerable significance in certain cultures. The most

common popular belief about hands, for instance in Hindu, Islam, and some African cultures, is to consider the left hand as “unclean” and reserved solely for “hygienic” reasons, while it is thought culturally imperative to use the right hand for offering, receiving, eating, for pointing at something or when gesticulating [2]. In the Sikh and Hindu cultures, a specific cultural meaning is given to the habit of folding hands together either as a form of greeting, as well as in prayer[2].

Hand washing is also closely connected with religious practice in the Islamic faith in particular.

Causes of amputation such as punishment for theft, or occurred as a war injury can incur an additional stigma and psychological issues.

Products and services are generally designed assuming two-handed and right-handed users.

Causes and incidence of upper limb amputation (United Kingdom)[3]. (NB University of Salford now holds more recent UK statistics but reports available at cost only).

The most common cause of amputation in the UL amputee is trauma. Amputation may happen as part of the trauma itself. In some cases where limb salvage and reconstructive surgery has not achieved a successful outcome, elective amputation may be performed e.g. where trauma is associated with a totally avulsed brachial plexus, amputation may be a choice where the arm remains flail and insensate.

Persons with amputations as a result of infection (e.g. meningococcal septicaemia) may have multiple amputations involving the UL and LL.

In the UK, persons with UL amputation account for approximately 5% of the total UK amputee population. Unlike LL amputees, most UL amputees are in the younger age group reflecting the aetiology of the condition.

54% Trauma

14% Neoplasia

12% Dysvascularity

6% Infection

2% Neurological disorder

12% Other

<1% No cause provided

However, in middle and low income countries the incidence of traumatic UL amputation is higher.The figures below reflect the total numbers recorded of acquired UL loss in the UK in the year 2004-2005

Total no. new referrals to UK prosthetic centres = 280

Male (184):Female (95) (unspecified 1)

49 amputees >65 years were referred

Bilateral UL amputees: 9

Levels of amputation

Limb salvage and assessment – considerations Assessment principles – pre and post-amputation – will align with those of the LL amputee

In cases of trauma where there is no amputation as a consequence of the trauma, the MESS[4] or TRISS [5] scoring will be applied to assess potential for successful reconstruction of the limb.Mangled extremity severity score (MESS)[4] Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score (TRISS)[6] 

Where limb salvage and reconstruction is not indicated a thorough pre-amputation assessment should be performed

Assessment may take place in cases where limb salvage has not succeeded in restoring a functional extremity and an elective amputation is to be performed; or in the case of a peripheral nerve injury where nerve recovery is insufficient and the arm is insensate and functionless

An MDT approach to decision making and preparation for amputation is recommended as with the LL amputee[7].

It can be helpful for the person and the MDT in terms of agreeing goals of treatment if the OT and Physiotherapy can jointly assess

Associated injuries in relation to cause of amputation or potential amputation must be assessed and may require additional specialist expertise e.g. peripheral nerve injury

o Peripheral nerve injury – traumatic injury of the UL can be associated with PNI

o Assessment will include the use of EMG to identify and classify the extent and type of nerve damage e.g. neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis (in order of increasing severity)

o The extent of damage can influence the decision to avoid amputation, amputate early or defer e.g. in case of brachial plexus injury, amputation surgery may be delayed for up to 2 years to determine full nerve recovery and functional return[8].

Advantages and disadvantages of different levels of amputation

The tables below provide a broad overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the different levels of amputation including partial hand amputation (PH).

Table 1

Table 2

Subjective assessment

History of present condition Nature of injury or pathology and reason for amputation e.g. trauma, tumour, congenital

deformity, infection

Current and past functional ability e.g. self-care, mobility, activities of daily living

Co-morbidities and concurrent pathologies/ injuries associated e.g. multiple limb loss, PNI

History of investigations/ surgery prior to amputation

Past and relevant medical history Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis– limitations of movement, pain or weakness; remaining

hand function will be important for performing PADL and ADL

THREAD (Thyroid disorders, Heart problems, Rheumatoid arthritis, Epilepsy, Asthma or other respiratory problems, Diabetes)

Cardiac history / exercise tolerance

Smoking/ alcohol history

Vision and hearing

Pain Pattern of pain in affected arm

Pain elsewhere e.g. associated trauma, co-morbidities, remaining arm

Residual limb pain and/ or phantom limb pain will influence participation in rehab and independence with functional activities and prosthetic use

A common cause of pain in the remaining arm is through overuse

Drug history Pain relief

Other

Psychosocial factors Social support i.e. family members, neighbours, community

Social participation prior to amputation

Home e.g. accommodation, flat, house, stairs

Occupation, school, study

Interests and hobbies

Driving and transport

If the UL loss is associated with an accident, were others injured, RIP?

Cognition

Mood/ motivation/ mental health status, presentation e.g. posture, willingness to engage with history taking and assessment process, reaction towards prospective amputation or amputation

o The hand is a significant factor in body image, personality, independence and livelihood[9]

o The loss of an arm can have considerable psychological consequences

8The cultural impact of upper limb loss may have a profound effect on a person’s independence, participation and status within a society

8Children as they become older, will be increasingly aware of their disability and are susceptible to psychological difficulties e.g. body image, participation physically and socially. Parents and families also require support. Establishing links early with family support services and prosthetic services – with the opportunity to meet peers of a similar age with limb loss – is highly recommended

o Sense of loss, bereavement for the limb and life as they knew it before.

o The 5 stages are denial and isolation, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance

Objective assessment

Range of movement and muscle strength Cervical and thoracic spine, the shoulder girdle and all joints proximal to amputation level in

both armso Restricted movement and muscle strength can limit function and predispose to

postural and gait deviationso In the bilateral UL amputee the neck, hips, knees and feet will be used in ADLs and

PADLs

Soft tissue – intact skin cover, sensation, scarring, burns

ROM, muscle strength of remaining armo E.g. manual dexterity of the ‘sound’ is critical as it will become dominant

Balance, posture and gait In sitting, standing, walking and turning

Postural asymmetry e.g. reduced muscle bulk, tone, scapular elevation, retractiono Restricted balance and proprioception can limit function and predispose to postural

and gait deviations; the impact of bilateral UL loss on balance should not be underestimated

o The most common postural deviation observed in the UL amputee is scapular elevation and protraction, internal rotation and adduction of the gleno-humeral joint, restricted cervical rotation and side flexion , kyphotic posture with pocking chin (see figure 2)

o In walking arm swing can be reduced and accompanied by thoracic side flexion to the amputated side

Figure 2 

Hand dominance, function and testing of ADLs PADL and ADL

o In the case of the single UL amputee the remaining arm will become the dominant arm

o Dexterity and ability of the remaining arm to perform functional tasks and personal activities of daily living

o Ability of the lower limbs to assist in functional activities

Considerations for pre-operative physiotherapy (where possible) Explore the opportunity to meet with another with the same level to inform, demonstrate and

reassure. As with the LL amputee, source local prosthetic centres or national organisations (Limbless Association)

Where possible, an appointment to be seen and assessed by a specialist prosthetic MDT at a regional rehabilitation centre can provide the opportunity to meet with an other UL amputee/s, to see and gain facts about appropriate prostheses and prosthetic use

Otherwise, early liaison with prosthetic centre to gain advice. Be cautious with patient expectations of prosthetic use

Discuss pain relief and potential for pain post operatively, phantom limb sensation (PLS) and phantom limb pain (PLP)

Plan pre and postoperative physiotherapy intervention through agreeing realistic short term goals

Situation permitting, maintain and/ or increase proximal joint ROM and muscle strength both arms

In anticipation of transhumeral prosthetic use incorporate scapular movement e.g. protraction and retraction

Introduce functional activities in the ‘dominant’ arm and lower limbs

Advice on posture, teach and correct

Concurrent treatment

Post amputation and pre-prosthetic rehabilitation

Assessment post amputation should include information about the quality of the residual limb/ residuum (stump) as this will have an impact on the prosthetic rehabilitation potential for the patient

Wound condition

Oedema

Residual limb length

Soft tissue cover

Cut end of bone (prominent or not)

Shape

Sensation

Position of suture line, adherence

Pain

The principles of wound care, oedema control, pain management will align to that of the LL. Similarly, emotional support, goal planning. Where possible there should be close working with the OT

Oedema controlo Elevation e.g. at rest on a pillow with the distal end at a higher level than the shoulder;

supported via a drip stand when walking

o Compression via compression shrinker sock or elastic bandage

o Active exercises

Pain managemento Encourage residual limb handling & desensitising – this can help adjustment to

changed body imageo Note that phantom limb sensation and pain can be more common in the UL; consider

the relative representation of the hand on the homunculus and proximity to the face. PLP experienced by the UL amputee can be associated with facial sensations

Emotional supporto MDT approach, onward referral for specialist support e.g. clinical psychologist,

counsellor

Patient and family /carer – as above

Discuss lifestyle, employment, hobbies and home situation

Discuss expectations of prosthesis

Agree goals for treatment

Physiotherapy specific Postural advice in sitting, standing and walking

Maintain and > proximal joint ROM & strengtho Encourage early active movement of all proximal joints from 1st day post amputation

o Resisted exercise as soon as pain allows

o Active ROM Cx and Tx spine

8GH joint – flex/ ext; abd/ add; ext rot/ int roto Scapula – depression/ elevation; protraction/ retraction

GH and scapula rhythm – NB protraction and flexion principle movement required for a body powered prosthesis

o Elbow – flex/ ext, pron/ sup

Physiotherapy treatment techniques includeo Mobilisations, stretches (see figure 3), auto resisted exercises, theraband

Figure 3

o Base on normal movement e.g. reach and grasp, PNF (see Figure 4)

Figure 4

o Proprioception for shoulder e.g. stabilisation exercises, 4 point kneeling, wobble

cushion, ballo Normalisation of residual limb sensation e.g. handling, exercises, loading (see Figure 5)

Figure 5

o Pilates & core stability

o Exercise leaflets e.g. core stability

o Incorporate prosthetic use into functional exercises at later stage based on normal movement (see figure 6)

Figure 6

o Apply ergonomics e.g. car, work station, sleep posture (see figure 7)

Figure 7

Encourage to use residual limb as much as possible with PADLs and ADLs

Use simple gauntlet to hold utensils, comb, toothbrush (see figure 8)

Figure 8

Encourage symmetry of movemento Avoid one handedness i.e. of remaining arm

Balance, gait and postureo Walk, run, turn

o Encourage arm swing and trunk rotation

Education and advice on prevention of problems e.g. of not moving or overuseo Stiff, shoulder pain, Cx & Tx pain, tenosynovitis. See below

o Functional limitations e.g. unable to wash axilla/ apply deodorant

Exercises for the dominant hando Hand mobility

o Writing (see figure 9)

o Dressing

Figure 9

Mobility, balance and functional activities for the bilateral UL amputee (see figures 10, 11)

Figure 10

Figure 11

Considerations for prosthetic rehabilitation (NB prosthetic rehabilitation is not covered in this chapter)

Motivation is essential if patients are planning to use a prosthesis. Amputees with lower limb loss often choose to wear prostheses but those with UL loss often don’t use prosthetic arms, especially children. Developing skills with a prosthesis is a bit like learning to ride a bike, once learnt it is easy to use later. It is advisable to encourage amputees to learn to use a prosthesis early and put in the time practise time required to be proficient. Once patients have found a way to do something and have adjusted to being without a hand there is less tendency to adapt to using a prosthesis. Early prosthetic use is recommended; amputees are more likely to adapt with the risks of becoming one handed and with less motivation to use a prosthesis. Early referral for prosthesis and rehabilitation is advised.

Seek out what the patient’s goal is

Identify the potential of the prosthesis that the client is due to receive, or is available, as it is and what could be added

Enabling the patient to put on and take off the prosthesis at will

Making sure that the fit of the prosthesis is not going to create harm by chaffing or pressing on hypersensitive locations. Check the skin before and after each session and teach the patient to know what to look for

That they can put clothes over the prosthesis easily. The prosthesis may not assist with putting on undergarments, but can assist with larger garments

Enable the patient to know how far they can reach, when wearing the prosthesis and still operate it. That they know where the prosthesis ends For example to enable patient to move around a crowded environment without knocking things in error

To be able to grasp and release a variety of objects at will, and with confidence

To be able to maintain a grasp while doing other activities eg walking around or talking. This sustained grip is ideally relaxed posture rather than global tension

Where there is a change in hand dominance it is necessary to do repetitive practice to develop ease of movement

Ultimately the prosthesis assumes the role of a tool and they are able to focus on the task and expression that they are engaged in. They are able to relate to other people on the basis of chosen activities and not that the prosthesis dominates their awareness

Common physical problems associated with UL loss – considerations

Injury and overuse in the remaining arm[10][11]  e.g. shoulder impingement, tenosynovitis, epicondylitis, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Asymmetry of posture due to reduced weight on one side of body e.g. neck & thoracic back pain

Long term amputees/ persons with congenital loss with long term habits, protective and postural changes e.g. tight anterior shoulder capsule, tight pecs & ant deltoid

Poor GHjt / scapula rhythm

Weak rotator cuff - subscap, infraspin, teres major & minor

Phantom pain. See pain chapter

Considerations for the child with UL amputation

Refer to the Association for Children with Upper Limb Deficiency

Children with an UL amputation may experience additional problems and challenge in relation to the cause of amputation and/ or as they grow older e.g. musculoskeletal pathologies

Regular review is essential to assess and treat symptomatically

Standards of practice

Refer to PIRPAG (Physiotherapy Interregional Prosthetic Audit Group) recommendations  

 Recommendations for practice from Roehampton Rehabilitation Centre

References

1. ↑  Atkins, D. J. Prosthetic Training. In: Smith, D, G., Michael, J.W and J. H. Bowker. Editors, 2004, Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies. 3rd Ed. American Acadamy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 World Health Organization. 2009. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care.

3. ↑  NASDAB (National Amputee Statistical Database) 2004-5 fckLRhttp://www.cofemer.fr/UserFiles/File/Amput2004_05.pdffckLRwww.nasdab.co.ukfckLRhttp://www.limbless-statistics.org/

4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Mangled extremity severity score (MESS) (Johnson et al 1990)http://www.mdcalc.com/mangled-extremity-severity-score-mess-score/

5. ↑  Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score (TRISS) (Boyd et al1987)http://www.trauma.org/index.php/main/article/387/

6. ↑  Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score (TRISS) (Boyd et al1987)http://www.trauma.org/index.php/main/article/387/

7. ↑  Broomhead P, Dawes D, Hancock A, Unia P, Blundell A, Davies V. 2006. Clinical fckLRguidelinesfor the pre and post operative physiotherapy management of adults with lower limb amputation. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Londonhttp://bacpar.csp.org.uk/publications/clinical-guidelines-pre-post-operativephysiotherapy-management-adults-lower-li

8. ↑  Shin, A, Y., Bishop, Al T and J. W. Michael. 2004. Brachial Plexus Injuries: Surgical and Prosthetic Management. In: Smith, D, G., Michael, J.W and J. H. Bowker. Editors, Atlas of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies. 3rd Ed. American Acadamy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

9. ↑  Carnegie F. 1999. Upper limb amputation and congenital limb deficiency. In Therapy for Amputees. Engstrom B and Van de Ven C. Churchill

10. ↑  Gambrell, C. 2008. Overuse Syndrome and the Unilateral Upper Limb Amputee: Consequences and Prevention. Journal of Prosthetics &amp;amp;amp; Orthotics. 20:126-132

11. ↑  Jones, L,E and J,H Davidson. 1999. Save that arm: a study of problems in the remaining arm of unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 23:55-58