Top Banner
ABCD, the Language of Replication Protein A (RPA) Ronald Wilson Reagan College Preparatory High School, Milwaukee Public Schools Caleb Anderson, Rohit Bhatia, Max Ehlers, Kiley Ledger, Hailey Lentz, Sage Marsh, Brenden McLaughlin Haralson, Samantha Pieper, Angelise Puls, Samia Sheikh, Amaya Smith, Max Spellecy, Mayumi Sweeney, Ah Yu Ya, Eliza Borysenko Teachers: Molly Schuld, Jose Perez Research Mentor Dr. Edwin Antony, Marquette University Replication Protein A (RPA) is a eukaryotic single stranded DNA binding protein that is required for DNA replication and repair. In the cell, RPA plays four important functions that are required for all DNA metabolism events including DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Functions i) RPA binds to ssDNA and protects it from being degraded; ii) RPA binds to over 30 different enzymes and recruits it to the ssDNA; iii) RPA informs the cell that ssDNA is present and thus signals the cell cycle checkpoint response; iv) RPA keeps the DNA from getting tangled. RPA binds tightly to ssDNA, but also has to give it away to other proteins for DNA maintenance in the cell. How this occurs is not understood. The current hypothesis is that each DNA binding domain can be individually remodeled by the interacting proteins. Since the overall function of RPA is to ensure that ssDNA is protected, defects in RPA function lead to genome instability and an accumulation of high frequency mutations. Thus, mutations in RPA lead to an increased likelihood of genetic mutations resulting in hereditary disorders and cancers. RPA binds to ssDNA and protects it from degradation. This is achieved through very tight interactions between RPA and ssDNA. RPA is made up of three subunits RPA70, RPA32 and RPA14. The protein can be further subdivided into unique DNA binding domains labeled: A (red), B (yellow), C (green), and D (blue) (Figure 1). The DNA binding domains are referred to as DBDs. DBD-C and DBD-D form the trimerization core with the RPA14 subunit (pink) and this holds all three subunits of RPA together. RPA also includes domain E (pink) and domain F (N-terminus) that do not bind to ssDNA (purple), but instead interact with other proteins. If one were to think of the domains as ‘fingers in a hand’, then the strength of RPA comes from the fingers working together to tightly hold on to the DNA. If RPA needs to be removed from ssDNA, it might be easier to remove one ‘finger’ at a time. In conclusion, RPA is a crucial protein that binds and protects the ssDNA and also communicates with other DNA repair processes to ensure that DNA doesn’t become mutated or damaged. RPA consists of multiple domains. The data shows that DBD-A binds the fastest, but also falls off rapidly. Hence it is in a highly dynamic state. DBD-D is more stable on the DNA. The binding/dissociation of other DBDs are currently being investigated. In the future, the investigators will explore how the dynamics of these DBDs are altered by enzymes that displace RPA from ssDNA. RPA is relevant to current medical studies because the information regarding the speed at which each DBD binds to the DNA provides possible insight to treatment of genetic mutations, such as cancer. References Fan, J., Pavletich, N.P., 2012. Structure and conformational change of a replication protein A heterotrimer bound to ssDNA. Genes. Dev. 26, 2337e2347. Sugitani N, Chazin WJ (2015) Characteristics and concepts of dynamic hub proteins in DNA processing machinery from studies of RPA. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 117:206–211 Pokhrel, et. al. (2017) Monitoring Replication Protein A (RPA) dynamics in homologous recombination through site-specific incorporation of non-canonical amino acids. Nucleic Acids Research 45(16):9413-9426 Introduction Introduction Molecular Story Molecular Story Figure 1: A diagram of RPA showing the three subunits: RPA70, RPA 32 and RPA14, and the individual DNA binding domains Figure 1: A diagram of RPA showing the three subunits: RPA70, RPA 32 and RPA14, and the individual DNA binding domains Figure 2: A Jmol model of RPA (4GNX) Figure 2: A Jmol model of RPA (4GNX) Summary Summary Acknowledgements The MSOE Center for BioMolecular Modeling would like to acknowledge and thank the National Institutes of Health Science Education Partnership Award (NIH-SEPA 1R25OD010505-01) and the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (NIH-CTSA UL1RR031973) for their support in funding the 2017-2018 SMART Team program. Data presented here are unpublished work from a manuscript that is currently under review: Pokhrel N., Caldwell C., Corless E., Tillison E., Wold M.S., Spies M,, and Antony E. – Please contact Dr. Edwin Antony ([email protected]) for more information about the scientific aspects of the work. Funding for this research in Dr. Antony’s group is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health 7R15GM110671 Scientific Process Scientific Process Researchers are trying to find out which domain of RPA stays bound to ssDNA for the longest amount of time by measuring the strength and duration of each DBD using rapid kinetic tools such as the stopped flow analysis of RPA-DNA interactions. DBD-A and DBD-D were chemically modified using unnatural amino acids to carry a fluorophore, which was excited with a particular wavelength of light, so the emission could be captured in real-time using a stopped flow spectrophotometer (Figure 3). When a particular DBD is bound to the DNA, the fluorescence enhances. Monitoring the change in fluorescence as a function of time yields kinetic data, or how fast the DBDs bind to DNA. This information can be used to calculate the ON-rate and OFF-rate for each DBD. Data shows that DBD-A is very dynamic and falls off the DNA as soon as it binds to the DNA. DBD-D on the other hand is more stable on the DNA. Figure 3: Stopped Flow Instrument Figure 3: Stopped Flow Instrument Figure 4: Stopped Flow Experiments. A) Changes in DBD-A fluorescence upon binding to increasing amounts of ssDNA and its B) kinetic analysis. C) Similar stopped flow analysis of DBD- D binding to DNA and D) its kinetic analysis. E) and F) are models showing the binding properties of the individual DBDs of RPA. Figure 4: Stopped Flow Experiments. A) Changes in DBD-A fluorescence upon binding to increasing amounts of ssDNA and its B) kinetic analysis. C) Similar stopped flow analysis of DBD- D binding to DNA and D) its kinetic analysis. E) and F) are models showing the binding properties of the individual DBDs of RPA. e f DBD-B DBD-A Domain E DBD-D DBD-C ssDNA
1

ABCD, the Language of Replication Protein A (RPA)cbm.msoe.edu/images/contentImages/smartTeams/alumni/2017-18... · duration of each DBD using rapid kinetic tools such as the stopped

Jan 29, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ABCD, the Language of Replication Protein A (RPA)cbm.msoe.edu/images/contentImages/smartTeams/alumni/2017-18... · duration of each DBD using rapid kinetic tools such as the stopped

ABCD, the Language of Replication Protein A (RPA)Ronald Wilson Reagan College Preparatory High School, Milwaukee Public Schools

Caleb Anderson, Rohit Bhatia, Max Ehlers, Kiley Ledger, Hailey Lentz, Sage Marsh, Brenden McLaughlin Haralson,

Samantha Pieper, Angelise Puls, Samia Sheikh, Amaya Smith, Max Spellecy, Mayumi Sweeney, Ah Yu Ya, Eliza Borysenko

Teachers: Molly Schuld, Jose Perez

Research Mentor Dr. Edwin Antony, Marquette University

Replication Protein A (RPA) is a eukaryotic

single stranded DNA binding protein that is

required for DNA replication and repair. In the

cell, RPA plays four important functions that are

required for all DNA metabolism events

including DNA replication, recombination, and

repair.

Functions

i) RPA binds to ssDNA and protects it from

being degraded;

ii) RPA binds to over 30 different enzymes and

recruits it to the ssDNA;

iii) RPA informs the cell that ssDNA is present

and thus signals the cell cycle checkpoint

response;

iv) RPA keeps the DNA from getting tangled.

RPA binds tightly to ssDNA, but also has to

give it away to other proteins for DNA

maintenance in the cell. How this occurs is not

understood. The current hypothesis is that each

DNA binding domain can be individually

remodeled by the interacting proteins.

Since the overall function of RPA is to

ensure that ssDNA is protected, defects in RPA

function lead to genome instability and an

accumulation of high frequency mutations.

Thus, mutations in RPA lead to an increased

likelihood of genetic mutations resulting in

hereditary disorders and cancers.

RPA binds to ssDNA and protects it from

degradation. This is achieved through very tight

interactions between RPA and ssDNA. RPA is

made up of three subunits RPA70, RPA32 and

RPA14. The protein can be further subdivided into

unique DNA binding domains labeled: A (red), B

(yellow), C (green), and D (blue) (Figure 1). The

DNA binding domains are referred to as DBDs.

DBD-C and DBD-D form the trimerization core with

the RPA14 subunit (pink) and this holds all three

subunits of RPA together. RPA also includes

domain E (pink) and domain F (N-terminus) that do

not bind to ssDNA (purple), but instead interact with

other proteins. If one were to think of the domains

as ‘fingers in a hand’, then the strength of RPA

comes from the fingers working together to tightly

hold on to the DNA. If RPA needs to be removed

from ssDNA, it might be easier to remove one

‘finger’ at a time.

In conclusion, RPA is a crucial protein that binds and protects the ssDNA and also communicates

with other DNA repair processes to ensure that DNA doesn’t become mutated or damaged. RPA consists

of multiple domains. The data shows that DBD-A binds the fastest, but also falls off rapidly. Hence it is in a

highly dynamic state. DBD-D is more stable on the DNA. The binding/dissociation of other DBDs are

currently being investigated. In the future, the investigators will explore how the dynamics of these DBDs

are altered by enzymes that displace RPA from ssDNA. RPA is relevant to current medical studies

because the information regarding the speed at which each DBD binds to the DNA provides possible

insight to treatment of genetic mutations, such as cancer.

References

Fan, J., Pavletich, N.P., 2012. Structure and conformational change of a replication protein A

heterotrimer bound to ssDNA. Genes. Dev. 26, 2337e2347.

Sugitani N, Chazin WJ (2015) Characteristics and concepts of dynamic hub proteins in DNA

processing machinery from studies of RPA. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 117:206–211

Pokhrel, et. al. (2017) Monitoring Replication Protein A (RPA) dynamics in homologous

recombination through site-specific incorporation of non-canonical amino acids. Nucleic

Acids Research 45(16):9413-9426

IntroductionIntroduction Molecular StoryMolecular Story

Figure 1: A diagram of RPA showing the three subunits:

RPA70, RPA 32 and RPA14, and the individual DNA

binding domains

Figure 1: A diagram of RPA showing the three subunits:

RPA70, RPA 32 and RPA14, and the individual DNA

binding domains

Figure 2: A Jmol model of RPA (4GNX)Figure 2: A Jmol model of RPA (4GNX)

SummarySummary

Acknowledgements

The MSOE Center for BioMolecular Modeling would like to acknowledge and thank the National

Institutes of Health Science Education Partnership Award (NIH-SEPA 1R25OD010505-01) and

the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (NIH-CTSA

UL1RR031973) for their support in funding the 2017-2018 SMART Team program.

Data presented here are unpublished work from a manuscript that is currently under review:

Pokhrel N., Caldwell C., Corless E., Tillison E., Wold M.S., Spies M,, and Antony E. – Please

contact Dr. Edwin Antony ([email protected]) for more information about the scientific

aspects of the work.

Funding for this research in Dr. Antony’s group is supported by a grant from the National Institutes

of Health 7R15GM110671

Scientific ProcessScientific Process

Researchers are trying to find out which domain of RPA stays bound to

ssDNA for the longest amount of time by measuring the strength and

duration of each DBD using rapid kinetic tools such as the stopped flow

analysis of RPA-DNA interactions.

• DBD-A and DBD-D were chemically modified using unnatural amino

acids to carry a fluorophore, which was excited with a particular

wavelength of light, so the emission could be captured in real-time

using a stopped flow spectrophotometer (Figure 3).

• When a particular DBD is bound to the DNA, the fluorescence

enhances.

• Monitoring the change in fluorescence as a function of time yields

kinetic data, or how fast the DBDs bind to DNA. This information can

be used to calculate the ON-rate and OFF-rate for each DBD.

• Data shows that DBD-A is very dynamic and falls off the DNA as

soon as it binds to the DNA. DBD-D on the other hand is more stable

on the DNA.

Figure 3: Stopped Flow InstrumentFigure 3: Stopped Flow Instrument

Figure 4: Stopped

Flow Experiments.

A) Changes in DBD-A

fluorescence upon

binding to

increasing

amounts of ssDNA

and its

B) kinetic analysis.

C) Similar stopped

flow analysis of DBD-

D binding to DNA and

D) its kinetic analysis.

E) and F) are models

showing the binding

properties of the

individual DBDs of

RPA.

Figure 4: Stopped

Flow Experiments.

A) Changes in DBD-A

fluorescence upon

binding to

increasing

amounts of ssDNA

and its

B) kinetic analysis.

C) Similar stopped

flow analysis of DBD-

D binding to DNA and

D) its kinetic analysis.

E) and F) are models

showing the binding

properties of the

individual DBDs of

RPA.

e

f

DBD-B

DBD-ADomain E

DBD-D

DBD-C

ssDNA