AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Product Overview 56 th Annual IHEEP September 2014
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Product Overview
56th Annual IHEEPSeptember 2014
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
AASHTOWareBridge Design
Formerly Opis
AASHTOWareBridge Rating
Formerly Virtis2
Product Organization
• Joint development efforts by AASHTO member agencies – began in the early 1990’s
• Pooling knowledge and resources of member agencies
• Products are administrated by AASHTO, managed by a Task Force and owned by members of AASHTO
• Products are verified and validated by member agencies
3
Task Force Members
• Todd Thompson South Dakota DOT - Chair• Dean Teal Kansas DOT• Jeff Olsen Montana DOT• Amjad Waheed Ohio DOT• Joshua Dietsche Wisconsin DOT
• Judy Skeen AASHTO Project Manager• Tom Saad FHWA Liaison
4
AASHTOWare Bridge DesignCurrent Participation
Manitoba, CanadaCountry
Agency Licenses = 20 Licensee
Map KeyConsultant Licensees = 35 Non- Licensee
5
AASHTOWare Bridge RatingCurrent Participation
Agency Licenses = 38 Licensee
Map KeyConsultant Licensees = 556 Non- LicenseeManitoba, Canada
Country
City/County/TerritoryPhoenix, AZPuerto Rico
6
Product Concept
AASHTOWareBridge
Database(Oracle or SQL Server)
BAR7Import
BARSImport
BRASSImport
Import Utilities
ASD
AASHTOWareDesign and Rating Engines
LFD
LRFR
Line GirderAnalysis
Specifications
Analysis
LRFD
3D Analysis
3rd-PartyEngine
3D CurvedAnalysis7
Product Concept
• Bridge Design and Bridge Rating share much of the same user interface
• Model data is preserved in the same database
• Modeling, analysis and reporting processes are independent of each other
• Design with Bridge Design Load rate with Bridge Rating using the same model
8
Design Use CasesInteractive design review and specification checking
9
Design Use CasesPreliminary and final design review
10
Design Use Cases
Comparison validation – Enter a bridge once and …
• Compare designs between different engines• Compare designs between different versions of the
LRFD specifications• Compare between 3D and Line Girder analyses
11
Rating Use CasesLoad rating common bridge types
12
Rating Use CasesSupport permit routing using the Application Program
Interface
Billerica
Carlisle
Concord
Burlington
Lexington
Lincoln
BedfordNorthRoad
CarlisleRoad
ConcordRoad
SpringsRoad
PineHill
Road
Old BillericaRoad
BurlingtonRoad
PageRoad
PageRoad
ShawsheenRoad
BrooksbieRoad
HartwellRoad
SouthRoad
SummerStreet
HartwellAvenue
The GreatRoad
BedfordRoad
GroveStreet
BedfordStreet
MiddlesexTurnpike
BurlingtonMall
4
4
225
225
62
62
62
3
3
128
128
13
Rating Use CasesLoad rating based on inspection results
14
Rating Use Cases
Comparison validation – Enter a bridge once and …
• Compare ratings between different engines• Compare ratings between different rating methods
(ASR, LFR and LRFR)• Compare ratings between different versions of the
MBE specifications• Compare between 3D and girder-line analysis
15
Capabilities – Two Superstructure Modeling Methods
System Definition
• System computed dead loads
• System computed live load distributed factors
Line Definition• User-defined dead loads
• User-defined live load distributed factors
16
Capabilities – Two Girder PropertyInput Methods
Cross Section Definition
1 2 3 4 5
1 3 42 5
Each plate is defined and located
Schedule Definition
17
Capabilities – Design and Rating Steel Girder Superstructures
• Rolled shapes
• Welded plate girders
• Built-up I shapes
18
Capabilities – Design and RatingP/S Concrete Superstructures
Precast shapes
• I beams
• Boxes
• Multi-stem Tee
• U beams
19
Capabilities – Design and RatingReinforced Concrete Superstructures
• Tee beams
• Slabs
• I beams
20
Capabilities – Design and RatingReinforced Concrete Multi-celled Box Superstructures
• LRFD/LRFR
• Line girder analysis, web-lines or full box
• User defined box cross sections
• Integral with pier
21
Capabilities – Design and RatingReinforced Concrete Slab System Superstructures
• LRFD/LRFR
• LFR/ASR
• User defined strip widths
• Solid and voided sections
• Integral with pier22
Capabilities – Design and RatingReinforced Concrete Box Culverts (LFR and LRFR)
• Sloping fill
• Multiple cells
• Optional bottom slab
• Optional haunches
23
Capabilities – Design and Rating3D Analysis
• For multi-girder straight and curvedsystem
• Automatic mesh generation with user controls
• Dead and Live loads
• Transverse live load analysis or user-defined vehicle loading path
24
Capabilities – DesignSubstructure
• Generation of load cases
• User-defined load cases
• LRFD load combinations
• LRFD spec-checking
Capabilities – DesignSubstructure
• Foundation Types:
• Spread Footing
• Pile Footing
• Single Drilled Shaft
Capabilities – RatingPost-Tensioned Concrete Multi-celled Box
Superstructures
• LRFR
• Line girder analysis, full box including web-lines
• User defined box cross sections
• Integral with pier27
Capabilities – RatingFloor Systems (ASR and LFR)
• Girder-Floorbeam-Stringer
• Truss-Floorbeam-Stringer
• Girder-Floorbeam
• Truss-Floorbeam
• Floorbeam-Stringer
28
Capabilities – RatingFloor Systems (ASR and LFR)
• Floor trusses
29
Capabilities – RatingTrusses (LFR)
• Continuous spans
• Suspended spans
• Counters
• Deck trusses
• Through trusses
30
Capabilities – RatingSawn Timber Superstructures (ASR)
• Includes deck rating
31
Capabilities – RatingAnalysis of nonstandard gage vehicles
• Unlimited number of axles
• Unlimited number of wheels per axle
• User-defined vehicle loading path
32
Capabilities – RatingRating with adjacent vehicles• Design review and
rating analyses
• User defined adjacent vehicle LL factor
• Live load distribution factor approach specified in LRFD Article 4.6.2.2.5
33
AASHTOWare Bridge Design and RatingContact InformationFeel free to contact us or visit our website for more information
Inquiries: Judy Skeen - AASHTO Project Manager(512) 963-1465
Support Email: [email protected]
Technical Support: http://aashto.mbakercorp.com
AASHTOWare: http://www.aashtoware.org
34