0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m) 1.95m - 2.50m (recovery of 0.55m) 3.45m - 4.30m (recovery of 0.85m) 4.40m - 6.00m (HQ Coring) BH3199 Perth GWR Stage 2 Revision Date Cad Reference A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846 GHD Pty Ltd GHD Pty Ltd 999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000 PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832 T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555 E [email protected]www.ghd.com.au Drawn Date Job Number A4 Title Client KT 12/10/2016 61/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION Checked Date Project Notes: - Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
218
Embed
A4 drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846 GHD Pty Ltd ... - Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only. 0.00m - 1.50m ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.95m - 2.50m (recovery of 0.55m)
3.45m - 4.30m (recovery of 0.85m)
4.40m - 6.00m (HQ Coring)
BH3199 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.20m - 1.50m (recovery of 0.30m)
1.95m - 2.65m (recovery of 0.70m)
BH3506 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.10m (recovery of 0.60m)
BH3824 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.25m (recovery of 0.35m)
BH4163 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.30m (recovery of 0.4m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATIONChecked Date
Project
12/10/2016
Perth GWR Stage 2A 12/10/2016
61/34889
Date Cad Reference BH4499Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Revision
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.40m (recovery of 0.5m)
BH4834 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.30m (recovery of 0.4m)
BH5172 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.50m (recovery of 0.6m)
BH5499 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.30m (recovery of 0.4m)
BH5846 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.95m - 2.35m (recovery of 0.4m)
BH6176 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.30m (recovery of 0.4m)
BH6509 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.40m (recovery of 0.5m)
BH6832 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 0.90m (recovery of 0.9m)
BH7185 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.20m (recovery of 0.3m)
BH6832 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.60m (recovery of 0.7m)
BH7858 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.60m (recovery of 0.7m)
BH8191 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.20m (recovery of 0.3m)
BH8554 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 12/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 12/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.20m (recovery of 0.3m)
3.40m - 3.90 (recovery of 0.5m)
4.95m - 5.85m (recovery of 0.9m)
BH8862 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.20m (recovery of 0.3m)
3.45m - 3.95 (recovery of 0.5m)
4.90m - 5.50m (recovery of 0.6m)
BH9266 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.30m (recovery of 0.4m)
BH9579 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.40m (recovery of 0.5m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH9894 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.95m - 2.20m (recovery of 0.25m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH10202 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.00m (recovery of 1.0m)
1.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 0.5m)
1.90m - 2.40m (recovery of 0.5m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH10589 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.80m - 3.00m (recovery of 1.2m)
3.45m - 4.50 (recovery of 1.05m)
4.95m - 5.65m (recovery of 0.7m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH10797 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.20m (recovery of 0.3m)
3.40m - 3.90 (recovery of 0.5m)
4.95m - 5.35m (recovery of 0.4m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH10979 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.25m (recovery of 0.35m)
3.40m - 4.00 (recovery of 0.6m)
4.95m - 5.60m (recovery of 0.65m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH11168 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.90m - 2.50m (recovery of 0.6m)
3.40m - 4.05 (recovery of 0.65m)
4.95m - 5.65m (recovery of 0.7m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH11228 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.95m - 2.40m (recovery of 0.45m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH11510 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
0.00m - 1.00m (recovery of 1.0m)
1.00m - 2.00m (recovery of 1.0m)
2.00m - 2.50m (recovery of 0.5m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
HA11874 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
0.00m - 1.00m (recovery of 1.0m)
1.00m - 2.00m (recovery of 1.0m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
HA12040 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
0.00m - 1.50m (recovery of 1.5m)
1.95m - 3.00m (recovery of 1.05m)
GHD Pty LtdGHD Pty Ltd999 Hay Street Perth WA 6000PO Box 3106 Perth WA 6832T 61 8 6222 8222 F 61 8 6222 8555E [email protected]
Drawn Date Job Number
A4Title Client
KT 17/10/201661/34889 Borehole Photographs WATER CORPORATION
Checked DateProject
BH12210 Perth GWR Stage 2Revision Date Cad Reference
A 17/10/2016 Geotechnical Investigation
This drawing should be read in conjunction with report number 61\34819\158846
Notes:- Photographs of hand auger and direct push recovery only.
GHD | Report for Water Corporation - Perth GWR Stage 2, 61/34889
Perth2 Kimmer Place, Queens Park WA 6107 Ph: +61 8 9258 8323Soil Rock Calibration
James
Client Report No.
Project Test DateReport Date
Sample No. 16100079 16100079 - - - - -
Client ID BH3199 BH3199 - - - - -
Depth (m) 4.45-4.65 4.45-4.65 - - - - -
Iѕ (MPa) 3.86 3.03 - - - - -
Iѕ(50) (MPa) 3.70 3.28 - - - - -
Load Direction Axial Diametral - - - - -
Sample No. - - - - - - -
Client ID - - - - - - -
Depth (m) - - - - - - -
Iѕ (MPa) - - - - - - -
Iѕ(50) (MPa) - - - - - - -
Load Direction - - - - - - -
NOTES/REMARKS: Tested as received + Irregular Lump * AS 1726: Table A8EL: Extremely Low, VL: Very Low, L: Low, M: Medium, H: High, VH: Very High, EH: Extremely High
Sample/s supplied by the client Page 1 of 1 REP32101
Laboratory No. 9926
- - -*Descriptive Term - - - -
Trilab Pty Ltd ABN 25 065 630 506 Reference should be made to Trilab's “Standard Terms and Conditions of Business” for further details.
The results of calibrations and tests performed apply only to the specific instrument or sample at the time of test unless otherwise clearly stated.
POINT LOAD TEST REPORTTest Method: AS 4133.4.1
GHD
61/34889/04 - Perth GWR Stage 2
P 16100079-PL
28/10/201628/10/2016
- - -*Descriptive Term VH VH - -
Authorised Signatory
C. Channon
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. The results of the tests, calibrations, and/or measurements included in
this document are traceable to Australian/National Standards.
Tested at Trilab Perth Laboratory
ACCURATE QUALITY RESULTS FOR TOMORROW'S ENGINEERING
0 0.00 True
Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : Page : 1 of 2EP1610049
:: AddressAddress 2 KIMMER PLACEQUEENS PARK WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6107
10 Hod Way Malaga WA Australia 6090
:Telephone +61 07 3265 5656 :Telephone +61-8-9209 7655:Project 61/34889/04 - Perth GWR Stage 2 Date Samples Received : 24-Oct-2016 13:15:Order number PER 1710015 Date Analysis Commenced : 27-Oct-2016:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 27-Oct-2016 17:07
Sampler : ----Site : ----Quote number : ----
2:No. of samples received
2:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Results
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Jeremy Truong Laboratory Manager Perth Inorganics, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reportingø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.~ = Indicates an estimated value.
Key :
Analytical Results
------------P16100076 / BH105890.6-0.9m
P16100071 / BH38240.2-1.0m
Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL)
------------[24-Oct-2016][24-Oct-2016]Client sampling date / time
LOR ‐ Limits of Reporting 1 Slight RPDs have only been considered where a concentration is greater than 1 times the EQL.ASS ‐ Acid Sulfate Soil 2 Moderate High RPDs are in bold (Acceptable RPDs for each EQL multiplier range are: 50 (1‐10 x EQL); 50 (10‐30 x EQL); 50 ( > 30 x EQL) )ASSMP ‐ Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan 3 StrongWA DER ‐ Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation 4 Extreme RPD < 50%ND ‐ No Detect RPD ≥ 50% and Result < 10 x EQL"‐" ‐ denotes not analysed RPD ≥ 50% and Result ≥ 10 x EQL"#" ‐ denotes RPD cannot be calculated based on LOR Value
LOR ‐ Limits of Reporting *RPDs have only been considered where a concentration is greater than 1 times the EQL. DER 2015 ASS CriteriaFWG ‐ Freshwater Guidelines Dissolved Aluminimum value relates to water with a pH >6.50, no guideline is available for water pH<6.50.STIWG ‐ Short Term Irrrigation Water GuidelineASS ‐ Acid Sulfate Soil RPD < 50% DER 2014 Fresh Waters ‐ SW Aust. WetlandsDW ‐ Dewatering RPD ≥ 50% and Result < 10 x EQLND ‐ No Detect RPD ≥ 50% and Result ≥ 10 x EQL"‐" ‐ denotes not analysed Arsenic (V) guideline value adopted for Arsenic (unspeciated) "#" ‐ denotes RPD cannot be calculated based on LOR Value Chromium (VI) guideline value adopted for Chromium (unspeciated)
Selenium value applies to a slightly–moderately disturbed system and a 95% level of protection (%species).Nutrient values for South West Western Australian Wetland environments adopted from ANZECC/ARMACANZ 2000 Freshwater and Marine Guidelines, Table 3.3.6
DER 2014 Short‐term irrigationChloride concentrations may cause foliar damage in non tolerant species.
**High RPDs are in bold (Acceptable RPDs for each EQL multiplier range are: 50 (1‐10 x EQL); 50 (10‐30 x EQL); 50 ( > 30 x EQL) )
Field Parameters
Trigger values taken from Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (ANZECC and ARMCANZ, 2000), and adopted by DER in Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites (DER, 2014), and in the National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 (No. 1) (NEPM) (NEPC, 2013)
:Telephone +61 08 6222 8222 :Telephone 08 9209 7655:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 04-Oct-2016 16:45:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 20-Oct-2016:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 24-Oct-2016 13:46
Sampler : Kien ThamSite : ----Quote number : ----
100:No. of samples received
100:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Results
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Daniel Fisher Inorganics Analyst Perth ASS, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reportingø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.~ = Indicates an estimated value.
:Order number ---- :Quote number EP2015GHDSER0913 (EP/850/15 V2):C-O-C number ---- :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : ----Sampler : Kien Tham
DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 20-Oct-201604-Oct-2016 4:45 PM
Scheduled Reporting Date: 26-Oct-2016:Client Requested Due Date
26-Oct-2016
Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Client Drop Off Not AvailableSecurity SealNo. of coolers/boxes : :6 Temperature -1.6 - Ice present
: : 100 / 100Receipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed
General Comments
This report contains the following information:l
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report- Requested Deliverables
l Please see scanned COC for sample discrepencies: extra samples , samples not received etc.l Please direct any queries related to sample condition / numbering / breakages to Sample Receipt ([email protected])l Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Environmental Perth.l Please direct any turnaround / technical queries to the laboratory contact designated above.l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (14 days), Solid (60 days) from date of completion of Work Order.l pH analysis should be conducted within 6 hours of sampling.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609883 Amendment 0
2 of 5:Page20-Oct-2016:Issue Date
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.
Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
Some items described below may be part of a laboratory process necessary for the execution of client requested tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such as the determination of moisture content and preparation tasks, that are included in the package.If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will default to 15:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes and will be shown bracketed without a time component.
SO
IL -
EA
037
AS
S F
ield
Scr
eeni
ng A
naly
sis
EP1609883-001 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH169 1.00 ü
EP1609883-002 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH169 1.90 ü
EP1609883-003 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH169 3.00 ü
EP1609883-004 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH169 4.50 ü
EP1609883-005 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH169 6.00 ü
EP1609883-006 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH929 1.00 ü
EP1609883-007 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH929 1.90 ü
EP1609883-008 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH929 3.00 ü
EP1609883-009 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] B1410 1.00 ü
EP1609883-010 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH1410 2.00 ü
EP1609883-011 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH1410 3.00 ü
EP1609883-012 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2226 1.00 ü
EP1609883-013 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2226 1.90 ü
EP1609883-014 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2226 3.00 ü
EP1609883-015 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2532 1.00 ü
EP1609883-016 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2532 1.90 ü
EP1609883-017 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2532 3.00 ü
EP1609883-018 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH2864 1.00 ü
EP1609883-019 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH2864 1.50 ü
EP1609883-020 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH2864 2.00 ü
EP1609883-021 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH2864 2.45 ü
EP1609883-022 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH2864 3.00 ü
EP1609883-023 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 0.75 ü
EP1609883-024 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 1.00 ü
EP1609883-025 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 1.25 ü
EP1609883-026 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 1.50 ü
EP1609883-027 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 1.90 ü
EP1609883-028 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 2.40 ü
EP1609883-029 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 3.00 ü
EP1609883-030 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 3.50 ü
EP1609883-031 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 3.75 ü
EP1609883-032 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 4.00 ü
EP1609883-033 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 4.20 ü
EP1609883-034 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 0.25 ü
EP1609883-035 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 0.50 ü
Matrix: SOIL
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609883 Amendment 0
3 of 5:Page20-Oct-2016:Issue Date
SO
IL -
EA
037
AS
S F
ield
Scr
eeni
ng A
naly
sis
EP1609883-036 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 0.75 ü
EP1609883-037 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 1.00 ü
EP1609883-038 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 1.25 ü
EP1609883-039 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 1.50 ü
EP1609883-040 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 1.75 ü
EP1609883-041 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 2.00 ü
EP1609883-042 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 2.25 ü
EP1609883-043 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 2.50 ü
EP1609883-044 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 3.00 ü
EP1609883-045 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 0.25 ü
EP1609883-046 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 0.50 ü
EP1609883-047 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 0.75 ü
EP1609883-048 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.00 ü
EP1609883-049 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.25 ü
EP1609883-050 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.50 ü
EP1609883-051 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.75 ü
EP1609883-052 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 2.00 ü
EP1609883-053 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 2.25 ü
EP1609883-054 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 2.50 ü
EP1609883-055 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 3.00 ü
EP1609883-056 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH4163 1.00 ü
EP1609883-057 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH4163 2.00 ü
EP1609883-058 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH4163 3.00 ü
EP1609883-059 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH4834 1.00 ü
EP1609883-060 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH4834 2.00 ü
EP1609883-061 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH4834 3.00 ü
EP1609883-062 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5172 3.00 ü
EP1609883-063 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 1.00 ü
EP1609883-064 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 1.25 ü
EP1609883-065 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 1.50 ü
EP1609883-066 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 1.75 ü
EP1609883-067 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 2.00 ü
EP1609883-068 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 2.25 ü
EP1609883-069 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 2.50 ü
EP1609883-070 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 3.00 ü
EP1609883-071 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6176 1.00 ü
EP1609883-072 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6176 2.00 ü
EP1609883-073 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6176 3.00 ü
EP1609883-074 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6509 1.00 ü
EP1609883-075 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6509 2.00 ü
EP1609883-076 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6509 2.30 ü
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609883 Amendment 0
4 of 5:Page20-Oct-2016:Issue Date
SO
IL -
EA
037
AS
S F
ield
Scr
eeni
ng A
naly
sis
EP1609883-077 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6509 3.00 ü
EP1609883-078 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 0.75 ü
EP1609883-079 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 1.00 ü
EP1609883-080 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 1.25 ü
EP1609883-081 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 1.50 ü
EP1609883-082 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 1.75 ü
EP1609883-083 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 2.00 ü
EP1609883-084 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 2.25 ü
EP1609883-085 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 2.40 ü
EP1609883-086 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 3.00 ü
EP1609883-087 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 0.50 ü
EP1609883-088 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 0.75 ü
EP1609883-089 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 1.00 ü
EP1609883-090 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 1.25 ü
EP1609883-091 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 1.50 ü
EP1609883-092 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 1.75 ü
EP1609883-093 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 2.00 ü
EP1609883-094 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 2.20 ü
EP1609883-095 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 3.00 ü
EP1609883-096 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 0.75 ü
EP1609883-097 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 1.00 ü
EP1609883-098 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 1.25 ü
EP1609883-099 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 1.50 ü
EP1609883-100 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 1.75 ü
Proactive Holding Time Report
Sample(s) have been received within the recommended holding times for the requested analysis.
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609883 Amendment 0
:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 04-Oct-2016:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 20-Oct-2016
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 24-Oct-2016Sampler : Kien ThamSite : ----Quote number : ----No. of samples received 100:No. of samples analysed 100:
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limitsl Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limitsl Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Daniel Fisher Inorganics Analyst Perth ASS, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lotCAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference# = Indicates failed QC
Key :
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
l No Method Blank (MB) or Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Results are required to be reported.
Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
l No Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Results are required to be reported.
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EP1609883 Page : 1 of 5
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division PerthGHD PTY LTD:Contact MS AMANDA GILFOYLE Telephone : 08 9209 7655:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 04-Oct-2016
Site : ---- Issue Date : 24-Oct-2016Kien Tham:Sampler No. of samples received : 100
:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 100
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.l NO Duplicate outliers occur.l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l NO Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
l NO Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EA037: Ass Field Screening AnalysisSnap Lock Bag - frozen on receipt at ALS (EA037)
Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.0010 100 üASS Field Screening Analysis EA037
Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
In house: Referenced to Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, version 2.1 June 2004. As received samples are tested for pH field and pH fox and assessed for a reaction rating.
:Telephone +61 08 6222 8222 :Telephone 08 9209 7655:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 19-Oct-2016 11:02:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 24-Oct-2016:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 25-Oct-2016 11:10
Sampler : Kien ThamSite : ----Quote number : ----
97:No. of samples received
97:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Results
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Daniel Fisher Inorganics Analyst Perth ASS, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reportingø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.~ = Indicates an estimated value.
:Order number ---- :Quote number EP2015GHDSER0913 (EP/850/15 V2):C-O-C number ---- :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : ----Sampler : Kien Tham
DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 20-Oct-201619-Oct-2016 11:02 AM
Scheduled Reporting Date: 26-Oct-2016:Client Requested Due Date
26-Oct-2016
Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Client Drop Off Intact.Security SealNo. of coolers/boxes : :1 Temperature 2.1 - Ice present
: : 96 / 96Receipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed
General Comments
This report contains the following information:l
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report- Requested Deliverables
l Please see scanned COC for sample discrepencies: extra samples , samples not received etc.l Please direct any queries related to sample condition / numbering / breakages to Sample Receipt ([email protected])l Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Environmental Perth.l Please direct any turnaround / technical queries to the laboratory contact designated above.l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (14 days), Solid (60 days) from date of completion of Work Order.l pH analysis should be conducted within 6 hours of sampling.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609910 Amendment 0
2 of 5:Page20-Oct-2016:Issue Date
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.
Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
Some items described below may be part of a laboratory process necessary for the execution of client requested tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such as the determination of moisture content and preparation tasks, that are included in the package.If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will default to 15:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes and will be shown bracketed without a time component.
SO
IL -
EA
037
AS
S F
ield
Scr
eeni
ng A
naly
sis
EP1609910-001 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 2.00 ü
EP1609910-002 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 2.25 ü
EP1609910-003 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 2.50 ü
EP1609910-004 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 3.00 ü
EP1609910-005 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 0.75 ü
EP1609910-006 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 1.00 ü
EP1609910-007 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 1.25 ü
EP1609910-008 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 1.50 ü
EP1609910-009 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 1.75 ü
EP1609910-010 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 2.00 ü
EP1609910-011 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 2.25 ü
EP1609910-012 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 2.50 ü
EP1609910-013 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 3.00 ü
EP1609910-014 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8554 3.00 ü
EP1609910-015 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 0.50 ü
EP1609910-016 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 0.75 ü
EP1609910-017 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 1.00 ü
EP1609910-018 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 1.25 ü
EP1609910-019 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 1.50 ü
EP1609910-020 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 1.75 ü
EP1609910-021 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 2.00 ü
EP1609910-022 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 2.25 ü
EP1609910-023 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 2.50 ü
EP1609910-024 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 2.75 ü
EP1609910-025 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 3.00 ü
EP1609910-026 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 3.25 ü
EP1609910-027 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 3.50 ü
EP1609910-028 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 3.75 ü
EP1609910-029 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 4.00 ü
EP1609910-030 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 4.25 ü
EP1609910-031 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 4.50 ü
EP1609910-032 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 4.75 ü
EP1609910-033 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 5.00 ü
EP1609910-034 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 5.25 ü
EP1609910-035 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 5.50 ü
Matrix: SOIL
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609910 Amendment 0
3 of 5:Page20-Oct-2016:Issue Date
SO
IL -
EA
037
AS
S F
ield
Scr
eeni
ng A
naly
sis
EP1609910-036 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH11168 3.00 ü
EP1609910-037 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH11168 4.00 ü
EP1609910-038 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 0.25 ü
EP1609910-039 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 0.50 ü
EP1609910-040 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 0.75 ü
EP1609910-041 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 1.00 ü
EP1609910-042 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 1.25 ü
EP1609910-043 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 1.50 ü
EP1609910-044 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 1.75 ü
EP1609910-045 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 2.00 ü
EP1609910-046 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 2.25 ü
EP1609910-047 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 2.40 ü
EP1609910-048 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 3.00 ü
EP1609910-049 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9266 0.50 ü
EP1609910-050 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9579 1.00 ü
EP1609910-051 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9579 2.00 ü
EP1609910-052 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9579 3.00 ü
EP1609910-053 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 0.50 ü
EP1609910-054 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 0.75 ü
EP1609910-055 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 1.00 ü
EP1609910-056 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 1.25 ü
EP1609910-057 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 1.50 ü
EP1609910-058 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 1.75 ü
EP1609910-059 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 2.00 ü
EP1609910-060 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 2.25 ü
EP1609910-061 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 2.40 ü
EP1609910-062 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 3.00 ü
EP1609910-063 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 0.50 ü
EP1609910-064 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 0.75 ü
EP1609910-065 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 1.00 ü
EP1609910-066 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 1.25 ü
EP1609910-067 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 1.50 ü
EP1609910-068 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 1.75 ü
EP1609910-069 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 2.00 ü
EP1609910-070 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 2.20 ü
EP1609910-071 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 3.00 ü
EP1609910-072 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 3.00 ü
EP1609910-073 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 3.75 ü
EP1609910-074 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 4.50 ü
EP1609910-075 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 4.75 ü
EP1609910-076 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 5.00 ü
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609910 Amendment 0
4 of 5:Page20-Oct-2016:Issue Date
SO
IL -
EA
037
AS
S F
ield
Scr
eeni
ng A
naly
sis
EP1609910-077 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 5.25 ü
EP1609910-078 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 5.50 ü
EP1609910-079 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 5.75 ü
EP1609910-080 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 6.00 ü
EP1609910-081 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH11510 1.00 ü
EP1609910-082 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH11510 2.00 ü
EP1609910-083 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH11510 3.00 ü
EP1609910-084 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH12210 1.00 ü
EP1609910-085 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH12210 2.00 ü
EP1609910-086 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH12210 3.00 ü
EP1609910-087 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA01 ü
EP1609910-088 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA03 ü
EP1609910-089 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA04 ü
EP1609910-090 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA05 ü
EP1609910-091 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA06 ü
EP1609910-092 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA07 ü
EP1609910-093 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA08 ü
EP1609910-094 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA09 ü
EP1609910-095 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA11 ü
EP1609910-096 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA12 ü
Proactive Holding Time Report
Sample(s) have been received within the recommended holding times for the requested analysis.
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1609910 Amendment 0
:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 19-Oct-2016:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 24-Oct-2016
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 25-Oct-2016Sampler : Kien ThamSite : ----Quote number : ----No. of samples received 97:No. of samples analysed 97:
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limitsl Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limitsl Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Daniel Fisher Inorganics Analyst Perth ASS, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lotCAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference# = Indicates failed QC
Key :
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
l No Method Blank (MB) or Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Results are required to be reported.
Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
l No Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Results are required to be reported.
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EP1609910 Page : 1 of 5
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division PerthGHD PTY LTD:Contact MS AMANDA GILFOYLE Telephone : 08 9209 7655:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 19-Oct-2016
Site : ---- Issue Date : 25-Oct-2016Kien Tham:Sampler No. of samples received : 97
:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 97
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.l NO Duplicate outliers occur.l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l NO Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
l NO Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EA037: Ass Field Screening AnalysisSnap Lock Bag - frozen on receipt at ALS (EA037)
Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.31 10.0010 97 üASS Field Screening Analysis EA037
Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
In house: Referenced to Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines, version 2.1 June 2004. As received samples are tested for pH field and pH fox and assessed for a reaction rating.
Geotech InvestigationDate Samples Received : 04-Oct-2016 16:45
:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 26-Oct-2016:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 28-Oct-2016 19:09
Sampler : Kien ThamSite : ----Quote number : ----
47:No. of samples received
47:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Results
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Daniel Fisher Inorganics Analyst Perth ASS, Malaga, WAJeremy Truong Laboratory Manager Perth Inorganics, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reportingø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.~ = Indicates an estimated value.
Key :
ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite):Retained Acidity not required because pH KCl greater than or equal to 4.5l
ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite): ANC not required for various samples because pH KCl less than 6.5l
ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite): Liming rate is calculated and reported on a dry weight basis assuming use of fine agricultural lime (CaCO3) and using a safety factor of 1.5 to allow for non-homogeneous mixing and poor reactivity of lime. For conversion of Liming Rate from 'kg/t dry weight' to 'kg/m3 in-situ soil', multiply 'reported results' x 'wet bulk density of soil in t/m3'.
:Order number ---- :Quote number EP2015GHDSER0913 (EP/850/15 V2):C-O-C number ---- :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : ----Sampler : Kien Tham
DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 25-Oct-201604-Oct-2016 4:45 PM
Scheduled Reporting Date: 28-Oct-2016:Client Requested Due Date
28-Oct-2016
Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Samples On Hand Not AvailableSecurity SealNo. of coolers/boxes : :---- Temperature N/A
: : 47 / 47Receipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed
General Comments
This report contains the following information:l
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report- Requested Deliverables
l Please see scanned COC for sample discrepencies: extra samples , samples not received etc.l Please direct any queries related to sample condition / numbering / breakages to Sample Receipt ([email protected])l Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Environmental Perth.l Please direct any turnaround / technical queries to the laboratory contact designated above.l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (14 days), Solid (60 days) from date of completion of Work Order.l pH analysis should be conducted within 6 hours of sampling.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1610085 Amendment 0
2 of 5:Page25-Oct-2016:Issue Date
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.
Any sample identifications that cannot be displayed entirely in the analysis summary table will be listed below.
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1610085 Amendment 0
3 of 5:Page25-Oct-2016:Issue Date
Some items described below may be part of a laboratory process necessary for the execution of client requested tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such as the determination of moisture content and preparation tasks, that are included in the package.If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will default to 15:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes and will be shown bracketed without a time component.
SO
IL -
EA
026
Chr
omiu
m R
educ
ible
Sul
phur
SO
IL -
EA
029b
TP
ATP
A
SO
IL -
EA
033-
WA
WA
- C
hrom
ium
Sui
te fo
r Aci
d S
ulph
ate
Soi
ls
SO
IL -
EP
004
(Car
bon)
Org
anic
Mat
ter &
Tot
al O
rgan
ic C
arbo
n (C
alc.
)
EP1610085-001 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH169 6.00 EP160988... ü ü ü
EP1610085-002 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH929 3.00 EP160988... ü ü
EP1610085-003 [ 04-Oct-2016 ] BH2226 1.90 EP16098... ü ü ü
EP1610085-004 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH2864 1.00 EP16098... ü ü ü
EP1610085-005 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 0.25 EP16098... ü
EP1610085-006 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 1.75 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-007 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3506 2.50 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-008 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-009 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.25 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-010 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 1.50 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-011 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 2.50 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-012 [ 05-Oct-2016 ] BH3824 3.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-013 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH4834 2.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-014 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 1.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-015 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 2.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-016 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH5499 3.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-017 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6509 3.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-018 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 1.25 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-019 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH6832 3.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-020 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 0.50 EP16098... ü
EP1610085-021 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 1.50 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-022 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7520 2.20 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-023 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 1.00 EP16098... ü ü
EP1610085-024 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH7858 2.25 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-025 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 1.00 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-026 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8191 3.00 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-027 [ 06-Oct-2016 ] BH8554 3.00 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-028 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 2.50 EP1609... ü ü ü
EP1610085-029 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 4.00 EP1609... ü ü
EP1610085-030 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 5.50 EP1609... ü ü
EP1610085-031 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH11168 3.00 EP1609... ü ü ü
EP1610085-032 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 0.75 EP1609... ü ü
EP1610085-033 [ 07-Oct-2016 ] BH10589 2.40 EP1609... ü ü
EP1610085-034 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9266 0.50 EP16099... ü
EP1610085-035 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9579 1.00 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-036 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9579 3.00 EP16099... ü ü ü
EP1610085-037 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 0.75 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-038 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 1.50 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-039 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH9894 3.00 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-040 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 1.50 EP1609... ü ü
Matrix: SOIL
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1610085 Amendment 0
4 of 5:Page25-Oct-2016:Issue Date
SO
IL -
EA
026
Chr
omiu
m R
educ
ible
Sul
phur
SO
IL -
EA
029b
TP
ATP
A
SO
IL -
EA
033-
WA
WA
- C
hrom
ium
Sui
te fo
r Aci
d S
ulph
ate
Soi
ls
SO
IL -
EP
004
(Car
bon)
Org
anic
Mat
ter &
Tot
al O
rgan
ic C
arbo
n (C
alc.
)
EP1610085-041 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH10202 3.00 EP1609... ü ü
EP1610085-042 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 3.00 EP16099... ü ü ü
EP1610085-043 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 4.50 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-044 [ 10-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 5.50 EP16099... ü ü
EP1610085-045 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] BH11510 1.00 EP1609... ü ü ü
EP1610085-046 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA03 EP1609910-088 ü ü
EP1610085-047 [ 11-Oct-2016 ] QA09 EP1609910-094 ü ü
Proactive Holding Time Report
The following table summarises breaches of recommended holding times that have occurred prior to samples/instructions being received at the laboratory.
Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. Matrix: SOIL
EvaluationClient Sample ID(s)
Due for extraction
Due for analysis Evaluation
Samples Received Instructions ReceivedDate Date
Method
ContainerEP004: Organic Matter
BH10797 2.50 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201611-Nov-201614-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH11168 3.00 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201611-Nov-201614-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH11510 1.00 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201615-Nov-201618-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH169 6.00 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201608-Nov-201611-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH2226 1.90 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201608-Nov-201611-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH2864 1.00 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201609-Nov-201612-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH8862 3.00 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201614-Nov-201617-Oct-2016Pulp BagBH9579 3.00 ü û25-Oct-201604-Oct-201614-Nov-201617-Oct-2016Pulp Bag
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1610085 Amendment 0
:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 26-Oct-2016
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 28-Oct-2016Sampler : Kien ThamSite : ----Quote number : ----No. of samples received 47:No. of samples analysed 47:
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limitsl Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limitsl Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
Daniel Fisher Inorganics Analyst Perth ASS, Malaga, WAJeremy Truong Laboratory Manager Perth Inorganics, Malaga, WA
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lotCAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference# = Indicates failed QC
Key :
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % <0.5 -------- --------
Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
l No Matrix Spike (MS) or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Results are required to be reported.
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EP1610085 Page : 1 of 11
Site : ---- Issue Date : 28-Oct-2016Kien Tham:Sampler No. of samples received : 47
:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 47
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.l NO Duplicate outliers occur.l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
l NO Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 33.33 10.001 3 üChromium Reducible Sulphur EA026NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.36 10.005 44 üChromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.001 8 üOrganic Matter EP004NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.36 10.005 44 üSuspension Peroxide Oxidation-Combined Acidity and
SulphateEA029-TPA
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 33.33 5.001 3 üChromium Reducible Sulphur EA026NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üChromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 25.00 10.002 8 üOrganic Matter EP004
Method Blanks (MB)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 33.33 5.001 3 üChromium Reducible Sulphur EA026NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üChromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 5.001 8 üOrganic Matter EP004NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.82 5.003 44 üSuspension Peroxide Oxidation-Combined Acidity and
Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
In house: Referenced to Sullivan et al (1998) The CRS method converts reduced inorganic sulfur to H2S by CrCl2 solution ; the evolved H2S is trapped in a zinc acetate solution as ZnS which is quantified by iodometric titration.
Chromium Reducible Sulphur EA026 SOIL
In house: Referenced to Ahern et al 2004 - a suspension peroxide oxidation method following the 'sulfur trail' by determining the level of 1M KCL extractable sulfur and the sulfur level after oxidation of soil sulphides. The 'acidity trail' is followed by measurement of TAA, TPA and TSA. Liming Rate is based on results for samples as submitted and incorporates a minimum safety factor of 1.5.
Suspension Peroxide Oxidation-Combined Acidity and Sulphate
EA029-TPA SOIL
In house: Referenced to Ahern et al 2004. This method covers the determination of Chromium Reducible Sulfur (SCR); pHKCl; titratable actual acidity (TAA); acid neutralising capacity by back titration (ANC); and net acid soluble sulfur (SNAS) which incorporates peroxide sulfur. It applies to soils and sediments (including sands) derived from coastal regions. Liming Rate is based on results for samples as submitted and incorporates a minimum safety factor of 1.5.
Chromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033 SOIL
In house: Referenced to AS1289.4.1.1 - 1997., Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
In houseDrying at 85 degrees, bagging and labelling (ASS)
EN020PR SOIL
In house: Referenced to AS1289.4.1.1 - 1997. Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 105)
Organic Matter EP004-PR SOIL
0 0.00 True
Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : Page : 1 of 4EP1610055
:Telephone +61 08 6222 8222 :Telephone 08 9209 7655:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 24-Oct-2016 12:35:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 24-Oct-2016:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 28-Oct-2016 23:13
Sampler : A ThoranSite : ----Quote number : ----
4:No. of samples received
4:No. of samples analysed
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Results
Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reportingø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.~ = Indicates an estimated value.
Key :
EK085 (Sulfide as S2-): LOR for sample 'BH3199' raised due to sample matrix interference.l
ED093: Major cations confirmed for sample 2 by re-analysis.l
EA015H (Total Dissolved Solids): TDS for sample 'BH10797' biasing high due to possible sample matrix interferences.l
EA015H (Total Dissolved Solids): TDS for sample 'BH3199' biasing low due to possible sample matrix interferences.l
:Order number ---- :Quote number EP2015GHDSER0913 (EP/850/15 V2):C-O-C number ---- :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard
Site : ----Sampler : A Thoran
DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 24-Oct-201624-Oct-2016 12:35 PM
Scheduled Reporting Date: 31-Oct-2016:Client Requested Due Date
31-Oct-2016
Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Client Drop Off Intact.Security SealNo. of coolers/boxes : :1 Temperature 15.9 - Ice present
: : 4 / 4Receipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed
General Comments
This report contains the following information:l
- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
- Proactive Holding Time Report- Requested Deliverables
l Please see scanned COC for sample discrepencies: extra samples , samples not received etc.l Please direct any queries related to sample condition / numbering / breakages to Sample Receipt ([email protected])l Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Environmental Perth.l Please direct any turnaround / technical queries to the laboratory contact designated above.l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (14 days), Solid (60 days) from date of completion of Work Order.l pH analysis should be conducted within 6 hours of sampling.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1610055 Amendment 0
2 of 3:Page24-Oct-2016:Issue Date
Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances
All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.
l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.
Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis
Some items described below may be part of a laboratory process necessary for the execution of client requested tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such as the determination of moisture content and preparation tasks, that are included in the package.If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will default to 15:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling date is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes and will be shown bracketed without a time component.
WA
TER
- E
A01
0PC
ondu
ctiv
ity (P
C)
WA
TER
- E
D03
8 D
efau
ltA
cidi
ty a
s C
aCO
3 on
ly
WA
TER
- E
G02
0FD
isso
lved
Met
als
by IC
PM
S
WA
TER
- E
K05
5GA
mm
onia
as
N B
y D
iscr
ete
Ana
lyse
r
WA
TER
- E
N05
5 - P
GIo
nic
Bal
ance
by
ED
037P
, ED
041G
, ED
045G
&
WA
TER
- N
T-01
Maj
or C
atio
ns (C
a, M
g, N
a, K
)
WA
TER
- N
T-02
Maj
or A
nion
s (C
hlor
ide,
Sul
phat
e, A
lkal
inity
)
EP1610055-001 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EP1610055-002 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EP1610055-003 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
EP1610055-004 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] QC1 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü
Matrix: WATER
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
WA
TER
- E
A00
5PpH
(PC
)
WA
TER
- E
A01
5HTo
tal D
isso
lved
Sol
ids
- H
igh
Leve
l
WA
TER
- E
G02
0TTo
tal R
ecov
erab
le M
etal
s by
ICP
MS
(in
clud
ing
WA
TER
- E
K07
1GR
eact
ive
Pho
spho
rus
by D
iscr
ete
anal
yser
WA
TER
- E
K08
5MS
ulfid
e as
S 2
-
WA
TER
- N
T-11
Tota
l Nitr
ogen
and
Tot
al P
hosp
horu
s
EP1610055-001 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] BH3199 ü ü ü ü ü ü
EP1610055-002 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] BH8862 ü ü ü ü ü ü
EP1610055-003 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] BH10797 ü ü ü ü ü ü
EP1610055-004 [ 24-Oct-2016 ] QC1 ü ü ü ü ü ü
Matrix: WATER
Client sample IDLaboratory sample
ID
Client sampling
date / time
Proactive Holding Time Report
Sample(s) have been received within the recommended holding times for the requested analysis.
:Client GHD PTY LTDWork Order : EP1610055 Amendment 0
:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 24-Oct-2016:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 24-Oct-2016
:C-O-C number ---- Issue Date : 28-Oct-2016Sampler : A ThoranSite : ----Quote number : ----No. of samples received 4:No. of samples analysed 4:
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limitsl Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limitsl Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lotCAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference# = Indicates failed QC
Key :
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR: No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator (QC Lot: 629523)EA005-P: pH Value ---- 0.01 pH Unit 6.34 6.31 0.474 0% - 20%Anonymous EP1610047-009
EA005-P: pH Value ---- 0.01 pH Unit 7.10 7.11 0.141 0% - 20%Anonymous EP1610051-005
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator (QC Lot: 629526)EA005-P: pH Value ---- 0.01 pH Unit 7.54 7.59 0.661 0% - 20%QC1 EP1610055-004
EA005-P: pH Value ---- 0.01 pH Unit 7.87 7.88 0.127 0% - 20%Anonymous EP1610060-009
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 628450)EK055G: Ammonia as N 7664-41-7 0.01 mg/L 7.90 7.89 0.200 0% - 20%Anonymous EP1610038-001
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 628451)EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N ---- 0.01 mg/L 12.4 12.4 0.670 0% - 20%Anonymous EP1610038-001
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 631334)EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ---- 0.1 mg/L <0.1 0.1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1610017-005
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ---- 0.1 mg/L 1.5 1.5 0.00 0% - 50%Anonymous EP1610022-005
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 631333)EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ---- 0.01 mg/L <0.01 <0.01 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1610017-005
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ---- 0.01 mg/L 0.03 0.03 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1610022-005
EK071G: Reactive Phosphorus as P by discrete analyser (QC Lot: 628446)EK071G: Reactive Phosphorus as P 14265-44-2 0.01 mg/L 0.01 0.01 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1610059-001
EK085M: Sulfide as S2- (QC Lot: 629059)EK085: Sulfide as S2- 18496-25-8 0.1 mg/L <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1610002-001
EK085: Sulfide as S2- 18496-25-8 0.1 mg/L <0.1 <0.1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EP1610017-009
Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB)
Report
Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator (QCLot: 629523)EA005-P: pH Value ---- ---- pH Unit ---- 1004 pH Unit 10299
---- 1007 pH Unit 10299
EA005P: pH by PC Titrator (QCLot: 629526)EA005-P: pH Value ---- ---- pH Unit ---- 1004 pH Unit 10299
---- 1007 pH Unit 10299
EA010P: Conductivity by PC Titrator (QCLot: 629525)EA010-P: Electrical Conductivity @ 25°C ---- 1 µS/cm <1 97.524800 µS/cm 10595
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °C (QCLot: 631971)EA015H: Total Dissolved Solids @180°C ---- 10 mg/L <10 1072000 mg/L 11183
<10 1111000 mg/L 13070
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator (QCLot: 629524)ED037-P: Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 DMO-210-00
EG020A-F: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L <0.05 96.50.5 mg/L 11284
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 630905)EG020A-T: Aluminium 7429-90-5 0.01 mg/L <0.01 88.90.5 mg/L 11686
EG020A-T: Iron 7439-89-6 0.05 mg/L <0.05 88.60.5 mg/L 11282
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 628450)EK055G: Ammonia as N 7664-41-7 0.01 mg/L <0.01 1121 mg/L 11587
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 628451)EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N ---- 0.01 mg/L <0.01 1010.5 mg/L 11292
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 631334)EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N ---- 0.1 mg/L <0.1 97.110 mg/L 11082
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 631333)EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ---- 0.01 mg/L <0.01 94.54.42 mg/L 13070
EK071G: Reactive Phosphorus as P by discrete analyser (QCLot: 628446)EK071G: Reactive Phosphorus as P 14265-44-2 0.01 mg/L <0.01 98.70.5 mg/L 11587
EK085M: Sulfide as S2- (QCLot: 629059)EK085: Sulfide as S2- 18496-25-8 0.1 mg/L <0.1 1080.5 mg/L 11486
Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report
SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike
HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number
ED041G: Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by DA (QCLot: 628447)
EK055G: Ammonia as N by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 628450)Anonymous EP1610046-001 7664-41-7EK055G: Ammonia as N 1071 mg/L 13070
EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 628451)Anonymous EP1610039-006 ----EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N 1080.5 mg/L 13070
EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 631334)Anonymous EP1610017-006 ----EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 89.75 mg/L 13070
EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 631333)Anonymous EP1610017-006 ----EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P 92.11 mg/L 13070
EK071G: Reactive Phosphorus as P by discrete analyser (QCLot: 628446)Anonymous EP1610059-002 14265-44-2EK071G: Reactive Phosphorus as P 1010.5 mg/L 13070
True
Environmental
QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EP1610055 Page : 1 of 8
:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division PerthGHD PTY LTD:Contact MS AMANDA GILFOYLE Telephone : 08 9209 7655:Project 61-34889-03 Perth GWR Stage 2 Geotech Investigation Date Samples Received : 24-Oct-2016
Site : ---- Issue Date : 28-Oct-2016A Thoran:Sampler No. of samples received : 4
:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 4
This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance. Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.
l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.l NO Duplicate outliers occur.l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
l Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist - please see following pages for full details.
R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days
overdue
Days
overdue
Due for extraction Due for analysis
Method
EA005P: pH by PC TitratorClear Plastic Bottle - Natural
24-Oct-2016----BH3199, BH8862,BH10797, QC1
25-Oct-2016---- ---- 1
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples
Matrix: WATERQuality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
Method ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count
Matrix Spikes (MS)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC StandardTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A 0.00 5.000 5
Analysis Holding Time Compliance
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics 14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod
EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)
EA005P: pH by PC TitratorClear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EA005-P)
BH3199, BH8862,BH10797, QC1
24-Oct-2016---- 25-Oct-2016----24-Oct-2016 ---- û
EA010P: Conductivity by PC TitratorClear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EA010-P)
BH3199, BH8862,BH10797, QC1
21-Nov-2016---- 25-Oct-2016----24-Oct-2016 ---- ü
EA015: Total Dissolved Solids dried at 180 ± 5 °CClear Plastic Bottle - Natural (EA015H)
BH3199, BH8862,BH10797, QC1
31-Oct-2016---- 27-Oct-2016----24-Oct-2016 ---- ü
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC TitratorClear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED037-P)
Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üAcidity as Calcium Carbonate ED038NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.004 40 üAlkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.001 8 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 10.001 6 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üConductivity by PC Titrator EA010-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 15.38 10.002 13 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 10.002 12 üMajor Cations - Dissolved ED093FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 10.001 9 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.00 10.004 25 üpH by PC Titrator EA005-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 10.001 6 üReactive Phosphorus as P-By Discrete Analyser EK071GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 10.001 6 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üSulfide as S2- EK085NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 15.38 10.002 13 üTotal Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015HNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.002 16 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 10.001 5 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-TNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.002 16 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üAcidity as Calcium Carbonate ED038NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.004 40 üAlkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 5.001 8 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 33.33 10.002 6 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üConductivity by PC Titrator EA010-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.69 5.001 13 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.001 12 üMajor Cations - Dissolved ED093FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 5.001 9 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.00 10.004 25 üpH by PC Titrator EA005-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üReactive Phosphorus as P-By Discrete Analyser EK071GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 33.33 10.002 6 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üSulfide as S2- EK085NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 15.38 10.002 13 üTotal Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015HNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-TNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
Method Blanks (MB)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.002 40 üAlkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 5.001 8 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type
ExpectedQC Regular Actual
Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method
Method Blanks (MB) - ContinuedNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üConductivity by PC Titrator EA010-PNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.69 5.001 13 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 8.33 5.001 12 üMajor Cations - Dissolved ED093FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 5.001 9 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üReactive Phosphorus as P-By Discrete Analyser EK071GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 5.00 5.001 20 üSulfide as S2- EK085NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.69 5.001 13 üTotal Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015HNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 20.00 5.001 5 üTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-TNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
Matrix Spikes (MS)NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 5.001 8 üAmmonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üChloride by Discrete Analyser ED045GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 7.69 5.001 13 üDissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-FNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 11.11 5.001 9 üNitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK059GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üReactive Phosphorus as P-By Discrete Analyser EK071GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 16.67 5.001 6 üSulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser ED041GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser EK061GNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 0.00 5.000 5 ûTotal Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-TNEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 6.25 5.001 16 üTotal Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser EK067G
Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500 H+ B. This procedure determines pH of water samples by automated ISE. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
pH by PC Titrator EA005-P WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 2510 B. This procedure determines conductivity by automated ISE. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Conductivity by PC Titrator EA010-P WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 2540C. A gravimetric procedure that determines the amount of `filterable` residue in an aqueous sample. A well-mixed sample is filtered through a glass fibre filter (1.2um). The filtrate is evaporated to dryness and dried to constant weight at 180+/-5C. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Dissolved Solids (High Level) EA015H WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 2320 B This procedure determines alkalinity by automated measurement (e.g. PC Titrate) using pH 4.5 for indicating the total alkalinity end-point. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Alkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-P WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 2310 B Acidity is determined by titration with a standardised alkali to an end-point pH of 8.3. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Acidity as Calcium Carbonate ED038 WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-SO4. Dissolved sulfate is determined in a 0.45um filtered sample. Sulfate ions are converted to a barium sulfate suspension in an acetic acid medium with barium chloride. Light absorbance of the BaSO4 suspension is measured by a photometer and the SO4-2 concentration is determined by comparison of the reading with a standard curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Sulfate (Turbidimetric) as SO4 2- by Discrete Analyser
ED041G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500 Cl - G.The thiocyanate ion is liberated from mercuric thiocyanate through sequestration of mercury by the chloride ion to form non-ionised mercuric chloride.in the presence of ferric ions the librated thiocynate forms highly-coloured ferric thiocynate which is measured at 480 nm APHA 21st edition seal method 2 017-1-L april 2003
Chloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 3120 and 3125; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 and 6020; Cations are determined by either ICP-AES or ICP-MS techniques. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Sodium Adsorption Ratio is calculated from Ca, Mg and Na which determined by ALS in house method QWI-EN/ED093F. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Hardness parameters are calculated based on APHA 2340 B. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Major Cations - Dissolved ED093F WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. Samples are 0.45µm filtered prior to analysis. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector.
Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-F WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020. The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector.
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-NH3 G Ammonia is determined by direct colorimetry by Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Ammonia as N by Discrete analyser EK055G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-NO3- F. Combined oxidised Nitrogen (NO2+NO3) is determined by Chemical Reduction and direct colourimetry by Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser
EK059G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-Norg D (In house). An aliquot of sample is digested using a high temperature Kjeldahl digestion to convert nitrogenous compounds to ammonia. Ammonia is determined colorimetrically by discrete analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N By Discrete Analyser
EK061G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-Norg / 4500-NO3-. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + Nox) By Discrete Analyser
EK062G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-P H, Jirka et al (1976), Zhang et al (2006). This procedure involves sulphuric acid digestion of a sample aliquot to break phosphorus down to orthophosphate. The orthophosphate reacts with ammonium molybdate and antimony potassium tartrate to form a complex which is then reduced and its concentration measured at 880nm using discrete analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Phosphorus as P By Discrete Analyser
EK067G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-P F Ammonium molybdate and potassium antimonyl tartrate reacts in acid medium with othophosphate to form a heteropoly acid -phosphomolybdic acid - which is reduced to intensely coloured molybdenum blue by ascorbic acid. Quantification is by Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Reactive Phosphorus as P-By Discrete Analyser
EK071G WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500-S2- D. Sulfide species present in water samples are immediately precipitated when collected in pretreated caustic/zinc acetate preserved sample containers. After the supernatant is discarded, the resultant precipitate is then coloured using methylene blue indicator and measured using UV-VIS detection at 664nm. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Sulfide as S2- EK085 WATER
In house: Referenced to APHA 1030F. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)Ionic Balance by PCT DA and Turbi SO4 DA
In house: Referenced to APHA 4500 Norg - D; APHA 4500 P - H. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
TKN/TP Digestion EK061/EK067 WATER
In house: Referenced to USEPA SW846-3005. Method 3005 is a Nitric/Hydrochloric acid digestion procedure used to prepare surface and ground water samples for analysis by ICPAES or ICPMS. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)