Top Banner
A2 G&P US Government and Politics Campaign Finance
16
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 2: A2 G&P campaign finance

UNIT 3A: OUTLINE: KEY CONCEPTS

KEY CONCEPTS

Open, closed and invisible primariesThe caucus systemThe balanced ticketCandidate and issue centred campaignsMomentumSoft and hard moneyNegative campaigningInsider and outsider candidatesFixed termsSwing states

Page 3: A2 G&P campaign finance

OUTLINE: KEY IDEAS

Answering questions on this topic requires knowledge of: The main characteristics of presidential and

congressional elections and campaigns.The main influences on their outcomes.Candidate selection and nomination

through the primary and caucus system and the role of the national nominating conventions

Debates concerning the workings and outcomes of the Electoral College and its impact on campaigns

Page 4: A2 G&P campaign finance

OUTLINE: KEY IDEAS

Answering questions on this topic requires knowledge of: The significance of money as a factor in

electoral success.The impact of the media on campaigns and

candidatesDirect democracy at State level through the

use of referendumsInitiatives, propositions and recall elections,

and debates concerning their useComparisons with the UK electoral process to

illustrate arguments

Page 5: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

By the 1970s there were increasing concerns about the amount of money being spent in presidential elections

In the 1972 presidential election, Nixon formed his own re-election committee (CRP).

Through CRP he managed to raise vast sums of money (much more than Democrat contender George McGovern)

It was through CRP that the break-in and bugging at Watergate complex was masterminded.

Page 7: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

The Watergate affair gave much needed impetus to reforming the campaign finance system.

Congress has begun to pass campaign finance reform legislation in 1971, but the year in which Nixon resigned 1974, saw a much more significant set of reforms.

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 made a number of significant changes hoping to reduce reliance on a few, very wealthy donors – known as ‘fat cats’ – and equalise the amount of money spent by both major parties.

Page 8: A2 G&P campaign finance

Federal Campaign Act 1974

Federal Campaign Act 1974

o Limited individual contributions to a candidate to $1,000

o Limited corporate contributions to a candidate to $5,000

o Forbade donations from foreign donors

o Limited expenditure to $10 mill in primaries and further $20 mill in election (figures index linked to inflation so by 2000 it was $34 mill and $68 mill)

o Provided matching funds from federal tax payers on a dollar for dollar basis for contributions up to $250

o Established the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce and regulate new system

Page 9: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

The objectives of these reforms were praiseworthy and they were partly successful . But the law was found to have too many loopholes and was weakened by both the Supreme Court and Congress.

In 1976, in Buckley v Valeo, the Supreme Court rules that limitations on what individuals or Political Action Committees could spent either supporting or opposing a candidate infringed 1st Amendment rights and were therefore unconstitutional.

Page 10: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

In 1979, Congress further weakened the law by allowing parties to raise money for such aspects as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives as well as ‘party building’ activities. This is the so-called ‘soft money’ that would soon be regarded by most observers to be out of control.

In 2000, Senator John McCain made campaign finance reform a focal point of his bid for the Republican nomination and this gave increased momentum to attempts both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate to pass a Campaign Finance Reform Bill.

Page 11: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

Success eventually came in 2002, mainly through the endeavours of senators John McCain (Republican – Arizona) and Russell Feingold (Democrat – Wisconsin) with the passsage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002), commonly known as the McCain-Feingold law.

2004 election saw the appearance of the ‘527 groups’, named after the US tax code under which they operate.

527’s, such as ‘America Coming Together’ and ‘Swift Boat Veterans for Truth’ raised and spent millions, most of it donated by a few super rich and largely unknown people.

Page 12: A2 G&P campaign finance

Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002)o National party committees banned from raising or spending ‘soft money’.

o Labour unions and corporations forbidden from funding issue advertisements directly.

o The use of union and corporate money to broadcast advertisements that mention a federal candidate within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary prohibited.

o Fundraising on federal property forbidden.

o Increased individual limits on contributions to individual candidates or candidate committees to $2,300 (to be increased for inflation in each odd numbered year)

o Banned contributions from foreign nationals

o ‘Stand By Your Ad’ provision, resulting in all campaign ads including a verbal endorsement by the candidate with the words; Im (candidate) and I approve this message.’

Page 13: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

In the 2008 election, Barack Obama raised huge amounts of money through the internet from small donors.

The huge success of his electronic fundraising may well ensure that this becomes a model for future presidential campaigns.

Obama became the first major party presidential candidate to forego the federal matching funds – worth $84 million in 2008 – during the general election campaign.

Page 14: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

McCain took the federal money, but in doing so had to limit himself to that as a cap for his general election spending.

With Obama raising huge amounts of money during the final weeks of the campaign – he raised over $150 million in September along – McCain was at a significant disadvantage, and it showed.

It showed in the final weeks by the fact that Obama had far more money to spend on campaigning and on opening offices in swing states than McCain could afford.

Page 15: A2 G&P campaign finance

Campaign Finance

In October, Obama spent over $5 million on TV ads in North Carolina. McCain had spent just over £790,000.

During that same time, McCain’s 11-percentage point lead in the state disappeared.

In Missouri, another swing state, Obama opened up 41 field offices compared to McCains 16. McCain’s early 7 point lead, disappeared.

McCain trying to have conversation with a man with a ‘megaphone!’.

Page 16: A2 G&P campaign finance

Exam Questions

ESSAY QUESTION

What are the major concerns regarding campaign finance in presidential elections?

What are the reforms of 1974 and 2002 to campaign finance and how effective have they been?