A word about Data & Statistics Question: Statistically speaking, which statement below is more likely to be correct? a) “42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.” - Steven Wright b) “97.3% of all statistics are made up.” ________________________________________________________________________________ -"Five out of four people have trouble with “statistics”" - Steven Wright - "Statistics means never having to say you're certain." - “A statistician can have the head in an oven and the feet in ice, and s/he will say that on the average s/he feels fine.” _______________________________________________ "Statistics are no substitute for judgment." -- Henry Clay 1
A word about Data & Statistics. Question: Statistically speaking, which statement below is more likely to be correct? “42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.” - Steven Wright “97.3% of all statistics are made up.” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A word about Data & Statistics
Question: Statistically speaking, which statement below is more likely to be correct?a) “42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.” - Steven
Wright
b) “97.3% of all statistics are made up.”________________________________________________________________________________
-"Five out of four people have trouble with “statistics”" - Steven Wright
- "Statistics means never having to say you're certain."- “A statistician can have the head in an oven and the feet in ice, and s/he will say that on the average s/he feels fine.” _______________________________________________
"Statistics are no substitute for judgment." -- Henry Clay
1
Kalamazoo CMHSAS - Coord. Agency - Service area
2
SA Treatment Data in the Kazoo CA area (2011)
Source: TEDS 20113
CA Area0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%FY-2011 - SA Tx Data - Kazoo CA area
Alcohol
Coc.
mj
Heroin
Oth Opioid
Meth
Stim/Oth
SA Treatment Data in the Kazoo CA area (2011)
BarryBranch
CalhounCass
KazooS. Jo
e VBCA Area
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Alcohol
Coc.
mj
Heroin
Oth Opioid
Meth
Stim/Oth
Source: TEDS 20114
SA Prevention Priority #1: Reduce Under-age Drinking (UAD)
Barry Branch Calhoun Cass Kazoo S. Joe VB YRBS-MI YRBS-US0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
22.5%
25.6%
21.8%19.9%
21.4%
26.3%
17.3%
30.5%
38.7%
Drank alcohol in the past 30 days
High School
Middle School
Source: 2012 MiPHY 5
SA Prevention Priority #1: Reduce Under-age Drinking (UAD)
Source: 2012 MiPHY
Barry Branch Calhoun Cass Kazoo S. Joe VB YRBS-MI YRBS-US(Binge Drinking) Had five or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of
hours, in the past 30 days
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
13.5%
16.3%
14.7%
13.0% 12.9%
17.4%
10.6%
17.8%
21.9%Binge drinking in the last 30 days
High School
Middle School
6
Some “Contributing Factors” to UAD:1) Access to alcohol Issues2) Perception of Risk3) Perception of Wrongness
Source: 2012 MiPHY (High School)
7
Barry Branch Calhoun Cass Kazoo S. Joseph V. Buren
Under Age Drinking:The role that parents & friends play in it! Source: 2012 M iPHY (High
School)
9
Barry Branch Calhoun Cass Kazoo S. Joseph V. Buren
At home 33% 25% 23.8% 31.3% 28.2% 32.1% 37.4%
At another person’s house . . . (friend, friend of the friend)
62.4 70.3% 71.4% 65.5% 64.5% 58% 53.9%
Where did you drink alcohol in the past 30 days?
Under Age Drinking: Statistics sometimes become stories of human
tragedies!
10
Research: “People who report starting to drink before
the age of 15 are four times (4X) more likely to also report meeting criteria for alcohol dependence at some point in life.” (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse/Alcoholism – NIAAA)
institutions and Resources) of this community which can be used to prevent/reduce UAD & other Alcohol Consequences
#2) Actions and ideas that this group can plan and implement in the next 12 months to help prevent/reduce UAD & other destructive Consequences of Alcohol in this County.
14
Another Priority area: Rx Drug AbuseBack to the SA Treatment Data Graph
(Kazoo CA area, FY 2011)
BarryBranch
CalhounCass
KazooS. Jo
e VBCA Area
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Alcohol
Coc.
mj
Heroin
Oth Opioid
Meth
Stim/Oth
Source: TEDS 201115
Rx Drug abuse: DEA Controlled Substance
Schedule ChartSCHEDULE I: Drug has no currently accepted medical use in Treatment in the US.
SCHEDULE II : Drug has a high potential for abuse. Drug has accepted medical use (with severe restrictions). Drug may lead to severe physical dependence or addiction.
Ex: Amphetamine and methylphenidate, fentanyl, oxycodone, hydromorphone, morphine, and secobarbital
SCHEDULE III :Drug has a high potential for abuse.Drug has accepted medical use (with restrictions).Drug may lead to moderate to high physical dependence or addiction.Ex: Buprenorphine, anabolic steroids and combination drugs like
hydrocodone/acetaminophen, and codeine/acetaminophen
SCHEDULE IV: Drug has lower potential for abuse /addiction. (Ex: Benzodiazepines) SCHEDULE V: Drug has lower potential for abuse/addiction (Ex: Cough syrups
w/Codeine)16
Prevention Priority Area: Reduce Rx Drug abuse
RX Drug Barry Branch Calhoun Cass Kazoo S. Joe VB YRBS-MI
Use of Rx Drugs w/o Medical Prescription in the last 30 days (High school)
Use of Rx Drugs w/o Medical Prescription: Life-time use (Middle School)
Source: 2012 MiPHY
Prevention Priority Area: Reduce Rx Drug abuse
18Source: 2012 MiPHY
Pain Kill. Stimul/ADHD
Barbit. Steroids Pain Kill. Stimul/ADHD
Steroids0%
4%
8%
12%
16% Rx drug use w/o a prescription
Barry
Branch
Calhoun
Cass
Kazoo
S. Joe
VB
High School
Middle School
Rx Drug abuse: Contributing Factors
19Source: NIDA (Study on Rx Abuse: Dec/2011)
What is Driving high prevalence of non-medical use of Rx drugs?
1. Misperception of safety: They are prescribed by a doctor! . . . They are made in pharmaceutical labs!
2. Increased availability of Rx drugs in the household (See graph)*
3. Lack of community resources for disposal of unused/expired meds
4. Patterns of prescription of addictive meds by medical professionals are not consistent with guidelines for responsible/ safe prescribing (ONDCP/White House: 2011 “Epidemic/Crisis Doc.)
Rx Drug abuse: Household Availability of Rx Drug
20
Barry Branch Calhoun Cass Kazoo S. Joe VB0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
3,851,1882,913,727
11,313,153
2,434,791
17,952,424
4,197,820
7,539,894
Units (Pills)
Average Per household: 190 Units (CA Area); 203 Units (Michigan)
MAPS: Volume of Scheduled II, III RX drugs in the CA Area
From 1991 to 2010, prescriptions for stimulants increased from 5 to 45 million; for opioid painkillers from 75.5 to 209.5 million.
Over 50% (in some cases 70% ) of "nonmedical users" of pain relievers, tranquil. stimulants, and sedatives obtained RX drugs from a friend or relative, for free.”
Prevention Priority Area: Reduce Rx Drug abuse (Community
Strengths)Please list:#1) Strengths & Assets
(characteristics and Resources, etc) of this community which can be used to prevent/reduce non-medical use of Rx Drugs.
#2) Actions and Ideas that this group can plan and implement in the next 12 months to help prevent, mitigate and reduce non-medical use of Rx Drugs in this County.
21
Another Priority Area: Reduce Marijuana use
Back to the SA Treatment Data Graph (Kazoo CA area, FY 2011)
BarryBranch
CalhounCass
KazooS. Jo
e VBCA Area
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Alcohol
Coc.
mj
Heroin
Oth Opioid
Meth
Stim/Oth
Source: TEDS 201122
Prevention Priority Area:Reduce Marijuana use
Source: MIPHY 201223
B B C K S. VB Y Y0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2012
2010
Marijuana use in the past 30 days (High School)
Marijuana Use: Contributing Factors amongst
youth
24Source: 2012 MIPHY
Risk0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perception or Risk: marijuana X tobacco
Barr
y Branch
Cass
Kzoo
Black fill: mj;Gray fill: Tobacco
Calhoun
SJ VB
Marijuana Use: Other Contributing Factors
25
1. (Social Access): HS/School-aged youth in this county report that getting marijuana is "sort of easy or very easy": HS (57.2%); MS (17.8%); Trend (2010): HS (53.6%); MS (16.7%).
2. Decreasing perception of risk and of the harmful consequences of marijuana use by the public in general linked to the Michigan Medical Marihuana law (more social acceptance of non-medical use of mj);
3. Increased illegal availability of marijuana as residual consequence of the MMML.