A Web-based Survey to Evaluate the Aesthetic Impact of the Golden Ratio Gaganjit Singh Mario Verdicchio Mario Arrigoni Neri
Jan 05, 2016
A Web-based Survey to Evaluate the Aesthetic Impact of the Golden Ratio
Gaganjit SinghMario Verdicchio
Mario Arrigoni Neri
Our objective
Perform an Internet survey
to check whether abstract designs based
on the golden ratio are preferred by our
subjects
Related work
A. Ajluni, C. Martin, and A. Yalamarthy,
“A Study on AdultFemale Human
Perception of the Golden Ratio in
Paintings using Psychological Survey”
vs.
Shortcoming
The compared paintings are different on so
many levels, we cannot attribute the
choice on the sole golden ration factor
More related work
A. Dumitrescu, “Experiment for the rediscovery of the
perfect proportion of rectangle”
Shortcoming
The use of cardboard rectangles
with different ratios hardly constitutes an aesthetic
experience
Moreover
Subjects of first test:105 Parisian womenSubjects of second
test:57 students
of a technical university
We wanted more
More subjects from different
contextsMore aesthetic
experience than isolated rectangles
but without too many other interfering
factors
To have more subjects
An Internet-based international survey
with invitations spread out
by means of email and social networks
To have more aesthetic experience focused on rectangles
A generative algorithm to create abstract compositions with
rectangles
Please check
cs.unibg.it/GenerativeTest
Test 1
vs.
Test 2
vs.
Test 3
vs.
Results660 test subjectsfrom 27 different
countriesRussia, UK, Italy,
India, Switzerland, Ukraine, USA,
Argentina, Germany, Canada, Greece, Japan, Sweden,
Belarus, France, Netherlands, Spain,…
Results
By far the biggest survey
on the golden ratio ever performed
Results
But…
Results 1
Goldenon the right
Goldenon theleft
58%wins
57%win
s
Results 2
58%wins
51%win
s
Goldenon the right
Goldenon theleft
Results 3
51%wins
41%lose
s
Interpreting the results
Although we tried to leave out any other
aesthetic factor than
the rectangle ratio there seem to be at
least two interfering issues
Space-filling [S]
Subjects prefer compositions that fill
the available space in a better way:
not too empty, not overcrowded
Ergonomics [R]
As most of the subjects are right-
handed (87%) when undecided
there is a tendency to click on the right
Interpreting the results
A combination of these two factors seems to offer an explanation
of the results
Results 1
+[S]+[R]
+[S]-
[R]
58%wins
57%win
s
Results 2
58%wins
51%win
s
+[S]+[R]
+[S]-
[R]
Results 3
51%wins
41%lose
s
Conclusions
Instead of providing indications on the golden ratio, our
test yielded two more hypotheses to test,
about composition and about ergonomy
Challenge
To design a test that isolates one of several
factors that affect
our aesthetic experience
Thank you