A Walk through the World of Participatory Monitoring and ... · A Walk through the World of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation ... Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation ...

1

A Walk through the World of Participatory Monitoring and

Evaluation

UNITAR 2012 Fellowship Program for

Afghanistan Phil Cox

(www.plannet.ca)

2

Evaluate…?

•  “To form an idea of the amount or value of; assess.” (Oxford English Dictionary)

3

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) - What is it?

•  A form of inquiry whose focus is some evaluand (program, process, organization, person, etc) which results in “merit” and/or “worth” judgments about it. (Guba and Lincoln, 2001) –  Merit = intrinsic quality (sourced within itself, rather than

because of associations) –  Worth = extrinsic quality (sourced from its interactive effects

with its context)

4

Evaluation - Critical Questions

•  What gets evaluated? •  Who makes the judgment? •  On what criteria? •  For what purpose?

Why are these so important?

5

Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (PME) - What is it? •  A set of principles and a process of

engagement in the monitoring and evaluation endeavour

6

PME - Key Features

•  Evaluation “process” is as important as the “content”

•  Local people are “actors” not “subjects” •  Evaluators can be insiders or outsiders, or

both –  Outside evaluators are facilitators or catalysts who

share, rather than hold power –  Insider evaluators know the project well

•  Evaluation Inquiry must be locally relevant and as unhurried as possible

7

PME - Key Features •  Inquiry methodology must be respectful of

different ways of knowing and cognizant of power dynamics

•  Making sense of the data requires lots of dialogue/iteration

•  Findings and conclusions need validation - those who participate in the inquiry should be included in the analysis

8

Conventional M&E vs PME - Contrasts

Empowerment - to help people initiate, navigate, control

Accountability - to address donor requirements

More frequent, small scale evaluations

Usually Mid and End of Project

Self-evaluation, simple methods adapted to local conditions; open, immediate sharing of results through local involvement

Focus on scientific objectivity, evaluator distanced from other participants; delayed and limited access to results

People identify their own indicators of success

Predetermined indicators of success

Community members, project staff, facilitator(s)

External experts

Participatory Conventional

Why

When

How

What

Who

Adapted from Narayan-Parker, 1993: 12 (taken from Estrella and Gaventa, 1998)

9

One point of view about PME K

•  Participatory Methods, a Qualified OK… –  Advantages…"

•  Low cost. •  Can be conducted quickly. •  Provides flexibility to explore new ideas.

–  Disadvantages… "•  Findings usually relate to specific communities or

localities thus difficult to generalize from findings. "•  Less valid, reliable, and credible than formal surveys.

(World Bank, 2004) •  Labour intensive and costly

10

Another Point of View about PME J

•  If facilitated well, participatory methods of inquiry may yield more accurate and reliable information than more ‘conventional’ methods - such as (randomized) households surveys.

•  Participatory methods (e.g. mapping, ranking, theatre improv.) address limitations of: –  Intimidation - questions “out of nowhere” –  Inconvenience - “many questions” –  Local Relevance - questions often based on externally

derived indicators (Mayoux & Chambers, 2006) •  Maybe more labour intensive and costly, but worth it

to the extent that it fully engages stakeholders and propels the project forward

11

Evaluation – Conventional vs Participatory?

1.  Have you experienced evaluation in one form or another?

2.  Was it (were they) more classical or participatory? How so?

3.  What do you think are the most important considerations when designing an evaluation?

12

PME Purposes

•  Understand changes in organizations or

communities •  Show how stakeholders view the project from

their vantage point, and engage them in dialogue

•  Generate insight for project management •  Address accountability relationships

13

PME - Process

1.  Deciding to use PME - Considerations 2.  Building a PME Team 3.  Making a PME Plan 4.  Collecting the Data 5.  Synthesizing, Analysing and Verifying the

Data 6.  Planning Forward

14

1. Deciding to use PME…

•  Under what circumstance might you not want to employ participatory approaches?

•  M and E approach should be consistent with the way in which the program/project has been designed and implemented

15


•  Important to situate the actors and their interests - those –  funding –  implementing –  participating and benefiting

Donor/funder

Evaluator/facilitator Implementor & community(ies)

16


•  When in the program or project cycle would it be best to start thinking about PME design?

•  Up front, when the program/project is being designed

17

1. Deciding to use PME- Key Consideration

•  The level of rapport and trust –  within the implementing team –  between the implementing team and main

community stakeholders

•  The greater the rapport / trust… –  the easier it will be to evaluate together –  the more can be done - breadth, depth

18

2. Building a PME Team

•  Insiders - What can they bring to the evaluation table?

•  On the positive side… – Deep knowledge of project implementation – Local knowledge (community) – A forward perspective - a stake in the

future

19


•  Insiders - What can they bring to the evaluation table?

•  On the LESS positive side… – A singular or narrow perspective – A vested interest – Their position of power (over)

20


•  Outsiders - What can they bring to the evaluation table?

•  On the positive side… –  Curiosity from an independent vantage point –  A perspective, uncluttered by project detail

“can see the forest not just the trees” –  An ability to facilitate an evaluative process - to encourage

dialogue, to challenge, to mediate –  Local knowledge/ appropriate cultural perspectives

independent of the project

21


•  Outsiders - What can they bring to the evaluation table?

•  On the LESS positive side… –  They don’t (or can’t) really understand the project

and its context –  They bring their outside ideas in too strong and

make in inappropriate assumptions

22


•  A Joint Team - a balancing act… – Disinterest - Vested Interest – Distance - Closeness – General - Particular

23


•  Co-evaluators…How many is too many?

•  Procedurally awkward with too many •  Best to engage stakeholder

representatives in specific areas of inquiry - on matters most pertinent to them

24

3. Making a PME Plan •  Behind most projects

lurks a logic model –  Important to know

•  Who created it and how •  How much people use it

–  Tension - how much to follow the logic model and its indicators?

•  Reconciling top down and bottom up perspectives

•  Prescriptive vs Emergent

25

Results Logic Models Love them or Hate them?

Have you ever created a logic model? or had to work with one? How would you describe the experience?

L K J

26

3. Making a PME Plan •  Orientation

–  Clarify purpose of the Monitoring and Evaluation

–  Get a sense of the overall project (logic model)

–  Generate stakeholder questions

–  Explore possible inquiry methods, sources, timeframes

27

3. Making a PME Plan

•  Team Building/ Training –  Rare, but great if you

can do it! •  Builds trust,

confidence and skills in some of the information gathering methods.

28

4. Collecting the Data

•  Conventional Methods - surveys, focus groups, observation, document reviews, counts, etc.

•  Participatory Reflection and Action Methods - modeling/mapping, ranking exercises, calendars, walks, historical profiles

29

4. Collecting the Data

•  Participatory Reflection and Action Methods - modeling/mapping, ranking exercises, calendars, walks, historical profiles

30

4. Collecting the Data - considerations

•  Important to guard against… – Being too extractive - asking too many

questions framed by outsiders – Large, imposing groups moving through

communities –  Interruptions to peoples’ daily routines – Springing PRA exercises on unsuspecting

groups – Overuse, of the PRA “toolbox” - contrived

31

4. Collecting the Data - Images

•  Mapping communities –  Showing before and

after differences •  Land use •  Housing •  Community

Infrastructure •  Boundaries and

contested areas

32


•  Mapping Bodies –  Showing before and

after differences •  Anatomy •  Reproductive cycles •  Reproductive health

issues

33


•  Encountering Unanticipated Indicators of Success –  Literacy Outcome - A

shift from thumb prints to signatures in the record book

34


•  Bringing Stakeholders Together –  Using the evaluation

as a means to build bridges, explore new possibilities

35

Data Collection What has worked for you?

•  Describe a moment when you felt like you were getting very good information

•  What were you doing to make this so?

36

5. Synthesizing, Analyzing and Validating Data

•  PME generates lots of data, simply because of the … –  number of people

acting as co-evaluators

–  and variety of different encounters that might take place in the course of a day

37


•  Daily debriefs are essential –  Informal and relaxed,

but facilitated to ensure each co-evaluator has their turn

–  Project logic model, key evaluation questions a helpful organizing tool

38


•  Daily debriefs… – An opportunity to…

•  Identify information/learning gaps – Conflicting or contradictory information – Unanswered questions – Unheard perspectives

•  Allocate information gathering tasks –  Places to go –  People to see –  Areas of inquiry to pursue

39


•  Reporting back preliminary findings… –  An obligation to share findings with

those who engage with the evaluation

•  Community •  Project Team •  Project as a Whole •  Organization

–  Important to place emphasis on findings that are relevant at each level

–  Idea is to validate and/or elaborate on insights generated to date

40

6. Planning Forward

– All being well, corrective or reinforcing decisions are being taken by project stakeholders even before the main evaluation report is written… •  In PME the distance between evaluation

and planning is (should be) short

41

Discussion…

– Each take a minute to write down 3 key ideas that you would take into your next evaluation

– Share at the table – Prepare for a short plenary discussion

A Walk through the World of Participatory Monitoring and ... · A Walk through the World of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation ... Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation ...

Documents