A Ticket to the City
Prepared for
Professor Kristen Gates
in partial fulfillment of DAI 505: Industrial Research and Development
by
Benjamin F. Brustis
Department of Design and Industry College of Creative Arts
San Francisco State University San Francisco, CA 94132
May 2003
ABSTRACT
Descriptors: San Francisco, pubic transportation, mass transportation, tourism, bus, trolley,
subway, cable car, streetcar, tramway, rapid transit, MUNI, BART, San Francisco Municipal
Railway, Bay Area Rapid Transit.
Abstract: San Francisco, a city of only about 793,600 people, has a complex public
transportation system comprised of buses, trolleys, tramways, cable cars, underground subway
and streetcars, and rapid transit BART. All together, they carry an average of 700,000 passengers
on a daily basis. Those seven different means of public mass transportation require no less than
ten different kinds of tickets that may or may not be compatible with all or some of the
transportations depending on the case. This makes it confusing and problematic for new users
and millions of tourists annually to easily understand that system and make the best use-for-the-
money of it. The purpose of this research was to identify and develop the best prototype of a
visual medium in order to easily and quickly familiarize new users and tourists with the different
kinds of tickets available and their compatibilities with the SF public transportation system
(MUNI metro (subway) and streetcars, buses, trolleys, tramways, cable cars, BART).
One of the major findings of the study was not to confuse information with too much
information. Research showed that people who are given a too detailed account of the situation
tend to become overwhelmed and not get anything from the supposedly helpful information
brochure. In order to be the most efficient, information design has to be kept to a minimum
necessary amount so that users can actually feel like they are capable of processing it.
Also, during field investigations, it appeared quite clear that people did not want a full bulky
brochure that they would probably end up not using or even throwing away a few days later.
63% of those who wanted to have more information about tickets compatibilities preferred a
credit card size flyer. Because of this discovered concept of selective information, it became
thus possible to design a smaller size visual medium that could meet the needs and wants of the
target audience while still accomplishing the goals set in the study.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Appendices .. i
Chapter 1: The Problem . 1
1.1 Introduction .. 1
1.2 Problem Statement ... 2
1.3 Purpose of the Study .... 2
1.4 Significance (Need) of the Study . 3
1.5 Assumptions . 3
1.6 Definition of Terms .. 4
1.7 Parameters of the Problem ... 5
1.8 Parameters of the Design . 6
1.9 Hypothesis .... 7
1.10 Research Procedure .... 8
1.11 Chapter Summary .. 9
Chapter 2: Findings From the Internet, Review of Literature,
Interviews, and Field Investigation .. 9
2.1 Introduction .....10
2.2 Websites Data Collection: The Complexity of the System ... 10
2.2.1 MUNI Tickets and Fares System: ... 10
2.2.1.1 Basic fares: .. 10
2.2.1.2 Cable car fares: 11
2.2.1.3 Passes: .. 11
2.2.1.4 Transfers: ..... 12
2.2.1.5 Tokens: ..... 12
2.2.1.6 Youth Fifteen-Ride Ticket Booklets: ... 13
2.2.1.7 Passports: . 13
2.2.1 8 CityPass: .. 13
2.2.1.9 Transferring from BART: 14
2.2.2 BART Tickets and Fares System: ... 24
2.3 Review of Literature: Design Options and Issues: 16
2.3.1 Survey and Evaluation of Information Graphics: ... 16
2.3.2 Visual Information Design for an International Audience:
Colors and Symbols: ... 19
2.3.3 The Appeal of Advertising Flyer Graphics: 20
2.3.4 Mass Transportation Marketing Strategy: .. 21
2.4 Field Investigation: Interviews and Statistical Data: . 22
2.4.1 San Francisco Convention Visitor Bureau (SFCVB): 22
2.4.2 Statistical Analysis of Field Interviews Collected Data: .23
2.5 Chapter Summary: ..... 25
Chapter 3: A Two-Sided Foldable Credit Card Size Flyer .. 26
3.1 Chapter Introduction: . 26
3.2 Hypothesis: .... 26
3.3 Parameters of the Design: .. 27
3.4 The Solution to the Problem: A Two-Sided Foldable Credit Card Size Flyer ...27
3.4.1 Format: .... 27
3.4.2 Colors, Fonts and Symbols: .... 28
Chapter 4: Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations of the Study 30
4.1 Problem Statement: 30
4.2 Purpose of the Study: . 30
4.3 Hypothesis: .... 31
4.4 Major Findings: .. 31
4.5 Conclusion and Final Recommendations: . 32
Bibliography .... 33
A Ticket to the City i
List of Appendices:
Appendix A: Survey Data and Completed Survey Questionnaire Examples ..... 38
Appendix B: Initial Sketches for Flyer Design .... 45
Appendix C: Final Design of the Flyer 48
A Ticket to the City 1
CHAPTER I
The Problem
1.1 Introduction
San Francisco, a city of only about 793,600 people (census, 2000), has a complex public
transportation system comprised of buses, trolleys, tramways, cable cars, underground subway
and streetcars, and rapid transit BART. All together, they carry an average of 700,000 passengers
on a daily basis (San Francisco Visitor Information Bureau, 2003). Those seven different means
of public mass transportation require different kinds of tickets that may or may not be compatible
with some or all of the transportations, depending on the case.
Confused first-time users and tourists may have difficulties addressing this issue and thus
maximizing the financial efficiency of their public transportation experience.
1.2 Problem Statement
The incompatibilities between the no less than ten different kinds of tickets of the SF public
transportation system make it confusing and problematic for new users and millions of tourists
annually (15.6 millions in 2001, San Francisco Visitor Information Bureau, 2003) to easily
understand that system and make the best use-for-the-money of it.
A Ticket to the City 2
A certain familiarity with the system is necessary in order to make the most efficient use of it,
but this only comes overtime, time that new users and tourists have not yet had.
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this research was to identify and develop the best prototype of a visual
medium in order to easily and quickly familiarize new users and tourists with the different kinds
of tickets available and their compatibilities with the SF public transportation system (MUNI
metro (subway) and streetcars, buses, trolleys, tramways, cable cars, BART).
1.4 Significance (Need) of the Study
This was an important problem to study because a lot of first time users and tourists seem to
become understandably frustrated with the SF public transportation system, as they are trying to
figure out why a certain type of ticket that is valid on one kind of transportation is not valid on
another kind, but a different kind of ticket may be.
The wrong choice of ticket is not only cost ineffective, but most importantly it adds to the
customers dissatisfaction with the system. Customers that are left in the dark, frustrated and
dissatisfied are less likely to remain loyal.
A Ticket to the City 3
1.5 Assumptions
- Based on the daily number of passengers the SF public transportation system carries, it is
assumed that a significant proportion of new-comers and tourists rely on public transportation.
- The target population is aware of the different kinds of public transportations available within
the limits of the city. The problem was in the misunderstanding of the incompatibilities between
tickets, not in the awareness of the system itself.
- The target population, whether English-speaking or not, is assumed to have at least a tourist
level English understandability. In other words, people are assumed to understand and
recognize basic words like bus, ticket, MUNI, BART, and the like. Every effort was
made to keep the medium as universal as possible.
1.6 Definition of Terms
In an effort to avoid confusion and misunderstanding, the following terms are defined here as
a reference (American Public Transportation Association, 2002):
Aerial Tramway An electric system of aerial cables with suspended unpowered passenger
vehicles. The vehicles are propelled by separate cables attached to the
vehicle suspension system and powered by engines or motors at a
central location not on board the vehicle.
A Ticket to the City 4
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit
Base Fare The price charged to one adult for one transit ride; excludes transfer
charges, zone charges, express service charges, peak period surcharges
and reduced fares.
Bus (Motorbus) A rubber-tired, self-propelled, manually-steered vehicle with fuel supply
carried on board the vehicle.
Bus, Trolley An electric, rubber-tired transit vehicle, manually steered, propelled by a
motor drawing current through overhead wires from a central power
source not on board the vehicle. Also known as "trolley coach" or
"trackless trolley."
Cable Car An electric railway operating in mixed street traffic with unpowered,
individually-controlled transit vehicles propelled by moving cables located
below the street surface and powered by engines or motors at a central
location not on board the vehicle.
MUNI San Francisco Municipal Railway
Public Transit
System
An organization that provides transportation services owned, operated,
or subsidized by any municipality, county, regional authority, state, or
other governmental agency, including those operated or managed by a
private management firm under contract to the government agency
owner.
A Ticket to the City 5
Public
Transportation
Transportation by bus, rail, or other conveyance, either publicly or
privately owned, which provides to the public general or special service
on a regular and continuing basis. Also known as "mass transportation,"
"mass transit" and "transit."
Rapid Transit Rail or motorbus transit service operating completely separate from all
modes of transportation on an exclusive right-of-way.
Streetcar An electric railway with a "light volume" traffic capacity compared to
heavy rail. Light rail may use shared or exclusive rights-of-way, high
or low platform loading and multi-car trains or single cars. Also known as
"streetcar," "trolley car" and "tramway."
Subway An electric railway with the capacity for a "heavy volume" of traffic and
characterized by exclusive rights-of-way, multi-car trains, high speed
and rapid acceleration, sophisticated signaling and high platform loading.
Also known as "rapid rail," "subway," "elevated (railway)" or
"metropolitan railway (metro)."
Tourist One that makes a tour for pleasure or culture.
1.7 Parameters of the Problem
This research was limited to identify and develop a prototype of the best visual medium
necessary to solve the problem. The purpose of the research did not encompass the total cost or
the means of implementation of the developed solution on a large scale, in this case the city of
A Ticket to the City 6
San Francisco. How the medium would be distributed, where, when and by whom, how much it
would cost to manufacture and compensate the people involved, and thus the total cost supported
by the city vs. advertisers would be beyond the scope of this study.
1.8 Parameters of the Design
Considering that the medium is in the line of other public transportation informational
brochures that are distributed for free, the solution also had to free and therefore made of paper
or cardboard that could easily and rapidly be manufactured at the lowest cost to the supporting
parties. In an effort to further limit the printing costs, a limited number of colors had to be
favored, without depreciating the overall visual appeal of the medium.
Other options, like lamination, would certainly add to the appeal and durability, but as they
would also drive up the total costs, they were only considered as a recommendation.
1.9 Hypothesis
Based on the review of literature and prior to the interviews of the intended target audience
and management at the San Francisco Convention Visitor Bureau, a potential solution to the
problem was to develop a print visual medium that would make the best use of information
graphics and design rules in order to quickly and efficiently convey an easily understandable
message to the target audience.
A Ticket to the City 7
1.10 Research Procedure
The steps undertook during this research procedure were as follow:
1) Research literature, journals, articles, or dissertations that could be related to the topic.
2) Interview management at the SF Visitor Information Bureau.
3) Draft a precise questionnaire in English, French and Japanese, trying to pinpoint what people
are confused about, and which hypothetical solution they would prefer based on the literature
review materials.
4) Analyze the data collected from the interviews, and come up with a comprehensive design that
fits all requirements.
5) Print the prototype.
6) Make additional recommendations if necessary.
1.11 Chapter Summary
As stated previously, the incompatibilities between all the different kinds of tickets of the SF
public transportation system make it confusing and problematic for new users and tourists to
easily understand that system and make the best use-for-the-money of it. A certain familiarity
with the system is necessary in order to make the most efficient use of it, but this only comes
overtime, time that new users and tourists have not yet had. The purpose of this study was to
identify and develop the best prototype of a visual medium in order to easily and quickly
A Ticket to the City 8
familiarize those new users and tourists with the different kinds of tickets available and their
compatibilities within the SF public transportation system (MUNI metro (subway) and streetcars,
buses, trolleys, tramways, cable cars, BART).
Chapter two analyzes the findings gathered from the review of literature, interviews of
management at the San Francisco Visitor Information Bureau, and interviews of an international
panel of tourists found in the streets of San Francisco. Based on those findings, chapter three
introduces the solution to the problem. Finally, chapter four summarizes the study and makes
final recommendations based on the solution proposed in chapter three.
A Ticket to the City 9
CHAPTER II
Findings From the Internet, Review of Literature, Interviews, and Field Investigation
2.1 Introduction
Chapter two is articulated in three parts:
- First, information collected from various websites is presented to explain the current state of the
San Francisco public transportation system and to support the above stated claim of complexity
of such a system,
- Second, review of literature is presented to explore how related design problems were solved in
the past and thus the different design options available to solve the current problem, as well as
the general design issues that must be addressed and that are relevant to the problem at hand,
- Third, statistical data and findings from interviews with the intended target are presented,
bringing to light what specific issues must be solved and its expectations on how they should be.
A Ticket to the City 10
2.2 Websites Data Collection: The Complexity of the System:
2.2.1 MUNI Tickets and Fares System:
According to MUNIs official website (2003), the different kinds of tickets and fares are as
follow:
2.2.1.1 Basic fares:
Exact change is required and no change is given. Subway turnstiles require coins (all
denominations of US coins accepted, including dollar coins).
Adult: $1.00, or Muni monthly pass, Passport, token or transfer
o Senior, ages 65+; Youth, ages 5-17: 35 or monthly pass or transfer. Valid ID required.
o Customers with a disability: 35 or monthly sticker affixed to a valid Regional Transit
Discount card or transfer. Valid ID required.
o Child, ages 4 and under: Free
Cash fare includes a free transfer issued on request at the time the fare is paid. J, K, L, M and N
riders must have a transfer for proof of payment.
A Ticket to the City 11
2.2.1.2 Cable car fares:
No transfers are accepted nor issued. All persons are $2.00 each way
Seniors, ages 65+, and disabled persons may ride for $1 from 9 p.m. to 7 a.m. with a valid photo
I.D. Monthly passes and Passports are valid on cable cars. Weekly passes require a payment of
$1. Cable cars also accept 1 token and $1. Limited edition souvenir cable car tickets are also
available. Cable car tickets and one-day Muni passes are sold by the conductors on the cable
cars. The conductors can make change for up to $20.
2.2.1.3 Passes:
For regular riders,: monthly Fast Passes and weekly passes are available:
- Monthly Fast Pass: Good for one calendar month, with a 3-day grace period into the next
month (e.g., the June pass is good from June 1 through July 3). Valid on all Muni streetcars,
buses, and cable cars.
o Adult, ages 18-64: $35. Also valid with the following agencies (no 3-day grace period):
BART and Caltrain for trips entirely within San Francisco; SamTrans route 34 when
boarding in San Francisco
o Senior, ages 65 and over: $8
o Disabled, monthly sticker affixed to a valid Regional Transit Discount card: $8
o Youth, ages 5-17: $8
A Ticket to the City 12
- Weekly pass: Good for one week, from Monday through Sunday. Valid for unlimited use on all
Muni lines. Cost is $9 for each week. There are no senior, disabled, or youth weekly passes. You
must pay an additional $1 to ride the cable cars. Using any Muni Pass on Special Services
requires an additional payment of $2.
2.2.1.4 Transfers:
Transfers are issued when the fare is paid and are valid for travel on any Muni vehicle (except
Cable Cars) for at least 90 minutes but for no more than two hours, from the time of issue.
Transfers are not required to be surrendered to the operator of the vehicle. Transfers are
considered Proof of Payment on Metro lines. Transfers are not valid on cable cars.
2.2.1.5 Tokens:
Tokens are cheaper and easier than carrying one-dollar bills. The tokens sell in bags of 10 for
$8, only 80 cents a ride. The tokens have no time expiration, and you can get a free transfer with
them. Cable cars accept one token plus $1, with no transfer issued. A list of vendors that sell
tokens is available.
A Ticket to the City 13
2.2.1.6 Youth Fifteen-Ride Ticket Booklets:
Youth Fifteen-Ride Ticket Booklets are available for $5.25 for the convenience of schools
and youth groups. The tickets are not good for cable car service. They are sold at Muni's
Revenue window at 949 Presidio Ave. at Geary, Room 103.
2.2.1.7 Passports :
Enjoy unlimited travel on San Francisco's world-famous transit system. Ride streetcars, buses,
and cable cars as many times a day as you wish with your Passport. Passports are also valid on
Special Services with an additional payment of $2. The 1 day pass is $6, the 3 day pass is $10
and the 7 day pass is $15.
2.2.1 8 CityPass:
The San Francisco CityPass is good for seven consecutive days on Muni and is also good for
admission to several attractions in the city. The CityPass costs $34.75 for adults and $25.75 for
youths (ages 5-17) and is available at those attractions, at the Visitor Information Center at
Powell & Market Streets, and at Muni's Revenue Department, 949 Presidio Avenue at Geary.
A Ticket to the City 14
2.2.1.9 Transferring from BART:
If you travel on BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) and then plan to take Muni, make sure you
pick up a discounted transfer which will give you a round-trip for the price of a one-way! Before
you exit the BART paid area, go to the white Muni transfer machine near the add-fare machines.
Put in four quarters and out comes a two-part ticket: one part will allow a ride on Muni away
from BART within one hour. Keep the other portion for your trip back to BART. You have 72
hours to use the return portion. Each part of the ticket MUST be exchanged for a transfer by a
Muni operator or station agent upon use. An additional $1 is necessary for cable car service. The
two-part discount tickets are free at the Daly City BART Station, but are good for service only
on Muni lines 28 and 54, with no transfers issued.
2.2.2 BART Tickets and Fares System:
According to BARTs official website (2003), BART tickets are like debit cards, each with a
specific stored value. When taking a BART trip, the fare is deducted from the ticket
automatically until the stored value is used up. All BART stations sell tickets through automatic
ticket machines that accept nickels, dimes and quarters as well as $1, $5, $10 and $20 bills.
Credit cards can also be used at Charge-A-Ticket (CAT) machines in selected stations. BART's
fare structure is built on a mileage-based formula, therefore weekly or monthly passes for BART
A Ticket to the City 15
fare are not available. However, BART offers discounts ranging from 6.25% to 75% as described
below.
- BART Blue High Value Tickets: 6.25% discount on two ticket denominations:
Cost: $32 ticket costs $30, $48 ticket costs $45.
- BART Red Tickets:75% discount for persons with disabilities and children 5 to 12 years old:
Cost: $16 ticket costs $4, children 4 and under are free.
- BART Green Tickets: 75% discount for senior citizens 65 years and older:
Cost: $16 ticket costs $4.
- BART Orange Tickets: BART orange tickets provide discounts for middle and secondary
school students.
Cost: special purchasing restrictions apply...
- BART Plus Tickets: BART Plus tickets can be used as a "flash pass" for other transit operators.
The BART Plus ticket is good on BART, AC Transit (excluding transbay service), County
Connection, Dumbarton Express (excluding transbay service), Martinez Link, SamTrans (local-
fare credit), Santa Clara County Transit local service, SF Muni and Union City Transit. The
BART Plus ticket works in the BART fare gates like a regular BART ticket, and is valid for a
half-month period as a "flash pass" to bus operators and SF Muni station agents. Part A covers
the first half of the month and Part B covers the second half. The BART Plus ticket comes in
eight different denominations, each valid for a half-month period. All denominations include
unlimited local bus rides along with stored BART value:
A Ticket to the City 16
BART Plus Ticket Stored BART Value $28 $15 $33 $20 $37 $25 $42 $30 $47 $35 $52 $40 $56 $45 $61 $50
The BART value on the BART Plus ticket expires five days after the end of the half-month
period. When the remaining value on the BART Plus is as low as 5 cents, people get one final
ride on BART -- no matter how much the fare is. This is called the "Last Ride Bonus."
2.3 Review of Literature: Design Options and Issues:
2.3.1 Survey and Evaluation of Information Graphics:
Easterby and Zwaga (1984) look at how both the theoretical principles and the real world
empirical data affect information design in case studies. The entire book is a valuable foundation
resource for information design, but the research study on the British public bus system
especially was the closest related to the area of research. It appeared that table based information
design proves to be not so easy to design and requires significant attention: It has been known
for some time that many people have great difficulty understanding information presented in
A Ticket to the City 17
tabular form, particularly when the table is a two-dimensional matrix (e.g. the study by Wright
and Fox, 1970, on currency conversion tables).
The needs of bus passengers are also explained in detail, which helps decide whats necessary to
include in the medium. The book claims there are three kinds of information needs to the bus
passenger: information at the departure (help to plan the route), in-transit information (help to
make the right choice), and supportive information (redundant, but help to allay any fear of
getting lost). This research would probably best fit into the second category.
Holmes (1993) provides explanations and examples of effective diagrammatic designs for
diagrams, charts, maps, architecture, as well as other projects. His book shows how artists can
successfully combine a picture with a set of facts in a way that entices the audience and inform
them too. The emphasis is on how much research goes into a diagram so that it has meaning and
so that the reader is informed. Design is not only looks; the original intent of an information
diagram in the understanding of the conveyed information. The purpose of a diagram is to insure
that the reader understands a possibly complex situation quickly and easily.
According to Wildbur (1989), there are six different kinds of information design solutions:
alphanumeric, pictogrammic, product interface, diagrammatic, spatial and cartographic, and
finally informative and explanatory. The section that most related to this research area was the
diagrammatic one, which had a case-study about a map system design for the Municipal
Transport Company of Amsterdam. Although, the purpose of the designers in that project was a
little bit different than the problem at hand (increasing ridership vs. awareness of tickets
A Ticket to the City 18
compatibilities), some of the issues they solved along the way were most useful. For example, in-
depth interviews with riders made them realize the importance of not putting too much on the
map, unlike what had been done with previous maps. It became clear that too much information
leads to no information at all because riders feel overwhelmed and end up not understanding the
map. The point is to include only what is strictly necessary, not the details. Legibility was also
one issue that they had to work with because they wanted a small map that could be carried in
someones pocket.
Zwaga. and Hoonhouts book (1999) was a real wealth of information regarding research
methodology in informational design problems. It presents a wide range of study cases in
different areas of informational design and goes step by step in both the research and the design
processes on how to come to a solution. The part on tables and graphs included a very useful
study on redesigning effective public transportation timetables for the buses and trains of
Brisbane, Australia.. Because it was closely related to this area of research, the dialog approach
the researchers took and the step-by-step research procedure was most useful. Emphasis was put
on interactions and dialogues with users before designing a solution to the problem as a way to
really understand what the users needs and want really are.
A Ticket to the City 19
2.3.2 Visual Information Design for an International Audience: Colors and Symbols:
Miller, Brown. and Cullen (2000) explain how symbols help to tangibly demonstrate the
theoretical and to better communicate socially as humans. Symbols are the symbols for written
communication and have evolved from the most minimalists into complex abstractions. Symbols
now have different meanings to different people in different situations. Symbols carry
informational as well as emotional meanings. They echo our subjective interpretation of the
world and this must be taken in consideration when designing for an international audience. This
book shows that mass communication depends to a great extent on signs and symbols, but some
symbols are culture specific and the designer has to make sure that it will be understood by his
audience in the same way that he intended to communicate.
Wildbur and Burke (1998) emphasize the importance of visually appealing solutions to
information design problems, especially for an international target audience. The fist part of the
book specifically addresses the issue of informing travelers and transportation information
design. In most cases, the use of a powerful color identity scheme and symbols come as a useful
solution to simplify the understanding and processing of otherwise complex information. The
case of the Schwabisch Gmund Bus Stationwas most useful as to understand how colors,
symbols, and even the choice of a certain font work together to efficiently inform a wide variety
of users who may or may not speak the language.
A Ticket to the City 20
2.3.3 The Appeal of Advertising Flyer Graphics:
Gestalten (1997) explores the design of flyers mostly for clubs and bars, but also for other
events and products. The purpose of this book is to appreciate how to design for small spaces, as
it can be difficult to include all the required information on a very limited space while still
conveying the image or (corporate) identity of the event organizer (in this case, the SF public
transportation system). This book is more inspirational than a method on how to make effective
flyers; nonetheless it is beneficial to see how other people have solved space issues in design.
Flyers have an impact similar to that of handbills to be distributed among tourists in a
shopping district on a Saturday afternoon; they are the fastest print medium and can fly directly
into the target group.
Nakazawa and Endo (1996) illustrate the multitude of flyer designs in Japan for a variety of
promotion purposes, including a section on travel flyers that somewhat relate to this area of
research. Unlike the German design approach of Flyer Mania (see above) which limits the flyer
designs to two-sided card designs, the Japanese approach in this book also includes a lot of
multi-folded flyer designs as well as very unusual cuts and flyer formats. There are quite a few
unexpected concepts in this book. These make it for more interesting and catchy flyers,
although they would also drive up the manufacturing costs. The Japanese flyers are sometimes a
little unsettling in their layouts because there is either too much information on the flyer, or it is
uncertain on where the viewer should look first. It reflects a different cultural sensitivity, but for
A Ticket to the City 21
this purpose it should probably be kept simpler, as another book suggests as far as good
informational design is concerned.
2.3.4 Mass Transportation Marketing Strategy:
Lovelock, Lewin, Day. and Bateson (1987) look at public transportation from a marketing
standpoint and cover everything from planning and service design to managing the demand for
public services. But the section that was most of interest as far as this research was concerned
was the one on developing a communication program. The book explains that there are three
roles for communications: to inform, to persuade, and to remind. People cannot be expected to
use a service they do not know about; additionally, they may be unable to use a service properly
without instructions on how to use it (p 157). A communication program can be used to
accomplish three tasks: to build awareness about a service, to communicate specific information
about a service (which is the case here), or to change attitudes. The target audience must be
identified clearly and the goals of the campaign must be carefully thought through before the
communication campaign can be designed successfully. This book was great in terms of strategic
planning in order to avoid surprises down the road.
A Ticket to the City 22
2.4 Field Investigation: Interviews and Statistical Data:
2.4.1 San Francisco Convention Visitor Bureau (SFCVB):
An interview with Mr. John Ontiveros, manager of the SFCVB, showed that a lot of people
come to the SFCVB on a daily basis to inquire about how the SF public transportation system
works and about the various means of transportation. People want to know how to use the
system, where to buy tickets, and what tickets to buy in respect to the different transportations.
They ask about what kinds of tickets they should get depending on where they are planning to
go, and depending on the length of their stay in San Francisco. Mr. Ontiveros said that
employees at the SFCVB are frequently asked about informational brochures about the public
transportation system, but seldomly about transportation agencies contact information.
The SFCVB has its own transportation guides available to the public for free, but those guides
serve a different purpose as they mainly give instructions to get to the major tourist sites. Those
guides also include the costs of the different tickets and contact information for MUNI and
BART. They are available in the five most popular foreign languages: French, German, Spanish,
Japanese and Italian.
What transpired from this interview was the need for a more specifically focused information
brochure than the many broad brochures that the SFCVB already offers its audience. It is
unnecessary to include a map of the system, or directions on how to use the system because other
A Ticket to the City 23
brochures already fill that need. The new medium should solely concentrate on the different
ticket compatibilities with the different forms of transportation.
2.4.2 Statistical Analysis of Field Interviews Collected Data:
A survey was distributed to visitors in the touristy areas of Powell Street at the Cable Car
turnaround and Fishermans Wharf. The selection of the places for the field investigation was
important because the audience had to be unfamiliar with the public transportation system in San
Francisco. The audience does not comprise only tourists, but due to the difficulty of finding
people who just moved to the city, these areas were therefore selected on purpose in order to try
to reach mainly an audience of tourists who, by nature, are not familiar with the SF public
transportation system. People were asked if they were visiting San Francisco, in which case only
they answered the survey.
The five most popular languages for tourists in San Francisco, aside from English, being
French, German, Spanish, Japanese and Italian, an effort was made to try to reach a more
international audience. The survey was translated and then distributed to a sample of fifty (50)
people in English, French and Japanese (see appendix A for samples).
Results were as follow:
- 66% of respondents have a public transportation system in their own city/town, but 50%
of those never use it, which can account for an unfamiliarity with public transportation
systems.
A Ticket to the City 24
- Most respondents claimed they were confidents (33%) or very confidents (33%) about
using the SF public transportation system, but it turned out that 88% did not know about
the different compatibilities/restrictions between tickets and transportations.
- Among the ten different kinds of tickets available, the most people knew about were, as
expected, tickets/transfers and cable and tickets (50%). However, it was quite surprising
that most respondents did not know about the kinds of tickets that are the most targeted to
tourists: nobody knew about Passport, and only 8% knew about CityPass. Only 16%
knew about the Weekly Pass, a useful and very cost effective option for tourists.
- When specific questions were asked about tickets/transportations compatibilities,
between 75% and 92% not surprisingly answered that they did not know the answer to
any of the questions. Those who took their chances and answered the questions mostly
got them wrong.
- Finally, 50% of respondents said that they would like to have more information about the
different kinds of tickets and their compatibilities with the system. Of those, a large
majority of 63% preferred a credit card-size flyer with the minimum amount of
information, far ahead of the 25% who would like a full detailed brochure and of the only
13% who wanted a two-sided large rectangular flyer.
A Ticket to the City 25
2.5 Chapter Summary:
Chapter two served three purposes. First, it showed the complexity of the situation as far as
the multitude of tickets is concerned in the San Francisco public transportation system. Second, it
drew on previous information design issues, research and development protocols in order to
assess all the different options and benefit from what has been done in the past. It showed the
importance of a carefully designed visual medium in terms of choice of colors, symbols, shape,
sizes and choices of fonts, and navigation. Third, it took in consideration inputs from
professionals in the field and from the intended user target so that a solution to the problem could
be designed more efficiently with their needs and wants in mind. Based on those findings,
chapter three introduces the solution to the problem. Finally, chapter four summarizes the study
and makes final recommendations based on the solution proposed in chapter three.
A Ticket to the City 26
CHAPTER THREE
A Two-Sided Foldable Credit Card Size Flyer
3.1 Chapter Introduction:
Chapter three reintroduces the hypothesis of the study so that the proposed solution to the
problem can be compared to it. The initial parameters of the design are also restated to make sure
that the proposed solution fits within those restrictive parameters and potentially additional ones.
In the light of the research presented in chapter two, the solution is then revealed and its
advantages explained.
3.2 Hypothesis:
A the beginning of the study, based on the review of literature and prior to the interviews of
the intended target audience and management at the San Francisco Convention Visitor Bureau, a
potential solution to the problem was to develop a print visual medium that would make the best
use of information graphics and design rules in order to quickly and efficiently convey an easily
understandable message to the target audience.
A Ticket to the City 27
3.3 Parameters of the Design:
Considering that the medium is in the line of other public transportation informational
brochures that are distributed for free, the solution also had to free and therefore made of paper
or cardboard that could easily and rapidly be manufactured at the lowest cost to the supporting
parties. In an effort to further limit the printing costs, a limited number of colors had to be
favored, without depreciating the overall visual appeal of the medium.
Other options, like lamination, would certainly add to the appeal and durability, but as they
would also drive up the total costs, they would only be considered as a recommendation.
3.4 The Solution to the Problem: A Two-Sided Foldable Credit Card Size Flyer
3.4.1 Format:
The statistical data collected from the surveys conducted with the intended audience showed
that 63% of those who wanted to have more information about tickets compatibilities preferred a
credit card size flyer. Initial sketches, available in Appendix B, were developed with a credit card
size format in mind. The advantages of a smaller size medium are indeed threefold:
- First, it costs less to manufacture than a full size brochure because several flyers can be printed
on a single sheet of paper, whereas several sheets of papers and binding are necessary to
manufacture one brochure. Printer costs will be kept down.
A Ticket to the City 28
- Second, it can be distributed more easily and in more places because of the little amount of
space it takes on the shelf. A small flyer can be placed not only at MUNI and BART stations
along with other brochures, at the San Francisco Convention Visitor Bureau, but also in MUNI
buses and BART trains in Take One like displays.
- Third, the main advantage of a credit card size flyer for the user is that he/she can easily place it
in his/her wallet or purse and carry it at all times without any inconvenience. People often
already have several credit cards, Ids and drivers license in their wallet. By placing the flyer
along with them, it is always easily accessible. People will be less likely to misplace it, and by
staying always in a safe location, the flyer will last and be used longer without deteriorations.
Unlike a bulky brochure, the flyer will always be there when the user actually needs it.
3.4.2 Colors, Fonts and Symbols:
Because the flyer is free, manufacturing costs are of big concern. In that respect, a limited
number of colors had to be used in order to keep the printing costs even lower. As a trade-off
between printing costs and visual appeal of the medium, it was decided to go with a four-color
flyer. Since the target audience of the flyer is internationally eclectic, the choice of colors had to
be given some thought because of the emotionally charged symbolism colors can convey for
different people from different cultures. Research from chapter two helped determine that blue,
orange and green do not have any known negative connotations.
The colors/symbols/fonts are as follow:
A Ticket to the City 29
- the MUNI official orange color was used for the MUNI logo and some of the text (titles)
to draw attention,
- the BART official blue was used for the BART logo and gradient background. Blue is
usually thought to have a soothing or relaxing quality which is put to use in the flyer in
order to make the user feel comfortable about using the flyer and not anxious about the
amount of information in it.
- Green was used for the check marks because green is though to be equivalent of yes or
OK or go depending on the culture, but never anything negative. Although the check
mark by itself is not used everywhere in the world as it is in the US (for example,
Japanese use a circle or maru to indicate the equivalent of OK), the color green is
widely understood across the board for that purpose.
- Black was used for the text to increase contrast because of the small size of the flyer.
Black on white, although perhaps dull, is still the most legible combination. With a font
varying from 10 to 8 points, any other color was pretty much out of the question. 6-point
white and bold was used for the fine prints on the blue background because it rendered a
better contrast that black in the particular case. The choice of font is Myriad (roman,
italic, bold, and italic bold) because research done in chapter two showed that round
shaped fonts are easier to read in smaller sizes and that those types of fonts were more
efficient in information design brochures for travelers.
The final full color printed flyer is available in Appendix C.
A Ticket to the City 30
CHAPTER FOUR
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations of the Study
4.1 Problem Statement:
The incompatibilities between the no less than ten different kinds of tickets of the SF public
transportation system make it confusing and problematic for new users and millions of tourists
annually (15.6 millions in 2001) to easily understand that system and make the best use-for-the-
money of it.
A certain familiarity with the system is necessary in order to make the most efficient use of it,
but this only comes overtime, time that new users and tourists have not yet had.
4.2 Purpose of the Study:
The purpose of this research was to identify and develop the best prototype of a visual
medium in order to easily and quickly familiarize new users and tourists with the different kinds
of tickets available and their compatibilities within the SF public transportation system (MUNI
metro (subway) and streetcars, buses, trolleys, tramways, cable cars, BART).
A Ticket to the City 31
4.3 Hypothesis:
At the beginning of the study, based on the review of literature and prior to the interviews of
the intended target audience and management at the San Francisco Convention Visitor Bureau, a
potential solution to the problem was to develop a print visual medium that would make the best
use of information graphics and design rules in order to quickly and efficiently convey an easily
understandable message to the target audience.
4.4 Major Findings:
One of the major findings of the study was not to confuse information with too much
information. Research done in chapter two showed that people who are given a too detailed
account of the situation tend to become overwhelmed and not get anything from the supposedly
helpful information brochure. In order to be the most efficient, information design has to be kept
to a minimum necessary amount so that users can actually feel like they are capable of
processing it.
Also, during field investigations, it appeared quite clear that people did not want a full bulky
brochure that they would probably end up not using or even throwing away a few days later.
Because of this discovered concept of selective information, it became thus possible to design
a smaller size visual medium that could meet the needs and wants of the target audience while
still accomplishing the goals set in the study.
A Ticket to the City 32
4.5 Conclusion and Final Recommendations:
It is the hope of this study that the developed solution will bring a better understanding of the
San Francisco public transportation system as far as tickets compatibilities with the system are
concerned. It will no doubt increase the overall experience and satisfaction of the millions of
annual San Francisco visitors and also new comers who have just moved to the city and are not
yet familiar with the system.
A final recommendation would be to advise MUNI and BART to conduct directed focus
group studies to try to assess the actual efficiency of the developed flyer, by asking people to
answer questions about the public transportation system with and without the help of the
developed flyer. The limited resources and time allocated to this study made it impossible to test
the flyer in such focus groups, let alone in real life situations, but should MUNI and BART be
interested in manufacturing and distributing the flyer, further research like focus groups would
be easy to conduct provided that people are properly compensated. Also, since the flyer contains
a minimal amount of text, it could easily be translated into the five most popular foreign
languages ( ) at a minimal cost.
A Ticket to the City 33
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Books:
Easterby, R. and Zwaga, H. (Eds.) (1984). Information Design: The Design and Evaluation of
Signs and Printed Materials, pp 299-319. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Gestalten, D. (1997). Flyer Mania. Ullstein Buchwerlage GmbH & Co. KG: Berlin.
Holmes, N. (1993). The Best in Diagrammatic Graphics. B.T. Batsford Ltd: London.
Lovelock, C., Lewin, G., Day, G. and Bateson, J. (1987). Marketing Public Transit: A Strategic
Approach, pp 157-180. Praeger Publishers: New York.
Miller, A., Brown, J. and Cullen, C. (2000). Global Graphics: Symbols; Designing with Symbols
for an International Market. Rockport Publishers: Gloucester, Massachusetts.
Nakazawa, T. and Endo, K. (Eds.) (1996). Advertising Flyer Graphics. PIE Books: Tokyo,
Japan.
Wildbur, P.(1989). Information Graphics: a Survey of Typographic, Diagrammatic and
A Ticket to the City 34
Cartographic Communication, pp. 45-76. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company: New York,
New York.
Wildbur, P. and Burke, M. (1998). Information Graphics: Innovative Solutions in Contemporary
Design, pp. 18-53. Thames and Hudson, Inc.: New York, New York.
Zwaga, H., Boersema, T. and Hoonhout, H. (Eds.)(1999). Visual Information for Everyday Use:
Design and Research Perspectives, pp. 177-193. Taylor & Francis, Inc.: Philadelphia, PA.
Websites:
American Public Transportation Association (2002). Glossary of Transit Terminology. Retrieved
on March 5, 2003 from http://www.apta.com/info/online/glossary.htm
Bay Area Census (2003). Retrieved on March 5, 2003 from http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/
Bay Area Rapid Transit (2003). BART Plus Tickets. Retrieved on May 3rd, 2003 from
http://www.bart.gov/tickets/types/typesPlus.asp
Golden Gate University Library (2002). Tourism and Travel Information. Retrieved on March 5,
2003 from http://internet.ggu.edu/university_library/Tourism.html.
A Ticket to the City 35
San Francisco MUNI (2003). Fares and Sales: More Fare Info. Accessed on March 5, 2003.
http://www.sfmuni.com/fares/fareinfo.htm
San Francisco MUNI (2003). Community/Rider Info: Visitor Info. Accessed on March 5, 2003.
http://www.sfmuni.com/rider/visitors.htm
San Francisco MUNI (2003). Community/Rider Info: Rider Tips and Rules. Accessed on March
5, 2003 from http://www.sfmuni.com/rider/ridetips.htm
San Francisco Visitor Information Bureau (2003). Research. Accessed on March 5, 2003 from
http://www.sfvisitor.org/research/index.html
Sources Consulted but not Cited:
Cudahy, B. (1990). Cash, Tokens, and Transfers: A History of Urban Mass Transit in North
America. Fordham University Press: New York.
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (2003). Census 2000 Data & Reports.
http://www.mtc.ca.gov/datamart/census/dp234/Census-Transportation-Related.htm
A Ticket to the City 36
Travel Industry Association of America (2002). Accessed on March 5, 2003 from
http://www.tia.org/travel/
A Ticket to the City 37
APPENDIXES
Appendix A: Completed Survey Questionnaire Examples
Appendix B: Initial Sketches for Flyer Design
Appendix C: Final Design of the Flyer
A Ticket to the City 38
Appendix A: Survey Data and Completed Survey Questionnaire Examples:
- English
- French
A Ticket to the City 39
Question YES NO 1 2 3 4 5 1 66% 33% 2 20% 0% 10% 20% 50% 3 33% 25% 33% 8% 0% 4 16% 8% 40% 25% 8% 6 8% 8% 0% 50% 33% 7 8% 92% 8 8% 92% 11 50% 50% 12 25% 13% 63% 5 Ticket 50% Fass Pass 25% Token 0% Passport 0% Transfer 33% CityPass 8% Cable Car 50% BART Ticket 33% Weekly Pass16% BART Plus Pass 0% 9 0% 25% 75% 0% 8% 92% 0% 16% 84% 0% 33% 66% 8% 0% 92% 25% 0% 75%
A Ticket to the City 40
San Francisco Public Transportation System Survey Name: _______________________________ Age: _______________________________ 1 Is there a public transportation system in your home town/city? ! Yes ! No 2 If yes, how often do you use it?
1 2 3 4 5 Everyday Often Sometimes Rarely Never
3 How confident do you feel about using the San Francisco public transportation system?
1 2 3 4 5 Very confident Pretty
confident Confident Not really
confident Not at all confident
4 How comfortable do you feel with all the different kinds of tickets available in the SF public transportation system?
1 2 3 4 5 Very comfortable Pretty
comfortable Comfortable Not really
comfortable Not at all
comfortable
5 Do you know any of the following tickets/passes/passports? Please check the ones you know:
! Tickets (from vending machines) ! Tokens ! Transfers (from MUNI drivers) ! Cable Car tickets (regular,
collector) ! Weekly pass
! Monthly Fast Pass (adult, senior, disabled, youth)
! Passports (1 day, 3 days, 7 days) ! CityPass (7 days: adult, youth) ! BART tickets ! BART/Plus pass
6 Those different tickets allow you to ride different transportations and have different restrictions. How confident do you feel about your knowledge of those restrictions?
1 2 3 4 5 Very confident Pretty
confident Confident Not really
confident Not at all confident
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSEM!
A Ticket to the City 41 7 Do you know the existence of tokens and their advantages?
! Yes ! No
8 Did you know that you can ride Cable Cars for only $1.80 instead of $2 (one token and $1)?
! Yes ! No
9 Are MUNI passes valid on BART? ! Yes ! No ! I dont know Are MUNI passports valid on BART? ! Yes ! No ! I dont know Are MUNI transfers valid on BART? ! Yes ! No ! I dont know Are BART tickets valid on MUNI? ! Yes ! No ! I dont know Is the BART Plus pass valid on MUNI? ! Yes ! No ! I dont know Can you get a transfer from BART to MUNI?
! Yes ! No ! I dont know
10 What kind of ticket(s) do you presently use? Why this choice? 11 Would you be interested in having a printed material that explains all the different kinds of tickets and their compatibilities with the different transportations of the SF public transportation system?
! Yes ! No ! I dont know
12 If yes, would you prefer to have:
! A brochure that explains it all in great details (lot of info, photos, but takes space) or
! A two-sided large rectangular flyer (some details and few photos) or
! A credit card size flyer with all the minimum necessary information? (small but easily fits in wallet or purse can be carried with you at all times)
Additional comments?
A Ticket to the City 42
Enqute sur le Systme de Transports en Public de San Francisco Nom: _______________________________ ge: _______________________________ 1 Y a-til un systme de transports en public dans votre ville dorigine?
! Oui ! Non
2 Si oui, quelle frquence lutilisez-vous?
1 2 3 4 5 Tous les jours Souvent Quelquefois Rarement Jamais
3 tes-vous sr(e) de vous en ce qui concerne lutilisation du systme de transports en public de San Francisco?
1 2 3 4 5 Trs sr(e) de vous Assez sr(e)
de vous Sr(e) de vous Pas tres sr(e)
de vous Pas du tout
sr(e) de vous
4 Pensez-vous etre assez inform(e) sur tous les differents types de tickets du systme de transports en public de San Francisco?
1 2 3 4 5 Trs bien inform(e) Assez bien
inform(e) Inform(e) Pas tres bien
inform(e) Pas bien
inform(e) du tout
5 Connaissez-vous les tickets/passes/passeports ci-dessous? Cochez ceux que vous connaissez:
! Tickets (vendeurs automatiques) ! Jetons ! Transfers (chauffeurs MUNI) ! Tickets de Cable Cars
(normaux, collections) ! Passes hebdomadaires
! Passes mensuels: Fast Pass (adultes, personnes ages, handicaps, jeunes)
! Passeports (1 jour, 3 jours, 7 jours) ! CityPass (7 jours: adultes, jeunes) ! Tickets de BART ! Passes BART/Plus
6 Les tickets ci-dessus vous permettent de prendre differents moyens de transport et ont des restrictions diffrentes. Etes-vous au courant de toutes ces restrictions?
1 2 3 4 5 Trs au courant Assez au
courant Au courant Pas tres au
courant Pas au courant
du tout
A Ticket to the City 43 TESTEZ VOTRE CONNAISSANCE DU SYSTEME DE TRANSPORTS EN PUBLIC! 7 Connaissez-vous lexistence des jetons et leurs avantages?
! Oui ! Non
8 Saviez-vous que vous pouvez prendre les Cable Cars pour seulement $1.80 au lieu de $2 (un jeton et $1)?
! Oui ! Non
9 Est-ce que les passes MUNI sont valides sur le BART?
! Oui ! Non ! Ne sais pas
Est-ce que les passeports MUNI sont valides sur le BART?
! Oui ! Non ! Ne sais pas
Est-ce que les transfers MUNI sont valides sur le BART?
! Oui ! Non ! Ne sais pas
Est-ce que les tickets de BART sont valides sur le MUNI?
! Oui ! Non ! Ne sais pas
Est-ce que le passe BART Plus est valide sur le MUNI?
! Oui ! Non ! Ne sais pas
Est-ce que vous pouvez obtenir un transfer pour le MUNI dans le BART?
! Oui ! Non ! Ne sais pas
10 Quel genre de ticket(s) utilisez-vous en ce moment? Pourquoi? 11 Seriez-vous interess(e) par plus dinformation sur tous les diffrents types de tickets et leurs compatibilits avec les diffrents moyens de transport dans SF?
! Oui ! Non ! Peu importe
12 Si oui, prfreriez-vous:
! Une brochure explicative en grand dtails (pleins de renseignements, mais prend de la place)
ou ! Un grand dpliant en papier (niveau moyen de renseignements)
ou ! Une carte dinformation, format carte de crdit avec tous les renseignements minimum
ncessaires (facilement range dans le portefeuille)
A Ticket to the City 44 Commentaires supplmentaires?
A Ticket to the City 45
Appendix B: Initial Sketches for Flyer Design
A Ticket to the City 48
Appendix C: Final Design of the Flyer