Top Banner
A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project Project Personnel: Abudulai Adams-Forgor 1 , Mary Hayden 2 , Abraham Hodgson 1 , Thomas Hopson 2 , Benjamin Lamptey 3 , Jeff Lazo 2 , Raj Pandya 2 , Jennie Rice 4 , Fred Semazzi 5 , Madeleine Thomson 6 , Sylwia Trazka 6 , Tom Warner 2 , Tom Yoksas 2 Collaborating Institutions: 1: Navrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana; 2. UCAR/NCAR/UOP, USA; 3. Accra, Ghana; 4. Independent Consultant, Boulder; 5. North Carolina State University, USA; 6. International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Columbia University, USA Delivered by: Raj Pandya, 8 December 2008
35

A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Jan 05, 2016

Download

Documents

danyl

A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Project Personnel: Abudulai Adams-Forgor1, Mary Hayden2, Abraham Hodgson1, Thomas Hopson2, Benjamin Lamptey3, Jeff Lazo2, Raj Pandya2, Jennie Rice4, Fred Semazzi5, Madeleine Thomson6, Sylwia Trazka6, Tom Warner2, Tom Yoksas2

Collaborating Institutions: 1: Navrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana;2. UCAR/NCAR/UOP, USA; 3. Accra, Ghana; 4. Independent Consultant, Boulder; 5. North Carolina State University, USA; 6. International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Columbia University, USA

Delivered by: Raj Pandya, 8 December 2008

Page 2: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Participants, Clockwise from top left:

Abudulai Adams-Forgor, Madeline Thomson, Benjamin Lamptey, Fred Semazzi, Raj Pandya, Jeff Lazo, Mary Hayden, Thomas Hopson, Abraham Hodgson(tentative), Jennie Rice, Tom Yoksas, Sylwia Trzaska, Tom Warner

Page 3: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Outline

Project Goal to use meteorological forecasts to help those who are managing

Meningitis in the face of limited vaccine availability Context

An overview of Meningitis Reactive and proactive vaccination strategies

Problem How to identify areas at risk for an epidemic Short term: How to allocate scarce vaccines

Method Comprehensive analysis of meningitis risk factors First step: Using meteorological data to target reactive

vaccination

Page 4: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Context: Meningococcal Meningitis

Endemic in Africa Sporadic epidemics (e.g.,

1996-1997: 250,000 cases) 5-10% fatality rate 10-20% of survivors have

permanent impacts, e.g., hearing loss, brain damage, leaning disabilities

Not a current epidemic threat in US, Europe

Page 5: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Managing Meningococcal Meningitis Worldwide

Neisseria meningitidis (Nm), is responsible for meningococcal disease that occurs worldwide

In the meningitis belt epidemics are usually due to serogroup A meningococcus The currently-available vaccine for serogroup A is scarce and

has limited efficacy An improved vaccine is being piloted next year: mass

vaccinations throughout the meningitis belt over the next 10 years may eliminate the disease

In the developed world, the disease is uncommon. Most cases are due to serogroup C meningococcus, for which there are good vaccines

In the last decade, we have seen the emergence of serogroups X and W135, internationally Serogroup X has no vaccine; a limited efficacy vaccine for W

exists

Page 6: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

1988

Nepal1980s

India1985-1986

China1980-1987

SaudiArabia 1987

ST-5

Global expansion of serogroup A meningococcus ST-5 complex

Slide adapted from Pierre Nicolas, WHO

Page 7: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

1988Chad

19881994 1996

Niger 1995 1996 2000 2001

Cameroon

1993199419951996.

RCA1992

Nigéria

1996BurkinaFaso

199519962001

GuineaBissau

19931999

Senegal

1998199920002001

Mali

1997

Burundi

19921994

Zaïre

1994

Sudan

1987

Saudi Arabia outbreak

Ethiopia

1988

Nicolas P et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 5129-35

ST-5 was responsible for the most important epidemic ever seen in Africa in 1996 > 150,000 cases

Serogroup A ST-5 expansion in Africa:1988 - 2001

Slide adapted from Pierre Nicolas, WHO

Page 8: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Suspect meningitis cases/week, /year Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger:

1996 - week 21, 2008

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

1986

1986

1987

1988

1988

1989

1990

1990

1991

1992

1992

1993

1994

1995

1995

1996

1997

1997

1998

1999

1999

2000

2001

2001

2002

2003

2004

2004

2005

2006

2006

2007

2008

Semaines

Cas

Niger Mali Burkina Faso

Slide Adapted from Stéphane Hugonnet, WHO

Page 9: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Cas suspects de méningite Burkina Faso: 1996-2008

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Années-semaines

No

mb

re d

e ca

s

Slide Adapted from Stéphane Hugonnet, WHO

Page 10: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Meningo Case US$ 2.325 M

US$ 0.17 /inhabUS$ 90 / case

Health SystemUS$ 7.103 M

US$ 0.52 / inhab2% of National Health Expenditure

Other SR4,8%, US$ 0.02/inhab; US$13.3 /case

Case management9.6%; US$0.05/inhab; US$26.4 / case

Cost of 2007 Epidemic in Burkina Faso

Indirect costs54.7%; US$49.2/caseReactive Immunization campaign

85%; US$ 0.44/inhab; US$1.45/vaccinated

Direct Medical Cost28.2%; US$25.3/case

Direct Non Medical Cost17.2%; US$15.5/case

Slide from A. Colombini, F. Bationo; Agence de Médecine Préventive

Page 11: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Reactive Vaccination

The currently available vaccine for Serogroup A (Polysaccharide) Scarce Only provides immunity to the person vaccinated, but still allows

them to transmit the disease to others (carriage) Only lasts 1-2 years Doesn’t produce an immune response in kids under two

The currently available vaccine is used reactively to manage the epidemics, once they start.

Page 12: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

16 Countries implementing enhanced meningitis surveillance, 2008

Slide Adapted from Stéphane Hugonnet, WHO

Page 13: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

The principle of thresholds

Alert threshold5/100 000/week

0

400

800

1200

1600

w1 w2w3 w4 w5

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

swk1 wk8 wk15 wk20

AR /100 000/wk

5

10

0

400

800

1200

1600

w1 w2w3 w4 w5

Nu

mb

er

of

Ca

se

swk1 wk8 wk15 wk20

AR /100 000/wk

5

10

Epidemic threshold10/100 000/week

Immediately conduct district mass vaccinationStrengthen case management

Clinical samples + lab confirmation

Slide Adapted from Stéphane Hugonnet, WHO

Note that in the developed world epidemic threshold is 1 per 100k per year!!

Page 14: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Alert and epidemic districts in African meningitis belt: Weeks 1-26, 2008

Slide Adapted from Stéphane Hugonnet, WHO

Page 15: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

From the reaction to the prevention..

Ziniare 2006

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

semaines

taux

d'a

ttaqu

e

Seuil épidémique

Vaccination

Ziniare 2006

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

semaines

taux

d'a

ttaqu

e

Seuil épidémique

Vaccination

Reactive Vaccination: A frustrating strategy

Bogande 2007

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

semaines

taux

d'a

ttaqu

e

Seuil épidémique

Vaccination

Bogande 2007

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

semaines

taux

d'a

ttaqu

e

Seuil épidémique

Vaccination

Slide Adapted from Stéphane Hugonnet, WHO

Page 16: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

The new vaccine - Conjugate A

Promising features May provide immunity for up to 10 years Once vaccinated, a person can’t transmit the disease (no carriage) Immunogenic in children under two All this implies that the new vaccine (conjugate) can be used

proactively Caveats..

The vaccine hasn’t yet been evaluated in real-world settigns Manufacturing constraints mean that it may require ten years to

vaccinate everyone in the meningitis belt Implies the need to continue reactive strategies in response to epidemics

Doesn’t protect against X or W serogroup W was a problem among Hajj pilgrims, and responsible for 12,617 cases

and 1,447 deaths in Burkina in 2002 (but has been much less visible lately) All this suggests the reactive use of the currently-available vaccine

(the polysaccharide) will continue

Page 17: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Managing and Forecasting Meningitis Epidemics

Meningococcal meningitis epidemics require three factors… A population susceptible to the emerging serogroup An hyper-invasive/hyper-virulent strain Risk factors – including environmental factors, social

factors, …

Page 18: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Why do we think Weather is a Risk Factor for Meningitis?

Meningitis in Africa is largely, though not entirely, confined to regions with a defined dry season Meningitis epidemics always occur in the dry season

Meningitis is culturally associated with dust, which is seasonal (in fact, in many languages the name for meningitis is “sand disease”)

Meningitis epidemics end abruptly with the start of the rainy season

Page 19: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Two questions:

Can what is known about climate and weather risk factors be used to better help manage scarce vaccines in the current reactive strategy

What kind of research can improve future management, including the proactive application of the new Conjugate A vaccine.

Page 20: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Affected districts(n = 1232 / 3281) Reported to district Reported to province

Molesworth et al. 20020.0 - (lower)0.4 - (medium)0.6 - (high)0.8 - (very high)

Risk mapping based on env. factors• Land cover type• Seasonal absolute humidity profile

NB. Significant but not included in final model Seasonal dust profile, Population density, Soil type

Molesworth et al. 2003

Comparison of observed epidemic areas and areas predicted from environmental

variables

Slide from Sylwia Trzaska, IRI

Page 21: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Seasonality of meningococcal disease

Thomson et al., 2006Slide from Sylwia Trzaska, IRI

Page 22: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Seasonal onset of cases may be triggered by climate

Sultan et al. 2006Slide from Sylwia Trzaska, IRI

Page 23: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project
Page 24: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Our Google Project Components

0. Overall focus on Ghana, especially NavrongoActivity 1. Systematic investigation of the factors (not just

environmental) that will impact the epidemics The role of dust? Cultural Practices, Population, etc..

Activity 2. Better forecasts of the end of the dry season Preliminary conversations suggest more precise

information would help; decision makers are already informally trying to account for this

Focus on implementation of current understanding in a decision process while doing research

Activity 3. Preliminary economic assessment of the impact of vaccine intervention – including impact of new weather information Includes a survey of households to identify other factors

that may be managed as well

Page 25: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Ghana Focus

Navrongo, in northern Ghana, has excellent epidemiological surveillance data going back 10 years

Their staff includes necessary expertise, including Abudulai Adams-Forgor and Abraham Hodgson (the director) who are publishing a paper on weather-meningitis links in Ghana

Former UCAR post-doc, Benjamin Lamptey provides ties to the operational community in Ghana; which will help with data access and sustainability (ultimately, weather service will provide forecasts)

Page 26: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Influence Diagrams: A tool for organizing and activating the projects activities

Compact, graphical way to communicate complex relationships between: Decisions Uncertainties, data, research results Outcomes and objectives

Corresponds to a mathematical model (Bayesian network) Incorporates probability distributions Optimizes the decision Determines the value of new information, research

Page 27: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

= Decision = Uncertainty/Data = Decision Value

Example: Orange Grower Decision

FrostProtect or

Not?

ActualWeather

FrostProtection

Cost

CropImpacts

Crop Value -Costs

Uncertainty that resolves after the decision is made. This probability distribution is known as the “prior.”

= Influence

Page 28: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

= Decision = Uncertainty/Data = Decision Value

Orange Grower Decision with a Forecast

FrostProtect or

Not?

ActualWeather

FrostProtection

Cost

CropImpacts

Crop Value -Costs

FrostForecastInformation

available at the time of the decision

Uncertainty that resolves after the decision is made. The prior distribution is updated based on the forecast using Bayes’ Rule.

= Influence

Comparing the change in theexpected value of the best decisionwith and without the forecast is the value of the forecast.

Page 29: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

ActiveSerogroup

VaccineEffectiveness

Size ofOutbreak

Health CareCosts

Vaccine Used, Costs

# of EarlyCases in Districtand Neighboring

Districts

Do we launch a mass vaccina-tion campaignin a district?

MinimizeCosts, Deaths

% Vaccinated

Onset ofWet Season

Deaths

Carriage

HumidityForecast

Dust, DryWeather

Conditions

VaccineAvailability

Susceptibilityto Active

SerogroupSocioeconomic

Factors*

SurveillanceQuality

Migration

MassGatherings

*Includes: cultural practices (e.g., use of traditional medicine, head scarves, cooking practices, etc.), demographics (e.g., age, gender), income, presence of other diseases, awareness, and so on.

Influence Diagram for Meningitis Management

HerdImmunity

Page 30: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Activity 1: Identify socioeconomic factors that influence epidemic and provide

baseline data for economic evaluation

Survey designed to be administered in conjunction with twice-per-year carriage visits in Navrongo District

Survey will characterize: Economic impact of disease on households Attitudes and beliefs about the disease Socio-economic conditions that may impact risk of disease Cultural knowledge and practices that may influence disease

risk (e.g., practice of breathing through a scarf, food practices, use of traditional medicine)

Could allow an opportunity to expand the decision support system

Page 31: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Activity 2a: Identify weather variables linked to end of epidemic

Collect Epidemiological Data Archive Navrongo district epidemiological records Locate and archive less valuable but still good data from

neighboring districts

Collect Weather Data Locate and archive in-situ weather data for Navrongo and

surroundings Prepare additional meteorological data from other sources-

NCEP reanalysis, COSMIC soundings, etc.

Compare the two data sets, and identify variables strongly correlated with the end of the epidemic (e.g., sustained absolute humidity)

Page 32: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Activity 2b: Predict the end of the dry season

Use TIGGE (WMO THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble) ensemble model output and other tools to predict weather in Northern Ghana 2-14 days in advance

Optimize this prediction for the variables associated with meningitis.

Since this signal is primarily the interplay of synoptic andglobal scale circulations, we believe we can forecastthis

Page 33: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

OUTPUT: A Decision Support System

Meet with local, regional and international decision makers to design data delivery systems that support their needs: Vaccination deployment decisions are made by WHO,

Médecines sans Frontières, UNICEF and Red Cross/Red Crescent

They do try to prioritize areas where rains are farther away in time for vaccination campaigns

Seasonal forecasts are not yet actionable

If we can build a decision support system, we can use the influence diagram to do a very preliminary evaluation the impact of the decision (Activity 3)

Page 34: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project

Some final thoughts…lessons I think I’ve learned so far (and the rest of team

already knew…) Listen - to decision-makers and in-the-field workers to

ensure the decision process is based on real data, meets decision-makers needs, and results in action.

E.g.: we’ve learned that seasonal forecasts are (currently) more difficult to use than short-term forecasts, because decision makers we are working with can’t influence the amount of vaccine available.

Be Humble - Meteorology isn’t the only factor that influences the disease spread, so it needs to be considered in that context; multiple expertise is needed to even figure out how meteorology can contribute

Involve the Community - Work in Africa (or any community) needs to occur at the invitation of the community, with the community, and address the needs of the community. “No drive-by science”

Page 35: A Summary of the UCAR Google.o Weather and Meningitis Project