A STUDY ON WELFARE MEASURES ON EMPLOYEE IN CLASSIC KNITS INDIA PVT LTD PALANI PROJECT REPORT Submitted by S.GAYATHIRI DEVI REGISTER NO: 83209601012 Under The Guidance Of Ms. K. JAYASURIYAA, B.Sc., M.B.A., Faculty, Department Of Management Studies In partial fulfillment for the award of the degree Of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES NPR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY NATHAM
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A STUDY ON WELFARE MEASURES ON EMPLOYEE IN
CLASSIC KNITS INDIA PVT LTD
PALANI
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
S.GAYATHIRI DEVI
REGISTER NO: 83209601012
Under The Guidance Of
Ms. K. JAYASURIYAA, B.Sc., M.B.A.,
Faculty, Department Of Management Studies
In partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
Of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
NPR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
NATHAM
June 2011
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
NPR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
NATHAM
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
This to certify that the project work entitled “A STUDY ON WELFARE MEASURES
ON EMPLOYEE IN CLASSIC KNITS INDIA PVT LTD.,PALANI” is a bonafide work
done by S.GAYATHIRI DEVI [REGISTER NO:83209601012] in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the award of Master of Business Administration by Anna University during the
academic year 2009 – 2011.
GUIDE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT
Submitted for Viva-Voce Examination held on
INTERNAL EXAMINER EXTERNAL EXAMINER
:ABSTRACT
The welfare measure is “An effort to make life worth living for workmen”. It
motivates employee to a great extent which leads to organizational growth. It is a major
factor which affects the employee morale.
The study on effect of welfare measure on employee in CLASSIC KNITS INDIA (P)
LTD was done to evaluate the level of satisfaction of employees about welfare measure
The main objective of the study is to measure the effect of welfare measure, level of
satisfaction of employees regarding working condition and general attitude of employee
towards the organization.
Certain welfare measures provided by the company like medical facility, credit
facility, canteen facility, infrastructure facility, and certain factors like motivation. Job
satisfaction interrelationships are considered in this study. This was a descriptive research
study. Nearly 105 samples were collected using simple random sampling method. A
questionnaire of 25 questions was prepared and data were collected from the employees of
CLASSIC KNITS INDIA (P) LTD appropriate statistical tools were used to analyze the data.
From the study it is inferred that most of the employees were satisfied with the
welfare measures provided by the company.
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost we thank god for his blessings showered on us for completing the
project successfully.
I extend my sincere thanks to Dr. V. Srinivasaraman M.E., PhD. Principal for
giving me an opportunity to conduct this study.
I have great pleasure in expressing my deep sense of gratitude to Mr. A. Kumar
M.B.A., M.Phil. head of the department of management studies for his valuable support.
My profound gratitude is also to, Ms. K. Jayasuriyaa B.Sc., M.B.A., faculty guide,
for her valuable guidance and constant encouragement in the successful completion of this
project.
I express my deepest and sincere thanks to, Classic knits India Private Limited,
Palani, which gave permission and enabled me to take up this project in this esteemed
organization.
I am deeply obliged to Mr.M.Selvaraj M.Sc., M.B.A (HR) for their exemplary
guidance and support without their help this project would not have been success
Last but not the least, I express my deepest gratitude to my beloved Parents for their
constant encouragement. I also extend my heartfelt thanks to my friends who supported me
in the course.
S.GAYATHIRIDEVI
ii
TABLE OF CONTENT
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii
LIST OF TABLES iii
LIST OF CHARTS v
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO
I
Introduction
1.1 Industry profile
1.2 Company profile
1.3 Need Of The Study
1.4 Scope for the study
1.5 Objective
1.6 Review of literature
1.7 Research Methodology
1.8 Limitations
1
4
6
10
11
12
13
17
21
II
Data Analysis And Interpretation
2.1 Percentage Analysis
2.2 Statistical Analysis
2.2.1. Correlation
2.2.2. Chi-Square test
2.2.3. Mann Whitney U -Test
22
19
50
52
53
III
Summary of Findings
3.1 Findings
3.2 Suggestion
3.3 Conclusion
54
56
57
Appendix 58
References 60
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO.
2.1.1 Table Showing the Age Group of respondents 23
2.1.2 Table Showing the Gender of respondents 24
2.1.3 Table Showing the Educational Qualification of respondents 25
2.1.4 Table Showing the Marital Status of respondents 26
2.1.5 Table Showing the Monthly Income of respondents 27
2.1.6 Table Showing the Stages of Worker of respondents 27
2.1.7 Table Showing the Experience of respondents 29
2.1.8 Table Showing the Bonus Amount of respondents 30
2.1.9 Table Showing the Safety Measures of respondents 31
2.1.10 Table Showing the Medical Facility of respondents 32
2.1.11 Table Showing the GPA Benefits of respondents 33
2.1.12 Table Showing the Canteen Facility of respondents 34
2.1.13 Table Showing the Credit Facility of respondents 36
2.1.14 Table Showing the Level of Satisfaction of Allowances of
respondents
37
2.1.15 Table Showing the Level of Satisfaction of Infra-Structural
Facility of respondents
39
2.1.16 Table Showing the Level of Satisfaction of Inter-
Relationship of respondents
41
2.1.17 Table Showing the Level of Motivation Given To Employee 42
iii
2.1.18 Table Showing the Level of Satisfaction of Information about Management of respondents
43
2.1.19 Table Showing the Status of Grievance Handling of respondents
44
2.1.20 Table Showing the Level of Freedom Given to the Employees
44
2.1.21 Table Showing the Work Satisfaction level of the Employee
46
2.1.22 Table Showing the Satisfaction of Employee About Welfare Measures
47
2.1.23 Table Showing the Satisfaction level of Employee Training 48
2.1.24 Table Showing the Satisfaction level of Employee safety
and Welfare Measures
49
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO.
2.1.1 Figure showing the Age Group of respondents 23
2.1.2 Figure showing the Gender of respondents 24
2.1.3 Figure showing the Educational Qualification of respondents 25
2.1.4 Figure showing the Marital Status of respondents 26
2.1.5 Figure showing the Monthly Income of respondents 27
2.1.6 Figure showing the Stages of Worker of respondents 28
2.1.7 Figure showing the Experience of respondents 29
2.1.8 Figure showing the Bonus Amount of respondents 30
2.1.9 Figure showing the Safety Measures of respondents 31
2.1.10 Figure showing the Medical Facility of respondents 32
2.1.11 Figure showing the GPA Benefits of respondents 33
2.1.12 Figure showing the Canteen Facility of respondents 34
2.1.13 Figure showing the Credit Facility of respondents 36
2.1.14 Figure showing the Level of Satisfaction of Allowances of
respondents
37
2.1.15 Figure showing the Level of Satisfaction of Infra-Structural
Facility of respondents
39
2.1.16 Figure showing the Level of Satisfaction of Inter-
Relationship of respondents
41
2.1.17 Figure showing the Level of Motivation Given To Employee 42
v
2.1.18 Figure showing the Level of Satisfaction of Information about Management of respondents
43
2.1.19 Figure showing the Status of Grievance Handling of respondents
44
2.1.20 Figure showing the Level of Freedom Given to the Employees
45
2.1.21 Figure showing the Work Satisfaction level of the Employee
46
2.1.22 Figure showing the Satisfaction of Employee About Welfare Measures of respondents
47
2.1.23 Figure showing the Satisfaction level of Employee Training 48
2.1.24 Figure showing the Satisfaction level of Employee safety
and Welfare Measures
49
vi
CHAPTER-i
INTRODUCTION:
The study was conducted in CLASSIC KNITS INDIA PVT LTD to find the effect of welfare measures on employee.
The study intends to see the satisfaction level of the employee on the facilities provided
by the company and how these welfare measures boost the employee.
The study on effect of welfare measure on employee gives the management an
indication of the level of satisfaction among the employees regarding the general working
condition and the other facilities provided by the organization.
DEFINITIONS:
The ILO (International Labour Organization) defined, “welfare as a term which is
understood to include such services and amenities as may be established in or the vicinity of
undertaking to perform their work in healthy, congenial surrounding and to provide them
with amenities conductive to good health and high morale”.
According to Arthur james Todd, “welfare as anything done for the comfort or
improvement and social of the employees over and above the wages paid, which is not a
necessity of the industry”.
MEANING OF EMPLOYEE WELFARE
Employee welfare means, such services, facilities and amenities such as canteens, rest
and recreation facilities, arrangement for travel to and for the accommodation of workers
employed at a distance from their home, and such other services, amenities and facilities
including social security measures as contribute to improve the condition under which
workers are employed.
1
CONCEPT OF EMPLOYEE WELFARE
Employee welfare may be viewed as a total concept, as a social concept and a
relative concept. The total concept is a desirable state of existence involving the physical,
mental, moral and emotional well-being. The social concept of welfare implies, of man, his
family and his community.
The relative concept of welfare implies that welfare is relative in time and place.
Employee welfare implies the setting up of minimum desirable standards and the provision of
facilities like health, food, clothing housing, medical allowance, education, insurance, job
security, such as to safeguard his health and protect him against occupational hazards. The
worker should also be equipped with necessary training and a certain level of general
From the table it infers that 4.8% of respondent are dissatisfied and 41% of
respondent are satisfied with the Medical Facility.
Figure 2.1.10
HS
S
N
HD
D
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
MEDICAL FACILITY
34
Purpose:
To know GPA Benefits of the workers
Table 2.1.11
GPA BENEFITS
S.NO GPA BENEFITS NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 23 21.9
2 Satisfied 40 38.1
3 Neutral 16 15.2
4 Highly Dissatisfied 15 14.3
5 Dissatisfied 11 10.5
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 10.5% of respondent are dissatisfied and 38.1% of
respondent are satisfied with the GPA Benefits.
Figure 2.1.11
HS S N HD D0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
GPA BENEFITS
35
Purpose:
To know Canteen Facility of the workers
Table 2.1.12
CANTEEN FACILITY
OPINION Highly Satisfied
Satisfied NeutralHighly
DissatisfiedDissatisfied Total
(i)CLEANLINESSNO OF
RESPONDENTS32 46 2 19 6 105
PERCENTAGE 30.5 43.8 18.1 1.9 5.7 100
(ii)HYGIENICNO OF
RESPONDENTS21 52 7 19 6 105
PERCENTAGE 20 49.5 6.7 18.1 5.7 100
(iii)SERVINGNO OF
RESPONDENTS27 45 14 12 7 105
PERCENTAGE 25.7 42.9 13.3 14.4 6.2 100
(iii)PRICENO OF
RESPONDENTS26 46 16 14 3 105
PERCENTAGE 24.8 43.8 15.2 13.3 2.9 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 46% of respondent are
satisfied with the cleanliness of canteen facility.
From the table it infers that 5.7% of respondent are dissatisfied and 49.5% of respondent are
satisfied with the Hygienic of canteen facility.
From the table it infers that 5.7% of respondent are dissatisfied and 42.9% of respondent are
satisfied with the Serving of canteen facility.
From the table it infers that 2.9% of respondent are dissatisfied and 43.8% of respondent are
satisfied with the Price of canteen facility
36
Figure 2.1.12
Figure 2.1.12(i)
Cleanliness Hygienic Serving Price40
42
44
46
48
50
52
satisfaction of canteen facility
Note:
. From the Figure shows that 46% of respondent are satisfied with the cleanliness and price of
canteen facility.
37
Purpose:
To know Credit Facility of the workers
Table 2.1.13
CREDIT FACILITY
HS S N HD D0
10
20
30
40
50
60
CANTEEN FACILITY
Cleanliness
Hygienic
Serving
Price
S.NO CREDIT FACILITY NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 24 22.9
2 Satisfied 23 21.9
3 Neutral 17 16.2
4 Highly Dissatisfied 6 5.7
5 Dissatisfied 35 33.3
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 5.7% of respondent are dissatisfied and 22.9% of
respondent are satisfied with the Credit Facility.
Figure 2.1.13
HS S N HD D0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
CREDIT FACILITY
38
Purpose:
To know level of satisfaction of allowances of the workers
Table 2.1.14
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF ALLOWANCES
OPINION Highly Satisfied
Satisfied NeutralHighly
DissatisfiedDissatisfied Total
(i)TRANSPORTNO OF
RESPONDENTS33 38 9 13 12 105
PERCENTAGE 31.4 36.2 8.5 12.3 11.4 100
(ii)ATTENDANCENO OF
RESPONDENTS26 38 14 8 19 105
PERCENTAGE 24.8 36.2 13.3 7.6 18.1 100
(iii)PUNCTUALITYNO OF
RESPONDENTS19 32 28 9 17 105
PERCENTAGE 18.1 30.5 26.6 8.6 16.2 100
(iv)EDUCATIONNO OF
RESPONDENTS40 28 13 10 14 105
PERCENTAGE 38.1 26.7 12.4 9.5 13.3 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 12% of respondent are dissatisfied and 36.2% of respondent are
satisfied with the Transport of Allowances.
From the table it infers that 7.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 36.2% of respondent are
satisfied with the Attendance of Allowances.
From the table it infers that 8.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 30.5% of respondent are
satisfied with the Punctuality of Allowances.
From the table it infers that 9.5% of respondent are dissatisfied and 38.1% of respondent are
satisfied with the Education of Allowances.
39
Figure 2.1.14
Figure 3.1.14(i)
Transport Attendance punctuality Education05
10152025303540
satisfaction of Allowances
Note:
From the Figure shows that 38.1% of respondent are satisfied with the Education of
Allowances.
40
Purpose:
To know level of satisfaction of infra-structural facility of the workers
Table 2.1.15
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF INFRA-STRUCTURAL FACILITY
OPINION Highly Satisfied
Satisfied NeutralHighly
DissatisfiedDissatisfied Total
HS S N HD D05
1015202530354045
ALLOWANCES
Transport
Attendance
Punctuality
Education
(i)RESTROOMNO OF RESPONDENTS
29 39 5 13 19 105
PERCENTAGE 27.6 37.1 4.8 12.4 18.1 100
(ii)DRINKINGWATERNO OF RESPONDENTS
28 45 5 14 13 105
PERCENTAGE 26.7 42.9 4.8 13.2 12.4 100
(iii)VENTILATIONNO OF RESPONDENTS
18 47 20 9 11 105
PERCENTAGE 17.1 44.8 19 8.6 10.5 100
(iv)LIGHTINGNO OF RESPONDENTS
28 38 17 12 10 105
PERCENTAGE 26.7 36.2 16.2 11.4 9.5 100
(v)TOILETSNO OF RESPONDENTS
22 43 17 13 10 105
PERCENTAGE 20.9 40.9 16.2 12.4 9.6 100
(vi)WORKINGENVIRONMENT
NO OF RESPONDENTS24 42 13 9 17 105
PERCENTAGE 22.8 40 12.4 8.6 16.2 100
(vii)TRANSPORTATINNO OF RESPONDENTS
36 42 6 11 10 105
PERCENTAGE 34.3 40 5.7 10.5 9.5 100
Inference:
1. From the table it infers that 12.4% of respondent are dissatisfied and 37.1% of respondent are satisfied with the Restroom of Infra-Structural Facility.
2. From the table it infers that 12.4% of respondent are dissatisfied and 42.9% of respondent are satisfied with the Drinking Water of Infra-Structural Facility.
3. From the table it infers that 8.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 44.8% of respondent are satisfied with the Ventilation of Infra-Structural Facility.
41
4. From the table it infers that 9.5% of respondent are dissatisfied and 36.2% of respondent are satisfied with the Lighting of Infra-Structural Facility.
5. From the table it infers that 9.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 40.9% of respondent are satisfied with the Toilets of Infra-Structural Facility.
6. From the table it infers that 8.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 40% of respondent are satisfied with the Working Environment of Infra-Structural Facility.
7. From the table it infers that 9.5% of respondent are dissatisfied and 40% of respondent are satisfied with the Transportation of Infra-Structural Facility.
Figure 2.1.15
Figure 3.1.15(i)
R D V L T W T0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
satisfaction level of Infra-structural Facility
Note:
From the Figure shows that 44.8% of respondent are satisfied with the Ventilation of Infra-
Structural Facility.
42
Purpose:
To know level of satisfaction of inter-relationship of the workers
Table 2.1.16
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF INTER-RELATIONSHIP
HS S N HD D05
101520253035404550
INFRA-STRUCTURAL
Restroom
Drinking water
Ventilation
Lighting
Toilets
Working Environment
Transportation
OPINION Highly Satisfied
Satisfied NeutralHighly
DissatisfiedDissatisfied Total
(i)CO-WORKERSNO OF RESPONDENTS
36 32 19 7 11 105
PERCENTAGE 34.5 30.5 18 6.7 10.5 100
(ii)SUPERVISORANDWORKERS
NO OF RESPONDENTS24 40 15 9 17 105
PERCENTAGE 22.8 38.1 14.3 8.6 16.2 100
Inference:
1. From the table it infers that 6.7% of respondent are dissatisfied and 34.5% of respondent
are satisfied with the Relationship between Co-Workers of Inter-Relationship.
2.From the table it infers that 8.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 38.1% of respondent
are satisfied with the Relationship between supervisor and Workers of Inter-Relationship.
Figure 3.1.16
HS S N HD D0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
INTER-RELATIONSHIP
43
Purpose:
To know level of motivation given to employee.
Table 2.1.17
LEVEL OF MOTIVATION GIVEN TO EMPLOYEE
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 34 32.4
2 Satisfied 36 34.3
3 Neutral 9 8.6
4 Highly Dissatisfied 14 13.3
5 Dissatisfied 12 11.4
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 11.4% of respondent are dissatisfied and 34.3% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 3.1.17
HS S N HD D05
101520253035
LEVEL OF MOTIVATION GIVEN TO EMPLOYEE
44
Purpose:
To know level of satisfaction of information about management of the workers
Table 2.1.18
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF INFORMATION ABOUT MANAGEMENT
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 19 18.1
2 Satisfied 47 44.8
3 Neutral 23 21.8
4 Highly Dissatisfied 9 8.6
5 Dissatisfied 7 6.7
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 6.7% of respondent are dissatisfied and 44.8% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 3.1.18
HS S N HD D05
1015202530354045
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION OF INFORMATION ABOUT MANAGEMENT
45
Purpose:
To know status of grievance handling of the workers
Table 2.1.19
STATUS OF GRIEVANCE HANDLING
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 17 16.2
2 Satisfied 41 39.1
3 Neutral 18 17.1
4 Highly Dissatisfied 13 12.4
5 Dissatisfied 16 15.2
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 12.4% of respondent are dissatisfied and 39.1% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 2.1.19
HS S N HD D05
10152025303540
STATUS OF GRIEVANCE HANDLING
46
Purpose:
To know level of freedom given to the employees.
Table 2.1.20
LEVEL OF FREEDOM GIVEN TO THE EMPLOYEES
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 20 19.1
2 Satisfied 39 37.1
3 Neutral 15 14.3
4 Highly Dissatisfied 19 18.1
5 Dissatisfied 12 11.4
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 12.4% of respondent are dissatisfied and 39.1% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 3.1.20
HS S N HD D05
10152025303540
LEVEL OF FREEDOM GIVEN TO THE EMPLOYEES
47
Purpose:
To know work satisfaction level of the employee of the workers
Table 2.1.21
WORK SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE EMPLOYEE
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 24 22.9
2 Satisfied 52 49.5
3 Neutral 12 11.4
4 Highly Dissatisfied 7 6.7
5 Dissatisfied 10 9.5
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 6.7% of respondent are dissatisfied and 49.5% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 3.1.21
HS S N HD D05
101520253035404550
WORK SATISFACTION LEVELOF THE EMPLOYEE
48
Purpose:
To know satisfaction of employees about welfare measures of the workers
Table 2.1.22
SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT WELFARE MEASURES
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 28 26.7
2 Satisfied 33 31.4
3 Neutral 20 19
4 Highly Dissatisfied 11 10.5
5 Dissatisfied 13 12.4
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 10.5% of respondent are dissatisfied and 31.4% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 2.1.22
HS S N HD D05
101520253035
SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES ABOUT WELFARE MEASURES
49
Purpose:
To know satisfaction level of employees training of the workers
Table 2.1.23
SATISFACTION LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES TRAINING
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 16 15.2
2 Satisfied 43 41
3 Neutral 26 24.7
4 Highly Dissatisfied 9 8.6
5 Dissatisfied 11 10.5
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 8.6% of respondent are dissatisfied and 41% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 2.1.23
HS S N HD D05
1015202530354045
SATISFACTION LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES TRAINING
50
Purpose:
To know satisfaction level of employees safety and welfare measures of the workers
Table 2.1.24
SATISFACTION LEVEL OF EMPLOYEES SAFETY AND WELFARE MEASURES
S.NO OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Highly Satisfied 22 20.9
2 Satisfied 49 46.7
3 Neutral 21 20
4 Highly Dissatisfied 4 3.8
5 Dissatisfied 9 8.6
Total 105 100
Inference:
From the table it infers that 3.8% of respondent are dissatisfied and 46.7% of
respondent are satisfied.
Figure 2.1.24
51
2.2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
2.2.1. CORRELATION
FORMULA:
Where,
r = coefficient of correlation
x = variable, level of emotional intelligence
y = variable, (performance, efficiency and conflict)
n = number of samples
CORRELATION BETWEEN WORK SATISFACTON LEVEL OF EMPLOYEE AND
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISOR AND WORKER:
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: There is no significant difference between work satisfaction level of employee
and relationship between supervisor and worker
H1: There is significant difference between work satisfaction level of employee and
relationship between supervisor and worker
.
52
Table showing the correlation work satisfaction level of employee and
relationship between supervisor and worker:
Correlations
Interrelationship-Supervisor
and Workers
Are you satisfied with the
work you do
Interrelationship-Supervisor and
Workers
Pearson Correlation 1 .213*
Sig. (2-tailed) .029
N 105 105
Are you satisfied with the work
you do
Pearson Correlation .213* 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .029
N 105 105
Interpretation:
The Spearman correlation value for the correlation between work
satisfaction level of employee and relationship between supervisor and
worker is .029. Therefore H0 is accepted. Thus there is a positive
correlation between level of satisfaction on the training program and the
job efficiency. As satisfaction level of relationship between supervisor and
worker increases, job efficiency also increases
53
2.2.2 CHI-SQUARE:
Chi- Square test between safety measure and work satisfaction level of the employee.
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: There is no significant difference between safety measure and work satisfaction level of
the employee.
H1: There is significant difference between safety measure and work satisfaction level of the
employee.
Table showing Chi- Square test between safety measure and work satisfaction level of
the employee.
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 58.535a 16 .000
Likelihood Ratio 47.715 16 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.540 1 .011
N of Valid Cases 105
Interpretation:
P value is 58.535. P value is greater than 0.05. Therefore H0 is accepted. Thus there is
no significant difference between safety measure and work satisfaction level of the employee.
54
2.2.3. Mann-Whitney TestMann-Whitney Test for satisfaction level of the employee welfare & safety measures And Gender
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: There is no significant relationship between satisfaction level about the welfare & safety measures and gender.
H1: There is significant relationship between satisfaction level about the welfare & safety measures and gender.
Table showing Mann-Whitney U test for satisfaction level about the welfare & safety
measures and gender.
Ranks
Sort of worker N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
In general are you satisfied
with the welfare and safety
measures given by
Management
Temporary 58 51.70 2998.50
Permanent 47 54.61 2566.50
Total 105
Test Statisticsa
In general are
you satisfied with
the welfare and
safety measures
given by
Management
Mann-Whitney U 1287.500
Wilcoxon W 2998.500
Z -.518
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .605
a. Grouping Variable: Sort of worker
Interpretation:
From the above table it is clear that since the P value is greater than 0.05. H0 is
accepted and thus there is no significant relationship between satisfaction level of the
employee welfare & safety measures And Gender.
55
CHAPTER-iii
SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
3.1. FINDINGS
Majority (70.5%) of the respondents are between 18-25 age groups.
Majority (68.6%) of the respondents are female.
Majority (25.7%) of the respondents are studied Below Hr Sec.
Majority (70.5%) of the respondents are unmarried.
Majority (71.3%) of the respondents are having salary below 5000.
Majority (63.8%) of the respondents are Permanent worker.
Majority (42.9%) of the respondents are having 1-5yrs experience.
Majority (71.4%) of the respondents are having bonus amount below 5000.
Majority (37.1%) of respondents are satisfied the safety measures.
Majority (41%) of respondents are satisfied the medical facility.
Majority (38.1%) of respondents are satisfied the GPA benefits.
Majority (46%) of respondents are satisfied the Cleanliness of Canteen facility.
Majority (49.5%) of respondents are satisfied the Hygienic of Canteen facility.
Majority (42.9%) of respondents are satisfied the Serving of Canteen facility.
Majority (43.8%) of respondents are satisfied the Price of Canteen facility.
Majority (4%) of the respondents say that, they are not satisfied restroom.
Majority (42.9%) of the respondents say that, they are satisfied Drinking water.
Majority (44.8%) of the respondents say that, they are satisfied Ventilation.
Majority (36.2%) of the respondents say that, they are satisfied Lighting.
Majority (40.9%) of the respondents say that, they are satisfied Toilet.
Majority (40%) of the respondents say that, they are satisfied Working environment,
Transportation.
Majority (22.9%) of respondents are satisfied the credit facility.
56
Majority (36.2%) of respondents are satisfied the both transportation, attendance of
allowances.
Majority (30.5%) of respondents are satisfied the punctuality of allowances.
Majority (38.1%) of respondents are satisfied the education of allowances.
Majority (34.5%) of respondents are satisfied the relationship between co-worker.
Majority (38.1%) of respondents are satisfied the relationship between supervisor and
co-worker.
Majority (34.3%) of respondents are satisfied the motivation given by employee.
Majority (44.8%) of respondents are satisfied the information given the employee by
the management.
Majority (39.1%) of respondents are satisfied the grievances handling.
Majority (37.1%) of respondents are satisfied the freedom given to the employee.
Majority (49.5%) of respondents are satisfied their work.
Majority (31.4%) of respondents are satisfied the welfare officer.
Majority (41%) of respondents are satisfied the employee training.
Majority (46.7%) of respondents are satisfied the welfare and safety measures.
57
3.2. SUGGESTIONS
The researcher listed out the following suggestion after analyzing the main findings of this
research study.
Classic Knits India (p) Ltd facilitate for the up gradation of the studies to employee.
This can be more improved.
Rest room facilities can be further more improved.
Since the employees are married the company can concentrate on crèche facility.
The company can provide safety equipments to the employees.
The salary increment for employees will increase the employee satisfaction and which
in turn increase the employee morale.
Management must make necessary arrangements for periodic medical check-up, so
that occupational diseases can be diagnosed earlier and necessary treatments can be
given to the concerned workers.
58
3.3. CONCLUSION
Employers are more than willing to understand the employee’s requirement and
design their welfare packages and employee benefits programmers accordingly. The time for
them to understand the changes in employee needs and bridge the gap. Employers should
understand what employees want and compensate them accordingly.
Employees are need of promotion, increment, sport and game, Technical tour
programme, Restroom.
Thus the focus of welfare policy should be on these factors. If the organizations want to achieve the aim of attracting and retaining suitable talent from the labour market.
59
APPENDIX
A STUDY ON WELFARE MEASURES ON EMPLOYEE
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Age: (a) 18-25 (b) 26-35 (c) 36-45 (d) Above 452. Gender: (a) Male (b) Female3. Educational Qualification:(a) Below Hr Sec (b) Hr Sec (c) UG (d) PG4. Marital Status: (a) Married (b) Unmarried5. Monthly Income:(a) Below 5000 (b) 5001 to 10000 (c) 10001 to 15000 (d) 15001 to 20000 (e) 20001 and above
6. What sort of worker you are? (a) Temporary (b) Permanent7. Experience(a) 0-1 Yrs (b) 1-5 Yrs (c) 5-10 Yrs (d) Above 10 Yrs8. what is your bonus amount on last year?(a) Below 5000 (b) 5001 to 10000 (c) 10001 to 15000 (d) 15001 and above(A) Highly satisfied (B) Satisfied (C) Neutral (D) Dissatisfied Highly (E) Dissatisfied9. Safety Measures:
A B C D Ea)Are you satisfied with the safety appliances in work place?
10. Medical Facility:A B C D E
a. Specify the level of satisfaction
11. GPA Benefits:A B C D E
a. Specify the level of satisfaction about GPA Benefits
12. Canteen facility:
A B C D ECleanlinessHygienicServingPrice
60
13. Credit facility:A B C D E
Is any advances and loan given to you are satisfied
14. Specify the level of satisfaction of other allowances:A B C D E
Transport allowanceAttendance allowancePunctuality allowanceEducation allowance
Relationship between co-workersRelationship between supervisor and workers.
A B C D E17. Level of motivation given to employee:18.Are you informed about all the management activities19.Does the management solve all your grievances20.Level of freedom to express your ideas21.Are you satisfied with the work you do22.Are you satisfied with welfare officer23.What is the satisfaction level of Training24. In general are you satisfied with the welfare and safety measures given by Management?
Any Suggestion:
61
REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
TEXT AND REFERENCE BOOKS
1. C.R.Kothari - Research Methodology- New age international