A study on Analysis of Financial Statements of Bharti Airtel

1.1 Finance:-

Financial management is that managerial activity which is concerned with the

planning and control of firm’s financial resources. As a separate activity or discipline

it is of recent origin. It was a branch of economics till 1890 still today it has no

unique body of knowledge of its own and draws heavily on economics for its

theoretical concepts. The subject of financial management is of immense interest to

both academicians and practicing managers. It is of great interest to academicians,

because the subject is still developing and are still certain areas where controversies

exist for which no enormous solution have been reached as yet. The most crucial

decision of the firm are those which relate to finance and an understanding of the

theory of financial management provides than with conceptual and analytical insights

to make those decisions skillfully.

1.2 Meaning Of Finance:-

Finance is rightly been termed as ‘master key’ providing accretes to are sources required for

running business activities. Finance is the management of monetary affairs of a company.

1.3 Definition of Finance:-

Ray G Jones and Dean Dudely observe that the word finance come indirectly from Latin

word “Finis”.

In simple words “Finance is economics and Accounting”. Economics is proper utilization of

scare resources and accounting Economics is proper utilization of scarce resources and

Accounting is keeping a record or tract of things.

Kenneth Ridgeley and Ronald Bums Accent, “Financing is the process of organizing the flow

of funds so that a business can carry out its objectives in the most efficient manner of

meeting its obligation as they are due”

1 | P a g eS. R. Luthra Institute Of Management

1.4 Scope Of Finance:-

What is finance? What are firm’s financial activities? How are they related to firm’s

other activities?

There exists an inseparable relation between finance on one hand and on the other.

Almost all kinds of business activities directly or indirectly involved the acquisition

and use of funds. E.g.: recruitment and promotion of employees, buying of machines,

advertising, sales promotion activities requires outlay of cash and therefore affect

financial resources. Finance functions or decision includes investment decision,

finance decision, dividend decision, and liquidity decision.

A firm performs functions simultaneously and continuously in the normal course of

business. They do not necessarily occur in a sequence. Finance functions call for

skillful planning control and execution of firm’s attitudes.

1.5 Functions Of Finance:-

There are three major functions of finance:

a) Investment decision

b) Financing decision

c) Dividend decision.

a) Investment decision:

Investment decision relates to selection of asset in which funds will be inverted by a firm.

The assets that can be acquired by a firm may be long term asset and short term assets.

b) Financing decision:

Financing decision is concerned with financing mix or capital structure the mix of

department and equity is known as capital structure. Determination of the proportion of

equity and debt is the main issue in financing to share holders and also financial risk.


c) Dividend decision:

A firm may distribute its profits or retain the balance with it the decision depends upon the

preference of the shareholders and investment opportunities available to the firm. Dividend

decision has a strong influence on the market price of share.

Therefore, the dividend policy is too determined in terms of its impact on shareholders’

value. The optimum dividend policy is one. Which maximize the value of shares and wealth

of shareholders the financial manager should determine the optimum payout ratio that is the

proportion of net profit to be paid out to shareholders? The financial manager should also

consider those factors. This determines the dividend policy in practice.

1.6 Financial Management:-

Financial management is a part of managerial activity, which is mainly concerned with the

planning, and controlling of financial resources of a firm. Prof Solomon defines “Financial

management is concerned with efficient use of an important economic resource is capital

funds.

1.7 Importance Of Financial Management:-

Financial management is that managerial activity which is concerned with the

planning and control of firm’s financial resources. As a separate activity or discipline

it is of recent origin. It was a branch of economics till 1890 still today it has no

unique body of knowledge of its own and draws heavily on economics for its

theoretical concepts. The subject of financial management is of immense interest to

both academicians and practicing managers. It is of great interest to academicians,

because the subject is still developing and are still certain areas where controversies

exist for which no enormous solution have been reached as yet. The most crucial

decision of the firm are those which relate to finance and an understanding of the

theory of financial management provides than with conceptual and analytical insights

to make those decisions skillfully.


1.8 Objectives Of Financial Management:-

The term objective reforms to a goal or decision criterion for taking financial decisions.

There are two objectives:

a) Profit maximization

b) Wealth maximization

a) PROFIT MAXIMIZATION:

The term profit maximization is deep rooted in the economic theory. It is needed that when

pursue the policy of maximizing profits society’s resources are efficiently utilized. The firms

should undertake those actions that would pursue profits and drop those actions that would

decrease profits. The financial decisions should be oriented to the maximization of profits.

Profits provides yardstick for measuring the economic performance of firms. It makes

allocation of resources to profitable and desirable areas. It also ensures maximum social

welfare. On these grounds profit maximization serves as criteria for financial decision.

b) WEALTH MAXIMISATION:

Wealth maximization or value maximization or net present Value maximization provides an

appropriate and operationally feasible decision criterion for financial management decisions.

It provides an unambiguous measure of what financial management should seek to maximize

in making investment and financing decisions. It satisfies the three requirements of a

suitable criterion namely precise, time value of money and quality of benefits.

In wealth maximization criterion the benefits associated with assets are measured in terms of

cash flows rather than accounting profits. The cash flows are a precise concept with definite

meaning. It overcomes the deficiencies associated with accounting profits.


Research Design:-

Research design of study is a conceptual structure a sketch or plan laid out for conducting the

study. It is considered as a blue print of the final copy of the project where it shows the

activities undertaken while doing the study. It constitutes the steps taken beginning with of

collection of clarifying it. Analyzing, interpreting, processing and finally putting it is an

actual form.

2.1 Objectives of the Study:-

1. To ascertain the overall profitability of the company.

2. To analyze trends on the basis of ratios for consecutive 4 years.

3. To gain insight as to how a financial statement can be use to predict future.

4. To analyze working capital funds with the help of ratios.

2.2 Scope of Study:-

The scope of the study is limited to Bharti Airtel and is an attempt to find out the

financial position during past 4 years from the Annual report of the company with

special reference to financial analysis.

2.3Methodology :-

No series assumptions so far were made as to limit the usefulness of the study was

made at any stage. However the following assumptions were made –

A study period of four years (2008-2011)

Objectives of the study and the research design as agreed upon by the company and

the researcher are sufficient, accurate and correct portray true state affairs of Ratio

analysis of the company.

Published information from the company is accurate and true.


2.4Research Design :-

Research design means a search of facts, answers to question and solution to problems. The

data are analyzed through ratio analysis common size balance sheet, comparative balance

sheet and fund flow analysis.

It is a prospective investigation. Research is a systematic logical study of an issue or problem

through scientific method. It is a systematic and objective analysis and recording of

controlled observation that may lead to the development of generalization, principles,

resulting in prediction and possibly ultimate control of events there are various designs,

which are descriptive and helpful for analytical research.

2.5Data Source :-

This study makes extensive use of secondary data collected in the forms of annual reports.

The nature of secondary data collected was both qualitative and quantitative in nature.

Considering the above plan, research plan for the study is essentially a combination of

qualitative and quantitative aspects.

The secondary sources of data can be divided in to mainly two parts.

Internal

Accounting section

Finance section

HRD department

Miscellaneous records

External

Information for published materials like,

Annual reports of the company

Balance sheets and profit and loss accounts

Magazines


There was also primary data, which was through discussions held with the concerned

company officials from finance department. The primary data was obtained through survey

method i.e. personal interview method.

2.6 Techniques of Analysis :-

The data are analyzed through ratio analysis common size balance sheet, comparative

balance sheet and fund flow analysis.

2.7 Limitations Of The Study :-

1. The study is limited to Bharti Airtel and the finding need not apply in similar

sense to other firms.

2. The inferences that have been framed only on the basis of financial statement.

3. Based on the limited information it is not possible to arrive at a proper

conclusion.

4. Limitations of Financial analysis.


3.1 HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF THE COMPANY:-

Sunil Bharti Mittal founded the Bharti Group. In 1983, Sunil Mittal was into an agreement

with Germany's Siemens to manufacture the company's push-button telephone models for the

Indian market. In 1986, Sunil Bharti Mittal incorporated Bharti Telecom Limited (BTL) and

his company became the first in India to offer push-button telephones, establishing the basis

of Bharti Enterprises. This first-mover advantage allowed Sunil Mittal to expand his

manufacturing capacity elsewhere in the telecommunications market. By the early 1990s,

Sunil Mittal had also launched the country's first fax machines and its first cordless

telephones. In 1992, Sunil Mittal won a bid to build a cellular phone network in Delhi. In

1995, Sunil Mittal incorporated the cellular operations as Bharti Tele-Ventures and launched

service in Delhi. In 1996, cellular service was extended to Himachal Pradesh. In 1999, Bharti

Enterprises acquired control of JT Holdings, and extended cellular operations to Karnataka

and Andhra Pradesh. In 2000, Bharti acquired control of Sky cell Communications, in

Chennai. In 2001, the company acquired control of Spice Cell in Calcutta. Bharti Enterprises

went public in 2002, and the company was listed on Bombay Stock Exchange and National

Stock Exchange of India. In 2003, the cellular phone operations were rebranded under the

single Airtel brand. In 2004, Bharti acquired control of Hexagon and entered Rajasthan. In

2005, Bharti extended its network to Andaman and Nicobar.’2009; Airtel launched its first

international mobile network in Sri Lanka. In 2010, Airtel began operating in Bangladesh.

Today, Airtel is the largest cellular service provider in India and fifth largest in the world.

3.2 Type of Organizational Structure:-

The organizational structure that existed till recently concentrated on the hierarchy of the

operations (not services) inside the company as a whole. The structure depicts the

corresponding operation/region of different in-charges and hence it didn't hold anyone

responsible for each of its services. So, the company found it better to restructure its

organizational chart and it came into implementation from 1 August. The transformed

organizational structure will have two distinct Customer Business Units (CBU) with clear


focus on B2C (Business to Customer) and B2B (Business to Business) segments. Bharti

Airtel's B2C business unit will comprehensively service the retail consumers, homes and

small offices, by combining the erstwhile business units – Mobile, Telemedia, Digital TV,

and other emerging businesses (like M-commerce, M-health, M-advertising etc.). The B2C

organization will consist of Consumer Business and Market Operations.

3.3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS:-

Sunil Bharti Mittal Chairman and Managing Director

Ajay Lal Non Executive Director

Chua Sock Koong Non Executive Director

Lord Evan Mervyn Davies Non Executive Director

N Kumar Non Executive Director

Pulak Prasad Non Executive Director

Rakesh Bharti Mittal Non Executive Director

Tan Yong Choo Non Executive Director

Manoj Kohli Joint Managing Director and CEO

Akhil Gupta Non Executive Director

Craig Ehrlich Non Executive Director

Hui Weng Cheong Non Executive Director

Nikesh Arora Non Executive Director

Rajan Bharti Mittal Non Executive Director


Salim Ahmed Salim Non Executive Director

Tsun-Yan Hsieh Non Executive Director

3.4 AWARDS AND ACHIVEMENTS:-

Airtel has won the ‘Most Preferred Cellular Service Provider Brand’ award at the CNBC

Awaaz Consumer Awards in Mumbai. This is 6th year in a row that Airtel has won the award

in this category. This year, the awards were based on an exhaustive consumer survey done by

The Nielsen Company. Over 3,000 consumers, spanning 19 cities and 16 states in India, rated

brands across different categories to choose brands which delivered true value for money.

Bharti Airtel has received the prestigious Business world-FICCI-SEDF Corporate Social

Responsibility Award 2009-2010. The FICCI Socio Economic Development Foundation

(FICCI-SEDF) and Business world CSR award was instituted in 1999 to recognize

exemplary responsible business practices by the Indian industry.


Financial Analysis:

Financial analysis is the analysis of financial statement of a Company to assess its financial

health and soundness of its management. ‘Financial Statement Analysis’ involves a study of

the financial statements of a company to ascertain its prevailing state of affairs and the

reasons thereof. Such a study would enable the public and the investors to ascertain whether

one company is more profitable than the other and also to state the causes and factors that are

probably responsible.

Ratio Analysis:-

Ratio analysis is a powerful tool of financial analysis. A ratio is defined as “the

indicated quotient of two mathematical expressions as relationship between two or

more things”. In financial analysis, a ratio is used as a bench mark for evaluating the

financial position and performance of a firm. The absolute accounting figures

reported in the financial statement do not provide a meaningful understanding of the

performance and financial position of a firm. An accounting figure conveys

meaningful message when it is related to some other relevant information. For

example Rs 5 corer net profit may look impressive but the firm’s performance can be

said to be good or bad only when the net profit figure is related to firm’s investments.

The relationship between two accounting figures expressed mathematically is known

as financial ratio. A ratio quantitative relationship, which can be in turn used to make

a qualitative judgment.

Classification of Ratios :-

Ratios may be classified in a number of ways keeping in view the particular

purpose. Ratios indicating profitability are calculated on the basis of the profit and

loss account; those indicating financial position are computed on the basis of balance

sheet. This classification is rather crude and unsuitable to determine the profitability


and financial position of business. To achieve these purpose ratios may be classified

as

1. Liquidity Ratios

2. Return On Investments Ratios

3. Solvency Ratios

4. Efficiency or Turnover Ratios

5. Profitability Ratios

6. Capital Market Ratios

Liquidity Ratios:-

i. Current Ratio

ii. Quick or Acid Test Ratio

iii. Debtors Ratio

iv. Debtors Turnover Ratio

v. Creditors Ratio

vi. Creditors Turnover Ratio

vii. Inventory Holding Period

viii. Inventory Turnover Ratio


4.1 Current Ratio (Working Capital Ratio)

= Current Assets

Current Liabilities

Table: 4.1 Current Ratio (2008 to 2012) (Rs in CRS.)

Analysis: The current ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 0.59, 2008-09 is 0.73,

2009-10 is 0.73, 2010-11 is 0.82 and 2011-12 is 1.34, the current ratio has increased by

23.73% in the year 2008-09, and in 2009-10 it remains constant. There was increase positive

value is found by 12.33% in year 2010-11 and increased by 63.41% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: From the above table we can indicate that the current assets are very less

compared to current liability of the company. The company doesn’t have enough current

assets in meeting their liabilities. So, the company can’t meet immediate emergencies.

The company needs to increase current assets in order to meet its short-term obligation. We

can conclude that the ratio isn’t favorable as the current asset is less than the current

liabilities.


YEAR CURRENT ASSETS

CURRENT LIABILITIES

RATIO

2007-08 8439.39 14362.33 0.59

2008-09 10466.63 14466.89 0.73

2009-10 10021.39 13638.30 0.73

2010-11 13730.10 16732.40 0.82

2011-12 23957.90 17842.70 1.34

4.2 Quick (Acid Test or Liquid) Ratio: = Quick Assets

Current Liabilities

Table: 4.2 Quick Ratio (2008 to 2012) (Rs in CRS.)

Analysis: The quick ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 0.58, 2008-09 is 0.72,

2009-10 is 0.72, 2010-11 is 0.82, and 2011-12 is 1.28. The quick ratio has increased by 24.14

% in the year 2008-09 and the year 2009-10 is increased by 1.39% there is increased positive

value is found by 12.33% for the year 2010-11 and increased by 56.10% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: As per as quick ratio is concern whether a firm has enough short-term

assets to cover its immediate liabilities without selling inventory. Here, Bharti Airtel review

that in 2008-09 increase their assets and then after very small percentage increase. That point

of Time it has not enough asset to cover its liabilities. Company ideal ratio is 1.5 so is below

the ratio. This is not good for company should be improving that point.


YEAR QUICK ASSETS

CURRENT LIABILITIES

RATIO

2007-08 8382.53 14362.33 0.58

2008-09 10404.48 14466.89 0.72

2009-10 9994.15 13638.30 0.73

2010-11 13695.70 16732.40 0.82

2011-12 22866.90 17842.70 1.28

4.3 Debtors Turnover Ratio

= Credit Sales

Avg. Debtors

Table: 4.3 Debtors Turnover Ratio (2008 to 2012) (Rs in CRS.)

Analysis: The debtors turnover ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 12.28 times,

2008-09 is 22.46 times, 2009-10 is 15.30 times, 2010-11 is 16.97 times, and 2011-12 is

18.45 times the debtors turnover ratio has increased by 82.90% in the year 2008-09, and in

2009-10 it decreased by 31.88%. There was increase positive value is found by 10.92% in

year 2010-11 and increased by 8.72% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: Higher turnover signifies speedy and effective collection. Lower turnover

indicates sluggish and inefficient collection leading to the doubts that receivables might

contain significant doubtful debts. Receivables collection period is expressed in number of

days. Here the company in 1st year 1month to collection & after decline then after increase.

Company does not maintain lower collection period.


YEAR CREDIT SALES AVG. DEBTORS RATIO DAYs

2007-08 25761.11 2097.49 12.28 30

2008-09 34048.32 1515.76 22.46 16

2009-10 35609.54 2327.52 15.30 24

2010-11 38015.80 2240.39 16.97 23

2011-12 41,603.80 2134.50 18.45 18

Return On Investments Ratios:-

i. Return On Net Worth

ii. Earnings Per Share (EPS)

iii. Cash Earnings Per Share (CEPS)

iv. Return On Capital Employed

4.4 Return on Net Worth

PAT – Preference Dividend x 100Net Worth

Table: 4.4 Return On Net Worth (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The return on net worth of the company for the year 2007-08 is 30.85, 2008-09 is

28.01, and 2009-10 is 25.66, 2010-11 is 17.49, and 2011-12 is 10.65. The return on net

worth has decreased by 9.21% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 8.39% in the year

2009-10 and again decreased by 31.84% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by 39.11%

in the year.

Interpretation: As per as net worth ratio states the return that shareholders could receive

on their investment in a company. Here the company continuous declines year by year this

not well for company. But actually is right because bank rate is low like 12 % is good for

investors.


YEAR PAT – PREFERENCE DIVIDEND

NET WORTH RATIO

2007-08 6244.19 20241.49 30.85

2008-09 7743.84 27643.97 28.01

2009-10 9426.15 36737.18 25.66

2010-11 7716.90 44111.60 17.49

2011-12 5266.00 49429.60 10.65

http://www.accountingtools.com/definition-shareholder

4.5 .09

PATNo. Equity Shares

Table: 4.5 Earnings Per Share (2008 to 2011) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The earnings per share of the company for the year 2007-08 is 32.90, 2008-09 is

40.79, and 2009-10 is 24.82, 2010-11 is 20.32, and 2011-12 is 13.87. The earnings per share

has increased by 23.98% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 39.15% in the year 2009-10

and again decreased by 18.13% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by 31.74% in the

year 2011-12.

Interpretation: As per as EPS ratio is concern the portion of a company's profit allocated

to each outstanding share of common stock. Earnings per share serve as an indicator of a

company’s profitability. Here the company shows high profitability so it is good for

company as well as investor.


YEAR PAT NO. OF EQUITY SHARES

RATIO

2007-08 6244.19 189.79 32.90

2008-09 7743.84 189.82 40.79

2009-10 9426.15 379.75 24.82

2010-11 7716.90 379.75 20.32

2011-12 5266.00 379.75 13.87

4.6 Return on Capital Employed

PBITCapital Employed

Table: 4.6 Earnings Per Share (2008 to 2011) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The return on capital employed of the company for the year 2007-08 is 16.87,

2008-09 is 26.80, and 2009-10 is 24.74, 2010-11 is 28.35 and 2011-12 is 0.64. The return on

capital employed has increased by 58.87% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 7.69% in

the year 2009-10 and increased by 14.59% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by

97.74% in the year.

Interpretation: It is expressed as a percentage and can be very revealing about the

industry a company operates in, the skills of the management and occasionally the general

business climate. Here, the company continuous increases efficiency. It is good for the

company.


YEAR PBIT CAPITAL EMPLOYED RATIO

2007-08 9450.20 56009.10 16.87

2008-09 11194.72 41776.10 26.80

2009-10 8747.65 35357.53 24.74

2010-11 7599.87 26811.63 28.35

2011-12 7514.80 11565.07 0.64

Solvency Ratios:-

i. Net Asset Value (NAV)

ii. Debt Equity Ratio

iii. Int. Coverage Ratio

iv. Debt Service Coverage Ratio

v. Proprietary Ratio

vi. Total Assets to Debt Ratio

vii. Liabilities to Equity Ratio

4.7 Net Asset Value

Net WorthNo. Equity Share

Table: 4.7 Net Asset Value (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The return on net asset value of the company for the year 2007-08 is 106.65,

2008-09 is 145.63, and 2009-10 is 96.74, 2010-11 is 116.16, and 2011-12 is 130.16. The net

asset value has increased by 36.55% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 33.57% in the

year 2009-10 and again increased by 20.01% in the year 2010-11, and again increased by

12.05% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: The net asset value in companies is the book value deducting liabilities

and intangible assets from the total assets. For companies, the net asset value is always used


YEAR NET WORTH NO. OF EQUITY SHARES

RATIO

2007-08 20241.49 189.79 106.65

2008-09 27643.97 189.82 145.63

2009-10 36737.18 379.75 96.74

2010-11 44111.60 379.75 116.16

2011-12 49429.60 379.75 130.16

in market book ratio or price book ratio to compare the net asset value of the company with

its market value. Here condition of company is good due to high profitability.

4.8 Debt Equity Ratio

Long Term DebtShare Holder Fund

Table: 4.8 Debt Equity Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The debt equity ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 0.32, 2008-09 is

0.29, and 2009-10 is 0.14, 2010-11 is 0.27, and 2011-12 is 0.28. The debt equity ratio has

decreased by 9.38% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 51.72% in the year 2009-10,

increased by 92.29% in the year 2010-11 and again increased by 3.70% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: A measure of a company's financial leverage calculated by dividing its

total liabilities by stockholders' equity. It indicates what proportion of equity and debt the

company is using to finance its assets. Here the company ratio so good in the current

situation as to the previous years. This is good for the company.


YEAR LONG TERM DEBT SHARE HOLDER FUND

RATIO

2007-08 6570.43 20241.49 0.32

2008-09 7713.65 27643.97 0.29

2009-10 5038.92 36737.18 0.14

2010-11 11897.50 44111.60 0.27

2011-12 14129.40 49429.60 0.28

4.9 Proprietary Ratio

Proprietary FundTotal Asset

Table: 4.9 Proprietary Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The proprietary ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 0.75, 2008-09 is

0.78, and 2009-10 is 0.88, 2010-11 is 0.79, and 2011-12 is 0.78. The proprietary ratio has

increased by 4.00% in the year 2008-09, and increased by 11.54% in the year 2009-10 and

decreased by 10.23% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by 1.27% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: Proprietary Ratio refers to a ratio which helps the creditors of the

company in seeing that their capital or loans which the creditors have given to the company

are safe. Ideal ratio is <1 so Here company has all year is <1 so it is good for company.


YEAR PROPRIETARY FUND

TOTAL ASSET RATIO

2007-08 20241.49 26811.84 0.75

2008-09 27643.97 35357.62 0.78

2009-10 36737.18 41776.12 0.88

2010-11 44111.60 56009.10 0.79

2011-12 49429.60 63559.00 0.78

4.10 Total Asset to Debt Ratio

Total AssetLong Term Debt

Table: 4.10 Total Asset to Debt Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The total assets to debt ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 4.08, 2008-

09 is 4.58, and 2009-10 is 8.29, 2010-11 is 8.71, and 2011-12 is 4.50. The total asset ratio

has increased by 12.25% in the year 2008-09, and increased by 81.00% in the year 2009-10

and decreased by 43.18% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by 4.46% in the year

2011-12.

Interpretation: As per as the total asset to debt ratio to debt ratio is concern ratio

between asset & long term debt. In the ratio total asset more than long term debt. So

here company total asset is high in 2009-10 but company can’t maintain that so

improve that point is actually it is good.


YEAR TOTAL ASSET LONG TERM DEBT

RATIO

2007-08 26811.84 6570.43 4.08

2008-09 35357.62 7713.65 4.58

2009-10 41776.12 5038.92 8.29

2010-11 56009.10 11897.50 4.71

2011-12 63559.00 14129.40 4.50

4.11 Liabilities to Equity Ratio

Total LiabilitiesShare Holders Equity

Table: 4.11 Liabilities to Equity Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The liabilities to equity ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 4.08, 2008-

09 is 4.58, and 2009-10 is 8.29, 2010-11 is 8.71, and 2011-12 is 1.28. The liabilities to

equity ratio has decreased by 3.03% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 10.94% in the

year 2009-10 and increased by 11.40% in the year 2010-11 and again increased by 0.79% in

the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: The liability to equity ratio is the relationship between the capital

contributed by creditors and the capital contributed by shareholders. It also shows the extent

to which shareholders' equity can fulfill a company's obligations to creditors in the event of

liquidation. Here the company increases their equity year by year. Ideal ratio is 1 here

company is work on more than 1 so it is good for the company.


YEAR TOTAL LIABILITIES

SHARE HOLDERS EQUITY

RATIO

2007-08 26811.84 20241.49 1.32

2008-09 35357.62 27643.97 1.28

2009-10 41776.12 36737.18 1.14

2010-11 56009.10 44111.60 1.27

2011-12 63559.00 49429.60 1.28

Efficiency Ratios or Turnover Ratios:-

i. Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio

ii. Net Worth Turnover Ratio

iii. Working Capital Turnover Ratio

4.12 Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio

Net SalesNet Block of Fixed Asset

Table: 4.12 Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The fixed asset turnover ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 1.35, 2008-

09 is 1.36, and 2009-10 is 1.27, 2010-11 is 0.93, and 2011-12 is 0.94. The fixed asset

turnover ratio has increased by 0.70% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 6.62% in the

year 2009-10 and again decreased by 26.77% in the year 2010-11 and increased by 1.07% in

the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: Ratio measures a company's ability to generate net sales from fixed-asset

investments - specifically property, plant and equipment (PP&E) - net of depreciation. A

higher fixed-asset turnover ratio shows that the company has been more effective in using the

investment in fixed assets to generate revenues. Here the company’s decline the use of the

asset continues decline. This is not good for the company.


YEAR NET SALES NET BLOCK OF FIXED ASSET

RATIO

2007-08 25761.11 19030.65 1.35

2008-09 34048.32 25013.36 1.36

2009-10 35609.54 28024.97 1.27

2010-11 38015.80 40700.80 0.93

2011-12 41603.80 43984.30 0.94

4.13 Net Worth Turnover Ratio

Net SalesNet Worth

Table: 4.13 Net Worth Turnover Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The net worth turnover ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 4.08, 2008-

09 is 4.58, and 2009-10 is 8.29, 2010-11 is 8.71, and 2011-12 is 0.84. The net worth

turnover ratio has decreased by 3.15% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 21.14% in the

year 2009-10 and decreased by 11.34% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by 2.32% in

the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: As per as Net worth Turnover Ratio is concern it show the

relationship between the net worth & net sales. Ideal ratio is 1.5 but company is not

performance better in this case ratio is continues decline. It is not good for the

company.


YEAR NET SALES NET WORTH RATIO

2007-08 25761.11 20241.49 1.27

2008-09 34048.32 27643.97 1.23

2009-10 35609.54 36737.18 0.97

2010-11 38015.80 44111.60 0.86

2011-12 41603.80 49429.60 0.84

4.14 Working Capital Turnover Ratio

Net SalesWorking Capital

Table: 4.14 Working capital Turnover Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The working capital turnover ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is -4.35,

2008-09 is -8.51, and 2009-10 is -9.85, 2010-11 is -12.66, and 2011-12 is 6.80. The working

capital turnover ratio has decreased by 95.63% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by

15.75% in the year 2009-10 and again decreased by 28.53% in the year 2010-11 and

increased by 153.71% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: The working capital turnover ratio concern to increasing ratio indicates

that working capital is more active; it is supporting, comparatively, higher level of

production and sales; it is being used more intensively. Here company is not performing well

due to negative working capital. This is not good for company.


YEAR NET SALES WORKING CAPITAL

RATIO

2007-08 25761.11 (-)5922.94 (-)4.35

2008-09 34048.32 (-)4000.26 (-)8.51

2009-10 35609.54 (-)3616.91 (-)9.85

2010-11 38015.80 (-)3002.30 (-)12.66

2011-12 41603.80 6115.20 6.80

Profitability Ratios:-

i. Gross Profit Ratio

ii. Profit Before Depreciation, Interest & Tax Ratio (PBDIT)

iii. Profit Before Interest & Tax Ratio (PBIT) or Operating Profit Ratio

iv. Profit Before Tax Ratio (PBT)

v. Net Profit or Profit After Tax Ratio (PAT)

vi. Defective Tax Rate

vii. Operating Ratio

4.14 PBDIT Ratio

PBDIT x 100Net Sales

Table: 4.14 PBDIT Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The PBDIT ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 41.79%, 2008-09 is

35.11%, and 2009-10 is 42.36%, 2010-11 is 35.89%, and 2011-12 is 32.28%. The PBDIT

ratio has decreased by 15.98% in the year 2008-09, and increased by 20.65% in the year

2009-10 and decreased by 15.27% in the year 2010-11 and again decreased by 10.05% in the

year 2011-12.

Interpretation: Financial metric used to assess a company's profitability by comparing its

revenue with earnings. More specifically, since PBDIT is derived from revenue, this metric


YEAR PBDIT NET SALES RATIO

2007-08 10766.45 25761.11 41.79%

2008-09 11953.93 34048.32 35.11%

2009-10 15084.80 35609.54 42.36%

2010-11 13643.90 38015.80 35.89%

2011-12 13430.80 41603.80 32.28%

would indicate the percentage of a company is remaining after operating expenses. Here high

ratio indicate good position in market this is good for company.

4.15 PBIT or Operating Profit Ratio

PBIT x 100Net Sales

Table: 4.15 PBIT Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The PBIT ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 28.47%, 2008-09 is

25.17%, and 2009-10 is 30.85%, 2010-11 is 23.76%, and 2011-12 is 18.06%. The PBIT

ratio has decreased by 11.59% in the year 2008-09, and increased by 22.57 in the year 2009-

10, decreased by 22.98% in the year 2010-11 and decreased by 23.98% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: As per as ratio is concern a higher operating margin means that the

company has less financial risk. Here company has average high ratio so the company is a

good position.


YEAR PBIT NET SALES RATIO

2007-08 7333.80 25761.11 28.47%

2008-09 8568.83 34048.32 25.17%

2009-10 10986.88 35609.54 30.85%

2010-11 9032.30 38015.80 23.76%

2011-12 7514.80 41603.80 18.06%

4.16 PBT Ratio

PBT x 100Net Sales

Table: 4.16 PBT Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The PBIT ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 26.71%, 2008-09 is

23.75%, and 2009-10 is 29.92%, 2010-11 is 23.00% and 2011-12 is 16.80%. The PBT ratio

has decreased by 11.08% in the year 2008-09, and increased by 25.99% in the year 2009-10

and again decreased by 23.12% in the year 2010-11 and decreased by 26.97% in the year

2011-12.

Interpretation: As per as ratio is concern a higher interest margin means that the

company has less financial risk. Here company has average high ratio so the company is a

good position.


YEAR PBT NET SALES RATIO

2007-08 6879.70 25761.11 26.71%

2008-09 8088.52 34048.32 23.75%

2009-10 10652.75 35609.54 29.92%

2010-11 8747.40 38015.80 23.00%

2011-12 6989.70 41603.80 16.80%

4.17 Net Profit Ratio

Net Profit x 100Net Sales

Table: 4.17 Net Profit Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The net profit ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 24.24%, 2008-09 is

22.74%, and 2009-10 is 26.47%, 2010-11 is 20.30% and 2011-12 is 12.66. The net profit

ratio has decreased by 6.19% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 16.40% in the year

2009-10 and again decreased by 23.31% in the year 2010-11 and decreased by 37.63% in the

year 2011-12.

Interpretation: This ratio is a measure of the overall profitability net profit is arrived at

after taking into accounts both the operating and non-operating items of incomes and

expenses. The ratio indicates what portion of the net sales is left for the owners after all

expenses have been met. Here the company high profit in year 2009-10 then decline. This is

not good for company. Company should be maintaining the NP ratio.


YEAR NET PROFIT NET SALES RATIO

2007-08 6244.19 25761.11 24.24%

2008-09 7743.84 34048.32 22.74%

2009-10 9426.15 35609.54 26.47%

2010-11 7716.90 38015.80 20.30%

2011-12 5266.00 41603.80 12.66%

Capital Market Ratios:-

i. Price Earnings Ratio (PE Ratio)

ii. Market Price to NAV Ratio

iii. Market Capitalization Ratio

iv. Yield to Investor

v. Price to Book Ratio

4.18 Price Earnings Ratio

Market Price of a ShareEarnings per Share

Table: 4.18 Price Earnings Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The net profit ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 12.77, 2008-09 is

12.46, and 2009-10 is 7.03, 2010-11 is 13.32 and 2011-12 is 18.11. The net profit ratio has

decreased by 2.43% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 43.57% in the year 2009-10 and

increased by 89.47% in the year 2010-11 and again increased by 35.96%.

Interpretation: The P/E looks at the relationship between the stock price and the

company’s earnings. Here the company has a high P/E ratio in last year it suggests that stock

is undervalued and investor can earn from it.


YEAR MARKET PRICE OF A SHARE

EARNINGS PER SHARE

RATIO

2007-08 420.00 32.90 12.77

2008-09 508.30 40.79 12.46

2009-10 174.60 24.82 7.03

2010-11 270.70 20.32 13.32

2011-12 273.30 15.09 18.11

4.19 Market Price to NAV Ratio

Market Price of a ShareNAV

Table: 4.19 Market Price to NAV Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The market price to NAV ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 3.94,

2008-09 is 3.49, and 2009-10 is 1.80, 2010-11 is 2.33 and 2011-12 is 2.10. The market price

to NVA ratio has decreased by 11.42% in the year 2008-09, and decreased by 48.42% in the

year 2009-10 and increased by 29.44% in the year 2010-11 and decreased by 9.87% in the

year.

Interpretation: As per as this ratio is concern the investment potential of a share. It also

offers opportunity to the company to buy back its own shares from the market. Hear the

company has higher ratio represent the ability to buy own shares in the market. Ideal ratio is

2 so all year is above the 2.



NAV RATIO

2007-08 420.00 106.65 3.94

2008-09 508.30 145.63 3.49

2009-10 174.60 96.74 1.80

2010-11 270.70 116.16 2.33

2011-12 273.30 130.16 2.10

4.20 Market Capitalization Ratio

Market Price of a Share x Total No. of Shares

Table: 4.20 Market Capitalization Ratio (2008 to 2012) (RS IN CRS.)

Analysis: The market capitalization ratio of the company for the year 2007-08 is 79787.40,

2008-09 is 96485.15, and 2009-10 is 66304.35, 2010-11 is 102798.33 and 2011-12 is

103785.67. The market capitalization ratio has increased by 20.93% in the year 2008-09, and

decreased by 31.28% in the year 2009-10 and increased by 55.04% in the year 2010-11 and

increased by 0.96% in the year 2011-12.

Interpretation: The ratio provides a base for total valuation of a company based on the

market price of its equity. It immensely helpful in negotiating mergers, takeover, acquisition

ect. Hear the company perfume well in market but decline way so company should be

improve & take expansion strategy.



TOTAL NO. OF SHARES

RATIO

2007-08 420.00 189.97 79787.40

2008-09 508.30 189.82 96485.15

2009-10 174.60 379.75 66304.35

2010-11 270.70 379.75 102798.33

2011-12 273.30 379.75 103785.67

Multi Step Profit & Loss Account (RS IN CRS.)

Particulars C.Y.(2011-12)

P.Y.(2010-11)

Gross Sales 41603.80 38015.80

Less: Excise duty - -

Net Sales 41603.80 38015.80

-Administrative, Selling and Other Expenses 27843.50 24590.10

+ other income (operating) 329.50 218.20

Profit Before Depreciation Interest and Tax - PBDIT 13430.80 13643.90

Profit Before Depreciation Interest and Tax - PBDIT 13430.80 13643.90

-Depreciation 5916.00 4193.70

-Amortisation - 417.90

-Impairment - -

Operating Profit – PBIT 7514.80 9032.30

Operating Profit – PBIT 7514.80 9032.30

-Interest & Finance Charges 1199.30 296.70

+Other Income (Non-Operating) - -

Profit Before Tax & Extra Ordinary Items - PBTEOT 6315.50 8735.60

Profit Before Tax & Extra Ordinary Items - PBTEOT 6315.50 8735.60

+/ - extra ordinary items 17.50 11.8

Profit Before Tax for the year – PBT-Y 6333.00 8747.40

+/ - Prior year adjustments - -

Profit Before Tax 6333.00 8747.40


Profit Before Tax 6333.00 8747.40

Provision for tax:

Current income tax 1226.20 1007.60

+/ - deferred income tax liability - -

+ fringe benefit tax - -

+/ - tax adjustments for previous year - -

Total Income Tax 1067.00 1030.50

Profit After Tax – NP/PAT 5266.00 7716.90

Analysis and Interpretation:

It equally, and probably, more to study analysis the profitability of the company at different

step or at intermediate levels, of business activities, in relation to net sales. It may be

observed that in case of Bharti Airtel profit has decline at every intermediate stage. However,

since absolute figures are not amenable to further analysis.


Horizontal Analysis:-

Horizontal Profit & Loss Acc of Bharti Airtel for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12:

(RS IN CRS.)

Particular2011-12(C. Y.)

2010-11(P. Y.)

Increase/Decrease

Increase/Decrease

(%)

Sales

(-) Administrative, Selling

and Other Expenses

PBDIT

(-) Depreciation & Amortization

PBIT

(-) Interest Expenses

PBT

(-) Income Tax

PAT

41603.80

27843.50

13760.30

5916.00

7844.30

545.90

7298.40

1067.00

6231.40

38015.80

24590.10

13425.70

4611.60

8814.10

308.50

8505.60

1030.50

7475.10

3588.00

3253.40

334.60

1304.40

(-)969.80

237.40

(-)1207.20

(-)196.10

(-)1243.70

9.44

13.23

2.50

28.28

(-)11.00

76.95

(-)14.19

(-)15.99

(-)16.64


Horizontal Balance Sheet of Bharti Airtel for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12:

(RS IN CRS.)

Particular2011-12(C. Y.)

2010-11(P. Y.)

Increase/Decrease

Increase/Decrease

(%)

Sources of Funds:-

Owned Funds:

Share Capital

Reserves & Surplus

Loan Funds:

Secured Loans

Unsecured Loans

Total

1898.80

47530.80

49429.60

2.90

14126.40

14129.30

63558.90

1898.80

42212.80

44111.60

17.10

11880.40

11897.50

56009.10

0.00

5318.00

5318.00

(-)14.20

2246.00

2231.80

7549.80

0.00

21.17

12.05

(-)83.04

18.90

18.76

13.48

Application of Funds:-

1.)Fixed Assets

Gross Block

Less: depreciation

Net Block

Capital work in progress

2.)Investments

3.)Current Assets, Loans &

Advances

Inventories

Sundry Debtors

Cash & Bank Balance

Fixed Deposit

Loans & Advances

70450.30

(-)26466.0

43984.30

1072.50

12337.80

32.10

2134.50

159.20

322.60

61437.50

(-)20736.7

40700.80

6497.60

11813.00

34.40

2375.80

126.60

7.20

9012.80

5729.30

3283.50

(-)5425.10

524.80

(-)2.3

(-)270.82

32.60

315.4

14.67

27.62

8.07

(-)83.45

4.44

26.28

(-)6.69

25.75

43.80


Less: Current Liabilities

Provisions

Net Current Assets:

4.) Miscellaneous Exp.

Profit & Loss Account

Total

23957.90

(-)17145.2

(-)697.50

6115.20

-

-

63559.00

11186.10

(-)16104.8

(-)627.60

(-)3002.30

-

-

56009.10

12771.80

1040.4

69.90

614.61

7549.90

114.17

6.46

11.13

(-)303.68

13.48

Analysis and Interpretation of Bharti Airtel:-

Profit & loss account

1. Net sales growth by 9.44%

2. Increase in expenses like Administrative, Selling and Other Expenses by 13.23% this

is very high to camper to sales growth so it is not good for the company.

3. Depreciation & Amortization even increase by 28.28% that shows that company

noncash charges increase not well for the company.

4. Interest Expenses is decline by 76.95% this is good for the company.

5. Decline in income tax by 15.99% due to low profit margin. This is not good for

company.

6. Decline in PAT by 16.64% is not good for company.

Balance Sheet

1. Total asset / liabilities up by 13.48%

2. Net worth up by 12.05%

3. Lone fund also decreased by 13.48% this shoe the company good will in the market to give lone.


Vertical Analysis:-

Vertical Profit & Loss Acc of Bharti Airtel for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12: (RS IN CRS.)

Particulars Schedule

Current Year(2011-12)

Previous Year(2010-11)

Inner Column

Outer Column

Inner Column

Outer Column

IncomeSales 41603.80 38015.80Less: returnOther Income 329.50 218.20

41933.30 38234.00ExpenditureAdministrative, Selling and Other Expenses

27843.50 24585.50

Interest & Finance Charges 1199.30 296.70Depreciation 5916.00 4193.70Impairment loss on fixed assets 417.90Adjustment due to (increase) / Decrease in stock of finished goods & W.I.P

(-)2.30 (-)7.20

Provision for contingencies34961.10 29510.20

Profit Before Taxation 6989.70 8747.40Provision for Income Tax 1067.00 1030.50Profit After Taxation 5730.00 7716.90


Vertical Balance Sheet of Bharti Airtel for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12: (RS IN CRS.)

ParticularsSchedule

No.Current Year

(2011-12)Previous Year

(2010-11)I Sources of funds

1.) Shareholder’s Funds: a.) Capital 1898.80 1898.80 b.) Reserves & Surplus 47530.80 42212.802.) Loan Funds a.) Secured Loans 2.90 17.10 b.) Unsecured Loans 14126.50 11880.40

Total 63559.00 56009.10II Application of Funds

1.) Fixed Assets a.) Gross Block 70450.30 61437.50 b.) less: depreciation (-)26466.00 (-)20736.70 c.) Net Block 43984.30 40700.80 d.) Capital work-in progress 1072.50 6497.602.) Investments 12337.80 11813.003.) Current Assets, Loans & Advances: a.) Inventories 32.10 34.40 b.) Sundry Debtors 2134.50 2375.80 c.) Cash And Bank Balances 159.20 126.60 d.) Fixed Deposit 322.60 7.20 e.) Loans And Advances 23957.90 11186.10 Less: Current Liabilities and Provisions a.) Liabilities 17145.20 16104.80 b.) Provisions 697.50 627.60 Net Current Assets: 6115.20 (-)3002.304.) a.) Miscellaneous Expenditure - - b.) Profit and Loss Account - -

Total 63559.00 56009.10



1. Income is increase as camper to previous year due to sales increase.

2. Expenditure more than the previous year this bed for company that’s way decline in profits margin.

3. Share holders fund is increase as camper to previous year this good for the company.

4. In application of fund is not proper managed by the company because net working capital is in negative but we show the some improvement in this. So, this not good for the company.

5. As all aspect of the vertical analysis part over all company tries to increase his performance by increases of his efficiency.


Vertical Analysis:-

Common size Profit & Loss Acc of Bharti Airtel for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12:

(RS IN CRS.)

Particulars Current Year(2011-12)

Previous Year(2010-11)

Amount % Amount %Sales 41603.80 100 38015.80 100(-)Selling, Administrating & Other Expenses

27843.50 66.92 24371.90 64.11

PDBIT 13760.30 33.07 13643.90 35.89(-)Depreciation & Amortization 5916.00 14.22 4599.80 12.10PBIT 7844.30 18.85 9044.10 23.71(-)Interest 545.90 1.31 296.70 0.78

PBT 7298.40 17.54 8747.40 23.01(-)Income Tax 1067.00 2.56 1030.50 2.71PAT 6231.40 14.98 7716.90 20.30


Common size Profit & Loss Acc of Bharti Airtel for the year 2010-11 & 2011-12:

(RS IN CRS.)

ParticularsCurrent

Year(2011-12)

%Previous

Year(2010-11)

%

Sources of funds1.) Shareholder’s Funds: a.) Capital 1898.80 2.99 1898.80 3.39 b.) Reserves & Surplus 47530.80 74.78 42212.80 75.372.) Loan Funds a.) Secured Loans 2.90 0.00 17.10 0.03 b.) Unsecured Loans 14126.50 22.22 11880.40 21.21

Total 63559.00 100 56009.10 100Application of Funds1.) Fixed Assets a.) Gross Block 70450.30 110.84 61437.50 109.69 b.) less: depreciation (-)26466.00 (-)41.64 (-)20736.70 (-)37.02 c.) Net Block 43984.30 69.21 40700.80 72.67 d.) Capital work-in progress 1072.50 1.69 6497.60 11.602.) Investments 12337.80 19.41 11813.00 21.093.) Current Assets, Loans & Advances: a.) Inventories 32.10 0.05 34.40 0.06 b.) Sundry Debtors 2134.50 3.36 2375.80 4.24 c.) Cash And Bank Balances 159.20 0.25 126.60 0.23 d.) Fixed Deposit 322.60 0.51 7.20 0.01 e.) Loans And Advances 23957.90 37.69 11186.10 19.97 Less: Current Liabilities and Provisions a.) Liabilities 17145.20 26.97 16104.80 28.75 b.) Provisions 697.50 1.10 627.60 1.12 Net Current Assets: 6115.20 9.62 (-)3002.30 (-)5.364.) a.) Miscellaneous Expenditure - - b.) Profit and Loss Account - -

Total 63559.00 100 56009.10 100



1. As camper to sales to other selling and administrative & other expense cover 64.11%

& 66.92% respectively for 2010-11 & 2011-12. cover the large amount of revenue so

that’s not good for the company and mostly affected the company performance.

2. Hear that profitability of company ‘s performance that sows as per profit before tax is

as camper to sale is 23.01 & 17.54 respectively 2010-11 & 2011-12.that shows that

company profit margin is low than capitalization rate that is 23.77% but is not good

for the company as well as investor.

3. According to reserve & surplus is 75.37% & 74.78% respectably to 2010-11 & 2011-

12. That’s show hat company is not maximize use of their funds in implication is not

proper meaner.

4. Company fixed asset is very high i.e. 72.67% & 69.21 % respectively 2010-11 &

2011-12. it shows that company bare low fix cost during operation that is good for the

company.

5. As camper the total asset to investment that 21.09 % & 19.41 % respectively in 2010-

11 & 2011-12 hear the company sales there in current year by same proportion this

not good for the company.

6. Overall performance of the company that better could in next year by that increasing

performance by sale and low cost that should be improving that.


Trend Analysis:- (RS IN CRS.)

Particulars 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08

Sales 41603.80 38015.80 35609.54 34048.32 25761.11Index 1.61 1.48 1.38 1.32 1

PBDIT 13760.30 13643.90 15084.80 11953.93 10766.45Index 1.28 1.27 1.40 1.11 1

PBIT 7844.30 9032.30 10986.88 8568.83 7333.80Index 1.07 1.23 1.50 1.17 1

PBT 7298.40 8747.40 10652.75 8088.52 6879.70Index 1.06 1.27 1.55 1.18 1

PAT 6231.40 7716.90 9426.15 7743.84 6244.19Index 1.00 1.24 1.51 1.24 1

Share Holders Fund 49429.60 44111.60 36737.18 27643.97 20241.49

Index 2.44 2.18 1.81 1.37 1

Total Debt 14129.40 11897.50 5038.92 7713.65 6570.34Index 2.14 1.81 0.77 1.17 1

Net Block 43984.30 40700.80 28024.97 25013.36 19030.65Index 2.31 2.14 1.47 1.35 1

Net Current Assets 6115.20 (-)3002.30 (-)3616.91 (-)4000.26 (-)5922.94Index 1.02 0.50 0.61 0.67 1

Total Assets/Total Liability 63559.00 56009.10 41776.12 35357.62 26811.80Index 2.37 2.09 1.56 1.32 1


Trend Analysis and Interpretation:

1. In sale continuously increase. This is good performance of the company that is currently company is market leader in telecom industry.

2. As per as profit after tax is concern high profit sow the high performance of the company hear the company 2009-10 is very high but company should be maintain that profitability.

3. Share holders fund continuous up by creating the good image in the market that’s shows the goodwill of the company.

4. Total debt of the company is in year 2009-10 is very low as camper the base year of 2007-08 this is good for company but in year 2011-12 is very high so that not maintain by the company.

5. net current asset of the company is in negative that not good for the company

6. Total asset/ total liability of the company is continues increasing that shows that turnover year by year that’s good for the company.


CONCLUSIONS:-

The company has been doing their activity effectively and efficiently. The company has a

sound long term solvency. The company can rise from the financial crush it is in right now

by taking proper steps to increase its sales of production and to minimize cost by maximize

utilization of resources. A already known there is a thin line between profitability and

liquidity and the company lost two years made a profit has very low and another two making

better profit. This shows the company in a good position and the management of the

company has much as better so that does way maintain the market leadership.


RECOMMENDATIONS:-

1. The company should maintain an adequate cash and bank balance in order to meet the

emergency requirements.

2. The current ratio of the company has decreasing year to year. The company must utilize

their current asset accurately.

3. The sales of the company go on increasing better to increase sales for more profit in

future.

4. Net profit of the company has decreased when compare to last year. Better to decrease

the unnecessary expenses of the company to increase the profit.

5. The Net working capital of the company has negative. Shows excess of current liabilities

over current assets. It must positive for future years.

6. Loans of the company increasing in year 2010 compare to previous year, it shows that

the profit was distributed to the interest, better it should not the same for next year.

7. Better to maintain the same amount of fixed assets in future for full utilize fixed assets.

8. Allowing debt for long period by company shows it is not strict in its debt collection.

Better it should collect its debt as early.

9. Better to maintain high return on share holder’s investments.

10. Better to curtail the debenture interest to avoid paying interest.

11. For the smooth operation of the company if must make sure that it is made liquid in the

coming year, because right now a lot rests on the operation of the business.


A study on Analysis of Financial Statements of Bharti Airtel

Documents

comparative

secondary

debtors turnover

bharti acquired

fund flow

firms financial

debt equity

sunil mittal