This is an Open Access document downloaded from ORCA, Cardiff University's institutional repository: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/117190/ This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted to / accepted for publication. Citation for final published version: Laing, Catherine 2019. A role for onomatopoeia in early language: evidence from phonological development. Language and Cognition 11 (2) , pp. 173-187. 10.1017/langcog.2018.23 file Publishers page: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.23 <https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.23> Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. This version is being made available in accordance with publisher policies. See http://orca.cf.ac.uk/policies.html for usage policies. Copyright and moral rights for publications made available in ORCA are retained by the copyright holders.
28
Embed
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
This is a n Op e n Acces s doc u m e n t dow nloa d e d fro m ORCA, Ca r diff U nive r si ty 's
ins ti t u tion al r e posi to ry: h t t p s://o rc a.c a r diff.ac.uk/117 1 9 0/
This is t h e a u t ho r’s ve r sion of a wo rk t h a t w as s u b mi t t e d to / a c c e p t e d for
p u blica tion.
Cit a tion for final p u blish e d ve r sion:
Laing, Ca t h e rin e 2 0 1 9. A role for ono m a topo eia in e a rly lan g u a g e: evid e nc e
fro m p ho nological d evelop m e n t. Lang u a g e a n d Cog ni tion 1 1 (2) , p p. 1 7 3-1 8 7.
1 0.1 0 1 7/la n gcog.20 1 8.2 3 file
P u blish e r s p a g e: h t t p s://doi.o rg/10.10 1 7/lan gco g.20 1 8.23
< h t t p s://doi.o rg/10.10 1 7/la n gcog.2 01 8.23 >
Ple a s e no t e:
Ch a n g e s m a d e a s a r e s ul t of p u blishing p roc e s s e s s uc h a s copy-e di ting,
for m a t ting a n d p a g e n u m b e r s m ay no t b e r eflec t e d in t his ve r sion. For t h e
d efini tive ve r sion of t his p u blica tion, ple a s e r ef e r to t h e p u blish e d sou rc e. You
a r e a dvise d to cons ul t t h e p u blish e r’s ve r sion if you wish to ci t e t his p a p er.
This ve r sion is b ein g m a d e av ailable in a cco r d a n c e wit h p u blish e r policie s.
S e e
h t t p://o rc a .cf.ac.uk/policies.h t ml for u s a g e policies. Copyrigh t a n d m o r al r i gh t s
for p u blica tions m a d e available in ORCA a r e r e t ain e d by t h e copyrig h t
hold e r s .
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
1
A Role for Onomatopoeia in Early Language: Evidence from Phonological
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J. & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda
licensing in the acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49, 137-173.
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s
production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99-127.
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Linguistics
and Language Compass, 6, 654–672.
Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K. (2017). An inverse relation between expressiveness and
grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special
reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 501–532.
Elsen, H. (1991). Erstspracherwerb: Der Erwerb des deutschen Lautsystems. Wiesbaden:
Deutscher Universitaets Verlag.
Elsen, H. (1994). Phonological constraints and overextensions. First Language, 14, 305–315.
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994).
Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for
Research in Child Development, 59, i-185.
Fernald, A., & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and
American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 64, 637–656.
Giard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object
recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
21
Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 473–490.
Hashimoto, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., Nose, I., Haji, T., & Kojima, S. (2006). The neural
mechanism associated with the processing of onomatopoeic sounds. NeuroImage, 31,
1762–1770.
Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language
acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 20130298.
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb
learning. Cognition, 109, 54–65.
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals. The Hague:
Mouton.
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word
learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35, 575–586.
Kauschke, C., & Hofmeister, C. (2002). Early lexical development in German: a study on
vocabulary growth and vocabulary composition during the second and third year of life.
Journal of Child Language, 29, 735–757.
Kauschke, C. & Klann-Delius, G. 2007. Characteristics of maternal input in relation to
vocabulary development in children learning German. In I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina
(eds.) Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as
an Explanatory Concept (pp. 181-204). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn &
C. Stoel-Gammon (eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
22
(pp. 65-90). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Kim, N., & Davis, B. L. (2015). A phonetic approach to consonant repetition in early words.
Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 193–203.
Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics, Linguistics, 35,
379–415.
Kunnari, S. (2002). Word length in syllables: Evidence from early word production in
Finnish. First Language, 22, 199–135.
Laing, C. E. (2014). A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First
Language, 34, 387–405.
Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning:
Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32-45.
Laing, C. E. (forthcoming). Phonological motivation for the acquisition of onomatopoeia: An
analysis of early words. Language Learning and Development.
Laing, C. E., Vihman, M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2017). How salient are onomatopoeia in the
early input? A prosodic analysis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language,
44, 1117–1139.
Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word
learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42,
1274–1281.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Massaro, D. W., & Perlman, M. (2017). Quantifying iconicity’s contribution during language
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
23
acquisition: implications for vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Communication, 2, 1–14.
Masuda, K. (2002). A phonetic study of sound symbolism. Unpublished PhD Thesis.
University of Cambridge, UK.
Mazuka, R., Kondo, T. & Hayashi, A. (2008). Japanese mothers' use of specialised
vocabulary in infant-directed speech: Infant-directed vocabulary in Japanese. In N.
Masataka (Ed.) The Origins of Language: Unravelling Evolutionary Forces, Tokyo:
Springer.
McLeod, S., & Crowe, K. (2018). Children's Consonant Acquisition in 27 Languages: A
Cross-Linguistic Review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1-26.
Menn, L., & Vihman, M. M. (2011). Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or
artefacts of analysis? In N. Clements & R. Ridouane (Eds.), Where Do Phonological
Features Come From? (pp. 261–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Multisensory visual-auditory
object recognition in humans: A high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex,
14, 452–465.
Nielsen, A. & Dingemanse, M. (2018). Iconicity in word learning and beyond: A critical
review. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9hgsk
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (2009). Language acquisition and socialization: Three
developmental stories and their implications. Linguistic anthropology: A reader,
Oxford:Wiley Blackwell, pp. 263-301.
Ortega, G. (2017). Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: A review. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 1–14.
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
24
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence
for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental
Child Psychology, 114, 173–186.
Pačesová, J. (1968). The development of vocabulary in the child. Brno, Czech Republic:
Universita J. E. Purkyne.
Peeters, D. (2006). Processing consequences of onomatopoeic iconicity in spoken language
comprehension. In 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016)
(pp. 1637–1642).
Perniss, P., Lu, J. C., Morgan, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Mapping language to the world:
The role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science, 21, e12551.
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity in English and Spanish and its
relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE, 10, e0137147.
Sasamoto, R., & Jackson, R. (2016). Onomatopoeia - showing-word or saying-word?
relevance theory, lexis, and the communication of impressions. Lingua, 175, 36–53.
Stoel-Gammon, C., & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological
development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–271.
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N., & Marchman, V. A. (2008).
Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology, 44, 929–938.
Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., Woll, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). The road to language
learning is iconic: evidence from British Sign Language. Psychologica Science, 23,
1443–1448.
Tsujimura, N. (2005). Mimetic verbs and innovative verbs in the acquisition of Japanese. In
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
25
Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society (pp. 371–382).
Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: Its scope and function in child language. In J.
H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language (pp. 281-334). Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
Vinson, D. P., Cormier, K., Denmark, T., Schembri, A., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). The British
Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior
Research Methods, 40, 1079–1087.
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
26
Table 1: Consonant harmony and CV structures in onomatopoeia across five infants’ data.
See Laing (forthcoming) for full set of examples.
Infant Data source Consonant harmony CV
William US English
Demuth, Culbertson &
Alter (2006)
beep beep [biːpbi:]
quack quack [ɡʊkwæ]
brm brm [bɜbɜ]
beep [biʔ]
baa [bɑˈɑː]
moo [mu:]
Nathan French
Demuth & Tremblay (2008)
tchou tchou ‘choo choo’ [tityː]
toot toot ‘beep beep’ [kaka]
pin-pon ‘nee-naw’ (siren) [papo]
boum ‘boom’ [bɔː]
M
Spanish-English bilingual
Deuchar & Quay (2001)
quack/cuac [kak]
bow-wow [bəʊwəʊ]
woof woof [wʊfwʊf]
meow [maʊ]
baa [be]
Annalena German
Elsen (1991)
tööt ‘toot’ (train) [bɪp]
brum [ʙm]
kikeriki ‘cock-a-doodle-doo’
[kɪːkɪːç]
meh ‘baa’ [me:]
tööt ‘toot’ [bɪ]
P Czech
Pačesová (1968)
tudu ‘honk’ (car) [tidi:]
kaka ‘quack’ [ka:kaka]
ticktak ‘tick tock’ (clock) [tsita]
bebe ‘baa’ [be:]
mnau ‘meow’ [na:]
bac ‘bang’ [ba:]
A role for onomatopoeia in phonological development
27
i Menn & Vihman (2011) judged a word to be ‘acquired’ if it was produced spontaneously by the infant during a
recording session in the home between age 9-18 months. ii Onomatopoeia (words that represent sounds; Laing, 2014), ideophones (words that represent all manner of
sensory experiences; Dingemanse, 2012) and mimetics (words in Japanese that represent sensory experiences;
Kita, 1997) are differentiated here, though these terminologies are interrelated. iii Kita’s account discusses mimetics specifically. iv Thank you to the anonymous reviewer for this suggestion