A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints Konstantinos Tserpes a , Alberto Barroso-Caro b , Paolo Andrea Carraro c , Vinicius Carrillo Beber d , Ioannis Floros a , Wojciech Gamon e , Marcin Kozłowski f , Fabio Santandrea g , Moslem Shahverdi h , Davor Skejić i , Chiara Bedon j , and Vlatka Rajčić i a Laboratory of Technology & Strength of Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; b Group of Elasticity and Strength of Materials, University of Seville, Seville, Spain; c Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; d Polymeric Materials and Mechanical Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM, Bremen, Germany; e Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Silesian, Poland; f Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Silesian, Poland; g Department of Applied Mechanics, RISE, Research Institutes of Sweden, Sweden; h Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland; i Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; j Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy ABSTRACT In the framework of the Cost Action CERTBOND (Reliable road- map for certification of bonded primary structures), a wide group of researchers from 27 European Countries have had the opportunity to work on the topic of certification of bonded joints for primary structural applications from different engi- neering sectors such as the aerospace, automotive, civil engi- neering, wind energy and marine sectors. Since virtual testing and optimization are basic tools in the certification process, one of the key objectives of CERTBOND is to critically review some of the available models and failure theories for adhesive joints. The present paper summarizes the outcome of this task. Nine differ- ent models/theories are described in detail. Specifically, reviewed are the Classical Analytical Methods, the Process Zone Methods, Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM), the Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT), the Stress Singularity Approach, Finite Fracture Mechanics (FFM), the Cohesive Zone Method (CZM), the Progressive Damage Modeling method and the Probabilistic methods. Also, at the end of the paper, the modeling of temperature effects on adhesive joints have been addressed. For each model/theory, information on the metho- dology, the required input, the main results, the advantages and disadvantages and the applications are given. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 08 March 2021 Accepted 03 June 2021 KEYWORDS Adhesive bonding; analytical modeling; numerical modeling; debonding; fracture mechanics; cohesive zone modeling; probabilistic modeling CONTACT Konstantinos Tserpes [email protected] Laboratory of Technology & Strength of Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece. This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article. THE JOURNAL OF ADHESION 2022, VOL. 98, NO. 12, 1855–1915 https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2021.1941903 © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints
May 28, 2023
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Related Documents
