A REPORT ON UNORGANISED SERVICE SECTOR IN DELHI

GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT OOFF NNCCTT OOFF DDEELLHHII

AA RREEPPOORRTT OONN

UUNNOORRGGAANNIISSEEDD SSEERRVVIICCEE SSEECCTTOORR IINN

DDEELLHHII

DDIIRREECCTTOORRAATTEE OOFF EECCOONNOOMMIICCSS && SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCSS RROOOOMM NNOO.. 114488,, OOLLDD SSEECCRREETTAARRIIAATT

DDEELLHHII -- 111100005544

PREFACE

The Present Report on “Service sector (Un-organised ) in Delhi” is the

first of it’s kind brought out by this directorate on the basis of sample survey

conducted under the 57th NSS (2001-02) round. This was a follow-up survey

of fourth economic census held in 1998.

This report contains valuable data on operational and economic

features of un-organised service sector enterprises (other than trade

&finance) in Delhi with special reference to it’s number, employment, value

added and other important features of this sector . The data available from

the report will be useful in the process of industrial planning, preparation

of state income estimates and a host of other closely related purposes in both

government departments and other public and private institutions.

This report was prepared by the Data Processing & Analysis Unit of

this Directorate under the able guidance of Sh. N.T.Krishna, Assistant

Director. The extraordinary efforts put in by Sh. Harmeet Singh Maddh,

Statistical Investigator, in the data analysis and report making stages

deserves special mention. The role played by socio-economic unit in

collection of data from the field against all odds is appreciated. The data

processing was done by the EDP unit under the close guidance of Sh. K.S.

Bansal, System Analyst

The technical assistance provided by National Sample Survey

Organisation, Government of India and the cooperation extended by the

households and enterprises is acknowledged.

Delhi DR. B.K. SHARMA Date: Mar 2005 DIRECTOR

TTEEAAMM

SSHH.. NN..TT.. KKRRIISSHHNNAA :: AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT DDIIRREECCTTOORR

SSMMTT.. PPUUSSHHPPAA RRAANNII :: RREESSEEAARRCCHH OOFFFFIICCEERR

SSMMTT.. TTRRIIVVEENNII SSHHAARRMMAA :: RREESSEEAARRCCHH OOFFFFIICCEERR

SSHH.. BBAANNWWAARRII LLAALL :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT

SSMMTT.. KKAAMMLLEESSHH KKUUMMAARRII :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT

SSHH.. RRAAJJKKUUMMAARR :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT

SSHH.. YY..CC.. KKHHAARREE :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT

SSHH.. MM..WW.. DDEESSHHKKAARR :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT

SSHH.. RRAAKKEESSHH KKOOHHLLII :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL IINNVVEESSTTIIGGAATTOORR

SSHH.. HHAARRMMEEEETT SSIINNGGHH MMAADDDDHH :: SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL IINNVVEESSTTIIGGAATTOORR

EEDDPP UUNNIITT

SSHH.. KK..SS.. BBAANNSSAALL :: SSYYSSTTEEMM AANNAALLYYSSTT

SSHH.. AASSHHUUTTOOSSHH :: DDEEOO ‘‘CC’’

SSMMTT.. RRIITTAA :: DDEEOO ‘‘BB’’

SSMMTT.. SSUUNNIITTAA KKUUKKRREEJJAA :: DDEEOO ‘‘BB’’

SSMMTT.. UUSSHHAA KKIIRRAANN :: DDEEOO ‘‘BB’’

SSMMTT.. PPUUSSHHPPAA CCHHUUGGHH :: DDEEOO ‘‘BB’’

SSMMTT.. MMAANNJJUU BBHHAALLLLAA :: DDEEOO ‘‘BB’’

SSMMTT.. PPRROOMMIILLAA :: DDEEOO ‘‘BB’’

FFIIEELLDD OOFFFFIICCEERRSS

SSHH.. GG..SS.. RRAAWWAATT :: AASSSSIISSTTAANNTT DDIIRREECCTTOORR

SSHH.. JJ..PP.. BBAAGGEESSHHWWAARR :: RREESSEEAARRCCHH OOFFFFIICCEERR

SSHH.. KKAANNHHIIYYAA LLAALL :: RREESSEEAARRCCHH OOFFFFIICCEERR

SSUUPPPPOORRTTIINNGG SSTTAAFFFF

SSHH.. SSAANNTTUU SSIINNGGHH :: CCLLAASSSS IIVV

SSHH.. SSUURRIINNDDEERR SSIINNGGHH :: CCLLAASSSS IIVV

SSHH.. BBHHAARRAATT SSAAHH :: CCLLAASSSS IIVV

TABLE OF CONTENTS PPAAGGEE NNOO..

HHIIGGHHLLIIGGHHTTSS ii--iivv

SSEECCTTIIOONN OONNEE IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN 11--33

SSEECCTTIIOONN TTWWOO SSAAMMPPLLEE DDEESSIIGGNN && EESSTTIIMMAATTIIOONN PPRROOCCEEDDUURREE 44--1111

SSEECCTTIIOONN TTHHRREEEE CCOONNCCEEPPTTUUAALL FFRRAAMMEEWWOORRKK 1122--2211

SSEECCTTIIOONN FFOOUURR SSUUMMMMAARRYY FFIINNDDIINNGGSS 2222--6633

SSEECCTTIIOONN FFIIVVEE SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL TTAABBLLEESS SSTT 11 –– SSTT--4488

i

SSEERRVVIICCEE SSEECCTTOORR IINN DDEELLHHII ((UUNN--OORRGGAANNIISSEEDD))

EEXXEECCUUTTIIVVEE SSUUMMMMAARRYY

The following are the main highlights of the survey conducted during NSS

57th round between July 2001 and June 2002.

Enterprises:

The total numbers of enterprises operating in NCT of Delhi and falling with-in the

purview of unorganised service sector were estimated as 244873.

Out of them 11467 (4.68%) were in rural areas while 233406 (95.32%) were

operating in urban areas.

169577 (69.25%) were household enterprises (OAE) operating without any hired

labour and 75296 (30.75%) establishments with at least one hired worker.

In Delhi, Community, social and personal service activities including other

transport accounted for 22.57% followed by Real estate, Renting and Business

activities with 14.38% share while Restaurants contributed 14.06%. These three

categories taken together contributed for more than 50 percent of the total number

of enterprises.

Delhi with 1.7% share in the total number of Enterprises had occupied 16th

position among 35 States/UTs in the country.

Estimated Employment:

The total employment provided by the un-organised service sector enterprises was

about 5.92 lakhs.

Out of the total employment 15885 persons (2.68%) were employed in rural

enterprises while 575909 persons (97.32%) in the enterprises operating in urban

Delhi.

ii

About 2.21 lakh persons (37.36%) were employed in household enterprises

(OAE’s) and 3.71 lakh persons (62.74%) were gainfully employed in

establishments.

Sex-wise distribution of employment in this sector revealed that out of the total,

15.50% were females.

Out of the total persons employed 47.86% were working owners, 47.03% hired

workers and the rest of 5.11% fall in the category of other workers which includes

un-paid house hold workers, helpers etc.

The average employment per enterprise in rural areas was 1.39 persons and that of

urban areas was 2.47 persons.

In Delhi average employment of own account enterprises stood at 1.3 persons and

in establishments this was as high as 4.93 persons.

Enterprises dealing with Community/Social/Personal services etc accounted for

19.44% followed by Health & Social Work with 16.12 % and Restaurants

contributed 15.62 % of the total employment. These enterprises taken together

provide employment for more than 50 % of the persons employed in this Sector.

Delhi with 2.3% share in the total employment had secured 14th position among

35 States/UTs in the country.

Out of the total persons employed only 1.91% were employed on Part-time basis

in these enterprises.

The incidence of part-time employment among males was about 1.72% where as it

was about 2.98% in case of females.

The participation of females in the Establishments (18.71%) was found to be more,

when compared to that of household enterprises (10.99%).

Out of the total of 278335 hired workers, more than 70% were found to be skilled.

iii

Delhi had jointly shared the 5th position in the All India along with Chandigarh

(UT) and Andaman Nicobar Island (UT) for average employment in the service

sector enterprises.

Financial Indicators:

Delhi has recorded the highest combined Gross Value Added per worker as well as

per enterprise among 35 States/UTs in the country.

The Gross Value Added per annum per enterprise in the unorganised service sector

was Rs. 1.52 lakhs.

The GVA per enterprise of Household enterprises (OAE) was estimated at Rs.

0.49 lakh as against Rs. 3.84 lakhs earned by establishments.

The annual GVA of an enterprise in urban areas (1.57 lakhs) is more than three

times that of the rural areas (Rs 0.49 lakh).

The Value Added per worker in this sector was estimated as Rs. 62998 per year.

Value added per worker in OAE’s was Rs. 37844 and that of establishments was

Rs. 77939 per annum.

The Value Added per worker was relatively high in enterprises located in urban

areas (Rs. 63770) when compared to that of (Rs.35011) in rural areas.

The Market value of fixed capital per enterprise was worked out to about Rs. 2.96

lakh per enterprise. It was only about Rs. 1.00 lakh per OAE, and in case of

establishments it was worked out to Rs. 7.35 lakhs.

Land accounts about 59% of the total fixed assets of an enterprise in Delhi while

Building, Plant, Transport and Tools had a share of 21%, 5%, 7% and 8%

respectively.

About 20.03% of these enterprises were expanding, 52.61% stagnant, 10.93%

were contracting as per the assessment of the entrepreneurs.

iv

Other Features:

Out of the total enterprises, 99.26% were perennial in nature as they were

operational throughout the year.

About 25.30% of these enterprises were household based. 57.93% have

independent premises outside household and 16.77% were mobile/hawkers type.

Out of the total own-account enterprises 31.11% were located within household

premises; however this proportion was only 12.22% for establishments.

53.88% enterprises were having only one person looking after the affairs of the

enterprise. Enterprises employing 2 persons were to the extent of 20.62%, 16.81%

employed in the range of 3-5 persons , 6.31% in 6-9 category while enterprises

employing 10 or more persons were 2.38% only.

94.28% of these enterprises were proprietary in nature. 4.4% were partnership type

and rest of the 1.32% were operating as cooperative society / limited company etc.

About 9.75% of the enterprises were owned and managed by women.

Social group of owner of private service sector enterprises indicated that 12.59%

were held by SC, 13.94% by OBC and remaining 73.47% were headed by persons

belonging to other social groups.

Shortage of capital (16.42%), local problems (13.64%), competition from other

units (13.35%) and Power cut (10.14%)were the notable problems faced by the

entrepreneurs.

Only 3.80% of these enterprises were found to be maintaining book of accounts.

About 2.42% of the total enterprises were pursuing mixed activities.

The share of enterprises found registered under some authority or act was 93.25%

among Own Account enterprises and 91.17% among establishments.

Only 3.14% of the enterprises in Delhi have availed any type of assistance. ⌧⌧⌧

SSEECCTTIIOONN OONNEE

IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN

1

SECTION ONE

IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN

ervice sector is the backbone of the Delhi’s economy as it contributes about 78%

of the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) and 54% of gainfully employed in

Delhi are in this segment. According to the 4th economic census (1998) nearly

79% of the enterprises were operating in this sector. The contribution of this sector in

terms of state income (NSDP at Constant Prices) has been growing steadily year after year

i.e. from 69% in 1980-81 to 78% during 2003-04. This includes both organised and un-

organised segment of service sector.

The un-organized segment of the economic activities which are known for their

high rate of growth as well as mortality makes the task of their coverage and quantification

very complex, as they operate in multiple forms, sizes etc. At the same time it is inevitable

to measure this sector from time to time as it makes significant contribution to the economy

in terms of employment, value-added etc. Sample surveys under NSS rounds have been

considered as the time tested method for assessing the contribution and magnitude of

growth of this un-organized segment in India. The NSS 57th round conducted during July

2001 – June 2002 covered unorganized service sector (excluding trade and finance) as a

follow-up of Fourth Economic Census held during 1998.

MMEEAANNIINNGG SSCCOOPPEE && CCOOVVEERRAAGGEE

The main objective of this survey of unorganised service sector enterprises is to

ascertain the length and breadth of this segment, their economic & operational

S

2

characteristics, employment generated and above all its contribution to the economy of the

state in terms of value added. The term “service sector” is interchangeably used with the

term tertiary sector, denotes variety of services , mostly intangible form, generated to

sustain the primary and the secondary sector of the economy. The term ‘unorganised ‘may

broadly be taken to mean those enterprises whose activities are not regulated under any

statute or Act. This survey covered un-incorporated proprietary, partnership firms, co-

operative societies, trusts, public and private limited companies not registered under

Section-2(m)(i) and 2(m)(ii) of the Factories Act 1948 (those employing 10 or more

workers using power and those employing 20 or more but not using power). Further,

enterprises run by Government/Public Sector are exempted from the coverage of the

survey.

The own-account and establishments engaged in the following fields of activity

were covered under the survey.

i) Storage and Warehousing ( NIC 6302)

ii) Hotels & Restaurants ( 551 & 552)

iii) Post and Telecommunication (64)

iv) Transport : Passenger/Goods Transport by mechanized and non-

mechanized means of transport (6021, 60221, 60231 ,601 ,60222 ,60232 ,

61 ,6301 ,6303 ,6304 ,6309 )

v) Real estate, Renting and Business activities ( 70-74)

vi) Health (85)

vii) Education (80)

viii) Other community, Social and Personal services (90-93).

3

The entrepreneurial activities in the field of trade and finance were excluded from

this survey.

SCHEME OF THE REPORT The report is presented in 5 sections. Section two and three deal with ‘sample

design and estimation procedure’ and ‘conceptual framework’ respectively. The analysis of

characteristics of service sector enterprises is presented in section four while section five

contains detailed statistical tables.

⌧⌧⌧

SSEECCTTIIOONN TTWWOO

SSAAMMPPLLEE DDEESSIIGGNN && EESSTTIIMMAATTIIOONN PPRROOCCEEDDUURREE

4

SECTION TWO

SSAAMMPPLLEE DDEESSIIGGNN

AANNDD EESSTTIIMMAATTIIOONN PPRROOCCEEDDUURREE

The fifty-seventh round was of one year duration starting from 1st July 2001 and

ending on 30th June 2002.The one year survey period was further sub- divided into four

sub-rounds as given below:

SUB ROUND PERIOD 1 JULY – SEPTEMBER 2001 2 OCTOBER – DECEMBER 2001 3 JANUARY – MARCH 2002 4 APRIL – JUNE 2002

SAMPLE DESIGN

A stratified multi-stage sampling design was adopted. The first stage units were

villages in rural areas and for the urban sector the first stage units (fsu’s) were the Urban

Frame Survey blocks (UFS). The Ultimate stage units were households/ enterprises in

both rural and urban areas.

SAMPLE SIZE

A total of 24 villages and 408 blocks were surveyed under state sample as against

the central sample of 8 villages and 136 blocks. The samples were divided equally into

sub-sample 1 and sub-sample 2 in both the rural and urban sectors.

ALLOCATION OF SAMPLE FSU’S BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN SECTORS

Total sample size ( i.e. total number of villages and blocks to be surveyed) was

allocated between the rural and urban sectors in proportion to population as per 1991

population with double weightage to urban sector.

5

SAMPLING FRAME FOR FIRST STAGE UNITS:

RURAL : List of villages as per 1998 Economic Census were used as the sampling

frame for the selection of fsu’s.

URBAN: The list of Urban Frame Survey (UFS) blocks as per 1998 Economic

Census constituted the sampling frame.

STRATIFICATION: In this survey a special and general strata were devised . Special

strata :One special strata( numbered as 9) for rural and urban sector each was formulated

at state/ UT level consisting of one big unit of an activity under coverage on the basis of

its number of workers or having large number of workers engaged in the same activity as

presented below. All fsu’s of this category were surveyed

S.No.

Activity

At least one big

unit in an FSU

with no. of

workers

Total

number of

workers in

an FSU

1. Storage & warehousing 200 300

2. Hotels 200 350

3. Post & telecommunications 200 250

4. Mechanized road transport 250 400

5. Real estimate, renting and business activities

300 750

6. Health and social work 500 550

7. Restaurants 300 350

8. Education 30 550

9. Other community, social and personal service activities & other transport 400 700

6

General strata:This strata was formed from the FSU other than those categorized under

special strata.

Rural : Delhi was taken as a single district and hence it constituted a single

stratum.

Urban: Stratification adopted for state sample is given in table below:

STRATUM NO.

COMPOSITION OF STRATA ( Population as per 1991 Census)

1 all towns with population less than or equal to10 lakhs

2 Each city with population 10 lakhs or more

SUB-STRATIFICATION FOR RURAL & URBAN SECTORS :

The FSU’s of general strata were grouped into 11 sub-strata as given below:

Sub-stratum 1; All fsu’s having at least one establishment of storage and warehousing;

Sub-stratum 2; All fsu’s (excluding those in ss1) having atleast one establishment of

hotel

Sub-stratum 3; All fsu’s (excluding the sub strata already formed) having atleast one

establishment of post and telecommunication.


establishment of mechanized transport;

Sub–stratum5; All fsu’s (excluding the sub strata already formed) having atleast one

establishment of real estate, renting,& business activities


establishment of health and social work.

Sub-stratum 7; All fsu’s (excluding the sub strata already formed) having at least one

establishment of restaurant.


establishment of education.

Sub–stratum 9; All fsu’s (excluding the sub strata already formed) having at least one

establishment of other community, social and personal service activities

and other transport.


own account enterprise in any of categories under the coverage.

Sub-stratum11; All other fsu’s of the stratum.

7

ALLOCATION OF SAMPLE TO STRATA AND SUB-STRATA:

The total sample FSU’s has been allocated to state/UT broadly in proportion to

number of workers in un organised sector enterprises under the coverage of this round

as per Economic Census 1998. Rural/Urban samples were further allocated to various

strata in proportion to the total workers. Allocations among sub-strata of a stratum was

again been done in proportion to the total workers with weights 4 for SS1, 3 for SS

2,4,5,7 and 9; 2 for SS 3&6 ; and 1 for SS 8,10&11.

FORMATION OF HAMLET-GROUPS/SUB-BLOCKS

Large villages/blocks having

i) Approximate present population 1200 or more, or

ii) Approximate present number of non-agriculture enterprises more than

120 were divided into a suitable number (say, D) of hamlet-groups

(h.g)/sub-blocks(s.b) as indicated below:

POPULATION CRITERIA ENTERPRISE CRITERIA

Approximate Present Population of fsu’s

No. of Hamlet Groups/Sub-

Blocks Formed (D)

Approximate Present No. of Non-Agricultural

Enterprises in the fsu’s

No. of Hamlet Groups/Sub-

Blocks Formed (D)

0 -1200 1 0- 120 1

1201 – 1600 4 121 – 160 4

1601 – 2000 5 161 – 200 5

2001 – 2400 6 201– 240 6

2401 – 2800 7 241 – 280 7

And so on

At the outset, the number of hamlet groups/sub-blocks (value of ‘D’) to be

formed was decided on the basis of higher value of ‘D’ among the two criteria.

FORMATION OF SEGMENTS; SELECTION OF HAMLET GROUPS/

SUB-BLOCKS

The procedure for the formation of segments 9,1and 2 is detailed below:-

Formation of segment 9 within FSU:

After determining the boundaries of the sample FSU, all big non-agricultural

enterprises having 200 or more workers in the entire FSU and having operated at least

8

one day during last 365 days preceding the day of survey (hereinafter to be called as big

enterprise or brevity) were listed. All the listed big enterprises constituted segment 9 of

the selected FSU. All big enterprises under coverage listed in segment 9 were surveyed

separately in addition to required number of smaller enterprises under coverage in the

other segments of the selected FSU as per normal procedure.

Formation of segments 1 and 2:

After formation of hg/sb in the large FSUs, three hg’s/sb’s were selected for

survey according to the procedure given below:

Case I: For FSUs belonging to sub-strata 1 to 9: The hg/sb having maximum

number of establishments or OAEs belonging to the sub-stratum specific activity (e.g.

storage & warehousing activity for sub-stratum 1, hotel activity for sub-stratum 2 and so

on) in the FSU was selected with certainty (i.e. with probability 1) and designated as

segment 1. If in a particular FSU the sub-stratum specific establishments/OAEs were not

available, then formation of segment I was decided on the basis of maximum number of

establishments or OAEs belonging to activities specified in sequential order of other sub-

strata available in the Fsu under consideration, then segment I was formed on the basis of

these units. But if establishments/OAEs of the activity were also not available, then

those belonging to the specific activity of the next higher numbered sub-strata was

considered and so on till sub-stratum 9 is reached. If sub-stratum 9 specific activity was

also not available, then the exercise was done with sub-stratum 1, sub-stratum 2 and so

on. If no establishments/OAEs belonging to any of the activities to 9 under survey

coverage was available in the FSU, then hg/sb with maximum percentage share of

population was selected with certainty and marked as segment 1 .

Case II: For FSUs belonging to sub-strata 10 & 11: The hg/sb having maximum

number of enterprises was selected with certainty and designated as segment 1. If no

establishment/OAE belonging to any of the activities under survey coverage was

available in the FSU, then hg/sb with maximum percentage share of population was

selected for survey with certainty and marked as segment 1.

Two more hg’s/sb’s were to be selected for survey from the remaining (D–1)

hg’s/sb’s of the sample FSU with equal probability following the method of circular

systematic sampling. These two hg’s/sb’s together constituted segment 2. However,

9

FSUs not requiring hg/sb formation was identified as segment 1 for the purpose of

processing.

However, segment 1 excluded enterprises belonging to segment 9. Formation of

segment 9 was altogether different from that of segments 1 and 2.

SAMPLING OF ENTERPRISE / HOUSEHOLDS

Selection of enterprises;

Enterprises which operated for at least 30 days (15 days in case of seasonal

enterprises) during the last 365 days were considered for sampling and selection was

done from each combination with SRSWOR .

ESTIMATION PROCEDURE

NNOOTTAATTIIOONNSS::

The following notations were used in the formulae for estimation.

s = subscript for s-th stratum ( s = 9 for special study and s # 9 for general strata ).

t = subscript for t-th stratum of a general stratum ( t = 1, 2,...,11)

m = subscript for sub-sample ( m = 1, 2 )

i = subscript for i–th sample village/block (FSU).

u = subscript for a segment ( u = 1, 2 or 9 )

j = subscript for j-th Broad activity group ( BAG) ( j = 1, 2, ….9 )

k = subscript for k-th enterprise type ( k = 1, 2 )

l = subscript for l-th sample enterprise under a particular BAG X enterprise type for Sch

2.345 and l-th sample household for Sch 1.0

D = total number of hamlet-groups/sub-blocks formed in a sample FSU.

N = total number of FSUs in special stratum/stratum/sub-stratum

Z = total size of a general stratum /stratum/sub-stratum

z = FSU size used for selection.

10

n’= number of sample village/blocks allotted for a particular sub-sample.

n = number of sample FSUs surveyed including uninhabited and zero cases (used for

tabulation) for a particular sub- sample.

=inclusion probability for the sample FSUs of sub sample 1

=inclusion probability for the sample FSUs of sub sample 2 given sub sample1

E = total number of enterprises listed for a particular BAG x enterprise type in a segment

of a sample FSU.

e = total number of enterprises surveyed for a particular BAG x enterprise type in a

segment of a sample FSU.

0/1 = subscript for hamlet-group/sub-block number (‘0, or ‘1, as the case may be)

x,y = observed value of characteristics x,y under estimation.

Yˆ = estimate of population total X,Y for the characteristics x,y.

FFOORRMMUULLAAEE FFOORR EESSTTIIMMAATTIIOONN

For Schedule 2345 (For both Rural & Urban):

a) Estimation formula for stratum 9:

For an enterprise selected in a particular BAG X Enterprise type:

b) Estimation formulae for general strata:

(i) For sub-stratum 1 to 10:

For an enterprise selected in a particular BAG X Enterprise type:

1) For sub-sample 1:

,(m= 1)

∑ ∑∑∑= =

∗

==

×++=

N

i lli

i

ii

lli

i

iE

lli

iii ey

eED

ey

eEyY

1 12

11

1

1

19

2

2

219

ˆ

∑ ∑∑∑= =

∗

==

×++=

m

i lli

i

ii

lli

i

iE

lli

mim

n ey

eED

ey

eEyY

iii

1 12

2

2

11

1

1

19

2191ˆπ

11

2)

, (m=2)

where

(m=1)

and

, (m=2)

⌧⌧⌧

BAYm +=ˆ

∑ ∑∑∑= =

∗

==

×++=

Nm

i lli

i

ii

lli

i

iE

lli

iii ey

eED

ey

eEyA

1 12

11

1

1

19

2

2

219

∑ ∑∑∑= =

∗

==

×++=

m

i lli

i

ii

lli

i

iE

lli

mim

n ey

eED

ey

eEyY

iii

1 1

22

2

1

11

1

1

9

2191ˆπ

SSEECCTTIIOONN TTHHRREEEE

CCOONNCCEEPPTTUUAALL FFRRAAMMEEWWOORRKK

12

SECTION THREE

CCOONNCCEEPPTTUUAALL FFRRAAMMEEWWOORRKK

The concepts and definitions adopted during the NSS 57th round are explained in this section.

Reference Period : Last month was used as the reference period for collecting most of the

data, information on receipts and expenses as well as employment, emoluments, rent, interest

and value added for the enterprises were collected for the last month only. Last month

referred to the last 30 days (preceding the date of survey) for perennial and casual enterprises

irrespective of the number of days of operation. For seasonal enterprises also, last month

referred to the last 30 days (preceding the date of survey), if they worked continuously for

the last 30 days or more (including scheduled holidays) in the current season. Only for

seasonal enterprises, which worked for less than 30 days in the current season, last month

referred to an average month in the last working season. If some enterprise was unable to

give information for the last 30 days and was able to give information for the last 30 days and

was able to give information for the last calendar month, figures for the same are taken. For

enterprises which provided information from their books of accounts but were not able to

provide information for the last month/last calendar month, average monthly values of the

last accounting year were collected. In case of items "rent payable" and “interest payable”,

the monthly average based on yearly values were collected. For some of the items like value

of fixed assets, amount of loan outstanding, etc., the reference period was `as on the date of

survey'. For other items like net additions to fixed assets, number of months operated,

number of other economic activities pursued etc., the reference period was the `last 365 days

preceding the date of survey'.

Enterprise: An enterprise is an undertaking engaged in production and/or distribution of goods

and/or services not for the sole purpose of own consumption. The workers in an enterprise may

consist of members of the household or hired workers or both. The activity of the enterprise

13

may be carried out at one or more than one distinct location. The activity of the enterprise may

also be carried out only for a part of the year but on a fairly regular basis; i.e. it is in operation

for the major part of the season/year. An enterprise may be owned or operated by a single

household or by several households jointly (on a partnership basis) or by an institutional body or

by government.

In case where more than one entrepreneurial activity is carried on by the same person or

by the same household but separate accounts are kept for each of these activities, they were

treated as separate enterprise. However, in case where the activities cannot be distinguished

from one another, then only one enterprise pertaining to the major activity was recorded and all

items of information of all other minor activities were clubbed with that of major activity.

Unorganized Enterprise: The unorganized sector comprised the following types of

enterprises:

(i) All the enterprises except units registered under Section 2m(i) and 2 m(ii) of the

Factories Act, 1948 and Bidi and Cigar Workers (condition of employment)Act,

1966.

(ii) All enterprises except those run by Government (Central, State, local bodies)/Public

Sector Enterprises.

Own Account Enterprise: An own account enterprise (OAE) is an enterprise which is run

without any hired worker employed on fairly regular basis. If such an enterprise is engaged in

service sector activities, it is termed as own-account enterprise.

Establishment: An establishment is an enterprise engaged in economic activities with the

assistance of at least one hired worker on a fairly regular basis.

14

Fairly Regular Basis: The term “fairly regular basis” means the major part of the time when

operation(s) of an enterprise are carried out during a reference period.

Household Enterprise : A household enterprise was one which was run by one or more

members of a household or run jointly by two or more households on partnership basis

irrespective of whether the enterprise was located in the premises of the household(s) or not.

In other words, all proprietary and partnership enterprises were household enterprises.

Non-household Enterprise : Non-household enterprises were those which were institutional

i.e. owned and run by the public sector (Central or State Government, local self-government,

local bodies, government undertakings, etc. ) corporate sector, co-operative societies, other

types of societies, institutions, associations, trusts, etc.

Perennial/Seasonal Enterprise: An enterprise which runs more or less regularly throughout

the year, is termed as perennial enterprise and the enterprise which runs in a particular season

only is termed as seasonal enterprise. In case of persons/institutions engaged in different

seasonal enterprises in different parts of the year, not more than two such major enterprises

were taken into account during enumeration.

Enterprise With Premises And Without Premises: Enterprise operations in census house (or

in front of a census house), was classified as with premises and on the other hand if the

entrepreneurial activity is undertaken outside the census house (and cannot be linked to any

census house) or by moving, it is termed as without premises.

Non-profit Institutions (NPIs) : Non-profit institutions are legal or social entities created

for the purpose of producing goods and services whose status does not permit them to be a

source of income, profit or other financial gain for the units that establish, control or finance

them. In practice, their productive activities are bound to generate either surpluses or deficits

but any surpluses they happen to make cannot be appropriated by other institutional units.

The articles of association by which they are established are drawn up in such a way that the

15

institutional units which control or manage them are not entitled to a share in any profits or

the other income which they receive. For this reason, they are frequently exempted from

various kinds of taxes. The objectives of NPIs created by other institutional units - whether

persons, corporations, or government - are varied. For example, NPIs may be created to

provide services for the benefit of the persons or corporations who control or finance them;

or they may be created for chargeable, philanthropic or welfare reasons to provide goods or

services to other persons in need; or they may be intended to provide health or education

services for a fee, but not for profit; or they may be intended to promote the interest of

pressure groups in business or politics;' etc. Although they may provide services to groups

of persons or institutional units, they are, by convention, deemed to produce only individual

services and not collective service.

Co-Operative Enterprise: All those enterprises registered under the Act of Co- operative

Societies fall under this category.

Government Enterprise: All enterprises which are owned by Centre/State Government

including Public sector undertaking, Local Bodies are considered as Government Enterprises.

Universities, Educational Bodies and such similar Institutions, which are autonomous but are

getting grants from Central/State/Local Governments, are included under this category.

Workers: All persons, household and non-households, paid and unpaid, those who are

directly or indirectly associated with or incidental to manufacturing and/or repairing activities

of an enterprises are workers. Part-time workers are also taken as workers of the enterprises

so long as they are engaged on a fairly regular basis.

The workers of an enterprise have been divided into three different categories,

namely, (i)Working owner (ii) hired workers; and (iii) other workers.

Working Owner : The owner who personally worked in the proprietary or partnership

enterprises on a fairly regular basis was termed working owner. In fact, in most of the own-

account enterprises the owner himself/herself managed all activities of the enterprise without

the help of anyone (on a fairly regular basis). In the case of partnership enterprises, if only

one partner or some or all of the partners worked in the enterprise on a fairly regular basis

then he/she/they were considered as `working owners'.

16

Hired Worker : A hired worker was a person employed directly or through any agency on

payment of regular wage/salary in cash or kind. Apprentices, paid or unpaid, were treated as

hired workers. Paid household workers, servants and resident workers of the enterprise were

also considered as hired workers.

Other Worker/Helper : This includes all persons belonging to the household of the

proprietor or households of the partners who were working in or for the enterprise without

regular salary or wages. Persons working as exchange labourer in the enterprise without

salary or wages were also covered in this category. All unpaid household workers/helpers

who were associated with the activities of the enterprise during the reference month placed in

this category.

Mixed Activity : There were enterprises, which carried out a number of activities

simultaneously. If the accounts were not separable then the data pertained to the enterprise

as a whole was collected and the enterprise was classified as having mixed activities and the

activities of such enterprises are mixture of NIC's. The appropriate NIC in such cases was

determined on the basis of major activity. Major activity refers to the activity, which yielded

maximum income/turnover/employment. The above criteria was applied in the given order,

i.e. income first, then turnover and then employment, to determine the major activity. The

activities may be mixed at any level of NIC, but for the present survey an enterprise was

considered to have mixed activity if it had multiple (at least two) activities at 2-digit level of

NIC 1998 during the last 365 days.

Hotels : A hotel was an enterprise that provides lodging services with or without

arrangements for meals, other prepared food and refreshments. Dharamshala type lodging

places, private guest/rest houses, mess, and hostels attached to educational institutions,

students homes, hostels for working girls, tourist lodges, etc. were also covered under hotels.

Hotel activities have been classified under NIC group 551. All hotels were covered

in the survey provided they were run by private organizations. Similar facilities provided

through workers employed exclusively for these specific activities by organization like

YMCA, Ramkrishna Mission etc., and also by other membership organizations like Lions

17

Club, Rotary Club etc., were also covered under hotels. However, similar facilities if

provided by Govt. /PSU/local bodies/Statutory bodies (e.g. ISI, IIT, Universities, etc.) were

excluded from the purview of this survey.

Restaurants : A restaurant was one which generally provided eating and drinking services

where prepared meals, food, refreshments and other snacks were sold for immediate

consumption without any provision for lodging. Such establishments are variously known as

restaurants, cafes, cafeterias, snack bars, lunch counters, refreshment stands, milk bars,

canteens, etc. Bars and other drinking places were also treated as restaurants.

Restaurants are classified under NIC group 552. For the purpose of survey, canteens

located in offices, factories, etc., were treated as restaurants if they were operated by private

contractors. But departmental canteens run by government were excluded from the purview

of this survey.

Storage & Warehousing : The operation of storage and warehouses on hire to the farm

producer, dealer or trader, processor and manufacturing enterprises, including the general

public, as an independent business was termed as storage and warehousing enterprise.

Storage and warehousing services in respect of grains, other food articles, oilseeds and other

agricultural facilities on hire to other enterprises for potato, fruits, dairy products, fish and

other food products and also refrigerated food locker on rental services chiefly delivered to

individual households were included. While, storage of all manufactured products including

textiles, machine tools apparatus and equipment were included, farm produce stored by the

owner of the farm in his own godown or a dealer or a manufacturer storing his commodities

in his own godown or warehouse were excluded.

Storage and Warehousing activities fall under NIC class 6302. In the present survey,

establishments of Central Warehousing Corporation, State Warehousing Corporations and

the warehouses of the Central and State Governments were not included. Lockers in

commercial banks and in other type of enterprises for safe storage of precious belongings

were also excluded.

18

Transport : Transport was defined as an activity that carried passengers and /or goods from

one place to another as a business proposition. Supporting services incidental to transport

such as packing, freighting, travel agency, etc. were included under transport enterprise.

Mechanized road transport classified under NIC class 6021 and sub-classes 60221

and 60231, meant passenger transport by bus (including tramways) passenger transport by

other motor vehicles, freight transport by motor vehicles or any other road transport by

mechanized vehicle to qualify the activity as mechanized road transport.

Other transport and related activities mean transport of passengers and/or goods in

land, other than by mechanized road transport. Activity of travel agency and tour operators,

activities of other transport agency, supporting services incidental to transport such as

packing, freighting, travel agency etc., were also covered under other transport. The

following activities were also covered : (i) hackney carriages, carriage by bullock-

carts/ekka/tonga etc. (ii) transport by animals like horses, elephants, mules, camels, etc. , (iii)

transport by man including rickshaw-pullers, cart-operators, etc. (iv) all kinds of water

transport, (v) supporting services to land transport like operation of highway bridges, toll

roads, parking lots, etc. and (vi) supporting services to water transport like operation and

maintenance of piers, docks, light house, loading and discharging vessels, etc. A household

renting out transport vehicles to others and not operating directly with hired or household

labour to render service to others was not considered as having transport enterprise.

Transport via pipeline and air transport were beyond the coverage of this survey. Thus, the

activities covered in this survey fall under NIC codes 601, 60222, 60232, 61, 6301, 6303,

6304 and 6309.

Communication : All enterprises that provided communication services were

communication enterprises. This included courier services, ISD/STD/PCO booths, Voice

Mail Services through computer networking, Video/fax services, phone plus services, voiced

and non-voiced leased circuits, telex/FAX/data services through computer network, radio

paging, audio services and activity of cable operators etc.

Communication, falling under NIC group 64, not owned by government, Public

Sector undertakings and local bodies were covered in this survey. However, activities of the

19

cellular service operators were outside the coverage of this survey, although their agencies

were covered.

Real estate, Renting and Business Activities : Real estate activities included activities like

: (i) purchase, sale letting and operating of real estate i.e. residential/non-residential building,

(ii) developing and sub-dividing real estate into lots, (iii) lessors of real property and (iv)

real estate agents, brokers and managers engaged in renting, buying and selling, managing

and appraising real estate on contract or fee basis. Letting out of an accommodation was not

included except in case of real estate agents such a business. Renting of machinery and

equipment was covered. A household hiring out machinery and equipment or household

durables was also treated as an enterprise. All business activities classifiable under NIC

1998 codes 70 to 74 were covered in this survey.

Education : All educational institutions were covered under this category. Research and

scientific services rendered by institutions and laboratories were also covered provided they

satisfied the above criterion. These might be engaged in research in biological, physical and

social sciences. Meteorological institutes and medical research organisations were also

included. Management training institutes, computer training centres, nursing schools,

schools of music, drama, dance, fine arts, modelling, fashion designing, yoga and physical

education and general coaching centres (e.g. for various competitive examinations ) etc.,

were also covered under this activity.

In activities under education included in NIC group 80, all educational institutions not

recognized by Central/State/Local Govts. /autonomous bodies like AICTE, IIT, University

etc. were covered. Similar facilities provided through workers employed exclusively for

these specific activities by organisations like YMCA, Ramkrishna Mission etc. and also by

other membership organisations like Lions Club, Rotary Club etc. were also covered under

education.

Health and Social Work : All enterprises engaged in health and medical services came

under this activity, irrespective of the system of medicine. All dispensaries, clinics and

consultation chambers run by doctors were included here. The activity also included

activities of veterinary services including bird hospitals. For an employed doctor and para-

20

medical person (such as midwife, dai, etc.) engaging in private practice, his/her private

practice alone was considered as an enterprise. All kinds of health clubs were included in

this activity.

All health and social work activities falling under NIC group 85, other than those

owned by government public sector undertakings, local bodies were under the purview of the

present survey. Similar facilities provided through workers exclusively for these specific

activities by organizations like YMCA, Ramkrishna Mission, etc. and also by other

membership organizations like Lion Club, Rotary Club, etc. were covered under health and

social work.

Other Community, social and Personal Services : This included the activities like sewage

and refuse disposal, other service activities like washing and cleaning of textile products,

hairdressing, beauty parlours, funeral and related activities, massage saloons, sauna baths,

activities of shoe shiners, porters, car part agents, etc.; activities such as those of portrait and

commercial photographic studios, etc. Palmists and astrologers were also included here.

The coverage of other community, social and personal service activities, covered

under NIC groups 90 to 93, excluded the activities of trade union, religious organizations,

political organizations and other membership organizations. It may be noted that individuals

serving as housemaids, cooks, gardeners, governesses, babysitters, chowkidars, night

watchmen, etc. were, in general, outside the coverage of the present survey. However, if

such activities were provided by some agencies against prescribed fees, those agencies were

treated as enterprises under respective NIC code. For example, an agency which supplies

babysitters or nurses or night watchmen with some profit margin, was covered under this

activity.

Gross Value Added: Value added represents that part of production which is the actual

contribution of an enterprise to the economy. Value added is calculated by deducting total

value of operating expenditure (including distributive expenditure) from the total value of

receipts during a reference period.

21

Fixed Assets: Fixed assets mean assets of an enterprise in the form of land, building and

other construction, plant and machinery, transport equipment, tools and other fixed assets

(new or used) that have a normal economic life of more than one year from the date of

acquisition i.e., through outright purchase/ hire purchase / loan/ mortgage/ and / or

construction, irrespective of their use at the time of survey. Market value of the fixed assets

owned by the enterprises as on last day of reference year has been considered for the purpose

of this report. The hired component of fixed assets is present market value of the assets used

by an enterprise but not owned by it.

⌧⌧⌧

SSEECCTTIIOONN FFOOUURR

SSUUMMMMAARRYY FFIINNDDIINNGGSS

22

SECTION FOUR

SSUUMMMMAARRYY FFIINNDDIINNGGSS

This section is devoted to the analysis of the main features of the un-organised service

sector enterprises in Delhi. These results are based on 5761 number of sample enterprises

surveyed during 2000-2001. Out of total sample, 3673 were own-account enterprises and 2088

were establishments. The detailed statement containing sampled enterprises and workers is in

section five. This sample survey was conducted on the basis of the frame available from the

fourth economic census conducted during 1998. Main focus of analysis is on three important

aspects namely physical features such as number of enterprises & employment, financial

aspects like value added, capital structure, and other financial indicators. The other operational

characteristics like type of ownership, nature of operation, problems faced by this sector, status

of growth of this sector and other related aspects. Comparison was also made with the central

sample results in respect of key parameters.

4.1. ESTIMATED NUMBER OF ENTERPRISES

The total numbers of enterprises operating in NCT of Delhi and falling with-in the

purview of unorganised service sector covered by the 57th NSS round was estimated as

244873. Out of them 11467 (4.68%) were in rural areas while 233406 (95.32%) were operating

in urban areas.

Statement 4.1.1: Number of Enterprises

Sector Own Account Enterprises Establishments All Percentage

To Total

RURAL 9508 1959 11467 4.68

URBAN 160069 73337 233406 95.32

DELHI 169577 75296 244873 100.00

Percentage to Total 69.25 30.75 100.00

23

Further distribution of these enterprises brought to light that 169577 (69.25%) were

household enterprises (OAE) operating without any hired labour and 75296 (30.75%) were

establishments.

Distribution of these

enterprises by sector, enterprise type

and major activity group (NIC 1998)

wise is presented in statements 4.1.2,

4.1.3, 4.1.4 for Delhi, rural and urban

respectively. In Delhi among all

enterprises, community, social and

personal service activities including

other transport accounted for 22.57%

followed by Real estate, Renting and

Business activities with 14.38% share

while Restaurants contributed 14.06%. Thus tabulation category H2, K and O taken together

contributed for more than 50 percent of the total number of enterprises.

Statement 4.1.2: Distribution of Enterprises by Tabulation Category (Delhi)

Number of Enterprises Tabulation Category

NIC Code 1998 Description

OAE ESTT Total % Rank

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 H 1 551 Hotels 75 1024 1099 0.45 9 H 2 552 Restaurants 19413 15006 34419 14.06 3

Sub-Total 19488 16030 35518 14.51I 1 6302 Storage and Warehousing 0 30 30 0.01 10

I 2 6021, 60221, 60231

Mechanized road transport 27122 1010 28132 11.49 5

I 3

601,60222,60232,61, 6301,6303, 6304,6309

Other Transport & Related Activities 28543 2108 30651 12.52 4

I 4 64 Communication 10521 5725 16246 6.63 8

Sub-Total 66186 8873 75059 30.65

K 70-74 Real estate, Renting and Business activities 14616 20591 35207 14.38 2

M 80 Education 12578 9755 22333 9.12 6 N 85 Health and social work 13247 8232 21479 8.77 7

O 90, 911, 9191, 92, 93

Other community, social and personal service activities & other transport

43462 11815 55277 22.57 1

TOTAL 169577 75296 244873 Percentage to Total 69.25 30.75 100.00

Distribution of Enterprises by Type of Enterprise & Sector

9508

1600

69

1695

77

1959

7333

7

7529

6

020000400006000080000

100000120000140000160000180000

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Num

ber o

f Ent

erpr

ises

Own Account Enterprises Establishments

24

The other major activity that

have a sizeable stake in the total

number of enterprises include

transport and education. Transport

enterprises in all forms singularly

account for 24.01% and in case of

education it was 9.12%. The share of

communication and Health Sector

enterprises was in the order of 6.63%

and 8.77%. The enterprise in

warehousing & Storage was making

negligible contribution of less than

one percent. Tabulation category wise ranking of enterprises (Delhi) is presented in the above

graph.

Statement 4.1.3: Distribution of Enterprises by Tabulation Category (Rural)

Number of Enterprises Tab. Cat. NIC Code 1998 Description


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 H1 551 Hotels 0 0 0 0.00 10 H2 552 Restaurants 1381 283 1664 14.51 3

Sub-Total 1381 283 1664 14.51 I1 6302 Storage and Warehousing 0 3 3 0.03 9

I2 6021, 60221, 60231 Mechanized road transport 1163 17 1180 10.29 6

I3 601,60222,60232,61, 6301,6303, 6304,6309


I4 64 Communication 719 132 851 7.42 7 Sub-Total 3519 196 3715 32.40



O 90, 911, 9191, 92, 93


869 766 1635 14.26 4

TOTAL 9508 1959 11467 100.00 Percentage to Total 82.92 17.08 100.00

Distribution of Enterprises by Tabulation category (Delhi)

5527

7

3520

7

3441

9

3065

1

2813

2

2233

3

2147

9

1624

6

1099

30

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

O K H2 I3 I2 M N I4 H1 I1

Tabulation Category

Num

ber

of E

nter

pris

es

25

In the rural areas of Delhi, enterprises of Health & Social work with 21.73% share occupied

first position. This is followed by Other transport and related activities (14.66%), Restaurants

(14.51%) and Community, Social & Personnel Services etc (14.26%) On the contrary in

Urban areas of Delhi the scenario is more or less same as that of the position at the State level

for obvious reasons.

Statement 4.1.4: Distribution of Enterprises by Tabulation Category (Urban)

Number of Enterprises Tabulation

Category NIC Code 1998 Description



Sub-Total 18107 15747 33854 14.50I1 6302 Storage and Warehousing 0 27 27 0.01 10

I2 6021, 60221, 60231


I3 601,60222,60232,61, 6301,6303, 6304,6309





O 90, 911, 9191, 92, 93


42593 11049 53642 22.98 1


Distribution of Enterprises by Tabulation category (Rural)

0

3

624

851

1180

1337

1635

1664

1681

2492

0 1000 2000 3000

H1

M

I2

O

I3

Tabu

latio

n C

ateg

ory

Number of Enterprises

Distribution of Enterprises by Tabulation category (Urban)

27

1099

15395

18987

21709

26952

28970

32755

33870

53642

0 20000 40000 60000

I1

I4

M

I3

KTa

bula

tion

Cat

egor

y

Number of Enterprises

26

Analysing the enterprises by

their type revealed that among the own

account unorganised service sector

enterprises, tabulation category ‘I’

covering storage & warehousing,

transport & other related activities and

communication alone accounted for

39.03% whereas Tabulation Category

‘O’ consisting enterprises in the field of

community, social & personal service

activities and other transport

contributed 25.63%in the total. Further

hotel and restaurants (TC – ‘H’) had a share of 11.49%, Real estate, Renting and Business

activities (TC – ‘K’)8.62% while Education (TC – ‘M’)and Health (TC – ‘N’) Sector

accounted for more than 7% each in the total number of own-account enterprises.

Similarly, break-up of

enterprises of establishment

category indicated that tabulation

category ‘K’ operating in the field

of Real Estate, Renting and

Business activities topped the

table with 27.35% (i.e. more than

1/4th share) Share. Hotels &

Restaurants of tabulation category

‘H’ followed the suit with 21.29%

and enterprises under the

tabulation ‘O’ viz. Communities,

Social, Personal Services etc. had

cornered a share of 15.69% in the

total. Further Tabulation Category ‘ M, I and N’ accounted for 12.96%, 11.78% and 10.93%

ratio respectively.

Distribution of Own Account Enterprises by Tabulation Category

I39.03%

K8.62%

M7.42%

N7.81%

O25.63%

H11.49%

Distribution of Establishments by Tabulation Category

I11.78%K

27.35%

M12.96%

N10.93% O

15.69%

H21.29%

27

4.1.5: State/UT wise Distribution of Enterprises

Enterprises S.No. State/UT OAE ESTT. All %age Rank

1 Jammu & Kashmir 85084 23950 109034 0.75 202 Himachal Pradesh 59466 20436 79902 0.55 213 Punjab 288450 70214 358664 2.48 144 Chandigarh 11757 6306 18063 0.12 265 Uttranchal 124446 26802 151248 1.05 186 Haryana 174664 49871 224535 1.55 177 Delhi 169577 75296 244873 1.69 168 Rajasthan 471148 94301 565449 3.91 119 Uttar Pradesh 2176785 311080 2487865 17.19 110 Bihar 1026225 155416 1181641 8.17 511 Sikkim 3873 3172 7045 0.05 2912 Arunachal Pradesh 763 656 1419 0.01 3413 Nagaland 9524 3498 13022 0.09 2814 Manipur 21249 3312 24561 0.17 2415 Mizoram 2979 2193 5172 0.04 3016 Tripura 37516 6723 44239 0.31 2217 Meghalaya 18978 8832 27810 0.19 2318 Assam 326954 63607 390561 2.70 1319 West Bengal 1391659 169474 1561133 10.79 220 Jharkhand 238294 38234 276528 1.91 1521 Orissa 544761 72476 617237 4.27 822 Chattisgarh 120996 29371 150367 1.04 1923 Madhya Pradesh 367925 90217 458142 3.17 1224 Gujarat 480396 119043 599439 4.14 1025 Daman & Diu 1299 829 2128 0.01 3326 D & N Haveli 1732 589 2321 0.02 3227 Maharashtra 897838 289995 1187833 8.21 428 Andhra Pradesh 1199160 144985 1344145 9.29 329 Karnataka 519545 156999 676544 4.68 730 Goa 9347 4808 14155 0.10 2731 Lakshadweep 577 165 742 0.01 3532 Kerala 462473 144328 606801 4.19 933 Tamil Nadu 829431 186099 1015530 7.02 634 Pondicherry 10895 8014 18909 0.13 2535 And.& Nic.Island 1593 870 2463 0.02 31

All India 12087359 2382161 14469520 100.00

Statement 4.1.5 provides State/UT wise comparison of Service Sector Enterprises by

Enterprises Type. At the All India level there were about 144.70 Lakh Enterprises operating

during 2000-2001. The States of Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal ranked 1st & 2nd with 17.19%

and 10.79% share respectively. Delhi with 1.7% share in the total number of Enterprises had

occupied 16th position among 35 States/UTs in the country.

28

4.2 ESTIMATED EMPLOYMENT

The total employment provided by the un-organised service sector enterprises covered

by the survey was about 5.92 lakhs. This includes hired and household, full-time and part-

time, skilled & un-skilled workers. Of the total employment 15885 persons (2.68%) were

employed in rural enterprises while 575909 persons (97.32%) in the enterprises operating in

urban Delhi .

Statement 4.2.1: Distribution of Estimated Employment.

Item Own Account Enterprises Establishments

All Percentage

To Total EMPLOYMENT RURAL 10664 5221 15885 2.68URBAN 209856 366053 575909 97.32DELHI 220520 371274 591794 100.00Percentage to Total 37.26 62.74 100.00 AVERAGE EMPLOYMENT RURAL 1.12 2.67 1.39 URBAN 1.31 4.99 2.47 DELHI 1.30 4.93 2.42

Further study revealed that about 2.21 lakh persons (37.26%) were employed in household

enterprises (OAE’s) and 3.71 lakh

persons (62.74%) were gainfully

employed in establishments.

Distribution of employment sector-

wise and enterprise type-wise is

presented in graph .

The average employment

per enterprise in rural areas was

1.39 persons and that of urban

areas was 2.47 persons. In Delhi

average employment of own

account enterprises stood at 1.3

persons and in establishments this

was as high as 4.93 persons.

Distribution of Employment by Type of Enterprise & Sector

10.66

366.05 371.27

220.52209.86

5.220

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Num

ber o

f Per

sons

('000

)

OAE ESTT.

29

Distribution of employment at NIC (National Industrial Classification 1998) and broad

tabulation category wise is presented in statement 4.2.2. Enterprises of NIC 98 (Tabulation

category ‘O’) dealing with Community/Social/Personal services etc. accounted for 21.68 % of

the total employment provided by this Sector and thereby occupied first rank.

Statement 4.2.2: Distribution of Employment by Tabulation Category (Delhi)

Employment Tabulation Category

NIC Code 1998 Description




I2 6021, 60221, 60231


I3

601,60222,60232,61, 6301,6303, 6304,6309


I4 64 Communication 12738 31429 44167 7.46 6

Sub-Total 69238 45724 114962 19.43



O 90, 911, 9191, 92, 93


78119 50203 128322 21.68 1


Average Employment By Type of Enterprise & Sector

4.99 4.93

1.12 1.301.31

2.67

1.39

2.47 2.42

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Num

ber o

f Per

sons

OAE ESTT. COMBINED

30

This is followed by enterprises of Real estate, renting and business activities

(Tabulation Category ‘K’) which were found to be providing employment to the extent of

17.16 % in the total. Enterprises in the field of Restaurants (Tabulation Category ‘H2’ and

NIC 552) by contributing 15.63 % of the total employment occupied 3rd position. Thus

enterprises in Tabulation Category ‘H2’, ‘K’ & ‘O’ taken together provide employment for

more than 50 % of the persons employed in this Sector. It is observed that employment also

followed same pattern as that of enterprises when it comes to the share of top three Service

Sector activities in the total.

Distribution of Employment by Tabulation category (Delhi)

1283

22

1015

32

9249

0

8365

9

6312

4

4416

7

3878

3

3194

8

7705

64

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

O K H2 M N I4 I3 I2 H1 I1

Tabulation Category

Num

ber o

f Per

sons

31

Statement 4.2.3: Distribution of Employment by Tabulation Category (Rural)

Employment Tab.Cat. NIC Code 1998 Description





I3 601,60222,60232,61, 6301,6303, 6304,6309





O 90, 911, 9191, 92, 93


1546 1542 3088 19.44 1


Statement 4.2.4: Distribution of Employment by Tabulation Category (Urban)

Employment Tab Cat. NIC Code 1998 Description



Sub-Total 25060 72653 97713 16.97 I1 6302 Storage and Warehousing 0 54 54 0.01 10


I3 601,60222,60232,61, 6301,6303, 6304,6309





O 90, 911, 9191, 92, 93


76573 48661 125234 21.75 1


32

Statement 4.2.5: State/UT wise Distribution of Employment Employment S.No. State/UT

OAE ESTT. All %age Rank

1 Jammu & Kashmir 104672 85118 189790 0.72 202 Himachal Pradesh 71890 69478 141368 0.53 213 Punjab 331348 329719 661067 2.49 134 Chandigarh 14205 29839 44044 0.17 265 Uttranchal 136479 129681 266160 1.00 196 Haryana 209244 242474 451718 1.70 167 Delhi 220520 371274 591794 2.23 148 Rajasthan 619209 411200 1030409 3.88 119 Uttar Pradesh 2783559 1374364 4157923 15.67 110 Bihar 1325611 457092 1782703 6.72 611 Sikkim 6075 12702 18777 0.07 2912 Arunachal Pradesh 1164 2391 3555 0.01 3413 Nagaland 11483 14590 26073 0.10 2814 Manipur 28398 19735 48133 0.18 2515 Mizoram 4416 6580 10996 0.04 3016 Tripura 42952 17857 60809 0.23 2317 Meghalaya 29465 27126 56591 0.21 2418 Assam 351765 199618 551383 2.08 1519 West Bengal 1598973 725658 2324631 8.76 420 Jharkhand 284538 131328 415866 1.57 1721 Orissa 855511 298937 1154448 4.35 1022 Chattisgarh 168776 127524 296300 1.12 1823 Madhya Pradesh 488014 466635 954649 3.60 1224 Gujarat 582340 734619 1316959 4.96 825 Daman & Diu 1697 3827 5524 0.02 3226 D & N Haveli 2100 2185 4285 0.02 3327 Maharashtra 1200551 1404706 2605257 9.82 228 Andhra Pradesh 1823117 718121 2541238 9.57 329 Karnataka 710146 673126 1383272 5.21 730 Goa 13839 21675 35514 0.13 2731 Lakshadweep 813 485 1298 0.00 3532 Kerala 579637 631938 1211575 4.56 933 Tamil Nadu 1220779 909031 2129810 8.02 534 Pondicherry 17781 44188 61969 0.23 2235 And.& Nic.Island 2462 3512 5974 0.02 31

All India 15843529 10698333 26541862 100.00

Statement 4.2.5 provides State/UT wise comparison of employment in Service Sector

Enterprises by Enterprises Type. At the All India level there were about 265.42 Lakh persons

working in this Sector during 2000-2001. The States of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and

33

Andhra Pradesh ranked 1st, 2nd and 3rd position with 15.67%, 9.82 % and 9.57% share

respectively. Delhi with 2.23% share in the total employment had secured 14th position

among 35 States/UTs in the country.

TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT

Statement 4.2.6 gives two important features namely, duration of employment and

gender wise distribution of employment in Delhi. A person is said to be employed on part-time

basis if he/she works for less than or equal to

half of normal working hours of the

enterprise on a fairly regular basis and on the

contrary if a person works for more than half

of the working hours he/she can be classified

as employed on full-time basis . The survey

revealed that out of the total only 1.91% were

employed on part-time basis. Further, part-

time employment was about 1.53% in own-

account enterprises as against 2.14% in

establishments. The incidence of part-time

employment among males was about 1.72%

where as it was about 2.98% among females.

Statement 4.2.6: Features of Employment in Delhi.

OAE ESTT COMBINED S.NO.

ITEM Full Time

Part Time Total Full

Time Part Time Total Full

Time Part Time Total

A Rural Male 10483 0 10483 4998 2 5000 15481 2 15483 Female 181 0 181 221 0 221 402 0 402 Sub-Total 10664 0 10664 5219 2 5221 15883 2 15885B Urban Male 183977 1805 185782 292031 6771 298802 476008 8576 484584 Female 22511 1563 24074 66080 1171 67251 88591 2734 91325 Sub-Total 206488 3368 209856 358111 7942 366053 564599 11310 575909C Delhi Male 194460 1805 196265 297029 6773 303802 491489 8578 500067 Female 22692 1563 24255 66301 1171 67472 88993 2734 91727 Total 217152 3368 220520 363330 7944 371274 580482 11312 591794 Percentage 98.47 1.53 100.00 97.86 2.14 100.00 98.09 1.91 100.00

Nature of Employment

Part Time1.91%

Full Time

98.09%

34

Sex-wise distribution of employment in this sector revealed that out of the total,

15.50% were females. The participation of females in the house hold enterprises was found to

be less than of establishments as their share was to the tune of 10.99% in OAEs as against

18.17% in the case of later

It is interesting to observe that of the total full time working females 25.5% were

employed in household enterprises while the remaining 74.5% were working in establishments.

On the other hand, in case of part time working females about 57.17% were working in

household enterprises and the remaining 42.83% were working in establishments. In case of

full time working males incidence was more in establishments with 96.04% share in the

respective category while only 3.96% were employed in household enterprises. On the other

hand, in case of part time working males in household enterprises and establishments was

21.04% and 78.96% respectively.

Distribution of Employment by Sex

Male84.50%

Female15.50%

35

Statement 4.2.7: Distribution of Hired workers in Delhi Hired Worker

Male Female All Tabula

tion Categ

ory Skilled Unskilled Total Skilled Unski

lled Total Skilled Unskilled Total

%age of

Skilled to Total

1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 H1 2858 3454 6312 104 5 109 2962 3459 6421 46.13H2 21169 24371 45540 15 0 15 21184 24371 45555 46.50I1 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 100.00I2 1960 1019 2979 41 19 60 2001 1038 3039 65.84I3 5276 1349 6625 272 62 334 5548 1411 6959 79.72I4 16510 6697 23207 462 152 614 16972 6849 23821 71.25K 34012 20794 54806 3497 498 3995 37509 21292 58801 63.79M 12652 4109 16761 36237 6191 42428 48889 10300 59189 82.60N 26985 6086 33071 4915 1029 5944 31900 7115 39015 81.76O 24184 6520 30704 3813 1014 4827 27997 7534 35531 78.80Total 145610 74399 220009 49356 8970 58326 194966 83369 278335 70.05% age 66.18 33.82 100.00 84.62 15.38 100.00 70.05 29.95 100.00

A worker is categorized as skilled if he/she has the proficiency in a given field acquired

through formal or informal type of education. Skill was considered irrespective of general or

technical level of education. All persons possessing the skills such as typing, stenography,

computer programming, data entry, teaching, practice of medicine, nursing, painting,

decoration, beautician, barber, vehicle driver etc. have been considered as skilled for the

purpose of this survey.

The outcome of the survey provided a concrete evidence that this sector is

Composition of Females Employed Part Time by Enterprise Type

ESTT42.83%

OAE57.17%

36

dominated by skilled labour in the hired

category across all type of activities

covered under the survey. Distribution

of hired workers according to skill is

presented in statement 4.2.7. Out of the

total hired workers more than 70%

were found to be skilled. Sex wise

breakup of skilled hired workers

indicated that 25.32% were females and

74.68% males. Among the male hired

workers 66.18% were skilled and 33.82 unskilled. Similarly in case of females 15.38% were

unskilled and 84.62% skilled labour. Among the different tabulation categories of enterprises

(with the exception of I1) TC’M’ concerning education had 82.6% of the hired employment in

the skilled category.

Statement 4.2.8: Distribution of Employment by status in Delhi

Tabulation Category

Working Owner Hired Worker Other Worker Total

Percentage of Working

Owner to Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 H1 1198 6421 86 7705 15.55 H2 38137 45555 8799 92491 41.23 I1 57 4 3 64 89.06 I2 28430 3039 478 31947 88.99 I3 31381 6959 443 38783 80.91 I4 17725 23821 2621 44167 40.13 K 38691 58801 4040 101532 38.11 M 21936 59189 2534 83659 26.22 N 22050 39015 2060 63125 34.93 O 83601 35531 9189 128321 65.15 Total 283206 278335 30253 591794 47.86 Percentage 47.86 47.03 5.11 100.00

Enterprises in the health sector were also equipped with 81.76% skilled hired workers. Hotel

and Restaurant activities alone had skilled hired labour of less than 50% and going by the

nature of this activity the findings of this survey tallies with the ground reality in this respect.

Composition of Females Employed Full Time by Enterprise

Type

ESTT74.50%

OAE25.50%

37

The total employed persons in this sector can be further classified in terms of their

status namely working owner, hired worker and other worker. It is worthwhile to mention that

the category of working owner occurs only in proprietary and partnership type of enterprises.

Further hired workers may be taken to mean those employed on regular salary/wage basis. It

also includes paid and unpaid apprentice.

The survey revealed that out of the total persons employed 47.86% were working

owners, 47.03% hired workers and

the rest of 5.11% fall in the

category of other workers which

includes un-paid house hold

workers, helpers etc., Statement

4.2.9 provides gender wise breakup

of type of employment by status.

Accordingly, out of the total of

working owners 90.53% were male

and only 9.47 % were female. In

the same fashion among hired

workers to the extent of 79.04%

were male and 20.96% were

females. And in the case of ‘other

Type of Employment

Other Workers

5.11%

Hired Workers47.03%

Working Owners47.86%

Distribution of Type of Employment by Tabulation Category

393.

4

775.

9

386.

9

219.

4

220.

5

836

519.

8

338.

2

588

591.

9

390.

2

355.

3

88.8

5

35.4

5

40.4

25.3

4

20.6 91

.89

0100200300400500600700800900

H I K M N O

Tabulation Category

No.

of P

erso

ns ('

00)

Working Owner Hired Worker Other Worker

38

workers’ the gender wise composition is more or less same as the case with the hired workers.

Tabulation category wise position of hired workers indicated that Education sector

(TC’M’) was found to be employing highest number in this category namely 59189 persons.

Enterprises in the field of Real Estate,Renting and Business activities (TC ‘K’)employing

58801 hired workers was a close second in the order.

Statement 4.2.9: Distribution of Employment by sex and by type of Enterprise in Delhi

Item Working Owner Hired Worker Other Worker Total

1 2 3 4 5

NUMBER

OAE

Male 180453 0 15812 196265

Female 19350 0 4905 24255

Sub-Total 199803 0 20717 220520

ESTT

Male 75938 220009 7855 303802

Female 7465 58326 1681 67472

Sub-Total 83403 278335 9536 371274

COMBINED

Male 256391 220009 23667 500067

Female 26815 58326 6586 91727

Sub-Total 283206 278335 30253 591794

PERCENTAGE

Male 90.53 79.04 78.23 84.50

Female 9.47 20.96 21.77 15.50

Sub-Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Among the total male workers 51.27% were working owners, 44% hired workers and

the rest of 4.73% were falling in other workers class. Similarly, among the 91727 women

working in unorganised manufacturing enterprises in Delhi, 29.23% were working

owners,63.59% were Hired workers and remaining 7.18% were in the category ‘others’.

39

Delhi had an overall average employment of 2.4 persons per enterprise when compared

to the national average of 1.8 persons per enterprise. In respect of establishments the average

employment in Delhi was 4.9 persons per enterprise as against 4.5 persons at the All India

level and in case of OAEs Delhi with 1.3 persons was on par with the All India average.

Further, in the over all average employment Delhi had jointly shared the 5th position in

the All India along with Chandigarh (UT) and Andaman Nicobar Island (UT). Pondichery

with an over all average employment of 3.3 persons per enterprise had recorded the best

average in the country. In fact it is only state/UT that had recorded an average employment of

more than 3 persons per enterprise. Sikkim and Daman Diu managed second and third position

respectively. Arunachal Pradesh and Goa had achieved the same average employment of 2.5

person per enterprise and ranked fourth in the All India.

Distribution of Female Employment

Skilled53.81%

Un Skilled9.78%

Hired Worker63.59%

Working Owner29.23%

Other Worker7.18%

40

Statement 4.2.10: State-wise Average Employment by Enterprise Type.

S.No. State/UT OAE ESTT. All 1 Jammu & Kashmir 1.2 3.6 1.72 Himachal Pradesh 1.2 3.4 1.83 Punjab 1.1 4.7 1.84 Chandigarh 1.2 4.7 2.45 Uttranchal 1.1 4.8 1.86 Haryana 1.2 4.9 2.07 Delhi 1.3 4.9 2.48 Rajasthan 1.3 4.4 1.89 Uttar Pradesh 1.3 4.4 1.710 Bihar 1.3 2.9 1.511 Sikkim 1.6 4.0 2.712 Arunachal Pradesh 1.5 3.6 2.513 Nagaland 1.2 4.2 2.014 Manipur 1.3 6.0 2.015 Mizoram 1.5 3.0 2.116 Tripura 1.1 2.7 1.417 Meghalaya 1.6 3.1 2.018 Assam 1.1 3.1 1.419 West Bengal 1.1 4.3 1.520 Jharkhand 1.2 3.4 1.521 Orissa 1.6 4.1 1.922 Chattisgarh 1.4 4.3 2.023 Madhya Pradesh 1.3 5.2 2.124 Gujarat 1.2 6.2 2.225 Daman & Diu 1.3 4.6 2.626 D & N Haveli 1.2 3.7 1.827 Maharashtra 1.3 4.8 2.228 Andhra Pradesh 1.5 5.0 1.929 Karnataka 1.4 4.3 2.030 Goa 1.5 4.5 2.531 Lakshadweep 1.4 2.9 1.732 Kerala 1.3 4.4 2.033 Tamil Nadu 1.5 4.9 2.134 Pondicherry 1.6 5.5 3.335 And.& Nic.Island 1.5 4.0 2.4

All India 1.3 4.5 1.8

Note: Figures of Average Employment for states except Delhi pertains to Central Sample

41

4.3 FINANCIAL INDICATORS GROSS VALUE ADDED:

One of the prime objectives of the survey was to ascertain the Gross Value Added per

enterprise/worker to assess the significance of this sector to the economy in monetary terms.

More over Value added per worker also serves as an important indicator of productivity of

worker. Gross Value Added can be expressed in terms of Product and Factor approach.

According to product approach GVA is arrived by deducting operating expenses( including

distributive expenses) from total receipts. On the other hand factor approach involves clubbing

of factor incomes to arrive at the GVA during the survey the value of surplus earned by

entrepreneur was not collected for plausible reasons. It is so because enterprises in the

unorganised sector were found to be not maintaining books of accounts in majority of the

cases, hence collection of value of surplus verbally will lead to wild guess and in all

probability lead to over or under estimation. Therefore, analysis of GVA is limited to product

approach only.

Statement 4.3.1: Annual Gross Value Added Per Enterprise and Per Worker.

S.No ITEM OAE ESTABLISHMENTS ALL

A AMOUNT OF GROSS VALUE ADDED (IN RS.) 1 RURAL 415255848 140897328 556153176 2 URBAN 7929997092 28795857804 36725854896 3 DELHI 8345252940 28936755132 37282008072

B ENTERPRISES (NUMBERS) 1 RURAL 9508 1959 11467 2 URBAN 160069 73337 233406 3 DELHI 169577 75296 244873

C EMPLOYMENT (NUMBERS) 1 RURAL 10664 5221 15885 2 URBAN 209856 366053 575909 3 DELHI 220520 371274 591794

D GROSS VALUE ADDED/ENTERPRISE (IN RS.) 1 RURAL 43674 71923 48500 2 URBAN 49541 392651 157348 3 DELHI 49212 384307 152250

E VALUE ADDED/WORKER (IN RS.) 1 RURAL 38940 26987 35011 2 URBAN 37788 78666 63770 3 DELHI 37844 77939 62998

Statement 4.3.1 shows the Annual Gross Value added per enterprise/ worker by Product

approach in rupee terms by enterprise type. From this statement, it is evident that each

enterprise in the unorganised service sector was found to be averaging Rs. 1.52 lakhs as Gross

Value Added per annum. GVA of Household enterprises (OAE) was estimated at Rs. 0.49 lakh

42

as against Rs. 3.84 lakhs earned by establishments. It is worth while to observe that annual

GVA of an enterprise in urban areas is more than three times to that of the rural areas.

Accordingly VA per worker in this sector was estimated as Rs. 62998 per year. Value

added per worker in OAE’s was Rs. 37844 and that of establishments was Rs. 77939 per

annum. GVA per enterprise /worker is presented by enterprise type in graph, gives clear

conclusions about relative importance of each type of enterprises. The productivity of worker

expressed in terms of GVA per worker was relatively high in enterprises located in urban areas

(Rs. 63770) when compared to that of (Rs.35011) in rural areas.

Statement 4.3.2 gives more details about the various components leading to working of GVA

of unorganized service sector in actual monetary terms and also tabulation category wise. The

overall contribution of this sector was estimated as Rs. 372820 lakhs during the year 2001-

2002 in terms of gross value added.

Value Added Per Enterprise/Worker by Enterprise Type in Delhi

49.2

1

37.8

4

384.

31

77.9

4152.

25

63.0

0

050

100150200250300350400450

Per Enterprise Per Worker

Valu

e A

dded

in R

s.('0

00)

OAE ESTT COMBINED

43

In first instance, It may be observed from the statement 4.3.2 that wide variation exist in

between GVA of different tabulation categories both for enterprise and worker. This can

perhaps be due to scale of operation and inherent nature of activity. Enterprises in Hotel

activity (H1) aggregated the best average value added both for enterprise as well as worker. In

case of enterprises this value was about Rs. 4.61 lakhs in respect of workers it was Rs. 65695.

In real estate Rental & business services activities recorded second best Value Added per

worker of Rs. 63636.

Statement 4.3.2: Tabulation Category wise Distribution of Receipts, Expenditure and Gross Value Added in Delhi

Annual Gross Value Added Tabulation Category

Total Operating Expenses Including

Distributive Expenses

Total Receipt Gross Value Added

Per Worker Per Enterprise

H1 397265868 903449220 506183352 65695 460585H2 5059261680 8373181368 3313919688 35830 96282Sub-Total (H) 5456527548 9276630588 3820103040 38127 107554I1 1570536 9687060 8116524 126821 270551I2 2522742900 4547766996 2025024096 63385 71983I3 2014181820 3959180400 1944998580 50151 63456I4 2538743352 3741231708 1202488356 27226 74018Sub-Total (I) 7077238608 12257866164 5180627556 45064 69021K 4039501608 10500601560 6461099952 63636 183517M 1268808024 6505485036 5236677012 62596 234482N 1552923420 4368217152 2815293732 44599 131072O 1184275512 14952482292 13768206780 107294 249077TOTAL 20579274720 57861282792 37282008072 62998 152250

Tabulation Category-wise value Added Per Enterprise in Delhi

107.55

69.02

183.52

234.48

131.07

249.08

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

H I K M N O

Valu

e A

dded

in R

s.('0

00)

Tabulation Category-wise value Added Per Worker in Delhi

38.1345.06

63.64 62.60

44.60

107.29

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

H I K M N O

Valu

e A

dded

in R

s.('0

00)

44

Statement 4.3.3: Tabulation Category wise Distribution of Receipts, Expenditure and Gross Value Added in Delhi (OAE)







Statement 4.3.4: Tabulation Category wise Distribution of Receipts, Expenditure and

Gross Value Added in Delhi (ESTT)







45

Statement 4.3.5 gives information on the estimated annual gross value added per

worker/ enterprise (in Rupees), State/UT-wise and by type of enterprises.

Statement 4.3.5: Estimated Annual Gross Value Added Per Enterprise and Worker in Different States/UTs.

Annual GVA Per Enterprise Annual GVA Per Worker OAE ESTT. All

State/UT OAE ESTT. All

43399 131705 62796 Jammu & Kashmir 35277 37058 3607631864 165546 66055 Himachal Pradesh 26358 48692 3733534762 179664 63129 Punjab 30262 38260 3425136715 235785 106214 Chandigarh 30388 49831 4356026342 166777 51227 Uttranchal 24019 34469 2911134670 194685 70211 Haryana 28940 40042 3489949212 384307 152250 Delhi 37844 77939 6299829007 140536 47607 Rajasthan 22071 32229 2612520935 102293 31108 Uttar Pradesh 16371 23153 1861323659 79475 31000 Bihar 18316 27022 2054850808 118965 81496 Sikkim 32394 29712 3057951223 177671 109665 Arunachal Pradesh 33604 48744 4378827474 226534 80944 Nagaland 22787 54313 4042833436 197985 55623 Manipur 25018 33223 2838268495 171603 112216 Mizoram 46211 57203 5278918724 53858 24063 Tripura 16354 20279 1750632537 114159 58459 Meghalaya 20956 37170 2872823187 80113 32458 Assam 21551 25527 2299120793 131036 32761 West Bengal 18097 30603 2200121859 98999 32525 Jharkhand 18307 28822 2162713247 95129 22862 Orissa 8435 23064 1222323345 106386 39565 Chattisgarh 16736 24502 2007823940 144661 47712 Madhya Pradesh 18049 27968 2289736307 334827 95590 Gujarat 29951 54258 4351037156 204559 102369 Daman & Diu 28440 44306 3943232273 126590 56207 D & N Haveli 26613 34119 3044038384 269931 94913 Maharashtra 28706 55726 4327420910 142752 34052 Andhra Pradesh 13754 28821 1801127820 281986 86802 Karnataka 20353 65770 4245442844 293112 127851 Goa 28937 65018 5095832776 102774 48361 Lakshadweep 23290 35080 2769333097 191207 70704 Kerala 26407 43670 3541124879 193913 55855 Tamil Nadu 16904 39698 2663329617 263121 128581 Pondicherry 18148 47722 3923642894 202142 99147 And.& Nic.Island 27744 50070 4086825441 184429 51673 All India 19412 41086 28160

Note: Figures of Average Employment for states except Delhi pertains to Central Sample

46

At the all India level, the state of Delhi has recorded the highest combined Gross

Value Added per worker as well as per enterprise among 35 states/UTs. Infact GVA per

enterprise of Delhi was nearly three times of the national average of Rs. 51673. On the other

hand, the average value added per worker at the national level was only Rs. 28160 against

Rs.62998 of Delhi. Value added per worker for OAE and Establishment in Delhi was also well

ahead of the national average.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE:

This survey had also focussed on the study of the different components of capital

structure of service sector enterprises by collecting data on fixed assets. However, working

capital aspect was not covered as most of this class of enterprises were not maintaining books

of accounts and estimation of

working capital in the absence

of record based information

becomes unrealistic and simply

not feasible.

The value of fixed

capital in these enterprises was

estimated at market prices.

Components of fixed capital per

enterprise are presented in

statement 4.3.6. It worked out to

about Rs. 2.96 lakh per

enterprise. It was only about Rs.

1.00 lakh per OAE, and in case of establishments it was worked out to Rs. 7.35 lakhs.

Average Value of Fixed Assets Owned Per Enterprise in Delhi

49.2

4

103.

24

100.

21

100.

44

752.

41

735.

45

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Mar

ket V

alue

(in

Rs.

'000

)

OAE ESTT

47

Statement 4.3.6: Market Value of Assets Owned by Enterprise Type

Market Value of Assets Owned (in Rs.)

Tabulation Category

Land Building Plant Transport Tools Total

Average Value

of Fixed Assets

Per Enterpri

se 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

RURAL OAE 241989941 90308766 28077874 33391146 74411459 468179186 49241 ESTT 85727532 28418367 26642947 20764159 35199332 196752337 100435 Sub-Total 327717473 118727133 54720821 54155305 109610791 664931523 57987 URBAN OAE 9585562744 3955228461 596138626 1335609030 1052769198 16525308059 103239 ESTT. 33479886799 10841267575 2794126338 3482647416 4581681014 55179609142 752412 Sub-Total 43065449543 14796496036 3390264964 4818256446 5634450212 71704917201 307211 DELHI OAE 9827552685 4045537227 624216500 1369000176 1127180657 16993487245 100211 ESTT. 33565614331 10869685942 2820769285 3503411575 4616880346 55376361479 735449 Total 43393167016 14915223169 3444985785 4872411751 5744061003 72369848724 295540

Components of fixed Assets

are presented in the graph,

which highlights the obvious

importance of land in Delhi.

Land accounts about 59% of

the total assets of an

enterprise, Building 21%,

Plant 5%, Transport 7% and

Tools 8%.

Value of assets is also

given Tabulation Category-

wise in statement 4.3.7. Category ‘I3’ with Rs. 51578 has the lowest value and ‘H1’ with Rs.

31.15 lakhs had the highest value of fixed assets.

Composition of Market Value of Fixed Assets Owned by

Enterprises in Delhi

Building21%

Plant5%

Transport7%

Tools8%

Land59%

48

Statement 4.3.7: Tabulation Category-wise Value of Fixed Assets Owned (in Rs.).

Market Value of Assets Owned (in Rs.) Tabulation Category Land Building Plant Transport Tools Total

Average Value of

Fixed Assets Per Enterprise

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 H1 2009820803 915680838 83054973 120380038 294822265 3423758917 3115340 H2 4987856275 1811987472 166239989 200232147 585145162 7751461045 225209 I1 7036826 3518413 160823 164823 128056 11008941 366965 I2 176276836 107070573 1286840 1582970565 30996863 1898601677 67489 I3 876918094 230064992 46137849 326109549 101675706 1580906190 51578 I4 2579469899 1173273703 546530112 81588500 401823351 4782685565 294392 K 11935212698 3561913941 1068774779 1102305607 1816163440 19484370465 553423 M 10192354695 3429155716 340127419 659250969 1375363743 15996252542 716261 N 6657960732 2216026459 815273236 574352141 638407707 10902020275 507566 O 3970260158 1466531062 377399765 225057412 499534710 6538783107 118291 Total 43393167016 14915223169 3444985785 4872411751 5744061003 72369848724 295540

STRUCTURAL RATIOS:

Ratio analysis is an effective tool in the hands of entrepreneurs to assess the performance of the

enterprises. It is more a micro level indicator rather than for the Industry/sector as a whole.

Ratios alone do not indicate anything unless compared with the previous year performance or

with the other comparable enterprises in the same field. As far as unorganised service sector is

concerned, this exercise may not fit well to the situation as data is not record based. Moreover,

time series data is also not available to attempt any meaningful comparison to ascertain the

trends. However, a few structural ratios have been presented in the statement 4.3.8 for the

sector as a whole.

Statement 4.3.8: Selected Structural Ratios in Delhi by Tabulation Category.

RATIO OF Total Receipts to Value Added to

Tabulation

Category Employment Fixed

Assets Operating

Expenditure Employment Fixed Assets

Total Receipts

Fixed Assets to

Employment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

H1 117255 0.26 2.27 65695 0.15 0.56 444355H2 90531 1.08 1.66 35830 0.43 0.40 83809I1 151360 0.88 6.17 126821 0.74 0.84 172015I2 142349 2.40 1.80 63385 1.07 0.45 59428I3 102085 2.50 1.97 50151 1.23 0.49 40763I4 84706 0.78 1.47 27226 0.25 0.32 108286K 103422 0.54 2.60 63636 0.33 0.62 191904M 77762 0.41 5.13 62596 0.33 0.80 191208N 69201 0.40 2.81 44599 0.26 0.64 172708O 116523 2.29 12.63 107294 2.11 0.92 50956

Total 97773 0.80 2.81 62998 0.52 0.64 122289

49

Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio: This ratio is useful to determine the efficiency of the firm as amount of receipts that are

generated from each rupee inverted in fixed asset.

sFixedAsset

ceiptsTotalatiosTurnoverRFixedAsset Re=

The higher the level of receipts generated by each 'unit' of fixed assets the more

efficient the enterprise in proper utilisation of assets and vice versa. In interpreting this ratio a

little care is needed. The figure given for the

ratio depends critically on the value of the

estimated fixed assets. For example, firms with

higher market value of fixed assets will have a

lower figure than the firm with lower value.

Therefore, enterprises with low profit margins

tend to have high asset turnover, those with

high profit margins have low asset turnover.

This ratio was 0.80 for the service

sector in Delhi. Activities wise presentation

revealed that category ‘H2’, ‘I2’ ‘I3’and ‘O’

had a very healthy position.

Earning- Expenditure Ratio : This ratio is also called operating self-sufficiency ratio as it indicates the degree to which

operating income covers the operating expenditure.

ituretingExpendTotalOperaceiptsTotaleRatioExpenditurEarning Re

=−

Accordingly higher the ratio greater will be the operating efficiency of the firm. This

ratio stood at 2.81 for service sector in Delhi. It implies that for every rupee spent 2.81 is

earned by this sector. Tabulation category wise analysis revealed that category ‘O’ recorded

the best ratio 12.63 followed by 6.17 by category ‘I1’. However, Tabulation category ‘I4’ had

the lowest ratio of 1.47.

Comparison of Selected Structural Ratios

7954

6

4477

1

1E+0

5

6020

5

2816

0

8348

2

020000400006000080000

100000120000140000

Total Receiptsto

Employment

Value Addedto

Employment

Fixed Assetsto

Employment

DELHI ALL INDIA

50

Receipts –Employment Ratio :

It refers to the amount of receipts per

worker and it was estimated as 97773 in

Delhi.

EmploymentceiptsTotalRatioEmploymentceipts ReRe =−

Activities in the field of ‘I1’ and ‘I2’ has

managed the best ratio.

Similarly these ratios have also been

worked out and presented in the statement 4.3.8 with respect to GVA.

Statement 4.3.9: Comparison of Selected Structural Ratios of Delhi & All India.

RATIO OF Total Receipts to Value Added to ITEM

Employment Fixed Assets

Operating Expenditure Employment Fixed

Assets Total

Receipts

Fixed Assets to

Employment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

DELHI OAE 69247 0.90 2.21 37844 0.49 0.55 77061ESTT 114716 0.77 3.12 77939 0.52 0.68 149152COMBINED 97773 0.80 2.81 62998 0.52 0.64 122289ALL-INDIA OAE 40056 1.02 1.94 19412 0.49 0.48 39351 ESTT 89975 0.61 1.85 41086 0.28 0.46 148687 COMBINED 60205 0.72 1.89 28160 0.34 0.47 83482

Note: Figure pertaining to All India are based on Central Sample.

Comparison of ratios of Delhi and all-India have been presented in statement 4.3.9. It

helps to understand superiority of performance in Delhi.

Statement 4.3.10 and 4.3.11 gives estimated structural ratios by tabulation category for

OAE and Establishment respectively. These estimates are of significant interest to those

seeking data to evaluate the performance and profitability of businesses of varying sizes.

Comparison of Selected Structural Ratios

0.9

2.21

0.49 0.55

1.89

0.72

0.34 0.47

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

TotalReceipts to

Fixed Assets

TotalReceipts toOperating

Expenditure

Value Addedto FixedAssets

Value Addedto TotalReceipts

DELHI ALL INDIA

51

Statement 4.3.10: Selected Structural Ratios in Delhi by Tabulation Category(OAE).


Tabulation


Assets Operating


Total Receipts

Fixed Assets to

Employment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

H1 48064 0.30 3.45 34125 0.21 0.71 160213

H2 93745 2.69 1.63 36254 1.04 0.39 34884

I1 - - - - - - -

I2 138321 3.11 1.81 62057 1.40 0.45 44421

I3 37730 7.39 4.75 29792 5.84 0.79 5103

I4 141716 0.73 1.37 38061 0.20 0.27 194912

K 89949 0.34 3.87 66727 0.25 0.74 265789

M 44953 0.35 5.94 37387 0.29 0.83 127105

N 94984 0.63 2.50 56959 0.38 0.60 149613

O 31203 0.71 3.62 22592 0.52 0.72 43678

Total 69247 0.90 2.21 37844 0.49 0.55 77061 Statement 4.3.11: Selected Structural Ratios in Delhi by Tabulation Category (ESTT).


Tabulation


Assets Operating


Total Receipts

Fixed Assets to

Employment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

H1 117935 0.26 2.27 66006 0.15 0.56 447148

H2 89235 0.86 1.67 35659 0.34 0.40 103524

I1 151360 0.88 6.17 126821 0.74 0.84 172015

I2 167563 1.09 1.75 71699 0.47 0.43 153360

I3 291636 2.00 1.61 110116 0.76 0.38 145793

I4 61601 0.84 1.59 22835 0.31 0.37 73178

K 106409 0.61 2.45 62951 0.36 0.59 175520

M 84297 0.41 5.05 67617 0.33 0.80 203976

N 61718 0.34 2.98 41013 0.23 0.66 179410

O 249287 4.00 24.46 239096 3.84 0.96 62281

Total 114716 0.77 3.12 77939 0.52 0.68 149152

52

4.4. OTHER FEATURES NATURE OF OPERATION:

Based on the nature of operation, enterprises were classified into three groups viz.

perennial, seasonal and casual type of enterprises.

Statement 4.4.1: Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Operation and Tabulation

Category

Nature of Operation Tabulation Category Perennial Seasonal Casual Total

% age of Perennial to

Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

H1 1099 0 0 1099 100.00

H2 34357 62 0 34419 99.82

I1 30 0 0 30 100.00

I2 28089 43 0 28132 99.85

I3 30416 235 0 30651 99.23

I4 16231 15 0 16246 99.91

K 34808 399 0 35207 98.87

M 22063 228 42 22333 98.79

N 21479 0 0 21479 100.00

O 54484 739 54 55277 98.57

TOTAL 243056 1721 96 244873

%age to Total 99.26 0.70 0.04

Out of the total enterprises, 2.43

lakh (99.26%) were perennial in nature as

they were operational throughout the year.

The rest of the 1817 enterprises constituting

only 0.74% were seasonal/ casual in nature.

This proportion was more or less same in

all tabulation categories.

The insignificance of

seasonal/casual type of enterprises in the

unorganised service sector of Delhi is

clearly visible in the graph.

Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

Casual0.04%Seasonal

0.70%

Perennial99.26%

53

TYPE OF PREMISES:

Enterprises have been classified into two broad groups with respect to type of premises

viz. Enterprises within Household premises and outside household premises. Enterprise

operating outside the household premises can be further classified into enterprises with fixed

premises and without fixed premises.

Statement 4.4.2: Tabulation Category-wise Distribution of Enterprises by Type of Premises in Delhi

Type of Location Outside Household Premises

With Fixed Premises Without Fixed Premises Tabulation category

Within Household

Premises

Permanent

Structure

Temporary Struct

ure

Without

Structure

Sub-Total

Mobile Market

Street Vendor

s

Sub-Total

Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10H1 148 951 0 0 951 0 0 0 1099H2 4522 18966 4890 3461 27317 128 2452 2580 34419I1 27 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 30I2 5131 1223 30 702 1955 562 20484 21046 28132I3 9684 2345 32 2354 4731 67 16169 16236 30651I4 4625 11198 235 0 11433 26 162 188 16246K 6608 28359 71 169 28599 0 0 0 35207M 12023 10076 0 10 10086 0 224 224 22333N 4145 17121 198 3 17322 12 0 12 21479O 15042 28055 6261 5152 39468 6 761 767 55277

TOTAL 61955 118297 11717 11851 141865 801 40252 41053 244873%age 25.30 48.31 4.78 4.84 57.93 0.33 16.44 16.77 100.00

Out of the total enterprises, 25.30% were household based. 57.93% have independent

premises outside household and 16.77% were either mobile/hawkers type.

Distribution of Enterprises by Type of Location

Outside H'Hold Premises &

without Fixed Premises16.77%

Temporary Structure with Fixed Premises

4.78%Without Structure with Fixed Premises

4.84%Street Vendors16.44%

Mobile Market0.33%

With in Household Premises25.30%

Permanent Structure with Fixed Premises

48.31%

54

Enterprises located outside household premises and with fixed premises can further be divided

on the basis of type of structure. Out of 141865, 83.39% of the enterprises were having

permanent structure, 8.26% with Temporary structure and remaining 8.35% with fixed

location.

Statement 4.4.3: Sector-wise Distribution of Enterprises by Type of Premises

Type of Location Outside Household Premises

Item Within Household Premises

With Fixed Premises

Without Fixed Premises

Total

%age of Enterprises

operating from Household Premises

1 2 3 4 5 6 RURAL OAE 1184 8069 255 9508 12.45ESTT 59 1896 4 1959 3.01Sub-Total 1243 9965 259 11467 %age to Total 10.84 86.90 2.26 100.00 URBAN OAE 51569 68338 40162 160069 32.22ESTT 9143 63562 632 73337 12.47Sub-Total 60712 131900 40794 233406 %age to Total 26.01 56.51 17.48 100.00 DELHI OAE 52753 76407 40417 169577 31.11ESTT 9202 65458 636 75296 12.22Total 61955 141865 41053 244873 %age to Total 25.30 57.93 16.77 100.00

Analysis of related data revealed that out of the total own-account enterprises 31.11%

were located within household premises; however this proportion was only 12.22% for

establishments. Sector-wise data revealed that the proportion of enterprises operating from

outside household premises were more i.e only 12.45% were operating from household

Distribution of Enterprises by Type of Location

527539202

76407 65458

40417636

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

OAE ESTABLISHMENTEnte

rpris

e (in

Per

cent

age)

Out side Household Premises and Without Fixed PremisesOutside Household Premises but with Fixed PremisesWithin Household Premises

55

premises in rural area as compared to 32.22% operating from household premises in urban

areas.

SIZE OF EMPLOYMENT: Enterprises have been arranged in terms of their size-class of employment to ascertain

the intensity of employment.

Statement 4.4.4 :Distribution of Enterprises by Size of Employment

No. of Enterprises by Size of Employment S.

No. Item 1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-

19 20-49

50 or More All

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A RURAL OAE 8447 965 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 9508 ESTT 0 1549 202 18 126 64 0 0 0 1959 Sub-Total 8447 2514 298 18 126 64 0 0 0 11467B URBAN OAE 122281 28597 6918 2005 90 178 0 0 0 160069 ESTT. 1207 19384 13555 10041 8119 15214 4620 1023 174 73337 Sub-Total 123488 47981 20473 12046 8209 15392 4620 1023 174 233406

C DELHI OAE 130728 29562 7014 2005 90 178 0 0 0 169577 ESTT. 1207 20933 13757 10059 8245 15278 4620 1023 174 75296 Total 131935 50495 20771 12064 8335 15456 4620 1023 174 244873 Percentage 53.88 20.62 8.48 4.93 3.40 6.31 1.89 0.42 0.07 100.00

It was found that 53.88% enterprises

were having only one person looking

after the affairs of the enterprise.

Enterprises employing 2 persons were

to the extent of 20.62%, 16.81%

employs in the range of 3-5 persons ,

6.31% in 6-9 category while enterprises

employing 10 or more persons were

2.38% only. Size class of employment

is also presented sector and enterprise

type in statement 4.4.4 in Rural area,

73.66% of enterprises were having only

one employee while in urban area this

class was having the share of 52.91%. In case of OAE’s it was observed that 77.09% of them

were employing one person only.

Distribution of Enterprises by Size of Employment

38.48%

44.93%

53.40%

220.62%

153.88%

20-490.42%

More Than 500.07%

10-191.89%

6-96.31%

56

TYPE OF OWNERSHIP:

During the Survey data was also collected on the type of ownership of enterprises and

their results are presented in Statement 4.4.5 gives details of Type of ownership by sector and

enterprise type.

Statement 4.4.5: Distribution of enterprises by type of ownership.

Type of Ownership

Item

Proprietary Partnership Co-op Society

Ltd. Company Others Total

%age of Proprietary Enterprises

in Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

RURAL OAE 9508 0 0 0 0 9508 100.00ESTT 1957 0 0 0 2 1959 99.90Sub-Total 11465 0 0 0 2 11467 99.98URBAN OAE 154932 5137 0 0 0 160069 96.79ESTT 64458 5633 710 867 1669 73337 87.89Sub-Total 219390 10770 710 867 1669 233406 94.00DELHI OAE 164440 5137 0 0 0 169577 96.97ESTT 66415 5633 710 867 1671 75296 88.21TOTAL 230855 10770 710 867 1671 244873 94.28

Out of the total enterprises, 94.28%

were proprietary in nature. 4.4% were

partnership type and rest of the 1.32%

were operating as cooperative society

/ limited company etc. . It was

observed that among OAE’s 96.97%

were proprietary and in case of

establishments 88.21% were in this

category.

In rural areas, with the

exception of two enterprises, all were

of proprietary in nature whereas in

case of urban areas the share of

proprietary enterprises was 94%.

Distribution of Enterprises by Type of Ownership

Limited Company

0.35%

Cooperative Society

0.29%Others0.68%

Partnership4.40%

Proprietary94.28%

57

Statement 4.4.6: Distribution of Enterprises & Employment by Type of Ownership.

Type of Ownership Tabulation Category Proprietary Partnership Co-op

Society Ltd.

Company Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 H1 897 183 0 19 0 1099H2 31795 2624 0 0 0 34419I1 30 0 0 0 0 30I2 27926 196 0 10 0 28132I3 30247 335 0 69 0 30651I4 14966 1235 0 44 0 16245K 31895 2697 0 616 0 35208M 20051 625 515 0 1143 22334N 20289 648 57 44 440 21478O 52759 2227 138 65 88 55277TOTAL 230855 10770 710 867 1671 244873%age to Total 94.28 4.40 0.29 0.35 0.68 100.00

Another interesting finding available from the

survey was the number of enterprises owned and

managed by women. On the whole, 9.75% were

in this category. Distribution of women managed

enterprises across the tabulation category

revealed that it was highest in category ‘M’ with

33.52% followed by 19.71% in category ‘O’

consisting of Other community, social and

personal service activities & other transport.

Statement 4.4.7 : Distribution of Proprietary Type of enterprise by gender of owner

Proprietary Tabulation Category

Male Female Total

%age of Enterprises

owned by Female

1 2 3 4 5 H1 897 0 897 0.00H2 30713 1082 31795 3.40I1 30 0 30 0.00I2 27905 21 27926 0.08I3 30193 54 30247 0.18I4 13372 1594 14966 10.65K 31155 740 31895 2.32M 13329 6722 20051 33.52N 18403 1886 20289 9.30O 42361 10398 52759 19.71

TOTAL 208358 22497 230855 9.75

Distribution of Enterprises by Gender of Owner

Male90.25%

Female9.75%

58

Statement 4.4.8 : Distribution of Partnership Type of enterprise.

Partnership Tabulation Category

Within Household Others Total

%age of Partnership

Enterprises within Household

1 2 3 4 5 H1 132 51 183 72.13H2 2531 93 2624 96.46I1 0 0 0 -I2 88 108 196 44.90I3 52 283 335 15.52I4 1035 200 1235 83.81K 1294 1403 2697 47.98M 388 237 625 62.08N 600 48 648 92.59O 1313 914 2227 58.96

TOTAL 7433 3337 10770 69.02 Distribution of partnership enterprises presented in statement 4.4.8 revealed that about

69% partnership enterprises were formed out of the family members and whereas rest of the

31% were partnership enterprises composed of members outside household. The share of

family based partnership enterprises was maximum in Restaurants (H2) with 96.46% followed

by enterprises engaged in the field of ‘health and social work’ with 92.59%. While in case of

‘other transport related activities’ nearly 85% of the enterprises, partnership was forged

between persons outside family.

SOCIAL GROUP OF OWNER:

Social group of owner of enterprises in terms of SC, OBC and Others is relevant for

privately managed enterprises namely, proprietary and partnership type only. Social group of

owner of private service sector enterprises indicated that 30432 (12.59%) were held by SC,

33671 (13.94%) by OBC and remaining 177522 (73.47%) were headed by persons belonging

to other social groups.

59

Statement 4.4.8 : Tabulation Category wise Distribution of Enterprises by Social Group of Owner and

Social Group of Ownership Tabulation Category SC OBC Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 H1 8 37 1035 1080H2 3009 6173 25238 34420I1 0 0 30 30I2 3923 3918 20280 28121I3 6707 8046 15829 30582I4 491 816 14894 16201K 999 1014 32579 34592M 204 1596 18876 20676N 469 513 19955 20937O 14622 11558 28806 54986

TOTAL 30432 33671 177522 241625%age to Total 12.59 13.94 73.47 100.00

NATURE OF PROBLEMS FACED: During the course of survey, entrepreneurs were asked to provide information regarding

the problems faced by them in the management of their enterprise. The notable among them

were power cuts (10.14%), shortage of capital (16.42%), local problems (13.64%)

competition from other units (13.35%). However, 35.92% stated to have no specific problems.

Statement 4.4.9: Nature of Problems faced by Enterprise type in Delhi

S.NO. NATURE OF PROBLEM FACED OAE ESTT COMBINED

1 Non Availability of Electricity Connection 0.16 0.16 0.16

2 Power Cut 8.60 13.60 10.14

3 Shortage of Capital 20.39 7.48 16.42

4 Mktg. of Products/Services 2.31 3.08 2.54

5 Lack of Infrastructure Facilities 0.79 1.03 0.87

6 Local Problems 12.83 15.45 13.64

7 Harassment 4.56 0.80 3.40

8 Competition from other units 13.27 13.53 13.35

9 Non-availability of Labour 0.05 0.16 0.08

10 Labour Problems 0.01 0.10 0.04

11 Fuel Not Available or available at exorbitant prices 3.13 0.23 2.24

12 Non-recovery of service charges/fees/credit 0.19 0.13 0.17

13 No Specific Problem 32.61 43.38 35.92

14 Other 1.10 0.87 1.03

TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00

60

MAINTENANCE OF ACCOUNTS:

Accounts maintenance may be taken to mean that books of accounts are maintained and

information to the survey was also provided from them. This is an area where this sector was

found lagging behind perhaps due to the complexity involved. Despite the obvious conclusions

available on the practice of maintenance of accounts, information was collected to build up

database for comparison for the future.

Statement 4.4.10: Percentage Distribution of Enterprises Maintaining Accounts in Delhi.

Percentage of Enterprises Maintaining Book of Accounts Tabulation category

OAE ESTT ALL

H1 0.00 9.38 8.74

H2 0.00 2.82 1.23

I1 0.00 0.00 0.00

I2 0.01 3.27 0.13

I3 0.25 16.94 1.39

I4 1.72 5.40 3.02

K 2.07 9.10 6.18

M 0.17 13.58 6.03

N 5.74 30.42 15.20

O 0.00 8.79 1.88

TOTAL 0.79 10.57 3.80

It was observed that only 3.80% of these enterprises were found to be maintaining

books of accounts. Coming to the practice of maintenance of accounts by enterprise type

revealed that 10.57% establishments and less than one percent OAE’s were in the habit of

account maintenance. Among establishments, enterprises falling under the tabulation category

‘N’ were having the highest proportion of enterprises maintaining accounts with 30.42%, this

was followed by category ‘I3’ with 16.94%.

61

MISCELLANEOUS FEATURES:

Data is also available on the other features like, pursuing of mixed activity, registration

status of enterprises and receipt of assistance, if any.

Mixed activity refers to a state where enterprise carry out multiple activities

simultaneously. If separate book of accounts are available it can be treated as separate

enterprise, however, in its absence, data has to be collected for the mixed activities under one

enterprise. Survey revealed that only 1.31% of OAE, 4.92% of Establishments were pursuing

mixed activities. In case of Delhi as a whole, the contribution of such enterprises was 2.42% in

the total number of enterprises.

Statement 4.4.11: Miscellaneous Features of Service Sector in Delhi S.No. Item OAE ESTT. Combined

2229 3704 59331 Pursuing Mixed Activity

(1.31) (4.92) (2.42)

158125 68644 2267692 Registered Under Any Authority

(93.25) (91.17) (92.61)

5254 2433 76873 Enterprises Received Assistance

(3.10) (3.23) (3.14)

Total Number of Enterprises 169577 75296 244873

Note : Figures in parentheses pertains to percentage to total

Coming to the status of registration of enterprises, as high as 93.25% of the Own

Account enterprises and 91.17% of establishments were registered under some authority or act.

Further, only 3.14% of the enterprises in Delhi have availed of any type of assistance.

GROWTH STATUS OF ENTERPRISES

Enterprises were also asked to give their subjective assessment of the growth status of

their enterprise based on the performance of last three years preceding the date of survey.

62

Statement 4.4.12: Growth Status of Enterprises in Percentage by Tabulation Category

Growth Status of Enterprises (Percentage) Tabulation Category Expanding Stagnant Contracting Not Applicable Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

H1 4.91 44.59 32.94 17.56 100.00

H2 18.17 60.78 8.45 12.59 100.00

I1 10.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 100.00

I2 24.84 50.65 19.40 5.11 100.00

I3 15.14 58.78 15.91 10.16 100.00

I4 16.03 41.05 8.81 34.11 100.00

K 18.75 47.00 19.07 15.18 100.00

M 24.31 40.58 3.63 31.49 100.00

N 28.55 51.64 5.03 14.79 100.00

O 18.69 57.48 5.65 18.18 100.00

TOTAL 20.03 52.61 10.93 16.44 100.00

Analysis of the overall opinion on growth status of enterprise revealed that 20.03%

were expanding, 52.61% stagnant, 10.93% were contracting and rest of the 16.44% enterprises,

this question was reported to be not relevant.

COMPARISON OF MAIN FINDINGS OF CENTRAL-STATE SAMPLES

Selected findings of Central and State Samples are presented in statement 4.4.13 for

enterprises and employment under NSS 57th round. To start with the coverage under the state

sample is about 84% more than the sample covered under central sample. Coming to the

estimated number of enterprises and employment negligible variation was found between

central and state samples. Thus they are more or less comparable in this respect.

The most important indicator / outcome of the survey, namely Value added per worker

was found to be comparable in both sets of data for OAE though variation is observed in case

of establishment. The estimated market value of fixed assets brought out by both samples of

63

data is also comparable. In case of financial ratios, with some minor exceptions two sets of

data are comparable.

Statement 4.4.13: Comparison of Key results of NSS 57th Round –Central & State

Samples.

NUMBER S.NO ITEM

OAE ESTT. TOTAL A SAMPLE (ENTERPRISES)

1 CENTRAL SAMPLE 1772 1357 3129 2 STATE SAMPLE 3673 2088 5761

B ENTERPRISES 1 CENTRAL SAMPLE 166338 80971 247309 2 STATE SAMPLE 169577 75296 244873

C EMPLOYMENT 1 CENTRAL SAMPLE 214012 391640 605652 2 STATE SAMPLE 220520 371274 591794

D AVERAGE EMPLOYMENT 1 CENTRAL SAMPLE 1.29 4.84 2.45 2 STATE SAMPLE 1.30 4.93 2.42

E GVA/WORKER/YEARLY (RS.) 1 CENTRAL SAMPLE 32411 100989 76756 2 STATE SAMPLE 37844 77939 62998

F MARKET VALUE OF FIXED ASSETS OWNED/ENTERPRISE (RS.000)

1 CENTRAL SAMPLE 89 880 348 2 STATE SAMPLE 100 735 296

Statement 4.4.14: Comparison of Structural Ratios of State & Central Sample

RATIO OF Total Receipts to Value Added to ITEM

Employment Fixed Assets

Operating Expenditure Employment Fixed

Assets Total

Receipts

Fixed Assets to

Employment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

STATE SAMPLE OAE 69247 0.90 2.21 37844 0.49 0.55 77061ESTT 114716 0.77 3.12 77939 0.52 0.68 149152COMBINED 97773 0.80 2.81 62998 0.52 0.64 122289CENTRAL SAMPLE OAE 60590 0.58 2.15 32411 0.31 0.53 104903 ESTT 218408 0.85 1.87 100989 0.39 0.46 258398 COMBINED 162642 0.80 1.90 76757 0.38 0.47 204159

⌧⌧⌧

SSEECCTTIIOONN FFIIVVEE

SSTTAATTIISSTTIICCAALL TTAABBLLEESS

LIST OF STATISTICAL TABLES S.No. Table No. Description

1 Table 1 Sample Number of Enterprises 2 Table 2 Sample Number of Workers 3 Table 3 Estimated Number of Enterprises 4 Table 4 Estimated Number of Workers 5 Table 5(RO) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 6 Table 5(RE) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 7 Table 5(RT) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 8 Table 5(UO) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 9 Table 5(UE) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

10 Table 5(UT) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 11 Table 5(DO) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 12 Table 5(DE) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 13 Table 5(DT) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation 14 Table 6(RO) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 15 Table 6(RE) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 16 Table 6(RT) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 17 Table 6(UO) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 18 Table 6(UE) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 19 Table 6(UT) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 20 Table 6(DO) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 21 Table 6(DE) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 22 Table 6(DE) Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity 23 Table 7(RO) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 24 Table 7(RE) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 25 Table 7(RT) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 26 Table 7(UO) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 27 Table 7(UE) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 28 Table 7(UT) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 29 Table 7(DO) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 30 Table 7(DE) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 31 Table 7(DT) Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner 32 Table 8(RO) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 33 Table 8(RE) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 34 Table 8(RT) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 35 Table 8(UO) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 36 Table 8(UE) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 37 Table 8(UT) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 38 Table 8(DO) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 39 Table 8(DE) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 40 Table 8(DT) Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location 41 Table 9(RO) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 42 Table 9(RE) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 43 Table 9(RT) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 44 Table 9(UO) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 45 Table 9(UE) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 46 Table 9(UT) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 47 Table 9(DO) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 48 Table 9(DE) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts 49 Table 9(DT) Enterprises by Maintenance of Accounts

S.No. Table No. Description

50 Table 10(RO) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 51 Table 10(RE) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 52 Table 10(RT) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 53 Table 10(UO) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 54 Table 10(UE) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 55 Table 10(UT) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 56 Table 10(DO) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 57 Table 10(DE) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 58 Table 10(DT) Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time 59 Table 11(RO) Distribution of Employment by Type 60 Table 11(RE) Distribution of Employment by Type 61 Table 11(RT) Distribution of Employment by Type 62 Table 11(UO) Distribution of Employment by Type 63 Table 11(UE) Distribution of Employment by Type 64 Table 11(UT) Distribution of Employment by Type 65 Table 11(DO) Distribution of Employment by Type 66 Table 11(DE) Distribution of Employment by Type 67 Table 11(DT) Distribution of Employment by Type 68 Table 12(RO) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 69 Table 12(RE) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 70 Table 12(RT) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 71 Table 12(UO) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 72 Table 12(UE) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 73 Table 12(UT) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 74 Table 12(DO) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 75 Table 12(DE) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 76 Table 12(DT) Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size 77 Table 13(RO) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 78 Table 13(RE) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 79 Table 13(RT) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 80 Table 13(UO) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 81 Table 13(UE) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 82 Table 13(UT) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 83 Table 13(DO) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 84 Table 13(DE) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 85 Table 13(DT) Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.) 86 Table 14(RO) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 87 Table 14(RE) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 88 Table 14(RT) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 89 Table 14(UO) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 90 Table 14(UE) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 91 Table 14(UT) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 92 Table 14(DO) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 93 Table 14(DE) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding 94 Table 14(DT) Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

S.No. Table No. Description

95 Table 15(RO) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 96 Table 15(RE) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 97 Table 15(RT) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 98 Table 15(UO) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 99 Table 15(UE) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 100 Table 15(UT) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 101 Table 15(DO) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 102 Table 15(DE) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 103 Table 15(DT) Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.) 104 Table 16(RO) Growth Status of Enterprises 105 Table 16(RE) Growth Status of Enterprises 106 Table 16(RT) Growth Status of Enterprises 107 Table 16(UO) Growth Status of Enterprises 108 Table 16(UE) Growth Status of Enterprises 109 Table 16(UT) Growth Status of Enterprises 110 Table 16(DO) Growth Status of Enterprises 111 Table 16(DE) Growth Status of Enterprises 112 Table 16(DT) Growth Status of Enterprises 113 Table 17(RO) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 114 Table 17(RE) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 115 Table 17(RT) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 116 Table 17(UO) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 117 Table 17(UE) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 118 Table 17(UT) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 119 Table 17(DO) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 120 Table 17(DE) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 121 Table 17(DT) Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced 122 Table 18 Miscellaneous Features of Enterprises

Abbreviations used in Table Names

RO : Own Account Enterprises - Rural RE : Establishments - Rural RT : Total Enterprises - Rural UO : Own Account Enterprises - Urban UE : Establishments - Urban UT : Total Enterprises - Urban DO : Own Account Enterprises - Delhi DE : Establishments - Delhi DT : Total Enterprises - Delhi

Table 1: Sample Number of Enterprises

OAE ESTT. ALL OAE ESTT. ALL OAE ESTT. ALL1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

H1 0 0 0 1 52 53 1 52 53H2 21 10 31 554 480 1034 575 490 1065I1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 2I2 9 2 11 627 71 698 636 73 709I3 17 2 19 558 86 644 575 88 663I4 18 6 24 292 200 492 310 206 516K 13 3 16 337 445 782 350 448 798M 9 5 14 331 189 520 340 194 534N 13 3 16 234 225 459 247 228 475O 25 9 34 614 298 912 639 307 946TOTAL 125 41 166 3548 2047 5595 3673 2088 5761

Table 2: Sample Number of Workers



ST- 1

Tabulation

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Tabulation

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Table 3: Estimated Number of Enterprises



Table 4: Estimated Number of Workers



Tabulation

RURAL URBAN DELHI

Tabulation

RURAL URBAN DELHI

ST- 2

Table 5(RO): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

RURAL- OAE

Perenial Seasonal Casual Total1 2 3 4 5

H1 0 0 0 0H2 1381 0 0 1381I1 0 0 0 0I2 1163 0 0 1163I3 1637 0 0 1637I4 719 0 0 719K 948 13 0 961M 309 0 0 309N 2469 0 0 2469O 869 0 0 869TOTAL 9495 13 0 9508

Table 5(RE): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

RURAL- ESTT



Table 5(RT): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

RURAL- TOTAL



Nature of OperationTabulation Category

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

ST - 3

Table 5(UO): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

URBAN - OAE



Table 5(UE): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

URBAN - ESTT.



Table 5(UT): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

URBAN - TOTAL



ST - 4

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Table 5(DO): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

DELHI - OAE



Table 5(DE): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

DELHI - ESTT



Table 5(DT): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Nature of Operation

DELHI - TOTAL



ST - 5

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Tabulation Category

Nature of Operation

Table 6(RO): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

RURAL - OAE

Male Female Total Household Others Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11H1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H2 1381 0 1381 0 0 0 0 0 0 1381I1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I2 1163 0 1163 0 0 0 0 0 0 1163I3 1637 0 1637 0 0 0 0 0 0 1637I4 702 17 719 0 0 0 0 0 0 719K 961 0 961 0 0 0 0 0 0 961M 190 119 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 309N 2469 0 2469 0 0 0 0 0 0 2469O 863 6 869 0 0 0 0 0 0 869TOTAL 9366 142 9508 0 0 0 0 0 0 9508

Table 6(RE): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

RURAL - ESTT.



ST - 6

Type of OwnershipTab. Cat.

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Proprietory Partnership Co-op Society

Tab. Cat.

Type of OwnershipProprietory Partnership Co-op

Society

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Table 6(RT): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

RURAL - TOTAL



Table 6(UO): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

URBAN - OAE



ST - 7

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Tab. Cat.

Type of Ownership

Tab. Cat.


Society

Others TotalProprietory Partnership Co-op

Society

Ltd. Compan

y

Table 6(UE): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

URBAN - ESTT.



Table 6(UT): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

URBAN - TOTAL



ST - 8

Tab. Cat.


Society

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Tab. Cat.


Society

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Table 6(DO): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

DELHI - OAE



Table 6(DE): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

DELHI - ESTT.



ST - 9

Total

Tab. Cat.


Society

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Tab. Cat.


Society

Ltd. Compan

yOthers

Table 6(DT): Estimated number of Enterprises by type of ownership & tabulation category/activity

DELHI - TOTAL



ST - 10

Tab. Cat.


Society

Ltd. Compan

yOthers Total

Table 7(RO):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

RURAL- OAE

SC OBC Others Total1 3 4 5 6


Table 7(RE):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

RURAL- ESTT.



Table 7(RT):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

RURAL- TOTAL



ST - 11

Tabulation Category

Tabulation Category

Social Group of Owner



Tabulation Category

Table 7(UO):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

URBAN- OAE



Table 7(UE):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

URBAN- ESTT.



Table 7(UT):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

URBAN- TOTAL



ST - 12

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 7(DO):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

DELHI- OAE



Table 7(DE):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

DELHI- ESTT.



Table 7(DT):Estt Proprietary & Partnership Enterprises by Social Group of Owner

DELHI- TOTAL



ST - 13

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 8(RO): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

RURAL - OAE


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure

Without Structure Street Vendors

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8H1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H2 54 1120 109 0 0 98 1381I1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I2 401 328 0 381 0 53 1163I3 186 35 0 1312 0 104 1637I4 68 651 0 0 0 0 719K 13 948 0 0 0 0 961M 189 120 0 0 0 0 309N 261 2208 0 0 0 0 2469O 12 839 0 18 0 0 869TOTAL 1184 6249 109 1711 0 255 9508

Table 8(RE): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

RURAL - ESTT.


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Table 8(RT): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

RURAL - TOTAL


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Total

ST - 14

Outside Household Premises with

With Fixed PremisesMobile Market

Tabulation category

Type of Location

Within Household

Type of Location

Tabulation category Within

Household


TotalWith Fixed Premises

Mobile Market

Tabulation category

Type of Location

Within Household


TotalWith Fixed PremisesMobile Market

Table 8(UO): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

URBAN-OAE


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Table 8(UE): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

URBAN-ESTT.


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Table 8(UT): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

URBAN - TOTAL


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Total

Total

Total

ST - 15

Within Household



Within Household



Tabulation category

Type of Location

Tabulation category

Type of Location

Tabulation category

Type of Location

Within Household



Table 8(DO): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

DELHI - OAE


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Table 8(DE): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

DELHI - ESTT.


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



Table 8(DT): Estimated Number of Enterprises by Type of Location

DELHI - TOTAL


Permanent Structure

Temporary Structure



ST - 16

Total

Total

Total

Within Household



Within Household



Tabulation category

Type of Location

Tabulation category

Type of Location

Tabulation category

Type of Location

Within Household



Table 9(RO) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

RURAL - OAE

yes no all1 2 3 4

H1 0 0 0H2 0 1381 1381I1 0 0 0I2 0 1163 1163I3 0 1637 1637I4 9 711 720K 0 961 961M 0 309 309N 195 2273 2468O 0 869 869TOTAL 204 9304 9508

Table 9(RE) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

RURAL - ESTT

yes no all1 2 3 4


Table 9(RT) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

RURAL - TOTAL

yes no all1 2 3 4


Maintenance of AccountTabulation category

Tabulation category

Maintenance of Account

Tabulation category


ST - 17

Table 9(UO) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

URBAN - OAE

yes no all1 2 3 4


Table 9(UE) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

URBAN - ESTT.

yes no all1 2 3 4


Table 9(UT) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

URBAN - TOTAL

yes no all1 2 3 4




ST - 18

Tabulation category

Tabulation category


Tabulation category

Table 9(DO) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

DELHI - OAE

yes no all1 2 3 4


Table 9(DE) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

DELHI - ESTT

yes no all1 2 3 4


Table 9(DT) : Enterprises by Mainetnance of Accounts

DELHI - TOTAL

yes no all1 2 3 4


ST - 19

Tabulation category


Tabulation category


Tabulation category


Table 10(RO): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

RURAL - OAE

Male Female All Male Female All Male Female All1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Table 10(RE): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

RURAL - ESTT.



Table 10(RT): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

RURAL - TOTAL



Tabulation Category

Full Time Part Time

ST - 20

Total

Tabulation Category

Full Time Part Time Total

Full Time Part Time TotalTabulation Category

Table 10(UO): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

URBAN - OAE



Table 10(UE): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

URBAN - ESTT.



Table 10(UT): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

URBAN - TOTAL



ST - 21

Part Time TotalTabulation Category

Full Time

Part Time TotalTabulation Category

Full Time

Tabulation Category


Table 10(DO): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

DELHI - OAE



Table 10(DE): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

DELHI - ESTT.



Table 10(DT): Distribution of Employment by Duration of Time

DELHI - TOTAL



ST - 22

Part Time Total

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category

Full Time

Tabulation Category


Table 11(RO) : Distribution of Employment by Type

RURAL - OAE

Skilled Unskilled Total Skilled Unskille

d Total Skilled Unskilled Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19H1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H2 1381 0 1381 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 34 200 1547 34 1581I1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I2 1163 0 1163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1163 0 1163I3 1636 0 1636 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 1672 0 1672I4 698 22 720 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 36 734 22 756K 961 0 961 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 67 1028 0 1028M 190 119 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 140 330 119 449N 2469 0 2469 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2469 0 2469O 1536 6 1542 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 1540 6 1546TOTAL 10034 147 10181 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 449 34 483 10483 181 10664

Table 11(RE) : Distribution of Employment by Type

RURAL - ESTT




ST - 23

FemaleMale

Working OwnerTabulation Category Male Female All

Male Female MaleAllAll

MaleTabulation Category

Working Owner Hired Worker Other Worker Total

Female All Male Female

Female AllFemale All

Other Worker TotalAllFemale

Hired Worker

MaleMale

All

Table 11(RT) : Distribution of Employment by Type

RURAL - TOTAL




Table 11(UO) : Distribution of Employment by Type

URBAN - OAE




ST - 24

Male

FemaleMale

Hired Worker

Total

All

AllFemale

Male Female All

Male Female AllAll

Male Female All Male

Male FemaleAll



Female All

Tabulation Category

Working Owner TotalFemale

Other Worker

Table 11(UE) : Distribution of Employment by Type

URBAN - ESTT




Table 11(UT) : Distribution of Employment by Type

URBAN - TOTAL




ST - 25

Male

FemaleMaleAllFemaleMale

Tabulation Category

Working Owner Hired Worker

Total

AllMale FemaleAll



Male Female All Female AllFemale

Other Worker

All

TotalAll

Male Female Male Female All

Table 11(DO) : Distribution of Employment by Type

DELHI - OAE




Table 11(DE) : Distribution of Employment by Type

DELHI - ESTT




ST - 26

Working OwnerTabulation Category

Working OwnerTabulation Category

FemaleMaleAllFemaleMale

MaleAllFemaleMale

Hired Worker Other Worker Total

Male FemaleAll

Male Female All All

Hired Worker Other Worker Total

Male Female AllFemale All

Male Female All

Table 11(DT) : Distribution of Employment by Type

DELHI - TOTAL




ST - 27

Tabulation Category


AllFemale All

Male FemaleMale Female AllMale

Female All

Total

Male

TABLE 12(RO) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

RURAL - OAE

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


TABLE 12(RE) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

RURAL - ESTT

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


TABLE 12(RT) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

RURAL - TOTAL

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


Tabulation Category

No. of Enterprises by number of workers

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


ST - 28

TABLE 12(UO) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

URBAN - OAE

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


TABLE 12(UE) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

URBAN - ESTT

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


TABLE 12(UT) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

URBAN - TOTAL

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


ST - 29

TABLE 12(DO) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

DELHI - OAE

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


TABLE 12(DE) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

DELHI - ESTT

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


TABLE 12(DT) : Distribution of Enterprises by Employment size

DELHI - TOTAL

1 2 3 4 5 6-9 10-19 20-49 50 or More All


ST - 30

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 13(RO): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

RURAL - OAE

H1 0 0 0H2 90739440 155101740 64362300Sub Total (H) 90739440 155101740 64362300I1 0 0 0I2 102098604 172633860 70535256I3 12547980 67209816 54661836I4 70343100 89055144 18712044Sub Total (I) 184989684 328898820 143909136K 19389912 62063760 42673848M 2568360 11254548 8686188N 124344864 246082884 121738020O 15056628 48942984 33886356TOTAL 437088888 852344736 415255848

Table 13(RE): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

RURAL - ESTT


Table 13(RT): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

RURAL - Total


Gross Value AddedTotal Receipt

Total Operating Expenses (Incl.

Distributive Expenses)

Tabulation Category

Tabulation Category




Tabulation Category




ST - 31

Table 13(UO): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

URBAN - OAE


Table 13(UE): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

URBAN - ESTT


Table 13(UT): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

URBAN - Total


Tabulation Category




Tabulation Category



Tabulation Category




Gross Value AddedTotal Receipt

ST - 32

Table 13(DO): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

DELHI - OAE


Table 13(DE): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

DELHI - ESTT


Table 13(DT): Components of Annual Gross Value Added (Rs.)

DELHI - Total


ST - 33

Tabulation Category




Tabulation Category



Gross Value Added

Tabulation Category




Total Receipt

Table 14(RO): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

RURAL-OAE


Table 14(RE): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

RURAL-ESTT


Table 14(RT): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

RURAL-TOTAL


loan Amount Outstanding

(Rs.)Owned

Tabulation Category

Net addition to Fixed Assets

During Last 365 Days (Rs.)

Market Value of Assets (Rs.)

Tabulation Category



Hired

Tabulation Category



Hired

ST - 34

Owned


(Rs.)


Market Value of Assets (Rs.) loan Amount Outstanding

(Rs.)Owned

Hired

Table 14(UO): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

URBAN-OAE


Table 14(UE): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

URBAN-ESTT


Table 14(UT): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

URBAN-TOTAL


Tabulation Category



Hired

Market Value of Assets (Rs.)loan Amount Outstanding

(Rs.)Owned

ST - 35


(Rs.)Owned

Tabulation Category



Hired

Market Value of Assets (Rs.)loan Amount Outstanding

(Rs.)Owned

Tabulation Category



Hired


Table 14(DO): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

DELHI-OAE


Table 14(DE): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

DELHI-ESTT


Table 14(DT): Market Value of assets & Amount of Loan Outstanding

DELHI-TOTAL



(Rs.)Owned

Tabulation Category



Hired


Owned


(Rs.)

Tabulation Category



Hired



ST - 36


(Rs.)OwnedTabulation Category



Hired

Table 15(RO) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

RURAL - OAE


1 2 3 4 5 6 7H1 0 0 0 0 0 0H2 2735481 676341 1305343 175043 9937407 14829615I1 0 0 0 0 0 0I2 3177966 0 0 27954674 787029 31919669I3 3515515 878879 0 1116187 313617 5824198I4 33292891 8785250 11012257 0 3913324 57003722K 121955095 46431299 8953628 242381 17810731 195393134M 9577729 8738556 0 0 2145774 20462059N 53628178 17876059 2511476 3902861 30807243 108725817O 14107086 6922382 4295170 0 8696334 34020972TOTAL 241989941 90308766 28077874 33391146 74411459 468179186

Table 15(RE) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

RURAL - ESTT

Land Building Plant Transport Tools Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7

H1 0 0 0 0 0 0H2 10892659 3380285 245003 4000 5446875 19968822I1 1648237 824118 160823 164823 74170 2872171I2 0 0 0 8021754 27331 8049085I3 1000000 60000 700000 0 521862 2281862I4 3986411 1803660 1759943 2647408 2494065 12691487K 57511515 18671118 66526 5644059 11753270 93646488M 8800000 3020000 23284113 4282115 5360783 44747011N 227723 151816 293135 0 165545 838219O 1660987 507370 133404 0 9355431 11657192TOTAL 85727532 28418367 26642947 20764159 35199332 196752337

Table 15(RT) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

RURAL - TOTAL



ST - 37

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category

Tabulation Category



Table 15(UO) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

URBAN - OAE



Table 15(UE) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

URBAN - ESTT.



Table 15(UT) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

URBAN - TOTAL



ST - 38

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 15(DO) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

DELHI - OAE



Table 15(DE) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

DELHI - ESTT.



Table 15(DT) : Details of Market Value of Assets owned (Rs.)

DELHI - TOTAL


1 2 3 4 5 6 7H1 2009820803 915680838 83054973 120380038 294822265 3423758917H2 4987856275 1811987472 166239989 200232147 585145162 7751461045I1 7036826 3518413 160823 164823 128056 11008941I2 176276836 107070573 1286840 1582970565 30996863 1898601677I3 876918094 230064992 46137849 326109549 101675706 1580906190I4 2579469899 1173273703 546530112 81588500 401823351 4782685565K 11935212698 3561913941 1068774779 1102305607 1816163440 19484370465M 10192354695 3429155716 340127419 659250969 1375363743 15996252542N 6657960732 2216026459 815273236 574352141 638407707 10902020275O 3970260158 1466531062 377399765 225057412 499534710 6538783107TOTAL 43393167016 14915223169 3444985785 4872411751 5744061003 72369848724

ST - 39

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 16(RO): Growth Status of Enterprises

RURAL - OAE

Expanding Stagnant Contracting Not Applicable Total

1 2 3 4 5 6H1 0 0 0 0 0H2 0 863 490 28 1381I1 0 0 0 0 0I2 106 893 164 0 1163I3 53 1516 33 35 1637I4 0 234 128 357 719K 728 216 17 0 961M 70 233 6 0 309N 1073 1390 6 0 2469O 358 495 12 4 869TOTAL 2388 5840 856 424 9508

Table 16(RE): Growth Status of Enterprises

RURAL - ESTT



Table 16(RT): Growth Status of Enterprises

RURAL - TOTAL



ST - 40

Tabulation Category

Growth Status of Enterprises

Growth Status of EnterprisesTabulation Category

Tabulation Category


Table 16(UO): Growth Status of Enterprises

URBAN -OAE



Table 16(UE): Growth Status of Enterprises

URBAN - ESTT



Table 16(UT): Growth Status of Enterprises

URBAN - TOTAL



ST - 41

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 16(DO): Growth Status of Enterprises

DELHI -OAE



Table 16(DE): Growth Status of Enterprises

DELHI-ESTT



Table 16(DT): Growth Status of Enterprises

DELHI - COMBINED



ST - 42

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 17(RO) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

RURAL - OAE

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection

Power Cut Shortage of Capital

Mktg. of Products/S

ervices

Lack of Infrastructu

re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment

Competition from other

units

Non-availability of Labour

Labour Problems

Fuel Not Available or availabl

at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of

service charges/fees/credit

No Specific Problem Other total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16H1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0H2 0 0 686 0 0 108 0 479 0 0 0 0 108 0 1381I1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I2 0 0 565 0 0 0 492 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 1163I3 0 0 1498 0 0 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 53 0 1637I4 0 0 77 0 0 213 0 11 0 0 0 0 418 0 719K 0 0 95 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 830 0 961M 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 143 0 309N 0 0 377 0 0 358 0 122 0 0 0 0 1612 0 2469O 0 4 291 0 0 111 0 55 0 0 0 0 408 0 869TOTAL 0 4 3749 0 0 790 492 901 0 0 0 0 3572 0 9508

Table 17(RE) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

RURAL - ESTT

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




ST - 43

Nature of Problems Faced

Tabulation Category

Tabulation Category


Table 17(RT) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

RURAL - TOTAL

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




Table 17(UO) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

URBAN - OAE

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




ST - 44

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 17(UE) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

URBAN - ESTT

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




Table 17(UT) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

URBAN - TOTAL

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




ST - 45

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 17(DO) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

DELHI - OAE

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




Table 17(DE) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

DELHI - ESTT

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




ST - 46

Tabulation Category


Tabulation Category


Table 17(DT) : Distribution of Enterprises by Nature of Problems faced

DELHI - COMBINED

Non Availability

of Electricity

Connection


Mktg. of Products/S

ervices


re Facilities

Local Problems

Harrassment


units


Labour Problems


at exorbitant

prices

Non-recovery of




ST - 47

Tabulation Category


Table 18 : Miscellaneous Features of Enterprises

Yes No All Yes No All Yes No AllRuralOAE 6 9502 9508 8110 1398 9508 6 9502 9508ESTT. 0 1959 1959 1924 35 1959 2 1957 1959Combined 6 11461 11467 10034 1433 11467 8 11459 11467UrbanOAE 2223 157846 160069 150015 10054 160069 5248 154821 160069ESTT. 3704 69633 73337 66720 6617 73337 2431 70906 73337Combined 5927 227479 233406 216735 16671 233406 7679 225727 233406DelhiOAE 2229 167348 169577 158125 11452 169577 5254 164323 169577ESTT. 3704 71592 75296 68644 6652 75296 2433 72863 75296Combined 5933 238940 244873 226769 18104 244873 7687 237186 244873

ST - 48

ItemWhether Registered Whether Received AssistanceWhether Mixed Activity

A REPORT ON UNORGANISED SERVICE SECTOR IN DELHI

Documents