A programmatic approach to address transboundary water pollution The GEF Strategic Partnership for the Danube/Black Sea Emilia Battaglini, The World Bank GEF Focal Points Sub-regional Workshop – Belgrade April 1-2, 2008
Jan 04, 2016
A programmatic approach to address transboundary water pollution
The GEF Strategic Partnership for the Danube/Black Sea
Emilia Battaglini, The World Bank
GEF Focal Points Sub-regional Workshop – Belgrade April 1-2, 2008
“Dead zones”: coastal water quality and environmental degradation due to the disruption of the global nitrogen cycle and excessive loading of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution from agriculture, human sewage, and industry
Water is unusable with hazards to ecosystem and human health while communities lose theirsources of income and food from fisheries.
Shared Water Basin calls for Shared Water Basin calls for economic, policy, and management links among countries - critical for sustainable development in the region
Issues
The GEF Partnership Model
Policy reforms and priority investment projects identified by the Danube River
and Black Sea Regional Programsand supported by the EU
Danube Commission’s GEF UNDP
Regional Project
Black Sea Commission’s GEF UNDP
Regional Project
GEF/WB Investment
Fund for Nutrient Reduction
Objective: Pollution Control and Nutrient Reduction to the Danube River and Black Sea
Program covers all 17 countries of the Danube River - Black Sea basin over the period 2001 – 2010
Builds on more than 10 years of GEF support, from TDA to SAPs implementation
GEF catalyst with $95 million in grants leveraging World Bank loans, government, and other donor resources (1:4 ratio)
Pilot demonstrations through regional projects and 11 single-country investments for nutrient reduction in the agriculture, municipal sewage, industrial sectors and to trap nutrients in restored floodplains
Achievements - 1
Achievements - 2
Cost effective ways of reversing coastal dead zones with potential annual reductions of 15,645 tonnes of nitrogen and 5,050 tonnes of phosphorus.
Outcomes are favorable in terms of on-site effectiveness, multi-country cooperation even in times of armed conflict, and in terms of Black Sea recovery: improved water quality, less oxygen depletion, and improved biodiversity/fisheries to support local communities.
Nutrient emissions to the Danube have been substantially reduced over the last 15 years (nitrogen emissions have decreased by about 20% and phosphorus by almost 50%).
This has been reflected in the upper/middle reaches of the River, where nutrient concentrations clearly diminished during the early 2000s.
Achievements - 3
EU highlighted the Danube Programme as a model for transboundary waters governance in its report to the U.N. Commission on Sustainable Development in April 2005.
All countries and partners acknowledge the catalytic role of the pilot projects in focusing national awareness on the needed technology to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus pollution.
Ultimately, the GEF-funded actions in the Danube-Black Sea basin demonstrate how countries can work together to reduce land-based pollution and Dead Zones. GEF Partnership provides a strong model for reducing Dead Zones across the planet.
The cost of inaction is high; delaying action just costs more in the long run.
Achievements - 4