Page 1
A Process for Rational Prescribing
Roland Halil, BSc(Hon), BScPharm, ACPR, PharmDAssistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa
Clinical Pharmacist, Bruyere Academic Family Health [email protected]
Twitter: @RolandHalil
May 2015
Page 2
Adding Pharmacology to your Knowledge Base
(Pharmacology Informs Therapeutics)
Dr Roland Halil, BSc(Hon), BScPharm, ACPR, PharmD
Pharmacist, Bruyere Academic FHTAssistant Professor, Dept Family Medicine, U of Ottawa
March 2015
Page 3
Objectives
• To promote an efficient process for incorporating pharmacology into your body of knowledge
• To promote the creation of a “personal formulary” during your residency.
Page 4
Pharmacology
• Impossible to know during clerkship– Every drug in every specialty? Get real.
• Possible to know during residency!– Build your Personal Formulary
• Drugs that will be bread & butter during your career.
– How?
Page 5
Personal FormularyPharmacology
• Pick one drug per class to become the workhorse in your personal formulary.– Need help? Ask a Pharmacist:
• What is your favourite member of any drug class?• Why?
• Knows the in’s and out’s of that drug:– Learn its Pharmacology
• (Pharmacology = M.O.A. + PK + PD)
+– Dosing range, Cost / Drug coverage status, Dosage
forms available
Page 6
Learning PharmacologyOpen your
Drug Database Software (Eg. LexiComp,
Micromedex, eCPS, etc)
Review Mechanism
of Action
Review Pharmaco-Kinetics
• Clearance: Renal or Hepatic?• Hepatic:
CYP-450 or not?
Review Pharmaco-Dynamics(ie. Top 3 Side
Effects)• Rare &
Severe• Common &
Bothersome
Total: 3 min
Page 7
Pharmacology
• Learn the drugs that will be part of your personal formulary.
• Build your formulary wisely.• Brief, but regular, review will help you own it.
– Patients are treated more optimally– Fewer side effects– Less risk of litigation– Better use of health care dollars– Better likelihood of compliance
Page 8
Comments, Questions & Requests?
• [email protected] • Monday & Fridays:
– 613-230-7788 ext 238• Tuesday, Wednesday,
Thursday: – 613-241-3344 ext 327
• Twitter: @Roland Halil, PharmD
Page 9
A Process for Rational Prescribing
Roland Halil, BSc(Hon), BScPharm, ACPR, PharmDAssistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa
Clinical Pharmacist, Bruyere Academic Family Health [email protected]
Twitter: @RolandHalil
May 2015
Page 10
Objectives
1. Describe a process for choosing pharmacotherapy and prioritizing prescribing dilemmas
2. Highlight how such a process can save time and enhance comfort with applying evidence-based medicine to individual patients
3. Dispel marketing myths in pharmacotherapy
Page 11
Prescribing
Jaski M.E. et al. Effective Clinical Practice, MEDICATION REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION IN PHYSICIAN OFFICE PRACTICE. ACP Internal Medicine Jan/Feb 2000. http://www.acponline.org/journals/ecp/janfeb00/jaski.htm Accessed Nov 1/14.
“Two thirds of all physician office visits result in a Rx.”
“Patients are likely to visit several [providers] for a variety of conditions and thus are
likely to receive multiple prescriptions.“
“In addition to receiving prescribed drug therapies, patients are likely to "self-medicate" with over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, nutritional supplements, and herbal and other alternative remedies.”
Page 12
Therapy Dilemmas
To prescribe or not to prescribe? That is the question…
Page 13
Options
• First, lay out therapeutic options: – Drug A– Drug B– Drug C– Non-drug options D, E, & F– No treatment
• (always an option!)
Page 14
Thought StructureBased on what?
• Rational prescribing requires a process for selecting therapy:
Patient Preference
Direct to Consumer Advertising
Expert Opinion
Guidelines
Evidence Based Medicine
PubMed searches
Common Sense
Pharma Rep info
Monograph data
Page 15
Rational Prescribing
• Four steps to Rational Prescribing:1. EFFICACY
2. TOXICITY
3. COST
4. CONVENIENCE
Page 16
Step 1: Efficacy(How good is good?)
Page 17
EfficacyAsk yourself about…
1. Type of intervention:What will reduce:
1. Mortality based on hard outcomes
2. Morbidity 3. Surrogate markers based on soft outcomes
4. Symptoms
Page 18
Efficacy2. Quantity of evidence? ie. effect size
a) Absolute is more important than relative• Eg. 2% 1%
= 1% absolute risk reduction (i.e. 50% relative risk reduction)
b) Number-needed to treat (NNT) • The inverse of the ARR. (NNT = 100)(=1/0.01)• Useful for the shepherd (population health)
c) Converse is more clinically informative than inverse• Eg. Without treatment, 98% will be unaffected• With treatment, 99% will be unaffected• Useful for the flock (individual health)
Number Needed to Treat http://www.med.uottawa.ca/sim/data/Number_Needed_to_Treat_e.htm Accessed Nov 2/14
Page 19
Efficacy3. Quality of evidence? (Hierarchy of evidence)
Robert Yokl. Good Evidence: The Missing Link. Apr 08, 2013. http://valueanalysismag.com/good-evidence-the-missing-link/
Page 20
Efficacy4. Time to benefit?
– The fourth dimension!
Type
Quality
Quantity
Page 21
Efficacy
Therefore, the key is the prioritization of efficacy endpoints, evidence quality and time to benefit
Quantity (Effect Size) Quality
MortalityMorbiditySurrogate outcomesSymptomatic relief
Page 22
Efficacy• If there is no efficacy, why waste your time on
the potential toxicity, cost and inconvenience of a drug?
• If there is efficacy, it is proven in populations. Balance this against the potential toxicity to the individual.
Page 23
A simple example:
Metformin
VS
Sitagliptin (Januvia®)
)
Page 24
Efficacy
1. HARD Outcomes– Mortality benefit
» Metformin – per UKPDS-34 trial (RCT)– Morbidity benefit
» Metformin – reduction in microvascular complications
2. SURROGATE Outcomesa) Hgb-A1c Lowering Effects
a) Metformin ~ 1% - 2%b) Sitagliptin ~ 0.5% - 0.8%
b) Insulin Sparing Effectsa) Metformin
Page 25
Primum non nocere
• When EBM is strong: – Efficacy easily outweighs
Toxicity– Only very specific
contraindications to pursuing therapy
• When EBM is weak– It is easy for Toxicity to
outweigh Efficacy– First, do no harm
Page 26
Step 2: Toxicity(How bad is bad?)
Page 27
Toxicity
Like Efficacy, the key is prioritization of toxicity endpoints, effect size, evidence quality and time to
benefit.
• What will: 1. Kill me?2. Maim me?3. Make me feel crappy? (bothersome side effects)
• Size of toxic effect (Quantity)?• Evidence Quality to show effect?• Time to harm?
Page 28
Toxicity
Common Not legal
Rare Who cares
Bothersome Severe
Like
lihoo
d
Severity
Page 29
ToxicityTime: The 4th parameter
• Most drugs are approved based on their efficacy against nothing – (ie. placebo, not the current gold-standard)
• Studies are usually powered for efficacy, not toxicity – (eg. Phase III study)
• Tox data is accumulated over time – (eg. Phase IV, post-marketing surveillance study)– Slower than accumulation of efficacy data
• Time lag!
Page 30
ToxicityAge Before Beauty
Newer agents = Less Safety DataOlder agents = More Safety Data
Prexige
Arcoxia
Vioxx
Bextra
Zelnorm
Prepulsid
Meridia
Baycol
Actos
Avandia
Page 31
Toxicity4. Time to harm?
– Versus: time to benefit!
Type
Quality
Quantity
Page 32
Efficacy: a population-based parameter
Toxicity: an individual risk
Robust EBM • Eg. ACE-inh post MI
– Clear mortality benefit in secondary prevention as per many RCTs
– Patient A: K+ = 4.0 mmol/L– Patient B: K+ = 6.0 mmol/L
• Will both get an ACEinh?
Weak EBM• Eg. Anti-seizure meds
for migraine prophylaxis– Questionable reduction
in severity & frequency– Risk of:
• Hepatitis• blood dyscrasias• strong drug interactions
etc.
Page 33
Example: Choosing Anti-DepressantsSelection of therapy:
1. Efficacy: ~equivalent to CBT & with eachother
2. Therefore, choose based on potential toxicities!
– (pick your poison)– Meta-analyses show an
over-estimation of efficacy and an under-appreciation of toxicity.
Options• SSRI’s: (5-HT)
– Fluoxetine, sertraline, (es)citalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine
• SNRI’s: (5-HT & NE)
– (des)venlafaxine, duloxetine
• Mirtazapine (5-HT & NE)
• TCA’s: (5-HT & NE)
– Amitriptyline, nortriptyline, despramine, imipramine, clomipramine, doxepin
• Bupropion (DA)
• MAOi’s: (+++ types)
– Moclobemide (reversible)– Phenelzine (irreversible) etc. etc.
Ikhlaaq Ahmed et al. BMJ 2012;344:d7762 http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.d7762 Accesssed Nov 4/14John PA Ioannidis. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2008, 3:14 http://www.peh-med.com/content/3/1/14 Accessed Nov 4/14
Page 34
Toxicities• Anti-cholinergic effects
– Paroxetine – Mirtazipine – (des)Venlafaxine– TCAs:
• amitriptyline > nortriptyline > desipramine
• Sexual dysfunction– SSRIs (>30% !)– TCAs
• N.B. More serotonin = less libido
• More dopamine = more libido
• Sedation– TCAs– Fluvoxamine
• Paroxetine (lesser extent)
– Mirtazapine– (Trazodone)
• Activation– Fluoxetine– Bupropion– (des)Venlafaxine– Moclobemide
Page 35
Toxicities• GI side effects
– Nausea – SSRIs• ? 5-HT effect in visceral
insular cortex?
– Diarrhea – SSRIs • (esp. sertraline, fluoxetine,
paroxetine, duloxetine)
– Constipation - TCAs
• QTc prolongation (TdP)– TCA’s– Citalopram > 40mg/day– Escitalopram > 20mg/day
• Drug/Disease interactions & Drug/Drug interactions
– Moclobemide:• no dietary tyramine
restrictions • (unlike irrev MAOi’s!)
– Pharamacokinetic P450 interactions:
• Fewer with: (es)citalopram, mirtazapine, moclobemide, sertraline, (des)venlafaxine
Page 36
Anti-depressants
• Cost– All ~ $25 - $35 / month– Newest agents, without
generics cost more.• Bupropion XL
– ~$45/mo• Escitalopram
– ~$65/mo• Paroxetine CR
– ~$60/mo– Not covered in Ontario
• Desvenlafaxine– ~$85/mo– Not covered in Ontario
• Convenience– Most are Once Daily– Bupropion SR – BID
• (XL formulation is QD)
– Moclobemide - BID
Page 37
Step 3: Cost(Who pays the piper?)
Page 38
Cost ($) – Ask…
• Patient cost vs Societal cost
• Rx cost?• Provincial plan?• Private plan?
Page 39
A simple example: CostChoosing an ACEinh
• Efficacy: equivalent• Toxicity: equivalent• Cost: all cheap,
generic– Except: trandolapril
& perindopril• Convenience: all
once daily– Except: captopril TID
ACE INHIBITOR (ACEI) / ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR BLOCKER (ARB): Oct 2014 Comparison Chart http://www.rxfiles.ca.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/rxfiles/uploads/documents/members/CHT-HTN-ace-arb.pdf Accessed Nov 4/14
Page 40
Step 4: Convenience(How much work is this?)
Page 41
ConvenienceHow much work is this drug?
1. How often to take? – QD vs QID?
2. Special restrictions (eg. bisphosphonates)– PO vs SC/IV? – Home vs Office vs Hospital therapy?
3. Many potential interactions? (eg. Rifampin)
4. Special monitoring requirements? (eg. Warfarin)
Page 43
Summary
• Applying EBM requires a process– It distills out high quality information
• (Efficacy)– It protects patients from unnecessary harm (and
you from medico-legal harm!) • (Toxicity)
– It saves time • (Cost and Convenience)
• Everybody wins!
Page 44
Summary
• Practicing this process can be clunky at first. But with practice:– You will internalize this process– You will get faster– You will prescribe with greater confidence– You will sleep better at night
• …and that is priceless!
Page 45
Questions?
Roland Halil, BSc(Hon), BScPharm, ACPR, PharmDAssistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa
Clinical Pharmacist, Bruyere Academic Family Health [email protected]
Twitter: @RolandHalilNov 22, 2014
Page 46
Workshop: Application of a Process for
Rational Prescribing
Roland Halil, BSc(Hon), BScPharm, ACPR, PharmDAssistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa
Clinical Pharmacist, Bruyere Academic Family Health [email protected]
Twitter: @RolandHalilMay 2015
Page 47
Objectives
1. Apply a process for choosing therapy to a selection of cases requiring pharmacotherapy
2. Describe how this process can improve outcomes as well as save time, energy and money
3. Reflect on how this process can be incorporated into your daily practice
Page 48
EfficacyPopulation average
ToxicityIndividual risk
Cost & ConvenienceEffort to obtain benefit or avoid harm
Prioritize: • Type of harm• Quantity of harm• Quality of evidence• Time to harm
Prioritize: • Type of benefit• Quantity of benefit • Quality of evidence• Time to benefit
Rational Prescribing Needs a Process to Provide Structure
Page 49
Case 1
• Ms. B.Mo., 58 y.o. hypertensive patient with PMHx of OA and dependent edema– BP: 155/95, HR: 85– CrCL 75mL/min; lytes N– On fixed income– Meds:
• Acetaminophen 500mg BID
Options?
Page 50
Options
1. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)2. ACE inhibitor3. Beta-Blocker4. Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB)5. Diuretic – Thiazide
Page 51
Case 1b• Four years later, now 62 y.o., Ms BMo’s
pressure is lower, but still not controlled. She has developed Stage 1-2 CKD
• Currently on Chlorthalidone 12.5mg qam– BP: 150/90, HR 85
• CrCL ~ 50ml/min • urACR 3.5
– Labs nl, still some pedal edema
Options?
Page 52
Options
1. Alpha Blocker2. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)3. ACE inhibitor4. Beta-Blocker5. Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB) – DHP
Page 53
Case 1c• Three years later, MS. BMo’s (now 65 y.o.)
develops CHF. She has both pulmonary and worsening pedal edema. – Meds:
• Chlorthalidone 12.5mg qam • Ramipril 5mg daily
– ECHO: LVEF 25%– BP 145/88, HR 85 – CrCL 35mL/min, lytes nl
Options?
Page 54
Options
1. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)2. Beta-Blocker3. Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB)4. Hydralazine & Nitroglycerin (long acting)5. Furosemide
Page 55
Case 2• Mr TD is a 68 year old gentleman with a history
of NSTEMI and CKD. He isn’t sure about “all these pills” and complains of OA and leg cramps
• eGFR ~ 40mL/min; BP: 125/75; HR: 65 bpm• On:
– Ramipril 5mg qd– Bisoprolol 5mg qd– ASA 81mg po qd– Atorvastatin 40mg qd
• His most recent lipid profile shows LDL = 2.8
Options?
Page 56
Options
• Statins• Fibrates• Ezetimibe• Niacin• Bile acid sequestrants• Non-pharm modalities
Page 57
Case 3• Mr RBC is a 55 year old gentleman with multiple
gout attacks and a history of a narcotic abuse. He has had terrible diarrhea with low dose colchicine and a previous psychotic episode with prednisone.
• eGFR ~ 90mL/min; BP: 130/78; UA = 450• On:
– Acetaminophen 1g QID – Allopurinol 100mg qd (with slow titration to target
UA < 360)Options?
Page 58
NSAIDs1. Efficacy – equivalent at equipotent doses2. Toxicity –
– Renal – equivalent risk– GI – dose and duration dependent
• Higher with some NSAIDs (eg. Ketorolac)– CV - COX-2 inhibitors > NSAIDs
• AVOID COX-2 inh.• Higher risk with Diclofenac
– Other COX-2 weighted NSAIDs (eg. Meloxicam?)• ?Safer with Naproxen / Ibuprofen?
– Safer with lower doses?
3. Cost – cheap & generic! 4. Convenience
– Naproxen for BID convenience– Ibuprofen for short half-life (eg. Gout tx)
• (Fast in, fast out)
Page 59
Questions?
Roland Halil, BSc(Hon), BScPharm, ACPR, PharmDAssistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa
Clinical Pharmacist, Bruyere Academic Family Health [email protected]
Twitter: @RolandHalil