Top Banner
A New Rationale and Treatment Model for Neuromuscular Tender Points Brian Tuckey PT, Jay P. Shah MD, Hannah Tandon BA © 2017 Tuckey Continuing Education Services LLC
37

A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Feb 08, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

ANewRationaleandTreatmentModelfor

NeuromuscularTenderPoints

BrianTuckeyPT,JayP.ShahMD,HannahTandonBA

©2017TuckeyContinuingEducationServicesLLC

Page 2: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Abstract

ThispaperpresentsanovelexpansionoftheosteopathictechniqueofStrain

andCounterstrain(SCS),originallydevelopedbyLawrenceJones,DO.WhileSCS

focusesonexaminingandtreatingthemusculoskeletalsystem,FascialCounterstrain

(CS),presentedhere,providesatreatmentandpathophysiologicalmodelthat

integratesallsystemsofthebodyintoJones’sconceptofneuromusculardysfunction.

InCS,TPs(includingtraditionalSCSTPs)areidentifiedandtreatedwithspecialized

fascialglidestargetedtolocalnociceptorsandmechanoreceptorsinsteadof

traditionalJonespositionsofcomfort.Additionally,thismodeloutlinesaprocessto

identifytreatmentsforpreviouslyundescribedneuromuscularTPs,twoofwhichare

describedinthepaper.Thesenewly-developedtreatmentshavebeenempirically

validatedthroughyearsofsuccessfulpatientoutcomesinavarietyofpatient

populations.

AphysiologicalrationalefortheCStreatmentmodelispresentedthat

incorporatesconceptsofcentralprocessingandthescienceoffascia.Neuronslocated

inthedeepfasciahavebothnociceptiveandmechanoreceptivepropertiesand

respondtolowthresholdpressurechanges.Repeatedperipheralnociceptiveinput

fromthefasciaintothecentralnervoussystemcancauseaprolongedorongoing

increaseinnociceptivepathwayexcitation,resultingincentralsensitization.This,

combinedwithsubsequentexcitationofperipheralnociceptors,caneffectivelycreate

system-specificTPs.CStreatmentsdecompresseslocalnociceptorsand

mechanoreceptors,mechanicallydeactivatingthem.Thisreducesperipheral

Page 3: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

nociceptiveinputtothespinalcord,revertingcentralprocessingbacktoitsnormal,

non-excitedstate.

TheCScasestudypresentedisthatofcalcificshouldertendonitiswhichfailed

torespondadequatelytoarthroscopicsub-acromialdecompressionanda6-week

standardcourseofpost-operativerehabilitation.Thepatientwassubsequently

referredforatrialofCSinanattempttoavoidcalcificnoduleresectionandcomplete

rotatorcuffrepair.FollowingCStreatment,thepatientregainedfullstrength,full

rangeofmotion,andreportedsignificantpainrelief.Additionally,x-rayevidence

demonstrated100%reabsorptionofthecalcificnoduleinatimeframethatis92%

fasterthanaveragereabsorptiontimewithstandardtreatment.Thesepromisingcase

resultsandtheassociatedphysiologicalrationalesuggestthatCSprovidesaneffective

andtargetedmulti-systemtreatmentwhichmeritsfurtherstudy.

Page 4: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

INTRODUCTION

FascialCounterstrainisamodern,expandedversionoftheosteopathictechnique

StrainandCounterstraininwhichallsystemsofthehumanbodyareassessedand

treated,notjustthemusculoskeletalsystem.Anewexplanationof

fascial/neuromusculartenderpointsispresentedthatutilizesthemodernconceptsof

centralprocessingandtheemergingscienceoffasciaasacontractilesensoryorgan.

Wesuggestthatthebodyprotectsalltissues,notjustmusculoskeletalstructures,via

nocifensivereflexesorchestratedbythefascialsystem.AFascialCounterstraincase

studyispresentedtodemonstratetheconceptofmulti-systemfascialmanipulation

anditspotentialimpactonamyriadofmusculoskeletalandnon-musculoskeletal

medicalconditions.

BACKGROUND

StrainandCounterstrain(SCS),alsoknownasPositionalRelease,isapassive

positionaltechniquedevelopedbyLawrenceJones,DO,aimedatrelieving

musculoskeletal(MS)andfascialpainthroughtheuseofindirect(non-painful,reflex-

based)manualmanipulation(D'Ambrogio&Roth1997).SCSisacommonformof

softtissuemanipulationpracticedbyosteopathicphysicians,physicaltherapists,and

othermanualmedicinepractitionersworldwide(Johnson&Kurtz2003;Saphyetal.

2016).

SCShasmultipleclinicalindicationsandhasbeenutilizedtotreatdisorders

involvingpain,edema,jointhypo-mobility,skeletalmuscletension,muscleweakness,

andfascialtension(Chaitow2007;D'Ambrogio&Roth1997;Wong2012).Initially,

Page 5: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

tenderpoints(TPs)areidentifiedtodiagnoseneuromusculardysfunctionandare

monitoredoverthecourseoftreatmenttoassessclinicalprogress.Physically,TPs

weredescribedbyJonesas‘tense,tender,edematousmassesabout1cmindiameter’

andhavebeendocumentedinbothmuscularandfasciallocations(Chaitow2007;

D'Ambrogio&Roth1997;Jones1995).AfteradiagnosticTPisidentified,patients

arepassivelyplacedintospecifiedpositionsforupto90secondstoreleasetheTP

(Chaitow2007;D'Ambrogio&Roth1997;Jones1995;Wong2012).Intheclassic

SCSmodel,nodistinctionismadebetweenTPsandmyofascialtriggerpoints(Trps),

butadiscussionofhowtheyarerelatedwillbegivenlaterintheframeworkofthe

proposedCSmodel.

TheproposedphysiologicalmechanismsbehindSCSaretheoretical.

Historically,theproprioceptiveorKorrhypothesisofjointdysfunctionhasbeen

utilizedtoexplaintheeffectsofSCS(Wong2012).Inthistheory,aberrant

neuromuscularreflexescausedbydysfunctionalmusclespindlesleadtojointfixation

anddysfunction(Korr1975).Throughpassivepositioning,SCSisbelievedtoreset

thedysfunctionalproprioceptorstobaselinesensitivity,normalizingthestretchreflex

andrestoringpain-freefunctiontotheinvolvedjoint.

In1990,VanBuskirkquestionedthevalidityoftheproprioceptivemodel(Van

Buskirk1990).Hearguedthatmusclespindleactivityaloneisneithernecessarynor

typicallysufficienttoproduceisolatedskeletalmusclecontractionandthatother

tissueproprioceptorsexist,suchasnociceptorsthatcancauseasimilarclinical

presentation.Hearguedforanociceptivemodelthatcouldaccountforthefactthat

Page 6: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

jointdysfunctionisknowntobecausedbynon-musculartissuesliketheviscera,

whichdonotcontainmusclespindles.In2005,theVanBuskirknociceptivemodel

wasupdatedtoincludenewresearchrelatedtotheexcitationofsegmentaldorsal

rootreflexesandthepotentialforpainmodulationfromdescendingCentralNervous

System(CNS)pathways(Howell&Willard2005).

ThescopeofSCStreatmenthasbeenexpandedoverthelast20yearsbythe

leadauthor,BrianTuckeyPT,OCS,(BT)adiscipleofJones.Oneofonlyfourphysical

therapiststobecertifiedtoteachSCSbyJones,BThasidentifiedover500previously

undocumentedneuromuscularTPs,asignificantnumberofwhichrequire

manipulationofnon-muscularstructuresinordertoalleviatetheclinicalsignsand

symptoms.WhilethesenewlyidentifiedTPsarelocatedinsurfacemuscleorfascial

tissues,manipulativeforcesaretypicallyappliedtounderlyinganatomicaltissues

includingthevisceralfascia(peritoneum),vascularfascia(tunicaadventitia),

ligamentsandallaspectsofthenervoussystem(epineurium).Thisnew,multi-system

formofSCSiscalledFascialCounterstrainorsimplyCounterstrain(CS)(Saphyetal.

2016;Tuckey2008,2011,2013,2014,2015a,b,c).CSTPsarebelievedtoimpactthe

functionofthespecificsystemstowhichtheyrelatethroughreflexiveconnectionsto

theCNS.Atheoreticalphysiologicalrationaleisofferedtoexplaintheeffectsofthis

newformofSCS,onethattakesintoconsiderationthemodernconceptsofcentral

sensitizationandtheexpandingroleoffasciaasasensoryorgan.

MATERIALSANDMETHODS

Page 7: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

CStreatmentdiffersfromclassicSCStreatmentsdescribedbyJonesinthat

fascialglides,nottreatmentpositions,areutilizedtofacilitatearelease(Jones1995;

Tuckey2015c).ThefollowingsequencedetailsthestepsinvolvedinaCSTPrelease.

Thespecificphysiologicalchangesdescribedineachstepwillbediscussedlaterinthe

manuscript.

1) AdiagnosticTPisidentified.

2) Afascialglideorjointmovementisperformedthatunloadstheinvolved

structure.Thismanipulationisperformedtothespecifictissuethathasbeen

clinicallyidentifiedtoreleasetheTP.ThestructuremanipulatedmaybeMS,

visceral,neural,orvascularinorigin.

3) Thistissue-specificmanipulationdecompresseslocalnociceptorsand

mechanoreceptors,mechanicallydeactivatingthem.

4) Thetreatmentordecompressedpositionismaintainedfor15-45seconds.This

allowsanynoxioussubstancesinthesurroundingareatodissipate,alleviating

chemicalirritationoftheinvolvedperipheralnociceptors.

5) ThetechniqueisrepeatedtootherTPslocatedinthetargetedregion/limb/etc.

Thisreducesperipheralfascialnociceptiveinputtothespinalcord,reverting

centralprocessingbacktoitsnormal,non-excitedstate.

6) Fascialtonusisreducedandnocifensivereflexesarereturnedtonormal,

resolvingtissuetextureabnormalitiesandrestoringpain-freemobilitytothe

involvedstructures.

Page 8: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

7) Sympatheticactivationisreducedascentralprocessingnormalizes,reducing

ischemiaandedemainthevascularbed.

8) Thepatientisre-assessedtoverifyresolutionoftheinvolvedTPsandtoassess

improvementsinpain,mobility,edema,function,etc.

Extensivemanipulativeexperienceandanatomicalknowledgeisrequiredto

identifyTPsnotpreviouslydescribedinSCS.InadditiontotrainingunderJones,the

author(BT)studiedmultipleformsofmanipulationovera26-yearperiodtogain

proficiencyinjointmobilitytestingandtheabilitytodifferentiate,usingpalpation,

betweendifferentsofttissuetypes(e.g.muscularvs.visceraltissues.)Thefollowing

sequencedetailsthegeneralempiricalmethodutilizedbyBTtoidentifyandname

newCSTPs.

(1) ThepatientisassessedandgivenCStreatmenttoallSCSTPspresent.

(2) Ifsymptomspersist,jointmotiontestingandtissuetextureabnormalitiesare

usedtoidentifyadditionalTPsnotpreviouslydescribedinSCS.

(3) IfaTPisidentified,regionaltissuesincludinglocalskeletalmuscle,ligaments,

neuro-vascularstructures,andtheunderlyingvisceraaremanipulatedina3-

dimensionalmanneruntilageneralvector(depth,directionandtissue

location)isidentifiedthatalleviatestheTP.Thismanipulationorglideisheld

for15-45secondsdependingontheseverityoftheTP.

(4) Followingasuccessfulrelease,thepatientisassessedtoidentify

improvementsorchangesinmobility,pain,digestion,sensation,strength,

balance,and/orotherobjective/subjectivefindings.

Page 9: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

(5) AdditionalTPexaminationsandtreatmentsessionsareperformeduntilthe

patientreachesmaximumbenefitorthesymptomshavefullyresolved.The

reductioninperipheralnociceptionfollowingCStreatmentmayallowthe

associatedmaladaptiveCNSplasticitytonormalize,eveninsupraspinal

structureslikethethalamusorlimbicsystem.

TovalidateanewlyidentifiedTP,additionalpatientsareexaminedandtreated

untiltheexactvectorisverifiedthatconsistentlyresultsinalastingrelease.Thenew

TPisnamedbasedontheanatomicalstructurethatmaymatchtheTP’s3-

dimensionalvector.Wheneverpossible,thesuspectedanatomicalstructure(notjust

thesurfacediagnosticTP)ispalpatedfortissuetexturechangesbeforeandafter

treatmenttoverifytheassociation.Treatmentresponseandsymptomsareanalyzed

overtimetoconfirmthesuspectedanatomicalstructure.Forexample,anewly

identifiedTPisconfirmedtoberelatedtotheulnarnervewhentreatmentresolves

painandparesthesiasexperiencedinthe4thand5thdigits.

THEORETICALRATIONALEFOR‘FASCIAL’COUNTERSTRAIN

CSintegratesfasciaintotheSCSmodel.Therearetwotypesoffascia:

superficialanddeep.Superficialfascialiesbeneaththeskinandplaysarolein

thermoregulationandskinturgorandishighlyinnervated.Deepfascia,ontheother

hand,linesmusclegroupsandorgansandhaslongbeencalledthe‘organofform’

becauseofitsroleinofferingstructureandformtothehumanbody(Garfinetal.

1981).

Page 10: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Recentresearchhasdemonstratedthatdeepfasciaservesmorethana

structuralpurpose.Alltypesofdeepfascia,includingtunicaadventitia,peritoneum,

epineurium,andmyofascia(muscularfascia),havebeenshowntohaveextensive

proprioceptivepropertiesduetoTypeIIIandIVneurons(Feindeletal.1948;Mitchell

&Schmidt2011;Ruch1979;Schleip2003;Stacey1969;Stilwell1957a,b).These

neurons,rarelymentionedinphysiologicaltextbooks,arethepredominanttypesof

freenerveendingsindeepfascia.Thereceptorshavebothnociceptive(painsensing)

andmechanoreceptive(movementsensing)propertiesandrespondtoevenlow

thresholdpressurechangessuchaslighttouch(Mitchell&Schmidt2011).Thepain

experiencedthroughexcitationoffascialnociceptorsisvariableandcanrangefrom

dulltosharpandfromlocalizedtodiffuse(Geldard1974;Landau&Bishop1953).

Becausethedeepfasciaiseffectivelytheouterlayerofalltissues,ithasbeencalled

the“largestsensoryorgan”inthehumanbody(Schleip2003).Ingeneral,nociceptors

canbestimulatedbymechanical,chemical,orthermalmechanismsincludingpostural

strain,diseasestates,physicaltrauma,and/orinflammation(Mitchell&Schmidt

2011;Mountcastle1980;Schleip2003).Oncestimulated,peripheralnociceptorssend

signalstothespinalcord,activatingsecondaryneuronsthateventuallyascendinto

thepainperceivingregionsofthebrain(Fryer2016;Woolf2011).Thedorsalroot

ganglionneuronssubsequentlyreleaseinflammatorychemicalslikesubstanceP,

bradykinin,andcalcitoningene-relatedpeptide(CGRP)backintotheperipheral

tissuesviaantidromicnerveconduction.This‘dumping’effectofinflammatory

mediatorsbackintotheperipheryexacerbatestheexistingperipheralinflammatory

Page 11: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

responsecausinghyperalgesia(abnormallyheightenedsensitivitytoanoxious

stimulus)(Willisetal.1998).

Nociceptoractivationmaystimulatetheautonomicnervoussystem.Themost

commoneffectofthisisanelevationinsympathetictoneorsympatheticnervous

systemactivation(SNA).Atthespinalcord,interneuronsandevensomeofthe

peripheralnociceptors'afferentsprojecttothepreganglionicneuronsoftheinter-

mediolateralcolumnproducingautonomiceffectsincludingvasopressor/vasodilator

effects,gastrointestinalstasis,andevenalterationsinimmunefunction(Benarroch

2006;Cortelli&Pierangeli2003;Foremanetal.1984;Irvinetal.1970;Johansson

1962;Mitchell&Schmidt2011;Purslow2010;Satoetal.1979).Othersomaticand/

orvisceralafferentsprojecttothemotorneuronsoftheventralhorn,drivingMS

protectivereflexescallednocifensivereflexes.SomeoftheseMSreflexesarelocal

whileothersaremulti-segmentalcontractionsthatthebodyutilizestominimize

noxioussensationswhichcanmanifestclinicallyaspain,limitedmobility,even

posturalasymmetry(Howell&Willard2005;Megirian1962).Inaddition,visceral

andsomaticafferentnervesareknowntoconvergeintothesameneuronsatboththe

spinalcord(dorsalhorn)andmidbrain(ventrolateralperiaqueductalgray)level.

ThesesharedvisceralandMSnocifensiveresponsesareknownasviscero-somaticor

somato-visceralreflexesandmustbeconsideredwhenevaluatingpatientswithorgan

and/orsomaticcomplaints(Cameronetal.2008;Foremanetal.1984).

SNAhasbeenshowntocauseongoingarterialvasoconstrictionandisknown

tobespinal-segmentspecificandthereforeorganspecific(Hijmeringetal.2002;

Page 12: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Malpas2010).Thesubsequentdisruptionofcirculationhasbeenassociatedwith

renalfailure,hypertension,andheartdisease(Malpas2010).Ongoingsympathetic

activationmayalsocauseadecreaseincirculationtomuscletissue,thelongterm

effectsofwhichwouldlogicallyleadtotrophicchangessuchasmusclefiberandor

tendondegeneration(Janig&Habler1995).

Furthermore,secondordernoci-responsiveneuronsinthespinalcordcanbe

stimulatedwhichascendviathespinothalamicandspinocervicothalamictractstothe

brainstemandthalamus(AbAziz&Ahmad2006).TheimpactontheCNScan

manifestassecondaryhyperalgesia(painlocatedoutsidetheprimaryareaofinjury)

andevenallodynia(paintoanon-noxiousstimulus)(Ruch1979;Woolf2011).This

conceptofcentralsensitization,whererepeatedperipheralnociceptiveinputintothe

CNScausesaprolongedorongoingincreaseinnociceptivepathwayexcitation,isa

well-establishedphenomenonwhichcansetupapositivefeedbackloopbetween

centralandperipheralnociceptors.Thisloopfostersthedevelopmentofchronicpain

conditionsincludingfibromyalgia,temporomandibulardysfunction,andvisceralpain

syndromes(Fryer2016;Woolf2011).

Additionalsupraspinalinfluencessuchasincreasedlimbicsystemactivitycan

alsooccurincasesofmyofascialpainsyndrome(MPS).Niddametal.demonstrated

increasedlimbicsystem(i.e.,anteriorinsula)activityinpatientswithuppertrapezius

MPSwhichcanaffectpainmodulationandpotentiallycausepsychologicalsymptoms

suchasfearandanxiety(Niddametal.2007).

Page 13: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Centralsensitizationandsubsequentexcitationofperipheralnociceptors

manifestsclinicallyaspressurehyperalgesia,whichlowerstissuepressurepain

thresholds,effectivelycreatingTPs(Woolf2011).Manyformsofosteopathic

diagnosishavebeenshowntohavepoorreliability;however,researchhas

demonstratedacceptableinter-examinerreliabilityusingtissuepalpationasa

diagnosticcriterionthussupportingtheuseofTPexaminationoverotherformsof

manualdiagnosessuchassegmentalmotiontesting(Seffingeretal.2004).

IntheCSapproach,TPsaretheprimaryfindingbywhichadiagnosisismade.

TheconceptofCSTPs(bydefinitiontense,tender,edematousmasses)accurately

describesthepresenceoftissueedemaaswellaslocalizedpressurehyperalgesia.

Thus,theclinicalsignsandsymptomsoftheCSTPcanbereasonablyaccountedforby

utilizingthemodernconceptsofcentrallystimulatednociceptors.Sincenociceptors

fromalltissuetypescanexciteinterneuronsatthespinalcordlevel,differentsystems

couldbeinjuredorinflamedandactastheprimarypainsourceorprimary

hyperalgesialocation.SecondaryhyperalgesiacanthereforeexistinsurfaceMS

locationsdespiteoriginatingfromacompletelydifferentinnervatedtissuesource

suchasavascularorvisceralstructure(Fryer2016;Meyeretal.2005).Oncecreated,

TPscanbemaintainedbycentralmechanismsincludingspinalplasticity(maladaptive

re-organizationofspinalcordneurons)orbycontinuedperipheralnociceptiveinput

aspatientscontinuetofunctioninthepresenceofactivatedorsymptomaticTPs

(Woolf&Salter2000).

Page 14: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Inadditiontothepresenceofnociceptorsandmechanoreceptors,researchhas

demonstratedthatfasciahasintrinsiccontractilepropertiesduethepresenceof

myofibroblasts(Purslow2010;Schleip2003).Schleipetal.(2005)measuredthe

forceofperimysialintermuscularfasciaandfoundittobesufficienttoimpact

musculoskeletalbehaviorand/orgammamotorneuronactivityaroundaninvolved

joint.Theabilityofdeepfasciatocontractmayhelpexplainthelastcharacteristicof

CStenderpoints:‘tissuetexturechange’orthefactthattenderpointsarepalpable,

eveninanatomicallyneutralpositions.Inthepast,paraspinaltissuetexturechanges

intheregionofpainhavebeenattributedtoreflexskeletalmusclecontraction,

however,morerecentstudieshavenotdemonstratedrestingEMGactivityatthe

locationoftissuechange,callingintoquestiontheideaofongoing,localizedalpha

motorneuronexcitation(Fryer2016).Aplausibleexplanationforalocalizedincrease

inpalpablemuscleand/orfascialtoneatrest,wouldbethatpractitionersareableto

perceivenotonlylocalizededemabutalsocontractedfasciarelatedtotheperipheral

orcentralexcitationoffascialnociceptors.Consideringthatperimysialfascia

contributestothepressureinsideamusclethroughitsstructural,physiological,and

metabolicproperties,itisconceivablethatperimysialfascialcontractioncouldcausea

clinicallyrecognizableincreaseinmuscletonus(Garfinetal.1981).

TheEffectofReducingofperipheralNociceptiveInputonCentralSensitization

In1992,Cohenetal.coinedtheterm‘refractorycervicobrachialpain’(RCBP)

afterobservingan‘epidemic’ofcasesinvolvingpatientswiththeclinicalfeaturesof

neuropathicpain(paininitiatedorcausedbyaprimarylesionordysfunctioninthe

Page 15: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

nervoussystem)butinwhomnoradiculopathy,peripheralneuropathy,arthropathy,

ormyopathycouldbeidentified.Thesepatientspresentedwithallodynia,painon

jointmovement,cutaneoushypoaesthesia,andimpairedmotorfunction.Several

patientswhopresentedwithautonomicsymptoms,alsoreceivedsympathetic

(stellateganglion)blockswithoutconsistentresolutionofpainsymptoms,rulingout

sympatheticallymediatedpainastheprimarycause.Multiplesitesofanalgesic

and/orsympatheticblocks,however,werefoundtosignificantlyreducetheoverall

painpresentation.Thus,itwasconcludedthatRCBPisduetorepeatedperipheral

afferentnociceptiveinputfromanumberofpossibletissuesourcesincluding

capsular,muscular,and/orneuralstructuresresultingindorsalhornexcitation

(Cohenetal.1992).Thisconceptofreversingcentralsensitizationbyreducingthe

afferentbarrageofperipheralnociceptiveinputhasbeenexperimentallyand

theoreticallysupportedbyotherauthors.Graceyetal.(1992)performedlocal

anestheticblocksof‘painfulfoci’associatedwithprevioustrauma(essentially

blockingTPs)whichabolishedmechano-allodynia,coldallodynia,andspontaneous

paininallpatientsandrelievedthemotorsymptomsinonepatientwithtonic

contracturesofthetoes.Thesymptomsgraduallyreturnedastheanestheticwaned,

demonstratingthatperipheralnociceptioncandrivecentralsensitizationandis

apparentlyreversible.Insummary,Graceyconcluded:

‘Weproposeamodelofneuropathicpaininwhichongoingnociceptive

afferentinputfromaperipheralfocusdynamicallymaintainsalteredcentral

processingthataccountsforallodynia,spontaneouspain,andothersensoryand

Page 16: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

motorabnormalities.Blockingtheperipheralinputcausesthecentralprocessingto

reverttonormal,abolishingthesymptomsforthedurationoftheblock.Themodel

accountsforsympatheticallymaintained(SMP)andsympatheticallyindependent

(SIP)pain.’(Gracelyetal.1992)

Althoughtheexactmechanismbywhichalteredcentralprocessingis

maintainedisstilldebated,Gracey’sfindingssuggestthattreatmentofperipheral

nociceptivesourcescanreversetheprocess.Hisresearchalsosupportstheconcept

thatcentralsensitizationcannotexistwithoutongoingnociceptiveinput.This

supportstheCSmulti-systemmodelthatutilizesthetreatmentofTPstoreducethe

numberofnociceptivesourcesintheperipheryandthusreducetheamountof

disabilityandpainexperiencedbypatientsduringactivitiesofdailyliving.

IntheliteraturethereisadistinctionmadebetweenfascialTPsandmyofascial

triggerpoints(Trps).TPsaredescribedasnon-specificsofttissuelocationsof

hyperalgesiathatdonotrespondtolocaltreatmentsandareoftenassociatedwith

widespreadpainsyndromeslikefibromyalgia(Schneider1995).Ontheotherhand,

Trpsarehard,palpable,tendernoduleslocatedinatautbandofskeletalmusclethat

havehistoricallyrespondedwelltolocaltreatments.Trpscanbeclassifiedaseither

activeorlatent.AnactiveTrpisassociatedwithspontaneouspain,andstrongdigital

pressureontheactiveTrpexacerbatesthepatient'sfamiliarpainexperience.Latent

Trps,ontheotherhand,arenotassociatedwithaspontaneouspaincomplaint;

however,pressureelicitspainlocallyatthesiteofthenodule.BothkindsofTrpscan

beassociatedwithmuscledysfunctionandweaknessandlimitedrangeofmotion.

Page 17: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

ActiveTrpshaveelevatedlevelsofsubstancesknowntobeassociatedwithpain,

inflammation,sensitization,andintercellularsignalingascomparedtohealthy

skeletalmuscletissue(Shah&Gilliams2008).Thesebiochemicalsinclude

inflammatorymediators,neuropeptides,catecholamines,andcytokines.Thissupports

theconceptofactiveTrpsbeingareasofprimaryhyperalgesiacapableofinitiatingthe

processofcentralsensitization.

ItisimportanttonotethatinCS,thereisnodistinctionmadebetweenTPand

Trps.AllTrpsandTPscanbetreatedsuccessfullywithCSmanipulation.Whileinthe

literatureTrpsareoftendescribedsolelyintermsofmyofascia,CSconsidersa

potentialprotectiverelationshipofTrpswithunderlyingvisceral,vascular,andneural

tissuesrelatedtonocifensivereflexarcs.WhethertheyarepurelyMSorrelateto

anothersystemthroughthesereflexarcs,Trpsaremonitoredandreleasedinthe

samefashionasaTPfoundonabonylandmark.ThismeansinCS,Trpsare

essentiallyconsideredasubsetofTPs.ThereforeidentificationandnamingofaTrpin

CSfollowsthesameprotocolasthatforanyTP.

BecauseCSpractitionersdonotdistinguishTrpsfromthelargercategoryof

TPsforpurposesofassessmentandtreatment,fortheremainderofthisdiscussion,

‘TPs’willbeusedtodescribeallfocalareasoftissuetextureabnormalityincluding

thosethatcouldalsobedefinedasTrps.Forexample,Figure1illustratesaTP(which

inthiscase,fitsthedefinitionofaTrp)locatedintheproximalportionofthereflected

headoftherectusfemorismuscle.ThisTPempiricallyhasbeenfoundtonotrespond

tomanipulationofthequadricepshoweverdoesreleaseinresponsetoafascialglide

Page 18: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

appliedtotheipsilateralileumandassociatedperitonealfascia.ThustheTPhasbeen

named‘ileum’insteadof‘rectusfemoris’(indicatingvisceral,notMSorigin).

(a) (b)

(b)

Page 19: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Figure1

RATIONALEFORMULTI-SYSTEMTPFORMATION

ThefollowingsequencedetailstheproposedmechanismofTPformationafter

recognizingfasciaasadynamic,multi-systemsensoryorganandincorporatingthe

conceptsofcentralsensitization.Thismodelisessentiallyanexpandedversionofthe

‘nociceptive’modelproposedbyVanBuskirkin1990:

1) Trauma,inflammation,posturalstrain,ordiseasestimulatesTypeIIIandType

IVfascialnociceptorsand/ormechanoreceptors.Theprimarynociceptive

tissuecanbemusculoskeletal,visceral,vascular,orneural.

2) Stimulatedperipheralnociceptorsactivateneuronsinthedorsalrootganglia

anddorsalhornofthespinalcord,causingexcitation.

3) Thesecentrallystimulatednociceptorsanti-dromicallyrelease,vianeurogenic

inflammation,chemicalslikeSubstancePandCGRPbackintotheperipheral

tissuescausinginflammation,leadingtoTPformation.

4) Insomeinstances,peripheralnociceptorscanexciteneuronsinthespinal

intermediolateralsystemcausingSNA.Thischronicincreasedsympathetic

activitywillcreatearterialand/orvenousvasoconstrictionpotentiallyleading

toorgandamage,impairedimmuneresponses,and/orMStrophicchanges.

5) Fascialcontractilitywillbestimulatedinthelocalarealeadingtoexaggerated

nocifensiveandgammamotorneuronreflexes,regardlessoftheunderlying

tissuesource.Thepatientwillpresentwithpain,limitedmobility,tissue

texturechanges,andimpairedfunction.

Page 20: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

6) Thepatientwillsubsequentlyexperienceincreasednociceptiveinputasthey

mustfunctioninthepresenceofexaggeratednocifensivereflexesand

peripheralinflammation.

7) Secondorderspinalneuronswillberepeatedlystimulatedcarrying

nociceptiveimpulsestothebrainstem,limbicsystem,andthalamus.Thiscan

leadtoanexaggerationofnormalpainperceptionintheCNS,whichaddstothe

existinghyperalgesiaandperipheralnociceptiveinput.

8) PlasticityormaladaptivechangescanoccurintheCNSleadingtoallodynia,

furtherimpairingfunction.

9) Achronicstateofhyperalgesiaiscreated,withorwithoutsympatheticeffects,

inwhichallmovementthatgoesagainsttheestablishednocifensivereflexesis

limitedandpainful.IfSNAexists,arterial,venous,and/orlymphatic

vasoconstrictionwilloccur,limitingtheabilityofthesesystemstoremove

inflammatorymediatorsfromtheperipheryand/orleadingtotrophicchanges.

Thisaccountsforalargenumberofclinicalconditionsandsyndromeswhere

patientspresentwithMS,neural,visceral,and/orvascularsymptoms.

Thismulti-systemfascialmodelwouldprovideMSprotectionvianocifensive

reflexestoalltissues,notjustMStissues.Itseemsimprobablethatthebodywould

exclusivelyprotecttheMSsystem(viathegammamotorsystem)andnotcreatea

protectivemechanism,suchastheonedescribed,toprotectthemorevitalvisceral,

neuralandvascularstructures.

FASCIALCOUNTERSTRAINCASESTUDY

Page 21: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

History:Alisha,a37-year-oldwhitefemale,presentedforanorthopedicconsultation

duetoasix-yearhistoryofleftshoulderpainanddisability.Thepainwasdescribed

asamaximumof10/10withactivitiesofdailylivingandreportedlydidnotrespond

tocortisoneinjection.

Diagnostictesting:TheoriginalMRI,performedthreemonthspriortothisvisit,

demonstratedalargecalcificnoduleintheSupraspinatustendonaswellasa

‘possible’SLAP(superiorlabraltear)lesion.Thecalcificnodulewasmeasuredat1to

1.5cmlong.AsubsequentMRIandX-rayperformedfollowingtheorthopedic

consultationverifiedtheexistenceofalargecalcificnodulewhichmadeup‘afairly

largepartoftheSupraspinatusattachment,especiallyanteriorly,’accordingtothe

attendingorthopedist.

Orthopedictreatment:Afterreviewingthepatient’sdiagnosticsandhistory,the

orthopedistrecommendedsub-acromialdecompressionwithdebridementofany

non-encapsulatedcalciumdeposits.

Surgicalintervention:Threeweekslater,asub-acromialdecompressionwith‘limited

calcificdebridement’wasperformed.Thecalcificnodulewasvisualizedduring

surgeryandwasnotremovedasitwas‘quitelarge’andexcisionwouldhaverequired

acompleterotatorcuffrepair.Followingshoulderdecompression,thepatientwas

referredforstandardpost-operativephysicaltherapyconsistingofmodalities,passive

stretching,andaprogramofstrengtheningexercises.

Resultsofdecompressionandstandardrehabilitation:Fivemonthsafterinitial

consultationandfourandahalfmonthsfollowingsub-acromialdecompressionand

Page 22: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

standardrehabilitation,thepatientreturnedtotheorthopedistwithcontinued

complaintsofshoulderpainandfunctionalloss.Shehadbeendischargedfrom

physicaltherapyafterapproximately12visitshavingreachedmaximumbenefit.X-

raysperformedatthisvisitdemonstratednochangeinthecalcificnodulethathad

nowbeenpresentforatleasteightmonths(seeFigure2).

Three-monthsurgeryandrehabilitationfollow-up:Eightmonthsaftertheinitial

consultation,theorthopedistinformedthepatientthatshewouldrequireasecond,

moreinvasivesurgerytoexcisethecalcificnodule.Thissecondprocedure,duetothe

amountoftissuethatwouldneedtoberemovedduringtheexcision,wouldrequirea

completerepairoftherotatorcuff.

Atthattime,thepatientrequestedtobereferredtoBTforCStreatment,inan

attempttoavoidasecondsurgicalprocedure.

Figure2

Page 23: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Initialevaluation:Onemonthlater,theinitialphysicaltherapyevaluationandCS

treatmentwasperformed.DASH(disabilitiesofthearm,shoulder,andhand)index

demonstrateda56%disabilityscore.Thepainwasdescribedasincreasing,rateda

constant5/10intheshoulderandcervicothoracicspine.Thepatientreporteda

progressivedeteriorationinfunctionandwasunabletoreachoverheadorsleep

throughthenight.Shoulderflexionwaspainlimitedat140/180degreesand

abductionat100/180degrees.CSevaluationproceduresidentifiedmultiplesevere

vascular,neural,andMSTPsintheleft(involved)shoulderwhileonlyalimited

numberofmildTPswereidentifiedintheuninvolved(right)shoulder.Although

severalsystemsoffascialTPswereidentified,theTPsrelatedtothesympathetic

nervoussystemandSuprascapulararterywerefoundtobethemostsensitiveand

thereforediagnostic.IntheCSmodel,thisindicatedimpairmentofarterialperfusion

intheregionoftheleftshoulderandrotatorcuff(particularlytheSupraspinatus.)

CStreatment:InitialtreatmentconsistedofCStothepost-ganglionicsympathetics

fromC5toT3andtheSuprascapularartery(seeFigure3).Thesecondtreatment

(alsoexclusivelyCS)wastargetedprimarilytoaxillaryfasciaandneurovascular

bundletoimproveshouldermobilityandupperextremitybloodflow.Oversix

months,atotalof18sessionsofCSwereperformedtotheshoulder,TMJ,cervical

spine,andthoracicspineinordertoalleviatepainandrestorefunctionalrangeof

motionallinvolvedregions.

Page 24: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

(a)

(b)

Page 25: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Figure3

CStreatmentresults:Afterthefirsttreatmentvisit,thepatientreportedthatshewas

abletosleepthroughthenightforthe‘firsttimesincethepainstarted,’sixyears

earlier.Bythe11thvisitshereporteda75%improvementinpainandwasableto

driveandreachoverheadwithoutpain.Hershoulderwasnolongersymptomatic,

andtreatmentfocusshiftedtoherTMJ,cervicalspine,andthoracolumbarspine(per

patientrequest).

EightmonthsafterinitiationofCStreatment,thepatienthadreturnedtofull

ADLsandwasnolongerbeingtreatedforhershouldercondition.Duringaroutine

follow-upvisitwithherorthopedist,shewasfoundtohavenormalstrength,normal

rangeofmotion,anegativeimpingementtest,andnear100%subjectivepain

(c)

Page 26: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

reduction.X-raystakenthatdaydemonstratedfullandcompleteresolutionofthe

calcificnodule(seeFigures4and5).

Figure4

Page 27: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Figure5

CASESTUDYDISCUSSION

PriortoCStreatment,thispatienthadmorethansixyearsofshoulderpainand

functionaldisability.Hertreatmenthistoryincludedfourorthopedicconsultations,a

cortisoneinjection,asub-acromialdecompression,andsixweeksofstandardpost-

operativephysicaltherapywithoutresolutionofhercondition.Atthetimeofreferral,

thecalcificationwasclearlyvisibleonX-rayandwouldlikelyhavebeengradedinthe

moderatetosevererange(typeIorII)accordingtoGärtnerandHeyerduetothe

calcification’ssizeandwelldefinedborders(Gärtner&Heyer1995).

Theetiologyofcalcifictendonitisiscurrentlyunknown(Uhthoffetal.1976).

Researchhasdemonstratedthatcalcifictendonitis,whichoccurscommonlyin

youngerindividuals,isoftenaself-limitingcondition.Bosworthfoundtheaverage

rateofradiographicspontaneousresolutionofcalcificdepositstobe6.4%peryearor

Page 28: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

15yearsforfullreabsorption(Bosworth1941).Thecalcificreabsorptionratecanbe

acceleratedwiththeadditionofnon-operativetreatmentaccordingtoWolkand

Wittenberg(Wolk&Wittenberg1997).Theyreportedasonographicresolutionrate

of82%within8.6yearswithconservativetreatment.Withregardstopain,research

demonstratesthatcalcifictendonitissymptoms(notcalcificationreabsorption)

requiresonaverage4.4yearstoresolvewithtreatment;however,itcantakeupto

13.5yearsinsomecases(Ogonetal.2009).

Inthiscasestudy,thepatienthadsignificantsymptomreduction(abletosleep

throughthenightforthefirsttimeinsixyears)afteronetreatmentwithCStargeted

tothesympatheticnervoussystemandvascularfascia.Fullresolutionofsymptoms

andcompleteradiographiccalcificreabsorptionwasachievedwithineightmonthsof

theonsetoftreatment,verifiedbyindependentorthopedicconsultationand

diagnostics(Figures4and5).Thisisasignificantlyshorterperiodoftimethanis

typicallyassociatedwithstandard,conservativetreatment(4.4yearsforsymptom

reliefand8.6yearsforcalcificreabsorption).Reabsorption,inthiscase,occurred

92%fasterthanaverage,possiblyduetothecontributionofCStreatment.Becauseno

radiographsweretakenbeforeeightmonthsafterinitiationoftreatment,itispossible

thatcalcificreabsorptionbeganevenearlier.Additionalresearchisneededto

determinetreatmentoutcomes,buttheresultsfromthiscasestudyarepromising.

WehypothesizethatthesecasestudyresultswereduetoareductioninSNA

followingtheapplicationofCStechnique.SuccessfulreleaseofmultiplefascialTPs

reducesnociceptiveinputtothespinalcord,leadingtoanormalizationofsympathetic

Page 29: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

firingandreductionofcentralsensitization.Thisalleviatesvasoconstrictionand

improvesvascularperfusiontotherotatorcuff,thusrapidlyacceleratingthenatural

reabsorptionprocess.

CONCLUSION

FascialCounterstrainisanewlydevelopedclinicaltooldesignedtoreduce

nociceptiveinputfromallfascialsystemswiththeultimategoalofnormalizing

nocifensivereflexesandeliminatingcentralsensitization.Theproposedphysiological

rationalecanexplaintheexistenceoffascialtenderpointsandhowtheyrelateto

otherbodysystemsbyutilizingthemodernconceptsofcentralprocessingandthe

emergingscienceoffasciaasacontractilesensoryorgan.Wesuggestthatthebody

protectsalltissues,notjustmusculoskeletalstructures,vianocifensivereflexes

orchestratedbythefascialsystem.Whilefurtherresearchisneededtofullyvalidate

thetreatmentstrategydescribed,therationaleandcasestudypresentedsupportthe

useofFascialCounterstrainincasesofmusculoskeletalpainrelatedtosympathetic

nervoussystemactivation.Counterstrainhasthepotentialtoofferanewprimary

treatmentmethodfornumerousidiopathicmedicalconditionsthatareknowntoexist

invirtuallyeveryfieldofmedicine.

Page 30: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Acknowledgements

TheauthorBTisheartilythankfultohismentorsLawrenceJonesD.O.and

RandyKusunosePTwhofreelygavetheirtimeandknowledgesothathewasableto

gainexpertiseinStrainandCounterstrain.HewouldliketothanktheJonesInstitute

forprovidingaplatformandthelogisticalsupportnecessarytoreachaninternational

audiencewithFascialCounterstrain.Inaddition,BTwouldliketothankWilliamHall

Phdforhisresearchassistance,adviceandencouragementregardingpublicationof

thisarticle.Lastly,aspecialthankstoTimHodgesLMTforhissupport,friendshipand

relentlessdedicationtotheteachinganddevelopmentofFascialCounterstrain.

Page 31: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

Citations

AbAzizCB,AhmadAH2006TheRoleoftheThalamusinModulatingPain.The

MalaysianJournalofMedicalSciences:MJMS13,11-18.

BenarrochEE2006Pain-autonomicinteractions.NeurologicalSciences27,s130-s133.

BosworthBM1941Calciumdepositsintheshoulderandsubacromialbursitis:a

surveyof12,122shoulders.JournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation116,2477-

2482.

CameronDM,BrennanTJ,GebhartGF2008Hindpawincisionintheratproduces

long-lastingcolonhypersensitivity.Thejournalofpain:officialjournalofthe

AmericanPainSociety9,246-253.

ChaitowL2007Positionalreleasetechniques.ChurchillLivingstone/Elsevier,

Edinburgh.

CohenML,ArroyoJF,ChampionGD,BrowneCD1992InSearchofthePathogenesisof

RefractoryCervicobrachialPainSyndrome.ADeconstructionoftheRSIPhenomenon.

MedicalJournalofAustralia156,432-436.

CortelliP,PierangeliG2003Chronicpain-autonomicinteractions.Neurological

Sciences:OfficialJournaloftheItalianNeurologicalSocietyandoftheItalianSocietyof

ClinicalNeurophysiology24Suppl2,S68-70.

D'AmbrogioKJ,RothGB1997Positionalreleasetherapy:assessment&treatmentof

musculoskeletaldysfunction.Mosby,St.Louis.

FeindelWH,WeddellG,SinclairDC1948Painsensibilityindeepsomaticstructures.

JournalofNeurology,Neurosurgery,&Psychiatry11,113-117.

Page 32: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

ForemanRD,BlairRW,NealWeberR1984ViscerosomaticconvergenceontoT2–T4

spinoreticular,spinoreticular-spinothalamic,andspinothalamictractneuronsinthe

cat.ExperimentalNeurology85,597-619.

FryerG2016Somaticdysfunction:Anosteopathicconundrum.InternationalJournal

ofOsteopathicMedicine22,52-63.

GarfinSR,TiptonCM,MubarakSJ,WooSL,HargensAR,AkesonWH1981Roleof

fasciainmaintenanceofmuscletensionandpressure.JournalofAppliedPhysiology:

Respiratory,EnvironmentalandExercisePhysiology51,317-320.

GärtnerJ,HeyerA1995Calcifictendinitisoftheshoulder.DerOrthopade24,284-302.

GeldardFA1974TheHumanSenses,2ed.JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,NewYork.

GracelyRH,LynchSA,BennettGJ1992Painfulneuropathy:alteredcentralprocessing

maintaineddynamicallybyperipheralinput.Pain51,175-194.

HijmeringML,StroesESG,OlijhoekJ,HuttenBA,BlankestijnPJ,RabelinkTJ2002

Sympatheticactivationmarkedlyreducesendothelium-dependent,flow-mediated

vasodilation.JournaloftheAmericanCollegeofCardiology39,683-688.

HowellJN,WillardF2005Nociception:NewUnderstandingsandTheirPossible

RelationtoSomaticDysfunctionandItsTreatment.OhioResearchandClinicalReview

15,1-4.

IrvinMK,KeithAB,ElliotLeeH,GeorgeWN1970Thepotentialdisruptiveinfluenceof

somaticinput,in:KugelmassIN(Ed.),ThePhysiologicalBasisofOsteopathicMedicine.

PostgraduateInstituteofOstopathicMedicineandSurgery,NewYork,pp.39-51,54.

Page 33: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

JanigW,HablerHJ1995Visceral-autonomicintegration,in:GebbartGF(Ed.),Visceral

Pain:ProgressinPainResearchandManagement.IASPPress,Seattle.

JohanssonB1962Circulatoryresponsetostimulationofsomaticafferents.Acta

PhysiologicaScandanavia57,5-91.

JohnsonSM,KurtzME2003Osteopathicmanipulativetreatmenttechniquespreferred

bycontemporaryosteopathicphysicians.TheJournaloftheAmericanOsteopathic

Association103,219-224.

JonesLH1995Strain-Counterstrain.JonesStrain-CounterStrain,Boise.

KorrIM1975Proprioceptorsandsomaticdysfunction.TheJournaloftheAmerican

OsteopathicAssociation74,638-650.

LandauW,BishopGH1953PainfromDermal,Periosteal,andFascialEndingsand

fromInflamation:ElectrophysiologicalStudyEmployingDifferentialNerveBlocks.

A.M.A.ArchivesofNeurology&Psychiatry69,490-504.

MalpasSC2010Sympatheticnervoussystemoveractivityanditsroleinthe

developmentofcardiovasculardisease.PhysiologicalReviews90,513-557.

MegirianD1962BilateralFacilitatoryandInhibitorySkinAreasofSpinal

MotoneuronesofCat.JournalofNeurophysiology25,127-137.

MeyerRA,RingkampM,CampbellJN,RajaSN2005Neuralmechanismsof

hyperalgesiaaftertissueinjury.JohnsHopkinsAPLTechnicalDigest(AppliedPhysics

Laboratory)26,56-66.

Page 34: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

MitchellJH,SchmidtRF2011CardiovascularReflexControlbyAfferentFibersfrom

SkeletalMuscleReceptors,in:TerjungR(Ed.),ComprehensivePhysiology.JohnWiley

&Sons,Inc.,Hoboken,NJ,USA.

MountcastleVB1980Medicalphysiology,14ed.C.V.MosbyCo,St.Louis.

NiddamDM,ChanR-C,LeeS-H,YehT-C,HsiehJ-C2007Centralmodulationofpain

evokedfrommyofascialtriggerpoint.TheClinicalJournalofPain23,440-448.

OgonP,SuedkampNP,JaegerM,IzadpanahK,KoestlerW,MaierD2009Prognostic

factorsinnonoperativetherapyforchronicsymptomaticcalcifictendinitisofthe

shoulder.Arthritis&Rheumatism60,2978-2984.

PurslowPP2010Musclefasciaandforcetransmission.JBodywMovTher14,411-

417.

RuchTC1979PathophysicologyofPain,Physiologyandbiophysics.Saunders,

Philadelphia,pp.272-324.

SaphyP,ÉtinneM,ThierryG,WosinskiJ,BellonL2016"StrainCounterstrain"du

nouveaudansl'approachduDr.LawrenceHJones.ProfessionKiné50,33-36.

SatoA,SatoY,SchmidtRF1979Theeffectsofsomaticafferentactivityontheheart

rate,in:BrooksCM,KoizumiK,SatoA(Eds.),IntegrativeFunctionsoftheAutonomic

NervousSystem.UniversityofTokyoPress/Elsevier.

SchleipR2003Fascialplasticity–anewneurobiologicalexplanation:Part1.JBodyw

MovTher7,11-19.

Page 35: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

SchneiderMJ1995Tenderpoints/fibromyalgiavs.triggerpoints/myofascialpain

syndrome:aneedforclarityinterminologyanddifferentialdiagnosis.Journalof

ManipulativeandPhysiologicalTherapeutics18,398-406.

SeffingerMA,NajmWI,MishraSI,AdamsA,DickersonVM,MurphyLS,ReinschS2004

Reliabilityofspinalpalpationfordiagnosisofbackandneckpain:asystematicreview

oftheliterature.Spine29,E413-425.

ShahJP,GilliamsEA2008Uncoveringthebiochemicalmilieuofmyofascialtrigger

pointsusinginvivomicrodialysis:anapplicationofmusclepainconceptsto

myofascialpainsyndrome.JBodywMovTher12,371-384.

StaceyMJ1969Freenerveendingsinskeletalmuscleofthecat.JournalofAnatomy

105,231-254.

StilwellDL1957aTheinnervationoftendonsandaponeuroses.AmericanJournalof

Anatomy100,289-317.

StilwellDL1957bRegionalvariationsintheinnervationofdeepfasciaeand

aponeuroses.TheAnatomicalRecord127,635-653.

TuckeyB2008FascialCounterstrainfortheViscera.

TuckeyB2011FascialCounterstrainfortheLymphaticSystem.

TuckeyB2013FascialCounterstrainfortheArterialSystem.

TuckeyB2014JonesInstituteOriginatorsoftheStrainCounterstrainTechnique,

CounterstrainfortheNervousSystem:UpperBodyandCranium.

TuckeyB2015aFascialCounterstrainfortheMusculoskeletalSystemandBrain.

TuckeyB2015bFascialCounterstrainforthenervousSystemLowerQuadrant.

Page 36: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

TuckeyB2015cIntroductiontoFascialCounterstrain.

UhthoffHK,SarkarK,MaynardJA1976Calcifyingtendinitis:anewconceptofits

pathogenesis.ClinicalOrthopaedicsandRelatedResearch,164-168.

VanBuskirkRL1990Nociceptivereflexesandthesomaticdysfunction:amodel.The

JournaloftheAmericanOsteopathicAssociation90,792-794,797-809.

WillisWD,SlukaKA,ReesH,WestlundKN1998Acontributionofdorsalrootreflexes

toperipheralinflammation,in:RudominP,RomoR,MendellLM(Eds.),Presynaptic

inhibitionandneuralcontrol.OxfordUniversityPress,NewYork,pp.407-423.

WolkT,WittenbergRH1997Calcifyingsubacromialsyndrome-clinicaland

ultrasoundoutcomeofnon-surgicaltherapy.ZOrthopIhreGrenzgeb135,451-457.

WongCK2012Straincounterstrain:currentconceptsandclinicalevidence.ManTher

17,2-8.

WoolfCJ2011Centralsensitization:implicationsforthediagnosisandtreatmentof

pain.Pain152,S2-15.

WoolfCJ,SalterMW2000Neuronalplasticity:increasingthegaininpain.Science

(NewYork,N.Y.)288,1765-1769.

Page 37: A New Rationale and Treatment Model for …...A physiological rationale for the CS treatment model is presented that incorporates concepts of central processing and the science of

FigureCaptions

Figure1.CSreleaseforIleum,visceraldysfunction(Tuckey2008).TPislocatedover

thereflectedheadoftheRectusFemorismuscle,justbelowtheupperrimofthe

acetabulum(superior,medial,anddeeptothegreatertrochanter)(a).Treatmentis

performedwiththepatientsupine,andfascialglideisappliedtotheileum,beneath

theumbilicus,inaposterior,lateral,andslightlyinferiordirectiontowardthe

acetabulum(b).

Figure2.Three-monthfollow-upX-raytakenaftersurgeryandstandard

rehabilitation.

Figure3.CSreleaseforC4-T5postganglionicsympatheticnerves(Tuckey2014,

2015c).TPsarelocatedovertheanterioraspectofthecervicaltransverseprocesses

fromC4-C6(a)andovertheinferioraspectoftheribtubercles2-5(b)(Notethatthe

TPsarenon-muscular).TopalpateTPlocationsapproachanteriortoposteriorforthe

C4-C5locationsandinferiortosuperiorfortheT2-T5locations.Treatmentis

performedwithpatientsupinepositioningtheshoulderintoflexionandadduction

withtheadditionofmildarmtractionasneededtoresolvetheTP(c).

Figure4.PostCStreatmentX-ray.

Figure5.PostCStreatment,physicianfollow-upnotes.