A new milestone event for reducing disasters The World Conference on Disaster Reduction Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2005 African Regional Consultation on Disaster Reduction Johannesburg, 2/3 June 2004 United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) www.unisdr.org
28
Embed
A new milestone event for reducing disasters The World Conference on Disaster Reduction Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2005 African Regional Consultation.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A new milestone event for reducing disasters
The World Conference onDisaster Reduction
Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2005
African Regional Consultation on Disaster Reduction
Johannesburg, 2/3 June 2004
A new milestone event for reducing disasters
The World Conference onDisaster Reduction
Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2005
African Regional Consultation on Disaster Reduction
Johannesburg, 2/3 June 2004
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) www.unisdr.org
Overview
I The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
II World Conference on Disaster Reduction, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004
III Priority areas for action - Means to reduce disaster risk
IV Way forward
The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
Can sustainable development be achieved without taking into account the risk to natural hazards? Short answer: NO!
Identification of hazards & vulnerability and management of risk are integral to sustainable development.
• Risks will always remain
• Address root-causes to vulnerability: social, economic, environmental, technical-physical factors
I
The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
I
Disaster losses, total and as share of GDP, 1985-1999
Note: “Richest countries” are defined as having a per capita annual gross domestic product greater than USD 9’361, while “poorest” are defined as those with less than USD 760.
Source: Munich Re and J. Abramovitz, 2001
The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
I
• Reducing risk is everyone’s business!
• All sectors have a responsibility- can increase or reduce risk depending on decisions or actions
• Disaster risk reduction is a “cross-cutting” & holistic issue
• Needs sustained commitments and institutionalization to developing capabilities – political, professional, and among individual people
Governments – central, provincial, local Organized community and civil society groups, research and scientific community, individuals
International and regional organizations
The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
I
International Strategy for Disaster ReductionUN is seeking to increase its coordination & commitment to support national and local efforts through policy advocacy, public awareness, information sharing, building partnerships:
The ISDR aims at building disaster resilient communities by promoting increased awareness of the importance of disaster reduction as an integral component of sustainable development, with the goal of reducing human, social, economic and environmental losses due to natural hazards and related technological and environmental disasters.
The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
I
The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
I
The six principles of sustainability
Overview
I The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
II World Conference on Disaster Reduction, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004
III Priority areas for action - Means to reduce disaster risk
IV Way forward
• Conclude the review of the implementation of the Yokohama Strategy, updating the guiding framework on disaster reduction
• From commitment to implementation! To identify specific activities aimed at ensuring the implementation WSSD
• Increase awareness of importance of disaster reduction policies
• Share information including on good practices and identify gaps
Objectives of the World Conference
World Conference on Disaster Reduction Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004 IV
1. Intergovernmental process
To ensure the adoption of outcomes. • Preparatory meetings and a Bureau in Geneva
2. Knowledge exchange
Thematic policy discussions focusing on implementation, good practices & partnerships
• Organized by interested organizations
3. Public forum
To raise awareness to a wider public• Exhibits, NGO forum, culture activities
World Conference on Disaster Reduction Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004 IV
Preparatory process
Living With Risk and other relevant reports
Regional and thematic consultations
Compilation of national findings
Open endedintergovernmental process
Conference Outcomes
Programme for 2005-2015 including objectives and priority areas for action. Implementation mechanism
List of partnerships to support implementation
Strategy Documents
Yokohama Review
World Conference on Disaster Reduction Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004 IV
Expected Impact of the World Conference
• Increased political commitment at national and international scale
• Clearer directions and priorities for action• Benchmarks, targets, indicators, and framework for
guiding disaster risk reduction• Launching of specific initiatives and partnerships for
implementation
World Conference on Disaster Reduction Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004 IV
• Wider infrastructure protection – as techniques are known, and professional resources already available. This is as much a governance issue as it is a technical one.
• Applying existing advanced technologies, can focus on local scales, too. (e.g. GIS applications, localized telecommunications systems, remote sensing)
Priority areas for action - Means to reduce disaster risk III
• Relate risk awareness and monitoring responsibilities into existing disaster management and contingency planning.
• Benefit of more balanced resource allocations between prior prevention/preparedness vs. emergency assistance and recovery only after the assets are lost or damaged.
• Expanding contingency outlooks to slower onset conditions, such as environmental hazards, climate change implications, rapid urban growth and risks. Also good opportunity for wider approach to public awareness and policy advocacy of complementary functions of “Relief and Development”.
Priority areas for action - Means to reduce disaster risk III
Strengthening Disaster Preparedness and Contingency Planning
• Crucial information sharing, clearing-house functions
• Time bound objectives & priorities, baseline for measurement of accomplishment – or modification, based on experience.
Priority areas for action - Means to reduce disaster risk III
Guiding and reporting on accomplishments in disaster risk reduction
Overview
I The vision of disaster risk reduction: Building resilient communities towards sustainable development
II World Conference on Disaster Reduction, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18-22 January 2004
III Priority areas for action - Means to reduce disaster risk
IV Way forward
Way forward V
• National information and promote national committees or platforms (where not existing) for WCDR reporting with designated point of contact
• Within individual countries encourage inclusion of environmental, climate and public health, urbanization as “emerging risks”.
• Identify gaps in implementation and making risk reduction
part of development initiatives- related to resourcing • What is your governments expectations on the WCDR?
" More effective prevention strategies would save not only tens of billions of dollars, but save tens of thousands of lives. Funds currently spent on intervention and relief could be devoted to enhancing equitable and sustainable development instead, which would further reduce the risk for war and disaster. Building a culture of prevention is not easy. While the costs of prevention have to be paid in the present, its benefits lie in a distant future. Moreover, the benefits are not tangible; they are the disasters that did NOT happen. "
Kofi Annan, “Facing the Humanitarian Challenge: Towards a Culture of Prevention”, UNGA, A/54/1