A New Approach to E- reserves The Seneca Libraries Experience End User – April 28, 2007 Presented by: Jane Foo, Manager of Digital Library Services & Information Systems Jennifer Peters-Lise, Metadata & Digital Services Librarian Sharon Tait, Digital Library Systems
59
Embed
A New Approach to E-reserves The Seneca Libraries Experience End User – April 28, 2007 Presented by: Jane Foo, Manager of Digital Library Services & Information.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A New Approach to E-reserves The Seneca Libraries Experience
End User – April 28, 2007
Presented by:
Jane Foo, Manager of Digital Library Services & Information Systems
Jennifer Peters-Lise, Metadata & Digital Services Librarian
Sharon Tait, Digital Library Systems
Today’s talk
• Background on e-reserves project– Goals for e-reserves– Research committee– Prototypes
• Encompass for Digital Collections– Set-up & customizations– Metadata– Policies & procedures
• The future…
Seneca College
• Toronto, Ontario• 18,000 FTE; 90,000 PT• 678 FT faculty• 4 campus libraries• 12 FT librarians ; about 30 FT technicians• Over 100,000 books
Goals for E-reserves
• Collocate all course materials into one list
• Access as much as possible online
• Not online? Tell them where to find it!
• User friendly and inexpensive system
Course materials
• Print Reserves
• E-reserves– Traditional reserve-type material available online
• Research by course pages
Research by Course pages
Seneca’s current reserves• Mixture of formats
• Paper copies damaged; pages lost
• Complaints about loan periods
• Line-ups everywhere!
• Major disconnection between materials– Research by course pages on our website– Reserves in the OPAC– Textbooks on OPAC but separate from reserves
E-reserves Research Committee
• Oct 2005 - Dec 2006
• Examined: – Seneca’s current reserves– Canadian E-reserves Scan
• 17 existing e-reserves projects across Canada
– Available systems for e-reserves
See final committee report for more information…
Systems tested for e-reserves
Commercial system: DocutekSeneca owned systems: Blackboard, Voyager, EDC
Docutek
Course dashboard
Docutek’s ERes
• What we liked– User friendly– Self-maintenance available– Administrative control
• What we didn’t like– Duplicate data entry – Cost– Stand-alone system
Voyager
Embedding the link in Blackboard
Embedding the link in Blackboard
Voyager
• What we liked:– Cataloguing– Integration of print and electronic materials– Maintenance
• What we didn’t like– Results/browsing interface
Blackboard’s Content System
Blackboard• What we liked:
– Familiarity with system– Access for students– Logical hierarchy of readings
• What we did not like:– No cataloguing – only filename– Limited searching capabilities– No reports and limited statistics – No administrative control over our content within Blackboard
Encompass for Digital Collections
Main page
Browsing by course code
Organizing readings by week
Alternate organization of readings
Search for course code
Results display
Encompass and BlackBoard
• Embedded
• Link directly to browsing list from a course page in Blackboard
EDC – what we liked• Cataloguing workflow
– Quick templates = no duplicate data entry– Immediate error correction– Top-down collection view– Maintain database integrity by limiting access to cataloguing
• Import MARC records
• Similarity to ILS system
• Combines logical browsing of Blackboard with the cataloguing and data control of Voyager
Setting Up EDC• Base and Repository DMD
– Collection DMD – Qualified DC (encdc.dtd)
– Repo DMD – customized two dtds
• Complete Repo DMD Mapping to Collection DMD based on Crosswalk developed by Jenn
list, object record and view relationship pages• display order • custom metadata xsl files for field display• custom search indices (course code, instructor,
date added)
Custom field displays
Linking directly from browse and search
2 types of links:• link(url tag)• digital object(objResURL tag)
Live linking to Voyager
automatically constructed live link to Voyager recordusing importedBib ID(aka unique-identifier tag)
Re-purposing “View Relationships”
This is just the beginning …
• 2 iterations so far• Faculty involvement from project onset• Staff town hall and training sessions
distinction between electronic vs. print
• User-centered testing / feedback – Summer 2007• Explore and create more opportunities for embedding /
integration
Policies and Procedures – content & staffing
• Merge Research by Course pages into the system
• Both reference and borrower services staff will catalogue materials for the system
Policies and procedures - copyright
• “Fair dealing" does not apply to teaching materials in Canada.
• Access Copyright license does not apply to digitization of print materials
• We must contact copyright holders for licensing
Policies and procedures - digitization
• Digitize faculty created items with permission
• Seek copyright permission and scan as many print reserves as possible
Pilot project -- Jan-Dec 2007
• Staff training for scanning, e-reserves system and copyright (Mar)
• Retroactive cataloguing (Apr-May)
• User testing and follow-up (Summer)
• Marketing sub-committee and plan (Summer)
• Larger pilot and evaluation (Sept-Dec)
Digitool Plans
• Current status• Migration Path• Can we make it work?
• Administration
• Web forms
• Customization
• Metadata
• Exporting existing metadata
• Other digital repository projects• A first look (demo) and initial ideas