Chapter One Introduction 1.1 Introduction From the very beginning negotiation is a part of business. The businessman bargain and negotiate over their products on various aspects. Different factors affect the negotiation process. Culture is one of them. Culture is the unique character of a social group. It encompasses the values and norms shared by members of that group. It is the economic, social, political, and religious institutions that direct and control current group members and socialize new members (Lytle, Brett, Barsness, Tinsley, & Janssens, 1995). All of these elements of culture can affect negotiations. A negotiation can’t be successful if the parties are not familiar with each other’s culture. Negotiation is a form of social interaction. It is the process by which 2 or more parties try to resolve perceived incompatible goals. (Carnevale & Pruitt, 1992). Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties intended to reach an understanding, resolve points of difference, to gain advantage for an individual or collective, or to craft outcomes to satisfy various interests. Negotiation is the process where interested parties resolve disputes, 1 | Page
28
Embed
A negotiation between Beximco Textiles Limited & Square Textiles Limited & its Outcome
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Chapter One
Introduction
1.1 Introduction
From the very beginning negotiation is a part of business. The
businessman bargain and negotiate over their products on
various aspects. Different factors affect the negotiation
process. Culture is one of them. Culture is the unique
character of a social group. It encompasses the values and
norms shared by members of that group. It is the economic,
social, political, and religious institutions that direct and
control current group members and socialize new members
(Lytle, Brett, Barsness, Tinsley, & Janssens, 1995). All of
these elements of culture can affect negotiations. A
negotiation can’t be successful if the parties are not
familiar with each other’s culture.
Negotiation is a form of social interaction. It is the process
by which 2 or more parties try to resolve perceived
incompatible goals. (Carnevale & Pruitt, 1992). Negotiation is
a dialogue between two or more people or parties intended to
reach an understanding, resolve points of difference, to gain
advantage for an individual or collective, or to craft
outcomes to satisfy various interests.
Negotiation is the process where interested parties
specialized finishes of denim cloth for export in finished as
well as cloth only form.
2.2 History of Square Textiles Limited
In 1997, entered the textile sector with its
manufacturing facilities of cotton yarn. Combining modern
technology with skilled manpower under 's unique
inspiring, atmosphere, this new venture soon rose to the
top of the local textile industry. Today it has one of the
most sophisticated vertically integrated set-ups.
2.2 Square in Textile Business
SQUARE has over 12 years of experience in yarn spinning. The
industry is one of the largest producer of knitting & weaving
yarns in Bangladesh. Today it has one of the most
sophisticated vertically integrated set-ups by which we are
producing 90,000 kg of yarns every day. We are recognized by
our valued customers through qualigy products with committed
services.
8 | P a g e
Mission
Our mission is the pole star of our vision for maximization of
production of quality life saving products and services
strictly on ethical and moral standards at minimum costs to
the society ensuring optimum benefits to the consumers, the
shareholders and other stakeholders.
Vision
Our conception of business germinated from our vision which
sees it as a means to the well being of the investors,
stakeholders, employees and members of the society at large by
creating new wealth in the form of goods and services that go
to satisfy the wants of all of them without distributing or
damaging the socio-ecological balance of the mother earth and
the process of human civilization leading to peaceful Co-
existence of all the living beings.
Objective
To strive hard to optimize profit through conduction of
transparent business operations within the legal & social
framework with malice to none and justice for all in
respective of gender disparity, caste, creed of religion or
region.
• To create more jobs with minimum investments
• To be competitive in the internal as well as external
markets
• To maximize export earning with minimum imported in-puts
• To reduce the income gap between top & bottom categories
categories of employees9 | P a g e
• To promote corporate social responsibilities (CSR) amongst
all
Chapter Three
Literature Review
3.1 Common procedural stages of Negotiation and Diplomacy:
Both negotiation and diplomacy have some sort of common
procedural steps. They are
10 | P a g e
Preparation stage: In this Stage both the negotiator and the
diplomat plan how to approach the actual negotiation and try
to learn as much as possible about their negotiating partners.
Both the negotiator and the diplomat need to understand their
own position And anticipate the position of the other party
through considering each party’s objectives, needs and
interests.
Relationship Building Stage: Relationship building starts when
the parties begin their discussion. The objective of the
relationship building stage is for the parties to get to know
one another. How much each party needs to know about the other
depends to a great extent on culture. Both negotiators and
diplomats try to build a good relationship before starting
negotiators.
Information Exchange: Information exchange involves each party
stating an initial position, usually in a formal presentation,
followed by questions, answers, and discussion. The meaning of
this stage varies depending on the negotiator’s and diplomat’s
cultural background.
Persuasion: Both Negotiators and Diplomats try to convince
their counterparts to accept their proposals. This might
involve the parties consciously trying to work toward a
mutually acceptable solution or one party using persuasive
arguments to influence the other.
11 | P a g e
Agreement: Agreement is where the parties come to a mutually
acceptable solution, and in the process, each may make
concessions.
3.2 Integrative Negotiation
When a negotiation is integrative, it means that negotiation
is based on interest or otherwise negotiation strategy which
lay emphasis on win-win situation. The goal of Integrative
Negotiation is to make the parties’ interest compatible, so
that both sides can win. That is, reach an agreement that
satisfies their need. The goals of the parties are
integrative. Negotiations are not mutually exclusive. If one
party achieves its goals, the other is not precluded from
achieving its goals as well. The fundamental structure of
integrative negotiation situation is such that, it allows both
sides to achieve their objective.
While Integrative Negotiation Strategies are preferable, they
are not always possible. Sometimes parties’ interests really
are opposed as when both sides want a larger share of fixed
resources.
12 | P a g e
3.3 Characteristic Of Integrative Negotiation
Ø It focus on commonalties rather than differences
Ø It attempt to address needs and interests, not positions
Ø It commit to meeting the needs of all involved parties
Ø Exchange information and ideas
Ø Invent options for mutual gain
Ø Use objective criteria for standard of performance.
Past experience, based perceptions and truly distributive
aspects of bargaining makes it remarkable that integrative
agreements occur at all. But they do, largely because
negotiators work hard to overcome inhibiting factors and
search assertively for common ground. Those wishing to achieve
integrative results find that they must manage both the
contest and the process of negotiation in order to gain the
cooperation and commitment of all parties. Key contextual
factors include:
- Creating a free flow of information
- Attempting to understand the other negotiator’s real need
and objective
- Emphasizing the commonalties between the parties and
minimizing the differences
13 | P a g e
- Searching for solutions that meet the needs and objectives
of both sides.
3.4 Key Steps In Integrative Negotiation Processs
There are four major steps in the Integrative Negotiation
Process:
1. Identify and define the problem
2. Understand the problem and bring interests and needs to the
surface
3. Generate alternative solution to the problems
4. Evaluate those alternatives and select among them.
3.4 1. IDENTIFY AND DEFINE THE PROBLEM
The problem identification step is often the most difficult
one and it is even more challenging when several parties are
involved. Negotiator need to consider five aspects when
identifying and defining the problems.
§ Define the problem in a way that is mutually acceptable to
both sides.
§ State the problem with an eye toward practicality and
comprehensiveness
14 | P a g e
§ State the problem as a goal and identify the obstacles to
attaining this goal.
§ Depersonalize the problem
§ Separate the problem definition from the search for
solution.
3.4.2. UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM FULLY
Identify interest needs – Many writers have stressed that a
key step in achieving an Integrative Agreement is the ability
of the parties to understand and satisfy each others interest.
Identifying interest is a critical step in the Integrative
Negotiation Process. Interests are the underlying concerns,
need or desires that motivate a negotiator to take a
particular position. However, in as much as satisfaction may
be difficult and understanding of the underlying interest may
permit them to invent solutions that meet their interest. More
so, several types of interests may be at stake in a
negotiation and that type may be intrinsic (the parties value
it in and of itself) or instrumental (the parties value it
because it helps them derive other outcomes in the futures.
TYPES OF INTERESTS
§ Substantive Interests - related to the focal issues under
negotiation
§ Process Interests are related to the way a dispute is
settled15 | P a g e
§ Relationship Interests – indicate that one or both parties
value their relationship with each other and do not want to
take actions that will damage it.
3.4.3. GENERATING ALTRNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM AS
GIVEN:
In addition to the techniques mentioned above, there are
several other approaches to generating alternative solution.
These approaches can be used by the negotiators themselves or
by a number of other parties. Several of these approaches are
commonly used in small groups. These include: Brainstorming:
In brainstorming, small groups of people work to generate as
many possible solutions to the problem as they can. Someone
records; the solutions without comment, as they are identified
participants are urged to be spontaneous, even impractical and
not to censor anyone’s ideas. The success of brainstorming
depends on the amount of intellectual stimulation that occurs
as different ideas are generated.
3.4.4. EVALUATE AND SELECT ALTERNATIVES:
The fourth stage in the Integrated Negotiation Process is to
evaluate the alternatives generated during the previous phase
and to select the best ones to implement. When the challenge
is a reasonable, simple one, the evaluation and selection
steps may be effectively combined into a singly step. For
those uncomfortable with the Integrative Process, though we
16 | P a g e
suggest a close adherence to a series of distinct steps:
definitions and standards, alternative, evaluating and
selection. The following guidelines should be used in
evaluating options and reaching a consensus.
1. Narrow the range of solution options
2. Evaluate solution on the basic of quality, and
acceptability
3. Agree to the criteria in advance of evaluating options
4. Be willing to justify personal preferences
5. Be alert to the influence of intangibles in selecting
options
6. Use subgroups to evaluate complex options
7. Take time out to cool off
8. Explore different ways to logroll.
3.5 Factors That Facilitate Successful Integrative Negotiation
We have stressed that successful Integrative Negotiation can
occur if the parties are predisposed to finding a mutually
acceptable joint solution. Many other factors contribute to a
predisposition toward problem solving and a willingness to
work together to find the best solution. These factors are
also the preconditions necessary for more successful
integrative negotiation. These factors includes:-
17 | P a g e
- some common objective or goal
- faith in one’s problem – solving ability
- a belief in the validity of one’s own position and the
other’s perspective
- The motivation and commitment to work together.
- Trust
- Clear and accurate communication
3.6 Challenges to Using Integrative Negotiation:
Integrative negotiation can be tricky to set in motion, sincenegotiation sessions are often volatile. A considerable amountof trust must be established in order for the opposing partiesto be able to work towards satisfying each other’s interests.Also, a successful integrative process requires both sides tobuy into that approach. If one party is determined to use awin-lose “fixed pie” approach, the other side is more or lessforced to use the same method. Teamwork cannot happen ifpotential team members are competing against each other.Furthermore, short-term thinking can lead one party to makeuse of whatever force is available to it to effectivelystrong-arm the other, without considering the long-termramifications affecting their future relationship. While mostnegotiations have elements of both competition and
18 | P a g e
cooperation, the best outcomes are brought about by thinkingin terms of the health of the ongoing relationship between theparties, rather than only an individual signed contract orcompromise.
Chapter Four
Practical Negotiation Steps
In this case negotiation between Beximco textile limited and
square textiles limited, practical negotiation is done in
19 | P a g e
seven steps. These elements are explored in the following.
4.1. Identifying interests
According to Fisher and Ury, the first step in principled
negotiations is to identify the interests involved in an issue
area as opposed to dealing with positions of the negotiating
parties.
In this case Both Beximco textile limited and square textiles
limited, for both party main interest is Slub denim (20oz).
4.2. People
Another element of integrative strategies involves People. In
Getting to Yes, Fisher and Ury argue that parties in a dispute
often forget that the other side consists of people who, just
like themselves, are subject to the human frailties such as
emotions, potentials for misunderstandings and mistaken
assumptions. Another rule for the principled negotiator is
therefore to separate the people from the problem. This means
finding a way for solving a problem without getting distracted
by personal elements, and coming to an agreement in a manner
that will preserve the relationship.
In this case Both Beximco textile limited and square textiles
limited, both party negotiation team consists of marketing
people and production specialist. So there is no communication
problem arise regarding marketing or production terminology.
20 | P a g e
Also decision marking person was present in negotiation table.
So there was no change of miscommunication.
4.3. Alternatives
In order to set realistic goals, negotiators must start by
considering certain fundamental questions: where will each
side be if no agreement is reached? What alternative solutions
are available for meeting your goals if you cannot count on
the cooperation of the other side? As seen earlier, attention
to alternatives is an important feature of distributive as
well as of integrative-based approaches. However, in contrast
to the emphasis that is placed onbconcepts such as reservation
points and bottom lines in positional approaches to
bargaining, integrative approaches tend to take a slightly
more nuanced view of the role of alternatives in negotiation.
Fisher and Ury argue that it is crucial for both parties to
know their Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA)
both before and throughout all stages of a negotiation. Fisher
and Ury argue that having a resolute bottom line can come at
high costs. By its nature, a bottom line can be inflexible and
onerous. It can prevent creative thinking
and lock parties into positions that may prevent them from
coming to a favorable solution.
4.4. Identifying the options
Once parties have begun to build relationships and to exchange
information in order to gain a clearer understanding of the
interests at stake, the parties should turn to the task of
21 | P a g e
generating options. In negotiations, options are possible
solutions to a problem shared by two or more parties. In
integrative bargaining, options represent possible ways of
meeting as many of both parties’ interests as possible. As the
story of the orange reveals, when two people (or two companies
or two nations) get locked into solutions or habitual patterns
of thinking, they easily become blinded to the possibilities
that a little creative thinking might reveal. Because the
process of identifying options, or possible solutions to a
problem, promotes creative thinking and expands problem-
solving capabilities, it is as critical to the negotiation
process as identifying underlying interests. Generating
options through techniques such as brainstorming —a technique
which involves inviting all parties to list any idea that
comes to mind without criticizing or dismissing those ideas -
helps to encourage creative thinking about a problem and
increases the chances that the parties involved will formulate
a “win-win” solution.
In this case both party was not in situation to reject or
search for more party to negotiate. So there were no other
options.
4.5. Criteria/Legitimacy
When bargaining over positions, negotiators create a situation
in which one side must concede his original claim in order for
the negotiations to succeed. Positional bargaining is
bargaining in which two sides lock into incompatible
22 | P a g e
positions. According to Fisher and Ury, this can lead to a
contest of wills, bitterness, and deadlock. They maintain that
when negotiations are approached in this way, even when a deal
is made, it may come at a high cost.
In this step Beximco textile limited and square textiles
limited, both party negotiation team checked fabric quality,
fabric strength as per requirement. Production people
thoroughly checked this part. When production QC gives
assurance that fabric quality is ok than marketing people
starts negotiation about pricing.
4.6. Commitments
A negotiated settlement is only enduring if all parties honor
the commitments that they make. Of course, those that fail to
follow through on their promises stand to suffer a loss of
integrity, be subject to the resentment of the other side, and
risk that their partner in the negotiations (and possibly
others outside of the deal as well if word of their reputation
escapes) will refuse to deal with them in the future. No party
to a negotiation should intentionally create commitments that
they do not intend to honor.
In this stage, Beximco textile limited and square textiles
limited, both party negotiation team agrees to set a mutual
price. They fixed fabric delivery date, payment method,
quantity of fabric will purchase, transpiration method etc.
23 | P a g e
7. Communication
Negotiation is only possible through communication. Fisher and
Ury maintain that feeling heard is also a key interest for
both sides in a negotiation. Good communication can change
attitudes, prevent or overcome deadlock and misunderstandings
and help to improve relationships. Moreover, good
communication skills are essential to cogently relay your
message, and to thoroughly understand the message of the other
side (Wondwosen, 2006). In addition, integrative approaches
stress the importance of sharing information as a means of
uncovering interests and of helping parties to explore common
problems or threats. Still, negotiators are frequently
hampered in their roles by common communicational errors or
inefficiencies
When deal is done regular commumication happends with both
party regarding delivery issue, fabric fault, replacement of
fabric, payment etc. This regular communication helps to built
a good relationship between both party.
24 | P a g e
Chapter Five
Conclusion
In conclusion, whether a negotiation is distributive or
integrative, negotiation should focus on substance which will
produce a mutually beneficial agreement at lower cost and also
focus on relations in which the parties maintain civil
relations of mutual recognition and respect and improve their
joint problem solving ability.
25 | P a g e
In the end, negotiation is a process that can be approached in
many ways. No matter what strategy company choose, success
lies in how well you prepared. The key to negotiating a
beneficial outcome is the negotiators’ ability to consider all
the elements of the situation carefully and to identify and
think through the options. At the same time, negotiators must
be able to keep events in perspective and be as fair and
honest as circumstance allows. Because a common ground or
interest has brought the parties to the negotiating table, a
negotiator can benefit by trying to capitalize on this common
ground. By looking at the other side as a partner rather than
an opponent and by working together, negotiators have an
opportunity to craft a solution that will be beneficial to
both sides
26 | P a g e
Bibliography
Brett, J., Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals,
Resolve Disputes, and make Decisions Across Cultural
Boundaries 9 (2nd Edition) (San Francisco, USA: Jossey
Bass,2007).
Hodgetts ,Luthan, Doh- International Management (6th
edition) (The Mcgraw-Hill companies,2006).
Brett, J., Adair, W., Lempereur, A., Okumara, T.,
Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., Lytle, A., Culture and Gains
in Negotiation, 14 N. J. 1, 63 (1998).
Corne, P., The Complex Art of Negotiation Between
Different Cultures, 47 ARB. J. 4, 50 (1992).
Gelfand Michele J.,Brett Jeanne m., The handbook of