Top Banner
MEAN-VALUE METHOD OF LATERAL FORCE CALIBRATION A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman
18

A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman. We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project. We would also like to thank Professor.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

MEAN-VALUE METHOD OF LATERAL FORCE CALIBRATION

A Major Qualifying ProjectByDerek Eggiman

Page 2: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

INTRODUCTION

Page 3: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.

We would also like to thank Professor Nancy Burnham and Dr. Deli Liu.

Page 4: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE

Focused laser is reflected off cantilever.

Changes in cantilever orientation result in a change of laser position

Laser position is detected by the photo diode.

Cantilever position is interpolated from

photo diode signal.

Page 5: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

CURRENT PROBLEMS IN LFM CALIBRATION Many studies assume a functional form

for friction, f=μ(N+A). Other methods calibrate as a function

of load. Repeated scans Excess tip wear.

Other methods require special equipment or are far to complicated and time consuming.

Want quick, in-situ method.

Page 6: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

METHODOLOGY

Equilibrium equations depend on direction of motion (Vx) and angle (θ).

Taking the average value of scans in opposite directions over the same surface results in cancelations.

Flat-avg= Floadtan(θ) or Vlat-avg= αFloadtan(θ)

Page 7: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

Page 8: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

SAMPLES:TESTED

Piano wire Steel rod Solder spheres 1.588 mm diameter

Si3N4 ball bearings

http://www.satotekkou.co.jp/en/product/img/ceramic-p04.jpg

Page 9: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

SINGLE SCAN: TOPOGRAPHY & LFM

Page 10: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

SINGLE SCAN: RE-PLOT

Page 11: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

EXPERIMENTAL DIFFICULTIES

Finding a sufficiently smooth surface

Lack of lateral force sensitivity

Crosstalk of lateral and normal force signals

Page 12: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

CROSSTALK

Page 13: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

FULL SCAN MEAN-VALUE ANALYSIS

Obtained by taking a complete image of 256X256 data points in a 27 X 27 (μm) scan range.

Then taking the mean value along the y axis and using this data to perform our analysis.

Plotted the mean value of: Topography (μm) LFM Forward LFM Reverse

Page 14: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

FULL SCAN: TOPOGRAPHY

Page 15: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

FULL SCAN: LFM

Page 16: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

FULL SCAN: RE-PLOT

Page 17: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean value of 256 X 256 point scan shows high degree of linearity. R2=0.961.

Successfully derived proof of concept. Work will be continued by Saonti

Chakraborty and published in a peer reviewed journal.

Page 18: A Major Qualifying Project By Derek Eggiman.  We would like to thank Sigma-Xi for generously funding this project.  We would also like to thank Professor.

QUESTIONS?

http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=771