Top Banner
A Comparative Study of Facilitator Competencies in a Sample of U.S. and S. Korean Facilitators Judith A. Kolb, Penn State Hong Min Kim, Penn State Ji Hoon Song, Oklahoma State AHRD Conference 2/27/10 Knoxville
12

A H R D 2010 Kolb Kim Song 2

Nov 29, 2014

Download

Documents

Hong Kim

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

A Comparative Study of Facilitator Competencies in a Sample of U.S.

and S. Korean Facilitators

Judith A. Kolb, Penn StateHong Min Kim, Penn State

Ji Hoon Song, Oklahoma StateAHRD Conference 2/27/10 Knoxville

Page 2: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Rationale for Study

• Extend Kolb, Jin, & Song (2008) study of facilitator competencies to non-U.S. sample

• Address limitation and suggestion for future research from that study—”examine application of this model to other cultures” (p. 131) – Kolb, J. A., Jin, S., & Song, J. H. (2008). A model of small

group facilitator competencies. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(2), 119-133.

Page 3: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Facilitator Definition

A person who remains neutral in the actual decision (s) of the group but who assumes the responsibility for managing the group’s process while it is attempting to solve a problem or reach a decision

Page 4: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Research Question

What similarities and differences exist between scores and rankings collected from a sample of facilitators working in South Korea and scores and rankings reported by Kolb et al. (2008)?

Page 5: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Sample & Analysis

• Sample -40 U.S. Facilitators (2008) -57 Korean Facilitators (2009)

• Analysis -Comparison of competency mean scores and rankings -Interdependent t-tests -Spearman’s rank correlation

Page 6: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Results: Overview

• Comparison in mean score (t-tests) -No significant differences in 15 competencies -Significant differences in 8 competencies

• Correlation in rank (Spearman’s rho) -ρ (rho)=.61 (p<.01) -Significant correlation in rank between the two data sets

Page 7: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Results (continued)

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C232.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

USAKor

Comparison in mean score

Page 8: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Results (continued)

Comparison in rank

C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C20 C21 C22 C230

5

10

15

20

25

USAKor

Page 9: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Results (continued)

Top-ranked 3 competencies

1. Listens actively

2. Creates a climate that supports interaction and discussion

3. Encourages group involvement in, and ownership of, issues and tasks

1. Same

2. Stimulates small group insights and creativity

3. Same

U.S. Korea

Page 10: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Results (continued)

~~3

4

5

U.S.

Korea

Listens actively (1st)

Encourages

Involvement

and ownership (3rd)

Stimulates small group

insights and creativity

(KO 2nd)

Creates a climate that

supports interaction and

discussion (US 2nd)

Score comparison of top-ranked 3 competencies

Page 11: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Implications for Research

• Similar patterns could be considered as evidence of the facilitator competency model’s validity

• Kolb et al.’s (2008) belief that listening would be highly ranked in another culture was supported

• Need to analyze qualitative data from this study that will give depth to findings reported here

• Further studies needed to improve the validity of the facilitator competency model

Page 12: A H R D 2010  Kolb  Kim  Song 2

+ Q & A session