Page 1
A Genetic Analysis of the Life Cycle of Volvariella volvacea
by He Xiaoyi
Thesis submitted as partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Philosophy
February, 1996 Division of Biology
Graduate School The Chinese University ofHong Kong
RECEIVED - 5 AUG 199?
Page 2
^ M ^
(n 2 2 m 1998 j i J ^ ¾ U'IVERSiTY ~iM \>vLiBRARY SYSTEMyW X ^ ^ ^
iK^SffliMMMMBBMHHlB^BBHMMMW———M^^BM^MI^^^^^^^^^^MI^M^MIMB
Page 3
Statement
All the experimental works reported in this thesis were performed by the author unless specially stated otherwise in the text.
He Xiaoyi
Page 4
Abstract
Volvariella volvacea is the most popular fresh mushroom in Hong Kong. Li
order to find out whether genetic variation exists in V. volvacea’ a genetical
analysis was carried out. Strain V34 was used and AP-PCR (arbitrarily-primed
polymerase chain reaction) was employed to detect genetic variations. The
released protoplasts from vegetative mycelium were regenerated and the
regeneration frequency in this study was 10.9%. F1 and F2 single spore
progenies of V34 were also isolated. Growth rates of six protoplast
regenerants, ten F1 single spore isolates and ten single spore isolates of two
fertile F1 progenies (F2) were studied by measuring their colony diameters and
biomass gain after 4 days incubation. F1 single spore isolates were cultivated
in compost to examine their fruiting abilities. Results showed that great
variations existed among V34 progenies, in the aspects of colony morphology,
growth rate and fhiiting ability. Protoplast regenerants also showed differences
in colony morphology and growth rate. Two out of ten F1 isolates could fruit
in straw based compost and produced the F2 progenies. Individuals with
different morphologies and growth rates were examined by two arbitrary
primers, M13sq and M13rs. However, none of the primers used in this study
revealed any polymorphism among six randomly choosen protoplast
regenerants and their parental strain V34. As for F1 progenies, both M13sq
and M13rs yielded highly similiar DNA profiles with those ofthe strain V34.
The results from this study confirmed the persistence of phenotypic variations
in V. volvacea. Several possible mechanisms to induce these variations are
discussed. Mitochondrial genome may play an important role.
Page 5
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors: Dr. Siu-Wai
Chiu and Prof. Shu-Ting Chang, who not only gave me the opportunity to
study in the establishment of mushroom Volvariella volvacea, but also have
been leading me and offering me countless ideas, advices and encouragement.
I would also like to thank Dr. J. A. Buswell and Dr. H. S. Kwan for acting as
members of my Thesis Committee. Thanks for their patience, advices and
criticism. Moreover, I would like to send my thanks to my external examiner,
although I do not know yet who he is.
My appreciation also extends to Mr. S. N. Mok for teaching me cultivate
mushrooms, to technicians in Biology Department for technical assistance and
to Ms. M. Y. Yu, Mr. H. X. Wang, Mr Y. J. Cai,Ms S. J. Chapman and all the
other classmates for their helping me overcome many difficulties.
Finally but not means the least, I wish to thank my family, for the support,
encouragement and endless love they always give me.
Page 6
Content Page
List ofTables I
List ofIllustrations 11
List of Abbreviations HI
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Fungal life cycles 1
1.1.1 Heterothallism 1
1.1.1.1 Bipolar incompatibility 2
1.1.1.2 Tetrapolar incompatibility 2
1.1.2 Homothallism 2
1.1.2.1 Primary homothallism 2
1.1.2.2 Secondary homothallism 3
1.2 Biology ofhomothallic Volvariella volvacea 3
1.3 Genetic mechanisms generating variations in fungi 8
1.3.1 Meiotic recombination 8
1.3.2 Mitotic recombination 9
1.3.3 Fungal mitochondrial genomes 11
1.3.3.1 Structure of fungal mitochondrial genome 11
1.3.3.2 Mitochondrial plasmids 14
1.3.3.3 Mitochondrial inheritance 14
1.3.3.4 Mitochondrial polymorphisms 15
1.3.4 Transposons 16
Page 7
1.4 Genetic studies of mushrooms by molecular
and protoplast tools 17
1.4.1 Genetic markers 17
1.4.1.1 Restriction fragement length polymorphisms (RFLPs) 18
1.4.1.2 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 18
1.4.1.2.1 Arbitrarilyprimed PCR (AP-PCR) 20
1.4.2 Protoplasts 23
1.4.2.1 Protoplast isolation - 23
1.4.2.2 Mycolytic enzymes 24
1.4.2.3 Osmotic stabilizers 26
1.4.2.4 Physiological condition ofmycelium 27
1.4.2.5 Protoplast regeneration 28
1.4.2.6 Application ofprotoplasts 28
1.5 Purpose and significance ofthis genetic study
on V. volvacea 29
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods 30
2.1 Organism 30
2.2 Cell cultivation and maintenance 30
2.3 Solutions and chemicals 30
2.3.1 Solutions for DNA isolation 30
2.3.2 Solutions for agarose gel electrophoresis 31
2.3.3 PCR primers and reagents 31
2.4 DNA extraction and purification 31
2.5 Agarose gel electrophoresis 32
2.6 Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) 33
2.7 Protoplast isolation and regeneration 34
Page 8
2.7.1 Preparation ofprotoplasts 34
2.7.2 Regeneration of protoplasts 34
2.8 Single spore isolation and germination 35
2.9 Growth rate measurement 36
2.9.1 Colony diameter measurement 36
2.9.2 Biomass gain measurement 37
Chapter 3 Results 38 3.1 Genomic DNA extraction - 38
3.2 Genetic analyses of V34 and its progenies 3 8
3.2.1 Protoplast regenerants ^ 8
3.2.1.1 Protoplast preparation 3 8
3.2.1.2 Protoplast regeneration 42
3.2.1.3 Morphology of V34 protoplast regenerants 42
3.2.1.4 Growth rate measurement 44
3.2.1.5 AP-PCR analysis ofV34 protoplast regenerants 44
3.2.2 V34 single spore isolates (SSIs) - F1 progenies 48
3.2.2.1 Single spore isolation and germination 48
3.2.2.2 Morphology o fF l progenies 48
3.2.2.3 Growth rate measurement 48
3.2.2.4 AP-PCR analysis of 10 V34 single spore isolates 51
3.2.2.5 Fruiting ability of F1 progenies 51
3.2.3 Single spore isolates from F1 progenies-F2 progenies 54
3.2.3.1 Colony morphology and growth rate 54
Chapter 4 Discussion ^^
4.1 Protoplast isolation and regeneration 59
4.2 Phenotypic variations in Volvariella volvacea 61
4.2.1 Colony morphology 61
^ ~ — I •ii ^ M—^ ^—I M^—^M I M^MMMMTmMITMffMlllHIII III i|l|iHIWIillll|i|ii IWH|ll_WHiUMU'mimi_I
Page 9
4.2.2 Growth rate 61
4.2.3 Fruiting ability 62
4.3 Genetic mechanisms for phenotypic variations
in V. volvacea 63
4.4 AP-PCR analyses 65
4.5 Possible sources ofvariations 66
4.5.1 Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) 67
4.5.2 Spontaneous mutations - 67
Conclusion 69
References 70
Page 10
List ofIllustrations
Fig. 1 Haploid life cycle of Volvariella volvacea (Chiu, 1993). 7
Fig. 2 Meiotic crossing-over in fungi
(modified from Bos & Swart, 1995). 10
Fig. 3 Recombination during mitosis in fungi
(modified from Bos & Swart,1995). 12
Fig. 4 A typical scan spectrum ofgenomic DNA sample from
Volvariella volvacea strain V34 and its progenies. 39
Fig. 5 Agarose gel showing the genomic DNAs from
Volvariella volvacea isolates. 40
Fig. 6 Protoplast yield from different ages ofmycelia
and different times of exposure to lytic enzymes. 41
Fig. 7 Colony morphologies of V34 protoplast regenerants. 43
Fig. 8 The biomass gain by six V34 protoplast regenerants
after 4-day incubation. 45
Fig. 9 AP-PCR profiles of six protoplast regenerants of
V. volvacea V34 using primer M13sq. 46
Fig. 10 AP-PCR profiles of six protoplast regenerants of
V. volvacea V34 using primer M13rs. 47
Fig. 11 Colony morphologies of V34 single
spore isolates (F1). 49
Fig. 12 The biomass gain by ten V34 single spore
Page 11
isolates (F1) after 4-day incubation. 50
Fig. 13 AP-PCR profiles of 10 single spore isolates
ofV34 using primer M13sq. 52
Fig. 14 AP-PCR profiles of 10 single spore isolates
of V34 using primer M13rs. 53
Fig. 15 Colony morphologies of single spore
isolates ofNo.33 (the F2 progeny). 55
Fig. 16 Colony morphologies of single spore
isolates ofNo. 10 (the F2 progeny). 56
Fig. 17 The biomass gain by ten single spore
isolates of No. 10 isolate after 4-day incubation. 57
Fig. 18 The biomass gain by ten single spore
isolates ofNo. 33 isolate after 4-day incubation. 58
Page 12
List of Tables
Table 1 Nomenclature for mitochondrial genes
(Hudespeth, 1992). 13
Table 2 Properties of RFLPs and RAPDs/AP-PCR
(modified from Rafalski & Tingey,1993). 22
Table 3 Protoplast isolation system in some edible
mushrooms (sources: Selitrennikoff& Bloomfield,
1984; Kitamoto et al., 1988; Peberdy, 1991). 25
Table 4. The regeneration frequency of protoplasts 42
Table 5. The colony diameters ofprotoplast regenerants
(4 day cultures) 42
Table 6. Germination frequency of V34 spores 48
Table 7. The colony diameters of single spore
isolates (SSIs) (4 day cultures) 48
Table 8. Fruiting test of F1 progeny 51
Table 9. The colony diameters of single spore isolates of
No.lO F1 progeny (4 day cultures) 54
Table 10. The colony diameters ofsingle spore isolates of
No.33 F1 progeny (4 day cultures) 54
Page 13
List of Abbreviations
AP-PCR: Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction
bp: base pair
CM: Complete medium
dNTPs: deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates
EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid
Kb: Kilobase pairs
Mb: Megabase pairs
MCM: Mannitol complete medium
MI: First meiotic division
MtDNA: Mitochondrial DNA
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction
PD: Potato dextrose broth
PDA: Potato dextrose agar
RAPDs: Random amplified polymorphic DNAs
RFLPs: Restriction fragement length polymorphisms
SDS: Sodium dodecyl sulfate
SSI: Single spore isolate
Tris: Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane
Page 14
Chapter 1. Introduction
1.1 Fimgal life cycles
The prospect for breeding programmes ofany organisms depends upon an
understanding ofthe life cycle and this is as essential for lower organisms
as it is for the most highly evolved organisms. Numerous kinds of life
cycles have been revealed in fungi. Different fungi showed variations in
their nuclear components at different stages in their life cycles: the
niunber of nuclei per cell, the ploidy and genotype may vary greatly
(Elliott, 1972). But the basic life cycle of the higher fungi is: a spore
germinates to form mycelium which in tum bears fruiting bodies and from
fhiiting bodies spores are produced.
Sexuality of Basidiomycetes was first described by Bensaude (1918) in
Coprinus fimetarius and Kniep (1920) in Schizophyllum commune (cited
in Miles, 1991). Fungi can be classified as homothallic (self-fertile) or as
heterothallic (self-sterile). According to Burnett (1975), homothallism is
probably the most common mode of sexual reproduction in fungi as a
whole, but in higher fungi, it represents only about 10% of all species
investigated. The other 90% shows heterothallism.
1.1.1 Heterothallism
Cross-mating between homokaryotic mycelia is necessary to establish the
fertile mycelium in heterothallic species (Tanaka & Koga,1972; Raper,
1976). The three phases of sexual reproduction, plasmogamy, karyogamy
and meiosis, are found in their life histories. Mating in heterothallic
species is determined by one of the two incompatibility mechanisms:
bipolar and tetrapolar (Raper, 1966; Fincham et aL, 1979; Elliott, 1982).
1
Page 15
fotroduction
1.1.1.1 Bipolar incompatibility
There is only one single mating type factor which in most cases possesses
two alleles, A and a. It is also referred as unifactorial system. Jn the case
of biallelic system, the two mating types segregate in a ratio of 1:1 in a
cross of A X a matings. Li Basidiomycetes, about 25% species are
unifactorial heterothallic (Bumett, 1975). Lentinula edodes shows this
mating system (Chang, 1993b).
1.1.1.2 Tetrapolar incompatibility
There are two unlinked mating type factors, A and B, each of which has
multiple alleles. It is also referred as bifactorial system. Four mating
types: AxBx, AxBy, AyBx and AyBy are produced in a 1:1:1:1 ratio in a
cross oiAxBx X AyBy. Only combinations that are heteroallelic for both
mating type factors are fertile. Li Basidiomycetes, 65% are bifactorial
heterothallic (Burnett, 1975). Agaricus bitorquis shows this mating
system (Chang, 1993b).
1.1.2 Homothallism
Homothallic species can complete their life cycle by a single spore
without mating (Raper, 1966; Chang & Yau,1971; Elliott, 1972).
Plasmogamy is not required for karyogamy and meiosis to take place.
There are two forms ofhomothallism: primary and secondary.
1.1.2.1 Primary homothallism
Primary homothallic species produce fmiting bodies by a single spore
with a single postmeiotic nucleus. The presence ofincompatibility factors
has not yet been detected. Volvariella volvacea, one of the conunonly
2
Page 16
fotroduction
cultivated mushrooms, is thought to be primary homothallic (Chang &
Yau, 1971).
1.1.2.2 Secondary homothallism
Secondary homothallic species produce fruiting bodies by a single spore
possessing two compatible nuclei. It involves incompatibility factors.
Agaricus bisporus displays this kind oflife cycle (Chang, 1993b).
1.2 Biology of homothallic Volvariella volvacea
Mushrooms are generally considered as a special group of higher fungi,
which are fleshy macrofungi with distinctive fruiting bodies producing,
bearing and discharging spores (Chang, 1993a). Most of them are edible
and have served as human food throughout the history because of their
nutrition and delicacy, and some for medical or tonic contributions. It is
now well known that mushrooms have a high protein content of good
quality, which contains the nine amino acids essential to human diet,
especially rich in lysine and leucine which are lacking in most staple
cereal foods. Mushrooms also contain many vitamins, fiber and minerals
and they are low in calories, sodium, fat and cholesterol (Chang, 1980).
As with the development of the society, demanding for mushrooms is
increasing fast. From 1986-1991, world production of cultivated
mushrooms went up by 96.4% (Chang, 1993b). In addition, mushrooms
are also playing an important role in biological cycling in nature through
breaking down lignocellulosic plant debris and agricultural, industrial and
forest wastes. Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, the main components
of these wastes which are relatively resistant to biological degradation,
can be degraded by a wide range ofextracellular hydrolytic and oxidative
*
3
Page 17
fotroduction
enzymes produced by mushrooms (Wood & Fermor, 1982; Wood, 1984).
Therefore, cultivation of mushrooms can provide a solution to many
problems including protein shortage, resource recovery and reuse, and
environmental pollution.
Volvariella volvacea, commonly known as the Chinese straw mushroom
or paddy straw mushroom, belongs to the family Pluteaceae of the
Basidiomycetes. It is an edible mushroom ofthe tropics and subtropics. It
has long been cultivated in China and the first record can be traced back
to 1700 (Chang, 1977). Because it grows at the relatively high
temperature range of 30-36°C, it is also called "warm mushroom" and is
very suitable for South Asian countries. Nowadays, this mushroom is
extensively cultivated in Thailand, Lidonesia, Vietnam, Philippines and
Malaysia. China is the top producer (Chang, 1993c). Following Agaricus
bisporus, Lentinula edodes, Pleurotus spp. and Auricularia spp; V.
volvacea is the fifth most important cultivated mushroom in the world
(Chang, 1993b).
Li nature, V. volvacea is found growing on rotten paddy straw during the
rainy seasons in tropics and subtropics. Any highly rich carbohydrate-
containing substrate, including cotton waste, bagasse, banana leaves,oil
pahn pericarp, sorghum straw and fiber crop wastes, can also be used to
cultivate this mushroom (Chang, 1993c). K volvacea grows very fast.
From spawn to mature fhiiting bodies it takes only 10 days under
favorable conditions. Thus it is considered as one of the easiest
mushrooms to grow. However, the difficulty to obtain high, consistant
yield and the inability to enhance its post-harvest shelf life make V.
volvacea also the most difficult to handle. Its position in the world
popularity list dropped from the third in 1986 to the fifth in 1991 (Chang,
1993b).
4
Page 18
fotroduction
V. volvacea is not only highly nutritious but also possesses a fine texture
and soft flesh. Many people even prefer it to the cultivated white
mushroom, A. bisporus. Li Hong Kong, V. volvacea is the most popular
fresh mushroom. However, most research activities of V. volvacea have
been carried out only in the past thirty years. Our knowledge of this
mushroom is much less compared to that o f^ . bisporus.
V. volvacea is a large pileate fungus with a dark gray cap (Chang & Ymi,
1971). Li its maturing fruiting bodies, the volva is well developed and
remains distinct. This trait makes V. volvacea very different from many
other mushrooms such as L. edodes, A. bisporus and P. sajor-caju
(Chang, 1991).
The traditional cultivating substrate for V. volvacea was paddy straw. Jn
1971, cotton waste was first introduced as a material to grow V. volvacea
and resulted in a significant increase (2-3 folds) of production and more
stable yield (Yau & Chang,1972). The substrate-degradative enzymes of
V. volvacea have been studied (Wang, 1982; Buswell et aL, 1993; Cai,
1994). These studies showed that V. volvacea produces several enzymes
for the hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose, including endo- and
exoglucanases, p-glucosidase, xylanase and p-xylosidase but lack the
ability to synthesize phenol-oxidizing and lignin-transfonning enzymes.
These results supported that V. volvacea grows well on a rich cellulosic
substrate such as cotton waste, in which the amount of lignified
components is negligible.
The initial information on life history of V. volvacea came from a study of
nuclear behaviour in basidia and a cytological study of its spore
germination (Chang & Ghu,1969; Chang, 1969). V. volvacea possessed
multinucleate hyphae and the clamp connections were absent. This is
quite similiar to A. bisporus. Basidiospores of V. volvacea typically were
5
Page 19
fotroduction
uninucleate (Chang & Chu,1969). However, the production of fruiting
bodies by both sexual basidiospores and asexual multinucleate
chlamydospores suggested that this mushroom may be a primary
homothallic fungus (Chang, 1969). Since 1969,Chang and colleagues
have showed that a single basidiospore of V. volvacea can germinate and
fortn fruiting bodies by itself without any mating (Chang & Yau,1971;
Li, 1977; Chang et al., 1981; Li, 1991). Thus V. volvacea is thought to be
primary homothallic. -
Basidiospores of V. volvacea were also studied with respect to their
ploidy, using gamma radiation as a tool (Quaye, 1986). The radiation
survival curve implied the haploidy of basidiospores. Royse et al. (1987)
also deduced a haploid nature of basidiospores of K volvacea from the
segregation of isozyme markers of a constructed heterokaryon. The
haploid life cycle in V. volvacea was also demonstrated from
microspectrophotometric measurements of DNA content per nucleus and
observations of nuclear behaviour (Chiu, 1993) (Fig. 1). A haploid
uninucleate basidiospore germinates to haploid multinucleate mycelium
and forms fruiting bodies. Then, a uninucleate hymenial initial divides
mitotically to a binucleate condition, and karyogamy leads to a transient
diploid stage. DNA replicates to 4N content. Basidiospores are formed
through meiosis and the life cycle is completed. Despite of these
evidences, genetics of the life cycle of V. volvacea is still uncertain, in
comparison with other commonly cultivated mushrooms such as A.
bisporus, L edodes andP. sajor-caju (Chang, 1993b).
6
Page 20
fotroduction
^x-^ZT^ Jk^" , 1 A v k - "kMki r N - - r
ftrRk )丄 ^ = ^ ^ ^ V _ y ^
\ Mciosis Fruiiing / \ ^ and >< m0rph0gcncsi5 Z
\ ^ sporulalion f ] y^
^ ^ _ ^ Fig. 1 Haploid Hfe cycle of Volvariella volvacea (Chiu, 1993). Phenotypic variations among the progenies in another straw mushroom,
Volvariella bombycina, in the aspects of colony morphology, growth rate 7
Page 21
fotroduction
and fruiting ability were observed (Elliott & Challen,1985; Chiu &
Chang, 1987). Variations among single spore isolates of V. volvacea were
also found by some of the previous studies (Chang & Yau,1971; Li &
Chang, 1978; Chang et al., 1981; Li, 1991). Elliott and Challen (1985)
proposed a tetraploid-diploid secondarily homothallic life cycles for V.
bombycina and V. volvacea. However, Chiu and Chang (1987) concluded
that V. bombycina had a haploid primary homothallic life cycle through
cytological and genetical analysis using auxotrophic mutants. Because of
the lack in genetic markers, it is difficult to fmd out where and how do
these variations happen in V. volvacea. Furthermore, strain preservation
and improvement of V. volvacea through breeding efforts has also been
hindered due to a lack of basic genetic information to develop a rational
breeding programme (Royse & May,1992).
1.3 Genetic mechanisms generating variations in fungi
Most groups of fungi appear to be haploid for the major part of their life
cycle. At the sexual stage, karyogamy takes place in specialized
binucleate hyphal cells and is followed by meiosis. Additional mitotic
divisions may happen and result in haploid and multiple nuclei in spores
(Raper, 1966; Fincham et al., 1979).
1.3.1 Meiotic recombination
The meiotic mechanism in eukaryotes is essentially similar. Meiosis
consists oftwo divisions, the first ofwhich is special (reductional), while
the second resembles a mitotic division (equational). Li the prophase of
the first meiotic division (MI) the homologous chromosomes synapse to
form bivalents and later they become thicker by contraction. During
synapsis, the four chromatids of a pair of chromosomes can undergo
8
Page 22
fotroduction
exchange and is called crossingover (Bos & Swart,1995) (Fig. 2).
Crossingover between sister chromatids is genetically o fno consequence,
since sister chromatids are identical and no recombinants can occur.
Crossingover between nonsister chromatids is of genetic importance, if
the homologous chromosomes carry different alleles at one or more loci.
Such crossingovers result in recombination of genes that are located on
the same chromosome. Genes that are on the same chromosome belong to
one linkage group, but if two genes are located far from each other, the
frequency of crossingover can be high enough to show independent
segregation.
hi the anaphase ofMI, the homologous chromosomes segregate to the two
poles of the cell, hi this way, a reassortment of non-homologous
chromosomes is possibly achieved.
1.3.2 Mitotic recombination
During mitosis, homologous chromosomes behave independently. At
metaphase the chromosomes move to the equatorial plane and the sister
chromatids separate during the anaphase, resulting in two daughter cells
with the original number of chromosomes. Jn this way, each daughter cell
receives the same genetic information. Usually the homologous
chromosomes do not pair during mitosis. However, there is genetic
evidence that homologous chromosomes can exchange parts of nonsister
chromatids, probably during the four-strand stage. There is also evidence
that unequal crossing-over can occur during mitosis, resulting in
duplications O^ga and Roper, 1968).
*
9
Page 23
fotroduction
a b + = = = ¢ = = :
“ ^ 丨。 [1] (21
" I + + c -
Crossing over events In region G e n o t y p e of progeny
= = = = = - a b + n
- + + c
n 1 ^ + +
= = = 1 + b c
n 2 a b c
, 2 + + +
_ = 1 2 a + c 0 丨’‘
, 1,2 + b +
Fig. 2 Meiotic crossing-over in fiingi. One pair of homologous
chromosomes is drawn to illustrate the process of meiotic crossing-over,
a, b,c represent different genes. + represents the wild type allele of a
particular gene. Homologous chromosomes are tightly paired during the
first meiotic division and exchange between chromatids take place
(modified from Bos & Swart,1995).
In somatic diploid nuclei, two recombination processes may occur:
mitocic crossingover between nonsister chromatids of homologous
chromosomes and haploidization (Kafer, 1977; Papa, 1977; Bos and
10
Page 24
fotroduction
Swart, 1995). Mitotic crossingover results in recombinant chromatids.
Haploidization results from mitotic nondisjunction of sister chromatids
which leads to aneuploid nuclei and by successive losses of chromosomes
ultimately to haploid nuclei. During haploidization, genes on the same
chromosome segregate as a linkage group. Mitotic crossingover results in
recombination of genes within a linkage group (Bos & Swart,1995) (Fig.
3).
Mitotic recombination has been found (Bos & Swart,1995). However,
the frequency of mitotic crossingover is much lower than that of meiotic
crossingover. During meiosis, many crossingover events occurred in each
meiocyte, whereas in artificially induced unstable diploids ofNeurospora 3 •
crassa the mitotic crossingover occurred at a frequency of 10' (Smith,
1974).
1.3.3 Fungal mitochondrial genomes
1.3.3.1 Structure offungal mitochondrial genome
Mitochondrial genome refers to nucleic acids found in organelle
mitochondrion (Hudspeth, 1992). This kind of extrachromosomal genome
is invariably present as simple DNA molecules, not as the chromosomes
of the nucleus which have bound proteins. As a general rule,
mitochondrial DNAs are circular and encode a limited set of gene
products which are constituents either of the mitochondrial translation
apparatus, or of the respiratory chain and oxidative ATP synthase
complexes. A minimum set of 22 tRNAs is sufficient to translate 20
amino acids. All other genes related to mitochondrial functions are
usually nuclear-encoded (Crossman and Hudspeth, 1985; Hudespeth,
1992) (Table 1).
11
Page 25
fotroduction
Table 1 Nomenclature for mitochondrial genes (Hudespeth, 1992).
Gene Function Translational apparatus
ml L-RNA large ribosomal subunit RNA ms S-RNA small ribosomal subunit RNA tsl tRNA synthesis locus varl small ribosomal subunit protein S-5 small ribosomal subunit protein
Respiratory chain 一
coxl COI, oxi3 cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 cox2 COII, oxil cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 cox3 COIII, oxi2 cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 cob cytb apocytochrome b ndhl urfl ND1 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 ndh2 urf2 ND2 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 ndh3 urf3 ND3 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 ndh4 urf4 ND4 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 ndh41 urf4L ND4L NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L ndh5 urf5 ND5 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 ndh6 urf6 ND6 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6
ATP synthase
atp6 oli2, 4 ATP synthase subunit 6 atp8 urfA6L, aapl ATP synthase subunit 8 atp9 mal,olil, 3 ATP synthase subunit 9
General
ORF open reading frame URF unidentified reading frame
12
Page 26
fotroduction
+ A B + A B Q= = • g= =
'0- 0= = = _ ^ _ _ ^ _ _ _ _ =
C + + C + B
\ — 0 = 0= = _
[non-d is junct ion 1
aneupioids 2n + 1 , 2n -1
/ \
+ A B / \ Q= / \ |J= , � 0= I '3- _ I
+ A B C + +
non-dis junct ion diploid haploidization
Fig. 3 Recombination during mitosis in fungi. One pair of homologous
chromosomes is drawn to illustrate the recombination events during
mitosis. A, B, C represent different genes with + representing the wild
type allele. (1) Mitotic crossing-over leads to homozygosity distal ofthe
point of exchange. (2) Nondisjunction of chromatids results in aneuploids
which will finally lead to a diploid or a haploid nucleus (modified from
Bos & Swart, 1995).
]ji comparison to the nuclear genome sizes determined by electrophoretic
karyotyping, of which the largest genome of 47 Mb reported for
13
Page 27
fotroduction
Neurospora crassa (Orbach et al., 1988) and the smallest genome of 13.8
Mb for Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Smith et al., 1987), the
mitochondrial DNAs offungi are very small and usually exhibit large size
variation: from a minimum of 17.6 kb in Schizosaccharomyces pombe to
a maximum of 172 kb 'mAgaricus bitorquis (Hudspeth, 1992).
As a common concept, mtDNAs are circular molecules. But, linear
exceptions have been discovered. Linear mitochondrial DNAs have been
found with high frequency in the yeast genera Williopsis and Pichia by
pulsed field gel electrophoresis (Fukuhara et al., 1993).
1.3.3.2 Mitochondrial plasmids
Mitochondrial plasmids exist widely in higher fungi (Arganoza et al.,
1994) and they are regarded as genetic elements in the mitochondrion. M
Neurospora intermedia, the presence of a linear 9.6 kb Kalilo
mitochondrial plasmid is associated with senescence (Bertrand et al.,
1985; Myers et al., 1989) and in K crassa, senescence is caused by
another linear mitochondrial plasmid, marDNA, which is 7 kb long (Court
et al., 1991; Court & Betrand,1992). The cause of aging is through the
disruption of mtDNA function as a result of plasmid insertion and
progressive replacement of mtDNA (Myers et al., 1989). Jn contrast, in
Podospora anserina, a linear plasmid pAL2-l can integrate into mtDNA
and is involved in the expression oflongevity (Hermanns et al., 1994).
1.3.3.3 Mitochondrial inheritance
The inheritance of mtDNA is usually matemal as demonstrated in
Phytophthora infestans by Whittaker and coworkers (1994). But complex
situations exist in other fimgi. bi Neurospora, matemal, patemal and
recombinant mitochondrial DNAs were segregated in the progeny (Lee &
14
Page 28
fotroduction
Tayior, 1993; Yang & Griffiths,1993). Li Agaricus bisporus,
mitochondrial DNA is mostly inherited uniparentally (Jin et al., 1992).
1.3.3.4 Mitochondrial polymoiphisms
MtDNA in higher fungi is usually present at high copy number
(Grossman & Hudspeth,1985). Polymorphisms of mtDNA are
conmionly encountered in many fungi. As for any genetic polymorphism,
mitochondrial variants can be associated with disruption of functions
leading to phenotypic abnormality, or they can be apparently neutral with
no detectable phenotypic effect (Griffiths et al., 1995). Length mutations
are prevalent in the mtDNA variation. Many studies showed that the basis
for mitochondrial polymorphisms could come from nucleotide pair
substitution, deletion, insertion, inversion and the presence or absence of
free plasmids or plasmid inserts (Griffiths et al., 1995).
MtDNA polymorphisms have been used extensively in population
analysis; Fukuda and colleagues (1994) studied the restriction fragment
length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in mtDNA in 51 wild strains from
different geographical populations of Lentinula edodes and their result
suggested that L. edodes included some distinct groups with genetic
divergence in both mitochondrial and nuclear genomes.
Nevertheless, the inheritance of mitochondria and nuclei is independent
as demonstrated in Agaricus bitorquis and might be dependent on
nuclear-mitochondrial interaction (Hintz et al., 1988). Further studies are
needed,therefore, to incorporate the genetic relatedness among strains of
a population based on nuclear phenotypes and mitochondrial phenotypes.
1.3.4 Transposons
Transposable elements or transposons are typically a piece of DNA that
can move from one position to another and that consists of one or several
15
Page 29
fotroduction
genes in the middle flanked by end sequences that are the same as each
other. Within an end segment, there may be shorter repetitive sequences
(terminal repeats) which are believed to help in the insertion and excision
ofthe element (Ayala & Kiger,1984).
The first transposable element discoverd was described in maize by
Barbara McClintock in 1940s. She was able to show that certain genetic
elements within the maize genome modified the expression of other genes
at adjacent sites and from time to time disappear and reappear at different
locations. Later in 1960s, transposable elements were discovered in E.
coli as the cause of one type of spontaneous mutation. These mutations
completely abolished the expression of the gene in which they occurred.
Since then various transposons have been identified in many species
including yeast, fruitfly and mice (Ayala & Kiger,1984). Transposition
seems to happen notjust within nuclear DNA, but also between the genes
of nuclei and mitochondria. Transposons exhibit the following genetic
properties: (i) the ability to transpose and the functions required for
transposition are coded by themselves; (ii) precise excision; (iii) produce
gene mutations such as deletions and invertions; and (iv) interaction
between other genetic elements and chromosomes. Because of these
characteristics, especially that they can move around in the genome,it is
very difficult to detect them.
1.4 Genetic studies ofmushrooms by molecular and protoplast tools
1.4.1 Genetic markers
The aim of mushroom breeders is to bring together an optimum
combination of genes that control characteristics of commercial
importance (Elliott, 1982; Miles & Chang, 1986). Detailed genetic
information is essential for the establishment of a breeding programme.
16
Page 30
fotroduction
A genetic research requires reliable markers. Morphological markers or
physiological markers do not possess the reliability because they are
usually affected by different environmental and/or nutritional factors.
Genetic markers obey the Mendelian Laws and can serve as reference
points in the genome. These markers are widely used in fungal genetic
studies to quantify genetic variability among strains and to track the
process ofinheritance (Anderson, 1991).
Auxotrophic markers were the first to be used to establish the basic facts
of life cycle of the most commonly cultivated mushroom, A. bisporus
(Raper et al., 1972; Elliott, 1985). However, the number of auxotrophs
currently available is very small because of the difficulties to obtain them
and the process to induce such mutations may result in unintended
damage to the strain (Anderson, 1991). More recently, genetic markers
that are naturally existing have been detected and developed in some
fungi (Royse and May, 1982; Kerrigan & Ross, 1989; Wang et al., 1991).
These markers include allozyme and DNA based markers.
AUozymes are enzymes differing in electrophoretic mobility as the result
of allelic differences in a single gene (Royse & May,1992). Allozyme
electrophoresis has been used to study the life histories of mushrooms
since the early 1980s (May & Royse,1981) and has shown its ability to
analyse genetic information (Spear et al., 1983; Royse et al.’ 1987;
Bowden et al, 1991). However, the availability of allozyme markers is
also small and the expression of such markers is still under physiological
and genetic controls (Anderson, 1991). Nowadays, emphasis is placed on
DNA based markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms
(RFLPs), random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) and arbitrarily
primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR). They provide direct
17
Page 31
fotroduction
examination of the genome and have practically inexhaustible source
(Anderson, 1991).
1.4.1.1 Restriction fragement length polymorphisms (RFLPs)
RFLPs are based on variations in banding patterns produced by restriction
endonuclease and brought about by point mutations or rearrangements.
Allelic relationship between individuals is shown by hybridization
patterns of enzyme-digested genomic “ DNA with specific probe(s)
(Southern, 1975; Anderson, 1991). It is one ofthe conmionly used DNA
markers in genetic studies. Li mushrooms, such as A. bisporus and L
edodes, RFLPs have been used to analyse DNA polymorphisms and
construct genetic maps (Bostein et al., 1980; Castle et al., 1987; KuUcami,
1991).
1.4.1.2 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
12 years ago (1983),a novel method, the polymerase chain reaction
(PCR), was discovered that permits the in vitro replication of selected
nucleic acids (Mullis and Faloona, 1987). It is so sensitive that even a
single gene copy can be detected following nuclei acid amplification
(Mullis etal; 1986; Mullis & Faloona,1987; Bej, 1991).
The PCR components include: the segment of DNA to be amplified
(double-stranded DNA or cDNA from RNA, referred to as template); two
single stranded olignonucleotide primers flanking the target region; a
DNA polymerase; four deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), a
suitable buffer and magnesium ions.
The typical method consists of repetitive cycles ofthree steps:
18
Page 32
fotroduction
(i) DNA denaturation: double-stranded template DNA is dissociated to
single-stranded DNA by incubation at a high temperature (usually 94°C
or 95°C).
(ii) Primer annealing: two primers arnieal to their complementary
template strands at a lower temperature of30°C - 60 °C.
(iii) Chain extension: primers are extended through addition of
nucleotides to their 3’ ends by the action ofthe polymerase at 72°C.
PCR products can mostly be resolved on agarose gel or polyacrylamide
gel (Foster et al., 1993). By exponentially amplifying a target sequence,
PCR significantly enhances the possibility of detecting target gene in
complex mixtures of DNA and also faciliates the cloning and sequencing
ofgenes. Amplification ofDNA by PCR have been applied in many areas
of biological research, including molecular biology, biotechnology and
medicine (Kwok & Sninsky,1989; Amheim et al., 1990; Ochman et al.,
1990;WelshWa/., 1990).
In fungi, one of the first use of PCR was the amplification of ribosomal
DNA sequences and the determination of their evolutionary relationships
OVhite et al., 1989). Now it has spread to many areas such as cloning,
sequencing, gene manipulation and so on.
1.4.1.2.1 Arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR)
Conventional PCR requires prior information on target gene sequences
and thus restricts the use range of this technique. Many modifications
have been developed shortly after the first report of PCR and expanded
considerably its utilization (Foster et al., 1993). The arbitrarily primed
PCR (AP-PCR), or random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs),
which use non-specific primer(s) to produce DNA fingerprints relieved
the requirements of any prior sequence information and thus used in
19
Page 33
Introduction
many organisms, especially mushrooms about which genetic information
is scarce.
AP-PCR and RAPDs were devised in 1990 by Welsh and McClelland and
Williams et al., respectively. These methods use arbitrary primer(s) and
low stringency conditions for primer annealing. RAPDs uses short
oligodeoxynucleotide primer which contains 50-80% G+C composition
and no palindromic sequence, while AP-PCR has no restriction on the
chosen primers. These primers are now available commercially. For
example, Operon Technologies (Alameda, California) sells kits of 20
different random 10-mers. The lower primer annealing temperature
allows various regions of the target DNA to be amplified (Welsh et al.,
1990; Williams et al., 1990). The polymorphisms between individuals
result from sequence differences in one or both ofthe primer binding sites
and are visible as the presence or absence of a particular AP-PCR or
RAPDs band (Rafalski & Tingey,1993).
AP-PCR and RAPDs have been widely used in fingerprinting genomes,
analysing linkage relationships and mapping, phylogenic studies and
detecting genetic variations. Various organisms have been studied,
ranging from bacteria (Fekete et al., 1992) to fimgi (Wyss & Bonfante,
1993), plants (Rafalski & Tingey,1993) and animals including human
being (Welsh & McClelland,1990).
Jn mushrooms, AP-PCR and RAPDs have been used in the genetic studies
of A. bisporus, L edodes, Coprinus cinereus and Volvariella volvacea
(Kerrigan et al., 1992; Khush et al,, 1992; Kwan et al., 1992; Pukkila,
1992; Chen, 1994).
Kerrigan et al. (1992) generated 64 natural genetic markers, including 2
allozyme markers, 24 RFLPs markers and 38 RAPDs markers. By
following the transmission of these 64 markers in the offspings, they
20
M^^M^^^^—^—^^^M^^^^^——^MI^^———^^—^^^^^^^^—^^M^^—IM^^——^—^M^M^———WWB^mni • 111Hlli— \Wili_ || I _W
Page 34
fotroduction
demonstrated conventional meiosis behaviour in A. bisporus in which
both independent assortment and joint segregation of markers occurred
but crossing-over was infrequent. They also constructed the genetic map
of this mushroom. For the first time, the genome oiA. bisporus could be
surveyed extensively and loci determining economically important traits
in this fungi could be localized.
This study 'mA, bisporus, as well as another study conducted by Khush et
al in 1992, in which they showed the use of RAPDs markers in strain
differentiation and the identification and isolation of
homokaryons/heterokaryons, proved the value of RAPDs in mushroom
genetic research.
Chiu et al (1992) had demonstrated from their studies with L edodes by
AP-PCR that AP-PCR can be used to:
1. Typing, i.e., strain identification,
2. Confirmation ofprotoplast fusion products%brids,
3. Identification ofspecies-specific DNA markers,
4. Establishing monokaryon-dikaryon relationships,
5. Demonstration of dedikaryonization,
6. Generation ofpolymorphic molecular markers which may be used as
genetic markers in progeny analysis.
AP-PCR and RAPDs share the same methodology and in comparison
with RFLPs, they have several advantages (Rafalski & Tingey,1993)
(Table 2). First, the results are rapid, the whole analysis, from reaction to
gel, can be completed within one working day, while RFLPs requires at
least three days. Second, the method is simple. There is no hybridization
or detection techniques required. Third, they do not need gene library or
any form of a clone required as a probe. Fourth, AP-PCR and RAPDs
analysis requires very small quantities ofDNA, whereas for RFLPs, much
21
Page 35
Introduction
larger amount of DNA with good quality is required. With these
advantages, especially the ignorance of any background DNA
information, AP-PCR and RAPDs have great potential in the genetic
studies ofmushrooms which are still lacking ofbasic information.
In V. volvacea, use of AP-PCR or RAPDs was just started in 1994 by
Chen to distinguish three V. volvacea strains: V14, V22 and V34. Other
applications are not found yet.
Table 2 Properties of RFLPs and RAPDs/AP-PCR (modified from
Rafalski & Tingey,1993).
RFLPs RAPDs/AP-PCR principle
endonuclease restriction DNA amplifacation with southern blotting random primers hybridization
type of polymorphism single base changes single base changes insertions insertions deletions deletions
genomic abundance high very high
level of polymorphism medium medium
dominance codominant dominant
amount ofDNA required 2-10 ig 10-25 ng
sequence information required? no no
radioactive detection required? yes/no no
development costs medium low
start-up costs mediumMgh ] ^
22
^•^^—^^M^^—^M^——^——^^^M——l^^^——I^^MM^1^—^^M^^—————^^^^^^M^M^——W—M—_l_ l| i^_ I I IMI I_ l| i i_ l l_ l«HI I» l 111 1111inmonF****-"'—™--
Page 36
fotroduction
]n V. volvacea, use of AP-PCR or RAPDs was just started in 1994 by
Chen to distinguish three K volvacea strains: V14, V22 and V34. Other
applications are not found yet.
1.4.2 Protoplasts
One of the most significant development of mushroom biotechnology
during recent years has been the isolation, culture and fusion of
protoplasts (Cocking, 1972). Neurospora crassa was the first reported
filamentous ftmgus from which protoplasts were isolated (Emerson &
Emerson, 1958; Bachmami & Bonner,1959). Since then, protoplasts have
been obtained from more and more filamentous fungi (Meinecke, 1960;
Moore, 1975; Chang et al., 1984; Kitamoto et al., 1988, Tamova et al.,
1993) and these structures have become the tool in several key areas of
fungal biology such as transformation, cell wall synthesis (Peberdy,
1995).
1.4.2.1 Protoplast isolation
Protoplast isolation has been described in many Basidiomycetes including
the commonly cultivated edible mushrooms A. bisporus, L edodes, P.
sajor-caju and V. volvacea (Chang et aL, 1984; Peberdy & Fox^ 1991;
Peberdy, 1995).
The basic system for protoplast isolation includes (Peberdy, 1995):
i) fungal material: cells, mycelium or spores;
ii) an enzyme mixture that digests the hyphal wall;
iii) an inorganic salt or organic solute to make the solution isotonic with
the cytoplasmic contents and
iv) a buffer.
23
Page 37
fotroduction
Enzyme, osmotic stabilizer and buffer are all subject to variation for
different fungal materials (Peberdy, 1991). A variety of systems used in
the most commonly cultivated mushrooms is listed in Table 3.
1.4.2.2 Mycolytic enzymes
Mycolytic enzymes which digest away fungal cell wall to liberate
protoplasts are mostly of microbial origin (Peberdy, 1991). Liitially,
strains of Streptomyces species isolated from soil samples were found to
cause lysis of fungal cell walls and were used in the production of lytic
enzymes. Later the lytic activity in Trichoderma harzianum was also
discovered (Peberdy, 1985). Most enzymes produced in recent years have
been derived from strains of Trichoderma harzianum. Some lytic
enzymes which have been used to release protoplasts are compiled in
Table 3.
Mbrmation on wall composition in edible mushrooms is very scanty
(Mendoza et al., 1987; Peberdy, 1991). The current available results
revealed that the major components were chitin, p-glucan and a-glucan,
indicating the requirement of corresponding hydrolytic enzymes for
digestion.
Lytic enzymes usually exist as a mixture of several hydrolytic enzymes,
mainly chitinase, P-glucanase and a-glucanase (Hamlyn et al., 1981).
Studies on several lytic enzymes including Novozym 234 OSFovo
Industries Ltd, Bagsvaerd, Denmark); lywallzyme (prepared from
Trichoderma longibrachiatum Rifai by Guangdong Listitute of
Microbiology, China) and Cellulase CP (John & E. Sturge Ltd, Selby,
North Yorkshire, England) by Yu and Chang in 1987 showed that
24
Page 38
fotroduction
Novozym 234 provided the best chitinase, P-glucanase and a-glucanase
activities.
Novozym 234 produced satisfactory protoplast yield in many ftmgi
including edible mushrooms such as V. volvacea, Pleurotus and Lentinus
(Lau et aL, 1985). However, its action is not universal against all fungi
and why the walls of some fungi are resistant to Novozym 234 are
unknown (Hocart & Peberdy,1990).
Table 3 Protoplast isolation system in some edible mushrooms (sources:
klitrennikoff&Bloomfield,1984; Kitamoto etal; 1988; Peberdy, 1991)
organism stablizer lytic enzyme used Agaricus 0.5M MgSO4 induced lytic enzyme bisporus 0.6M MgSO4 lywallzyme
0.6M sucrose induced lytic enzyme 0.5M MgSO4, chitinase, Novozym 234 lmM CaCl2
Lentinula 0.5M MgSO4 induced lytic enzyme edodes 0.6M MgSO4 p-glucuronidase, celluase
1.2M MgSO4 induced lytic enzyme 0.5M mannitol celluase, chitinase,
Zymolase 60,000 0.6M mannitol celluase, chitinase
Pleurotus 0.4M MgSO4 lywallzyme sajor-caju 0.6M MgSO4 celluase, Novozyme 234
0.7M mannitol p-glucuronidase, celluase
Volvariella volvacea 0.5M MgSO4 induced lytic enzyme
0.6M MgSO4 Novozym 234 1.2M MgSO4 induced lytic enzyme,
Novozym 234 1.2M KC1 induced lytic enzyme,
Novozym 234 0.6M NaCl Novozym 234 0.6/0.8M mannitol lywallzyme
Novozym 234
25
Page 39
fotroduction
Activity of a lytic enzyme is also subject to batch variation with respect to
yields ofprotoplasts resulted (Peberdy, 1995). bi digestion complex, their
activities will also be affected by other factors such as osmotic stabilizer
(Yu & Chang,1987). Therefore, optimized conditions for protoplast yield
are different from strain to strain (Peberdy, 1991).
1.4.2.3 Osmotic stabilizers
Osmotic stabilizer is required to keep the fragile protoplasts from bursting
after they are released from the cell walls. Results from many studies
showed that, generally, inorganic salts (except heavily-charged cation and
anion), sugars and sugar alcohols are good for filamentous fungi (Davis,
1985; Yu & Chang, 1987; Peberdy, 1991). MgSO4, mannitol and sucrose
have been the most commonly used in Basidiomycetes (Yu & Chang,
1987; Peberdy, 1991).
The types of osmotic stabilizer vary in each laboratory and the
determination of the most effective osmoticum for a given fungus is
empirical (Peberdy, 1991). Jn fact, the mechanism involved in the
digestion has not been understood yet.
The osmotic stabilizer and the lytic enzyme interact each other in the
digestion mixture (Peberdy, 1991). Yu and Chang (1987) observed that
chitinase was the most sensitive to inhibition by the various compounds
tested. For inorganic salts, the inhibition increased in the order: NO3-,C1'
< SO4 " < PO43-, and Na+,K+ < Mg〗+,Ca�+. However, MgSO4 has been
shown to be equally efficient as KC1 and NH4Cl for protoplast liberation
(Davis, 1985). For organic compounds, Yu and Chang (1987) showed
sucrose at a concentration of 600 mmol/1 had no effect on chitinase or P-
glucanase activity, but there was a 50% inhibition ofa-glucanase activity.
26
Page 40
fotroduction
Mannitol and sorbitol enhanced chitinase activity about 2-fold, had no
effect on p-glucanase but produced a 20-30% inhibition ofa-glucanase.
1.4.2.4 Physiological condition ofmycelium
The importance of the physiological condition of mycdium used for
protoplast isolation has been reported for many fungi (Peberdy, 1989).
Most reports indicated poorer protoplast yield in Basidiomycetes when
compared to other species. Mycelia of most Basidiomycetes grow very
slowly and the different phases of growth are less distinct. However,
whether it is an important factor in poor protoplast production is unknown
(Peberdy, 1995).
Jn P. sajor-caju, Lau et al. (1985) found that protoplast release was
markedly affected by the age of the mycelium. One day old mycelium
gave a yield of 3.2 X 1 0 W , while four day old mycelium gave only 7.0
X 10Vml.
1.4.2.5 Protoplast regeneration
The process of new wall formation on the protoplast surface and
regeneration to the normal cell form are the crucial events in the
application of protoplasts in genetic manipulation (Peberdy, 1991).
Regeneration frequency is normally assessed on the basis of counts ofthe
colony forming units. Jn many fimgi, especially Basidiomycetes, such
frequency is low, less than 10% (Chang et al., 1985; Lau et al., 1985;
Peberdy, 1989; Zhao & Chang,1993).
As with protoplast isolation, the optimization of conditions for
regeneration is also empirical with external factors such as osmotic
stabilizer and lytic enzymes used (Peberdy, 1991). Lau et al. (1985)
found in their study that mannitol, when compared with KC1 and MgSO4,
27
Page 41
fotroduction
is the most effective osmoticum in the regeneration of protoplasts of P.
sajor-caju. Zhao and Chang also showed in their study in 1993 the
suitability of mannitol for protoplast regeneration in the several edible
mushrooms they tested.
1.4.2.6 Application ofprotoplasts
Protoplasts have played an important role in genetic study and
manipulation in fungi. A new experimental approach to karyotype
analysis, called pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), involving
subjecting intact chromosomes to a pulse field in an agarose gel matrix
has been used widely in ftmgal genetic research since its first
development in 1984 (Walz, 1995). The prerequisite for a successful
karyotyping by PFGE is the isolation of an adequate quantity of
protoplasts as the source ofintact chromosomes.
In genetic manipulation, protoplasts are used in two areas: fusion and
transformation (Peberdy,1991). Through protoplast fusion, it is possible
to bring together whole genomes of related or unrelated strains and
promote recombinations leading to production of novel strains. This
technology has been adopted with several mushrooms such as Coprinus,
Pleurotus and Lentinula (Peberdy, 1991). Transformation is the
introduction of the gene of interest into the cell through a vector DNA
molecule. Up to now, most successful methods to introduce DNA into
fimgal cells have been using protoplasts (Peberdy, 1995). In other areas,
such as strain improvement and detection of pharmacologically important
drugs, protoplasts also provide a useful tool.
28
Page 42
Introduction
1.5 Purpose and significance ofthis genetic study on V. volvacea
In order to find out whether and how genetic variations exist in V.
volvacea, a genetic analysis was carried out. The F1 and F2 progenies
were obtained to examine inheritance pattern. AP-PCR (arbitrarily primed
polymerase chain reaction) is one of the most commonly used PCR
methods in DNA fingerprinting. Since it requires no prior sequence
information, it was used in this study to detect any genetic variation in V.
volvacea about which the DNA sequenc& information is still unavailable.
In addition, morphological and physiological characters such as colony
morphology and growth rate of the progenies were also examined. This
study can detect evidence for the existence of genetic variations in V.
volvacea. Thus, further studies on the variation-generating mechanisms
and other details in the life cycle ofthis mushroom can be carried out.
29
— — ^ ^ — • ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • ^ ^ • — — ^ ^ ^ ^ — ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ — l ^ — I ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ B ^ — — ^ M ^ — B a a B » — i i A K J J 」 J i _ l l l _ ljWWmMPwnrwj_uwui
Page 43
Chapter 2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Organism
Volvariella volvacea strain V34 was used. This strain originates from
Thailand.
2.2 Cell cultivation and maintenance
Cultures were maintained at 32°C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) which
contains 200 gm of potato infusion and 20 gm of bacto-dextrose. To mass
produce mycelium for DNA extraction, agar blocks of 1 cm in diameter
carrying mycelium were aseptically inoculated into potato dextrose (PD)
broth. The cultures were kept at 32°C stationary in darkness for 3-4 days.
2.3 Solutions and chemicals
2.3.1 Solutions for DNA isolation
(a) Lysis Buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2; 50 mM EDTA, pH 7.2; 3%
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); 1% 2-mercaptoethanol.
(b) TE buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl (pR 8.0); 0.1 mM EDTA.
(c) Phenol: Phenol (molecular biology grade, Sigma) was melted at 60°C and
saturated with 1 M Tris-HCl ^pH 8.0).
(d) Phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, pH 8.0±2): from Amesco
or Pharmacia Biotechnology Ltd.
(e) DNAase-free pancreatic RNase solution: Dissolve pancreatic RNase
(RNase A) at concentration of 10 mg/ml in 10 mM Tris-HCl Q>H 7.5)
30
HHH^HHHBI^H^^H^^HIH^HI^^^BIHHII^HHHII^H^^HIHmHIHHHHHBBIHBmB^BUSffiWffiByaffiHBR
Page 44
Materials and Methods
and 15 mM NaCl. Heat at 100°C for 15 minutes. Allow to cool slowly to
room temperature. Store at -20°C.
2.3.2 Solutions for agarose gel electrophoresis
(a) 5 X TBE buffer: 0.089 M Tris base; 0.089 M boric acid; 0.002 M EDTA
(pH 8.0). Store at room temperature.
(b) 6 X gel loading buffer: 0.25% bromophenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol;
30% glycerol in distilled H2O.
(c) 10 mg^nl ethidium bromide: 100 mg ethidium bromide in 10 ml distilled
H2O. Store at 4°C in darkness.
2.3.3 PCR primers and reagents
Primers:
(a) M13 forward sequence (M13sq):
5'- CGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC -3,
(b) M13 reverse sequence (M13rs):
5'- AGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGGA -3'
Reagents:
Replica-Pack Reagent Set (Boehringer Mannheim).
2.4 DNA extraction and purification
Fresh mycelium was freeze-dried and ground in liquid nitrogen using a set
of sterilized and precooled mortar and pestle. Genomic DNA was extracted
and purified following the mini-preparation method (Lee & Taylor,1990).
The ground mycelium was transferred into a 1.5 ml eppendorf tube and 400
31
Page 45
Materials and Methods
^1 lysis buffer was added. Then the content was mixed by a pipette tip to
obtain a homogenous solution, which was then incubated in a 65°C water
bath for 1.5 hours with occasional inversion. Then one volume of phenol:
chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added, and the tube was inverted
gently to mix. The clear top phase was transferred to a new tube after 10 min
of centrifugation at 14,000 x g. Phenol extraction could be repeated 2-3
times to remove the proteins. Then, 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and
1 volume of ice-chilled isopropanol were added and mixed gently. The tube
was left at -20°C for 2 hours and the precipitated DNA was pelleted by
centrifugation at 14,000 x g for 2 min. The pellet was rinsed with 70% ice-
cold ethanol, air dried and resuspended in 100 ^1 TE buffer. RNA was
removed by adding 5 il of 10 mg/ml RNaseA solution and incubating at
37°C for 1 hour. Then 100 mg of cesium chloride (CsCl) was added and the
tube was gently shaken to dissolve the CsCl. After centrifugation at 14,000 x
g for 15 min, the supernatant containing purified DNA was transferred to a
new tube. Three volumes of TE buffer were added, and followed by 1
volume of isopropanol. Then the solution was centrifuged again. DNA pellet
was rinsed with ice-cold 70 % ethanol, air dried and resuspended in 100 il
TE.
2.5 Agarose gel electrophoresis
DNA samples were loaded and resolved on agarose gel (LE grade, FMC). A
100 bp ladder (Pharmacia) or HinAlll digest of phage lambda DNA
(Pharmacia) was loaded in parallel to serve as DNA size marker. After
electrophoresis at 80 v for 120 min (for PCR products), or, at 100 v for 90
32
Page 46
Materials and Methods
min (for genomic DNAs), the gel was stained by 0.5 ^g/ml ethidium bromide
for 20 min, destained in H2O for 2 min and photographed under UV
transillumination using Polaroid fibn (type 667,speed = ISO 3000) or
pictured with video camera and saved as a computer file using the gel
documentation system (BIO-RAD, model no.: GS 670).
2.6 Arbitrarily-primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR)
In 50 ul PCR reaction mixture, there were the following components: lx
PCR buffer (Boehringer Mannheim), 10 ng of genomic DNA, 4 mM MgCl2,
0.2 mM each of dNTPs (Boehringer Mannheim), 1 ^M primer, (Operon
Technologies, Alameda) and 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer
Mannheim). The mixture was overlaid with mineral oil (Sigma). The reaction
was performed in a thermal cycler (minicycler, MJ) programmed as: 2 low
stringency cycles at first (94�C,5 min; 35�C,5 min; 72�C,5 min), then 38
high stringency cycles (94°C,1 min; 55°C, 1 min; 72�C,2 min) and a fmal
10 min chain extension at 72°C. Amplification product was checked by
resolving 5 il ofPCR mixture on 3 % NuSieve agarose (FMC) as mentioned
in section 2.5. The experiment was repeated at least once.
2.7 Protoplast isolation and regeneration
2.7.1 Preparation ofprotoplasts
Volvariella volvacea was grown on PDA plates at 32°C for 1 week. Then
agar blocks (1 cm in diameter) carrying mycelium were transferred into 100
ml PD broth contained in a 250 ml conical flask and cultured for 3 days at
32°C stationary. Mycelium was harvested by filtering through a sterilized
33
Page 47
Materials and Methods
nickel sieve and washed with sterilized 0.8 M mannitol solution. It was
soaked-dry by sterilized absorbent paper. Then the mycelium was suspended
in filter-sterilized lywallzyme solution (10 mg/ml in 0.8 M majmitol)
(Guangdong Listitute of Microbiology, China) and was digested for 1.5
hours at 30°C at 100 rpm. To harvest protoplasts, hyphal fragments were
removed by filtration through about 5 mm thick cotton packed in a 5 ml
syringe. Protoplasts were collected from the filtrate by centrifugation (3,000
rpm at room temperature for 10 minutes). Pellets were resuspended in 0.8 M
mannitol.
The optimum condition for protoplast yield used in this study was
determined by digesting mycelium of various ages (2 - 4 day old) with
lywallzyme for different times (1 hr, 1.5 hr, 2 hr and 2.5 hr). Protoplast
concentration was measured by haemocytometer.
2.7.2 Regeneration of protoplasts
Protoplasts in 0.8 M mannitol were diluted to around 10 protoplasts/ml.
Then 0.1ml diluted suspension was spread onto a MCM plate (2 g/1 yeast
extract; 2 g/1 peptone; 0.5 g/1 MgSO4 • 7压0; 0.46 g/1 KH2PO4; 1 g/1
K2HPO4; 20 g/l glucose; 0.8 M mannitol) and incubated at 32°C.
Regenerated protopasts were picked up with a needle and transferred to fresh
CM medium (0.5 g/1 MgSO4 • 7氏0; 0.46 g/1 KH2PO4; 1.5 g/1 K2HPO4; 2.0
g/1 peptone; 15 g/l glucose; 2.0 g/1 yeast extract; 0.5 mg/1 Thiamin HC1).
The regeneration frequency was calculated according to the average number
of regenerated protoplasts on four MCM plates. Viable hyphal fragments
could form colonies on both types of plates while regenerated protoplasts
could survive only on MCM plates. Jn parallel, protoplast suspension was
34
Page 48
Materials and Methods
also spread onto MCM plates without mamutol as control. For each type of
media, four plates were spread.
R. F. = no. ofregenerated protoplasts X 100%
no. oftotal protoplasts
R. F.: regeneration frequency
Where number of regenerated protoplasts is counted by deduction of the
number of colonies on MCM without mannitol from the number of colonies
on MCM.
2.8 Single spore isolation and germination
Volvariella volvacea mycelium was grown on PDA plates at 32°C for 4 days
and then inoculated into plastic bags (size: 36 cm x 15 cm) 2/3 filled with
compost (88% straw; 10% wheat bran; 2% lime; 60% moisture content).
These bags were incubated at 34°C to let the mycelium run for 12-14 days.
Then they were opened under the conditions of 28-32°C with humidity
controlled at 85-95%. These bags were watered and illuminated every day in
the following two weeks to harvest mature fruiting bodies. Spores were
collected by placing a fruiting body in a petri dish with a sterile dry filter
paper and incubated at 32°C for 4-5 hours. Then a small piece of the filter
paper was cut and dipped into sterile distilled H2O to prepare a spore
suspension. Spore concentration was counted using a haemocytometer and
fmther diluted to arornid 10 spores/ml. An aliquot of 0.1 ml ofthe diluted
spore suspension was spread onto a CM plate and incubated at 32°C for 2
days. Germinated single spores were counted, then picked out with a needle
and transferred to fresh CM plates using aseptic techniques.
35
•! ^ •• ^ ^ • ••••• ^ •• ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ •! • ^ ^ ^ ^ HIH ^ ^ HIHII ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ IHII ^ ^ ^ HHI ^ ^ BHS R RSIMSMSRKSQS SSmi
Page 49
Materials and Methods
The germination frequency was determined by average numbers of
germinated spores on four CM plates:
G. F. = average no. of germinated spores X 100%
no. of spores spread
G. F.: germination frequency
2.9 Growth rate measurement
2.9.1 Colony diameter measurement -
Mycelial plugs of the same diameter (1 cm) of strain V34, a single spore
isolate or a protoplast regenerant was transferred to fresh CM plates. After
inoculation, the plates were incubated at 32�C for 4 days. Then colony
diameter of each individual was measured at three different dimensions.
Three replicates for one individual were made.
2.9.2 Biomass gain measurement
Mycelial plugs of a strain (parental, single spore isolate or protoplast
regenerant) was inoculated into PD broth and incubated for 4 days. Then wet
mycelium was harvested and transferred into 15 ml fresh CM broth. This
mycelium was homogenised in a sterilized blender cup using a Waring
blender. A suitable volume (1 ml in this study) of mycelial suspension was
pipetted into a 150 ml flask containing 20 ml of fresh CM broth to have
similiar inoculum size. All flasks were incubated at 32°C stationary for 4
days. Then, mycelium was collected from each flask by filtering through
nickel sieve and blotted dry with Whatman 3MM paper. The fresh mycelial
36
Page 50
Materials and Methods
weight from each flask was then measured. For one isolate, three cultures
were performed.
37
Page 51
Chapter 3 Results
3.1 Genomic DNA extraction
Genomic DNAs of V. volvacea strain V34, its protoplast regenerants and F1
progenies were extracted. DNA concentration and purity were checked by
0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 5) and spectrophotometty. The
average yield ofDNA extraction in this study was 300 ug per gram offreeze-
dried mycelium. In general, the absorbance ratios of 260 nm: 280 rnn and
260 nm: 230 nm were 1.9 and 1.8,respectively (Fig. 4). These DNAs were
then used for polymerase chain reaction.
3.2 Genetic analyses ofV34 and its progenies
3.2.1 Protoplast regenerants
3.2.1 • 1 Protoplast preparation
The effects of mycelial age and digestion time on protoplast yield were
shown in Figure 6. Three-day old broth cultures gave the highest yield of
protoplasts after digestion for 1.5 hr (Fig. 6): 1.27 土 0.08 x 10 protoplasts /
ml (mean value ofthree repeats).
38
—^^^^»^—^^^^^^^—^^^^—^^^^^^^^^^^^——^——^^—^^^^^^^^^^—^^^^^^——^H^^^^^^^^^—*^^^^^^^^^™WWWMBHaMi!,JaiBBBUWW—
Page 52
i N : ^ 1 \
0 1 • t _ I • I I , • ; • , . , 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290
Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 4 A typical scan spectrum of genomic DNA sample from Volvariella
volvacea strain V34 and its progenies.
39
Page 53
Result3
1 1 3 4 5 6 1 8
B B B | i » i ^ ™ i H ^ I
_ M M w^^mt^mam I ^ H I ^ H H H B I W K t K M ^^^K^^^^^K^^^
Fig. 5 Agarose gel showing the genomic DNAs from Volvariella volvacea
isolates.
Lanes 1 and 8,DNA size standard: \'HinA\\l\
Lanes 2-7, genome DNA samples.
40
Page 54
16 .
14 - 12 12.733
1- ” i T ^ r »^JM I ''''' •
9 . 2 9 2 M : H 9.06 mycehum r ^ ^ ^ ® - _ f , age (day)
動 门 Bj 9_ ^ ^ 9 _ I I mm I o2: 動 丨_3: ^ J ^ ^ I I
i I I I = 0 . 3 9 3 0.4 0.266 [ “ ^ _ M ^ ^ rnm^^ y ^ , ‘ I ‘ > ;
1 1.5 2 2.5 Incubation time (hr)
Fig. 6 Protoplast yield from different ages of mycelia and different times of
exposure to lytic enzymes.
41
Page 55
Result3
3.2.1.2 Protoplast regeneration
After spreading the protoplast solution onto MCM plates with mannitol and
MCM plates without mannitol (as control), colonies appeared on the plates
after 2-3 days. Number of regenerated protoplasts on both kinds of plates
were counted and the regeneration frequency was calculated according to the
equation in section 2.7.2 (Materials and Methods).
The protoplast regeneration frequency in this study was about 10.9% as
shown in Table 4.
Table 4. The regeneration frequency ofprotoplasts
average no. ofregenerated regeneration frequency = no. of protoplasts on a MCM plate regenerated protoplasts / no. of
total protoplasts x 100%
with mannitol without mannitol 10.9 士 2.6 %
43 .0 i2 .7 28.5 士 1.3
3.2.1.3 Morphology of V34 protoplast regenerants
Different colony morphologies and growth rates were observed among V34
protoplast regenerants (Fig. 7). The colony diameters of six randomly
choosen protoplast regenerants were measured (Table 5).
Table 5. Thecolony diameters ofprotoplast regenerants (4 day cultoe) protoplast no.3~~ no.5 no.7 no.9 no. 10 no.l4 V34 regenerants colony diameter(cm) 8.5土0.1 6.6土0.1 7.0士0.1 8.5士0.0 8.5士0.0 5.8士0.1 8.5士0.0
42
Page 56
Results
| ^ ^ H .T # 1 發
^ ^ ^ | ^ ^ ^ ^ B ^ ^ ^ 9
^ ^
Ki ESiKl
Fig. 7 Colony morphologies of V34 protoplast regenerants.
43
^Ji^[j^^g^^jj^^^^[n^mi^jji^^^j^j^jimjjii^[mm^[i^jj[mjj^^jmiu^[mm^^mum^j^^[^^m^^^[[^^^[mjjj^^^^j^^jfl^^^^pi^^^§^^^^^^^^jj^j^^j3^^j^^^
Page 57
Result3
3.2.1.4 Growth rate measurement
Then mycelium of the protoplast regenerants and V34 were collected and
their weight were measured, respectively (Fig. 8). The protoplast regenerants
exhibited different growth rates: faster, slower, or similiar to that ofV34.
Li this study, offsprings were divided into 3 groups based on their linear
growth rates and the abundance of aerial hyphae. Fast-growing group, of
which individuals had full petri dish growth and plenty of aerial hyphae. Li
this group, they were similiar to V34. Medium-growing group, of which
individuals had more than halfbut not covering the whole petri dish and less
aerial hyphae; and the slow-growing group, of which individuals had less
than halfpetri dish ofgrowth. For F1 progeny, isolates no. 8,no. 10 and no.
33 belonged to fast-growing group; isolates no. 3,no. 7,no. 23,no. 26 and
no. 36 belonged to medium-growing group and isolates no. 6 and no. 9
belonged to slow-growing group.
3.2.1.5 AP-PCR analysis of V34 protoplast regenerants
The two arbitrary primers: M13sq and M13rs, used in this study did not
show any polymorphisms among the six tested protoplast regenerants and
V34 (Figs. 9 and 10).
44
Page 58
Result3
7 1 5.813 - 5.815
6 一 T T ^ - ^ 8 461^ 5.。53 5.04 ^ ^
I J I m _ _ i a I 3 謹 _ _ _ • _ ^ \ m m 霸 • 識 • m
^ - I i i 1 i ; I
1- I 1 i 腹 _ i 圓
J圏w變丨1 1,1 11 1 3 5 7 9 10 14 V34
No. of protoplast regenerants
Fig. 8 The biomass gain by six V34 protoplast regenerants after 4-day
incubation.
45
Page 59
Result3
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 8
•
Fig. 9 AP-PCR profiles of six protoplast regenerants of V. volvacea V34
using primer M13sq.
Lane 1,DNA size standard: A,-/f/>zdIII;
lane 2-7, protoplast regenerants no.3, no.5, no.7, no.9, no.lO and no.l4;
lane 8, V34.
46
Page 60
Result3
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 3 M ^ ^^^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | H ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ H ^ " ' '
^ ^ ^ K ^M^HP [1 ^U^ iff H g ^ ^ ^ g n U ^ ^ ^ K i m ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ K
Fig. 10 AP-PCR profiles of six protoplast regenerants of V. volvacea V34
using primer M13rs.
Lane 1,DNA size standard: X-Hin&ll',
lane 2-7, protoplast regenerants no.3, no.5, no.7, no.9, no.lO and no.l4;
lane 8, V34.
47
Page 61
Result3
3.2.2 V34 single spore isolates (SSIs) - F1 progenies
3.2.2.1 Single spore isolation and germination
V34 was cultured and fruiting was carried out. Spores from mature fruiting
bodies were collected and germinated. Germination frequency was 31.1% in
this study (Table 6).
Table 6. Germination frequency ofV34 spores
no. of spores spread on each CM plate (a) 185
average no. of spores germinated (b) 57.5士 7.7
percentage of germinated spores=b/a xlOO 31.1 ±4.2
3.2.2.2 Morphology o f F l progenies
Different colony morphologies and growth rates were also observed among
germinated spores (F1 progeny) (Fig. 11). Colony diameters of ten randomly
choosen single spore isolates were measured (Table 7).
Table 7. The colony diameters ofsingle spore isolates (SSIs) (4 day cultures)
~~SSIs no.3 no.6 no.7| no.8 no.9|no.lO|no.23 no.26 no.33 no.36 V34
colony diameter^-^-^-^ 4.0±0.1 8.5±0.18.5+0.03.0±0.18.5+0.05.5±0.1 7.5±0.18.5±0.07.5±0.18.5±0.0
(cm)
3.2.2.3 Growth rate measurement
The weights of F1 progenies were measured. (Fig. 12). Highly variable
growth rates among F1 progenies and V34 parent were observed.
48
Page 62
Result3
^ ^ ^ Tf^- : • 7 iP | ^ ^ ^ ^ A ^ ^ i l ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ i i ^ f
^ n j^^^^^^^|
Fig. 11 Colony morphologies of V34 single spore isolates (F1).
49
Page 63
7 n — I 6.358
5.996 ^ 6 - 1 ^ H
4.984 ^ H
5 ‘ 藝 • B 4.424 4.382
_ i J l s Q ^ S MH ^ a I B 'fea i^i ^ ^ _[1» ^ ^ Hi~-
3 6 7 8 9 10 23 26 33 36 V34 No. ofSSIs
Fig. 12 The biomass gain by ten V34 single spore isolates (F1) after 4-day
incubation.
50
Page 64
Result3
3.2.2.4 AP-PCR analysis of 10 V34 single spore isolates
The two primers: M13 sq and M13rs, were used to detect i fDNA polymorphism
existed in F1 progenies. The tested isolates gave highly similiar DNA profiles
with parental strain V34 using arbitrary primers, M13 sq and M13rs (Figs. 13 and
14). Rare susceptible polymorphic DNA bands were observed but were not
reproducible when the experiment was repeated.
3.2.2.5 Fruiting ability o f F l progenies
Ten SSIs (Single Spore Isolates) of V34 were grown in compost bags to examine
their fruiting ability (Table 8). All individuals with slow or medium growth rate
could not even grow in compost. Among three fast growing individuals: no.8,
no.lO and no.33 single spore isolates, two ofthem, no. 10 and no. 33,could fruit
normally as V34 parent. No.8 could grow to primordial stage,but all primordia
died shortly after their appearance.
Table 8. Fruiting test o f F l progeny
n。T no.3 no.6 no.7 no.8 no.9 no.lO no.23 no.26 no.33 no.36 V34 SSls
vegetative 1 . 一 _ _ + - + - - + - + growthm
composf
fruitingin b - - - P * - F - - F 一 F
compost a: “-,,; no myceliimi growth; "+": with mycelium growth.
b: “—,,; no primordia or growth; "P*": primordia aborted; "F": mature fruiting
bodies.
51
Page 65
Result3
^ ^ ^ ^ j ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ o n ^ 2
9Hi99 mStSm ^^^^^^^^^HT VK^^^K2^^^^B •
Fig. 13 AP-PCR profiles of 10 single spore isolates of V34 using primer
M13sq.
Lane 1,1 kb DNA size standard;
lane 2-11, SSIs no.3, no.6, no.7, no.8, no.9, no.lO, no.23, no.26, no.33 and
no.36;
lane 12,V34.
52
Page 66
Results
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 m ^ H H ^ H ^ ^ H ^ ^ ^ H | ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ _
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^| H ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^H
| ^ ^ ^ ^ |H^ [ lf| ^HI ^H{ g ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ |
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ MHHflfl ^ ^ H ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | ^ H BIB^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I I H | K 2 | ^ ^ M ^ H ^ ^ ^ H ^ ^ ^ | ^^^^^^^^H^^^^jjl^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^g ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Fig. 14 AP-PCR profiles of 10 single spore isolates of V34 using primer M13rs. I
(i«
Lane 1, 1 kb DNA size standard;
lane 2—11,SSIs no.3, no.6, no.7,no.8, no.9, no.lO, no.23, no.26, no.33 and
no.36; lane 12, V34.
53
^^M^—i i^^^—^M^M^M^^——^^—MMI—iMMWMllmi l l l l l _ I IBI I I_ i l l l l '
Page 67
Results
3.2.3 Single spore isolates from F1 progenies-F2 progenies
3.2.3.1 Colony morphology and growth rate
Spores were collected from two F1 progenies which did fruit: no.lO and
no.33. After germination, morphological variations in the F2 progenies still
existed (Figs. 15 and 16). The colony diameters of the F2 progenies were
measured (Tables 9 and 10). Their gowth rates were also measured (Figs. 17
and 18).
Table 9. The colony diameters of single spore isolates ofNo.lO F1 progeny
(4 day cultures)
SSIs no.l no.2 no.3 no.4 no.5 no.6 no.7 no.8 no.9 no.l4 No.lO
colony diametei8.5±0.0 8.5+0.0 8.510.0 8.5±0.1 8.5±0.1 8.5±0.14.0±0.1 3.9±0.1 3.7±0.1 1.6±0.1 8.5±0.0
(cm)
Table 10. The colony diameters of single spore isolates ofNo.33 F1 progeny
(4 day cultures)
SSIs no.l no.2 no.4 no.5 no.6no.7 no.9 tio.lO no.ll no.l2 No..33
colony diameter8.5±0.0 8.5±0.0 8.510.1 8.510.0 8.5±0.0 8.5±0.1 5.2±0.5 7.5±0.1 5.210.4 6.110.1 8.5±0.0
(cm)
54
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^m^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^M^^^^^^^^^^^ M^^^M^^I^^^M^^M^^ BBBS *jMi^^^^^^
Page 68
Results
| ^ l J
mm^m^^ ^^^¾ 1 ^ ¾ H K H ^
Fig. 15 Colony morphologies of single spore isolates of No.33 (the F2
progeny).
55
i i i ^ i ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ i ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ i ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ i ^ ^ i ^ ^ ^ wis K si Bj s ^ ^ ^
Page 69
Result3
^^m ^ H j ^ 3 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ E ^ ^ |
^ K K l ^^^^^BH ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^m^^^M
^m p i | ^ B ^ K H
mm I
Fig. 16 Colony morphologies of single spore isolates of No.lO (the F2
progeny).
56
Page 70
7 ^ G.24 , 6.07
6 i j l j _ m _
f ‘ ‘ 4.31 I I ^ A [ ^ W _ ' p 外 - 3 . 5 3 朽 ^ i 3.47 3.5 3.47 麗
t;||ii|| || E I 1 二 雾 • i f 1.4 1 . 3 9 1 . 4 3 I I
:illyjjjjjiLi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 14 S10
No. of single spore isolates ofS10
Fig. 17 The biomass gain by ten single spore isolates o fNo . 10 after 4-day
incubation.
57
Page 71
s
n^^^ia^
5
r
2
^ n
遣
3
”-iw5#Fwd 1
H
Fr^_1 1
^ ””
J
1 K
s
o ^
.^
S
ii^ 9
_ 譯
d s
.u ^
1
^i^liii
%i 8
I I
^
•
S
-isiii 6
I
I .
細
S
g^^^i 5
a
- m
^ t^^s,广(.f^.^.v^t4c^
|v
>«.
aJ
<
4
.2
3 *
n
- #
: .
e
^ .
T n
2
n“““—TT““n”nJ
?
o
力
t^
££^s
ps
f^ 2 5
.u
6
¾¾¾^! €
3
-¾ -a-.J
8
对
1
^ ,_^^^iii^^^ 1
•阮•咖
8 6
4
2
o
(3)
ul^pM
lumlsxol
Page 72
Chapter 4 Discussion
4.1 Protoplast isolation and regeneration
The isolation of protoplasts is a total result of the interactions of many
factors. The three major factors are: lytic enzyme, osmotic stabilizer and
the physiological state of the mycelium. Although Novozym 234 was
reported in many studies to give the highest chitinase, p-glucanase and a-
glucanase activities and also very satisfactory protoplast yield in many
fungi, including Volvariella volvacea (Chang et aL, 1985; Yu & Ghang,
1987; Peberdy, 1995), it is too expensive to be widely used.
The lywallzyme used in this study is derived from Trichoderma
longibrachiatum and was very effective in the lysis of several edible
mushrooms such as Agaricus, Lentinula and Pleurotus (Chang et aL,
1985; Zhao & Chang 1993). Result of protoplast yield from this study
(1.27 土 0.08 X 10 protoplast/ml) also proved its effectiveness for
Volvariella volvacea.
As an osmotic stabilizer, mannitol was choosen because it has been one
of the most commonly used in Basidiomycetes and it was also shown to
enhance chitinase activity in digestion mixture (Yu & Chang,1987). In
the prelinmiary experiments, both spores and vegetative mycelium were
used to release protoplasts but spores were more resistant to lytic
enzymes than vegetative mycelium and gave much lower yield. Another
tissue tried was young gills of fruiting bodies at the button stage. They
gave rather high yield comparable with that ofvegetative mycelium. They
were not used because fruiting bodies are not easily available as with
vegetative mycelium.
59
Page 73
Discussion
Regeneration of protoplasts is a very important step to apply protoplasts
in genetic manipulations. However, in many fungi, especially
Basidiomycetes, regeneration frequencies are low (Peberdy, 1989). Jn P.
sajor-caju and V. volvacea, Chang and co-workers (1985) observed that
the regeneration frequencies of both fungal protoplasts were lower than
1%. Lau et al. (1985) showed a 4-6% regeneration frequency in P. sajor-
caju. Zhao and Chang (1993) showed in their study that, among the
several mushrooms examined, the highest regeneration frequency of
9.6% was found with P. florida and the lowest of 0.96% with L edodes.
Li this study, the regeneration frequency was 10.9% in Volvariella
volvacea. The reason for low regeneration frequency is still not known
(Peberdy, 1995). Santiago (1982) observed that the cytoplasm in a
mycelial cell during protoplast release was repeatedly constricted to
divide into two or more spherical bodies. Some of them had no nuclei.
Moreover, it is also possible that protoplasts which possess nuclei might
have lost some other important organelles, such as mitochondria, resulting
in insufficient energy production and biosynthesis of proteins/reserve
materials which are needed in cell growth. Even if there is no loss of
nuclei or mitochondria, the protoplasts isolated from fungal mycelium are
very heterogeneous because of the spatial differentiation of biochemical
activities in the growing hyphae. The poor regeneration of protoplasts
from many fungi may be a reflection of the heterogeneity (Peberdy,
1995). The attempt to isolate protoplasts from spores was to produce a
more homogeneous preparation with a presumed higher regeneration
frequency. However, regeneration frequency of spore protoplasts was still
significantly lower than 90% (Bos, 1985). This could be because some
spores may not be fully developed or matured.
60
Page 74
Discussion
External factors also affect regeneration of protoplasts, such as presence
oflytic enzymes. These enzymes are used to iyse cell walls and therefore
liberate protoplasts. If they are not completely removed from protoplast
preparation, the residue enzyme, even only a very small amount, is able to
inhibit cell wall formation.
4.2 Phenotypic variations in Volvariella volvacea
4.2.1 Colony morphology
It was found that there were wide variations in colony morphology among
V34 protoplast regenerants, F1 single spore isolates and F2 single spore
isolates (Figs 7,11,15, 16). Offspring individuals can be easily divided
into "parental" and "non-parental" groups in which "parental" group have
plenty of mycelium and aerial hyphae, while "non-parental" group does
not. However, it is difficult to subdivide them because of the great
variations among individuals such as presence or absence of concentric
rings, abundance of aerialhyphae (Figs. 7, 11,15, 16).
4.2.2 Growth rate
Two methods were used in this study to measure growth rate of the
individuals: colony diameter measurement and biomass gain
measurement. Colony diameter measurement, also called linear growth
rate measurement, is a very simple method to measure fungal growth. It
involves only the transfer of mycelial plugs with the same diameters and
colony morphology can be observed directly from the agar plates.
Biomass gain measurement, however, requires more manipulations and
time and thus is slower and more complicated. Colony morphology
information cannot be provided by the latter method. But colony diameter
can roughly present the growth rate since mycelia usually grow radially in
61
Page 75
Discussion
all directions. Those growing inside the agar cannot be measured.
Moreover, there is no correlation between the spread area of a mycelial
front on a solid surface and the total amount the fungus produced. On the
contrary, biomass gain measurement provides accurate data on growth
rate and thus is a better criterion in growth rate test. For instance, among
F1 single spore isolates, No.3, No.7, No.8, No.lO and No.33 had the
same colony diameters (8.5±0.0 cm or 8.510.1 cm) but their biomass
gains were very different, ranging from 2.09±0.12 g to 6.36±0.15 g
(Table 7,Fig. 12).
4.2.3 Fruiting ability
Since 1969, Chang and colleagues have repeatedly shown that a single
basidiospore of V. volvacea can germinate and form fruiting bodies by
itself without any mating (Chang & Yau,1971; Li,1977; Chang et al.,
1981; Li, 1991). Thus V. volvacea is taken as homothallic. Great
variations among its single spore isolates were also observed in these
studies. Li and Chang (1979), Chang and coworkers (1981) demonstrated
that there was no correlation between the mycelial colony morphology,
linear growth rate and self-fertility. Both "normal" isolates which grew
vigorously to form a greyish-white colony with abundant aerial hyphae,
and the "abnormal" isolates which differed from "normal", could be
either fertile or sterile.
Jn this study, 10 F1 single spore isolates were examined for their fruiting
ability. The data agreed mostly with those previous description (Table 8).
Both self-fertile and self-sterile individuals occurred among single spore
isolates. All those individuals which could fhiit normally as their parent
V34 were fast-growing ones. All medium or slow-growing isolates
62
Page 76
Discussion
showed very poor or no vegetative growth in compost. However, not
every fast-growing isolates can fruit normally. No.8 isolate, which was
very fluffy and fast-growing, could only reach primordia stage and No.36
was sterile.
4.3 Genetic mechanisms for phenotypic variations in V, volvacea
Li fungi, two mechanisms have been recognized to generate genetic
variations: meiotic recombination and mitotic recombination (Raper,
1966; Fincham et al., 1979; Bos and Swart, 1995). ln the anaphase offirst
meiotic division (MI),homologous chromosomes segregate to the
different poles of the spindle. In this way, a reassortment of non-
homologous chromosomes is achieved. Before the chromosome
seperation, exchange between sister or non-sister chromatids happens. If
the homologous chromosomes carry different alleles at one or more loci,
crossingovers between non-sister chromatids will result in recombination
ofgenes (Fig. 1).
Homologous chromosomes behave independently during mitosis. Sister
chromatids separate during the anaphase resulting in two daughter cells
with the same genetic information. However, genetic evidence in
Aspergillus ^Sfga and Roper, 1968) demonstrated that homologous
chromosomes can exchange parts of nonsister chromatids and unequal
crossingover can occur during mitosis, resulting in duplication. Mitotic
crossingovers also result in recombination ofthe genes (Fig. 2).
Studies on nuclear behaviour and ploidy level at different developmental
stages, sensitivity to radiation and segregation of isozyme markers proved
the haploid life cycle of V. volvacea (Quaye, 1986; Royse et al., 1987;
Chiu, 1993). Chiu (1993) concluded that a haploid uninucleate
basidiospore germinates to haploid multinucleate mycelium and forms
63
Page 77
Discussion
fruiting bodies. Then, a uninucleate hymenial initial divides mitotically
to a binucleate condition, and karyogamy leads to a transient diploid
stage. DNA replicates to 4N in content. Basidiospores are formed through
meiosis and life cycle of V. volvacea is completed (Fig. 3).
The transient diploid stage provides possibility for V. volvacea to generate
meiotic recombinations leading to the formation of haploid, uninucleate
basidiospores carrying genetic variations, bi principle, mitotic
crossingover cannot occur when the nuclei of the fungus are haploid
(Raper, 1966; Bos and Swart, 1995). JnAspergillus, it was observed that
occasionally, two nuclei in a hypha cell can fuse and give rise to diploid
condition (Bos and Swart, 1995). bi V. volvacea, since the vegetative
mycelium is multinucleate, crowding of nuclei was commonly
encountered (Li, 1977). Whether mitotic recombination exists in V.
volvacea or not is uncertain.
Mitotic recombination has been found (Smith, 1974; Bos and Swart,
1995). However, the frequency of mitotic crossingover is much lower
than that ofmeiotic crossingover (Bos and Swart, 1995). During meiosis,
many crossingover events occurred in each meiocyte, whereas mitotic
crossingover in artificially induced unstable diploids could occur at a
frequency as high as 10' in Neurospora crassa (Smith, 1974).
Since basidiospores are meiotic products, they should bear higher
frequency of genetic variation than protoplasts, which come from mitotic
vegetative mycelium. Therefore, higher frequency of phenotypic
variations should be observed in basidiospores. If we assume that
phenotypic variations observed in this study were arisen from meiotic or
64
Page 78
Discussion
mitotic recombinations, then these results agreed with the observations in
which F1 single spore isolates did exhibit much more variations in their
colony morphologies and growth rates (Fig. 11) than protoplast
regenerants (Fig. 7).
4.4 AP-PCR analyses
AP-PCR generates unique DNA profiles for every individual as
demonstrated in many organisms such as bacteria, plant and man (Welsh
& McClelland,1990; Fekete et al., 1992; Rafalski & Tingey, 1993). In
mushroom L edodes, AP-PCR has been used for typing strains (Chiu et
al., 1992; Chiu, 1993; Kwan et al., 1992). AP-PCR has been widely used
in detecting genetic variations. The polymorphic bands generated from
AP-PCR behave as dominant genetic markers (Rafalski & Tingey,1993).
In V. volvacea, AP-PCR was first used by Chen (1994) to type three
strains: V14, V22 and V34. Four arbitrary primers (Del, Eco, M13sq and
Gal) were used and three of them (Del, Eco and M13sq) gave different
banding patterns among the three strains. Jn this study, two arbitrary
primers: M13sq and M13rs, were used to analyse V34 protoplast
regenerants. Six randomly choosen protoplast regenerants and V34 itself
were analysed. However, no polymorphism was detected by any of the
primers (Figs. 9,10).
Ten randomly choosen F1 single spore isolates were also tested. Results
were surprising, too: all 10 F1 progenies as well as their parent V34, no
matter how different their phenotypes were, their DNA banding patterns
were similiar using primer M13rs and M13sq, respectively (Figs. 13,14).
65
Page 79
Discussion
Different phenotypes may reflect variations in genetic makeup. Genetic
information generally transfers from DNA to RNA and finally to
poteins/peptides. DNA variations which can be expressed is able to be
printed on RNA, resulting in polymorphisms in RNA fingerprint. These
polymorphisms, however, do not mean the differences in DNA because of
the gene expression regulation in DNA. Thus, RNA fingerprinting cannot
be used to detect DNA variations. To hunt for the mechanisms generating
DNA variation, it is crucial to understand the possible mechanisms.
4.5 Possible sources for variations
Expression of morphological characters depends not only on the genetic
information but also on environmental factors. However, the role of
environmental factors is not taken into account in this study as well as
previous studies on morphological variations among single spore isolates
since all cultures were grown in uniform conditions as far as possible. Li
and Chang (1979) suggested the differences among the progenies may
due to either spontaneous mutations, or expression of pre-existed
morphological mutants by recombination, or even chromosomal
aberrations.
Mitotic recombinations have been demonstrated in Neurospora (Smith,
1974),although there is not enough evidence for V. volvacea yet. Also, in
ftmgal nuclear divisions, asynchronous movement of chromosomes is
very common (Heath, 1978). Mitotic nondisjunction of sister chromatids
may lead to aneuploidy. Such genetic variation cannot be detected since
there are normal nuclei in the same thallus (Chiu & Chang,1987). Other
sources of variation may come from other genetic materials besides the
nucleus, such as mitochondrial genome or transponsons.
66
Page 80
Discussion
Transposons, if present, can move around in the genome. Thus there is
induced variation in the phenotype. Detection of the transposons is
difficult as they are not stably inherited and the random movement in the
genome.
4.5.1 Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
Because of the genes encoding subunits of the respiratory chain complex
and ATPase in mtDNA, defects in mitochondrial genome usually be
expressed in the progenies as affecting their growth rates. Li Neurospora
and yeast, mitochondrial DNA mutations occur at rather high frequency
in wild type strains, such as certain types of yeast petites (deletion
mutation in mtDNA) arose at 10" (Griffiths et al., 1995; Marotta et al.,
1982). Such spontaneous mutations in mtDNA, and also the interactions
with nuclear genome, are possible to account for the phenotypic
variations in growth rate of V. volvacea because of the widely observed
different growth rate.
Li comparison with nuclear genome, fungal mitochondrial DNA is very
small (Smith et aL, 1987; Orbach et al., 1988, Hudspeth, 1992).
Therefore, the amplified AP-PCR profile mostly reflects the genetic
makeup ofnuclear genome.
4.5.2 Spontaneous mutations
Spontaneous mutations are very rare events, hi Neurospora, such
mutation rate is about 10' (Ayala & Kiger,1984). Unlike Neurospora
and many other fungi, which have single or a few nuclei in each cell,
vegetative mycelium of V. volvacea is multinucleate. Chang and Ling in
1970 observed that, the number of nuclei in each mycelial cell was very
high, ranging from 3-105,with a mean value of 22.10 土 1.54. Ifmutations
67
Page 81
Discussion
oceur in only one nucleus, it may not be able to be detected or expressed
in phenotype. But with so many nuclei and in each of them DNA
duplication and nuclear division are undergoing, there is not only more
chances to accumulate mutation effect leading to the change of
phenotype, but also the increasement of accumulated mutation events.
Thus, for V. volvacea, spontaneous mutation has a higher possibility to
cause phenotypic variations in progenies than for many other fungi.
However, spontaneous mutation cannot be detected unless the whole
genome is to be screened.
As a summary of these possible sources, mtDNA genome should be
examined in the future.
68
I ^ ^BBB^ ^ MBBI ^ ^ ^ BI ^M^ ^ ^B^M^B^M^—^—^———Ml MMMwmnmw«ranwr_i___iii_i_则丨丨
Page 82
Conclusion
The present study confirmed that variations in Volvariella volvacea do
exist. In F1 single spore isolates, colony morphology, growth rate and
fertility are highly variable; even from F1 to F2 progeny, these variations
still persist; in protoplast regenerants, phenotypic variations showed less
variablility. No distinct relationship between colony morphology, growth
rate and fertility have been found. However, with these great phenotypic
variations among V34, its protoplast regenerants and single spore isolates,
AP-PCR analysis using two arbitrary primers did not detect DNA
polymorphisms. These results provide evidence for the primary
homothallic life cycle of V. volvacea. The mechanisms in V. volvacea
generating such wide variations may not from nuclear genome only.
Among these possible sources, mitochondrial genome, which controls the
ATP synthesis, growth rate and life span, might have contributed to the
observed variations in V. volvacea.
69
Page 83
References
Anderson, J. B. 1991. Molecular tools in breeding Agaricus. Li:
Genetics and Breeding of Edible Mushrooms (eds. Chang, S. T.,
Buswell, J. A. and Miles, P. G.), pp. 207-223. Gordon and Breach
Sci. Pub.: Philadelphia.
Arganoza, M. T.,Min, J.,Hu, Z. Y. and Akins, R. A. 1994.
Distribution of seven homology groups of mitochondrial
plasmids in Neurospora: evidence for widespread mobility
between species in nature. Current Genetics 26: 62-73.
Amheim, N., Li, H. H. and Cui, X. F. 1990. PCR analysis of DNA
sequences in single cells-single sperm gene mapping and genetic
disease diagnosis. Genomics 8: 415-419.
Ayala, F. J. and Kiger, J. A. 1984. Modern Genetics, pp. 243-244 & pp.
672-676. The Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Company Jnc.: London.
Bachmann, B. J. and Bonner, D. M. 1959. Protoplasts from
Neurospora crassa. Journal of Bacteriology 78: 550-556.
Bej, A. K. 1991. Amplification of nucleic acid by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) and other methods and their applications. Critical
Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 26: 301-334.
70
Page 84
References
d
Bprtrand, H., Chan, B. S. S. and Griffiths, A. J. F. 1985. Insertion o f a
foreign nucleotide sequence into mitochondrial DNA causes
senescence in Neurospora intermedia. Cell 41: 877-884.
Bos, C. J. 1985. Protoplasts from fimgal spores. Hi; Fungal protoplasts
(eds. Peberdy, J. F. and Ferenczy, L.), pp. 189-203. Marcel
Dekker: New York.
Bos, C. J. and Swart, K. 1995. Genetics of Aspergillus, bi: The
Mycota: Genetics and Biotechnology (eds. Esser, K. and Lemke,
P. A.), pp. 19-33. Spring-Verlag: Berlin, Heideberg.
Bostein, D., White, R., SkoMck, M. and Davis, R. W. 1980.
Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction
fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human
Genetics 32: 314-331.
Bowden, C. G., Royse, D. J. and May, B. 1991. Linkage relationships
of allozyme encoding loci in Lentinula edodes. Genome 34: 652-
657.
Bumett, J. H. 1975. Mycogenetics. John Wiley and Sons: London.
Buswell, J. A.,Cai, Y. J. and Chang, S. T. 1993. Fungal- and
substrate-associated factors affecting the ability of individual
mushroom species to utilize different lignocellulosic growth
substrates. Li: Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products (eds.
71
Page 85
References f
Chang, S. T.,Buswell, J. A. and Chiu, S. W.), pp. 141-150. The
Chinese University Press: Hong Kong.
Cai, Y. J., Buswell, J. A. and Chang, S. T. 1994. Production of
cellulase and hemicellulase by the straw mushroom, Volvariella
volvacea. Mycological Research 98: 1019-1024.
Castle, A. J., Horgen, P. A. and Anderson, J. B. 1987. Restriction
fragment length polymorphisms in the mushrooms Agaricus
brunnescem and Agaricus bitorquis. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 53: 816-822.
Chang, S. T. 1969. A cytological study of spore germination of
Volvariella volvacea. The Botanical magazine 82: 102-109.
Chang S. T. 1977. The origin and early development of straw
mushroom cultivation. Economic Botany 31: 374-376.
Chang, S. T. 1978. Volvariella volvacea. In: The Biology and
Cultivation of Edible mushrooms (eds. Chang, S. T. and Hayes,
W. A.), pp. 573-605. Academic Press: New York.
Chang, S. T. 1980. Mushrooms as human food. Bioscience 30: 399-
401.
Chang, S. T. 1991. Cultivated mushrooms. In: Handbook of Applied
Mycology, volume 3: Foods and Feeds (eds. Arora, D. K.,
72
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ HHHHH HH HmHBBHHHHHB BE HmESBBnsBn KKnHi Bm
Page 86
References
Mukerji, K. G. and Marth, E. H.), pp. 221-240. Marcel Dekker:
New York.
Chang, S. T. 1993a. Mushroom and mushroom biology, hi: Genetics
and Breeding of Edible Mushrooms (eds. Chang, S. T., Buswell,
J. A. and Miles, P. G.), pp.M3. Gordon & Breach Pub. Inc:
Philadelphia.
Chang, S. T. 1993b. Mushroom biology: the impact on mushroom
production and mushroom products. In: Mushroom Biology and
Mushroom Product (eds. Chang, S. T.,Buswell, J. A. and Chiu,
S. W.), pp. 3-17. The Chinese University Press: Hong Kong.
Chang, S. T. 1993c. Biology and cultivation technology of Volvariella
volvacea. In: Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Product (eds.
Chang, S. T., Buswell, J. A. and Chiu, S. W.), pp. 73-83. The
Chinese University Press: Hong Kong.
Chang, S. T. and Chu, S. S. 1969. Nuclear behaviour in the basidium
of Volvariella volvacea. Cytologia 34: 293-299.
Chang, S. T. and Ling, K. Y. 1970. Nuclear behaviour in the
basidiomycete,Volvariella volvacea. American Journal of Botany
57: 165-171.
Chang, S. T. and Yau, C. K. 1971. Volvariella volvacea and its life
history. American Journal ofBotany 58: 552-562.
73
Page 87
References
Chang, S. T., Miles, P. G. and Wai, C. C. 1981. A study of
monosporous isolates of Volvariella volvacea. Mushroom Science
11,603-619.
Chang, S. T.,Li, G. S. F. and Peberdy, J. F. 1985. Isolation of
protoplasts from edible fungi. MIRCENJournal 1: 185-194.
Chen, M. J. 1994. Molecular Studies on the Chinese Straw Mushroom,
Volvariella volvacea. M. Phil thesis. The Chinese University of
Hong Kong: Hong Kong.
Chiu, S. W. 1993. Evidence for a haploid life-cycle in Volvariella
volvacea fi:om microspectrophotometric measurements and
observations of nuclear behavior. Mycological Research 97:
1481-1485.
Chiu, S. W. and Chang, S. T. 1987. Volvariella bombycina and its life
history. Mushroom Journalfor the Tropics 7: 1-12.
Chiu, S. W.,Kwan, H. S. and Cheng, S. C. 1992. Application of
arbitrarily-primed polymerase chain reaction in molecular studies
of mushroom species with emphasis on Lentinula edodes. In:
Genetics and Breeding of Edible Mushrooms (eds. Chang, S. T.,
Miles, P. G. and Buswell, J. A.), pp. 265-284. Gordon & Breach
Pub. Lic: Philadelphia.
74
1 M^ B —^ M—M^MM^ BM^ BMl BMBW^MMI WM—WWMWl—MM—MMWi_i__iiim™_iiiii
Page 88
References
Clutterbuck, A. J. 1993. Aspergillus nidulans. In: Genetic Maps (eds.
O'Brien, S. J.), pp. 234-268. Cold Srping Harbor Laboratory
Press: New York.
Cocking, E. C. 1972. Plant cell protoplasts-isolation and development.
Annual Review of Plant Physiology 23: 29-50.
Court, D. A. and Bertrand, H. 1992. Genetic organization and
structural features of maranhar, a senescence-inducing
mitochondrial plasmid of Neurospora crassa. Current Genetics
22: 385-397.
Court, D. A.,Griffiths, A. F. J., Kraus, S. R.,Russell, P. J. and
Bertrand, H. 1991. A new senescence-inducing mitochondrial
linear plasmid in field-isolated Neurospora crassa strains from
India. Current Genetics 19: 129-137.
Crossman,L. L. and Hudspeth, M. E. S. 1985. Fungal mitochondrial
genomes. Li: Gene Manipulation in Fungi (eds. Bennet, J. W. and
Lasure, L.), pp. 65-103. Academic Press: New York.
Davis, B. 1985. Factors influencing protoplast isolation. Li: Fungal
Protoplasts (eds. Peberdy, J. F. and Ferenczy, L.),pp. 45-71.
Marcel Dekker: New York.
Dinouel, N., Drissi,R.,Miyakawa, 1.,Sor, F., Rousset, S., Fukuhara,
H. 1993. Linear mitochondrial DNAs of yeasts: closed-loop
75
Page 89
References
Structure of the termini and possible linear-circular conversion
mechanisms. Molecular and Cellular Biology 13: 2315-2323.
Elliott, T. J. 1972. Sex and the single spore. In: Mushroom Science 8:
11-18.
Elliott, T. J. 1982. Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushrooms, ][n:
Tropical Mushrooms-Biological Nature and Cultivation Methods
(eds. Chang, S. T. and Quimio, T. H.). The Chinese University
Press: Hong Kong.
Elliott, T. J. and Challen, M. P. 1985. The breeding system of the
silver-siUc straw mushroom, Volvariella bombycina. Mushroom
Newsletter for the Tropics 6: 3-8.
Emerson, S. and Emerson, M. R. 1958. Production, reproduction and
reversion of protoplast like structures in the osmotic strain of
Neurospora crassa. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Science, U.S.A. 44: 668-671.
Fekete, A., Bantle, J. A.,Hailing,S. M. and Stich, R. W. 1992.
Amplification fragment length polymorphism in Brucella strains
by use of polymerase chain reaction with arbitrary primers.
Journal ofBacteriology 174: 7778-7783.
Finchan, J. R. S., Day, P. R. and Radford, A. 1979. Fungal Genetics.
Blackwell Scientific Publifications Ltd: Oxford.
76
Page 90
References
Foster, L. M., Kozak, K. R., Loftus, M. G., Stevens, J. and Ross,L
1993. The polymerase chain reaction and its application to
filamentous fungi. Mycological Research 97: 769-781.
Fukuda, M., Nakai, Y. F., Hibbet, D. S.,Matsumoto, T. and Hayashi,
Y. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment length
polymorphisms in natural populations of Lentinula edodes.
Mycological Research 98: 169-175.
Fukuhara, H.,Sor, S., Drissi, R.,Dinouel, N., Miyakawa, I.,Rousset,
S. and Viola, A. M. 1993. Linear mitochondrial DNAs of yeast:
frequency of occurrence and general features. Molecular and
CellularBiology 13(4): 2309-2314.
Griffiths, A. F. J. and Bertrand, H. 1984. Unstable cytoplasms in
Hawaiian strains of Neurospora intermedia. Current Genetics 8:
387-398.
Griffiths, A. F. J., Collins, R. A. and Nargang, F. E. 1995.
Mitochondrial genetics of Neurospora. Hi: The Mycota: Genetics
and Biotechnology (eds. Esser, K. and Lemke, P. A.),pp. 93-105.
Spring-Verlag: Berlin Heideberg.
Grossman, L. L. and Hudspeth, M. E. S. 1985. Fungal mitochondrial
genomes. Li: Gene Manipulations in Fungi (eds. Bennett, J. W.
and Lasure, L.), pp. 65-103. Academic Press: New York.
77
,
Page 91
References
Hamlyn, P. F.,Bradshaw, R. E., Mellon, F. M., Santiago, C. M.,
Wilson, J. M. and Peberdy, J. F. 1981. Efficient protoplast
isolation from fungi. Enzyme and Microbiological Technology 3:
321-325.
Heath, I. B. 1978. Experimental studies of mitosis in the fungi. In:
Nuclear Division in the Fungi (ed. Heath, I. B.), pp. 89-176.
Academic Press: New York.
Hermanns, J., Asseburg,A. and Osiewacz, H. D. 1994. Evidence for a
life span-prolonging effect of a linear plasmid in a longevity
mutant of Podospora anserina. Molecular & General Genetics
243: 297-307.
Hintz, W. E. A., Anderson, J. B. and Horgen, P. A. 1987. Nuclear
migration and mitochondrial inheritance in the mushroom
Agaricus bitorquis. Genetics 119:35-41.
Hocart, M. J. and Peberdy, J. F. 1990. Protoplasts and the
improvement of fungi used in biological control. Li:
Biotechnology of Fungi for Improving Plant Growth (eds.
Whipps, J. M. and Lumsden, R. D.),pp. 235-258. Cambridge
University Press: Cambridge.
Hudspeth, M. E. S. 1992. The fungal mitochondrial genome - a broader
prospective. Jn: Applied Mycology. Vol 4. Fungal Biotechnology
(eds. Arora, D. K.,Lander, R. P. E. and Mukeri, K. G), pp. 213-
242. Marcel Dekker Lic: New York, Basel and Hong Kong.
78
Page 92
References
Jin, T.,Sonnemberg, A. S. M., Van Griensven, L. J. L. D. and Horgen,
P. A. 1992. Investigation of mitochondrial transmission in
selected matings between homokaryons from commercial and
wild-collected isolates of Agaricus bisporus {=Agaricus
bmnnescens). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58(11):
3553-3560.
Kafer, E. 1977. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and
its chromosomal aberrations. Advances in Genetics 19: 33-131.
Kerrigan, R. W. and Ross, L K. 1989. Allozymes of a wild Agaricus
bisporus population: new alleles, new genotypes. Mycologia 81:
433-443.
Kerrigan, R. W., Royer, J. C., Baller, L. M., Kohli, Y., Horgen, P. A.
and Anderson, J. B. 1992. Meiotic behavior and linkage
relationship in the secondarily homothallic fungus Agaricus
bisporus. Genetics 133: 225-236.
Khush, R. S.,Becker, E. and Wach, M. 1992. DNA amplification
polymorphisms of the cultivated mushroom Agaricus bisporus.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology: 2971-2977.
Kitamoto, Y.,Mori, N.,Yamamoto, M., Phiwa, T. and Ichikawa, Y.
1988. A simple method for protoplast formation and improvement
of regeneration from various fungi using an enzyme from
79
Page 93
References
Trichoderma reesei. Journal of General Microbiology 131: 1339-
1347.
Kohli, J. 1987. Genetic nomenclature and gene list ofthe fission yeast
Schizosaccharomyces pombe L. Current Genetics 11: 575-590.
KuUcami, R. K. 1991. DNA polymorphisms in Lentinula edodes, the
shiitake mushroom. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57:
1735-1739.
Kwan, H. S., Chiu, S. W., Pang, K. M. and Cheng,S. C. 1992. Strain
typing in Lentinula edodes by polymerase chain reaction.
ExperimentalMycology 16: 163-166.
Kwok, S. and Sninsky, J. J. 1989. Application ofPCR to the detection
ofhuman infectious disease. In: PCR Technology: Principles and
Applications for DNA Amplification (ed. Erlich, H. A.),pp. 235-
250. Stockton University Press: New York.
Lau, W. C., Dhillon, E. K. S. and Chang, S. T. 1985. Isolation and
reversion of protoplasts of Pleurotus sajor-caju. MIRCEN
Journal 1: 345-353.
Lee,S. B. and Taylor, J. W. 1993. Uniparental inheritance and
replacement of mitochondrial DNA in Neurospora tetrasperma.
Genetics 134(4): 1063-1075.
80
Page 94
References
Li, A. and Horgan, P. A. 1993. Evidence for cytogine methylation in
ribosomal RNA genes and in a family of dispersed repetitive
DNA elements in Agaricus bisporus and selected Agaricus
species. Experimental Mycology 17: 356-361.
Li, G. S. F. 1977. Cytological and Genetical Analysis on the Life
Cycle of Volvariella volvacea. M Phil, thesis. The Chinese
University ofHong Kong: Hong Kong.
Li, S. F. and Chang, S. T. 1978. Variation in the homothallic
basidiomycete, Volvariella volvacea. Mushroom Science 10: 171-
184.
Li, S. X. 1991. Genetical and Cytological Studies on Variations of
Volvariella volvacea. Ph.D thesis. The Chinese University of
Hong Kong: Hong Kong.
Marota, R., Colin, Y., Goursot, R. and Bemadi, G. 1982. A region of
extreme instability in the mitochondrial genome of yeast. EMBO
Journal 1: 529-534.
May, B. and Royse, D. J. 1981. Applications of the electrophoretic
methodology to the elucidation of genetic life histories of edible
mushrooms. Mushroom Science 11: 799-817.
Meinecke, G. 1960. Protoplasts from Penicillium glaucum. Nature,
London 188: 246.
81
Page 95
References
Mendoza, C. G., Avellan, M. A., Sanchez,E. and Novaes-Ledieu, M.
1987. Differentiation and wall chemistry of Agaricus bisporus
vegetative and aggregated mycelia. Archives ofMicrobiology 148:
68-71.
Miles, P. G. 1991. Biological background for mushroom breeding. In:
Genetics and Breeding of Edible Mushrooms (eds. Chang, S. T.,
Buswell, J. A. and Miles, P. G.), pp.37-63. Gordon and Breach
Sci. Pub: Philadelphia.
Miles, P. G. and Chang, S. T. 1986. Application of biotechnology in
strain selection and development of edible mushrooms. ASEAN
Food Journal 2: 3-10.
Moore, D. 1975. Production of Coprinus protoplasts by use of
chitinase and helicase. Transactions of the British Mycological
Society 65: 134-136.
Mullis, K. B., Faloona, F. A.,Scharf, S.,Saiki, R., Hom, G. and
Erlich, H. 1986. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in
vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harbor
Symposium on Quantitive Biology 51: 263-273.
Mullis K. B. and Faloona F. A. 1987. Specific synthesis of DNA in
vitro via a polymerase catalysed chain reaction. Methods in
Enzymology 155: 335-350.
82
Page 96
References
Myers, C., Griffiths, A. F. J. and Bertrand, H. 1989. Linear Kalio DNA
is a Neurospora mitochondrial plasmid that integrate into the
mitochondrial DNA. Molecular and General Genetics 220: 113-
120.
Nga, B. H. and Roper, J. A. 1968. Quantitative intrachromosomal
changes arising at mitosis in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 58:
193-209.
Ochman, H., Medhora,M.,Garza, D. and Hartl, D. L. 1990.
Amplification of flanking sequences by inverse PCR. Li: PCR
Protocols (eds. Innis, M.,Gelfand,D.,Sninsky, J. and White, T.),
pp. 219-227. Academic Press: New York.
Orbach, M. J., Volkath, D., Davis, R. W. and Yanofsky, C. 1988. An
electrophoretic karyotype of Neurospora crassa. Molecular and
CellularBiology%: 1469-1473.
Papa, K. E. 1977. The parasexual cycle in Aspergillus parasiticus.
Mycologia 70: 766-773.
Peberdy, J. F. 1985. Mycolytic enzymes. In: Fungal protoplasts (eds.
Peberdy, J. F. and Ferenczy, L.),pp. 31-44. Marcel Dekker: New
York.
83
Page 97
References
Peberdy, J. F. 1989. Fungi without coats-protoplasts as tools for
mycological research. Mycological Research 93: 1-20.
Peberdy, J. F. 1991. Fungal protoplast. Jn: More Gene Manipulations
in Fungi (eds. Bennett, J. W. and Lasure,L. A.), Academic
Press: San Diego.
Peberdy, J. F. 1995. Fungal protoplasts. In: The Mycota: Genetics and
Biotechnology (eds. Esser, K. and Lemke, P. A.),pp. 49-60.
Spring Verlag: Berlin, Heideberg.
Peberdy, J. F. and Fox, H. M. 1991. Protoplast technology and edible
mushrooms, bi: Genetics and Breeding of Edible Mushrooms
(eds. Chang, S. T., Miles, P. G. and Buswell, J. A.),pp. 125-155.
Gordon & Breach Sci. Pub: Philadelphia.
Plummer, K. M. and Howlett, B. J. 1993. Major chromosome length
polymorphisms are evident after meiosis in the phytopathogenic
fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Current Genetics 24: 107-113.
Pukkila, P. J. 1992. Methods of genetic manipulation in Coprinus
cinereus. Li: Genetics and Breeding of Edible Mushrooms (eds.
Chang, S. T.,Miles,P. G. and Buswell, J. A.),pp. 249-264.
Gordon & Breach Sci. Pub: Philadelphia.
Quaye, J. R. 1986. Evidence for haploidy of the basidiospores of
Volvariella volvacea from gamma radiation studies. Mushroom
Journal for the Tropics 7: 39-44.
84
Page 98
References
Rafalski, J. A. and Tingey, S. V. 1993. Genetic diagnostics in plant
breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends in
Genetics 9: 275-280.
Raper, C. A. 1976. Sexuality and life cycle ofthe edible WiXAAgaricus
bitorquis. Journal of General Microbiology 95: 54-66.
Raper, J. R. 1966. Genetics of Sexuality in Higher Fungi. Ronald
Press: New York.
Raper, J. R. and Raper, C. A. 1972. Life cycle and prospects for
interstrain breeding in Agaricus bisporus. Mushroom Biology 8:
1-9.
Royse, D. J. and May, B. 1992. Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for
the genetic analysis of edible mushrooms. Hi: Genetics and
Breeding of Edible Mushrooms (eds. Chang, S. T., Miles, P. G.
and Buswell, J. A.),pp. 225-247. Gordon & Breach Sci. Pub:
Philadelphia.
Royse, D. J., Jodon, M. H.,Antonio, G. G. and May, A. P. 1987.
Confirmation of intraspecific crossing and single and joint
segregation of biochemical loci of Volvariella volvacea.
ExperimentalMycology 11: 11-18.
85
Page 99
References
Santiago, C. M. 1982. Production of Volvariella protoplasts by use of
Trichoderma enzyme. Mushroom Newsletter for the Tropics 3: 3-
6.
Selitremiikoff, C. P. and Bloomfield, E. C. 1984. Formation and
regeneration of protoplasts of wild-type Neurospora crassa.
CurrentMicrobiology 11: 113-118.
Smith, C. L.,Matsumoto, T.,Niwa, O.,Klco, S., Fan, J. B., Yanagida,
M. and Canter, C. R. 1987. An electrophoretic karyotype for
Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain by pulse field gel
electrophoresis. NucleicAcids Research 15: 4481-4488.
Smith, D. A. 1974. Unstable diploids of Neurospora amd a model for
their somatic behaviour. Genetics 76: 1-17.
Smith, M. L. and Anderson, J. B. 1994. Mitochondrial DNAs of the
fungus Armillaria ostoyae.. restriction map and length variation.
Current Genetics 25: 545-553.
Sonnerberg, A. S., Wessels, J. G. H. and Van Griensven, L. J. 1988.
An efficient protoplastingA*egeneraton system for Agaricus
bisporus and Agaricus bitorquis. Current Microbiology 17: 285-
291.
86
M^Bl^M—^^^^M——M^M^—^H^—^—^^^——lWMfM—l———M,_"MiWiff___iii_i_,w___/i rii,i_ _•__••__
Page 100
References
Southern, E. M. 1975. Detection of specific sequences among DNA
fragements seperated by gel electrophoresis. Journal ofMolecular
Biology 98: 503-517.
Spear, M. C.,Royse, D. J. and May, B. 1983. Atypical meiosis and
segregation ofbiochemical loci mAgaricus brunnescens. Journal
ofHeredity 74: 417-420.
Tamova, G.,Betina, V. and Farkas, V. 1993. An efficient method for
producing protoplasts from Trichoderma virude. Folia
Microbiology 38: 214-218.
Tanaka, R. and Koga, I. 1972. Karyological studies on Lentinus
edodes, a basidiomycete. Janpanese Journal ofBotany 47: 289-
296.
Vickery, D. B. and Griffiths, A. J. F. 1993. Transcription ofthe kalio
linear senescence plasmid from Neurospora intermadia. Plasmid
29(3): 180-192.
Walz, M. 1995. Electrophoretic karyotyping. Li: The Mycota: Genetics
and Biotechnology (eds. Esser, K. and Lemke, P. A.),pp. 61-73.
Spring-Verlag: Berlin Heideberg.
Wang, C. W. 1982. Cellulolytic enzymes of Volvariella volvacea. In:
Tropical Mushrooms: Biological Nature and Cultivation Methods
87
Page 101
References
(eds. Chang, S. T. and Quimio, T. H.), pp. 167-186. The Chinese
University Press: Hong Kong.
Wang, Z. S., Liao, J. H., Li, F. G. and Wang, H. C. 1991. Studies on
genetic basis ofesterase isozyme loci Est A, B, and C mAgaricus
bisporus. Mushroom Science 13,3-9.
Welsh, J. and McClelland, M. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using
PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 7213-
7218.
Welsh, J.,Liu, J. P. and Efstratiadis, A. 1990. Cloning of PCR-
amplified total cDNA: construction of a mouse oocyte cDNA
library. GeneticAnalysis: Techniques andApplications 7: 5-17.
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee,S. and Taylor, R J. 1989. Amplification
and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for
phylogenetics. Jn: PCR Protocols (eds. Innis, M., Gelfand, D.,
Sninsky, J. and White, T.), pp. 315-322. Academic Press: New
York.
Whittaker, S. L., Assinder, S. L. and Shaw, D. S. 1994. Inheritance of
mitochondrial DNA in Phytophthora infestans. Mycological
Research 98: 569-575.
Williams, J. G. K., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. L., Rafalski, J. A. and
Tingey, S. V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary
88
iimillilllililMlillll I lll_l lllMlM^MII
Page 102
References
primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18:
6531-6535.
Wood, D. A. 1984. Microbial process in mushroom cultivation: a large
scale solid substrate fermentation. Journal of Chemical
Technology and Biotechnology 34B: 232-240.
Wood, D. A. and Fermor, T. R. 1982. Nutrition of Agaricus bisporus
in compost. The Mushroom Journal 114: 194-197.
Wyss, P. and Bonfante, P. 1993. Amplification of genomic DNA of
arbuscular-mycorrhizal (AM) fungi by PCR using short arbitrary
primers. Mycological Research 97: 1351-1357.
Yanagi, S. 0., Monma, M.,Kawasumi, T., Hino, A., Kito, M. and
Takebe, L 1985. Conditions for isolation of and colony formation
by mycelial protoplasts of Coprinus macrorhizus. Agricultural
and Biological Chemistry 49: 171-179.
Yang, X. and Griffiths, A. J. F. 1993. Male transmission of linear
plasmids and mitochondrial DNA in the fungus Neurospora.
Genetics 134(4): 1055-1062.
Yau, C. K. and Chang, S. T. 1972. Cotton waste for indoor cultivation
of straw mushroom. World Crops 24: 302-303.
89
^ BHI H ^ ^ HHII ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ IBHI ^ ^ ^ H HHBI ^ HI H ^ HHI HHIH ^ ^ B HasamMmnwrafl rasKii n tffnneftan Ki
Page 103
References
Yu, M. Y. and Chang, S. T. 1987. Effects of osmotic stabilizer on the
activities of mycolytic enzymes used in fungal protoplast
liberation. MIRCENJournal 3: 161-167.
Zhao, J. and Chang, S. T. 1993. Monokaryotization by protoplasting
heterothallic species of edible mushrooms. World Journal of
Microbiology and Biotechnology 9: 538-543.
90
I M MM BM ^ M B — — —l — — B ^ ———nmMi—MnMMimmmihi_i_i__i"ii_TrmimmnrrnKinm_ii_"_•••_
Page 105
CUHK L i b r a r i e s
_ _ l l l l _ l : 0D3SflT37^