Top Banner
A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC
24

A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

Corey Carter
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

A General Theory of Regulation

Stuart A. UmplebyThe George Washington University

Washington, DC

Page 2: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

The foundation of cybernetics

• Two basic elements – regulator and system being regulated

• Circular causal relations between the two

• Examples in biology – light on retina, hunger, thirst, hormones

• Examples in social systems – purposeful activities, driving a car, managing a firm; self-awareness, reflection, strategy

Page 3: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Facets of cybernetics 1• Computer science, artificial intelligence --

Alan Turing, John von Neumann,

• Electrical engineering, control systems, automation -- Norbert Wiener,

• Neurophysiology, experimental epistemology -- Warren McCulloch,

• Biology of cognition and psychotherapy, consciousness studies – Bateson, Maturana, Watzlawick

Page 4: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Facets of cybernetics 2

• Management – Beer, Ackoff, Malik

• Media studies and literary analysis – Clark, Hayles, Krippendorff

• Social sciences – Deutsch, Buckley, Luhmann, Mueller

• Design, architecture, education – Pask, Glanville, Scott

Page 5: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Stages in the development of cybernetics in the US

• First order cybernetics – circular causality, engineering cybernetics, 1940s to 1974

• Second order cybernetics – the role of the observer, biological cybernetics, 1974 to early 1990s

• Social cybernetics – interaction between ideas and society, design of intellectual movements, early 1990s to 2000s

• Cybernetics and philosophy of science

Page 6: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Example: Amplifying management capability

Page 7: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

A basic principle in cybernetics: The law of requisite variety

• Formulated by Ross Ashby in 1952

• The variety in a regulator must be at least as great as the variety in the system being regulated

• Span of control in management

• Given limited human cognitive capacity, how do we manage social organizations?

Page 8: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

W. Ross Ashby

Page 9: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Four strategies of regulation

• One-to-one regulation of variety: football, war, assumes complete hostility

• One-to-one regulation of disturbances: crime control, build institutions

• Change the rules of the game: anti-trust regulation, preventing price fixing

• Change the game: the change from ideological competition to sustainable development

Page 10: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

How complexity is controlled

• Each strategy allows an amplification of regulatory capability of about a factor of a thousand

• Regulation must occur throughout, but not necessarily by the regulator. For example, companies regulate each other through competition within rules set by the government

Page 11: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Example: A multi-disciplinary theory of social change

Page 12: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

  

Ideas

Variables Groups

Events

 A model of social change using four methods for describing

systems

Page 13: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Ways that disciplines describe social systems

• Variables – physics, economics

• Events – computer science, history

• Groups – sociology, political science

• Ideas – psychology, philosophy, cultural anthropology

• Interaction between ideas and events, a “shoelace model”

Page 14: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.
Page 15: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Advantages of using all four methods

• A richer description of the social system is produced

• Important considerations are less likely to be overlooked

• The theories and methods of more than one discipline are used

Page 16: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

  

Ideas

Variables Groups

Events

 A reflexive theory operates at two levels

Page 17: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

A study of three journals

• Record the country of the lead author of each article in 3 English language journals

• Sum the number of articles for each region (or country)

• Articles by N. American (or U.S.) authors have declined

• Articles by European and Asian authors have increased

Page 18: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Total articles per year by region over time in three journals

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

Years

Total

numb

er of

artic

als

Africa

Asia

Europe

Latin America

M iddle East

North America

Oceania

Page 19: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Trend f or Top 10 Count r i es

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1974 2010

Year

Numb

er

USA

UK

Chi na

Canada

Aust ral i a

Spai n

Germany

France

Aust r i a

Pol and

Page 20: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

The current state of cybernetics

• The larger field (see “facets of cybernetics” above) is not known in the U.S.

• No educational programs in the U.S.

• To most people “cyber” means computers, nothing more

• Growing interest in Europe and Asia

• Lack of interest in the U.S. is due to a lack of interest in general theories

Page 21: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Policy challenges

• Supporting research in cybernetics

• Supporting education in cybernetics

• Does the U.S., which was the leading creator of cybernetics, want to abandon the field to other countries?

• Cybernetics provides a theory of an information society

Page 22: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Conferences in summer 2014

• American Society for Cybernetics, GW, Washington, DC, August 3-9, 2014, 50th Anniversary meeting, www.isss.org

• International Society for the Systems Sciences, GW, Washington, DC, July 27 – August 1, 2014, www.asc-cybernetics.org

Page 23: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

Contact information

Stuart A. Umpleby

Department of Management

The George Washington University

Washington, DC

www.gwu.edu/~umpleby

[email protected]

Page 24: A General Theory of Regulation Stuart A. Umpleby The George Washington University Washington, DC.

A presentation prepared for the

Policy Studies Organization

Sixth Annual Dupont Summit

Washington, DC

December 6, 2013