A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER RACIAL DESEGREGATION: RACIAL DESEGREGATION: TSHWANE, 2000 - 2010 TSHWANE, 2000 - 2010 André Carl Horn Paper presented at the Conference on Emerging Urban Transformations Emerging Urban Transformations IGU Commission Meeting Canterbury Christ Church University 14 – 20 August 2011 14 – 20 August 2011
18
Embed
A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER RACIAL DESEGREGATION: TSHWANE, 2000 - 2010 André Carl Horn Paper presented at the Conference on Emerging Urban Transformations.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER RACIAL DESEGREGATION:RACIAL DESEGREGATION:
TSHWANE, 2000 - 2010TSHWANE, 2000 - 2010
A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER A DECADE OF CHANGE IN LEARNER RACIAL DESEGREGATION:RACIAL DESEGREGATION:
(3) EXPOSURE OF RACE GROUPS TO ‘OTHERS’(3) EXPOSURE OF RACE GROUPS TO ‘OTHERS’(3) EXPOSURE OF RACE GROUPS TO ‘OTHERS’(3) EXPOSURE OF RACE GROUPS TO ‘OTHERS’
EXPOSURE TO ‘OTHER RACES’ IN ALL SCHOOLS IN TSHWANE
(3) ISOLATION AND EXPOSURE (3) ISOLATION AND EXPOSURE (3) ISOLATION AND EXPOSURE (3) ISOLATION AND EXPOSURE
ISOLATION AND EXPOSURE OF RACE GROUPS IN SCHOOLS IN TSHWANE
2010 [2005] (2000) Africans Coloureds Indians White s
Isolation (<10% ; >90%) 87.7 [83.7]
(85.1)
36.1 [33.6]
(26.4)
49.4 [41.0]
(48.7)
65.9 [62.0]
(64.3)
Marginal Exposure (10 - <25% ; >75 – 100%)
6.0 [7.2]
(5.2)
34.1 [38.8]
(39.1)
32.9 [42.3]
(9.3)
13.7 [15.7]
(14.5)
Proper Exposure (>25% ; <75%)
6.2 [9.2]
(9.7)
29.8 [27.7]
(34.7)
17.7 [16.7]
(42.0)
20.4 [22.4]
(21.3)
(4) RACIAL DISTRIBUTION PER SCHOOL (4) RACIAL DISTRIBUTION PER SCHOOL CATEGORIES CATEGORIES
(4) RACIAL DISTRIBUTION PER SCHOOL (4) RACIAL DISTRIBUTION PER SCHOOL CATEGORIES CATEGORIES
RACIAL DISTRIBUTION PER SCHOOL CATEGORIES 2000/2005/2010 Africans Coloureds Indians Whites
DET (Africans)
72.9 63.8
38.0
1.7 0.8
0.6
0.0 0.0
0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0
HOR (Coloureds)
1.4 1.2
0.9
56.2 46.4
37.9
0.4 0.2
0.3
0.0 0.0
0.0
HOD 2.9 1.8 39.4 0.0
(Indians) 2.4 1.8
1.9 1.3
25.4 25.8
0.0 0.0
HOA (Whites)
11.0 14.6
13.3
34.3 41.8
43.2
20.5 28.1
27.8
92.8 87.7
87.3
PU-New 5.6
10.0 39.3
1.8 2.8
10.3
7.1 6.1
8.4
0.8 1.5
1.5
IS 6.5
7.8 6.7
4.1 6.4
6.6
32.6 40.0
37.6
6.3 10.8
11.2
(5) TRAJECTORY OF RACIAL CHANGE IN (5) TRAJECTORY OF RACIAL CHANGE IN SCHOOLS SCHOOLS
(5) TRAJECTORY OF RACIAL CHANGE IN (5) TRAJECTORY OF RACIAL CHANGE IN SCHOOLS SCHOOLS
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
00 10 50
% OTHERS
RA
NK
(bas
ed o
n Im
pact
)
507510025
DERACIALISATION ACHIEVED: RANKING SCHOOL CATEGORIES (2010)
PU HOA (whites)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONCONCLUSION
Moreover:(1) The number of learners increased with just over 56%. The Africans
increased with almost 94%. Whites have decreased by almost 18%. Coloureds increased by 31% and Indians by almost 24%.
(2) The increased number of Africans implied that only 38.0% (2010) from 72.9% are still in formerly African schools. 39.3% are in PU New schools with 13.3% in previous White schools (from 11.0% in 2000).
(3) Indians were already a minority in formerly Indian schools (39.4% in 1998) and 25.8% in 2010. There are more Indians in formerly Whites schools (27.8% in 2010) and 37.6% in Independent schools.
(4) Coloureds have been replaced as a majority in formerly Coloured schools (from 56.2% in 2000 to 37.9% in 2010). A large contingent are now in White schools (43.2 in 2010)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONCONCLUSION
In the course of a decade:
(4) Africans are extreme isolated, followed by Whites and then by Coloureds and Indians.
(5) Whites are being way ahead in terms of desegregation