FeedPrint Carbon Footprint Animal Nutrition Theun Vellinga, Wageningen UR Livestock Research Hans Blonk, Blonk Milieu Advies A database and calculation tool of the feed production chain to calculate GHG emissions by using LCA
Aug 07, 2015
FeedPrint
Carbon Footprint Animal Nutrition
Theun Vellinga, Wageningen UR Livestock Research
Hans Blonk, Blonk Milieu Advies
A database and calculation tool of the feed production chain
to calculate GHG emissions by using LCA
Scope of the FeedPrint project
Strategic goals:
awareness of and insight in GHG emissions
production chain of animal feed and from feed utilization;
identify potential mitigation options
not meant for use in carbon labelling !!
Operational goals:
Elaborate methodology: scientific sound, international alignment
Develop robust database
Develop calculation tool including animal nutrition
Methodology, database and tool are public available
Use of the CFP calculation tool “Feedprint”
Main users:
Compound feed industry and their suppliers
Main applications:
Strategic management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
International alignment and application
FAO, FEFAC, IDF, JRC, SCP-RT,...
Relationship FeedPrint and FAO/FEFAC
project FeedPrint NL
Database
Cultivation
Processing
Feed mill
Calculation CFP
Till Feed Intake
Calculation CFP
Feed Intake/
Nutrition/farm
FP
Upstr
eam
D
ow
n
str
ea
m
FeedPrint FAO/FEFAC
Database
Cultivation
(Processing)
(Feed mill)
Calculation CFP
Till Feed Intake
FP
Upstr
eam
Life Cycle Assessment in agricultural
systems ISO and others define basic LCA principles:
System Borders/Functional Units/Allocation rules
Agricultural systems are complex:
biological processes
diffuse sources, many (small) holdings
simulation models and calculation rules required
Data requirement and collection issues:
Process data, not (only) statistic outputs
Variation between farmers, locations and time
Modelling biological processes
2006 IPCC Guidelines
Emission factors N2O, CH4
N from crop residues
• Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use
– Chapter 10: livestock and manure management
– Chapter 11: nitrous oxide emissions from managed soils
– Enteric fermentation cattle: based on accepted Tier 3 (NIR)
LUC factor (All sectors and countries are
linked) Total CO2e emission by LUC
5.8 Gt per year
• (Ramankutty et al., 2007; Houghton, 2010)
Total agricultural land use from FAOstat (2008):
4.9 * 106 hectare
Emissions per ha :
1180 kg CO2-equivalents per ha per year
Emissions per kg:
1 000 kg/ha: 1.18 kg CO2e per kg
10 000 kg/ha: 0.118 kg CO2e per kg
Data in all kinds
Background processes:
• Energy production/ transport means/
capital goods/ chemicals
Foreground processes:
• Cultivation
• Industrial processing
• Compund feed production
• Transport
• Feed utilization
Default data
Ecoinvent, International Energy
Agency
Default data
Specific data
Required data
Crops Transp Processing Transp Feed mill
Emission kg CO2eq Data (average and distribution)
CO2fossil 1 fossil MJ and kg CO2e-MJ
CO2biogene 0 not calculated (+1 en -1)
CH4 25 measurement or according IPCC & NIR
N2O 298 calculated according IPCC based on N fluxes
Land use change:
m2*year 0.118
Fram Transp
Data analysis and interpretation
Multiple values, expert judgement:
• Pedigree matrix (Ecoinvent) used in decisions on average
values
• Confidentiality interval, uncertainty for all data
• Uniform, normal , lognormal or triangular distribution
• Monte Carlo simulation for limited set of data
Lack of data:
• standard procedure for defaults, e.g. MEXALCA
Allocation in processing and livestock production
Preferred approach in feed: economic allocation
Other options available: mass, gross energy
Show embedded (allocated) emissions
What enters “your” link in the chain
What is the contribution of your link
Allocation is only shifting emissions, it does not
change emissions.
Primary products
Primary product NL
Germ
any
Fra
nce
Belg
ium
UK
Pola
nd
Fin
land
Ukra
ine
Denm
ark
Esto
nia
Lithuania
Latv
ia
Hungary
S A
merica
Austr
alia
N
Am
erica
Asia
Barley X X X X X
Oats X X X X X X X X X
Corn X X X X X
Rye X X X X X X X X X
Wheat X X X X X
Triticale X X X X
Legumes X X X X X
Sugar beet X X X X X X
Sugar cane X X
Potatoes X X
Cassava X
Primary products
Primary product NL
Germ
any
Fra
nce
Belg
ium
UK
Pola
nd
Fin
land
Ukra
ine
Denm
ark
Esto
nia
Lithuania
Latv
ia
Hungary
S A
merica
Austr
alia
N
Am
erica
Asia
Rapeseed X X X X X X
Linseed X X X X X X
Oil palm X
Soy X X
Sunflower X X X X X
Grass fresh X
Grass silage X
Maize silage X
Lucerne X
Milk powder X X X X X X
Whey X X X X X X
Animal products X X X X X
Fish products X X X
Data collection plant raw materials
Yield (kg/ha) and dry matter content
Nutrients: N, P, K, energy (GE, ME, NE)
Crop residues
Inputs:
Synthetic fertilizer (N, P, K)
Manure
Pesticides
Seeds
Energy for cultivation (direct/indirect) and storage
Land Use and Land Use Change (LULUC)
Industrial processing
Milling, wet and dry: grains, potatoes
Crushing: pressing, extraction: oil seeds
Sugar refinery: beet and cane
Biofuel production: maize, wheat
Rendering: animal products
Artificial drying: whey, milk powder, roughages
Energy inputs, use of auxiliaries
Processing plant and animal products
Product in:
Mass
Dry matter
C, N, P
= 100
Co product 1 out:
Mass, DM, C, N, P, GE, €
Co products total out:
Mass, DM, C, N, P
= 100
€total
Co product 2 out:
Mass, DM, C, N, P, GE, €
Co product n out:
Mass, DM, C, N, P, GE, €
Processing
(split up in
1 – 4 sub
processes)
Mitigation options, a protocol at sector level
FeedPrint contains secondary, default, data,
A protocol describes:
when to use secondary data
when to collect additional primary activity data
how to account for them
Basic principle:
communication on improved performance
must be based on primary activity data
Thank you for listening