Top Banner
1 Lakes Lakes Wolfe Island Shoals Wolfe Island Shoals A Case Study in Offshore Wind Farm A Case Study in Offshore Wind Farm Project Management Project Management Pulling It All Together Pulling It All Together An Exercise in Permitting & An Exercise in Permitting & Logistics Logistics Presented by: Andrew Chant/Uwe Presented by: Andrew Chant/Uwe Roeper Roeper Infocast Freshwater Great Lakes Infocast Freshwater Great Lakes Offshore Wind Conference Offshore Wind Conference July 19 - 21, 2010 July 19 - 21, 2010 Cleveland, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio
35
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

11

Navigating the Offshore ShoalsNavigating the Offshore ShoalsHow Not to Go Aground in the Great LakesHow Not to Go Aground in the Great Lakes

Wolfe Island ShoalsWolfe Island ShoalsA Case Study in Offshore Wind Farm A Case Study in Offshore Wind Farm

Project ManagementProject ManagementPulling It All TogetherPulling It All Together

An Exercise in Permitting & LogisticsAn Exercise in Permitting & Logistics

Presented by: Andrew Chant/Uwe RoeperPresented by: Andrew Chant/Uwe Roeper

Infocast Freshwater Great Lakes Infocast Freshwater Great Lakes Offshore Wind Conference Offshore Wind Conference

July 19 - 21, 2010July 19 - 21, 2010Cleveland, OhioCleveland, Ohio

Page 2: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

22

What is Wolfe Island Shoals?What is Wolfe Island Shoals?

• 300 MW Offshore Wind Facility under 300 MW Offshore Wind Facility under development by Windstream Energy Inc.development by Windstream Energy Inc.

• Approximate capital cost $1.5 BillionApproximate capital cost $1.5 Billion

• Awarded PPA under Ontario’s Feed-in Tariff Awarded PPA under Ontario’s Feed-in Tariff ProgramProgram

• Located eastern end of Lake Ontario, south of Located eastern end of Lake Ontario, south of Kingston, west of Wolfe Island Kingston, west of Wolfe Island

• Scheduled Mandatory Commercial Operations Scheduled Mandatory Commercial Operations Date – September, 2014Date – September, 2014

Page 3: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

33

Location of Wolfe Island Location of Wolfe Island ShoalsShoals

Page 4: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

44

HighlightsHighlights

• 300 MW off-shore wind 300 MW off-shore wind project with PPA, land & project with PPA, land & grid connectiongrid connection– Final stages of securing Final stages of securing

development financing development financing for permitting & designfor permitting & design

– Total Projected CapEx = Total Projected CapEx = $1.5 Billion$1.5 Billion

– Permitting & design in Permitting & design in 2010 / 20112010 / 2011

– Construction in 2012 / Construction in 2012 / 20132013

– Lake Ontario, Canada Lake Ontario, Canada

Page 5: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

55

ORTECH’s Role Who is ORTECH?• Multidisciplinary renewable energy and environmental

consulting firm• Active in renewable energy directly and through affiliates

for over 10 years• Over 30 years of experience in atmospheric sciences• Through a related company, the original developer of Wolfe

Island Wind facility completed by Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc., now TransAlta

• Client base consists of financial institutions, infrastructure investors and private developers

• Appointed Project Manager for Wolfe Island Shoals in May 2010

• Strong emphasis on advanced wind resource assessment, permitting, O & M planning and costs, financial and economic analysis

Page 6: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

66

Project Schedule

Project PhasesPhase I – Pre-Bid/FIT SubmissionObjectives: Evaluate Site

Obtain Access to LandPrefeasibility StudyPreliminary Wind StudiesVery High Risk Seed Capital

Observations: Balancing act – Need to spend enough to prove site potential but minimize pain of write off if unsuccessful

Timing: 2008-2009

Page 7: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

77

Project Schedule – Cont’d

Phase II – Design, Permitting & EngineeringObjectives: Determine Project Scope

Begin Detailed Wind Data Collection & AnalysisStart Permitting ProcessDo Preliminary LayoutCarry Out Lake Bed Soil TestingEvaluate Turbine OptionsBegin Successive Refinements of Budget &

SchedulesObservations: High Risk Capital

Tasks Must be Undertaken SimultaneouslyPhase Timing: 2010 - 2012

Page 8: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

88

Project Schedule – Cont’d

Phase III – Finalize Project • Select turbine• Optimize Layout• Complete Permitting• Execute TSA & OSA• Complete Financial Close• Make Turbine Deposit• Begin Foundation ConstructionObservations: Construction Capital Has Less RiskTiming: 2012-2013

Page 9: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

99

Project Schedule – Cont’d

Phases IV & VPhase IV – Construction• Foundations Completed• Turbines Delivered to Lay Down Site• Underwater Cabling Completed• O & M Training Undertaken• Turbine Erection Completed• Commissioning Completed

Phase V – Commercial Operation• Operation to WTG Supplier• Cheques from OPA Begin to Arrive

Timing: 2013 - 2014

Page 10: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1010

Special Problems of Offshore Wind•Permitting

•Engineering

•Logistics

•Turbine Selection

•Marine Transport

•Foundations

•O & M•Crew Training•Provincial

Content•Financing

Page 11: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1111

Permitting – More than the Usual SuspectsFederal Ministries & Agencies• Transport Canada• St Lawrence Seaway Authority• Coast Guard• Fisheries & Oceans Canada• RCMP• CBC• NRCan• Canadian Environmental Assessment

Agency

Page 12: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1212

Permitting – More than the Usual Suspects - ContinuedProvincial Ministries

• MNR

• MOE

• MOEI

• OPA

• Ministry of Culture

• Ministry of Transport

Page 13: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1313

Permitting – More than the Usual Suspects- ContinuedOther Potentially Interested Parties

• International Joint Commission

• Homeland Security

• US Coast Guard

• USAF

• NYPA

• US Army Corps of Engineers

• FAA

• NRA

Page 14: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1414

Wolfe Island Shoals – Boundary & Connection Point

Page 15: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1515

Permitting Constraints - 1

Set Backs & Boundaries

Page 16: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1616

Permitting Constraints – 2

Airports & Air Bases

Page 17: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1717

Permitting Constraints – 3 Buffers & Turbine Layout

Page 18: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1818

Permitting Constraints - 4Layout & Water Depth

Page 19: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

1919

Permitting Constraints – 5

Ship Wrecks & Nesting Areas

Page 20: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2020

US Army Creates World’s Worst PowerPoint

Slide A New Standard of Excellence?

Page 21: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2121

Permitting Constraints – The Mash Up

A Contender

Page 22: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2222

Engineering

•Soil Testing

•Wind Data Collection

•Foundation Design & Construction

•Collector Systems & Underwater Cabling

•Transformer Station Location

Page 23: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2323

The Importance of Soil Testing

Photo Courtesy of Advanced Offshore Solution

Page 24: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2424

Conventional Off-shore Conventional Off-shore DesignDesign

• Conventional Turbine (eg. Siemens Conventional Turbine (eg. Siemens 2.3/93, GE 3.6/107 or Vestas 2.3/93, GE 3.6/107 or Vestas V90/3MW)V90/3MW)

• Wolfe Island shoals: 5m (15’) to 20m Wolfe Island shoals: 5m (15’) to 20m (60’) water depth (2 km to 10 km (60’) water depth (2 km to 10 km from shoreline) similar to existing from shoreline) similar to existing projectsprojects

• Limestone rock bottom suitable for Limestone rock bottom suitable for proven foundation design: Drilled proven foundation design: Drilled monopile (tentative)monopile (tentative)

• Conventional underwater cable (34.5 Conventional underwater cable (34.5 kW) with substation and on-shore kW) with substation and on-shore grid connection (230 kW)grid connection (230 kW)

• Proven Technology: Existing 200 MW Proven Technology: Existing 200 MW Wolfe Island on-shore wind farm also Wolfe Island on-shore wind farm also uses underwater cable (230 kW) to uses underwater cable (230 kW) to go from island to grid on mainland go from island to grid on mainland (installed 2009). Underwater cables (installed 2009). Underwater cables common for islands in Lake Ontario.common for islands in Lake Ontario.

Page 25: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2525

Turbine Selection• WTG Nameplate Capacity• Reliability

Logistics• Availability of Port Facilities• Transportation to Port• Access to On Shore Cranes• Scheduling• Size of Laydown Area• Shared Facilities

Page 26: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2626

Required Port Facilities

Photo Courtesy of Advanced Offshore Solutions

Page 27: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2727

O &M

•Costs

•Waterborne Access to Turbines

•Planned Maintenance

•Turbine Performance Monitoring

•Parts and Component Inventories

Page 28: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2828

Marine Transport•Availability of Special Purpose Vessels•National Shipping Restrictions: US

Jones Act, Canada Coastal Shipping Act•Marine Crane Availability•Transportation of Partially Assembled

WTGs•Possible Solution: Convert existing self

unloader.

Page 29: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

2929

European Marine Transport

Photo Courtesy of Advanced Offshore Solutions

Page 30: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

3030

Typical Great Lakes Self Unloader

Page 31: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

3131

Crew Training

• Safety Issues

• Inclement Weather

• Subcontractors

• Housing

Provincial Content

• European Expertise

• Turbine Selection

• Underwater Cabling

Page 32: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

3232

Financing

•Comparison to On Shore

•Capital Costs

•PPA Pricing

•Portfolio Financing

•Use of Tax Benefits

Page 33: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

3333

Summary

• Difficult but not impossible• Requires careful planning and execution• Special problems give rise to market

opportunities for Ontario & Great Lakes suppliers

• Possible opportunity to supply services to neighbouring Great Lakes states

• There are no insurmountable problems that are not opportunities.

• “Yes we can!”

Page 34: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

3434

Contact Information

To Review Presentation see Infocast Website or www.ortech.ca

For Further Information Contact:[email protected] ext 463

or [email protected] ext 248

Page 35: A case study in offshore wind farm project management

3535

Thank You for Your AttentionThank You for Your Attention