National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011 – 2020 Strategic Plan in Malaysia (NBSAP) A Biodiversity Enabling Activity Project Implemented by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Supported by United Nations Development Programme with Global Environment Facility Grant Financing and Co-financing from the Government of Malaysia INCEPTION REPORT JANUARY 2014
72
Embed
A Biodiversity Enabling Activity Project Implemented by ...€¦ · APC APR/PIR AWP Assistant Project Coordinator Annual Project Review/Project Implementation Report Annual Work Plan
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
National Biodiversity Planning to Support the
Implementation of the CBD 2011 – 2020 Strategic Plan in Malaysia (NBSAP)
A Biodiversity Enabling Activity Project Implemented by the Ministry of Natural Resources and
Environment
Supported by United Nations Development Programme with Global Environment Facility Grant Financing
and Co-financing from the Government of Malaysia
INCEPTION REPORT
JANUARY 2014
2
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................. 5 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 6
3.4 Changes to the Strategic Result Framework………………………….……..…..20 3.5 Procurement Plan …………………………………………………...…………..…22 4.0 Challenges Ahead .............................................................................................. 22 5.0 References ........................................................................................................ 23 Annex I: Terms of Reference of National Steering Committee (NSC).………………24 Annex II: Terms Of Reference of Technical Working Group 1 on Biodiversity Assessment ............................................................................................................. 26 Annex III: Terms of Reference on Technical Working Group 2 on Biodiversity Policies, Strategies & Action Plans for NBSAP and TEEB ....................................... 27 Annex IV: Revised Strategic Result Framework ...................................................... 28 Annex V: Revised Project Schedule ......................................................................... 32 Annex VI: Procurement Plan ……………………………………………………………..35 Annex VII: Terms of Reference on Revision of National Policy on Biological Diversity, Development of National Biodiversity Strategies, Targets and Action Plans ........... 36 Annex VIII: Draft Terms of Reference on Strategic Study on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) – Scoping Exercise ....................................... 45 Annex IX: Terms of Reference for Preparation of Fifth National Report to United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) ................................................... 52 Annex X: Summary Report of the NBSAP Inception Workshop ............................... 61
3
Executive Summary
The National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the Convention
on Biological Diversity 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Malaysia (NBSAP) is a project
implemented by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE). This
project is implemented with the grant financing from the Global Environment Facility
(GEF), co-financing from the Government of Malaysia (GoM) and supported by the
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Malaysia. The objective of this
project is to integrate Malaysia‟s obligations under the United Nations Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD) into its national development and sectoral planning
frameworks through a renewed and participative biodiversity planning and
strategising process, aligning the results of the process to the global guidance
contained in the global Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (SPB).
This project also responds to the findings of the National Capacity Self-Assessment
for Global Environmental Management (NCSA) project conducted in 2008 that
recommended assessment on the current status of biodiversity vis-à-vis the
implementation of National Policy on Biological Diversity 1998 be conducted. It also
suggested that the Policy be reviewed to reflect the nation‟s priorities in biodiversity.
In 2010, the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted the SPB and its Aichi
Biodiversity Targets that called for a renewed global effort to halt biodiversity loss.
Country Parties are required to develop or update their NBSAP and report on their
NBSAP progress, its implementation and mainstreaming of biodiversity in the Fifth
National Report to CBD which is due in March 2014 and subsequently to the 12 th
Conference of Parties (COP 12) of the CBD in October 2014. To facilitate the
NBSAP process in Malaysia, a proposal was submitted to the Global Environment
Facility (GEF) to be eligible for funding. The proposal was approved by GEF on 8
March 2012 and the project document was signed on 14 May 2012. This project will
be implemented in 3 and half years with a total funding of US$1,320, 000.
This project will be conducted in a participative and consultative manner and is
divided into three components namely (1) a participative stocktaking exercise on
biodiversity planning takes place and national biodiversity targets are developed in
response to the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets; (2) the NBSAP is revised/updated
and it fully integrates new aspects of the CBD strategic plan, such as mainstreaming
and anchoring the implementation of the plan into national development frameworks
and valuing ecosystem services; and (3) national frameworks for resource
mobilisation, Convention reporting and exchange mechanisms are strengthened.
In summary, the key NBSAP project outputs are (1) an updated National Policy on
Biological Diversity (NPBD) (2) national biodiversity strategies, targets and action
plans attuned to the SPB and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets; (3) a resource
mobilisation plan to implement the updated NPBD; and (4) three strategic studies
4
namely The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), assessment of
climate change impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity and the Program of Work on
Protected Areas (PoWPA).
The first National Steering Committee (NSC) meeting was held on 19 September
2012 to formally introduce the project to key stakeholders and to provide them the
opportunity to provide inputs to the project. The NSC reviewed and endorsed the
project‟s work plan and budget and adopted the Terms of Reference of the NSC with
amendments. The NSC also agreed with the establishment of Technical Working
Groups that will serve as technical arms to the project.
An Inception Workshop was held on 20 December 2012 at Royale Chulan Hotel,
Kuala Lumpur to introduce the project to wider stakeholders and to provide them an
opportunity to comment and give inputs on the strategic result framework, project
activities and schedule. The workshop was attended by over 30 participants
comprising representatives from federal and state government agencies, research
institutions and non-governmental organisations. Based on the inputs from the
inception workshop, revised strategic result framework and project schedule were
produced. All amended documents are presented as annexes in this report.
5
List of Abbreviations
APC APR/PIR AWP
Assistant Project Coordinator Annual Project Review/Project Implementation Report Annual Work Plan
BD EA Biodiversity Enabling Activities
CBD Convention on Biological Diversity
CDR Combined Delivery Report
CHM Clearing House Mechanism
CO Country Office (UNDP)
COP DOA DOF DMPM DWNP EPU EBA FRIM
Conference of the Parties Department of Agriculture Department of Fisheries Department of Marine Park Malaysia Department of Wildlife and National Parks Economic Planning Unit Ecosystem Based Adaptation Forest Research Institute Malaysia
GoM Government of Malaysia
GEF Global Environment Facility
NBSAP NCSA NPD NPBD NRE
National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans National Capacity Self-Assessment National Project Director National Policy on Biological Diversity Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Malaysia
PMU Project Management Unit
PoWPA CBD‟s Programme of Work on Protected Areas
QOR Quarterly Operational Reports
SRF SPB
Strategic Result Framework Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
TBW Total Budget and Work Plan
TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
TOR Term of Reference
TWG Technical Working Group
UNDP UNDP CO
United Nations Development Programme United Nations Development Programme Country Office
6
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Background
Malaysia is recognized as one of the twelve mega diverse countries in the world. Its
biodiversity are exceedingly rich comprising various ecosystems and species that
are important for national development and well being of the people of Malaysia. As
a commitment to conserve biodiversity, Malaysia became party to various Multilateral
Environmental Agreements (MEAs) and this includes the United Nations Convention
of Biological Diversity (CBD). Subsequent to becoming party to the CBD in 1994,
Malaysia developed its NBSAP which is known as the National Policy on Biological
Diversity (NPBD) in 1998 to guide the overall biodiversity management in the country
as well as to fulfill its obligations under the Convention.
At the global level, the finding of the Third Global Biodiversity Outlook concluded that
the 2010 global biodiversity targets adopted in 2002 were not fully met. This is
largely attributed to the lack of coherent efforts on biodiversity including limited
capacity in financial, human resource and technical aspects and limited biodiversity
mainstreaming. It further cautioned that biodiversity loss will continue to happen if
corrective measures are not taken. The Tenth Conference of the Parties to the CBD
further addressed this issue, culminated in the adoption of the CBD SPB 2011-2020
and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets in Nagoya, Japan in 2010. Target 17 of the Aichi
Targets states that “By 2015, each Party has developed, adopted as a policy
instrument, and has commenced implementing an effective, participatory and
updated national biodiversity strategy and action plan.” As part of the commitment
under the Convention, Country Parties are required to implement the SPB 2011-
2020 and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets and report on progress made in relation to
this at the latest by COP 12 in 2014.
In Malaysia, the NPBD provides a general and overarching strategies and action
plans with the vision of transforming Malaysia into a world centre of excellence in
conservation, research and utilization of tropical biological diversity by 2020. The
Policy outlined 15 key strategies and 87 action plans with regard to biodiversity
conservation and sustainable utilisation. Under the 2008 National Capacity Self-
Assessment for Global Environmental Management and National Capacity Action
Plan (NCSA), gaps hindering the effective implementation of the Policy were
identified and articulated. The NCSA then recommended that the NPBD be
reviewed, taking into account the current status of biodiversity and it also highlighted
the need to develop concrete biodiversity targets with clear timeframe for
implementation as well as delegation of duties and framework for implementation.
7
Under the NBSAP project, the NPBD will be reviewed taking into account the CBD
SPB and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets as well as national biodiversity priorities. This
project also addresses the country‟s need to continue to fulfill its obligation under
CBD, particularly on the Convention‟s Article 6 and the CBD COP Decision X/2.
GEF has approved Malaysia‟s project proposal in March 2012 with the funding of
USD 220,000 and co-financing amounting to USD500,000. This project will provide
an opportunity to Malaysia to review and update its NPBD and incorporate new
aspects of the SPB into the national development process, in accordance with
national circumstances.
In light of the SPB and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets, a number of elements will be
incorporated into the revised NBSAP and this include guidance to: a) fully realise
the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and incorporate these values into
national and local development and poverty reduction strategies (Targets 1 and 2);
b) to contribute towards increasing the conservation of global terrestrial and inland
water to at least 17 per cent, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially
areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services (Target 11); c)
restore and safeguard key ecosystem services, especially for water, health and
livelihoods (Target 14); and d) strengthen ecosystem resilience to climate change
and promote ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and
mitigation (Target 15).
1.2 Project Objective
The goal of the NBSAP project is to enable Malaysia to integrate its obligations in
light of the CBD SPB and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets. The specific objective of this
project is to integrate Malaysia‟s obligations under the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) into its national development and sectoral planning frameworks
through a renewed and participative biodiversity planning and strategizing process,
in a manner that is in line with the global guidance contained in the CBD Strategic
Plan for 2011-2020.
1.3 Project Outcomes, Outputs and Activities
In achieving the objective of the NBSAP project, its deliverables are structured into
three outcome components, namely:
Outcome 1: A participative stocktaking exercise on biodiversity planning
takes place and national biodiversity targets are developed in response to the
global Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
8
Outcome 2: The NBSAP is revised/updated and it fully integrates new
aspects of the CBD Strategic Plan, such as mainstreaming and anchoring the
implementation of the plan into national development frameworks, valuing
ecosystem services and promoting ecosystem-based adaptation and
resilience.
Outcome 3: National frameworks for resource mobilization, Convention
reporting and exchange mechanisms are established and strengthened.
The outcomes of the project, as well as the outputs and activities were discussed in
details in a series of stakeholder meetings and the project inception workshop. The
outputs and activities are described below and presented in Annex IV (Revised
Strategic Results Framework) and Annex V (Revised Project Schedule).
Outcome 1: Stocktaking and National Biodiversity Targets Setting The three outputs under this component and their activities are as follows:
Output 1.1 Review and stocktaking of products and results from previous
biodiversity planning processes at the national level are carried out in participative
manner.
Key activities under output 1.1 are:
1.1.1 Rapid stocktaking and review of relevant plans, policies and reports
This activity will focus on rapid stock taking of existing policies, plans and
practices related to biodiversity at various sectors at the national and state
level. The information gathered from the stock taking activity will be used as
the basis in identifying gaps in the existing NBSAP.
1.1.2 Identification of stakeholders, consultation and awareness
This activity will focus on ensuring a robust consultative process that engages
representatives from key sectors such as government agencies, states
government, research institutes, industries, NGOs, universities, and
traditionally under-represented groups including women during the revision of
the NBSAP. The aim is to develop and sustain a participatory process as part
of mainstreaming of biodiversity to increase ownership and buy-in from
relevant stakeholders for the implementation of the NBSAP.
Stakeholders identified to be engaged and under this NBSAP project are listed as follows:
9
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division & Environmental Management and Climate Change Division)
Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister‟s Department
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industries
Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities
Ministry of Tourism and Culture
Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation
Ministry of Housing and Local Government
Ministry of International Trade and Industries
Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia
Department of Wildlife and National Parks
Forest Research Institute Malaysia
Department of Agriculture
Department of Fisheries
Department of Marine Parks Malaysia
Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute
Town and Country Planning Department
Department of Indigenous People Development
State Economic Planning Units
Sabah Forestry Department
Ministry of Resource Planning and Environment, Sarawak
Sarawak Forest Department
State Forestry Departments
Natural Resources Office, Sabah
Sabah Biodiversity Centre
Sarawak Biodiversity Centre
Majlis Adat Istiadat, Sarawak
Maritime Institute of Malaysia (MIMA)
Centre for Indigenous People Concerns
Malaysian Nature Society
Third World Network
Wildlife Conservation Society
WWF Malaysia
10
The Indigenous Peoples Network of Malaysia (JOAS)
Partners of Community Organisations in Sabah (PACOS)
Relevant stakeholders other than those listed above will also be engaged as
and when necessary.
1.1.3 Rapid assessment of the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss highlighting the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their contribution to human well-being.
This activity will focus on rapid assessment of root causes for biodiversity loss
in Malaysia. This activity will also identify key threats and drivers of
biodiversity loss including the key aspects of the policy environment that form
the barriers and challenges for effective conservation and sustainable use of
biodiversity. The information gathered from the stock taking from activities
1.1.1 and 1.1.3 will be used as the basis in identifying key gaps in the existing
NBSAP, understanding the primary drivers and root causes for biodiversity
loss, as well as identifying the means of overcoming existing barriers and
challenges.
Output 1.2 In response to the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, national biodiversity
targets, strategies and action plans are developed in a manner that is attuned to
Malaysia‟s circumstances.
Key activity under output 1.2 is:
1.2.1 Setting national biodiversity targets, principles, and main priorities of the
strategy though national and sub-national consultations
Based on the global SPB 2011-2020 and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets,
Malaysia‟s national biodiversity strategies are developed and biodiversity
targets that are specific, measurable and time bound and their implementing
actions plans are developed. The national biodiversity targets will include
among others targets on conservation of ecosystems, protected area
coverage, and other aspects of the CBD Strategic Plan. These targets will be
developed in a participative and consultative manner, taking into account the
view and inputs by all relevant stakeholders at the national and sub-national
consultations. These targets will represent Malaysia‟s commitment in
implementing the CBD Strategic Plan 2011-2020 and will be presented to the
Convention‟s COP in due course.
11
Output 1.3 The achievement of national biodiversity targets, developed in line with
the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, is duly monitored during the project duration
and a mechanism put in place for post project monitoring, and this is reported at
national and international level among others CBD through national reports and
other means.
Key activity under output 1.3 is:
1.3.1 Putting in place implementation and monitoring mechanism for the updated NBSAP
The updated NBSAP and national biodiversity targets will be implemented by
relevant ministries, agencies and stakeholders. Implementation will be
monitored with the support of a dedicated institutional mechanism within the
NRE. The National Biodiversity Clearing House Mechanism could be utilised
as one of the platform to monitor the implementation of the updated NBSAP
and its action plans.
Outcome 2 NBSAP Update
Output 2.1: A National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) for Malaysia,
anchored into national development frameworks, is updated, in a manner that is
participative, widely disseminated and integrates new aspects of the CBD, such as:
(i) mainstreaming; and (ii) the valuing of ecosystem goods and services.
Key activities under output 2.1 are:
2.1.1 Develop the strategy and actions to implement the agreed targets though national and sub-national consultations.
The updating of the NBSAP and development of the national biodiversity
targets, strategies and action plans will be prepared through consensus
building process by engaging relevant stakeholders at the national and state
level.
The Term of Reference for the contract on „Revision of National Policy on Biological
Diversity, Development of National Biodiversity Strategies, Targets and Action Plans‟
is attached in Annex VII.
2.1.2 Development of specific action plans for terrestrial and marine ecosystems such as forestry, fisheries and agriculture sectors through consultations.
12
Action plans on terrestrial and marine ecosystems such as on forestry,
fisheries and agriculture sectors will be developed as part of the
mainstreaming approach. Relevant biodiversity mainstreaming tools will also
be explored and applied as appropriate.
2.1.3 In an iterative manner, Malaysia taps into useful information on, and participative into, global networks and initiatives on biodiversity data and indicators (such as biodiversity Indicators Partnership, Global Biodiversity Information Facility and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, the Global Environment Outlook portal, among other relevant ones).
This activity refers to participation of personnel in networks and initiatives
including workshops, meetings and various platform related to NBSAP that
will add value to increase the capacity of key personnel in domestic NBSAP
process.
Output 2.2: The updated and fully endorsed NBSAP for Malaysia is submitted to the
CBD preferably within the deadline set by the COP.
The key activity for output 2.2 is:
2.2.1 Submit updated NBSAP to National Biodiversity Council and Cabinet for approval; and subsequently to CBD Secretariat.
The updated National Policy on Biological Diversity which will be Malaysia‟s second generation NBSAP will undergo internal process for endorsement by the Cabinet. By COP 12 that is scheduled to be held in October 2014, a national report to CBD outlining Malaysia‟s second generation NBSAP will be made available.
Output 2.3: Strategic studies that support the update/revision of NBSAP are carried
out.
The key activity for output 2.3 will consist of 3 strategic studies namely:
TEEB strategic study: assessing and capturing value of biodiversity and
ecosystem services in Malaysia;
Development of the PoWPA Action Plan by integrating key Aichi Biodiversity
Targets into national implementation of the CBD‟s Programme of Work on
Protected Areas (PoWPA); and
A study to assess the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and
biodiversity.
The draft Terms of Reference for the TEEB Scoping Exercise is attached in Annex VIII.
13
Outcome 3: National Frameworks for NBSAP Implementation, CBD Reporting and
Exchange Mechanisms
Output 3.1: National frameworks for NBSAP implementation is in place and
includes: (i) institutional leadership for implementation is established and strategic
partnerships forged (nationally and internationally); (ii) a costed and prioritized Action
Plan is appended to the NBSAP; (iii) needs assessments on capacity, technology
and finance are carried out; and (iv) a strategy for resource mobilization for the
implementation of the NBSAP is produced and includes a baseline assessment of
existing biodiversity finance.
The key activities for output 3.1 are:
3.1.1 Capacity need assessment and development of a plan for capacity development for NBSAP implementation
A capacity gap analysis with regard to NBSAP and its implementation drawing
from the experience in implementing the NPBD 1998 will be conducted to map
the capacity need assessment. These gaps will be analysed and used as a
basis for the formulation of a plan for capacity development for the NBSAP
implementation.
3.1.2 Development of a communication and outreach strategy for the NBSAP and awareness on biodiversity, and implementation of outreach activities to disseminate NBSAP
A specific communication and outreach strategy for NBSAP will be developed under this project. This strategy will be used as a guide in carrying out outreach activities to disseminate information on the updated NBSAP. A Communication, Education and Public Awareness (CEPA) action plans on biodiversity will also be developed and embedded in the NBSAP communication and outreach strategy and will be used by NRE to implement its awareness activities.
Output 3.2: An effective, user-friendly and easily updatable country-driven CHM site
is developed; it is linked up to the CBD‟s global CHM networks and to the other
information and knowledge exchange network on biodiversity.
The key activity for output 3.2 is: 3.2.1 CHM Upgrading/Enhancement
Updating of the National Biodiversity Clearing House Mechanism will be
carried out on a regular basis to reflect on Malaysia‟s current biodiversity
status. The CHM will also serves as the information portal on the updated
NBSAP, national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans as well as a
platform to create awareness on biodiversity issues.
14
Output 3.3: Immediate CBD reporting obligations are met by Malaysia in a timely
manner: The Fifth National Report to the CBD by 31 March 2014.
The key activity for output 3.3 is: 3.3.1 Preparation and submission of the Fifth National Report to CBD
The 5th National report to the CBD will be prepared under the NBSAP project
in line with the country‟s obligation to report on biodiversity status and trends
as well as progress made towards achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
adopted in 2010. The 5th National Report will be submitted in March 2014.
Output 3.4: A permanent framework for CBD reporting is established and receives
recurrent funding from government and other sources according to needs and in a
timely manner; such framework may include: institutional anchoring, the statutory
establishment of technical committees, facilities and arrangements in place for data
sourcing and monitoring, etc.
Key activity for output 3.4 is: 3.4.1 Development of NBSAP implementation monitoring mechanism
implementation framework
A permanent mechanism utilizing the current set up under the Ministry of
Natural Resources and Environment will be established to oversee the
implementation of the updated NBSAP. This mechanism will be packaged
with a dedicated focal point for NBSAP with its key role of coordinating
NBSAP implementation at the national level. Under this mechanism, a
framework NBSAP implementation including the preparation of national report
to CBD will be established and communicated to the relevant stakeholders.
This framework will also detail the systematic procedures, potential
agencies/stakeholders involved and data requirement and sourcing method.
The visibility of biodiversity will be further enhanced through various means
such as highlighting the value of biodiversity in drawing continuous support
and priorities for funding from government and other potential donors.
15
2.0 Project Management Arrangements
A Project Management Unit (PMU) comprise of the National Project Director (NPD)
for the NBSAP project will oversee and manage the overall implementation of the
NBSAP project on a daily basis including the administrative, financial and operational
duties with the assistance of the Assistant Project Coordinator (APC).
2.1 Implementing Agency
NRE is the executing agency for the NBSAP project and responsible to oversee the
overall implementation of this project. In addition, NRE will also provide the following
in-kind contribution:
Management and supervisory personnel
- Deputy Undersecretary of Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division,
NRE as the National Project Director;
- Appropriate officers to act as chairperson for the technical working
groups and counterparts to the NBSAP revision team.
Office facilities for NBSAP project team and project consultants that will be
appointed in the course of the project duration;
Access to all relevant data and information required to undertake the study;
Use of office support facilities (e.g. computers, facsimile machine, stationery,
photocopy machine, telephone, local transport), and secretarial support; and
Facilities for convening meetings, training or workshops.
2.2 National Steering Committee
A National Steering Committee (NSC) has been established to serve as the project‟s
coordination and decision-making body as well as to provide policy direction and
guidance in the implementation of the project. The NSC members consist of
representation from about 20 ministries/agencies from the Federal Government as
well as Sabah and Sarawak State agencies related to biodiversity. The Terms of
Reference of the NSC and its composition is attached in Annex I.
2.3 Project Management Unit (PMU)
The Project Management Unit or PMU is responsible to oversee the implementation of the project including the administrative and substantive aspects by ensuring all planned activities are carried out in a timely manner and meet the overall objective of the project. Members of the PMU consist of the National Project Director for the NBSAP project, relevant personnel from NRE and the UNDP CO. The PMU will also oversee the work of the TWG and where necessary, review and recommend to the NSC to endorse the findings and outputs of the TWG.
16
2.4 Technical Working Groups
Three Technical Working Groups (TWGs) will be established to provide technical and scientific input in the revision of the NPBD. The 2 Working Groups are as follows:
Working Group 1 (to be led by FRIM) on Biodiversity Assessment;
Working Group 2 (to be led by NRE) on Biodiversity Policies, Strategies and
Action plan for NBSAP and TEEB; and
Working Group 3 (to be led by EPU) on Resource Mobilisation and
Biodiversity Financing Initiative (BIOFIN).
The Term of Reference and composition for TWG 1 and 2 are attached in Annex II
and III while the TOR for TWG 3 is still under discussion.
Figure 1: NBSAP Project Management Structure
Working Group 1 (Led by FRIM) Biodiversity
Assessment
Forest
Agricultural
The Economics of Ecosystems and
Biodiversity (TEEB)
Inland Waters
Island
Marine and Coastal
Protected Areas
Invasive Alien Species
Review of NBSAP
Development Planning
Working Group 2 (Led by NRE)
Biodiversity Policies, Strategies &Action Plans
for NBSAP, and TEEB
Legislative
National Project Director Project Management Unit (PMU)
National Steering Committee
Institutional nstitutional
Development of Resource
Mobilisation plan
5th
National Report to
CBD
Working Group 3 (Led by EPU)
Resource Mobilization
and BIOFIN
BIOFIN Project
17
2.5 Project Work Plan/Schedule
The total implementation period of the project is 44 months from May 2012 to
December 2015. Table 1 below highlights the key project activities and their
implementation schedule. Annex V provides the detailed schedule and timeline for
each activity.
Table 1: NBSAP Project Implementation Schedule
Output 2012 2013 2014 2015
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1.1 Review and stocktaking of products and result from previous biodiversity planning processes at the national level are carried out in participative manner.
1.2 In response to the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans are developed in a manner that is attuned to Malaysia‟s circumstances.
1.3 The achievement of national biodiversity targets, developed in line with the global Aichi targets, is duly monitored during the project duration and beyond, and this is reported upon to the CBD through national reports and other means.
2.1 A National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) for Malaysia, anchored into national development frameworks, is updated, in a manner that is participative, widely disseminated and fully integrates new aspects of the CBD strategic plan, such as (i) mainstreaming; and (ii) the valuing of ecosystem goods and services.
18
Output 2012 2013 2014 2015
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2.2 The updated and fully endorsed NBSAP for Malaysia is submitted to the CBD preferably within the deadline set by the COP.
2.3 Strategic studies that support the update/revision of NBSAP are carried out.
3.1 National frameworks for NBSAP implementation is in place and includes (i) institutional leadership for implementation is established and strategic partnership forged (nationally and internationally); (ii) a costed and prioritized Action Plan is appended to the NBS; (iii) needs assessments on capacity, technology and finance are carried out; and (iv) a strategy for resource mobilization for the implementation of the NBSAP is produced and includes a baseline assessment of existing biodiversity finance.
3.2 CHM is enhanced to reflect all sector of biodiversity and institutionalised.
3.3 Immediate CBD reporting obligations are met by Malaysia in a timely manner: The Fifth National Report to the CBD by 31 March 2014
3.4 A permanent framework for CBD reporting is established and receives recurrent funding from government and other resources according to needs and in a timely manner; such framework may include: institutional anchoring, the statutory
19
Output 2012 2013 2014 2015
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
establishment of technical committees, facilities and arrangements in place for date sourcing and monitoring, etc.
2.6 Project Budget
Total resources required (total project funds) US$1, 320, 000 Total allocated resources (UNDP CO managed funds) US$720,000
Regular (UNDP TRAC) US$50,000
Government CS US$450,000
GEF US$220,000 Other (UNDP managed resources)
EU-UNDP US$250,000
Other (partner managed resources)
Government (cash) US$350,000 General Management Support (GMS) 6% US$27,000
3.0 Inception Phase 3.1 Project Start-up The NBSAP project was formally commenced after the signing of the project document in May 2012. The inception period was from May 2012 until February 2013. A number of activities were carried out and this include the appointment of a Project Assistant in November 2012 and the Assistant Project Coordinator on 1st January 2013 to assist in managing the project by providing necessary administrative and technical support. The earlier PMU meetings were held and discussion centred on kick-starting the project, planning for the first NPSC meeting, inception workshop, project management structure as well as the disbursement of 2012 project budget according to planned and prioritized activities, project budget and work plan.
20
3.2 First NSC Meeting
The first NSC meeting was held on 19 September 2012 and chaired by the Deputy
Undersecretary of Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, NRE.
Stakeholders were introduced to the overall project goals, outcomes and immediate
planned activities of the project based on the agreed project document and the
reporting format required by GEF. It has to be noted that the Project Document was
already finalized prior to this NSC since a few stakeholders consultations were
already conducted during the scoping exercise for this project done in 2011. The
meeting also agreed on the Terms of Reference and its membership amended
based from the stakeholders‟ comments (Annex I).
3.3 Inception Workshop
An Inception Workshop was held on 20 December 2012 in The Royale Chulan Hotel,
Kuala Lumpur with over 30 participants from federal, state agencies and NGOs. The
workshop discussed specifically on the Strategic Result Framework of the project
and project‟s work plan in an open participatory approach. The revised and updated
SRF based on inputs from the workshop is attached in Annex IV.
In addition the potential three strategic studies to be undertaken during the course of
this project were also presented. The potential strategic studies are the study on The
Economics of Ecosystem and Biodiversity (TEEB), and the Programme of Work of
Protected Areas (PoWPA) and the Ecosystem Based Adaptation (EBA). The
summary report of the NBSAP inception report is attached in Annex X.
3.4 Changes to the Strategic Result Framework and Procurement Plan
The outcomes and detailed outputs and activities of the NBSAP project as projected
in the Strategic Result Framework (SRF) was discussed in detail during the inception
workshop and among the project PMU. These changes had been endorsed by the
NSC.
Annex IV shows the revised SRF and it shall be referred to as the final SRF. The
changes made to the SRF are justified as follows:
Objective:
During the inception workshop, stakeholders agreed to include measurable
biodiversity conservation and sustainable use targets not limited but including the
following sectoral planning and development planning frameworks.
21
Three sectoral planning frameworks namely forestry, fisheries and
commodities.
Three development planning frameworks namely land use management
including spatial infrastructural development planning, development finance
and climate change mainstreaming.
Output 1.2:
Based on stakeholders response taking into account the need to have concrete
action plans for the implementation of the national biodiversity targets, output 1.2 has
been revised to include the development of national biodiversity strategies and
action plans and it now reads as:
“In response to the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, national biodiversity targets,
strategies and action plans are developed in a manner that is attuned to Malaysia‟s
circumstances.”
Output 2.3:
Three strategic studies will be carried out under the NBSAP project namely:
Local TEEB study/TEEB scoping study: assessing and capturing value in
ecosystems‟ goods and services in Malaysia;
Assessment of the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity;
and
Developing the PoWPA Action Plan by integrating key Aichi Biodiversity
Targets into national implementation of the CBD‟s Programme of Work on
Protected Areas (PoWPA).
Changes to output 3.2 include:
Adjustment to the earlier suggested strategic study on exploring and
producing the costing options to promote ecosystem-based adaptation and
resilience to climate change in Malaysia which requires mapping of species
and ecosystem distribution in scenarios of climate variability and change as
an aid to the analysis of ecosystem vulnerability and resilience. The
complexity of the study was viewed to be beyond the objective of the NBSAP
Project as it is a very technical study that requires specific scientific data. It
was agreed by the second NSC meeting that a less data intensive study to
study the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity be
undertaken.
22
On top of the three strategic studies, the study on „Mainstreaming biodiversity
into key sectors and developing opportunities for conservation and
sustainable use‟ which was originally planned as one of the strategic studies
will be internalized in the NBSAP updating process. Hence, a specific study
on biodiversity mainstreaming will not be undertaken.
Outcome 2:
The end of project target for outcome 2 on completion of the NBSAP revision had
been moved from mid 2014 to end of 2014 taking into account the current
development of the project implementation. This timeline was agreed by the second
NSC which met on 29th November 2013.
3.5 Procurement Plan
Procurement of consultancy firm(s)/individual consultant and goods and services
under this project will be done according to the existing government procurement
guidelines or UNDP procedures depending on whether procurement is done by
government counterpart or the UNDP CO as appropriate according to the decision of
the PMU. The list of potential procurement under this project and their indicative cost
is attached in Annex VI.
4.0 Challenges Ahead
The inception workshop acknowledged a number of challenges in implementing the
project. Challenges identified are listed as follows:
Limited and scattered biodiversity data that can be barrier to facilitate overall
analysis on biodiversity trends and status;
The need to address the capacity issues within the executing agency and also
at the national level and state level; and
Turnover of staffs or possible restructuring within the key government
ministries, departments or agencies during the course of the project
implementation might handicap the implementation of the project as this will
require retraining and restoration of institutional memory.
The project team will utilize the best available resources in undertaking this project
by acknowledging these challenges at the earliest stage and engaging the right
stakeholders during implementation phase.
23
5.0 References
National Policy on Biological Diversity, 1998
National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environmental Management
Inception Report, Malaysia, 2008
Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, 2010
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and Aichi Biodiversity Targets, Convention
National Steering Committee (NSC) is to meet at least once every year or any other time as the need arises. All decisions or approvals shall be reflected in the minutes of the PSC meetings. The committee may co-opt any other member, where applicable. The terms of reference of the NSC will be as follows:
Provide policy guidance to the implementation of the NBSAP Project;
Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the project towards
achievement of the project objectives and outcomes;
Review and endorse annual work plan and budget;
Review and endorse remedial actions to overcome all constraints in
progress of the projects;
Review and approve relevant changes in the project outputs and
associated activities, where applicable and necessary; and
Review and endorse all action or implementation plans, publications
including technical reports produced by the projects.
25
MEMBERSHIP FOR NATIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE
UNDP-GEF “NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY PLANNING TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CBD 2011 – 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IN MALAYSIA”
(NBSAP)
Organisation Role
1. Secretary General Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE)
Chairperson
2. Undersecretary Biodiversity and Forest Management Division, NRE
Secretariat
3. Science Advisor to Prime Minister Member
4.
Director Environment and Natural Resource Economics Section, Economic Planning Unit (EPU)
Member
5. Deputy Director International Cooperation Section, Economic Planning Unit
Member
6. Ministry of Finance (MOF) Member
7. Environmental Management and Climate Change Division, NRE
Member
8. Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industries (MOA) Member
9. Ministry of Plantations Industries and Commodities (MPIC) Member
10. Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water (MEGTW) Member
11. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) Member
12. Ministry of International Trade and Industries (MITI) Member
13. Town and Country Planning Department, Ministry of Housing and Local Government (TCPD)
Member
14. Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) Member
15. Natural Resource Office, Sabah Member
16. Ministry of Tourism, Cultural and Environment, Sabah Member
17. Ministry of Resource Planning and Environment, Sarawak Member
18. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Member
19. Malaysian Nature Society Member
20. WWF Malaysia Member
21. Third World Network (TWN) Member
26
ANNEX II
TERMS OF REFERENCE
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP 1: BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT
The terms of reference of the TWG 1 are as follows:
To advise on the national biodiversity assessment and stocktaking exercise;
To facilitate data and information gathering from the federal and state agencies;
To provide technical input and guidance for the preparation of a stocktaking and assessment report;
To guide drafting and submission of the report on biodiversity assessment to be incorporated into part 1 of the 5th national report to CBD on „an update on biodiversity status, trends, and threats and implications for human well being‟; and
To report findings and progress to the PMU and NSC Members:
i. Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) – Chair ii. Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, NRE iii. Environmental Management and Climate Change Division, NRE iv. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia v. Department of Agriculture Peninsular, Sabah, vi. State Planning Unit, Sarawak vii. Forest Department, Sarawak viii. Department of Agriculture, Sarawak ix. Sarawak Forestry Corporation (SFC) x. Fisheries Department, Sarawak xi. Sabah Forestry Department xii. Department of Wildlife and National Park xiii. Sabah Wildlife Department xiv. Department of Marine Parks Malaysia xv. Maritime Institute of Malaysia xvi. Sabah Parks xvii. National Oceanography Directorate, MOSTI xviii. Department of Fisheries xix. Fisheries Department, Sabah xx. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) xxi. and other relevant institution/thematic expert
The committee may co-opt any other members such as from states departments and agencies, where relevant.
27
ANNEX III
TERMS OF REFERENCE
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP 2: BIODIVERSITY POLICIES, STRATEGIES & ACTION PLANS FOR NBSAP AND TEEB
The terms of reference of the TWG 2 are as follows:
To provide input and guidance in preparing the updated NBSAP and the development of national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans consistent with Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets;
To provide input and guidance in preparing the TEEB;
To guide drafting and submission of the report for Parts 2 and 3 of the 5th national report to CBD on „The national biodiversity strategy and action plan (NBSAP), its implementation, and the mainstreaming of biodiversity‟
To consolidate the final draft of the 5th National Report;
To report findings and progress to the PMU and NSC
Members:
i. Undersecretary, Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, NRE ii. Ministry of Finance (MOF) iii. Environmental Management and Climate Change Division, NRE iv. Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia v. Sabah Forestry Department vi. State Planning Unit, Sarawak vii. Forest Department, Sarawak viii. Sarawak Forestry Corporation (SFC) ix. Department of Wildlife and National Park x. Forest Research Institute Malaysia xi. Sabah Wildlife Department xii. Department of Marine Park Malaysia xiii. Maritime Institute of Malaysia xiv. Sabah Parks xv. National Oceanography Directorate, MOSTI xvi. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry xvii. States Economic Planning Unit xviii. Fisheries Department, Sabah xix. Fisheries Department, Sarawak
The committee may co-opt any other members such as from states departments and agencies, where relevant.
28
Annex IV
Revised Strategic Result Framework
(Based on comments received from the inception workshop, Project Management Unit and NSC)
Objective/ Outcome Indicator Baseline End of Project
target
Source of
Information
Risks and
assumptions
Objective – To integrate
Malaysia’s obligations under the
Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) into its national
development and sectoral planning
frameworks through a renewed and
participative ‘biodiversity
planning’ and strategizing process,
aligning the results of the process
to the global guidance contained in the SPB.
The inclusion of measurable biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use targets into
the following sectoral planning frameworks,
where applicable:
Agriculture
Fores ry
Tourism, Trade, Travel and Transport
Energy
Fishery
Commodities
Oi and Gas
Development Planning & F nance
Water
Measurable
biodiversity
conservation and
sustainable use
targets are not
defined in the
agriculture, forestry,
tourism, trade, travel
and transport, energy,
fishery, commodities, oil and gas,
development
planning & finance
and water sectors.
By 2014, national
targets have been
defined for measuring
the integration of
biodiversity
conservation
and sustainable use
for terrestrial and
marine ecosystems
such as forestry, fisheries and
agriculture sectors
and these targets are
included in the
national planning
frameworks of the
sectors, where
applicable.
Approved
NBSAP
Annual budgets
and work plans
11th Malaysia
Plan (2016-
2020)
Competing priorities
between and
amongst line
ministries and
agencies limits the
endorsement of
national biodiversity
targets.
Economic downturn
in Malaysia does not hinder biodiversity
conservation as a
priority of the
Malaysian
government.
All relevant
stakeholders will
agree and endorse
the national
biodiversity targets.
Effective cooperation from
relevant agencies
and departments.
Private sector,
understands
requirement for, and
benefits of,
biodiversity
The inclusion of measurable biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use targets into
the following development frameworks,
where applicable:
Land-use management, including spatial and
infrastructu al develo ment planning
Development finance
Poverty all viation
Food security
Climate change mainstreaming
Population & urban planning
No targets to measure
the integration of
biodiversity and
sustainable
development into the main development
frameworks of
Malaysia
By 2015, selected
development
sectors/areas
considers biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use in
their
development
decisions
Approved
NBSAP
Annual budgets
and work plans
11th Malaysia
Plan (2016-
2020)
Land Use Plans
29
Objective/ Outcome Indicator Baseline End of Project
target
Source of
Information
Risks and
assumptions
conservation and
sustainable use.
Outcome 1 – A participative
stocktaking exercise on
biodiversity planning takes place
and national biodiversity targets are developed in response to the
global Aichi Targets
Output 1.1 Review and stocktaking of products and results from previous biodiversity planning processes at the national level are carried
out in participative manner.
Output 1.2 In response to the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans are developed in a
manner that is attuned to Malaysia’s circumstances.
Output 1.3 The achievement of national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans developed in line with the global Aichi Targets, is
duly monitored during the project duration and beyond, and this is reported upon to the CBD through national reports and other
means.
Effective establishment of a multi-
sectoral/multi-stakeholder working group or
Committee
Working group
/committee is
established on a need
basis
By first quarter of
2013, a multi-
sectoral/multi-
stakeholder working group/committee is
established and it
completes the stock-
taking exercise.
Project reports
CBD National
Reports
Government
recognises need and
prepared to adopt
realistic national biodiversity targets.
All relevant
stakeholders will
agree and endorse
the national
biodiversity targets.
Effective
cooperation from
relevant agencies
and departments.
Development of national biodiversity targets
in response to the global Aichi Targets
No national targets
have been developed
By 2014, national
targets in response to
the global Aichi
Targets are
developed.
Project reports
CBD National
Reports
Official gazette
(e.g. on PA
establishment)
Outcome 2 – The NBSAP is
revised/updated and it fully
integrates new aspects of the CBD strategic plan, such as
mainstreaming and anchoring the
implementation of the plan into
national development frameworks,
valuing ecosystem services
Output 2.1 A National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) for Malaysia, anchored into national development frameworks, is
updated, in a manner that is participative, widely disseminated and integrates new aspects of the SPB, such as: (i)
mainstreaming; and (ii) the valuing of ecosystem goods and services;
Output 2.2 The updated and fully endorsed NBSAPs for Malaysia is submitted to the CBD preferably within the deadline set by the COP.
Output 2.3 Strategic studies that support the update/revision of NBSAP are carried out. The studies include:
Local TEEB study/TEEB scoping study: assessing and capturing value in ecosystems’ goods and services in
Malaysia
Mainstreaming biodiversity into key sectors and developing opportunities for conservation and sustainable use
30
Objective/ Outcome Indicator Baseline End of Project
target
Source of
Information
Risks and
assumptions
Assessment of the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity
Developing the PoWPA Action Plan by integrating key Aichi Biodiversity Targets into national implementation of
the CBD’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas (PoWPA)
Status of NBSAP vis-à-vis the guidance in
the CBD Strategic Plan (2011-2020)
NBSAP is out of date
and does not consider
newer guidance
By end of 2014, the
Malaysia’s NBSAP is
fully updated, it is in
line with the
guidance in the CBD
Strategic Plan (2011-
2020) and has been
submitted to the CBD
COP
CBD Website. Government
recognises need and
prepared to adopt a
realistic plan.
All relevant
stakeholders will
agree and endorse
the updated NBSAP.
Outcome 3 – National frameworks
for resource mobilisation,
Convention reporting and exchange mechanisms are
established and strengthened
Output 3.1 National frameworks for NBSAP implementation is in place and includes: (i) institutional leadership for implementation is
established and strategic partnerships forged (nationally and internationally); (ii) a costed and prioritized Action Plan is
appended to the NBS; (iii) needs assessments on capacity, technology and finance are carried out; and (iv) a strategy for resource mobilization for the implementation of the NBSAP is produced and includes a baseline assessment of existing biodiversity
finance.
Output 3.2 CHM is enhanced to reflect all sector of biodiversity and institutionalised.
Output 3.3 Immediate CBD reporting obligations are met by Malaysia in a timely manner: The Fifth National Report to the CBD by 31
March 2014.
Output 3.4 A permanent framework for CBD reporting is established and receives recurrent funding from government and other sources according to needs and in a timely manner; such framework may include: institutional anchoring, the statutory establishment of
technical committees, facilities and arrangements in place for date sourcing and monitoring, etc.
Status of the national clearing house
mechanisms (CHM)
CHM is maintained
and updated but not
linked up to other
regional/global
information and
knowledge exchange
network.
By 2013, the national
CHM is kept up-to-
date and improved
CBD Website
CHM national
site(s)
Existing datasets are
made available to the
project and sufficient
capacity to compile
and integrate
datasets.
Identified funding
mechanisms are feasible and there is
a government
commitment to
Status of the capacity, technology and
financial frameworks for implementing the
revised NBSAP
No framework exists By 2015, a complete
plan for
implementing the NBSAP, including
Project APR/PIR
31
Objective/ Outcome Indicator Baseline End of Project
target
Source of
Information
Risks and
assumptions
capacity, technology
and finance needs
assessment, has been
produced and
underpins NBSAP
implementation
allocate manpower
and capacity.
32
Annex V
Revised Project Schedule
OUTCOME OUTPUT ACTIVITIES 2012 2013 2014 2015
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
1 1.1 Review and stocktaking of products and result from previous biodiversity planning processes at the national level are carried out in participative manner.
1.1.1 Rapid stocktaking and review of relevant plans, policies and reports.
X X
1.1.2 Identification of stakeholders; consultations and awareness.
X X X X X X X X X X X
1.1.3 Rapid assessment of the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss highlighting the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their contribution to human well-being.
X X
1.2 In response to the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans are developed in a manner that is attuned to Malaysia‟s circumstances.
1.2.1 Setting national biodiversity targets, principles, and main priorities of the strategy though national and sub-national consultations.
X X X
1.3 The achievement of national biodiversity targets, developed in line with the global Aichi targets, is duly monitored during the project duration and beyond, and this is reported upon to the CBD through national reports and other means.
1.3.1 Putting in place implementation and monitoring mechanism for the updated NBSAP.
X X
2 2.1 A National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) for Malaysia, anchored into national development frameworks, is updated,
2.1.1 Develop the strategy and actions to implement the agreed targets though national and sub-national
X X X
33
OUTCOME OUTPUT ACTIVITIES 2012 2013 2014 2015
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
in a manner that is participative, widely disseminated and fully integrates new aspects of the CBD strategic plan, such as (i) mainstreaming; and (ii) the valuing of ecosystem goods and services.
consultations.
2.1.2 Development of specific action plans for terrestrial and marine ecosystems such as forestry, fisheries and agriculture sectors through consultations.
X X X
2.1.3 In an iterative manner, Malaysia taps into useful information on, and participative into, global networks and initiatives on biodiversity data and indicators (such as biodiversity Indicators Partnership, Global Biodiversity Information Facility and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, the Global Environment Outlook portal, among other relevant ones).
X X X X X X X X X X
2.2 The updated and fully endorsed NBSAP for Malaysia is submitted to the CBD preferably within the deadline set by the COP.
2.2.1 Submit updated NBSAP to National Biodiversity Council and Cabinet for approval; and subsequently to CBD Secretariat.
X X X
2.3 Strategic studies that support the update/revision of NBSAP are carried out.
2.3.1 Complete the studies on (i) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Malaysia, (ii) Development of an updated PoWPA Action Plan to achieve Aichi Targets. (iii) A study to assess the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity
X X X X X X
34
OUTCOME OUTPUT ACTIVITIES 2012 2013 2014 2015
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
3 3.1 National frameworks for NBSAP implementation is in place and includes (i) institutional leadership for implementation is established and strategic partnership forged (nationally and internationally); (ii) a costed and prioritized Action Plan is appended to the NBS; (iii) needs assessments on capacity, technology and finance are carried out; and (iv) a strategy for resource mobilization for the implementation of the NBSAP is produced and includes a baseline assessment of existing biodiversity finance.
3.1.1 Capacity need assessment and development of a plan for capacity development for NBSAP implementation.
X X X
3.1.2 Development of a communication and outreach strategy for the NBSAP and awareness on biodiversity, and implementation of outreach activities to disseminate NBSAP.
X X X
3.2 CHM is enhanced to reflect all sector of biodiversity and institutionalised.
3.2.1 CHM upgrading/enhancement. X X X X X X X X
3.3 Immediate CBD reporting obligations are met by Malaysia in a timely manner: The Fifth National Report to the CBD by 31 March 2014.
3.3.1 Preparation and submission of the Fifth National Report to CBD.
X X X
3.4 A permanent framework for CBD reporting is established and receives recurrent funding from government and other resources according to needs and in a timely manner; such framework may include: institutional anchoring, the statutory establishment of technical committees, facilities and arrangements in place for date sourcing and monitoring, etc.
3.4.1 Development of NBSAP implementation monitoring mechanism and implementation framework
X X
35
Annex VI PROCUREMENT PLAN
The indicative procurement plan is based on the planned activities and estimated budget for project duration
Description of goods, services or works
Unit of Measur
e
Quantity
Estimated Unit
Price in USD
Estimated Total Price
in USD
Method of Procureme
nt
Start of Activity
Completion of Activity
Responsible authorities
5th National Report (procurement of
consultancy services) Months 12 1,916
23,000
Individual Contract
7 May 2013
6 May 2014 NRE and UNDP
NBSAP (procurement of consultancy services and reimbursement)
Months 12 19,445 233, 334
Company
March 2014
March 2015 NRE and UNDP
Strategic Study 1 : The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) Scoping Exercise - (procurement of consultancy services)
Months 12 8,334 100,000 Company May 2014
May 2015
NRE and department under NRE and UNDP
Strategic Study 2: The Assessment of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystems(procurement of consultancy services)
Months 12 8,334 100,000 Company April 2014
April 2015 NRE, FRIM, NAHRIM and UNDP
Strategic Study 3: Development of Plan of Work for Protected Areas (PoWPA)– (consultation meetings and workshops)
Months 7 NA 15,000 In-house April 2014
Oct 2014
NRE, JPSM, DWNP, JTLM and UNDP, PA Networks
Training, Workshop, Consultation and Seminars
70,000
January 2014
October 2015
NRE and UNDP
Project Management
70,000 January
2013 December
2015 NRE and UNDP
Travel – local and to attend international meetings
45,000
January 2014
October 2015
NRE and UNDP
Publication and promotional activities
50,000 Company
January 2014
October 2015
NRE and UNDP
36
Annex VII
Terms of Reference
Revision of National Policy on Biological Diversity, Development of National Biodiversity Targets, Strategies and Action Plans
A. Project Title: National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Malaysia (NBSAP Malaysia) Country : Malaysia Duty Station : Putrajaya and home-based Duration : March 2014 – March 2015 GEF Agency : United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Executing Partner : Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE)
B. Project Description
Malaysia is a signatory member to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The new CBD Strategic Plan 2011 – 2020, adopted at 10th Conference of Parties in 2010 in Nagoya, clearly addresses the need for updating National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAP), stating in Target 17 that “By 2015, each Party has developed, adopted as a policy instrument, and has commenced implementing an effective, participatory and updated national biodiversity strategy and action plan”. The NBSAP or known as National Policy on Biological Diversity in Malaysia was formulated in 1998 and has not been updated since. The current policy does not include elements such as well-defined roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders, national biodiversity targets and resource mobilisation strategy to implement the policy and action plans at national and state level. The Government of Malaysia is currently implementing a biodiversity enabling activities project titled „National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Malaysia (NBSAP Malaysia), with the support from UNDP and grant financing from Global Environment Facility (GEF). Outcomes of this project are:
Outcome 1: A participative stocktaking exercise on biodiversity planning takes place and national biodiversity targets are developed in response to the global Aichi Targets;
Outcome 2: The NBSAP is revised/updated and it fully integrates new aspects of the CBD strategic plan, such as mainstreaming and anchoring the implementation of the plan into national development frameworks, valuing
37
ecosystem services and promoting ecosystem-based adaptation and resilience;
Outcome 3: National frameworks for resource mobilisation, Convention reporting and exchange mechanisms are established and strengthened.
The Project Document can be downloaded from the following web link: http://www.nre.gov.my/Malay/Documents/PengumumanNRE/Project%20Document%20NBSAP.pdf or http://www.undp.org.my/page.php?pid=204&menu=sub&title=Environment_and_Energy.
C. Scope of Services, Expected Deliverables and Deadlines
The scope of services and major activities are carried out in three main components that correspond to the NBSAP project outcomes:
1. Stocktaking Exercise and Gap Analysis - Assessment of Biological Diversity in Malaysia
Conduct rapid biodiversity assessment;
Conduct gap analysis on the current National Policy of Biological Diversity and synergies with other policies in national development and key economic sectors;
Review and stocktaking of decisions and literature that are relevant to the development of national biodiversity targets and revision of the National Policy of Biological Diversity; and
Prepare material, present findings and facilitate stakeholder discussions during consultations and meetings/workshops/conference.
2. Revision of National Policy on Biological Diversity and its linkage to Aichi
Biodiversity Targets
Prepare the outline of the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity based on the results of stocktaking exercise and gap analysis;
Identify potential national biodiversity targets and indicators that are aligned with the National Policy on Biological Diversity;
Update, draft and finalise National Policy on Biological Diversity with measurable national biodiversity targets, clear description of roles and responsibilities of relevant government agencies with timelines and indicators; that incorporates new aspects of the CBD Strategic Plan 2011 - 2020, values of ecosystem goods and services and new & emerging issues;
Develop Malaysia‟s response towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and their links to the revised the National Policy of Biological Diversity; and
Prepare material, present findings and facilitate stakeholder discussions during consultations and meetings/workshops/conference.
3. Development of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans
Revise and develop strategies and action plans for the implementation of the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity
Action plans should include activities and timelines, responsible implementing agencies and estimated budget requirements;
Conduct capacity and technology needs assessment for the implementation of revised National Policy on Biological Diversity;
Prepare material, present findings and facilitate stakeholder discussions during consultations and meetings/workshops/conference; and
Document the process of revising National Policy on Biological Diversity and development of national biodiversity targets, strategies and action plans, including stakeholder plan, methodology, descriptions of data, resources, assumptions and decisions, complete references for data and information, and responses to comments of stakeholders.
Expected deliverables and deadlines are in the table below.
Components Expected Deliverables Deadlines
1. Stocktaking Exercise and Gap Analysis -
Assessment of Biological Diversity in Malaysia
1.1 Detailed work plan including methodology, agreed allocation of tasks amongst team members, deliverables and milestones, and travel plans
10 days after signing of Letter of Acceptance (LoA)
1.2 Draft report on stocktaking exercise and gap analysis - Assessment of Biological Diversity in Malaysia
By 1 April 2014
1.3 Final report on stocktaking exercise and gap analysis- Assessment of Biological Diversity in Malaysia
By 15 April 2014
2. Revision of National Policy on Biological Diversity and its linkage to Aichi Biodiversity Targets
2.1 Outline of revised National Policy of Biological Diversity
By 30 April 2014
2.2 Draft revised National Policy of Biological Diversity
By 30 June 2014
2.3 Draft of Malaysia‟s targets in response to Aichi Biodiversity Targets
By 30 June 2014
2.4 Final revised National Policy of Biological Diversity (edited and proof-read)
By 29 August 2014
2.5 Final National Biodiversity Targets in response to Aichi Biodiversity Targets
By 29 August 2014
3. Development of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans
3.1 Draft revised and updated national biodiversity strategies and action plan
By 2 May 2014
3.2 Final national biodiversity strategies and action plan (edited and proof-read)
By 29 August 2014
3.3 Draft report on capacity and technology needs assessment
By 15 September 2014
39
Components Expected Deliverables Deadlines
3.4 Final report on capacity and technology needs assessment (edited and proof-read)
By 31 December 2014
3.5 NBSAP Final reports By 31 December 2014
D. Methodology, Data and Information The consultancy will be conducted in a participatory and inclusive manner through a combination of processes. It is anticipated that the following general approach and specific methodology will be used for the consultancy. General Approach:
1. Desktop review of documentation and literature including relevant policies and actions plans (environment and development), legislations, financial reports, Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP CBD) decisions, scientific reports and other relevant documents.
2. Data collection and assessment
Gather and assess relevant data and information on biodiversity status and trends (such as biodiversity hotspots, forest cover, protected areas, important flora and fauna areas, endangered species, etc.), society and biodiversity, status of public awareness and knowledge gaps from stakeholders engagement which include interviews, meetings etc.
Prepare and produce relevant maps/figures for the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity.
3. Site visits and interviews in the field with stakeholders shall include:
Relevant Federal Government agencies
State Governments
Relevant Research institutions and universities
Relevant Civil society and non-governmental organisations
Private sector
Specific Methodology:
1. Revision of National Policy on Biological Diversity The revision process should be carried out in line with the guidelines for
NBSAP development prepared by CBD. These practical guides are available at http://www.cbd.int/nbsap/training/.
2. Development of Malaysia‟s response towards the CBD Strategic Plan for
Biodiversity 2011-2020 and Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
The timelines for the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity may exceed 2020 however Malaysia‟s response to the CBD Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and Aichi Biodiversity Targets should be targeted for 2020.
In addition, the consultancy work has to be conducted in close cooperation with past and currently on-going programmes and projects relevant to NBSAP. The list includes but not limited to:
Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) and Resource Mobilisation Study;
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Malaysia Country Study;
Payment for Ecosystem Services Scoping Study implemented by EPU and supported by UNDP;
REDD+ Readiness project implemented by NRE and supported by UNDP
Enhancing Effectiveness and Financial Sustainability for Protected Areas in Malaysia (PA Financing) project implemented by Department of Wildlife and National Parks, supported by UNDP and financed by GEF; and
Improving Connectivity in the Central Forest Spine Landscape (IC-CFS) project implemented by Department of Forestry Peninsular Malaysia, supported by UNDP and financed by GEF.
All data and information, methodologies, analysis results and reports must be made available and handed over in hardcopies and softcopies to NRE and UNDP at the end of the contract.
E. Institutional Arrangement The team will report to the National Project Director. The team is expected to work closely with the three NBSAP Technical Working Groups, namely (i) Biodiversity Assessment and (ii) NBSAP and TEEB (iii) BIOFIN and Resource Mobilisation for technical inputs and guidance. All deliverables must be submitted to the NBSAP project team at the Biodiversity and Forest Management Division, NRE and UNDP for review and approval by the National Steering Committee established under the NBSAP Malaysia project. The project will not provide equipment and supplies for the delivery of outputs.
F. Duration of the Work
The consultancy is expected to take place from March 2014 to March 2015. The total duration of work from the whole team is up to 24 man-months including 2 man-month missions to Sabah, Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia.
41
The team should comprise of the following experts:
No. Member Key Tasks Estimated Duration
(man-month)
1 Team Leader Coordinate, manage and monitor the implementation of all aspects of the consultancy work
Elaborate and revise the detailed work plan
Supervise the work of consultants to ensure that outputs are delivered on time, within budget, and to appropriate high quality standards of deliverables
Prepare the capacity and technology needs assessment report
Prepare the final NBSAP report
6
2 Biodiversity Policy Expert
Lead in the Component 2: Revision of National Policy on Biological Diversity
Prepare the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity
Provide technical support to Components 1, 2 and 3
7
3 Social Scientist
Facilitate stakeholder consultations
Provide technical inputs on gender mainstreaming, indigenous and local communities and Communication, Education and Public Awareness (CEPA) to Components 1, 2 and 3
3
4 Terrestrial Biodiversity Technical Officer
Provide technical inputs to Components 1, 2 and 3 particularly on terrestrial biodiversity status and trends.
Prepare and produce relevant maps/figures for the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity
4
5 Marine Biodiversity Technical Officer
Provide technical inputs to Components 1, 2 and 3 particularly on marine biodiversity status and trends.
Prepare and produce relevant maps/figures for the revised National Policy on Biological Diversity
4
Total 24
42
G. Location of Work
Duty Station: Putrajaya, Malaysia and home-based. The consultants are expected to travel to Sabah, Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia for stakeholder consultation meetings/workshops. H. Qualifications of the Successful Service Providers at Various Levels The consultancy team shall have a team leader and will comprise of different expertise, as proposed below for the successful delivery of services. The team should have a minimum of 5 members consisting of experts in biodiversity policy, terrestrial and marine biodiversity, communication and public awareness, sociology and capacity development.
1. Team Leader
Advanced postgraduate degree in biodiversity conservation and management, environmental management, environmental science, natural resource management or relevant qualifications, or equivalent work experience.
At least 5 years of experience in project management.
At least 10 years of professional experience in the development of environment and biodiversity related policy, strategies and action plans, and/or programmes and projects.
Experience in mainstreaming environment and biodiversity into development planning process. Knowledge in policy, legal and institutional environment of Malaysia would be an advantage.
Experience in capacity development and stakeholder consultation.
Excellent command of English and Bahasa Malaysia.
Strong analytical, writing and communication skills.
Ability to prepare publications and reports.
Ability to manage and work with a multidisciplinary and multicultural team.
2. Biodiversity Policy Expert
Advanced postgraduate degree in public policy, environmental law or relevant qualifications, or equivalent work experience.
At least 5 years of professional experience in the formulation of environment and biodiversity related policy, strategies and action plans.
Sound knowledge of environment/biodiversity policy and legislation in Malaysia.
Technical knowledge of public sector institutional set up in Malaysia.
Strong analytical, writing and communication skills.
Ability to prepare publications and reports.
Excellent command of English and Bahasa Malaysia.
43
3. Social Scientist
A postgraduate degree in social science, sociology, development studies or other relevant qualification.
Minimum of 5 years of experience in socio-economics development projects.
Experience in the development of Communication, Education and/or Public Awareness strategy or action plan.
Experience in stakeholder consultations.
Knowledge of gender mainstreaming in environmental/biodiversity policy and strategies.
Strong analytical, writing and communication skills.
Excellent command of English and Bahasa Malaysia.
4. Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity Technical Officers
A degree in biodiversity conservation and management, ecology, environmental studies, natural resource management or other relevant qualifications.
At least 3 years of experience in biodiversity related projects.
Knowledge in biodiversity, ecosystems and protected areas in Malaysia.
Knowledge in GIS and modelling.
Strong analytical, writing and communication skills.
Excellent command of English and Bahasa Malaysia.
I. Cost
The funding allocated for this study is up to a maximum of RM700,000 including service tax. The schedule of payments to the consultant is described in section J.
J. Schedule of Payments
The consultancy shall be paid, upon satisfactory delivery and acceptance of the
deliverables by NRE and UNDP according to the following schedule:
Milestone Percentage
1. Submission and approval of detailed work plan including methodology, agreed allocation of tasks amongst team members, deliverables and milestones, and travel plan
10%
2.Submission and approval of: (a) Final report on stocktaking exercise and gap analysis-
Assessment of Biological Diversity in Malaysia (b) Outline of the revised National Policy of Biological Diversity (c) Submission and approval of Draft revised National Policy of
Biological Diversity (d) Draft of Malaysia‟s targets in response to Aichi Biodiversity
Targets (e) Draft revised and updated national biodiversity strategies
and action plan
30%
44
Milestone Percentage
3.Submission and approval of:
(a) Final revised National Policy of Biological Diversity (edited and proof-read)
(b) Final National Biodiversity Targets in response to Aichi Biodiversity Targets
(c) Final national biodiversity strategies and action plan (edited and proof-read)
(d) Draft report on capacity and technology needs assessment
30%
4.Submission and approval of: (a) Final report on capacity and technology needs assessment (b) Submission and approval of NBSAP final reports
30%
45
ANNEX VIII
TERMS OF REFERENCE
CONSULTANCY SERVICES
STRATEGIC STUDY ON THE ECONOMIC OF ECOSYSTEMS AND
BIODIVERSITY (TEEB) MALAYSIA INTRODUCTION
Malaysia, one of the mega-biodiversity countries in the world, is a party to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) since 1994. Malaysia had benefitted from the utilising of rich biodiversity and natural resources in its economic and social development. At the same time, Malaysia is taking a balance approach in the management of biodiversity and ecosystem services to ensure that these services are utilized in a sustainable manner. As a CBD country party and joining the global efforts to implement the CBD Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets, Malaysia is now in the process of updating its National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP), or known as the National Policy on Biological Diversity 1998. This project titled “National biodiversity planning to support the implementation of the CBD 2011 – 2020 strategic plan in Malaysia” is supported by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) under its Biodiversity Enabling Activities project and by United Nations Development Programme. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) is the implementing agency for this project. This project seeks to integrate Malaysia‟s obligations under the CBD into its national development and sectoral planning frameworks through a renewed and participative biodiversity planning and strategizing process, in a manner that is in line with the global guidance in the CBD‟s Strategic Plan for 2011 – 2020. One of the key outputs under the Project is to conduct a strategic study on The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) for Malaysia. This TEEB strategic study will allow Malaysia to demonstrate the benefits and values of ecosystems and biodiversity at the national level, and identify the process of integrating biodiversity into sectoral and national development planning through concrete biodiversity valuation examples. SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this exercise is to synthesise the methods, information and lessons learned from past studies and research in the application of economic valuation methods and tools to mainstream the value of ecosystems and biodiversity into decision making, planning and development processes.
46
Specifically, the exercise aims to:
gather and review existing and updated information on studies and research on the value of ecosystems and biodiversity in Malaysia;
identify critical biodiversity and ecosystems services in Malaysia and propose key critical ecosystem services and proposed suitable methodologies for the implementation of full TEEB study;
study selected sectors and sites which have conducted full economic studies and scenarios development (case studies) in Malaysia including examples from other countries, where applicable,
recommend the objectives (policy context), thematic focus and methodologies/tools for TEEB Malaysia (National TEEB); and
identify stakeholders/ beneficiaries that will be impacted by the TEEB Malaysia.
METHODOLOGY
The methodology includes desk research, interviews and meetings/discussions and consultation with relevant stakeholders.
EXPECTED OUTPUTS
The consultant is expected to produce: a) Synopsis and analysis of valuation studies on biodiversity and ecosystem
services conducted in Malaysia as well as other countries‟ experience on TEEB
as background information;
b) Scoping Report for TEEB Malaysia structured along the outline as indicated in Annex 1, as appropriate. The output of the study shall have a section that
answers the following questions:
Q1: What are the status and trends of ecosystems in Malaysia and the services they provide to society?
Q2: What are the drivers causing changes in the ecosystems and their services in Malaysia?
Q3: How do ecosystem services affect human well-being, who and where are the beneficiaries, and how does this affect how they are valued and managed?
Q4: Why should we incorporate the economic values of ecosystem services into decision making?
Q5 : What are the potential methodologies and tools to mainstream these values into policy and decision making?
Q6: How can we secure and improve the continued delivery of biodiversity and ecosystem services?
A detailed record of consultations with stakeholders will need to be produced and provided, as an annex to the main report.
47
c) TEEB case studies Specific TEEB case studies on Central Forest Spine, Royal Belum State Park and TEEB for water resource management in Belum Temenggor Forest. Reserve.
DURATION
The project will take place from 1 May 2014 till 1 May 2015. The expected number of working days is 6 man-month. DELIVERABLES AND TIMELINE The consultants will report to the Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE). The consultant responsible for submitting the following deliverables to the Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, NRE:
Deliverables Timeline
Synopsis of valuation studies on biodiversity and ecosystem services conducted in Malaysia including the mainstreaming of valuation into sectoral plans, as well as other countries‟ experience on TEEB as background information
By 1 June 2014
Review and analysis of economic valuation studies and other best practices and lessons learned presented in summary tables
By 1 June 2014
Draft Scoping Report for TEEB Malaysia including profile of key critical biodiversity and ecosystems services in Malaysia
By 15 September 2014
Draft TEEB Case Studies report By 31 January 2014
Final Scoping Report for TEEB Malaysia and final TEEB case studies report including presentation materials
By 1 May 2014
TERMS OF PAYMENT The fee is payable upon satisfactory completion of the deliverables. For payment in installments, certification of satisfactory performance at each phase by NRE is required.
Phase Percentage
Submission of work plan 10%
Submission and acceptance of Synopsis and analysis of valuation studies on biodiversity and ecosystem services
20%
Submission and acceptance of TEEB Strategic Study outline report
30%
Submission and approval of final draft of TEEB Strategic Study Report
40%
48
COMPETENCIES Functional competencies:
Extensive knowledge in biodiversity and ecosystems management in Malaysia;
Sound analytical and organisational skills; Excellent communication and writing skills.
Corporate Competencies:
Displays cultural, gender, religion, race, nationality and age sensitivity and adaptability
Treats all people fairly without favouritism; Fulfils all obligations to gender sensitivity and zero tolerance for sexual
harassment.
DURATION AND TEAM COMPOSITION
The consultancy will take place from 1 May 2014 to 1 May 2015. The total number of
man-months from the team is not more than 24 months including missions to Sabah,
Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia.
Duty Station: Putrajaya, Malaysia and home-based.
The team should comprise of the following experts:
No. Member Key Tasks Estimated Duration
(man-month) 1 Senior
Environmental Economist
Coordinate the technical implementation of the TEEB study
Conduct analyses on valuation studies on biodiversity and ecosystem services
Analyse market and environmental trends
Assess the costs and benefits of various activities, policies, or regulations that affect biodiversity or natural resource stocks.
Prepare presentations to communicate study results, to present policy recommendations and to raise awareness of environmental consequences.
Facilitate stakeholder consultations
6
49
No. Member Key Tasks Estimated Duration
(man-month) 2 Biodiversity and
Ecosystems Technical Expert/Specialist
Provide technical and scientific advice and assistance regarding biodiversity and ecosystems
6
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE SUCCESSFUL SERVICE PROVIDERS AT VARIOUS LEVELS
The consultancy team shall comprise of a senior environmental economist and biodiversity and ecosystems technical expert/specialist. 1. Senior Environmental Economist
advanced postgraduate degree in Environmental Economics, Natural Resource Economics, Environmental Finance or related fields;
minimum of 5 years extensive working experience in environmental economics, social economics, natural resources economics or natural resources management;
demonstrated working experience in the use of tools for cost-benefit analysis, economic valuations, natural resource accounting or scenario planning for ecosystems or natural resources;
Knowledge of conservation finance mechanisms such as PES and other innovative financial mechanisms is an asset;
Familiarity with environmental economic modelling tools, including econometrics, statistics, quantitative and qualitative analysis, economic analysis, dynamic models, etc.
good understanding of biodiversity and ecosystems in Malaysia
Strong analytical, writing and communication skills.
Ability to prepare publications and reports.
Excellent command of English and Bahasa Malaysia. 2. Biodiversity and Ecosystems Technical Expert/Specialist
Advanced postgraduate degree in biodiversity conservation and management, ecology, environmental studies, natural resource management or other relevant qualifications.
At least 3 years of experience in biodiversity and ecosystems related projects.
Knowledge in biodiversity, ecosystems, protected areas and water resources in Malaysia.
Strong analytical, writing and communication skills.
Excellent command of English and Bahasa Malaysia.
50
DOCUMENTS TO BE INCLUDED WHEN SUBMITTING THE PROPOSALS
Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications: 2. Personal CV including areas of expertise and past experience in similar projects
and at least three (3) references;
3. Financial Proposal should specify a total lump sum amount.
51
ANNEX 1 INDICATIVE OUTLINEOF THE STRATEGIC STUDY FOR TEEB MALAYSIA
i. Executive Summary
ii. Acronyms and Abbreviations
1. Introduction
Purpose of the strategic exercise
Scope and methodology
Structure of the report
2. Synthesis of Existing Information related to TEEB
Key biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services in Malaysia
Past initiatives and studies on values of ecosystem services or natural
assets in Malaysia
Key on-going initiatives
3. Recommendations for TEEB Malaysia Country Study
An understanding of the policy context within which the country study
covers
Key thematic areas on which the study will focus
Draft objective or set of objectives for the study
Set of key questions which the study will aim to answer
Proposed methodology and/or tools
A list of outputs to be delivered by the study
Proposed format for the outputs
A list of target stakeholders
4. TEEB case study
Central Forest Spine;
Royal Belum State Park;
Water resource in Belum Temenggor Forest Reserve
5. Annexes
52
Annex IX
Terms of Reference
Preparation of Fifth National Report to United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
Introduction
Malaysia, a mega-biodiversity country, is a party to the United Nations Convention
on Biological Diversity (CBD) since 1994. Under the Article 26 of the Convention,
Parties are obliged to report on the measures taken for implementation of the
Convention and their effectiveness. In other words, the focus of the reporting is on
implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action plan (NBSAP)
(Article 6), as well as on the CBD Strategic Plan, including its time-based biodiversity
targets, adopted by the Conference of the Parties.
The Conference of the Parties decided that Parties should submit their national
reports every four years or at an interval determined by COP. So far, Malaysia has
submitted four national reports to CBD. The Fifth (5th) National Reports are due on
31 March 2014 (decision X/10).
The GEF has recently approved a Biodiversity Enabling Activities project for
Malaysia which is supported by UNDP. The project titled “National biodiversity
planning to support the implementation of the CBD 2011 – 2020 strategic plan in
Malaysia” is implemented by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. It
seeks to integrate Malaysia‟s obligations under the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) into its national development and sectoral planning frameworks
through a renewed and participative „biodiversity planning‟ and strategising process,
in a manner that is in line with the global guidance in the CBD‟s Strategic Plan for
2011 – 2020”.
One of the key project outputs is to prepare and submit a 5th National Report that
fully covers the progress of NBSAP implementation, key changes in the status and
trends in biodiversity, threats and conservation, and will develop a long-term
reporting framework that will enable better track changes over time. The mentioned
framework may include: institutional anchoring, the statutory establishment of
technical committees, facilities and arrangements in place for data sourcing and
monitoring, etc.
Scope of Work
The purpose of this consultancy is to review, update and consolidate relevant data and information and produce the 5th National Report for submission to CBD, and facilitate stakeholder consultations. The consultant will work with Biodiversity and
53
Forestry Management Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) and UNDP. Methodology
The methodology includes desk research, site visits, interviews, meetings and workshops with relevant stakeholders and discussion with NRE and UNDP. Expected Outputs The consultant is expected to produce:
a) Discussion &presentation materials and proceedingsfor two workshops;
b) 5th national report, of at least 40 pages and no more than 100 pages, structured along the outline indicated in Annex 1. A detailed record of consultations with stakeholders will need to be kept and
provided, as an annex to the main report.
c) A Power Point presentation (circa 20-25 slides) covering the key points of
the report. d) An executive summary (in English and Bahasa Malaysia) of not more than 20 pages.
Duration
The consultancy will take place from 1 May 2013 to 31 April2014. The expected number of working months is 5 months including 20 working days missions to Sabah, Sarawak and selected States in Peninsular Malaysia. Deliverables and Timeline
The consultant is responsible for submitting the following deliverables to the UNDP Country Office and Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, NRE.
Deliverables Timeline
Detailed work plan To be submitted within 5 days of the signing of the contract
Discussion & presentation materials and proceedings for the National Workshop on the Preparation of 5th National Report
By 31 July 2013
Draft 5th National Report By 31 August 2013
Discussion & presentation materials and proceedings for Stakeholder Consultation Meeting/Workshop on the Finalisation of 5th National Report
By 1 December2013
Final 5th National Report(peer-reviewed, proof-read and edited) and a Power Point presentation
By 31 January 2014
Executive Summary in English By 1 March 2014
Executive Summary in Bahasa Malaysia By 1 April 2014
54
Terms of Payment
The fee is payable upon satisfactory completion of the deliverables. For payment in installments, certification of satisfactory performance at each phase is required.
Phase Percentage
Submission and acceptance of the detailed work plan 20%
Submission and acceptance of the draft 5th National Report to CBD by Technical Working Committee
30%
Submission and acceptance of the final 5th National Report to CBD by National Steering Committee
30%
Submission and acceptance of the Executive Summary (in English and Bahasa Malaysia by National Steering Committee
20%
Competencies
Functional competencies:
Extensive knowledge in biodiversity and ecosystems in Malaysia; Familiar with Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD); Sound analytical and organisational skills; Excellent communication and writing skills.
Corporate Competencies:
Demonstrates integrity by modeling the UN‟s values and ethical standards; Promotes the vision, mission, and strategic goals of UNDP; Displays cultural, gender, religion, race, nationality and age sensitivity and
adaptability Treats all people fairly without favoritism; Fulfills all obligations to gender sensitivity and zero tolerance for sexual
harassment. Expertise and Experience Required The consultant will be responsible for the delivery, content, technical quality and accuracy of the report. The consultant should ideally have the following expertise and experience:
a. Minimum of 8 years extensive working experience in any one of the following fields of study:
- Environmental studies (science and/or management) - Environmental economics - Environmental law or policy - Natural resources or biodiversity conservation - Environmental governance b. Demonstrated working experience in biodiversity assessments or national
reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and multilateral environmental agreements
c. A good understanding of biodiversity and conservation issues in Malaysia
55
d. A demonstrated understanding of the institutional, legislative, and administrative dynamics and dimensions of sustainable development in Malaysia
Language Requirements Excellent command of English and Malay.
56
Annex 1: Guideline for the Fifth National Report
Executive Summary
1. For the purposes of communicating to stakeholders at various levels, Parties
should prepare an executive summary of the fifth national report that provides
the main messages and key findings of the report. These might be derived from
answers to the Questions listed under each Part of the main report. The
executive summary should be short and concise, preferably between 6 to 10
pages in length. For example, there could be one (or two) paragraph(s) for each
question, with each paragraph containing a “bold” statement about the findings
of the report. It should ideally serve as a useful “stand-alone” tool to
communicate, educate and raise awareness of biodiversity among the general
public, relevant decision-makers and other key stakeholder groups. To this end,
Parties are encouraged to include illustrative tables, figures and images. While
the executive summary can only be finalized after the three main chapters of
this report have been completed, an early draft of the executive summary may
serve as a useful outline for the development of the report, helping to clarify the
main messages.
Main Parts of the Report
Part I: An update on biodiversity status, trends, and threats and implications
for human well-being
2. This part should answer the following questions:
Q1: Why is biodiversity important for your country? Please elaborate on the
importance of biodiversity by highlighting contributions of biodiversity and related
ecosystem services to human well-being and socio-economic development, using
information from completed and ongoing biodiversity assessments or studies. Where
possible provide estimates of economic, social and cultural values (the economic
value can be presented in monetary terms or, for example, in numbers of people
supported). Also highlight a few examples of exceptional biodiversity and
ecosystems in the country.
Q2: What major changes have taken place in the status and trends of
biodiversity in your country? Focus on changes that have occurred, or that have
become known, since the fourth or last national report was prepared. The analysis or
synthesis should provide a succinct overview of biodiversity status, trends and
threats sufficient to inform decision-makers, rather than an exhaustive assessment of
these issues. There is no need to repeat detailed descriptions of your country‟s
biodiversity that were provided in the fourth or previous national reports. However,
countries that have not presented a comprehensive analysis of the status and trends
57
of biodiversity in their previous reports could do so in this report. Where possible,
show changes in biodiversity or other trends over time and use quantitative
indicators (with technical details of the indicators provided in an annex). Also draw
upon expert qualitative assessments. Illustrate trends with charts, graphs, figures
and tables. Where possible, analyse how actions taken (i.e., actions described in
part II) have resulted in changes in biodiversity. Use case-studies to illustrate general
points. The case-studies should demonstrate significant reductions in the loss of
biodiversity (or a specific component) within a defined scale, and a clear rationale of
how this is linked to the actions taken. The case will be most useful if it contains
lessons that are more widely applicable.
Q3: What are the main threats to biodiversity? (Or, what are the main causes of
the negative changes described in the answer to question two?). For the main
biomes and/or components of biodiversity, describe the main direct drivers of
biodiversity loss (pressures) and the main indirect drivers (underlying causes) and
relate these to the relevant economic sectors. Be specific about the direct drivers
(e.g., “dynamite fishing”, “coastal development”), but also categorize them (habitat
change, climate change, overexploitation, invasive species, pollution), with some
detailed analysis.
Q4: What are the impacts of the changes in biodiversity for ecosystem
services and the socio-economic and cultural implications of these impacts?
Describe the impacts of declining biodiversity and ecosystems on human well-being,
livelihoods, poverty reduction, etc. Consider all relevant and significant ecosystem
goods and services.
Optional question: What are possible future changes for biodiversity and their
impacts? Describe plausible future scenarios for biodiversity in terms of underlying
causes, pressures, impacts on biodiversity and implications for human well-being.
For example, compare what might happen under “business as usual” policies with
what might happen with greater investment in biodiversity and ecosystems. Such
scenarios may be simple “what if?” narratives, or based on models if such models
are available. Any presentation of future scenarios should describe scientific
uncertainties.
Part II: The national biodiversity strategy and action plan, its implementation,
and the mainstreaming of biodiversity
3. This part should answer the following questions:
Q5: What are the biodiversity targets set by your country? Describe the
measurable targets (for example, for 2020) that have been developed in line with the
Aichi Biodiversity Targets of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. Please
58
provide further updates on the targets if your country has submitted a report to the
eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties.
Q6: How has your national biodiversity strategy and action plan been updated
to incorporate these targets and to serve as an effective instrument to
mainstream biodiversity? Provide a brief description of your national biodiversity
strategy and action plan. If the national biodiversity strategy and action plan has
been updated, how does it differ from the previous national biodiversity strategy and
action plan? Describe: (i) how the actions contained therein will achieve the targets
outlined in the answer to question five; (ii) how it will contribute to the achievement of
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020; (iii) how it will address the threats to
biodiversity identified in the answer to question three; and (iv) how it addresses the
guidance provided in decision IX/8. Describe in particular how the biodiversity
strategy and action plan will achieve the integration of biodiversity considerations
into broader national plans, programmes and policies, economic and social sectors
and levels of government.
Q7: What actions has your country taken to implement the Convention since
the fourth report and what have been the outcomes of these actions? Describe
relevant legislation, policies, institutional and cooperative mechanisms, and funding.
Where relevant, link these actions to outcomes in terms of the status and trends of
biodiversity and implications for human well-being. Use case studies and, as
appropriate, cross-reference to the answer to question two. Indicate how the actions
relate to the various programmes of work and cross-cutting issues of the Convention
(with details provided in appendix III), particularly those selected in the multi-year
programme of work of the Conference of the Parties for in-depth review at the
eleventh and twelfth meetings of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention.
Highlight any obstacles to implementation (including lack of capacity, human and
financial resources). Note that if your biodiversity strategy and action plan has been
recently updated, most of the actions reported may relate to the previous version.
Q8: How effectively has biodiversity been mainstreamed into relevant sectoral
and cross-sectoral strategies, plans and programmes? Describe how
biodiversity is reflected in poverty reduction strategies and other key cross-cutting
policy instruments, and into the various economic sectors (which sectors (and
ministries) integrate biodiversity well and which do not?). Describe also how
biodiversity is integrated into planning mechanisms. Describe actions taken and
outcomes achieved by each sector to implement biodiversity actions included in their
respective strategies, plans and programmes. Which tools are used (e.g., ecosystem
approach, biodiversity-inclusive environmental impact assessment and strategic
environmental assessment, spatial planning, etc.)? Describe also how synergies are
achieved at the national level in the implementation of the Convention on Biological
Diversity, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and other
59
relevant conventions. Describe also how biodiversity is considered in international
and/or transboundary cooperation, including South-South cooperation.
Q9. How fully has your national biodiversity strategy and action plan been
implemented? Analyse the extent to which the national biodiversity strategy and
action plan has been implemented. For example, what proportion of the planned
activities has been carried out and to what extent have the objectives been met.
Identify the remaining challenges for implementation. (Note that if your national
biodiversity strategy and action plan has been recently updated, this analysis will
relate primarily to the previous version of the national biodiversity strategy and action
plan).
Part III: Progress towards the 2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets and
contributions to the relevant 2015 Targets of the Millennium Development
Goals
4. This part should draw upon parts I and II to answer the following questions:
Q10: What progress has been made by your country towards the
implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi
Biodiversity Targets? Drawing upon information in parts I and II, analyse the
progress towards each of the 2020 targets of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity
2011-2020, as well as towards the overall mission of the Plan. Also indicate progress
towards the national targets referred to in the answer to question five (i.e., national
actions taken to achieve each target and outcomes achieved). Where possible, use
quantitative indicators including the application, as appropriate, of global headline
indicators contained in decision VIII/15, as well as additional indicators for measuring
progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets that may be adopted at the eleventh
meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Technical details of the indicators may
provided in an appendix. Also draw upon expert qualitative assessments. You may
wish to use a simple “traffic-light” scheme or similar illustrative tool to give an overall
assessment of progress.
Q11: What has been the contribution of actions to implement the Convention
towards the achievement of the relevant 2015 targets of the Millennium
Development Goals in your country? In order to highlight the importance of
biodiversity for achieving broader national objectives, and drawing upon, as
appropriate, information in parts I and II, analyse how the actions taken to implement
the Convention, particularly the implementation of the 2015 milestones and Aichi
Biodiversity Targets of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, have
contributed or are contributing to the achievement of relevant 2015 targets of the
Millennium Development Goals, as well as to the Millennium Development Goals
overall.
60
Q12: What lessons have been learned from the implementation of the
Convention in your country? Provide an analysis of lessons learned from
implementation, highlighting examples of successful and less successful actions
taken, including remaining challenges. Also provide suggestions for actions that
need to be taken at the national, regional and global levels to further enhance
implementation of the Convention at the national level and, in particular, to achieve
the strategic goals and targets of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.
Annexes and Appendices
5. Use annexes and appendices to provide detailed or supporting information that
is not necessary in the main report. Annexes and appendices may be bound
separately to limit the size of the main report. Suggested appendices are listed
here:
Appendix I - Information concerning the reporting Party and preparation of the
fifth national report. Please provide information on the process used to prepare this
report, including information on stakeholders involved and material used as a basis
for the report.
Appendix II - Further sources of information. Parties should provide sources of
information on national implementation, such as website addresses, publications,
databases and national reports submitted to other related conventions, forums and
organizations.
Appendix III - National implementation of the thematic programmes of work
and plans under the Convention on Biological Diversity or decisions of the
Conference of the Parties related to cross-cutting issues. Parties could use a
table or matrix1 to highlight how national actions taken to implement the national
biodiversity strategy and action plan, activities related to mainstreaming and the
Aichi Biodiversity Targets have contributed or are contributing to goals, targets and
activities suggested in the thematic programmes of work and plans or decisions
related to cross-cutting issues, particularly those selected in the post-2010 multi-year
programme of work of the Convention for in-depth review at the eleventh and twelfth
meetings of the Conference of the Parties. Parties could focus on those thematic
areas and cross-cutting issues that are nationally-relevant and important.
1 The table or matrix will be developed and provided to Parties in the reference manual for the fifth national report
referred to in paragraph 6 above.
61
Annex X
Summary Report of the NBSAP Inception Workshop
Introduction
The Inception Workshop for NRE-UNDP/GEF Project: National Biodiversity Planning
to Support the Implementation of The CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Malaysia
(NBSAP) was held on the 20 December 2012 at The Royale Chulan hotel, Kuala
Lumpur. This half day workshop was attended by over 30 participants comprise of
representatives from relevant government agencies, research institute, state
representatives and NGOs. The list of participants is attached in Annex 1.
Opening and Presentation
2. The Inception Workshop was held to introduce to the relevant stakeholders on
of the overall objective of the project and to provide them with the opportunity to
comment and give input on the project implementation schedule and Strategic Result
Framework. The workshop was also held to explore the needs and discuss issues to
that should be addressed under the project. The expected outputs of the workshop
were comments on Project indicators, project targets and proposed outputs.
3. The workshop was opened by Ms. Wan Hasmah Wan Mohd, Undersecretary
of Biodiversity and Forestry Management Division, Ministry of Natural Resources
and Environment (BBP, NRE). She highlighted the importance of this project which is
to assist sustainable biodiversity management in the country as well as implementing
Malaysia‟s obligation under the Convention of Biological Diversity.
4. A presentation entitled Introduction to NRE-UNDP/GEF Project: National
Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of The CBD 2011-2020
Strategic Plan in Malaysia (NBSAP) by Mr. K. Nagulendran, BBP, NRE (Annex 2)
was made, followed by presentation of Ms. Gan Pek Chuan from UNDP on the
potential Strategic Studies as mentioned in the NBSAP Project Document that can
be undertaken to contribute to the Revision of National Policy and Action Plan on
Biological Diversity. The presentations are attached in Annex 3.
Break-out Group Discussion
4. After the presentation, participants were divided into 5 break-out groups.
Group discussions were guided by a guidance note and 4 specific questions to be
discussed (Annex 4). The session was fruitful whereby participants contributed
constructively on the project‟s SRF and work plan. Summary of comments is listed
in the following table:
62
Table 1: Reporting by the Break-out groups to the Plenary
NO. ITEM COMMENTS
1. Output 1.1
Review and stocktaking of products
and results from previous
biodiversity planning processes at
the national level are carried out in a
participative manner
This is an important exercise and good
baseline can be developed during the
stocktaking exercise. Identification of
relevant stakeholders and the objective
of the stocktaking workshop should be
clearly defined.
2. Output 1.2
In response to the global Aichi
Targets, national biodiversity targets
are developed in a manner that is
attuned to Malaysia‟s circumstances
National circumstances such as
definition for protected area (PA) should
be clearly defined in the target setting
exercise. In addition, resource
mobilization is needed in implementing
the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and some
targets that are deemed important
should be pushed further such as forest
cover and PA (target 17).
3. Output 1.3
The achievement of national
biodiversity targets, developed in
line with the global Aichi Targets, is
duly monitored during the project
duration and beyond, and this is
reported upon to the CBD through
national reports and other means.
Implementation period of output 1.3
suggested to be extended from 6
months to one year.
4. Output 2.1
A National Biodiversity Strategy and
Action Plan (NBSAP) for Malaysia,
anchored into national development
frameworks, is updated, in a manner
that is participative, widely
disseminated and fully integrates
new aspects of the CBD strategic
plan, such as: (i) mainstreaming; (ii)
the valuing of ecosystem goods and
services; and (iii) the incorporation
of challenges and opportunities
linked to ecosystem-based
More time is needed to mainstream the
updated NBSAP into national
development framework. Generally,
outcome 2 aims to update the NBSAP
to include new aspects of the CBD
Strategic Plan namely valuing
ecosystem goods and services and
incorporating challenges and
opportunities linked to ecosystem
based adaptation and resilience. The
workshop suggested a review on
outcome 2 as it is rather ambitious to
undertake ecosystem valuation in a
63
NO. ITEM COMMENTS
adaptation and resilience. short period.
5. Outcome 3
National framework for resource
mobilization, Convention reporting
and exchange mechanisms are
established and strengthened
As for Activities 3.1.1, 3.1.2 and 3.4.1
under Outcome 3, it was suggested that
they commence in the middle of year
2013 for the duration of one year so
that it can be in-line with Activities
2.1.1 under Outcome 2 (updated
NBSAP including new aspects of CBD).
Activities 3.4.2 on establishment of a
national coordination structure was
advised to be commenced in the first
quarter of 2014 to overlap with activities
underlined under 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2,
3.4.1.
6. Three sectoral planning frameworks
chosen for the inclusion of
measurable biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use
targets
The three sectors chosen are:
Commodities
Forestry
Fishery
7. The three sectors for the inclusion of
measurable biodiversity
conservation and sustainable use
targets into development framework
The three sectors chosen are:
Development finance
land use management, including
spatial and infrastructural
development planning
Climate change mainstreaming
8. Review of the project schedule The fourth point being discussed in the
workshop was to review the project
schedule and see if the milestone given
is realistic. The groups suggested a
review should be given and while the
project schedule (Annex V) was
generally acceptable, stocktaking
activities in Q1 in 2013 should be
prolonged to the first half of 2013.
Besides that, the development of
national targets scheduled by the end
of year 2013 would be more realistic
instead of in the middle of year 2014.
However, achievement of sectoral
64
NO. ITEM COMMENTS
integration by the end of year 2015 was
viewed to be somewhat challenging.
9. General comments The workshop felt that this project
should be made known to the National
Biodiversity Council prior to reporting to
CBD in 2014.
A suggestion was also made for NRE to
prepare a Standard Operating
Procedure to approach state
governments to implement the NBSAP.
5. At the closing of the workshop, the organizer expressed NRE‟s appreciation to
all participants for their active participation and contributions to the workshop.
Valuable comments and suggestions from the participants showed there are
significant interests of involvement in this project and NRE looks forward to future