9/9 FRI 4:15 | Avon Park AFR: Joint Land Use Study 2

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Michael Bomar, PETetra Tech

FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE

September 9, 2011

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR

EACH JURISDICTION

DEVELOP POTENTIAL

STRATEGIES

PROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONS

APPROACH

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Issue Description

Jurisdiction

Highlands Count

y

Avon Park

Sebring

Okeechobee Count

y

Osceola

County

Polk Count

y

Frostproof

Military Operation Areas (MOA) √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Buffer Area √     √ √ √  

Low Level Flight Areas √     √ √ √  

Aircraft Noise √     √ √ √  

Blast Noise √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Outdoor Lighting—Night Vision Training Areas √     √ √ √  

Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazards (BASH) √     √ √ √  

Conservation Resources √     √ √ √  

Transportation Interchanges &/or Corridors √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Public Access √     √ √ √  

General Aviation and Military Aircraft Conflicts √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Design & Construction Standards

Effective Disclosure Measures Lighting Standards Educational Handouts on Radio

Frequency Public Awareness Measures Implement Sound Attenuation

Construction Requirements Identify Military Operations

Areas on Public Documents Military Influence Planning Area

(MIPA) Ordinance Small Area Studies Comprehensive Plan & Land

Development Code Updates Military and Inter-

Governmental Coordination Limit Object Heights Airspace Studies Designate Specific Use

Restrictions to Maintain Compatibility

Voluntary Land or Development Rights Acquisition Program

Additional Noise Study Site Specific R/AICUZ for APAFR

Highlands CountyAvon ParkSebring

Okeechobee County

Osceola County

Polk CountyFrostproof

APAFR

PROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONS

IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH

JURISDICTION

DEVELOP POTENTIAL

STRATEGIES

Types of Development Near APAFR Boundary

Military Operations Areas (MOAs)

Aircraft Noise Blast Noise Intensity &

Frequency Low Level Flight Area Outdoor Lighting-Night Vision

Goggle Training Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazard

(BASH) Conservation Resources Transportation Corridors &

Study Areas Unrestricted Public Access General Aviation & Military

Aircraft Conflicts

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

INTEGRATED ROLES

JLUS Policy Committee

JLUS Technical Working Group

APAFR JLUS

Public

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

APAFR F-35

=JOINT

LAND

USE

STUDY

ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT

STATEMENT

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Jurisdiction

Summary of Recommendations

Continue Ongoing Coordination with FAA

Identify Military Operations and High Noise Areas on Public Documents

Implement Public Awareness Measures

Implement Effective Disclosure Procedures

Implement Lighting Standards to Avoid Glare and Reflection

Evaluate Opportunities to Manage Public Access

Develop Plan For Critical Areas Supporting Military Readiness and /or Environmental Conservation

Continue and Support Ongoing APAFR Environmental Stewardship Program

Seek Funding for Updated Noise Study

Conduct Noise Study

Update JLUS Document With Results from Noise Study

Develop and Distribute BASH Educational Material

Develop Program Exploring Methods to Control Bird and Wildlife Near APAFR

Monitor Land Use at/near Transportation Corridors &/or Hubs

Formulize Policy To Implement Cross-Jurisdictional Collaboration and Coordination

Monitor Recertification of Runway and Seek Funding for the Preparation of APAFR R/AICUZ

Participate & Encourage Public to Participate in Preparation of APAFR R/AICUZ

Update Comp Plan & LDC to Strengthen Uses Compatible to APAFR Missions

Establish MIPA Overlay Districts I, II, and III

Revise Compatible Land Use Ordinance

Implement Noise Attenuation Standards for New Construction in MIPA I and II

Limit Object Heights in MIPA’s

Adopt Resolution Supporting JLUS Recommendations & Implementation

Support CFRPC Continuing As Lead Facilitator of JLUS Implementation Activities

Polk County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Frostproof Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Osceola County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Highlands County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Avon Park Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Sebring  Ö Ö Ö  Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Okeechobee County  Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö  Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

APAFR Ö Ö Ö  Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

RECOMMENDATIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL

NOISE

LAND USE

COORDINATION

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Michael Bomar, PETetra Tech

FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE

September 9, 2011

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

RECOMMENDATIONS

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE

Military Influence Planning Area

(MIPA) Designation

Geographic Vicinity

3 Mile Buffer

Contains Areas of Moderate Risk

of Blast Noise Complaints

Contains Areas of Low Risk of

Blast Noise Complaints

Low Level Flight

Training Areas

Night Vision Training

Areas

I § § § § §II   § § § §III      §  

MIPA-I: Focused on addressing compatibility issues in a three mile buffer zone around the perimeter of the Range and those areas where a moderate risk of blast noise complaints occur. It also includes a portion of low level flight training areas and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-I’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. The designation of MIPA-I’s are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.

MIPA-II: Identified to address compatibility issues related to blast noise, low level flight training and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-II’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. MIPA-II designations are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.

MIPA-III: Related to Areas of low risk of blast noise complaints, the presence of civilian aircraft operations and this area’s general proximity to MIPA’s I and II. The distance beyond the Range boundary for MIPA-III’s vary but the MIPA-III areas generally exist in the low level of blast noise risk areas outside MIPA’s I and II.

MILITARY INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS (MIPAs)