Homework Help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Research Paper help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Online Tutoring https://www.homeworkping.com/ click here for freelancing tutoring sites A STUDY ON EFFECTIVENESS OF EMPLOYEES SAFETY AND HEALTH AT RANE MADRAS LIMITED SUMMER PROJECT REPORT Submitted by N.VASANTHY REGISTER NO: 27348354 Under the Guidance of Mrs.K.VIDHYA, MBA, M.Phil. Faculty, Department of Management Studies in partial fulfilment for the award of the degree of
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Homework Help https://www.homeworkping.com/
Research Paper helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/
Online Tutoringhttps://www.homeworkping.com/
click here for freelancing tutoring sitesA STUDY ON EFFECTIVENESS OF EMPLOYEES
Nine surveys were found that measured the patient safety climate of an organization.
All used Likert scales, mostly to measure attitudes of individuals. Nearly all covered five
common dimensions of patient safety climate: leadership, policies and procedures, staffing,
communication, and reporting. The strength of psychometric testing varied. While all had
been used to compare units within or between hospitals, only one had explored the association
between organizational climate and patient outcomes.
2.2.2 Relative Effectiveness of Worker Safety and Health Training Methods
Michael J. Burke, PhD, Sue Ann Sarpy, PhD, Kristin Smith-Crowe, PhD, Suzanne
Chan-Serafin, BA, Rommel O. Salvador, MBA and Gazi Islam, BA
As training methods became more engaging (i.e., requiring trainees’ active
participation), workers demonstrated greater knowledge acquisition, and reductions were seen
in accidents, illnesses, and injuries. All methods of training produced meaningful behavioral
performance improvements.
2.2.3 The Ecology of Work and Health:
Research and Policy Directions for the Promotion of Employee Health
Daniel Stokols, PhD ,Kenneth R. Pelletier, PhD, MD ,Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA
This article identifies new research and policy directions for the field of worksite
health in the context of the changing workplace.
These directions are viewed from an ecological perspective on worksite health and are
organized around three major themes: (1) the joint influence of physical and social
environmental factors on occupational health, (2) the effects of non occupational settings
(e.g., households, the health care system) on employee well-being and the implications of
recent changes in these settings for worksite health programs, and (3) methodological issues
in the design and evaluation of worksite health programs. Developments in these areas
suggest that the field of worksite health may be undergoing a fundamental paradigm shift
away from individually oriented wellness programs (provided at the worksite and aimed
primarily at changing employees' health behavior) and toward broader formulations
emphasizing the joint impact of the physical and social environment at work, job-person fit,
and work policies on employee well-being.
CHAPTER III
OBJECTIVES
To study and analyze the effectiveness of Employee Safety and Health at Rane Madras
Limited.
To trace the causes of accident in the work place.
To study to which extent employees are practicing safety and health in the real work
situation.
To assess the management commitment towards employees safety and health.
To suggest suitable measures for improving employees safety and health.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH
Research is a process in which the researcher wishes to find out the end result for a
given problem and thus the solution helps in future course of action. The research has been
defined as “A careful investigation or enquiry especially through search for new fact in any
branch of knowledge”.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The procedure using, which researchers go about their work of describing, explaining
and predicting phenomena, is called Methodology. Methods compromise the procedures used
for generating, collecting, and evaluating data. Methods are the ways of obtaining information
useful for assessing explanation.
TYPES OF RESEARCH
The type of research used in this project is descriptive in nature. Descriptive research
is essentially a fact finding related largely to the present, abstracting generations by cross
sectional study of the current situation .The descriptive methods are extensively used in the
physical and natural science, for instance when physics measures, biology classifies, zoology
dissects and geology studies the rock. But its use in social science is more common, as in
socio economic surveys and job and activity analysis.
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH AIMS AT
To portray the characteristics of a particular individual situation or group(with or
without specific initial hypothesis about the nature of this characteristics).
To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is
associated with something else( usually , but not always ,with a specific initial
hypothesis).
The descriptive method has certain limitation; one is that the research may make description
itself an end itself.
Research is essentially creative and demands the discovery of facts on order to lead a
solution of the problem. A second limitation is associated whether the statistical techniques
dominate. The desire to over emphasis central tendencies and to fact in terms of Average,
Correlation, Means and dispersion may not always be either welcome.
This limitation arises because statistics which is partly a descriptive tool of analysis can aid
but not always explain casual relation.
DESIGN OF DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES:
Descriptive studies aim at portraying accurately the characteristics of a particular
group or solution. One may under take a descriptive study about the work in the factory,
health and welfare. A descriptive study may be concerned with the right to strike, capital
punishment, prohibition etc.
A descriptive study involves the following steps:
1. Formulating the objectives of the study .
2. Defining the population and selecting the sample .
3. Designing the method of data collection .
4. Analysis of the data .
5. Conclusion and recommendation for further improvement in the practices.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design is the specification of the method and procedure for acquiring the
information needed to solve the problem.
The research design followed for this research study is descriptive research design where we
find a solution to an existing problem. The problem of this study is to find the effectiveness of
Employees Safety & Health at Rane Madras Limited.
UNIVERSE AND SAMPLING:This study was restricted to the blue collar employees. Out of the universe of 369 blue
collars, a sample of 100 respondents was selected by simple random sampling method. All the
opinions expressed herein are the contribution by the respondents only.
DATA COLLECTION METHOD
Survey method is considered the best method for data collection and the tool used for
data collection are Questionnaire. Private individuals, research workers, private and public
organizations and even government are adopting it. In this method a questionnaire is collected
through personal interview. A questionnaire consists of a number of question involves both
specific and general question related to Employees Safety & Health.
SOURCES OF DATA
The two sources of data collection are namely primary & secondary.
Primary data
Primary data are fresh data collected through survey from the employees using
questionnaire.
Secondary data
Secondary data are collected from books, internet and various journals, magazines
etc.
STATISTICAL TOOLS USED
PERCENTAGE METHOD
In this project percentage method test and used. The following are the formula
Percentage of Respondent = No. of Respondent x 100
Total no. of Respondent
CHI - SQUARE Analysis
In this project chi- square test was used. This test is used to test significance of
association between two attributes. Chi- square, symbolically written as χ 2 (pronounce as
Ki- square), is a statistical measure used in the context of sampling analysis for comparing
a variance to a theoretical variance. Formula for finding chi square is
χ 2 = ∑(O-E)2/ E
In this study chi-square is to find the association between respondents
gender and respondents accident proneness, respondents accident proneness and enough
training for the employees & employees work load and the approach of the organization .
CORRELATION ANALYSIS
Correlation Analysis is a statistical technique used to measure the magnitude of
linear relationship between two variables. Correlation Analysis is not used in isolation to
describe the relationship between variables. To analyze the relation between two
variables, two prominent correlation coefficient are used –the Pearson product correlation
coefficient and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient .
In this study the Pearson product correlation coefficient is used to find the correlation
coefficient between respondents awareness level at the time of joining with employees
participation in suggestion scheme & respondents awareness level at present and the
counseling .
This is also known as simple correlation coefficient and is denoted by “r”.The “r”
value ranges from -1, through 0, to +1.It is calculated using the formula
r = ∑ xy / √∑ x2.∑ y2
CHAPTER: V
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
DISTRIBUTION OF REPONDENTS BY THEIR DESIGNATION
Table No. : 5.1S.NO. DESIGNATION No. Of
Respondent
PERCENTAGE
1
2
3
4
5
Apprentice
Temporary 0perating
trainees
Operators
Contract Labour
Executives
11
31
31
15
12
11
31
31
15
12
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 11% of the respondents are Apprendice.31% of
the respondents are Temporary operating trainees.31% of the respondents are Operators. 15%
of the respondents are Contract labours and 12% of the respondents are Executives.
CHART No. :5.1
DISTRIBUTION OF REPONDENTS BY THEIR GENDER
Table No. : 5.2S.NO. Gender No. of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
1
2
Male
Female
75
25
75
25
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the table it is inferred that 75% of the respondents are Male and 25% of the
respondents are Female.
CHART No. : 5.2
DISTRIBUTION OF REPONDENTS BY THEIR AGE
Table No. : 5.3
S.NO. Age No. Of
Respondents
Percentage (%)
1.
2
3
4.
5.
<25
26-30
31-35
36-40
>40 Years
54
21
22
3
-
54
21
22
3
-
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it was inferred that 54% of the respondents are above 25
years. .22% of the respondents belong to the age group of 31-35 and the remaining 24% of the
respondents belong to the age group of 26-30 and 36-40.
CHART No.: 5.3
DISTRIBUTION OF REPONDENTS BY THEIR EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION
Table No. : 5.4
S.NO. EDUCATIONAL
QUALIFICATION
NO. OF
RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SSLC/HSC
ITI
Diploma
Graduation
Post-Graduation
47
16
17
17
3
47
16
17
17
3
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 47% of the respondents have an educational
qualification of SSLC/HSC. 16% of the respondents have an educational qualification of ITI.
49%of the respondents have an educational qualification of Diploma and Graduation and the
remaining 3% are post graduation.
CHART No. :5.4
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BY THEIR ACCIDENT PRONENESS
Table No. : 5.5
S.NO. Accident
proneness
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2.
Yes
No
22
78
22
78
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 22% of the respondents have accident
proneness and 78% of the respondents have no accident proneness
CHART No. : 5.5
.
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BY THEIR MAJOR REASONS FOR THE
WORK PLACE ACCIDENT
Table No. : 5.6S.NO. Work Place
Accident
No. of Respondents Percentage
1
2
Work based
Worker based
11
89
11
89
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 11% of the work place accidents owing to work
and the remaining 89% of work place accidents owing to workers.
CHART No. : 5.6
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BY THEIR MAJOR REASONS FOR THE
WORKER BASED ACCIDENT
Table No. : 5.7
S.NO. Worker Based Accident No. of Respondents Percentage
1
2
3
4
5
Lack of adequate skill
Neglecting safety devices
Unsafe material handling
Disturbed mental condition
Unsafe speed
1
7
78
6
8
1
7
78
6
8
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 78% of the worker based accidents due to
unsafe material handling. 8% of the worker based accidents due to unsafe speed and the
remaining 14% of the worker based accidents due to lack of adequate skill, Neglecting safety
devices, Disturbed mental condition.
CHART No. : 5.7
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR SIGNIFICANT
AWARENESS LEVEL AT THE TIME OF JOINING
Table No. : 5. 8S.No. Awareness level at
the time of joining
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
3
4
5
Very High
High
Low
Very Low
None
1
25
6
51
17
1
25
6
51
17
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that awareness of 1% of respondents have very high
at the time of joining 25% of respondents have high awareness at the time of joining and the
remaining 74% of respondents have low, very low and no awareness at the time of joining .
CHART No. : 5.8.
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR SIGNIFICANT
AWARENESS AT PRESENT
Table No. : 5.9S.No. Awareness level at
present
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2.
Yes
No
96
4
96
4
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 96% of the respondents have awareness at
present and 4 % of the respondents have no awareness at present.
CHART No. : 5.9
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR SIGNIFICANT
AWARENESS THROUGH
Table No. : 5.10S.No. Awareness Through No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
3
4
Motion Pictures
Written brouchers
Colleagues
Manager in Person
59
5
9
27
59
5
9
27
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 59% of the respondents acquired the
knowledge through motion pictures, 27% of the respondents through manager in person and
the remaining 14% of the respondents through written brouchers, colleagues.
CHART No. : 5.10
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE WORK LOAD IN
ORGANISATION
Table No. : 5.11S.No Acceptable Level Of
Work Load
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
58
42
58
42
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 58% of the respondents have satisfactory level
of work load in the organization and the remaining 42% have unsatisfactory level of work
load.
CHART No. : 5.11
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON ENOUGH TRAINING
Table NO. :5. 12
S.NO. Enough Training
Regarding Employees
Safety an Health
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
36
64
36
64
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is evident that 36% 0f the respondents said that they get
enough training regarding employee’s safety and health and 64% 0f the respondents opposed
this.
CHART NO. : 5.12
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE EMPLOYEES INTEREST
TO PARTICIPATE IN SUGGESTION SCHEME
Table No. : 5.13S.No. Employee interest No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
92
8
92
8
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is evident that 92% 0f the respondents have interest to
participate in suggestion scheme regarding employee’s safety and health and 8% of the
respondents have no interest.
CHART No. : 5.13
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE EMPLOYEES LEVEL OF
PARTICIPATION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION
Table No.: 5. 14
S.No. Employees level of
participation in
implementation
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
3
4
5
Very High
High
Low
Very Low
None
6
26
5
26
37
6
26
5
26
37
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is evident that participation level of 6% 0f the respondents
have very high ,26% 0f the respondents have high and the remaining 68% 0f the respondents
have low, very low and no participation.
CHART No. : 5.14
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE
FREQUENCY OF SAFETY TRAINING
Table No. : 5.15
S.No. Frequency of
safety training
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
3
Weekly
Monthly
Yearly
16
21
63
16
21
63
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 16% of the respondents said that every week
safety training conducted in the organization. 21% of the respondents said that every month
safety training conducted in the organization and 63 % of the respondents said that every year
safety training conducted in the organization.
CHART No. : 5.15
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE ENOUGH FIRST AID
FACILITIES
Table No. : 5.16
S.No. First Aid Facilities No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
34
66
34
66
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 34% of the respondents states that they have
enough first aid facilities and 66% of the respondents states that they have insufficient first aid
facilities .
CHART No. : 5.16
Enough First aid Facilities
34
66
Yes
No
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE REASONS FOR THE
STRESS RELIEF MEASURES
Table No. : 5.17
S.No. Stress Relief Measures No. of
Respondents Percentage
1
2
3
4
Reasonable hours of
work
Rest pauses
Holidays and leave with
pay
Appreciating employees
for their work
15
20
26
39
15
20
26
39
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is found that for the stress relief measures 15% of the
respondents have reasonable hours of work, 20% of the respondents have rest pauses,26% of
the respondents have holidays and leave with pay and 39% of the respondents have
appreciating employees for their work.
CHART No. : 5.17
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Table No. : 5.18
S.No. Recreational
facilities
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
46
54
46
54
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 46% of respondents state that they have
recreational facilities and 54% of respondents state that they have no recreational facilities.
CHART No. : 5.18
Recreational facilities
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE
PRACTICING METHOD OF ERGONOMICS
Table No. : 5.19
S.No. The
Practicing
method
Ergonomics
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
2
98
2
98
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is found that 2% of the respondents said that they are
practicing the method of Ergonomics and 98% of the respondents said that they are not
practicing the method of Ergonomics.
CHART No. : 5.19
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE COUNSELING
Table No. : 5.20
S.No. Counseling No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
7
93
7
93
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is evident that 7% of the respondents said that they have
counseling for the employees concerning personal and technical problems and 93% of the
respondents opposed this.
CHART No. : 5.20
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE PRE EMPLOYMENT AND
POST EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL CHECK
Table No. : 5.21
S.No. Medical check No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
Yes
No
37
63
37
63
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is inferred that 37% of the respondents states that they have
pre employment and post employment medical check and 63% of the respondents opposed
this.
CHART No. : 5.21
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON THE
APPROACH OF THE ORGANIZATION
Table No. : 5.22
S.No. Approach of the
organization
No. of
Respondents
Percentage
1
2
3
4
Flexible
People oriented
Transparent
Production Oriented
17
15
32
36
17
15
32
36
Total 100 100
INFERENCE
From the above table it is found that 17% of the respondents feels flexible towards the
approach of the organization. 15% of the respondents feels the approach of the organization as
people oriented. 32% of the respondents feels Transparent towards the approach of the
organization and 36% of the respondents feels the approach of the organization as production
oriented.
CHART No. : 5.22
Table No. : 5.23
ANALYSIS USING CHI-SQUARE
TO FIND THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN RESPONDENTS GENDER AND THE
RESPONDENTS ACCIDENT PRONENESS
Observed count
S.No. Gender
Accident
proneness
Yes No
Total
1
2
Male
Female
14 61
8 17
75
25
Total 22 78 100
Expected count
S.No. Gender
Accident
proneness
Yes No
Total
1
2
Male
Female
16.5 58.5
5.5 19.5
75.0
25.0
Total 22.0 78.0 100
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between respondents gender and the respondents
accident proneness.
Chi- square
O E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ E
14 16.5 6.25 0.378
8 5.5 6.25 1.136
61 58.5 6.25 0.106
17 19.5 6.25 0.320
∑(O-E)2/ E =1.94
Degrees of Freedom = 1
Tabulated Value for χ 2 for 1 degree of freedom @ 5% level of
Significance is 3.841
Calculated Value < Tabulated Value
Therefore HO is accepted.
INFERENCE
There is significant association between respondents gender and the respondents
accident proneness
Table No. : 5.24
ANALYSIS USING CHI-SQUARE
TO FIND ASSOCIATION BETWEEN RESPONDENTS ACCIDENT PRONENESS AND
ENOUGH TRAINING FOR THE EMPLOYEES
Observed count
S.No. Accident
Proneness
Enough training
for the employees
Yes No
Total
1
2
Yes
No
7 15
29 49
22
78
Total 36 64 100
Expected count
S.No. Accident
Proneness
Enough training
for the employees
Yes No
Total
1
2
Yes
No
7.9 14.1
28.1 49.9
22
78
Total 36.0 64.0 100
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between respondents accident proneness and enough
training for the employees
Chi- square
O E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ E
7 7.9 0.81 0.1025
29 28.1 0.81 0.0288
15 14.1 0.81 0.057
49 49.9 0.81 0.016
∑(O-E)2/ E = 0.2043
Degrees of Freedom = 1
Tabulated Value for χ 2 for 1degree of freedom @ 5% level of
Significance is 3.841
Calculated Value < Tabulated Value
Therefore HO is accepted
INFERENCE
There is a significant association between respondents accident proneness and enough
training for the employees.
Table No. : 5.25
ANALYSIS USING CHI-SQUARE
TO FIND ASSOCIATION BETWEEN EMPLOYEES WORK LOAD AND THE
APPROACH OF THE ORGANIZATION
Observed count
S.
No.
Acceptable
level of
work load
Approach of the organization
Flexible Transparent People Production
oriented
Total
1
2
Yes
No
11 12 15 20
6 3 17 16
58
42
Total 17 15 32 36 100
Expected count
S.
No.
Acceptable
level of
work load
Approach of the organization
Flexible Transparent People Production
oriented
Total
1
2
Yes
No
9.9 8.7 18.6 20.9
7.1 6.3 13.4 15.1
58
42
Total 17 15 32 36 100
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between the employees work load and the approach
of the organization.
Chi- square
O E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ E
11 9.9 1.21 0.122
6 7.1 1.21 0.170
12 8.7 10.89 1.251
3 6.3 10.89 1.728
15 18.6 12.96 0.696
17 13.4 12.96 0.967
20 20.9 0.81 0.038
16 15.1 0.81 0.053
∑(O-E)2/ E = 5.025
Degrees of Freedom = 2
Tabulated Value for χ 2 for 2 degree of freedom @ 5% level of
Significance is 5.991
Calculated Value < Tabulated Value
Therefore HO is accepted
INFERENCE
There is a significant association between the employees work load and the approach
of the organization.
TABLE No. : 5.26
ANALYSIS USING CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
TO FIND CORRELATION COEFFICIENT BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AWARENESS
LEVEL AT THE TIME OF JOINING AND THE EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATION
Let,
X be the respondents awareness level at the time of joining
Y be the employees participation in suggestion scheme
X Y x x2 y y2 xy
1 6 -19 361 -14 196 266
25 26 5 25 6 36 30
6 5 -14 196 -15 225 210
51 26 31 961 6 36 186
17 37 -3 9 17 289 -51
∑ x2 =1552 ∑ y2 = 782 ∑ xy=641
r = ∑ xy
√∑ x2.∑ y2
= 641
√1552*782
r = 0.5816
INFERENCE
The value of ‘r’ indicates that is a positive correlation exist between two variables,
respondents awareness level at the time of joining and the employees participation. Hence it
can be concluded that as the awareness level increases, employees participation in suggestion
also increases.
TABLE No. : 5.27
ANALYSIS USING CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
TO FIND THE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT BETWEEN RESPONDENTS
AWARENESS LEVEL AT PRESENT AND THE COUNSELING
Let,
X be the respondents awareness level at present
Y be the counseling
X Y x x2 y y2 xy
7 96 -43 1849 46 2116 -1978
93 4 43 1849 -46 2116 -1978
∑ x2 = 3698 ∑ y2 = 4232 ∑ xy=3956
r = ∑ xy
√∑ x2.∑ y2
= 3956
√3698 *4232
r = 1INFERENCE
The value of ‘r’ indicates that a high degree of positive correlation exist between two
variables, respondents awareness level at present and the counseling.
CHAPTER VI
FINDINGS OF STUDY It is found that 31% of the respondents are Temporary operating
trainees.31% of the respondents are Operators.
It is evident that most of the respondents are Male.
It is found that 54% of the respondents are above 25 years.
It is found that 47% of the respondents have an educational qualification of
SSLC/HSC.
It is evident that majority of the respondents have no accident proneness.
It is found that most of work place accidents owing to workers.
It is found that 78% of the worker based accidents due to unsafe material handling. It is found that 51% of the respondents have no awareness concerning Employees
Safety & Health at the time of joining.
It is astonished that at present majority of the respondents have awareness concerning
Employees Safety & Health.
It is evident that 59% of the respondents acquired the knowledge regarding Employees
Safety & Health through motion pictures.
It is found that 58% of the respondents have satisfactory level of work load in the
organization.
It is found that 64% of the respondents have no sufficient training about Employees
Safety & Health.
It is evident that 92% of the respondents have interest to participate in suggestion
scheme regarding employees safety and health.
It is found that participation level of 37% of the respondents participation level is
none.
It is found that 63 % of the respondents states that every year safety training is
conducted in the organization.
It is evident that most of the respondents states that they have inadequate first aid
facilities.
It is found that 39% of the respondents states appreciating employees for their work as
a stress relief measure.
It is evident that 54% of respondents state that they have no recreational facilities.
It is found that 98% of the respondents said that they are not practicing the method of
Ergonomics.
It is found that 92% of the respondents said that they have no counseling for the
employees pertaining to personal and technical problems.
It is found that 63% respondents states that they have no pre employment and post
employment medical check.
It is evident that most of the respondents feels that the organization approach is mainly
towards production.
SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The major cause for the workplace accidents that occur in the organization is unsafe
handling of material. So the vestibule training method can be included in employee
training program.
The frequency of safety training for the employees on safety and health can be altered
to monthly once instead of yearly twice.
Proper maintaining of adequate First aid facilities should be ensured.
The rest roam should be reconstructed with sufficient space and the sports center
facility can also be extended to temporary labours.
Ergonomics method should be followed. In an ergonomic workplace tools are
designed to fit individual capabilities and limitation so that people can do their job
without being injured.
Work environment causes number of problems, counseling enables to overcome
personal and technical problems.
A careful Pre employment and Post employment medical check up can also be
extended to temporary labours.
CHAPTER VII
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis will give a clear idea as to the situation of a large number of accidents
that occur in the organization and the steps that an organization should take to reduce these
accidents and to prevent them from occurring in future.
Some of the suggested measures for improving employees safety and health include
vestibule training method, first aid facilities, recreational facilities, counseling program, pre
employment and post employment medical check up for improving the effectiveness of
employees safety and health.
The findings of the survey will be utilized to bring about the necessary changes in
Employees Safety & Health procedures in the company.
The above concept could be better envisaged to bring about the better safety and health
for the employees by inculcating the concept of Ergonomics.
CHAPTER VIII
SCOPE FOR THE FURTHER STUDY
The project throws light on the need for learning Employees Safety & Health.
The project was developed based on the employees expectation.
It will be helpful for the management to improve the Employees Safety & Health
measures in the organization.
This study would be a base for the researchers who are carry survey for the same.
The study also helps the concern for the further enhancement for their manufacturing
with employees safety & health by elaborating the current survey.
LIMITATIONS
The study is based upon the small population size of 100 samples at Rane Madras
Limited.
Data were only collected from shop- floor employees
Time available for this research work was a limiting factor.
The study is based on the effectiveness of Employees Safety & Health measures. It does
not explore the pros and corns on the side of employers.
QUESTIONNAIREA Study on Effectiveness of Employees Safety and Health at Rane (Madras) Limited –
Puducherry
I. PERSONAL DETAILS
1. Department :
2. Designation :
3. Gender :
4. Age :
a. < 25 yrs b.26-30 yrs c. 31-35 yrs d.36-40 yrs e. > 40yrs
5. Marital status :
a. Married b. Unmarried
6 Educational Qualification
a. SSLC/HSC b. ITI c. Diploma d. Graduation
e. Post Graduation
7. Work Category
a. Technical b. Non- Technical
8. Total Work Experience
a. < 1 yrs b. 2-4 yrs c.5-7 yrs d. 8-10 yrs e.>10 yrs
II. CAUSES OF ACCIDENT
9. Do you have accident proneness (fear)?
a. Yes b No
10. If Yes, specific reason
a. Personal problems c. Environmental Problems
b. Technical problem
11. The major reasons for the Work place accident
a. Work Based b. Worker Based
12. The major reasons for Work related accident that occur in the organization
a. Improper lighting e. Polluted work place
b. Unsafe & careless house keeping
c. Improper Ventilation f. Inadequate Safety Devices
d. If others mention
13 what are the worker based causes for the accident that occur in the accident
a. Lack of adequate skill e. Disturbed mental condition
b. Neglecting safety devices f. Unsafe speed
c. Unsafe material handling
d. Others Mention
III. EMPLOYEES COMMITMENT
14. Is Good safety& health measures to work and individual recognition is need
for improving work efficiency
a. Strongly agree d. Disagree
b. Agree e .Strongly disagree
c. Neither agree nor disagree
15. At the time of joining, your awareness level of Employees safety & health measures?
a. Very High b. High c. Low d. Very low e. None
16. At present, do you aware of Employees Safety & Health measures?
a. Yes b. No
17. If Yes, through which
a. Motion Pictures c. colleagues
b. written brouchers d. Manager in person
18. Is your work load is acceptable in the organization?
a. Yes b. No
19. If No, to what extent
a. Heavy b. very Heavy
20. How would you rate your job?
a. Challenging b. Interesting c. Creative d. poor
IV. MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT
21. Do you receive support from the management regarding Employees Safety & Health?
a. Yes b. No
22. Do you get enough training from the company regarding Employees Safety & Health?
a. Yes b. No
23. Are the company’s Safety & Health policies flexible and acceptable to you?
a. Yes b. No
24. If No, specify reason
25. Are you interested to participate in suggestion scheme in Employees safety & Health?
a. Yes b. No
26. Your level of participation in the implementation of Safety & Health Procedures in your
organization
a. Very High b. High c. Low d. Very low e. None
27. The frequency of safety training conducted in the organization
a. Weekly b. Monthly c. Yearly
28. If so,
a. Once b. Twice c. Thrice
29. Do you have frequent inspection by the top management?
a. Yes b. No
30. How do you feel about the approach from the organization?
a. Flexible c. People oriented
b. Transparent d. Product oriented
V. MEASURES
31 Do you have enough First aid facilities in case of accident?
a. Yes b. No
32. Find the reasons for Stress relief measures
a. Reasonable hours of work
b. Rest Pauses or break in working hours
c. Holidays and leave with pay
d. Appreciating employees for their work
33. Does the company provide recreational facilities?
a. Yes b. No
34. If Yes, What type of facilities
a. T.V b. News papers or magazines c. Light music
d. Sports
35. The frequency of accidents is high in the organization during
a .First Shift b .Second Shift c .Third Shift d. None
36. Do you think the particular type of accident that occur frequently
in your work place
a. Yes b. No
37. If Yes Specify reason
38. Are they conducting safety contest?
a. Yes b. No
39. Is your practicing method of work is based on Ergonomics (designing tools and work
based on the capabilities & limitation of work)?
a. Yes b. No
40. Are they giving counseling for the employees?
a. Yes b. No
41. Is your organization carefully conducting pre- employment and post- employment medical
check up?
a. Yes b. No
Homework Help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Math homework helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Research Paper helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Algebra Helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Calculus Helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Accounting helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Paper Helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Writing Helphttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Online Tutorhttps://www.homeworkping.com/ Online Tutoringhttps://www.homeworkping.com/