9. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT QUALITATIVE CSA - SKIN IRRITATION AND EYE DAMAGE Worker The human health hazard assessment of alkyl ethersulfates (AES) resulted in the identification of skin and eye irritation as the leading health effect. All alkyl ethersulfates of the category are classified for eye damage (H318/R41) and skin irritation (H315/R38). Specific concentration limits for eye damage were established ≥5 and <10% (irritating to eyes). The generic concentration limit for skin irritants is 10% according to CLP and 20% according to DPD. The available data for this effect do not provide quantitative dose-response information; thus, no short-term local DNELs have been derived for dermal exposure and no quantitative risk assessment was performed. Exposure assessment and risk characterisation are performed on a qualitative basis. The purpose of a qualitative risk characterization is to assess "the likelihood that effects are avoided when implementing the exposure scenario…" (REACH Annex 1, Section 6.5). This qualitative Chemical Safety Assessment (CSA) approach aims to reduce/avoid contact when there is no basis for setting a DNEL or DMEL for a certain human health adverse effect, i.e. when the available data for this adverse effect do not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exist toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative risk characterization. Implementation of risk management measures (RMMs) and operational conditions (OCs) need to be proportional to the degree of concern for the health hazard presented by the substance. Skin irritation is considered a low hazard while eye damage represents a moderate hazard (ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Part E; November 2012). Thus, alkyl ethersulfates are allocated to the moderate hazard category for a qualitative exposure assessment. Exposures should be controlled to at least the levels that represent an acceptable level of risk, i.e. implementation of the chosen RMMs will ensure that the likelihood of an event occurring due to the hazard of the substance is negligible, and the risk is considered to be controlled to a level of no concern. As qualitative approach dermal exposure should be minimised by appropriate RMMs. Personal protective equipment (PPE) such as protective clothing, closely fitting goggles and chemical-resistant gloves are required in all parts of the facility where contact with product is possible. Further technical and organisational measures apply, such as good general ventilation, good documentation of substance-handling procedures, training for workers on good practice, good standard of personal hygiene, special procedures for cleaning and maintenance etc. When these RMMs and OCs are applied, the risk for dermal exposure is sufficiently controlled. Where activities may lead to aerosol release (e.g. spraying of concentrated AES), additional skin and eye protection measures such as impervious suits and face shields as well as respiratory protection are required. Handling and storage risk management measures that are generally identified for skin and eye irritation are given in the table below.
659
Embed
9. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT - Clariant · 9. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT QUALITATIVE CSA - SKIN IRRITATION AND EYE DAMAGE Worker The human health hazard assessment of alkyl ethersulfates (AES)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Worker The human health hazard assessment of alkyl ethersulfates (AES) resulted in the identification of skin and eye irritation as the leading health effect. All alkyl ethersulfates of the category are classified for eye damage (H318/R41) and skin irritation (H315/R38). Specific concentration limits for eye damage were established ≥5 and <10% (irritating to eyes). The generic concentration limit for skin irritants is 10% according to CLP and 20% according to DPD. The available data for this effect do not provide quantitative dose-response information; thus, no short-term local DNELs have been derived for dermal exposure and no quantitative risk assessment was performed. Exposure assessment and risk characterisation are performed on a qualitative basis.
The purpose of a qualitative risk characterization is to assess "the likelihood that effects are avoided when implementing the exposure scenario…" (REACH Annex 1, Section 6.5). This qualitative Chemical Safety Assessment (CSA) approach aims to reduce/avoid contact when there is no basis for setting a DNEL or DMEL for a certain human health adverse effect, i.e. when the available data for this adverse effect do not provide quantitative dose-response information, but there exist toxicity data appropriate to allow a qualitative risk characterization. Implementation of risk management measures (RMMs) and operational conditions (OCs) need to be proportional to the degree of concern for the health hazard presented by the substance. Skin irritation is considered a low hazard while eye damage represents a moderate hazard (ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Part E; November 2012). Thus, alkyl ethersulfates are allocated to the moderate hazard category for a qualitative exposure assessment. Exposures should be controlled to at least the levels that represent an acceptable level of risk, i.e. implementation of the chosen RMMs will ensure that the likelihood of an event occurring due to the hazard of the substance is negligible, and the risk is considered to be controlled to a level of no concern.
As qualitative approach dermal exposure should be minimised by appropriate RMMs. Personal protective equipment (PPE) such as protective clothing, closely fitting goggles and chemical-resistant gloves are required in all parts of the facility where contact with product is possible. Further technical and organisational measures apply, such as good general ventilation, good documentation of substance-handling procedures, training for workers on good practice, good standard of personal hygiene, special procedures for cleaning and maintenance etc. When these RMMs and OCs are applied, the risk for dermal exposure is sufficiently controlled. Where activities may lead to aerosol release (e.g. spraying of concentrated AES), additional skin and eye protection measures such as impervious suits and face shields as well as respiratory protection are required.
Handling and storage risk management measures that are generally identified for skin and eye irritation are given in the table below.
Components of the Qualitative Risk Assessment to prevent skin and eye contact Examples of relevant Precautionary (P) Statements and Response (R) Phrases
Components of the Qualitative Risk Assessment
Prevention: Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on
clothing (P262) Wear protective gloves/protective
clothing/eye protection/face protection (P280)
Avoid contact with skin and eyes (S24/25)
In case of contact with eyes rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice (S26)
Wear suitable gloves and eye/face protection (S37/39)
Response: IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with
water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing (P305 + P351 + P338)
If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention (P337 + P313)
Avoid direct contact with product; Wear protective gloves and suitable eye protection (chemical
goggles) at all times when handling the substance Where activities may lead to aerosol release e.g. spraying of
concentrated AES or handling of concentrated dusty AES, then additional skin and eye protection measures such as impervious suits and face shields as well as respiratory protection are required.
Avoid splashes and spills; Avoidance of contact with contaminated tools and objects; Clean up contamination/spills as soon as they occur; Implementation of basic standards of occupational hygiene; Minimise number of staff exposed; Minimise number of manual phases; Regular cleaning of equipment and work area; Ensure a good standard of general ventilation; Ensure suitable management/supervision is in place to check
that the RMMs in place are being used correctly and OCs followed;
Train staff on good practice to prevent / minimise exposures and to report any eye problems that may develop;
Adopt good standards of personal hygiene.
A review of these RMMs indicates that, if the user complies with the generic statements, workers´ exposure to AES will be negligible and risks due to skin and eye irritation can be considered to be adequately controlled.
General population The general population will not come into contact with the neat substances. According to a voluntary industry program carrying out Human and Environmental Risk Assessments (HERA, 2003) the maximum concentration of AES in consumer products is almost 30%. As described above, skin and eye irritation of AES according to the classification criteria laid down in Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and Directive 67/548/EEC, respectively are not expected below concentrations of 5%. Eye irritation upon accidental spilling of AES containing products is expected to represent the scenario of concern for the general population. In case the concentration of 5% AES is exceeded within the respective consumer exposure scenario, e.g. during use of hand dish washing products, toilet cleaners or laundry liquids, suited risk management measures are in place to ensure safe use. Suited risk management measures may comprise of increased viscosity of products in order to avoid splashes and spills during handling, the use of completed dosing solutions (including tableting of powders), child-resistant fastenings or further product-integrated measures, like increase of particle size to decrease the inhalable fraction of powders. The listed risk management measures are however not comprehensive and further RMMs suited to minimise dermal exposure may be applied. In addition, products containing higher concentrations of AES are commonly used after dilution in water. Handling of diluted AES however is not of concern regarding skin irritation and eye damage. Skin contact to products containing higher concentrations of AES will in general be limited to short exposure periods before being washed off (e.g. hand dishwashing products). Also co-formulation with other surfactants decreases the irritating potential of surfactants when compared to the neat surfactant. Co-formulation results in a lowered critical micelle concentration and subsequently in formation of micelles what in turn reduces the irritating potential when compared to the neat alkyl ethersulfate. This was reported for various surfactants like alkyl sulfates but also alkyl ethersulfates (Dillarstone & Paye, 1993, Effendy & Maibach, 2006; Paye et al, 2006). The low eye irritating potential of AES containing consumer products is also reflected by the long experience with those products. Although eye irritation may occur upon accidental spilling of AES containing products into the eye, this irritation is generally reversible in nature and thus does not represent a serious hazard to the general population. This is supported by poison control center data evaluated within the HERA report: “…Accidental eye contact with AES containing products will at worst result in a transient irritation which heals within a few days with no irreversible effects to the eye. Nevertheless, in case of such an accident, the eyes should be rinsed immediately with plenty of water.” Thus, the irritating potential of AES in products considered for consumer uses are sufficiently controlled via a
variety of risk management measures and available data proved their efficiency. This conclusion is also supported by the HERA report. Nevertheless, it should be stated to avoid contact with the eyes and to flush eyes with plenty of water in case of accidental spilling. Dillarstone & Paye 1993:
Detergents. In Irritant Dermatitis, Chew A-L and Maibach HI, (Eds.), Springer 2006 HERA report 2003:
http://www.heraproject.com/files/1-HH-04-HERA%20AES%20HH%20web%20wd.pdf Paye et al. 2006:
Antagonisms between surfactants: The case of laundry detergents. Tenside Surf. Det. 43, 290-294.
Secondary poisoning: Based on the available information, there is no indication of a bioaccumulation potential and, hence, secondary poisoning is not considered relevant Information on the exposure assessment tool Exposure scenarios 9.1 to 9.x have been calculated using EasyTRA 4.0.0. EasyTRA uses algorithms on the basis of the latest versions of the ECHA REACH Guidance chapters R12 (as of March 2010), R14, R15, and R16 (as of October 2012) and EUSES®. EasyTRA is a graphical user interface which works in compliance with ECETOC® Targeted Risk Assessment 3 (as of July 2012; for detailed information see ECETOC Technical Report No. 114) for the calculation of worker and consumer exposure and complies with EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a for the environmental exposure (see ECHA REACH Guidance chapter R16.6.2 ). Results obtained by EasyTRA are routinely validated against the results obtained by performing the same calculations with the original tools. Details on used Targeted Risk Assessment: Exposure assessment in EasyTRA follows a tiered approach, offering increasingly sophisticated refinements at later tiers to adapt the scenarios to real-life situations. The Tier 1 assessments (reduced number of parameters, conservative results) refer to ECETOC TRA v3, 2012 for the consumer, worker and environmental exposure assessment. The Tier 2 assessments refer to ConsExpo 4.1 model for consumer exposure assessment or EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a for the calculation of environmental exposure (EUSES), including full access to all EUSES parameters as a third step in the refinement. EasyTRA can also perform a qualitative assessment, following ECHA Guidance Part E or externally calculated values can be considered. EasyTRA offers the options to generate user defined spERCs, article and product categories as a first refinement in the exposure calculations, before switching to higher Tier tools. The following modifications are possible for the worker exposure assessment, that are already suggested in the ECETOC TRA guidance document TR114: Factor for Peak exposure, use of the exact concentration instead of ECETOCs category approach, and use of the exact process duration instead of ECETOCs category approach. In addition, the exact value for the effectiveness of specific types of respiratory protection can be entered. Values originate from EU standards DIN EN136, EN140, EN143, EN149, EN12941, EN12942. All deviations require mandatory justifications, which are documented in the CSR to assure full transparency of the calculations and underlying assumptions.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 49
9.2 Scenario 2: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1003a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.2 ff. Table 3. Description of ES 2
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1003a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 24A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
9.2.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 50
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
Product characteristics
Physical state solid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,980 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 80 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.3 Scenario 3: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1003b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 51
An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.3 ff. Table 4. Description of ES 3
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1003b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 24A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
9.3.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
Product characteristics
Physical state solid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 52
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,980 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 80 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.4 Scenario 4: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M1) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure. Industrial setting. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.4 ff. Table 5. Description of ES 4
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M1)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 1
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
9.4.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 53
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.5 Scenario 5: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed, continous process with occasional controlled exposure (e.g. sampling). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M2) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed, continous process with occasional controlled exposure (e.g. sampling). Industrial setting.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 54
The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.5 ff. Table 6. Description of ES 5
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed, continous process with occasional controlled exposure (e.g. sampling). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M2)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.5.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 55
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.6 Scenario 6: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M3) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation. Industrial setting. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.6 ff. Table 7. Description of ES 6
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M3)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 3
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 3 - Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation)
9.6.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 56
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 3 - Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation)
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.7 Scenario 7: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M4) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises. Industrial setting. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.7 ff.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 57
Table 8. Description of ES 7
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M4)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.7.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 58
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.8 Scenario 8: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Mixing or blending in batch processes for formulation of preparations and articles (multistage and/or significant contact). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M5) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Mixing or blending in batch processes for formulation of preparations and articles (multistage and/or significant contact). Industrial setting. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.8 ff. Table 9. Description of ES 8
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Mixing or blending in batch processes for formulation of preparations and articles (multistage and/or significant contact). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M5)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 5
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 5 - Mixing or blending in batch processes (multistage and/or significant contact)
9.8.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 59
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 5 - Mixing or blending in batch processes (multistage and/or significant contact)
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.9 Scenario 9: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation (charging/discharging) from/to vessels/large containers at dedicated facilities. (A.I.S.E. M6) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation (charging/discharging) from/to vessels/large containers at dedicated facilities..
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 60
The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.9 ff. Table 10. Description of ES 9
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation (charging/discharging) from/to vessels/large containers at dedicated facilities. (A.I.S.E. M6)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 8B
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
9.9.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 61
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.10 Scenario 10: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation into small containers (dedicated filling line, including weighing). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M7) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation into small containers (dedicated filling line, including weighing). Industrial setting. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.10 ff. Table 11. Description of ES 10
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation into small containers (dedicated filling line, including weighing). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M7)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 9
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 9 - Transfer of chemicals into small containers (dedicated filling line)
9.10.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 62
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 9 - Transfer of chemicals into small containers (dedicated filling line)
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.11 Scenario 11: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelettisation. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M8) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelettisation. Industrial setting.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 63
The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.11 ff. Table 12. Description of ES 11
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelettisation. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M8)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 14
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 14 - Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelletisation
9.11.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 250 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 41.75 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 14 - Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelletisation
Product characteristics
Physical state solid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 64
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.12 Scenario 12: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use as a laboratory reagent (A.I.S.E. M9) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use as a laboratory reagent. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.12 ff. Table 13. Description of ES 12
Free short title Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use as a laboratory reagent (A.I.S.E. M9)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 2; PROC 15
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 2 Formulation of preparations
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
9.12.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 2
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 1.67E4 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.020 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0.010 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 36.74 %
STP yes
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 65
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Name of contributing scenario 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.13 Scenario 13: Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Automatic process (AISE-P101) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.13 ff. Table 14. Description of ES 13
Free short title Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Automatic process (AISE-P101)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 66
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.13.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 67
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.14 Scenario 14: Industrial use of Laundry products Conditioner (softner/starch); Automatic process (AISE-P104) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Laundry products Conditioner (softner/starch); Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.14 ff. Table 15. Description of ES 14
Free short title Industrial use of Laundry products Conditioner (softner/starch); Automatic process (AISE-P104)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.14.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.15 Scenario 15: Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Automatic process (AISE-P107) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.15 ff. Table 16. Description of ES 15
Free short title Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Automatic process (AISE-P107)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.15.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 69
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 70
9.16 Scenario 16: Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Automatic process (AISE-P110) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.16 ff. Table 17. Description of ES 16
Free short title Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Automatic process (AISE-P110)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.16.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 71
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.17 Scenario 17: Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P707a, AISE-P707b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.17 ff. Table 18. Description of ES 17
Free short title Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P707a, AISE-P707b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.17.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 72
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.17.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 73
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.18 Scenario 18: Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P708a, AISE-P708b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 74
This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.18 ff. Table 19. Description of ES 18
Free short title Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P708a, AISE-P708b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.18.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 75
9.18.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 77
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.19 Scenario 19: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P709a, AISE-P709b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.19 ff. Table 20. Description of ES 19
Free short title Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P709a, AISE-P709b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 78
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.19.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.19.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 79
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 80
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 81
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.20 Scenario 20: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process (AISE-P710a, AISE-P710b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.20 ff. Table 21. Description of ES 20
Free short title Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process (AISE-P710a, AISE-P710b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 83
Duration of activity 16 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 16 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 16 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 16 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 85
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.21 Scenario 21: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P711a, AISE-P711b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.21 ff. Table 22. Description of ES 21
Free short title Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P711a, AISE-P711b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 16 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 87
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 300 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.22 Scenario 22: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P712a, AISE-P712b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.22 ff.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 88
Table 23. Description of ES 22
Free short title Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P712a, AISE-P712b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.22.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.22.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 89
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 90
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 91
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.23 Scenario 23: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaning; semi automatic (AISE-P713) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaning; semi automatic. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.23 ff. Table 24. Description of ES 23
Free short title Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaning; semi automatic (AISE-P713)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.23.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 92
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.24 Scenario 24: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P714a, AISE-P714b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 93
This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.24 ff. Table 25. Description of ES 24
Free short title Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P714a, AISE-P714b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 16 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 95
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 300 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.25 Scenario 25: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Cleaning In place (CIP) process (AISE-P801) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Cleaning In place (CIP) process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.25 ff. Table 26. Description of ES 25
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Cleaning In place (CIP) process (AISE-P801)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 1
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
9.25.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 96
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.26 Scenario 26: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 97
Process cleaner; Semi closed cleaning process (AISE-P802) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Semi closed cleaning process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.26 ff. Table 27. Description of ES 26
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Semi closed cleaning process (AISE-P802)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.26.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 98
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.27 Scenario 27: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic spray process (AISE-P803) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic spray process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.27 ff. Table 28. Description of ES 27
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic spray process (AISE-P803)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.27.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 99
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.28 Scenario 28: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic drip and brush process (AISE-P804)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 100
This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic drip and brush process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.28 ff. Table 29. Description of ES 28
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic drip and brush process (AISE-P804)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.28.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 101
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.29 Scenario 29: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Defoaming product; Automatic process (AISE-P805) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Defoaming product; Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.29 ff. Table 30. Description of ES 29
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Defoaming product; Automatic process (AISE-P805)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 1
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
9.29.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 102
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.30 Scenario 30: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic with venting process (AISE-P806) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 103
environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic with venting process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.30 ff. Table 31. Description of ES 30
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic with venting process (AISE-P806)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.30.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 104
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 95 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.31 Scenario 31: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic without venting process (AISE-P807) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic without venting process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.31 ff. Table 32. Description of ES 31
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic without venting process (AISE-P807)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.31.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 105
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.32 Scenario 32: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Animal housing care; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P809) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 106
The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Animal housing care; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.32 ff. Table 33. Description of ES 32
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Animal housing care; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P809)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.32.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 107
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.33 Scenario 33: Industrial use of pharmacos products Disinfection product; Semi-automatic process (AISE-P810) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of pharmacos products Disinfection product; Semi-automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.33 ff. Table 34. Description of ES 33
Free short title Industrial use of pharmacos products Disinfection product; Semi-automatic process (AISE-P810)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.33.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 108
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 240 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.34 Scenario 34: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Disinfection product; Fogging and gassing Semi-automatic process (AISE-P811) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Disinfection product; Fogging and gassing Semi-automatic process.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 109
The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.34 ff. Table 35. Description of ES 34
Free short title Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Disinfection product; Fogging and gassing Semi-automatic process (AISE-P811)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.34.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 110
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.35 Scenario 35: Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Process water (AISE-P903) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Process water. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.35 ff. Table 36. Description of ES 35
Free short title Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Process water (AISE-P903)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.35.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 111
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.36 Scenario 36: Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Drink and pool water (AISE-P904) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Drink and pool water. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.36 ff. Table 37. Description of ES 36
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 112
Free short title Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Drink and pool water (AISE-P904)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.36.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 113
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.37 Scenario 37: Industrial use of Water treatment Products Sanitation agent; Waste water (AISE-P905) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Water treatment Products Sanitation agent; Waste water. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.37 ff. Table 38. Description of ES 37
Free short title Industrial use of Water treatment Products Sanitation agent; Waste water (AISE-P905)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.37.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 114
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.38 Scenario 38: Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process (AISE-P906) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.38 ff. Table 39. Description of ES 38
Free short title Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process (AISE-P906)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 115
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.38.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 116
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.39 Scenario 39: Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process (AISE-P907) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.39 ff. Table 40. Description of ES 39
Free short title Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process (AISE-P907)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.39.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 117
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.40 Scenario 40: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1001a, AISE-P1001b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.40 ff. Table 41. Description of ES 40
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1001a, AISE-P1001b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 118
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2, 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.40.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
9.40.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 119
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 120
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.41 Scenario 41: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1001a, AISE-P1001b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.41 ff. Table 42. Description of ES 41
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1001a, AISE-P1001b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2, 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.41.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 121
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
9.41.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 122
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.42 Scenario 42: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1002a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 123
described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.42 ff. Table 43. Description of ES 42
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1002a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 17
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 17 - Lubrication at high energy conditions and in partly open process
9.42.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 17 - Lubrication at high energy conditions and in partly open process
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 124
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.43 Scenario 43: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1002b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.43 ff. Table 44. Description of ES 43
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1002b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 17
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 17 - Lubrication at high energy conditions and in partly open process
9.43.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 125
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 17 - Lubrication at high energy conditions and in partly open process
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.44 Scenario 44: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 126
(AISE-P1003a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.44 ff. Table 45. Description of ES 44
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1003a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 24A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
9.44.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
Product characteristics
Physical state solid
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 127
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,980 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 80 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.45 Scenario 45: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1003b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.45 ff. Table 46. Description of ES 45
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1003b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 24A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
9.45.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 128
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 24a - High (mechanical) energy work-up of substances bound in materials and/or articles - pt < mp - Low Fugacity
Product characteristics
Physical state solid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,980 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 80 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.46 Scenario 46: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1004a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 129
The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.46 ff. Table 47. Description of ES 46
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1004a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.46.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 130
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.47 Scenario 47: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Nickel (AISE-P1004b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.47 ff. Table 48. Description of ES 47
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Nickel (AISE-P1004b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.47.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 131
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.48 Scenario 48: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1005a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 132
The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.48 ff. Table 49. Description of ES 48
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1005a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.48.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 133
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.49 Scenario 49: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1005b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.49 ff. Table 50. Description of ES 49
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1005b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.49.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 134
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.50 Scenario 50: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1006a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 135
An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.50 ff. Table 51. Description of ES 50
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1006a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.50.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 136
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.51 Scenario 51: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process (AISE-P1006b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.51 ff. Table 52. Description of ES 51
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process (AISE-P1006b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.51.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 137
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.52 Scenario 52: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium,
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 138
Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1007a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.52 ff. Table 53. Description of ES 52
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1007a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.52.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 139
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.53 Scenario 53: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1007b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.53 ff. Table 54. Description of ES 53
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1007b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.53.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 140
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 141
9.54 Scenario 54: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1008a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.54 ff. Table 55. Description of ES 54
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1008a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.54.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 142
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.55 Scenario 55: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P1008b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.55 ff. Table 56. Description of ES 55
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P1008b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 143
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.55.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 144
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.56 Scenario 56: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1009a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.56 ff. Table 57. Description of ES 56
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1009a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.56.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 145
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.57 Scenario 57: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Nickel (AISE-P1009b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.57 ff. Table 58. Description of ES 57
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Nickel (AISE-P1009b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 146
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.57.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 147
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.58 Scenario 58: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1010a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.58 ff. Table 59. Description of ES 58
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1010a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.58.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 148
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.59 Scenario 59: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Nickel (AISE-P1010b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Nickel. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.59 ff. Table 60. Description of ES 59
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 149
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Nickel (AISE-P1010b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.59.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 150
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.60 Scenario 60: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1011a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.60 ff. Table 61. Description of ES 60
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1011a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.60.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 5 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 151
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1a.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Nickel
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.61 Scenario 61: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Nickel (AISE-P1011b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Nickel.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 152
The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.61 ff. Table 62. Description of ES 61
Free short title Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Nickel (AISE-P1011b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.61.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 1 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 5.1b.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Me-salts in conversion coating - Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 153
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.62 Scenario 62: Industrial use of Quality control Laboratory Reagents (AISE-P1250) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Industrial use of Quality control Laboratory Reagents. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.62 ff. Table 63. Description of ES 62
Free short title Industrial use of Quality control Laboratory Reagents (AISE-P1250)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 15
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
9.62.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 154
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 40 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.63 Scenario 63: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Semi automatic process (AISE-P102) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Semi automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 155
scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.63 ff. Table 64. Description of ES 63
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Semi automatic process (AISE-P102)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 1
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
9.63.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.63.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 156
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.64 Scenario 64: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Manual process (AISE-P103) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.64 ff. Table 65. Description of ES 64
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Manual process (AISE-P103)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.64.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 157
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.64.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.65 Scenario 65: Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process (AISE-P105) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.65 ff. Table 66. Description of ES 65
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process (AISE-P105)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 1, 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 158
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.65.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.65.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 159
Respiratory protection no
9.65.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.66 Scenario 66: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process (AISE-P108) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.66 ff. Table 67. Description of ES 66
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process (AISE-P108)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8B; PROC 1, 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8b Wide dispersive indoor use of reactive substances in open systems
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 160
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.66.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8B
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 5.479 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.100 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 2 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.200 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
9.66.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.66.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 161
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.67 Scenario 67: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process (AISE-P111) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.67 ff. Table 68. Description of ES 67
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process (AISE-P111)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8B; PROC 1, 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8b Wide dispersive indoor use of reactive substances in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.67.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8B
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 162
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 5.479 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0.100 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 2 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.200 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
9.67.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.67.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 163
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.68 Scenario 68: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Manual process (AISE-P112) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.68 ff. Table 69. Description of ES 68
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Manual process (AISE-P112)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.68.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 164
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.68.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.69 Scenario 69: Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process (AISE-P113a, AISE-P113b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover;
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 165
Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.69 ff. Table 70. Description of ES 69
Free short title Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process (AISE-P113a, AISE-P113b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.69.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.69.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 166
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.69.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.69.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 167
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.70 Scenario 70: Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Manual process (AISE-P201) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.70 ff. Table 71. Description of ES 70
Free short title Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Manual process (AISE-P201)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.70.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 168
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.70.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.71 Scenario 71: Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash and rinse aid product; Automatic process (AISE-P202) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash and rinse aid product; Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 169
scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.71 ff. Table 72. Description of ES 71
Free short title Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash and rinse aid product; Automatic process (AISE-P202)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.71.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.71.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 2 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 170
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.72 Scenario 72: Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P203) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.72 ff. Table 73. Description of ES 72
Free short title Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P203)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 1, 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.72.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 171
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.72.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.72.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 172
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.73 Scenario 73: Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P204) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.73 ff. Table 74. Description of ES 73
Free short title Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P204)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 1, 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.73.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 173
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.73.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.73.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 174
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.74 Scenario 74: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P301) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.74 ff. Table 75. Description of ES 74
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P301)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.74.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 175
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.74.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.75 Scenario 75: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process (AISE-P302a, AISE-P302b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.75 ff. Table 76. Description of ES 75
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process (AISE-P302a, AISE-P302b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 176
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.75.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.75.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 177
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.75.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.75.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 178
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.76 Scenario 76: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P303) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.76 ff. Table 77. Description of ES 76
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P303)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.76.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 179
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.76.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.77 Scenario 77: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P304a, AISE-P304b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.77 ff. Table 78. Description of ES 77
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P304a, AISE-P304b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 180
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.77.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.77.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 181
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.77.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.77.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 182
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.78 Scenario 78: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P305) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.78 ff. Table 79. Description of ES 78
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P305)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.78.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 183
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.78.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.79 Scenario 79: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P306a, AISE-P306b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.79 ff. Table 80. Description of ES 79
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P306a, AISE-P306b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 184
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.79.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.79.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 185
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.79.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.79.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 186
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.80 Scenario 80: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Manual process (AISE-P307) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.80 ff. Table 81. Description of ES 80
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Manual process (AISE-P307)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.80.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 187
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.80.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.81 Scenario 81: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process (AISE-P308a, AISE-P308b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.81 ff. Table 82. Description of ES 81
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process (AISE-P308a, AISE-P308b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 188
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.81.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.81.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 189
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.81.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.81.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 190
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.82 Scenario 82: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Periodic cleaning by dipping (AISE-P309) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Periodic cleaning by dipping. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.82 ff. Table 83. Description of ES 82
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Periodic cleaning by dipping (AISE-P309)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.82.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 191
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.82.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.83 Scenario 83: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P310) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.83 ff. Table 84. Description of ES 83
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 192
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P310)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.83.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.83.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 193
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.84 Scenario 84: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P311a, AISE-P311b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.84 ff. Table 85. Description of ES 84
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P311a, AISE-P311b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10, 11
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying
9.84.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 194
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.84.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.84.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 195
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.84.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.85 Scenario 85: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P312) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 196
An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.85 ff. Table 86. Description of ES 85
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P312)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.85.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.85.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 197
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.86 Scenario 86: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P313a, AISE-P313b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.86 ff. Table 87. Description of ES 86
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P313a, AISE-P313b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.86.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 198
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.86.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.86.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 199
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.86.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.87 Scenario 87: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Manual process (AISE-P314) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 200
The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.87 ff. Table 88. Description of ES 87
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Manual process (AISE-P314)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.87.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.87.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 201
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.88 Scenario 88: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process (AISE-P315a, AISE-P315b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.88 ff. Table 89. Description of ES 88
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process (AISE-P315a, AISE-P315b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.88.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 202
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.88.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.88.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 203
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.88.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.89 Scenario 89: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Metal cleaning agent (including silver and copper polishes); Manual process (AISE-P316) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 204
environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Metal cleaning agent (including silver and copper polishes); Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.89 ff. Table 90. Description of ES 89
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Metal cleaning agent (including silver and copper polishes); Manual process (AISE-P316)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.89.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.89.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 205
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.90 Scenario 90: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Wet wipes; Manual process (AISE-P317) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Wet wipes; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.90 ff. Table 91. Description of ES 90
Free short title Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Wet wipes; Manual process (AISE-P317)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.90.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 206
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.90.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.91 Scenario 91: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P401) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.91 ff.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 207
Table 92. Description of ES 91
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P401)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.91.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.91.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 208
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.92 Scenario 92: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P402a, AISE-P402b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.92 ff. Table 93. Description of ES 92
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P402a, AISE-P402b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.92.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 209
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.92.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.92.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 210
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.92.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.93 Scenario 93: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P403a, AISE-P403b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.93 ff. Table 94. Description of ES 93
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 211
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P403a, AISE-P403b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.93.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.93.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 212
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.93.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.93.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 213
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.94 Scenario 94: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Manual process (AISE-P404) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.94 ff. Table 95. Description of ES 94
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Manual process (AISE-P404)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.94.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 214
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.94.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.95 Scenario 95: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P405) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.95 ff. Table 96. Description of ES 95
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 215
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P405)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.95.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.95.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 216
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.96 Scenario 96: Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Manual process (AISE-P406) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.96 ff. Table 97. Description of ES 96
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Manual process (AISE-P406)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.96.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 217
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.96.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.97 Scenario 97: Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P407) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.97 ff. Table 98. Description of ES 97
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P407)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 218
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.97.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.97.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 219
Respiratory protection no
9.98 Scenario 98: Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P408a, AISE-P408b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.98 ff. Table 99. Description of ES 98
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P408a, AISE-P408b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.98.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 220
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.98.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.98.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 221
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.98.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.99 Scenario 99: Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P409) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.99 ff. Table 100. Description of ES 99
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P409)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 222
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.99.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.99.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 223
Respiratory protection no
9.100 Scenario 100: Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P410) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.100 ff. Table 101. Description of ES 100
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P410)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.100.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.100.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 224
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.101 Scenario 101: Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process (AISE-P411a, AISE-P411b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.101 ff. Table 102. Description of ES 101
Free short title Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process (AISE-P411a, AISE-P411b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 225
9.101.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.101.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.101.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 226
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.101.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 227
9.102 Scenario 102: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Manual process (AISE-P601) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.102 ff. Table 103. Description of ES 102
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Manual process (AISE-P601)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.102.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.102.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 228
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.103 Scenario 103: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P602a, AISE-P602b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.103 ff. Table 104. Description of ES 103
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P602a, AISE-P602b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.103.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 229
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.103.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.103.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 230
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 25 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 25%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.103.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.104 Scenario 104: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 231
product; Manual process (AISE-P603) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.104 ff. Table 105. Description of ES 104
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Manual process (AISE-P603)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.104.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.104.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 232
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.105 Scenario 105: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P604a, AISE-P604b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.105 ff. Table 106. Description of ES 105
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P604a, AISE-P604b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.105.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 233
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.105.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.105.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 234
Concentration in substance 25 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 25%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.105.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.106 Scenario 106: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P605)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 235
This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.106 ff. Table 107. Description of ES 106
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P605)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.106.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.106.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 2 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 236
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.107 Scenario 107: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain unblocker; Manual process (AISE-P606) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain unblocker; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.107 ff. Table 108. Description of ES 107
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain unblocker; Manual process (AISE-P606)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.107.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 237
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.107.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.108 Scenario 108: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P607) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain cleaner; Manual
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 238
process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.108 ff. Table 109. Description of ES 108
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P607)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.108.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.108.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 239
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.109 Scenario 109: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care ; Manual process (AISE-P608) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care ; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.109 ff. Table 110. Description of ES 109
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care ; Manual process (AISE-P608)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.109.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 240
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.109.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.110 Scenario 110: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P609a, AISE-P609b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.110 ff. Table 111. Description of ES 110
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 241
Free short title Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P609a, AISE-P609b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.110.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.110.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 242
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.110.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 25 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 25%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.110.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 31)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 243
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.111 Scenario 111: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P701a, AISE-P701b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.111 ff. Table 112. Description of ES 111
Free short title Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P701a, AISE-P701b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.111.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 244
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.111.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.111.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 245
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.111.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.112 Scenario 112: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process (AISE-P702a, AISE-P702b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 246
scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.112 ff. Table 113. Description of ES 112
Free short title Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process (AISE-P702a, AISE-P702b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying
9.112.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.112.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 247
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.112.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.112.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 248
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.113 Scenario 113: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process (AISE-P703a, AISE-P703b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.113 ff. Table 114. Description of ES 113
Free short title Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process (AISE-P703a, AISE-P703b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.113.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 249
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.113.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.113.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 250
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.113.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.114 Scenario 114: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P704a, AISE-P704b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 251
scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.114 ff. Table 115. Description of ES 114
Free short title Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P704a, AISE-P704b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.114.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.114.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 252
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.114.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.114.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 253
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.115 Scenario 115: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P705) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.115 ff. Table 116. Description of ES 115
Free short title Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P705)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.115.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 254
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.115.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.116 Scenario 116: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P706a, AISE-P706b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.116 ff. Table 117. Description of ES 116
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 255
Free short title Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P706a, AISE-P706b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.116.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.116.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 256
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.116.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 10 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 10%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.116.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 257
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.117 Scenario 117: Professional Use of pharmacos products Animal care; Manual process (AISE-P808) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of pharmacos products Animal care; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.117 ff. Table 118. Description of ES 117
Free short title Professional Use of pharmacos products Animal care; Manual process (AISE-P808)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.117.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 258
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.117.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.118 Scenario 118: Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process (AISE-P901a, AISE-P901b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.118 ff. Table 119. Description of ES 118
Free short title Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process (AISE-P901a, AISE-P901b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 259
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8D; PROC 11
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8d Wide dispersive outdoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8d Wide dispersive outdoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying
9.118.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8D
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.118.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8D
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 260
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.118.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.118.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 261
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.119 Scenario 119: Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process (AISE-P902a, AISE-P902b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.119 ff. Table 120. Description of ES 119
Free short title Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process (AISE-P902a, AISE-P902b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8D; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8d Wide dispersive outdoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8d Wide dispersive outdoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.119.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8D
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 262
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.119.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8D
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.119.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 263
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.119.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.119.5 Contributing Scenario (5) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 264
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.119.6 Contributing Scenario (6) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.120 Scenario 120: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process (AISE-P1101) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 265
environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.120 ff. Table 121. Description of ES 120
Free short title Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process (AISE-P1101)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 1, 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.120.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.120.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 266
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.120.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.121 Scenario 121: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Dipping process (AISE-P1102) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Dipping
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 267
process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.121 ff. Table 122. Description of ES 121
Free short title Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Dipping process (AISE-P1102)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.121.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.121.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 268
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.122 Scenario 122: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Manual process (AISE-P1103) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Manual process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.122 ff. Table 123. Description of ES 122
Free short title Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Manual process (AISE-P1103)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.122.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 269
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.122.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.123 Scenario 123: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P1104a, AISE-P1104b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.123 ff. Table 124. Description of ES 123
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 270
Free short title Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P1104a, AISE-P1104b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11, 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.123.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.123.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 271
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.123.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 35 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 35%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.123.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 1 - 4 hours
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 272
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.124 Scenario 124: Laboratory Use Laboratory Reagents (sampling cleaning product for dosage, pH measurement, titration of chlorine, water hardness, etc…) (AISE-P1200) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Laboratory Use Laboratory Reagents (sampling cleaning product for dosage, pH measurement, titration of chlorine, water hardness, etc…). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.124 ff. Table 125. Description of ES 124
Free short title Laboratory Use Laboratory Reagents (sampling cleaning product for dosage, pH measurement, titration of chlorine, water hardness, etc…) (AISE-P1200)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 15
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
9.124.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 273
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.124.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 15 (PC 21)
Name of contributing scenario 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity >4 hours (default)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.125 Scenario 125: Professional Use of Hand Cleaners Professional Hand Cleaner /skin desinfectants (AISE-P1300) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Hand Cleaners Professional Hand Cleaner /skin desinfectants. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.125 ff. Table 126. Description of ES 125
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 274
Free short title Professional Use of Hand Cleaners Professional Hand Cleaner /skin desinfectants (AISE-P1300)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 19
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 19 - Hand-mixing with intimate contact (only PPE available
9.125.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.125.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 19 (PC 39)
Name of contributing scenario 19 - Hand-mixing with intimate contact (only PPE available
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 15 mins to 1 hour
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,980 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 275
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.126 Scenario 126: Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) (AISE_CSP01a, AISE_CSP01b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.126 ff. Table 127. Description of ES 126
Free short title Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) (AISE_CSP01a, AISE_CSP01b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 8A
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities PROC 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
9.126.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 276
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.126.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.126.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 50 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 277
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.126.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8a - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at non dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 50 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.127 Scenario 127: Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP02) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 278
An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.127 ff. Table 128. Description of ES 127
Free short title Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP02)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 8B
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
9.127.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.127.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8B (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 279
Duration of activity 40 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.128 Scenario 128: Trigger spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product during short time. (AISE_CSP03) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Trigger spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product during short time.. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.128 ff. Table 129. Description of ES 128
Free short title Trigger spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product during short time. (AISE_CSP03)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying
9.128.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 280
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.128.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 40 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.129 Scenario 129: Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor) (AISE_CSP04)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 281
This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.129 ff. Table 130. Description of ES 129
Free short title Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor) (AISE_CSP04)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 11
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying PROC 11 - Non industrial spraying
9.129.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.129.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 282
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 50 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.129.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 11 - Non industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 50 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 283
Respiratory protection no
9.130 Scenario 130: Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP05) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a closed cleaning equipment. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.130 ff. Table 131. Description of ES 130
Free short title Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP05)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 1
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
9.130.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.130.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 (PC 35)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 284
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.131 Scenario 131: Using a diluted professional cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP06) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Using a diluted professional cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.131 ff. Table 132. Description of ES 131
Free short title Using a diluted professional cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP06)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.131.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 285
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.131.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 2 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 286
9.132 Scenario 132: Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a cleaning equipment; opportunity for exposure arises (AISE_CSP07) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a cleaning equipment; opportunity for exposure arises. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.132 ff. Table 133. Description of ES 132
Free short title Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a cleaning equipment; opportunity for exposure arises (AISE_CSP07)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.132.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.132.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 (PC 35)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 287
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.133 Scenario 133: Brushing a diluted professional cleaning solution, desinfectant or maintenance product (AISE_CSP08) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Brushing a diluted professional cleaning solution, desinfectant or maintenance product. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.133 ff. Table 134. Description of ES 133
Free short title Brushing a diluted professional cleaning solution, desinfectant or maintenance product (AISE_CSP08)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.133.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 288
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.133.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 50 %, concentration has been considered linearly (justification: The concentration is limited to 50%.)
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 289
Respiratory protection no
9.134 Scenario 134: Brushing a professional cleaning or maintenance product after trigger spraying (AISE_CSP09) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Brushing a professional cleaning or maintenance product after trigger spraying. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.134 ff. Table 135. Description of ES 134
Free short title Brushing a professional cleaning or maintenance product after trigger spraying (AISE_CSP09)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.134.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.134.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 290
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 220 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Ventilation good (30%)
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.135 Scenario 135: Brushing a concentrated professional cleaning or maintenance product. (AISE-CSP10) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Brushing a concentrated professional cleaning or maintenance product.. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.135 ff. Table 136. Description of ES 135
Free short title Brushing a concentrated professional cleaning or maintenance product. (AISE-CSP10)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.135.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 291
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.135.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 120 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 1 - 4 hours (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 292
Respiratory protection no
9.136 Scenario 136: Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with a professional cleaning or maintenance products (AISE_CSP11) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with a professional cleaning or maintenance products. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.136 ff. Table 137. Description of ES 136
Free short title Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with a professional cleaning or maintenance products (AISE_CSP11)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.136.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.136.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 (PC 35)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 293
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 60 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 1 - 4 hours (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.137 Scenario 137: Professional Use of Drain Unblockers (AISE_CSP12) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Professional Use of Drain Unblockers. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.137 ff. Table 138. Description of ES 137
Free short title Professional Use of Drain Unblockers (AISE_CSP12)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.137.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 294
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.137.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 (PC 35)
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 10 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: less than 15 mins (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 295
9.138 Scenario 138: Laboratory use of Cleaning and Maintenance products (AISE_CSP13) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Laboratory use of Cleaning and Maintenance products. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.138 ff. Table 139. Description of ES 138
Free short title Laboratory use of Cleaning and Maintenance products (AISE_CSP13)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PROC 15
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
9.138.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.138.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 15 (PC 21)
Name of contributing scenario 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
Product characteristics
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 296
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 40 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain professional
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Institutional use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.139 Scenario 139: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY REGULAR (powder, liquid) for consumer use (AISE C1) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY REGULAR (powder, liquid) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.139 ff. Table 140. Description of ES 139
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY REGULAR (powder, liquid) for consumer use (AISE C1)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.139.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 297
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.139.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
Frequency of use 260 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (5 times per week))
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 298
Duration of task shortened compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 80 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10 minutes/task). EcetocTRA uses 60 minutes (estimated for dish washing).)
9.140 Scenario 140: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY COMPACT (powder, liquid/gel, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C2) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY COMPACT (powder, liquid/gel, tablet) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.140 ff. Table 141. Description of ES 140
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY COMPACT (powder, liquid/gel, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C2)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.140.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 299
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.140.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
Frequency of use 260 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (5 times per week))
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Duration of task shortened compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 80 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10 minutes/task). EcetocTRA uses 60 minutes (estimated for dish washing).)
9.141 Scenario 141: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products FABRIC CONDITIONERS (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use (AISE C3) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products FABRIC CONDITIONERS (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 300
scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.141 ff. Table 142. Description of ES 141
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products FABRIC CONDITIONERS (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use (AISE C3)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.141.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.141.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
Frequency of use 208 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (4 times per week))
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 301
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Duration of task shortened compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 80 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10 minutes/task). EcetocTRA uses 60 minutes (estimated for dish washing).)
9.142 Scenario 142: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C4) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.142 ff. Table 143. Description of ES 142
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C4)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A, 8B; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8b Wide dispersive indoor use of reactive substances in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.142.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 302
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.142.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8B
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.142.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 303
Frequency of use 156 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (3 times per week))
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Duration of task shortened compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 80 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10 minutes/task). EcetocTRA uses 60 minutes (estimated for dish washing).)
9.143 Scenario 143: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products HAND DISHWASHING (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use (AISE C5) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products HAND DISHWASHING (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.143 ff. Table 144. Description of ES 143
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products HAND DISHWASHING (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use (AISE C5)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 304
9.143.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.143.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
Frequency of use 1 time(s)/day
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 305
Amount per task decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 80 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10 g/task). EcetocTRA uses 50g (estimated for laundry washing products).)
9.144 Scenario 144: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products MACHINE DISHWASHING (powder, liquid, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C6) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products MACHINE DISHWASHING (powder, liquid, tablet) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.144 ff. Table 145. Description of ES 144
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products MACHINE DISHWASHING (powder, liquid, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C6)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.144.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 306
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.144.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
Frequency of use 260 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (5 times per week))
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Duration of task shortened compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 98 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (<1 minute/task). EcetocTRA uses 60 minutes (estimated for hand dish washing).)
9.145 Scenario 145: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products SURFACE CLEANERS (liquid, powder, gel neat, spray neat) for consumer use (AISE C7) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products SURFACE CLEANERS (liquid, powder, gel neat, spray neat) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 307
scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.145 ff. Table 146. Description of ES 145
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products SURFACE CLEANERS (liquid, powder, gel neat, spray neat) for consumer use (AISE C7)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.145.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.145.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 104 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (2 times per week))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 308
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Amount per task decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 75 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (60 g/task). EcetocTRA uses 250 grams.)
9.146 Scenario 146: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C8) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.146 ff. Table 147. Description of ES 146
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C8)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A, 8B; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems ERC 8b Wide dispersive indoor use of reactive substances in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.146.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 309
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.146.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8B
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.146.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 310
Frequency of use 52 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (1 time per week))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Gram per task decreased compared to ecetocTRA inhalation: 85 % (justification: Maximum typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (35 g/task). EcetocTRA uses 250 grams.)
9.147 Scenario 147: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WATER SOFTENERS (powder, liquids, Tabs) for consumer use (AISE C9) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WATER SOFTENERS (powder, liquids, Tabs) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.147 ff. Table 148. Description of ES 147
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WATER SOFTENERS (powder, liquids, Tabs) for consumer use (AISE C9)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.147.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 311
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.147.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 104 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (2 times per week))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 312
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Duration of task decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 95 % (justification: Maximum typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (1 minute/task). EcetocTRA uses 20 mins(estimated for surface cleaners).)
9.148 Scenario 148: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products OVEN CLEANERS (spray, trigger) for consumer use (AISE C10) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products OVEN CLEANERS (spray, trigger) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.148 ff. Table 149. Description of ES 148
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products OVEN CLEANERS (spray, trigger) for consumer use (AISE C10)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.148.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 313
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.148.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 26 times/year (justification: ConsExpo assumption (26 times per year))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Grams per task decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 75 % (justification: Maximum typical value from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. for cleaners is 60g/event. This value is used to represent the oven cleaner. EcetocTRA uses 250 grams/event.)
9.149 Scenario 149: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products CARPET CLEANERS (spray, liquid) for consumer use (AISE C11) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products CARPET CLEANERS (spray, liquid) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.149 ff. Table 150. Description of ES 149
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 314
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products CARPET CLEANERS (spray, liquid) for consumer use (AISE C11)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.149.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.149.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 10 times/year (justification: ConsExpo Assumption (Carpet spray spot remover; foam) (10 times per year))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 315
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
9.150 Scenario 150: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY AIDS (ironing aids-starch spray, ironing aids-other) for consumer use (AISE C12) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY AIDS (ironing aids-starch spray, ironing aids-other) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.150 ff. Table 151. Description of ES 150
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY AIDS (ironing aids-starch spray, ironing aids-other) for consumer use (AISE C12)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.150.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 316
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.150.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Calculation model Ecetoc TRA
Product subcategory Laundry and dish washing products
Frequency and duration of use
Frequency of use 104 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (twice per week).)
Exposure time 1 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 60 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 60 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Amount per task decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 80 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10 g/task). EcetocTRA default: 50g)
9.151 Scenario 151: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DRAIN PRODUCTS (powder, gel) (AISE C13) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DRAIN PRODUCTS
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 317
(powder, gel). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.151 ff. Table 152. Description of ES 151
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DRAIN PRODUCTS (powder, gel) (AISE C13)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.151.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.151.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 52 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (1 time per week))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 318
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Amount per task and duration of task decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 95 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (70 g/event and duration of task: 10 mins). EcetocTRA default: 250g/event and 20 min))
9.152 Scenario 152: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DESCALERS (AISE C14) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DESCALERS. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.152 ff. Table 153. Description of ES 152
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DESCALERS (AISE C14)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.152.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 319
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.152.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 52 times/year (justification: No default values from AISE or RIVM (CONSEXPO) are available. However, it is expected that the frequency of use of descalers will be maximum once per week.)
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 320
Duration of exposure was decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 90 % (justification: No default values from AISE or RIVM (CONSEXPO) are available. However, it is expected that descalers will be applied to a household machine. After a given soaking time the descaler is removed. Thus, exposure duration will be limited to filling and de-filling operations. According to the “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” prepared by A.I.S.E. filling operations of machines take less than 1 minute. It is assumed that filling and de-filling operation will need equal times and thus a exposure time of 2 minutes was applied (EcetocTRA default: 20 min).)
9.153 Scenario 153: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WIPES (bathroom, kitchen, floor) for consumer use (AISE C15) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WIPES (bathroom, kitchen, floor) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.153 ff. Table 154. Description of ES 153
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WIPES (bathroom, kitchen, floor) for consumer use (AISE C15)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.153.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 321
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.153.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Amount per task and duration reduced compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 97.5 % (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (26 g/event and duration of task: 5 mins). EcetocTRA default: 250g/event and 20 min))
9.154 Scenario 154: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products High Pressure washers/cleaners (AISE C21) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 322
The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products High Pressure washers/cleaners. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.154 ff. Table 155. Description of ES 154
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products High Pressure washers/cleaners (AISE C21)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.154.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.154.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 12 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (0.23 time per week))
Exposure time 0.330 h
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 323
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
9.155 Scenario 155: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products Automotive Care (spray, liquid) (AISE C22) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of washing and cleaning products Automotive Care (spray, liquid). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.155 ff. Table 156. Description of ES 155
Free short title Consumer use of washing and cleaning products Automotive Care (spray, liquid) (AISE C22)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.155.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 324
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.a.v1 - AISE - Wide Dispersive Use in ‘Down the Drain’ cleaning and maintenance products (Consumers and Professionals) - Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.155.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Frequency of use 26 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (0.5 time per week))
Exposure time 0.330 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
9.156 Scenario 156: AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use (AISE C17) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 325
An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.156 ff. Table 157. Description of ES 156
Free short title AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use (AISE C17)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 3
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 3 Air care products
9.156.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 100 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.c.v1 - AISE- Wide Dispersive Use in Aerosol products for cleaning and maintenance products (Propellants) Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.156.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 3
Name of contributing scenario PC 3 Air care products
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 326
Frequency of use 416 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (8 events per week).)
Exposure time 0.250 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 7.5 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 10 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal -
Skin surface area oral -
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 100.0 %
9.157 Scenario 157: AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use (AISE C18) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.157 ff. Table 158. Description of ES 157
Free short title AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use (AISE C18)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 3
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 3 Air care products
9.157.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 327
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.b.v1 - AISE- Wide Dispersive Use in Aerosol products for cleaning and maintenance products (Non-Propellants) Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.157.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 3
Name of contributing scenario PC 3 Air care products
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 10 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 10 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 50 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal fingertips
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 328
Prodcut amount per event decreased compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 95 % (justification: Using the typical discharge rate (g/s) from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (0.000029 g/s), a maximum amount of 2.5 g will be released during a whole day. EcetocTRA uses 50 g/d as default.)
9.158 Scenario 158: Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, propellants (AISE C19a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, propellants. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.158 ff. Table 159. Description of ES 158
Free short title Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, propellants (AISE C19a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.158.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 100 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 329
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.c.v1 - AISE- Wide Dispersive Use in Aerosol products for cleaning and maintenance products (Propellants) Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.158.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Grams/task and duration of task reduced compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 98 % (justification: Maximum typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10.1 g/day and 8.1 min/task). EcetocTRA uses 250g/Task and 20 min/task.)
9.159 Scenario 159: Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, non-propellants (AISE C19b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, non-propellants. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.159 ff.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 330
Table 160. Description of ES 159
Free short title Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, non-propellants (AISE C19b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 35
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
9.159.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.b.v1 - AISE- Wide Dispersive Use in Aerosol products for cleaning and maintenance products (Non-Propellants) Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.159.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35
Name of contributing scenario PC 35 Washing and Cleaning Products (including solvent based products)
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 250 g
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 331
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
Grams per task and duration of task reduced compared to ecetocTRA
inhalation: 98 % (justification: Maximum typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (10.1 g/day and 8.1 min/task). EcetocTRA uses 250g/Task and 20 min/task.)
9.160 Scenario 160: Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, propellants (AISE C20a) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, propellants. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.160 ff. Table 161. Description of ES 160
Free short title Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, propellants (AISE C20a)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 31
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 31 Polishes and Wax Blends
9.160.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 100 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 0 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 332
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.c.v1 - AISE- Wide Dispersive Use in Aerosol products for cleaning and maintenance products (Propellants) Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.160.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 31
Name of contributing scenario PC 31 Polishes and Wax Blends
Frequency of use 52 times/year (justification: Typical value taken from “Table of habits and practices for consumer products in Western Europe” by A.I.S.E. (Once per week).)
Exposure time 4 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 10 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 10 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 135 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 100.0 %
9.161 Scenario 161: Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, non-propellants (AISE C20b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, non-propellants.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 333
The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.161 ff. Table 162. Description of ES 161
Free short title Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, non-propellants (AISE C20b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 8A; PC 31
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 8a Wide dispersive indoor use of processing aids in open systems
Name(s) of contributing consumer scenarios and corresponding PCs/ACs
PC 31 Polishes and Wax Blends
9.161.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 8A
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 2.055 kg/day
Release times per year 365 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 10 %
Fraction used at main source 0.075 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 8a.1.b.v1 - AISE- Wide Dispersive Use in Aerosol products for cleaning and maintenance products (Non-Propellants) Fraction of EU tonnage to region: 0.04 (default: 0.1)
9.161.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 31
Name of contributing scenario PC 31 Polishes and Wax Blends
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 334
Frequency of use 12 times/year (justification: Default values for this scenario in ecetocTRA are 550 g/event, 4h/event and a frequency of once per day. In case e.g. the amount of 550 g is used to wax the floor (during 4h) it is not very likely that the consumer will do this daily but rather once in a month. In case of polishing furnitures or shoes it can be expected that this will take less time and less amount of polish/wax is needed. Following assumptions were made: Waxing/polishing of furniture is done once per week with 100 g for 2 h. Waxing/polishing of shoes is done twice/week with 10 g for 0.5 h. Data of the worst case were calculated and presented.)
Exposure time 4 h
Product characteristics
Spray application no
Product ingredient fraction by weight (inhalation) 50 %
Product ingredient fraction by weight (dermal) 50 %
Amounts used
Amounts used 550 g
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Skin surface area dermal hands
Skin surface area oral -
Tranfer factor dermal 100 %
Other given operational conditions affecting consumers exposure
Room volume 20 m3
Release fraction to air 10.0 %
9.162 Scenario 162: Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) (AISE_CS_I01a, AISE_CS_I01b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.162 ff. Table 163. Description of ES 162
Free short title Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) (AISE_CS_I01a, AISE_CS_I01b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 8B
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 335
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities PROC 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
9.162.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.162.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 336
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 60 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 1 - 4 hours (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 8b - Transfer of chemicals from/to vessels/ large containers at dedicated facilities
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 60 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 337
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 1 - 4 hours (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.163 Scenario 163: Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CS_I02) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a closed cleaning equipment. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.163 ff. Table 164. Description of ES 163
Free short title Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CS_I02)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 1
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
9.163.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 338
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 1 - Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.164 Scenario 164: Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CS_I03) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.164 ff. Table 165. Description of ES 164
Free short title Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CS_I03)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 339
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 2
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
9.164.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 2 - Use in closed, continuous process with occasional controlled exposure
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 340
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.165 Scenario 165: Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises (AISE_CS_I04a, AISE_CS_I04b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.165 ff. Table 166. Description of ES 165
Free short title Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises (AISE_CS_I04a, AISE_CS_I04b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 4
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises PROC 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
9.165.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 341
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.165.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 342
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Name of contributing scenario 4 - Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves No
Respiratory protection no
9.166 Scenario 166: Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. (AISE_CS_I05a, AISE_CS_I05b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product.. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.166 ff. Table 167. Description of ES 166
Free short title Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. (AISE_CS_I05a, AISE_CS_I05b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 343
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 345
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection 90 %
9.167 Scenario 167: Spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning or maintenance product during short time. (AISE_CS_I06) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning or maintenance product during short time.. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.167 ff. Table 168. Description of ES 167
Free short title Spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning or maintenance product during short time. (AISE_CS_I06)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 7
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 7 - Industrial spraying
9.167.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 346
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 7 - Industrial spraying
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 5-25%
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 60 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 1,500 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 1 - 4 hours (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.168 Scenario 168: Brushing an industrial cleaning solution (AISE_CS_I07a, AISE_CS_I07b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Brushing an industrial cleaning solution. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.168 ff. Table 169. Description of ES 168
Free short title Brushing an industrial cleaning solution (AISE_CS_I07a, AISE_CS_I07b)
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 347
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.168.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.168.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 348
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 349
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.169 Scenario 169: Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) (AISE_CS_I08a, AISE_CS_I08b) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying). The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.169 ff. Table 170. Description of ES 169
Free short title Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) (AISE_CS_I08a, AISE_CS_I08b)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 10
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing PROC 10 - Roller application or brushing
9.169.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 350
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
9.169.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location outdoors (30%)
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 351
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Name of contributing scenario 10 - Roller application or brushing
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 480 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 960 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: >4 hours (default) (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.170 Scenario 170: Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with an industrial cleaning product (AISE_CS_I09) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with an industrial cleaning product. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.170 ff.
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 352
Table 171. Description of ES 170
Free short title Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with an industrial cleaning product (AISE_CS_I09)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 13
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
9.170.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 13 - Treatment of articles by dipping and pouring
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 220 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 480 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 353
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation yes (inhalation 90 %)
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 1 - 4 hours (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
9.171 Scenario 171: Quality control on industrial cleaning, desinfectants and maintenance Products (AISE_CS_I10) This scenario is described by the following combinations of use descriptors. The corresponding contributing scenarios are described in the respective subchapters. An overall exposure scenario may be described by a number of contributing scenarios which may be subdivided into environmental exposure, worker exposure and consumer exposure. The following scenarios contribute to the scenario Quality control on industrial cleaning, desinfectants and maintenance Products. The corresponding release to the environment, exposure of workers and consumers resulting from these contributing scenarios is summarized in chapter 10.171 ff. Table 172. Description of ES 171
Free short title Quality control on industrial cleaning, desinfectants and maintenance Products (AISE_CS_I10)
Systematic title based on use descriptor ERC 4; PROC 15
Name of contributing environmental scenario and corresponding ERC
ERC 4 Industrial use of processing aids
Name(s) of contributing worker scenarios and corresponding PROCs
PROC 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
9.171.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC 4
Operational conditions
Annual tonnage 1.00E4 to/year
Daily amount used at site 50 kg/day
Release times per year 220 days/year
Local freshwater dilution factor 10
Local marine water dilution factor 100
Release fraction to air from process 0 %
Release fraction to wastewater from process 100 %
Release fraction to soil from process 0 %
Fraction tonnage to region 100 %
Fraction used at main source 0.110 %
STP yes
River flow rate 18000 m3/day
CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT 354
Municipal sewage treatment plant discharge 2000000 L/day
Risk management measures
SpERC AISE SPERC 4.1.v1 - AISE - Industrial Use of Water Borne Processing Aids - no RMM
Name of contributing scenario 15 - Use of laboratory reagents in small scale laboratories
Product characteristics
Physical state liquid
Concentration in substance 100 %
Fugacity / Dustiness low
Frequency and duration of use
Duration of activity 40 min/day, duration of activity has been considered linearly (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Frequency of use 5 days / week
Human factors not influenced by risk management
Exposed skin surface 240 cm2
Other given operational conditions affecting workers exposure
Location indoors
Domain industrial
Technical conditions and measures to control dispersion and exposure
Local exhaust ventilation no
Conditions and measures related to personal protection, hygiene and health evaluation
Protective gloves 99 %, burst-time: 15 mins to 1 hour (justification: Imported Scenario settings from file: 120619_AISE Industrial use mapping_Publishedv2 Stand 19.6.2012 Angepasst an EasyTRA.xls)
Respiratory protection no
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.2 Scenario 2: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1003a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.2 10.2.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.2.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 299. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 2.1
10.2.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 301. Environmental risk STP of ES 2.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.2.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 302. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 2.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.2.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 24A Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 303. Worker risk of ES 2.2
10.3 Scenario 3: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1003b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.3 10.3.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.3.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.3.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 306. Environmental risk STP of ES 3.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.3.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 307. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 3.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.3.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 24A Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products: Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 308. Worker risk of ES 3.2
10.4 Scenario 4: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M1) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.4 10.4.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.4.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 309. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 4.1
10.4.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 311. Environmental risk STP of ES 4.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.4.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 312. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 4.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.4.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 1 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed process, no likelihood of exposure. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 313. Worker risk of ES 4.2
10.5 Scenario 5: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed, continous process with occasional controlled exposure (e.g. sampling). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M2) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.5 10.5.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed, continous process with occasional controlled exposure (e.g. sampling). Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.5.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 314. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 5.1
10.5.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 316. Environmental risk STP of ES 5.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.5.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 317. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 5.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.5.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed, continous process with occasional controlled exposure (e.g. sampling). Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 318. Worker risk of ES 5.2
10.6 Scenario 6: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M3) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.6 10.6.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.6.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 319. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 6.1
10.6.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 321. Environmental risk STP of ES 6.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.6.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 322. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 6.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
10.6.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 3 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in closed batch process (synthesis or formulation. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 323. Worker risk of ES 6.2
10.7 Scenario 7: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M4) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.7 10.7.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.7.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 324. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 7.1
10.7.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 326. Environmental risk STP of ES 7.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.7.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 327. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 7.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.7.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use in batch and other process (synthesis) where opportunity for exposure arises. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 328. Worker risk of ES 7.2
10.8 Scenario 8: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Mixing or blending in batch processes for formulation of preparations and articles (multistage and/or significant contact). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M5) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.8 10.8.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Mixing or blending in batch processes for formulation of preparations and articles (multistage and/or significant contact). Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.8.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 329. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 8.1
10.8.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 331. Environmental risk STP of ES 8.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.8.1.4 Man via environment
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 332. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 8.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.8.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 5 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Mixing or blending in batch processes for formulation of preparations and articles (multistage and/or significant contact). Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 333. Worker risk of ES 8.2
10.9 Scenario 9: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation (charging/discharging) from/to vessels/large containers at dedicated facilities. (A.I.S.E. M6) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.9
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.9.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation (charging/discharging) from/to vessels/large containers at dedicated facilities. The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.9.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 334. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 9.1
10.9.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 336. Environmental risk STP of ES 9.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.9.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 337. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 9.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.9.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 8B Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation (charging/discharging) from/to vessels/large containers at dedicated facilities. The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 338. Worker risk of ES 9.2
10.10 Scenario 10: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation into small containers (dedicated filling line, including weighing). Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M7) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.10 10.10.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation into small containers (dedicated filling line, including weighing). Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.10.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 339. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 10.1
10.10.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 341. Environmental risk STP of ES 10.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.10.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 342. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 10.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.10.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 9 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Transfer of substance or preparation into small containers (dedicated filling line, including weighing). Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 343. Worker risk of ES 10.2
10.11 Scenario 11: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelettisation. Industrial setting (A.I.S.E. M8) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.11 10.11.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelettisation. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.11.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 344. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 11.1
10.11.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 346. Environmental risk STP of ES 11.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.11.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 347. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 11.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.11.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 14 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Production of preparations or articles by tabletting, compression, extrusion, pelettisation. Industrial setting The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 348. Worker risk of ES 11.2
10.12 Scenario 12: Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use as a laboratory reagent (A.I.S.E. M9) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.12 10.12.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC2 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use as a laboratory reagent The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.12.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 349. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 12.1
10.12.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 351. Environmental risk STP of ES 12.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.014799 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.48E-6 1.13E10
10.12.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 352. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 12.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 8.07E7
10.12.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 15 Manufacturing of cleaning and Maintenance Products (main sector of use: SU3 - industrial uses) Use as a laboratory reagent The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 353. Worker risk of ES 12.2
10.13 Scenario 13: Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Automatic process (AISE-P101) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.13 10.13.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.13.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 354. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 13.1
10.13.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 356. Environmental risk STP of ES 13.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.13.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 357. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 13.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.13.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 358. Worker risk of ES 13.2
10.14 Scenario 14: Industrial use of Laundry products Conditioner (softner/starch); Automatic process (AISE-P104) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.14 10.14.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Laundry products Conditioner (softner/starch); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.14.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 359. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 14.1
10.14.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 361. Environmental risk STP of ES 14.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.14.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 362. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 14.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.14.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Laundry products Conditioner (softner/starch); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 363. Worker risk of ES 14.2
10.15 Scenario 15: Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Automatic process (AISE-P107)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.15 10.15.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.15.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 364. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 15.1
10.15.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 366. Environmental risk STP of ES 15.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.15.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 367. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 15.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.15.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 368. Worker risk of ES 15.2
10.16 Scenario 16: Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Automatic process (AISE-P110) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.16 10.16.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.16.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 369. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 16.1
10.16.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 371. Environmental risk STP of ES 16.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.16.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 372. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 16.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.16.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Automatic process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 373. Worker risk of ES 16.2
10.17 Scenario 17: Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P707a, AISE-P707b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.17 10.17.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.17.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 374. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 17.1
10.17.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 376. Environmental risk STP of ES 17.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.17.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 377. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 17.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.17.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.17.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 378. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 17.2
10.17.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 380. Environmental risk STP of ES 17.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.17.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 381. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 17.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.17.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 382. Worker risk of ES 17.3
10.17.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Train cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 383. Worker risk of ES 17.4
10.18 Scenario 18: Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P708a, AISE-P708b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.18 10.18.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.18.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 384. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 18.1
10.18.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 386. Environmental risk STP of ES 18.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.18.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 387. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 18.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.18.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.18.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 388. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 18.2
10.18.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 390. Environmental risk STP of ES 18.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.18.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 391. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 18.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.18.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 392. Worker risk of ES 18.3
10.18.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 393. Worker risk of ES 18.4
10.18.5 Contributing Scenario (5) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 394. Worker risk of ES 18.5
10.18.6 Contributing Scenario (6) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Vehicle cleaning Products Aeroplane cleaner; Semi-Automatic process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 395. Worker risk of ES 18.6
10.19 Scenario 19: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P709a, AISE-P709b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.19 10.19.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.19.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 396. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 19.1
10.19.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 398. Environmental risk STP of ES 19.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.19.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 399. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 19.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.19.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.19.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 400. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 19.2
10.19.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 402. Environmental risk STP of ES 19.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.19.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 403. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 19.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.19.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 404. Worker risk of ES 19.3
10.19.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 405. Worker risk of ES 19.4
10.19.5 Contributing Scenario (5) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 406. Worker risk of ES 19.5
10.19.6 Contributing Scenario (6) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 407. Worker risk of ES 19.6
10.20 Scenario 20: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process (AISE-P710a, AISE-P710b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.20 10.20.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.20.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 408. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 20.1
10.20.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 410. Environmental risk STP of ES 20.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.20.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 411. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 20.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.20.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.20.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 412. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 20.2
10.20.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 414. Environmental risk STP of ES 20.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.20.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 415. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 20.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.20.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 416. Worker risk of ES 20.3
10.20.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 417. Worker risk of ES 20.4
10.20.5 Contributing Scenario (5) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 418. Worker risk of ES 20.5
10.20.6 Contributing Scenario (6) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and rinse process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 419. Worker risk of ES 20.6
10.21 Scenario 21: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P711a, AISE-P711b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.21 10.21.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.21.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 420. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 21.1
10.21.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 422. Environmental risk STP of ES 21.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.21.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 423. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 21.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.21.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.21.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 424. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 21.2
10.21.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 426. Environmental risk STP of ES 21.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.21.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 427. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 21.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.21.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 428. Worker risk of ES 21.3
10.21.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 429. Worker risk of ES 21.4
10.22 Scenario 22: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P712a, AISE-P712b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.22 10.22.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.22.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 430. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 22.1
10.22.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 432. Environmental risk STP of ES 22.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.22.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 433. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 22.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.22.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.22.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 434. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 22.2
10.22.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 436. Environmental risk STP of ES 22.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.22.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 437. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 22.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.22.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 438. Worker risk of ES 22.3
10.22.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 439. Worker risk of ES 22.4
10.22.5 Contributing Scenario (5) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 440. Worker risk of ES 22.5
10.22.6 Contributing Scenario (6) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 441. Worker risk of ES 22.6
10.23 Scenario 23: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaning; semi automatic (AISE-P713) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.23 10.23.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaning; semi automatic The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.23.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 442. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 23.1
10.23.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 444. Environmental risk STP of ES 23.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.23.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 445. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 23.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.23.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaning; semi automatic The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 446. Worker risk of ES 23.2
10.24 Scenario 24: Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P714a, AISE-P714b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.24 10.24.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.24.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 447. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 24.1
10.24.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 449. Environmental risk STP of ES 24.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.24.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 450. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 24.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.24.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.24.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.24.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 453. Environmental risk STP of ES 24.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.24.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 454. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 24.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.24.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 455. Worker risk of ES 24.3
10.24.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 456. Worker risk of ES 24.4
10.25 Scenario 25: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Cleaning In place (CIP) process (AISE-P801) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.25 10.25.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Cleaning In place (CIP) process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.25.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 457. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 25.1
10.25.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 459. Environmental risk STP of ES 25.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.25.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 460. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 25.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.25.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 1 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Cleaning In place (CIP) process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 461. Worker risk of ES 25.2
10.26 Scenario 26: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Semi closed cleaning process (AISE-P802) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.26 10.26.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Semi closed cleaning process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.26.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 462. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 26.1
10.26.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 464. Environmental risk STP of ES 26.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.26.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 465. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 26.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.26.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Process cleaner; Semi closed cleaning process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 466. Worker risk of ES 26.2
10.27 Scenario 27: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic spray process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
(AISE-P803) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.27 10.27.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic spray process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.27.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 467. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 27.1
10.27.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 469. Environmental risk STP of ES 27.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.27.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 470. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 27.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.27.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic spray process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 471. Worker risk of ES 27.2
10.28 Scenario 28: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic drip and brush process (AISE-P804) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.28 10.28.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic drip and brush process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.28.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 472. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 28.1
10.28.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 474. Environmental risk STP of ES 28.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.28.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 475. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 28.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.28.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 13 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Chain maintenance product; Automatic drip and brush process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 476. Worker risk of ES 28.2
10.29 Scenario 29: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Defoaming product; Automatic process (AISE-P805) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.29 10.29.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Defoaming product; Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.29.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 477. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 29.1
10.29.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 479. Environmental risk STP of ES 29.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.29.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 480. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 29.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.29.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 1 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Defoaming product; Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 481. Worker risk of ES 29.2
10.30 Scenario 30: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic with venting process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
(AISE-P806) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.30 10.30.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic with venting process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.30.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 482. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 30.1
10.30.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 484. Environmental risk STP of ES 30.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.30.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 485. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 30.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.30.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic with venting process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 486. Worker risk of ES 30.2
10.31 Scenario 31: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic without venting process (AISE-P807) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.31 10.31.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic without venting process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.31.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 487. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 31.1
10.31.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 489. Environmental risk STP of ES 31.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.31.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 490. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 31.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.31.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Foam cleaner; Semi-Automatic without venting process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 491. Worker risk of ES 31.2
10.32 Scenario 32: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Animal housing care; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P809) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.32 10.32.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Animal housing care; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.32.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 492. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 32.1
10.32.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 494. Environmental risk STP of ES 32.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.32.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 495. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 32.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.32.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Animal housing care; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 496. Worker risk of ES 32.2
10.33 Scenario 33: Industrial use of pharmacos products Disinfection product; Semi-automatic process (AISE-P810)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.33 10.33.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of pharmacos products Disinfection product; Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.33.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 497. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 33.1
10.33.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 499. Environmental risk STP of ES 33.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.33.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 500. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 33.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.33.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of pharmacos products Disinfection product; Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 501. Worker risk of ES 33.2
10.34 Scenario 34: Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Disinfection product; Fogging and gassing Semi-automatic process (AISE-P811) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.34 10.34.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Disinfection product; Fogging and gassing Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.34.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 502. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 34.1
10.34.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 504. Environmental risk STP of ES 34.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.34.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 505. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 34.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.34.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial use of Food beverage and pharmacos products Disinfection product; Fogging and gassing Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 506. Worker risk of ES 34.2
10.35 Scenario 35: Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Process water (AISE-P903) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.35 10.35.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Process water The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.35.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 507. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 35.1
10.35.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 509. Environmental risk STP of ES 35.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.35.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 510. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 35.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.35.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Process water The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 511. Worker risk of ES 35.2
10.36 Scenario 36: Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Drink and pool water (AISE-P904)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.36 10.36.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Drink and pool water The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.36.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 512. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 36.1
10.36.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 514. Environmental risk STP of ES 36.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.36.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 515. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 36.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.36.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Water treatment Products Preservation and sanitation agent ; Drink and pool water The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 516. Worker risk of ES 36.2
10.37 Scenario 37: Industrial use of Water treatment Products Sanitation agent; Waste water (AISE-P905) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.37 10.37.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Water treatment Products Sanitation agent; Waste water The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.37.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 517. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 37.1
10.37.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 519. Environmental risk STP of ES 37.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.37.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 520. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 37.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.37.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Water treatment Products Sanitation agent; Waste water
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 521. Worker risk of ES 37.2
10.38 Scenario 38: Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process (AISE-P906) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.38 10.38.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.38.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 522. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 38.1
10.38.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 524. Environmental risk STP of ES 38.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.38.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 525. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 38.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.38.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 526. Worker risk of ES 38.2
10.39 Scenario 39: Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process (AISE-P907) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.39 10.39.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.39.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 527. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 39.1
10.39.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 529. Environmental risk STP of ES 39.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.39.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 530. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 39.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.39.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Industrial Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 531. Worker risk of ES 39.2
10.40 Scenario 40: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1001a, AISE-P1001b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.40 10.40.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.40.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 532. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 40.1
10.40.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 534. Environmental risk STP of ES 40.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.40.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 535. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 40.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.40.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.40.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 536. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 40.2
10.40.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 538. Environmental risk STP of ES 40.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.40.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 539. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 40.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
10.40.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 540. Worker risk of ES 40.3
10.40.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 541. Worker risk of ES 40.4
10.41 Scenario 41: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1001a, AISE-P1001b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.41 10.41.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.41.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 542. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 41.1
10.41.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 544. Environmental risk STP of ES 41.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.41.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 545. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 41.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.41.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.41.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 546. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 41.2
10.41.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 548. Environmental risk STP of ES 41.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.41.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 549. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 41.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.41.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 550. Worker risk of ES 41.3
10.41.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Conversion Layer agent; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 551. Worker risk of ES 41.4
10.42 Scenario 42: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1002a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.42 10.42.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.42.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 552. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 42.1
10.42.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 554. Environmental risk STP of ES 42.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.42.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 555. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 42.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.42.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 17 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 556. Worker risk of ES 42.2
10.43 Scenario 43: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1002b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.43 10.43.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.43.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 557. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 43.1
10.43.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 559. Environmental risk STP of ES 43.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.43.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 560. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 43.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.43.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 17 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal working fluid (rolling oils, lubricants); Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 561. Worker risk of ES 43.2
10.44 Scenario 44: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1003a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.44 10.44.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.44.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 562. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 44.1
10.44.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 564. Environmental risk STP of ES 44.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.44.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 565. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 44.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.44.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 24A Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 566. Worker risk of ES 44.2
10.45 Scenario 45: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1003b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.45 10.45.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.45.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 567. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 45.1
10.45.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 569. Environmental risk STP of ES 45.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.45.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 570. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 45.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.45.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 24A Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Hot metal working fluid; Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 571. Worker risk of ES 45.2
10.46 Scenario 46: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1004a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.46 10.46.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.46.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 572. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 46.1
10.46.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 574. Environmental risk STP of ES 46.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.46.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 575. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 46.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.46.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 576. Worker risk of ES 46.2
10.47 Scenario 47: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Nickel (AISE-P1004b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.47 10.47.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.47.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 577. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 47.1
10.47.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 579. Environmental risk STP of ES 47.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.47.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 580. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 47.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.47.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Manual process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 581. Worker risk of ES 47.2
10.48 Scenario 48: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1005a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.48 10.48.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.48.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 582. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 48.1
10.48.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 584. Environmental risk STP of ES 48.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.48.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 585. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 48.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.48.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 586. Worker risk of ES 48.2
10.49 Scenario 49: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1005b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.49 10.49.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.49.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 587. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 49.1
10.49.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 589. Environmental risk STP of ES 49.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.49.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 590. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 49.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.49.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Semi-automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 591. Worker risk of ES 49.2
10.50 Scenario 50: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1006a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.50 10.50.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.50.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 592. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 50.1
10.50.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 594. Environmental risk STP of ES 50.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.50.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 595. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 50.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.50.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.51 Scenario 51: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process (AISE-P1006b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.51 10.51.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.51.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 597. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 51.1
10.51.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 599. Environmental risk STP of ES 51.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.51.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 600. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 51.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.51.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Metal cleaner (degreaser, descaler, etch); Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 601. Worker risk of ES 51.2
10.52 Scenario 52: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1007a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.52 10.52.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.52.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 602. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 52.1
10.52.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 604. Environmental risk STP of ES 52.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.52.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 605. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 52.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.52.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 606. Worker risk of ES 52.2
10.53 Scenario 53: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Nickel (AISE-P1007b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.53 10.53.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.53.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 607. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 53.1
10.53.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 609. Environmental risk STP of ES 53.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.53.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 610. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 53.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.53.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Automatic process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 611. Worker risk of ES 53.2
10.54 Scenario 54: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1008a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.54 10.54.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.54.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 612. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 54.1
10.54.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 614. Environmental risk STP of ES 54.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.54.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 615. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 54.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.54.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 616. Worker risk of ES 54.2
10.55 Scenario 55: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P1008b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.55 10.55.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.55.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 617. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 55.1
10.55.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 619. Environmental risk STP of ES 55.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.55.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 620. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 55.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.55.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 621. Worker risk of ES 55.2
10.56 Scenario 56: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1009a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.56 10.56.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.56.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 622. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 56.1
10.56.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 624. Environmental risk STP of ES 56.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.56.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 625. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 56.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.56.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.57 Scenario 57: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Nickel (AISE-P1009b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.57 10.57.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.57.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 627. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 57.1
10.57.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 629. Environmental risk STP of ES 57.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.57.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 630. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 57.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.57.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Coating product (Paint, filler, Putty, Thinner); Manual process, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 631. Worker risk of ES 57.2
10.58 Scenario 58: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1010a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.58 10.58.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.58.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 632. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 58.1
10.58.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 634. Environmental risk STP of ES 58.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.58.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 635. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 58.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.58.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 636. Worker risk of ES 58.2
10.59 Scenario 59: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Nickel (AISE-P1010b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.59 10.59.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.59.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 637. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 59.1
10.59.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 639. Environmental risk STP of ES 59.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.59.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 640. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 59.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.59.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with no process water recycling, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.60 Scenario 60: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese (AISE-P1011a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.60 10.60.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.60.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 642. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 60.1
10.60.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 644. Environmental risk STP of ES 60.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.022154 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 2.22E-6 2.26E7
10.60.1.4 Man via environment
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 645. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 60.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.60.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Zinc, Chromium, Copper, Manganese The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 646. Worker risk of ES 60.2
10.61 Scenario 61: Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Nickel (AISE-P1011b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.61 10.61.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Nickel
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.61.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 647. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 61.1
10.61.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 649. Environmental risk STP of ES 61.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.004431 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 4.43E-7 1.13E8
10.61.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 650. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 61.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.61.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Industrial use of Metal Treatment Products* Surface finishing product; Manual with process water recycling, Nickel The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 651. Worker risk of ES 61.2
10.62 Scenario 62: Industrial use of Quality control Laboratory Reagents (AISE-P1250) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.62 10.62.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Industrial use of Quality control Laboratory Reagents The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.62.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 652. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 62.1
10.62.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 654. Environmental risk STP of ES 62.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.62.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 655. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 62.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.62.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 15 Industrial use of Quality control Laboratory Reagents The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 656. Worker risk of ES 62.2
10.63 Scenario 63: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Semi automatic process (AISE-P102) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.63 10.63.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.63.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 657. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 63.1
10.63.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 659. Environmental risk STP of ES 63.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.63.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 660. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 63.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.63.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 661. Worker risk of ES 63.2
10.64 Scenario 64: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Manual process (AISE-P103) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.64 10.64.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.64.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.64.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 664. Environmental risk STP of ES 64.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.64.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 665. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 64.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.64.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry detergent; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 666. Worker risk of ES 64.2
10.65 Scenario 65: Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process (AISE-P105) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.65 10.65.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.65.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 667. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 65.1
10.65.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 669. Environmental risk STP of ES 65.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.65.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 670. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 65.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.65.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 671. Worker risk of ES 65.2
10.65.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Professional Use of Laundry products Conditioner (softener/starch); Semi automatic process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 672. Worker risk of ES 65.3
10.66 Scenario 66: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process (AISE-P108) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.66 10.66.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8B Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.66.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 673. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 66.1
10.66.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 675. Environmental risk STP of ES 66.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.000971 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 9.71E-8 5.64E7
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.66.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 676. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 66.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.65E4
10.66.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 677. Worker risk of ES 66.2
10.66.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (gasing); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.67 Scenario 67: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process (AISE-P111) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.67 10.67.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8B Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.67.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 679. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 67.1
10.67.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 681. Environmental risk STP of ES 67.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.000971 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 9.71E-8 5.64E7
10.67.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 682. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 67.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.65E4
10.67.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 683. Worker risk of ES 67.2
10.67.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Semi automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 684. Worker risk of ES 67.3
10.68 Scenario 68: Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Manual process (AISE-P112) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.68 10.68.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.68.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 685. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 68.1
10.68.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 687. Environmental risk STP of ES 68.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.68.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 688. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 68.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.68.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 Professional Use of Laundry products Laundry aid (non-gasing); Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 689. Worker risk of ES 68.2
10.69 Scenario 69: Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process (AISE-P113a, AISE-P113b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.69 10.69.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.69.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.69.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 692. Environmental risk STP of ES 69.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.69.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 693. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 69.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.69.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.69.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 694. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 69.2
10.69.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 696. Environmental risk STP of ES 69.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.69.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 697. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 69.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.69.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 698. Worker risk of ES 69.3
10.69.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Laundry products Prespotter/Stain remover; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 699. Worker risk of ES 69.4
10.70 Scenario 70: Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Manual process (AISE-P201) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.70
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.70.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.70.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 700. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 70.1
10.70.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 702. Environmental risk STP of ES 70.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.70.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 703. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 70.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.70.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 704. Worker risk of ES 70.2
10.71 Scenario 71: Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash and rinse aid product; Automatic process (AISE-P202) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.71 10.71.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash and rinse aid product; Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.71.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 705. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 71.1
10.71.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 707. Environmental risk STP of ES 71.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.71.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 708. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 71.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.71.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 2 Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash and rinse aid product; Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.72 Scenario 72: Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P203) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.72 10.72.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.72.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 710. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 72.1
10.72.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 712. Environmental risk STP of ES 72.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.72.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 713. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 72.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.72.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 714. Worker risk of ES 72.2
10.72.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Professional Use of Dishwash products Dishwash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 715. Worker risk of ES 72.3
10.73 Scenario 73: Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P204) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.73 10.73.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.73.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 716. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 73.1
10.73.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 718. Environmental risk STP of ES 73.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.73.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 719. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 73.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.73.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 720. Worker risk of ES 73.2
10.73.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Professional Use of Dishwash products Rinse aid; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 721. Worker risk of ES 73.3
10.74 Scenario 74: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P301) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.74 10.74.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.74.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 722. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 74.1
10.74.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 724. Environmental risk STP of ES 74.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.74.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 725. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 74.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.74.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 726. Worker risk of ES 74.2
10.75 Scenario 75: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process (AISE-P302a, AISE-P302b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.75 10.75.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.75.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.75.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 729. Environmental risk STP of ES 75.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.75.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 730. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 75.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.75.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.75.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 731. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 75.2
10.75.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 733. Environmental risk STP of ES 75.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.75.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 734. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 75.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.75.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 735. Worker risk of ES 75.3
10.75.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products General purpose cleaner; Spray and wipe; manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 736. Worker risk of ES 75.4
10.76 Scenario 76: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P303) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.76
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.76.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.76.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 737. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 76.1
10.76.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 739. Environmental risk STP of ES 76.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.76.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 740. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 76.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.76.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 741. Worker risk of ES 76.2
10.77 Scenario 77: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P304a, AISE-P304b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.77 10.77.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.77.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 742. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 77.1
10.77.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 744. Environmental risk STP of ES 77.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.77.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 745. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 77.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.77.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.77.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 746. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 77.2
10.77.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 748. Environmental risk STP of ES 77.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.77.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 749. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 77.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.77.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 750. Worker risk of ES 77.3
10.77.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Kitchen cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 751. Worker risk of ES 77.4
10.78 Scenario 78: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P305) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.78 10.78.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.78.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 752. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 78.1
10.78.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 754. Environmental risk STP of ES 78.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.78.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 755. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 78.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.78.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 756. Worker risk of ES 78.2
10.79 Scenario 79: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P306a, AISE-P306b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.79 10.79.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.79.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 757. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 79.1
10.79.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 759. Environmental risk STP of ES 79.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.79.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 760. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 79.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.79.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.79.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 761. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 79.2
10.79.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 763. Environmental risk STP of ES 79.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.79.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 764. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 79.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.79.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 765. Worker risk of ES 79.3
10.79.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Sanitary cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 766. Worker risk of ES 79.4
10.80 Scenario 80: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Manual process (AISE-P307) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.80 10.80.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.80.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 767. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 80.1
10.80.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 769. Environmental risk STP of ES 80.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.80.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 770. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 80.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.80.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Manual process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 771. Worker risk of ES 80.2
10.81 Scenario 81: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process (AISE-P308a, AISE-P308b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.81 10.81.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.81.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 772. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 81.1
10.81.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 774. Environmental risk STP of ES 81.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.81.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 775. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 81.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.81.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.81.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 776. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 81.2
10.81.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 778. Environmental risk STP of ES 81.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.81.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 779. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 81.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.81.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 780. Worker risk of ES 81.3
10.81.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Descaling agent; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 781. Worker risk of ES 81.4
10.82 Scenario 82: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Periodic cleaning by dipping (AISE-P309) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.82 10.82.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Periodic cleaning by dipping The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.82.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 782. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 82.1
10.82.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 784. Environmental risk STP of ES 82.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.82.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 785. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 82.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.82.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Periodic cleaning by dipping The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 786. Worker risk of ES 82.2
10.83 Scenario 83: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P310) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.83 10.83.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.83.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 787. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 83.1
10.83.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 789. Environmental risk STP of ES 83.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.83.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 790. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 83.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.83.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 791. Worker risk of ES 83.2
10.84 Scenario 84: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P311a, AISE-P311b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.84 10.84.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.84.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 792. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 84.1
10.84.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 794. Environmental risk STP of ES 84.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.84.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 795. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 84.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
10.84.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.84.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 796. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 84.2
10.84.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 798. Environmental risk STP of ES 84.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.84.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 799. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 84.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.84.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 800. Worker risk of ES 84.3
10.84.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Oven/Grill Cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 801. Worker risk of ES 84.4
10.85 Scenario 85: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P312) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.85 10.85.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.85.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 802. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 85.1
10.85.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 804. Environmental risk STP of ES 85.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.85.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 805. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 85.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.85.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 806. Worker risk of ES 85.2
10.86 Scenario 86: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P313a, AISE-P313b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.86 10.86.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.86.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 807. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 86.1
10.86.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 809. Environmental risk STP of ES 86.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.86.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 810. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 86.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.86.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.86.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 811. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 86.2
10.86.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 813. Environmental risk STP of ES 86.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.86.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 814. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 86.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.86.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 815. Worker risk of ES 86.3
10.86.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Glass cleaner ; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 816. Worker risk of ES 86.4
10.87 Scenario 87: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Manual process (AISE-P314) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.87 10.87.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.87.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 817. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 87.1
10.87.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 819. Environmental risk STP of ES 87.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.87.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 820. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 87.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.87.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 821. Worker risk of ES 87.2
10.88 Scenario 88: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process (AISE-P315a, AISE-P315b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.88 10.88.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.88.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 822. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 88.1
10.88.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 824. Environmental risk STP of ES 88.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.88.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 825. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 88.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.88.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.88.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.88.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 828. Environmental risk STP of ES 88.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.88.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 829. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 88.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.88.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 830. Worker risk of ES 88.3
10.88.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Surface disinfectant; Spray and rinse manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 831. Worker risk of ES 88.4
10.89 Scenario 89: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Metal cleaning agent (including silver and copper polishes); Manual process (AISE-P316) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.89 10.89.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Metal cleaning agent (including silver and copper polishes); Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.89.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 832. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 89.1
10.89.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 834. Environmental risk STP of ES 89.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.89.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 835. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 89.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.89.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Metal cleaning agent (including silver and copper polishes); Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 836. Worker risk of ES 89.2
10.90 Scenario 90: Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Wet wipes; Manual process (AISE-P317) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.90 10.90.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Wet wipes; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.90.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 837. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 90.1
10.90.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 839. Environmental risk STP of ES 90.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.90.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 840. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 90.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.90.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of General surface cleaning products Wet wipes; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 841. Worker risk of ES 90.2
10.91 Scenario 91: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P401)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.91 10.91.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.91.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 842. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 91.1
10.91.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 844. Environmental risk STP of ES 91.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.91.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 845. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 91.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.91.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 846. Worker risk of ES 91.2
10.92 Scenario 92: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P402a, AISE-P402b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.92 10.92.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.92.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 847. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 92.1
10.92.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 849. Environmental risk STP of ES 92.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.92.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 850. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 92.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.92.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.92.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 851. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 92.2
10.92.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 853. Environmental risk STP of ES 92.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.92.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 854. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 92.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.92.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 855. Worker risk of ES 92.3
10.92.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 856. Worker risk of ES 92.4
10.93 Scenario 93: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P403a, AISE-P403b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.93 10.93.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.93.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 857. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 93.1
10.93.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 859. Environmental risk STP of ES 93.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.93.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 860. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 93.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.93.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.93.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 861. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 93.2
10.93.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 863. Environmental risk STP of ES 93.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.93.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 864. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 93.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.93.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 865. Worker risk of ES 93.3
10.93.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 866. Worker risk of ES 93.4
10.94 Scenario 94: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Manual process (AISE-P404) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.94 10.94.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.94.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 867. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 94.1
10.94.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 869. Environmental risk STP of ES 94.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.94.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 870. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 94.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.94.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 871. Worker risk of ES 94.2
10.95 Scenario 95: Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P405) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.95 10.95.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.95.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.95.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 874. Environmental risk STP of ES 95.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.95.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 875. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 95.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.95.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Floor stripper; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 876. Worker risk of ES 95.2
10.96 Scenario 96: Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Manual process (AISE-P406) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.96 10.96.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.96.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 877. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 96.1
10.96.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 879. Environmental risk STP of ES 96.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.96.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 880. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 96.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.96.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 881. Worker risk of ES 96.2
10.97 Scenario 97: Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P407)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.97 10.97.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.97.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 882. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 97.1
10.97.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 884. Environmental risk STP of ES 97.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.97.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 885. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 97.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.97.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 886. Worker risk of ES 97.2
10.98 Scenario 98: Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P408a, AISE-P408b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.98 10.98.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.98.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 887. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 98.1
10.98.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 889. Environmental risk STP of ES 98.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.98.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 890. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 98.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.98.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.98.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 891. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 98.2
10.98.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 893. Environmental risk STP of ES 98.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.98.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 894. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 98.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.98.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 895. Worker risk of ES 98.3
10.98.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Polish / impregnating agent; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 896. Worker risk of ES 98.4
10.99 Scenario 99: Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P409) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.99 10.99.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.99.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 897. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 99.1
10.99.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 899. Environmental risk STP of ES 99.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.99.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 900. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 99.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.99.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 901. Worker risk of ES 99.2
10.100 Scenario 100: Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P410) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.100 10.100.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.100.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 902. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 100.1
10.100.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 904. Environmental risk STP of ES 100.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.100.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 905. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 100.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.100.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet cleaner; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 906. Worker risk of ES 100.2
10.101 Scenario 101: Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process (AISE-P411a, AISE-P411b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.101 10.101.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.101.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 907. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 101.1
10.101.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 909. Environmental risk STP of ES 101.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.101.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 910. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 101.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.101.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.101.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 911. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 101.2
10.101.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 913. Environmental risk STP of ES 101.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.101.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 914. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 101.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.101.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 915. Worker risk of ES 101.3
10.101.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Floor care products Carpet pre-spotters; Spray and brush manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 916. Worker risk of ES 101.4
10.102 Scenario 102: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Manual process (AISE-P601) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.102 10.102.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.102.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 917. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 102.1
10.102.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 919. Environmental risk STP of ES 102.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.102.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 920. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 102.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.102.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 921. Worker risk of ES 102.2
10.103 Scenario 103: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P602a, AISE-P602b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.103 10.103.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.103.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 922. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 103.1
10.103.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 924. Environmental risk STP of ES 103.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.103.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 925. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 103.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.103.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.103.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 926. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 103.2
10.103.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 928. Environmental risk STP of ES 103.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.103.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 929. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 103.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.103.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 930. Worker risk of ES 103.3
10.103.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Wooden Furniture care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 931. Worker risk of ES 103.4
10.104 Scenario 104: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Manual process (AISE-P603) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.104 10.104.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.104.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 932. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 104.1
10.104.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 934. Environmental risk STP of ES 104.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.104.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 935. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 104.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.104.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 936. Worker risk of ES 104.2
10.105 Scenario 105: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P604a, AISE-P604b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.105 10.105.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.105.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 937. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 105.1
10.105.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 939. Environmental risk STP of ES 105.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.105.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 940. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 105.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.105.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.105.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 941. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 105.2
10.105.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 943. Environmental risk STP of ES 105.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.105.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 944. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 105.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.105.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 945. Worker risk of ES 105.3
10.105.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 946. Worker risk of ES 105.4
10.106 Scenario 106: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P605) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.106 10.106.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.106.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 947. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 106.1
10.106.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 949. Environmental risk STP of ES 106.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.106.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 950. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 106.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.106.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 2 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Leather care product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 951. Worker risk of ES 106.2
10.107 Scenario 107: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain unblocker; Manual process (AISE-P606) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.107 10.107.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain unblocker; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.107.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment)
10.107.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 954. Environmental risk STP of ES 107.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.107.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 955. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 107.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.107.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain unblocker; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 956. Worker risk of ES 107.2
10.108 Scenario 108: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P607) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.108 10.108.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.108.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 957. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 108.1
10.108.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 959. Environmental risk STP of ES 108.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.108.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 960. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 108.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.108.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Drain cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 961. Worker risk of ES 108.2
10.109 Scenario 109: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
steel care ; Manual process (AISE-P608) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.109 10.109.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care ; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.109.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 962. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 109.1
10.109.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 964. Environmental risk STP of ES 109.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.109.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 965. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 109.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.109.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care ; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 966. Worker risk of ES 109.2
10.110 Scenario 110: Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P609a, AISE-P609b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.110 10.110.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.110.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 967. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 110.1
10.110.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 969. Environmental risk STP of ES 110.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.110.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 970. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 110.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.110.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.110.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 971. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 110.2
10.110.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 973. Environmental risk STP of ES 110.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.110.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 974. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 110.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.110.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 975. Worker risk of ES 110.3
10.110.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Maintenance Products Stainless steel care; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 976. Worker risk of ES 110.4
10.111 Scenario 111: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P701a, AISE-P701b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.111
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.111.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.111.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 977. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 111.1
10.111.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 979. Environmental risk STP of ES 111.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.111.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 980. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 111.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.111.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.111.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 981. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 111.2
10.111.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 983. Environmental risk STP of ES 111.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.111.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 984. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 111.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.111.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 985. Worker risk of ES 111.3
10.111.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 986. Worker risk of ES 111.4
10.112 Scenario 112: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process (AISE-P702a, AISE-P702b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.112 10.112.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.112.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 987. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 112.1
10.112.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 989. Environmental risk STP of ES 112.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.112.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 990. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 112.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.112.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.112.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 991. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 112.2
10.112.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 993. Environmental risk STP of ES 112.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.112.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 994. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 112.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.112.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 995. Worker risk of ES 112.3
10.112.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
11 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray - Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 996. Worker risk of ES 112.4
10.113 Scenario 113: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process (AISE-P703a, AISE-P703b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.113 10.113.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.113.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 997. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 113.1
10.113.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 999. Environmental risk STP of ES 113.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.113.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1000. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 113.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.113.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.113.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1001. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 113.2
10.113.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1003. Environmental risk STP of ES 113.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.113.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1004. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 113.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.113.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.113.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Car wash product; Spray and Wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1006. Worker risk of ES 113.4
10.114 Scenario 114: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process (AISE-P704a, AISE-P704b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.114 10.114.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.114.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1007. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 114.1
10.114.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1009. Environmental risk STP of ES 114.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.114.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1010. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 114.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.114.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.114.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1011. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 114.2
10.114.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1013. Environmental risk STP of ES 114.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.114.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1014. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 114.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.114.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1015. Worker risk of ES 114.3
10.114.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Dewaxing product; Semi-Automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1016. Worker risk of ES 114.4
10.115 Scenario 115: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Manual process (AISE-P705) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.115 10.115.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.115.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1017. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 115.1
10.115.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1019. Environmental risk STP of ES 115.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.115.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1020. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 115.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.115.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1021. Worker risk of ES 115.2
10.116 Scenario 116: Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process (AISE-P706a, AISE-P706b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.116 10.116.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.116.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1022. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 116.1
10.116.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1024. Environmental risk STP of ES 116.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.116.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1025. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 116.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.116.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.116.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1026. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 116.2
10.116.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1028. Environmental risk STP of ES 116.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.116.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1029. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 116.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.116.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1030. Worker risk of ES 116.3
10.116.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Vehicle cleaning Products Boat cleaner; Spray and wipe manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1031. Worker risk of ES 116.4
10.117 Scenario 117: Professional Use of pharmacos products Animal care; Manual process (AISE-P808) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.117 10.117.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of pharmacos products Animal care; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.117.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1032. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 117.1
10.117.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1034. Environmental risk STP of ES 117.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.117.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1035. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 117.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.117.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of pharmacos products Animal care; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1036. Worker risk of ES 117.2
10.118 Scenario 118: Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process (AISE-P901a, AISE-P901b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.118 10.118.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8D Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.118.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1037. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 118.1
10.118.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1039. Environmental risk STP of ES 118.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.118.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1040. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 118.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.118.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8D Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.118.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1041. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 118.2
10.118.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1043. Environmental risk STP of ES 118.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.118.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1044. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 118.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.118.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1045. Worker risk of ES 118.3
10.118.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; High pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1046. Worker risk of ES 118.4
10.119 Scenario 119: Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process (AISE-P902a, AISE-P902b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.119 10.119.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8D Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.119.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1047. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 119.1
10.119.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1049. Environmental risk STP of ES 119.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.119.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1050. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 119.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.119.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8D Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.119.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1051. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 119.2
10.119.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1053. Environmental risk STP of ES 119.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.119.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1054. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 119.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.119.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.119.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1056. Worker risk of ES 119.4
10.119.5 Contributing Scenario (5) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1057. Worker risk of ES 119.5
10.119.6 Contributing Scenario (6) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Façade/surface Cleaning Products Façade/surface cleaner; Medium pressure process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable.
10.120 Scenario 120: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process (AISE-P1101) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.120 10.120.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.120.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1059. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 120.1
10.120.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1061. Environmental risk STP of ES 120.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.120.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1062. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 120.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.120.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1063. Worker risk of ES 120.2
10.120.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Semi-automatic process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1064. Worker risk of ES 120.3
10.121 Scenario 121: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Dipping process (AISE-P1102) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.121 10.121.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Dipping process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.121.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1065. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 121.1
10.121.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1067. Environmental risk STP of ES 121.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.121.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1068. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 121.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.121.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Dipping process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1069. Worker risk of ES 121.2
10.122 Scenario 122: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Manual process (AISE-P1103) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.122 10.122.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.122.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1070. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 122.1
10.122.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1072. Environmental risk STP of ES 122.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.122.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1073. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 122.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
10.122.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Manual process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1074. Worker risk of ES 122.2
10.123 Scenario 123: Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process (AISE-P1104a, AISE-P1104b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.123 10.123.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.123.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1075. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 123.1
10.123.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1077. Environmental risk STP of ES 123.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.123.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1078. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 123.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.123.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.123.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1079. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 123.2
10.123.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1081. Environmental risk STP of ES 123.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.123.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1082. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 123.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.123.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1083. Worker risk of ES 123.3
10.123.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Professional Use of Medical Devices Medical devices ; Spray and wipe process The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1084. Worker risk of ES 123.4
10.124 Scenario 124: Laboratory Use Laboratory Reagents (sampling cleaning product for dosage, pH measurement, titration of chlorine, water hardness, etc…) (AISE-P1200) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.124 10.124.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Laboratory Use Laboratory Reagents (sampling cleaning product for dosage, pH measurement, titration of chlorine, water hardness, etc…) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.124.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1085. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 124.1
10.124.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1087. Environmental risk STP of ES 124.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.124.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1088. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 124.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.124.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 15 Laboratory Use Laboratory Reagents (sampling cleaning product for dosage, pH measurement, titration of chlorine, water hardness, etc…) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1089. Worker risk of ES 124.2
10.125 Scenario 125: Professional Use of Hand Cleaners Professional Hand Cleaner /skin desinfectants (AISE-P1300) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.125 10.125.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Hand Cleaners Professional Hand Cleaner /skin desinfectants The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.125.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1090. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 125.1
10.125.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1092. Environmental risk STP of ES 125.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.125.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1093. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 125.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.125.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 19 Professional Use of Hand Cleaners Professional Hand Cleaner /skin desinfectants The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1094. Worker risk of ES 125.2
10.126 Scenario 126: Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) (AISE_CSP01a, AISE_CSP01b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.126 10.126.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.126.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1095. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 126.1
10.126.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1097. Environmental risk STP of ES 126.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.126.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1098. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 126.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.126.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.126.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1099. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 126.2
10.126.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1101. Environmental risk STP of ES 126.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.126.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1102. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 126.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.126.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1103. Worker risk of ES 126.3
10.126.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8A Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a cleaning equipment (machine/vessel/bucket) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1104. Worker risk of ES 126.4
10.127 Scenario 127: Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP02) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.127 10.127.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.127.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1105. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 127.1
10.127.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1107. Environmental risk STP of ES 127.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.127.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1108. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 127.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.127.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 8B Transfer of professional cleaning or maintenance product (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1109. Worker risk of ES 127.2
10.128 Scenario 128: Trigger spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product during short time. (AISE_CSP03) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.128 10.128.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Trigger spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product during short time. The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.128.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1110. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 128.1
10.128.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1112. Environmental risk STP of ES 128.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.128.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1113. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 128.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.128.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Trigger spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product during short time. The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1114. Worker risk of ES 128.2
10.129 Scenario 129: Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor) (AISE_CSP04) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.129 10.129.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.129.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1115. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 129.1
10.129.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1117. Environmental risk STP of ES 129.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.129.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1118. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 129.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.129.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1119. Worker risk of ES 129.2
10.129.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 11 Spraying of a professional cleaning or maintenance product (indoor and outdoor) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1120. Worker risk of ES 129.3
10.130 Scenario 130: Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP05) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.130 10.130.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.130.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1121. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 130.1
10.130.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1123. Environmental risk STP of ES 130.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.130.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1124. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 130.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.130.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 1 Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1125. Worker risk of ES 130.2
10.131 Scenario 131: Using a diluted professional cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CSP06) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.131 10.131.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Using a diluted professional cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.131.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1126. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 131.1
10.131.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1128. Environmental risk STP of ES 131.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.131.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1129. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 131.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.131.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 2 Using a diluted professional cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1130. Worker risk of ES 131.2
10.132 Scenario 132: Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a cleaning equipment; opportunity for exposure
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
arises (AISE_CSP07) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.132 10.132.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a cleaning equipment; opportunity for exposure arises The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.132.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1131. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 132.1
10.132.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1133. Environmental risk STP of ES 132.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.132.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1134. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 132.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.132.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 4 Using a diluted professional cleaning solution or maintenance product in a cleaning equipment; opportunity for exposure arises The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1135. Worker risk of ES 132.2
10.133 Scenario 133: Brushing a diluted professional cleaning solution, desinfectant or maintenance product (AISE_CSP08) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.133 10.133.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Brushing a diluted professional cleaning solution, desinfectant or maintenance product The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.133.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1136. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 133.1
10.133.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1138. Environmental risk STP of ES 133.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.133.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1139. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 133.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.133.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing a diluted professional cleaning solution, desinfectant or maintenance product The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1140. Worker risk of ES 133.2
10.134 Scenario 134: Brushing a professional cleaning or maintenance product after trigger spraying (AISE_CSP09) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.134 10.134.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Brushing a professional cleaning or maintenance product after trigger spraying The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.134.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1141. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 134.1
10.134.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1143. Environmental risk STP of ES 134.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.134.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1144. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 134.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.134.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing a professional cleaning or maintenance product after trigger spraying The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1145. Worker risk of ES 134.2
10.135 Scenario 135: Brushing a concentrated professional cleaning or
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
maintenance product. (AISE-CSP10) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.135 10.135.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Brushing a concentrated professional cleaning or maintenance product. The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.135.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1146. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 135.1
10.135.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1148. Environmental risk STP of ES 135.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.135.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1149. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 135.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.135.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing a concentrated professional cleaning or maintenance product. The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1150. Worker risk of ES 135.2
10.136 Scenario 136: Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with a professional cleaning or maintenance products (AISE_CSP11) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.136 10.136.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with a professional cleaning or maintenance products The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.136.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1151. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 136.1
10.136.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1153. Environmental risk STP of ES 136.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.136.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1154. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 136.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.136.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with a professional cleaning or maintenance products The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1155. Worker risk of ES 136.2
10.137 Scenario 137: Professional Use of Drain Unblockers (AISE_CSP12) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.137 10.137.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Professional Use of Drain Unblockers The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.137.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1156. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 137.1
10.137.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1158. Environmental risk STP of ES 137.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.137.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1159. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 137.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.137.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 13 Professional Use of Drain Unblockers The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1160. Worker risk of ES 137.2
10.138 Scenario 138: Laboratory use of Cleaning and Maintenance
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
products (AISE_CSP13) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.138 10.138.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Laboratory use of Cleaning and Maintenance products The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.138.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1161. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 138.1
10.138.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1163. Environmental risk STP of ES 138.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.138.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1164. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 138.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.138.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling professional worker exposure for PROC 15 Laboratory use of Cleaning and Maintenance products The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1165. Worker risk of ES 138.2
10.139 Scenario 139: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY REGULAR (powder, liquid) for consumer use (AISE C1) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.139 10.139.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY REGULAR (powder, liquid) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.139.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1166. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 139.1
10.139.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1168. Environmental risk STP of ES 139.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.139.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1169. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 139.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.139.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY REGULAR (powder, liquid) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1170. Consumer risk of ES 139.2
10.140 Scenario 140: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY COMPACT (powder, liquid/gel, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C2) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.140 10.140.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY COMPACT (powder, liquid/gel, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.140.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1171. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 140.1
10.140.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1173. Environmental risk STP of ES 140.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.140.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1174. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 140.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.140.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY COMPACT (powder, liquid/gel, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1175. Consumer risk of ES 140.2
10.141 Scenario 141: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products FABRIC CONDITIONERS (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use (AISE C3) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.141 10.141.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products FABRIC CONDITIONERS (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.141.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1176. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 141.1
10.141.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1178. Environmental risk STP of ES 141.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.141.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1179. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 141.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.141.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products FABRIC CONDITIONERS (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1180. Consumer risk of ES 141.2
10.142 Scenario 142: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C4) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.142 10.142.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.142.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1181. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 142.1
10.142.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1183. Environmental risk STP of ES 142.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.142.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1184. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 142.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.142.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8B Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.142.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1185. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 142.2
10.142.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1187. Environmental risk STP of ES 142.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.142.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1188. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 142.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.142.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY ADDITIVES (powder bleach, liquid bleach, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1189. Consumer risk of ES 142.3
10.143 Scenario 143: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products HAND DISHWASHING (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use (AISE C5) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.143 10.143.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products HAND DISHWASHING (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.143.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1190. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 143.1
10.143.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1192. Environmental risk STP of ES 143.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.143.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1193. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 143.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.143.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products HAND DISHWASHING (liquid regular, liquid concentrate) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1194. Consumer risk of ES 143.2
10.144 Scenario 144: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products MACHINE DISHWASHING (powder, liquid, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C6) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.144 10.144.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products MACHINE DISHWASHING (powder, liquid, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.144.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1195. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 144.1
10.144.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1197. Environmental risk STP of ES 144.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.144.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1198. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 144.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.144.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products MACHINE DISHWASHING (powder, liquid, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1199. Consumer risk of ES 144.2
10.145 Scenario 145: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products SURFACE CLEANERS (liquid, powder, gel neat, spray neat) for consumer use (AISE C7) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.145 10.145.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products SURFACE CLEANERS (liquid, powder, gel neat, spray neat) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.145.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1200. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 145.1
10.145.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1202. Environmental risk STP of ES 145.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.145.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1203. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 145.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.145.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products SURFACE CLEANERS (liquid, powder, gel neat, spray neat) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1204. Consumer risk of ES 145.2
10.146 Scenario 146: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use (AISE C8)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.146 10.146.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.146.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1205. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 146.1
10.146.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1207. Environmental risk STP of ES 146.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.146.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1208. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 146.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.146.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8B Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.146.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1209. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 146.2
10.146.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1211. Environmental risk STP of ES 146.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.146.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1212. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 146.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.146.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products TOILET CLEANERS (powder, liquid, gel, tablet) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1213. Consumer risk of ES 146.3
10.147 Scenario 147: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WATER SOFTENERS (powder, liquids, Tabs) for consumer use (AISE C9) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.147
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.147.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WATER SOFTENERS (powder, liquids, Tabs) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.147.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1214. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 147.1
10.147.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1216. Environmental risk STP of ES 147.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.147.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1217. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 147.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.147.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WATER SOFTENERS (powder, liquids, Tabs) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1218. Consumer risk of ES 147.2
10.148 Scenario 148: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products OVEN CLEANERS (spray, trigger) for consumer use (AISE C10) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.148 10.148.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products OVEN CLEANERS (spray, trigger) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.148.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1219. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 148.1
10.148.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1221. Environmental risk STP of ES 148.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.148.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1222. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 148.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.148.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products OVEN CLEANERS (spray, trigger) for consumer use
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1223. Consumer risk of ES 148.2
10.149 Scenario 149: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products CARPET CLEANERS (spray, liquid) for consumer use (AISE C11) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.149 10.149.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products CARPET CLEANERS (spray, liquid) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.149.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1224. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 149.1
10.149.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1226. Environmental risk STP of ES 149.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.149.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1227. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 149.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.149.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products CARPET CLEANERS (spray, liquid) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1228. Consumer risk of ES 149.2
10.150 Scenario 150: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY AIDS (ironing aids-starch spray, ironing aids-other) for consumer use (AISE C12)
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.150 10.150.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY AIDS (ironing aids-starch spray, ironing aids-other) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.150.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1229. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 150.1
10.150.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1231. Environmental risk STP of ES 150.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.150.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1232. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 150.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.150.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products LAUNDRY AIDS (ironing aids-starch spray, ironing aids-other) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1233. Consumer risk of ES 150.2
10.151 Scenario 151: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DRAIN PRODUCTS (powder, gel) (AISE C13) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.151 10.151.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DRAIN PRODUCTS (powder, gel) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.151.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1234. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 151.1
10.151.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1236. Environmental risk STP of ES 151.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.151.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1237. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 151.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.151.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DRAIN PRODUCTS (powder, gel) The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1238. Consumer risk of ES 151.2
10.152 Scenario 152: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DESCALERS (AISE C14) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.152 10.152.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DESCALERS The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.152.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1239. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 152.1
10.152.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1241. Environmental risk STP of ES 152.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.152.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1242. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 152.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.152.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products DESCALERS The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1243. Consumer risk of ES 152.2
10.153 Scenario 153: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WIPES (bathroom, kitchen, floor) for consumer use (AISE C15) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.153 10.153.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WIPES (bathroom, kitchen, floor) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.153.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1244. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 153.1
10.153.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1246. Environmental risk STP of ES 153.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.153.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1247. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 153.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.153.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products WIPES (bathroom, kitchen, floor) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1248. Consumer risk of ES 153.2
10.154 Scenario 154: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products High Pressure washers/cleaners (AISE C21) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.154 10.154.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products High Pressure washers/cleaners The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.154.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1249. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 154.1
10.154.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1251. Environmental risk STP of ES 154.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.154.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1252. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 154.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.154.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products High Pressure washers/cleaners The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1253. Consumer risk of ES 154.2
10.155 Scenario 155: Consumer use of washing and cleaning products Automotive Care (spray, liquid) (AISE C22) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.155 10.155.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of washing and cleaning products Automotive Care (spray, liquid) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.155.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1254. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 155.1
10.155.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1256. Environmental risk STP of ES 155.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.155.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1257. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 155.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.155.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of washing and cleaning products Automotive Care (spray, liquid) The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1258. Consumer risk of ES 155.2
10.156 Scenario 156: AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use (AISE C17) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.156 10.156.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.156.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1259. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 156.1
10.156.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1261. Environmental risk STP of ES 156.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0 ∞
10.156.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1262. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 156.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.156.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 3 AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS AEROSOL (aqueous, non aqueous, concentrated (mini-aerosol)Timed-release aerosols) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1263. Consumer risk of ES 156.2
10.157 Scenario 157: AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use (AISE C18) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.157 10.157.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.157.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1264. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 157.1
10.157.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1266. Environmental risk STP of ES 157.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.157.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1267. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 157.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.157.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 3 AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use AIR FRESHENERS NON AEROSOL (Perfume in/on solid substarte (gel), candles, diffusers (heated) for consumer use The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1268. Consumer risk of ES 157.2
10.158 Scenario 158: Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, propellants (AISE C19a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.158 10.158.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.158.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1269. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 158.1
10.158.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1271. Environmental risk STP of ES 158.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0 ∞
10.158.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1272. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 158.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.158.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1273. Consumer risk of ES 158.2
10.159 Scenario 159: Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, non-propellants (AISE C19b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.159 10.159.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, non-propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.159.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1274. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 159.1
10.159.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1276. Environmental risk STP of ES 159.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.159.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1277. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 159.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.159.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 35 Consumer use of pest control products INSECTICIDES (liquid electric, spray neat) and REPELLENTS for consumer use, non-propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1278. Consumer risk of ES 159.2
10.160 Scenario 160: Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, propellants (AISE C20a) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.160 10.160.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.160.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1279. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 160.1
10.160.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1281. Environmental risk STP of ES 160.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0 ∞
10.160.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1282. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 160.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.160.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 31 Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1283. Consumer risk of ES 160.2
10.161 Scenario 161: Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, non-propellants (AISE C20b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.161 10.161.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC8A Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, non-propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.161.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1284. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 161.1
10.161.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1286. Environmental risk STP of ES 161.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.018209 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 1.82E-6 1.13E6
10.161.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1287. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 161.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 9,931.113
10.161.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling consumer exposure for PC 31 Consumer use of polishes FURNITURE FLOOR & LEATHER CARE (spray, liquid) for consumer use, non-propellants The quantitative risk characterisation for this consumer exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA using the Ecetoc TRA calculation model. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the oral, dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of consumers over all routes if applicable. Table 1288. Consumer risk of ES 161.2
10.162 Scenario 162: Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) (AISE_CS_I01a, AISE_CS_I01b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.162 10.162.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.162.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1289. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 162.1
10.162.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1291. Environmental risk STP of ES 162.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.162.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1292. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 162.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.162.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.162.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1293. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 162.2
10.162.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1295. Environmental risk STP of ES 162.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.162.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1296. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 162.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
mg/kgbw/day
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.162.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 8B Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1297. Worker risk of ES 162.3
10.162.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 8B Transfer of industrial detergent, maintenance or desinfectant (charging/discharging) to a dedicated cleaning equipment (machine/vessel) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1298. Worker risk of ES 162.4
10.163 Scenario 163: Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CS_I02) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.163 10.163.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.163.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1299. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 163.1
10.163.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1301. Environmental risk STP of ES 163.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.163.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1302. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 163.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.163.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 1 Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1303. Worker risk of ES 163.2
10.164 Scenario 164: Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment (AISE_CS_I03) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.164 10.164.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.164.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1304. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 164.1
10.164.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1306. Environmental risk STP of ES 164.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.164.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1307. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 164.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.164.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 2 Using a diluted industrial cleaning solution in a semi closed cleaning equipment The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1308. Worker risk of ES 164.2
10.165 Scenario 165: Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises (AISE_CS_I04a, AISE_CS_I04b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.165 10.165.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.165.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1309. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 165.1
10.165.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1311. Environmental risk STP of ES 165.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.165.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1312. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 165.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.165.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.165.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1313. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 165.2
10.165.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1315. Environmental risk STP of ES 165.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.165.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1316. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 165.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.165.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1317. Worker risk of ES 165.3
10.165.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 4 Using a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product in an dedicated equipment; opportunity for exposure arises The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1318. Worker risk of ES 165.4
10.166 Scenario 166: Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. (AISE_CS_I05a, AISE_CS_I05b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.166 10.166.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.166.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1319. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 166.1
10.166.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1321. Environmental risk STP of ES 166.1
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.166.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1322. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 166.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.166.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.166.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1323. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 166.2
10.166.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1325. Environmental risk STP of ES 166.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.166.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1326. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 166.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.166.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1327. Worker risk of ES 166.3
10.166.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Pressure spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning, desinfectant or maintenance product. The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1328. Worker risk of ES 166.4
10.167 Scenario 167: Spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning or maintenance product during short time. (AISE_CS_I06) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.167 10.167.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning or maintenance product during short time. The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.167.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1329. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 167.1
10.167.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1331. Environmental risk STP of ES 167.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.167.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1332. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 167.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.167.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 7 Spraying of a diluted industrial cleaning or maintenance product during short time. The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1333. Worker risk of ES 167.2
10.168 Scenario 168: Brushing an industrial cleaning solution (AISE_CS_I07a, AISE_CS_I07b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.168 10.168.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Brushing an industrial cleaning solution The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.168.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1334. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 168.1
10.168.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1336. Environmental risk STP of ES 168.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.168.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1337. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 168.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.168.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Brushing an industrial cleaning solution The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.168.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1338. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 168.2
10.168.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1340. Environmental risk STP of ES 168.2
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.168.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1341. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 168.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.168.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing an industrial cleaning solution The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1342. Worker risk of ES 168.3
10.168.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing an industrial cleaning solution
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1343. Worker risk of ES 168.4
10.169 Scenario 169: Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) (AISE_CS_I08a, AISE_CS_I08b) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.169 10.169.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.169.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1344. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 169.1
10.169.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1346. Environmental risk STP of ES 169.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
10.169.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1347. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 169.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.169.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.169.2.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1348. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 169.2
10.169.2.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1350. Environmental risk STP of ES 169.2
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.169.2.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1351. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 169.2
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.169.3 Contributing Scenario (3) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1352. Worker risk of ES 169.3
10.169.4 Contributing Scenario (4) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 10 Brushing a diluted cleaning or maintenance product (after spraying) The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1353. Worker risk of ES 169.4
10.170 Scenario 170: Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with an industrial cleaning product (AISE_CS_I09) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.170 10.170.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with an industrial cleaning product The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.170.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1354. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 170.1
10.170.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1356. Environmental risk STP of ES 170.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.170.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources. Table 1357. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 170.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.170.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 13 Treatment of articles by dipping or pouring with an industrial cleaning product The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1358. Worker risk of ES 170.2
10.171 Scenario 171: Quality control on industrial cleaning, desinfectants and maintenance Products (AISE_CS_I10) The following RCR calculations refer to the contributing scenarios described in chapter 9.171 10.171.1 Contributing Scenario (1) controlling environmental exposure for ERC4 Quality control on industrial cleaning, desinfectants and maintenance Products The quantitative risk characterisation for this environmental exposure has been calculated using EasyTRA. The environmental exposure calculation per compartment is based on the algorithms of the EU TGD 2003 Risk Assessment Spreadsheet Model 1.24a. 10.171.1.1 Aquatic compartment (including sediment) Table 1359. Environmental risk aquatic of ES 171.1
10.171.1.3 Microbiological activity in sewage treatment systems Table 1361. Environmental risk STP of ES 171.1
Compartments PEC PNEC RCR = PEC/PNEC
MSafe kg/d
STP 0.443083 mg/L 1.00E4 mg/L 0.000044 1.13E6
10.171.1.4 Man via environment Secondary poisoning considers indirect exposure of man via foods, air and drinking water. The following table shows the calculated exposure to the substance from exemplary food sources at different trophic levels together with the total exposure over all routes and food sources.
2013-04-19 ECPA OWB 2.5 CHEMICAL SAFETY REPORT
Table 1362. Environmental risk man via environment of ES 171.1
Food source Exposure concentration (EC)
DNEL Risk characterisation ratio = EC/DNEL
MSafe kg/d
Fish 0.000086 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 5.70E-6 -
Root crop 0.000039 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.59E-6 -
Leaf crop 0.001876 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000125 -
Milk 6.01E-7 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 4.01E-8 -
Meat 3.23E-8 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 2.15E-9 -
Drinking water 0.001055 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.00007 -
inhalation 0.000047 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 3.12E-6 -
Total 0.003104 mg/kgbw/day
15 mg/kgbw/day 0.000207 2.42E5
10.171.2 Contributing Scenario (2) controlling industrial worker exposure for PROC 15 Quality control on industrial cleaning, desinfectants and maintenance Products The quantitative risk characterisation for this worker exposure has been calculated by EasyTRA. The following table shows the exposure estimations via the dermal and inhalatory route together with the total exposure of workers over all routes if applicable. Table 1363. Worker risk of ES 171.2