-
1
Review Article
Medicinal Plants Sources of Anticancer Drugs
Latifa Doudach1,2
, Bouchra Meddah1, Laila Benbacer
3, Layachi Chabraoui
4, My.A.
Faouzi1, Abdelhakim Elomri
2 and, Yahia Cherrah
1
1Mohammed V Souissi University of Rabat, Faculty of Medicine and
Pharmacy, Laboratory of
Pharmacology and Toxicology, Research Team pharmacokinetic,
Morocco
2University of Rouen, CNRS UMR 6014, C.O.B.R.A, UFR Medicine and
Pharmacy, 22
Boulevard Gambetta 76183 Rouen, France
3Biology Unit and Medical Research CNESTEN, PB 1382 RP, 10001
Rabat, Morocco
4Biochemical laboratory, Ibn Sina Hospital Rabat, Morocco.
*Corresponding authors: Pr. Bouchra Meddah, laboratory of
Pharmacology and Toxicology,
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V Souissi University,
Rabat, Morocco. Tel.:
+212 - 5 37 77 04 21, Fax: +212 5 37 77 37 01
E-mail address: [email protected]
-
2
Abstract
Medicinal plants continue to generate interest in
pharmacological research and development of
new anticancer agent. Approximately 64% of drugs used in cancer
chemotherapy are from
plants materials with different modes of action. This study
proposes to list the natural
compounds having the capacity to inhibit or reduce the
development of cancer in order to
identify their mechanisms of action and mode of signalization
involved in the process of
carcinogenesis, vinblastine, vincristine, topotecan, irinotecan,
etoposide, taxol and paclitaxel
are drugs derived from natural resources used in the treatment
of a wide variety of cancers.
Data on safety and efficacy are available for an even few number
of plants.
Keywords: Medicinal plants, natural products, drugs, cancer.
-
3
1. Introduction
Remedies made from plants constitute a promising avenue for the
development of drugs
traditionally improved. Estimations from the World Health
Organization (WHO) say that over
80% of the population use traditional medicine in health care
needs. In fact about 35000 to
70000 plant species are used for medical purposes in the world
[1]
and over 62% of new
biologically active substances are currently used as anticancer
agents made from natural
sources (plants, marine organisms and micro-organizations)
[2]
. Studies of separation and
chemical identification have revealed the pharmacological
potential of several medicinal plants
[3,4,5]. The plants are then a source of natural substances with
great potential of application and
whose physicochemical properties seem to be related to their
compositions of secondary
metabolites. Different therapeutic effects have been associated
with natural compounds and
have allowed the isolation of several phytoactive compounds
(polyphenols, terpenods,
alkaloids, glycosides and polysaccharides ...). Several studies
have documented the use of
plants in the Ethnotherapy and the treatment of several
diseases. The root bark extracts of
Calotropis procera, have been the target in multiple uses in
Burkina Faso, have demonstrated
antitumor activity [6]
. Several studies have reported the use of plants in the
treatment of
Ethnotherapy and other diseases. Hartwell has estimated the use
of over 3 000 plant species in
the treatment of cancer [7]
. Several chemotherapy drugs are isolated from medicinal
plants,
including the Vinca alkaloids, vinblastine and vincristine,
isolated from the plant of
Catharanthus roseus, etoposide and teniposide, semisyntheticaly
derivative from
epipodophyllotoxin isomer of podophyllotoxin (isolated from kind
of Podophyllum species),
taxanes isolated from Taxus species, the semisynthetic
derivatives of camptothecin: topotecan
and irinotecan, isolated from the plant Camptotheca acuminata
[8,9,10]
. Given the current
worldwide interest aroused by the use of medicinal plants to
fight disease and maintain health,
knowledge of these plants is now essential and is even crucial
in health sector and
-
4
pharmaceutical industry. Nature is a source not only of
potential chemotherapeutic agents and
lead compounds that have provided the basis and inspiration for
the semisynthesis or total
synthesis of effective new drugs, half of the existing
pharmaceuticals today are inspired by
natural products [11,12]
. The improvement of medicinal plants value can be achieved
by
searching newer, more effective and less toxic therapeutic
molecules, which will add great
values to the resources that can be later, integrated into the
therapeutic arsenal already in use.
This work represents a literature review exposing the interest
of the phytoactive isolated from
medicinal plants used as active principles for chemotherapy. The
identified active extracts are
standardized, will bear the different preclinical steps,
pharmaceutical, analytical, toxicological,
pharmacological and clinical according to current regulations.
The finished products will be
subject to authorization on the market (AMM) for its efficacy,
safety and pharmaceutical
quality. Therefore, the effectiveness of anticancer activity
phytoactifs to is reproducible to the
modern medicine, the doses are standardized contrary to
traditional medicine, the active
ingredients from plants in complex mixtures, undefined, cant
generate a comparable activity.
2. Medicinal Products Made from Aromatic and Medicinal
Plants
Most current cancer therapies involve the modulation of a single
target. The high cost of
conventional drugs and the desire to consume unprocessed
agricultural products, encouraged
the development of several alternative approaches. The use of
natural remedies, made from
plants, remains a very promising way to address health problems,
such as cancer and other
associated pathologies. Actually, several drugs derived from
natural sources are used in
chemotherapy (Table I), among the large classes of anticancer
drugs made from plants [13]
we
find:
2.1. Podophyllotoxin: Podophyllotoxin (1), isolated from plants
of the Berberidaceae family:
Podophyllum peltatum and Podophyllum hexandrum has given birth
after a few structural
changes, to three compounds: Teniposid (2), Etoposid (3) and
phosphate of etoposid widely
-
5
used in antitumor therapy [14]
, it is used against several types of tumors, including lung
cancer,
testicular, lymphoma, leukemia, sarcoma and Kaposi... the
mechanism of action of
podophyllotoxin is based on the inhibition of tubulin
polymerization, which causes the
inhibition of tubulin polymerization and hence microtubule
assembly, thus arresting the cell
cycle in metaphase [15,16]
. The podophyllotoxin derivatives induce apoptosis in
proliferating
cells by interacting with the topoisomerase II, homodimeric
enzyme controlling the degree of
supercoiling of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the etoposid
increases the number of double-
stranded cuts on DNA in proliferating cells [17]
. Alterations in DNA structure are associated
with activation of a protein kinase, ATM (ataxia telangiectasia
mutated kinase, which
stimulates the active form of the tumor suppressor protein p53,
leading to the cell cycle arrest
(en G2) and / or to apoptosis [18]
.
-
6
Podophyllotoxin (1) Podophyllotoxin (1)
Teniposid (2)Teniposid (2)
Etoposid (3)Etoposid (3)
2.2. Vinca alkaloids: The isolation of Vinca: vinblastine (4)
and vincristine (5) from the
Madagascar periwinkle, Catharanthus roseus G. Don. (Apocynaceae)
has introduced a new era
of using plant material as anticancer agents, these phytoactive
are used in combination for the
treatment of cancer, including cancer of leukemia, lymphomas,
testicular, breast, lung, and
Kaposi's sarcoma [19]
. The semi-synthetic analogues are vinorelbine (6) and vindesine
(7),
obtained from vindoline and catharanthine, which play beneficial
role for the treatment of
breast and lung cancers. Vinblastine and vincristine are the
first antimitotic identified drugs
causing a malformation of the mitotic spindle [20]
. They targeted the subunit of tubulin and
depolymerized microtubules.
-
7
Vinblastine (4)Vinblastine (4)
Vincristine (5)Vincristine (5)
Vinorelbine (6)Vinorelbine (6)
Vindesine(7)Vindesine(7)
-
8
Vinblastine and vincristine are commonly used in the treatment
of some cancers (testicular
cancer, Hodgkin's disease, acute lymphocytic leukemia).
Vinblastine binds to tubulin, the
protein of microtubules of the spindle. It inhibits the assembly
of microtubules, resulting in
dissolution of the mitotic spindle and the cell is then is
arrested in metaphase. In fact, by
binding to tubulin, vinblastine prevents some of his contacts to
settle; thus, the lateral contacts
between protofilaments, which are crucial for the stability of
microtubules, cannot be
established. Microtubules are hollow cylinders whose walls are
made of polymers (or
profilements) of tubulin, an abundant cellular heterodimeric
protein consisting of an subunit
and a subunit. A high concentration of vinblastine, when the
loss of microtubular contacts
becomes important, the tubulin assembles in spirals at the
expense of the formation of
microtubules. In these spirals, the link between tubulin
heterodimers is enhanced by contact
with vinblastine molecules, each molecule of vinblastine
interacts with the subunit of a
heterodimer and the subunit of the other forming a antimitotic
complex [21].
2.3. Camptothecin: Isolated in the early 1970's from the extract
of the bark of the tree
Camptotheca acuminata (Nyssaceae), an ornamental tree from
China, the camptothecin (8) is
highly toxic for clinical usage. It belongs to the category of
anticancer drugs that inhibit
topoisomerase I, a nuclear enzyme that allows supercoiled DNA to
relax, thus, allowing
replication, recombination, transcription and DNA repair
[22]
. The effect of camptothecin is to
stabilize a cleavable complex (ADNtopI) formed at many sites on
the double helix. Once
stabilized, the complex stops the replication fork, which, in
turn, leads to inhibition of DNA
synthesis and promotion of cell death. Camptothecin is a potent
inhibitor of the transcription of
ribosomal and messenger RNA. This inhibition is mainly due to
blockage of the elongation by
trapping the cleavage complex Topi / DNA. In studies conducted
on dhydrofolate reductase
(DHFR) in Chinese hamster, it appears that camptothecin
activates the initiation, but inhibits
the elongation of gene transcription. In human cells, inhibition
of transcription by camptothecin
-
9
is not uniform. While it strongly inhibits the promoter of the
endogenous gene c-MYC,
camptothecin has a minimal effect on the episomal gene c-MYC or
on the basal transcription of
HSP70 genes and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH). The inhibition of the
catalytic activity of the Topoisomerase can also prevent
transcription by appearance and
accumulation of supercoiled upstream of the transcription
complex RNA polymerase.
Topotecan (9) and irinotecan (10) are the synthetic analogues of
camptothecin. Topotecan is
used clinically for the treatment of ovarian and small cell lung
cancers. Once topoisomerase I
(top I) covalently linked to double-stranded DNA, the binding of
topotecan mimics a DNA
base by being inserted at the cleavage site [23]
. This interaction changes the position of the free
end of the 5'-OH DNA strand cut by banning a subsequent
religation. Irinotecan in turn is used
clinically for the treatment of colorectal cancer; the stability
of the lactone nucleus of irinotecan
is about 20 times higher than that of camptothecin [24]
, its action is to prevent the reconstitution
of stranded DNA after cleavage, thereby inhibiting the correct
synthesis of DNA. Indeed,
irinotecan binds to the cleavage complex formed by the top I-DNA
and inhibits the religation
of DNA fragments.
-
10
Camptothecin (8) Camptothecin (8)
N(CH3)2
Topotecan (9)
N(CH3)2
Topotecan (9)
Irinotecan (10)Irinotecan (10)
2.4. Taxoids: The structure of paclitaxel (11) has been
elucidated in 1971 and was introduced in
the clinic (U.S market) in the 1990s [25,26]
this molecule was isolated from the yew (Taxus
baccata). The Paclitaxel acts by inducing microtubule
polymerization and inhibiting their
depolymerization (subunit alpha and beta). This mechanism of
action leads to a mitotic arrest in
metaphase-anaphase stage, leading to the inhibition of
proliferation and promotion of cell death
[27]. At low concentrations, cell death occurs after an aberrant
mitosis, involving the p53
protein. Once p53 is activated, it acts as a transcription
factor that regulates the expression of
many components involved in the pathways of cell cycle
regulation. The p21WAF1/CIP1
protein, mostly known for its role as an inhibitor of CDK and
kinas proteins, plays also a key
role in the regulation of the cell cycle progression [28]
. P53 the gatekeeper of the genome,
induces the transcription of the p21WAF1/CIP1 protein that
blocks the passage of the cell from
G1 to S phase by inhibiting cyclin D-cdk complex. At high
concentrations, there is a mitotic
arrest in G2 / M phase. The accumulation of the mass of
microtubules in cells and the induction
-
11
of apoptosis through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP
kinase) or protein kinase A are
able to induce bcl2 phosphorylation by inhibiting its
anti-apoptotic action [29.30]
. Paclitaxel is
significantly active against ovarian cancer, advanced breast
cancer and lung cancer [26]
. The
semi-synthetic analogue of paclitaxel is docetaxel (12).
Paclitaxel (11)Paclitaxel (11)
Docetaxel (12)Docetaxel (12)
2.5. Colchicine: Colchicine (13), a tricyclic alkaloid isolated
in 1820 by PJ Pelletier and JB
Caventou from plants of Gloriosa superba L and Colchicum
autumnale, induces cell death by
arresting mitosis in metaphase by inhibiting tubulin
polymerization, the formation and function
of microtubules, and by forming combinations with tubulin
[31]
. Three proteins play a key role
in the pharmacokinetics of colchicine: tubulin, its elective
target; the cytochrome CYP3A4,
which is involved in its metabolism and ABCB1 protein, which
regulates its tissue distribution,
and renal and biliary excretion [32]
. Colchicine has a direct effect on P-glycoprotein, whose
particularity is to destroy tumor vasculature, causing their
necrosis [33]
. Effective doses of
phytoactive are close to the maximum tolerated dose; it induces
strong toxicity and significant
morbidity. Colchicine analogues are obtained by substituting one
or more radicals, giving
-
12
comparable efficacy and less toxicity: the
N-desacetyl-colchicine (14), the N-desacetyl-N-
methyl-colchicine (15), trimethyl-colchicine acid and
colchicoside (16).
R1 = COCH3; R2 = Me Colchicine (13)R1 = H; R2 = Me
N-desacetyl-colchicine (14)R1 = CH3; R2 = Me N-desacetyl- N-methyl
colchicine (15)R1 = COCH3; R2 = Glu Colchicoside (16)
R1 = COCH3; R2 = Me Colchicine (13)R1 = H; R2 = Me
N-desacetyl-colchicine (14)R1 = CH3; R2 = Me N-desacetyl- N-methyl
colchicine (15)R1 = COCH3; R2 = Glu Colchicoside (16)
3. Phytoactifs with Anticancer Activity
Natural substances allow the synthesis of selective analogues
with increased biological
properties [34,35]
, many phytoactive isolated from plants are currently in
clinical and preclinical
trials.
3.1. Betulinic acid: The betulinic acid (17), which is a
pentacyclic triterpene obtained from
many vegetal or synthetic species from betulin, a substance
found abundantly in certain species
of birch (Betula papyrifera). It displays anti-tumor activity
vis--vis the tumor cell lines and
against other melanocytic tumors ectodermal Such as
neuroblastoma, glioma, medulloblastoma
and Ewing sarcoma [36]
. The mechanism of action of betulinic acid is mainly manifested
by the
induction of apoptosis through proteolytic cleavage of caspases
3 and 8, which is preceded by
the appearance of mitochondrial events and the generation of
reactive substances of oxygen,
involving an apoptotic pathway and a mitochondrial phase
[37]
. The betulinic acid has
interesting therapeutic and anticancer activities. It inhibits
the enzyme involved in the
mechanism of DNA repair. Thus, the activity of bleomycin (an
antitumor agent) that acts by
damaging the DNA of cancer cells is accentuated in the presence
of betulinic acid [38]
.
-
13
Betulinic acid (17) Betulinic acid (17)
3.2. Curcumin: Curcumin or diferuloylmethane (18) isolated from
the plant Curcuma longa L.
plays interesting roles in the treatment of cancer; moreover, it
has an anti-angiogenic action,
which could explain its chemopreventive effect [39]
. The anticancer potential of curcumin
results from its ability to stop the proliferation and
metastasis of a variety of tumor cells by
inhibiting adhesion molecules and consequently angiogenesis, a
cellular process and a crucial
step in the growth and the metastasis of many cancers. This
polyphenol inhibit also the activity
of cyclin D1, a proto-oncogene overexpressed in many cancers at
higher concentrations.
Curcumin induces apoptosis by blocking the effect of proteins
that regulate this process and by
modulating transcription factors. Human clinical trials
indicated no dose-limiting toxicity (up to
10 g / day) and a huge anti-cancer potential of curcumin
demonstrated in vitro (in italics) on
various tumor cell lines [40]
.
Curcumin (18) Curcumin (18)
3.3. Lapachol: The Lapachol (19) is a phytoactive isolated from
avellanedae Tabebuia
(Bignoniaceae), tree of South Africa. Highly active against a
variety of cancer cells, it blocks
tumor growth at micromolar doses and inhibits invasion and
metastasis of cancer cells by
-
14
altering the protein profiles of invasive cells. The
cytotoxicity of this active compound on
hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) is significant, and induces
apoptosis of these cells by
caspase activation [41.42]
. Topoisomerase I and II are the elective targets of this
phytoactive, that
effective for the treatment of many types of cancer (breast,
prostate and pancreas).
Lapachol (19) Lapachol (19)
3.4. Ellipticine: Ellipticine (5,11-dimethyl-6H-pyrido (4,3-b)
carbazole) (20), an alkaloid
isolated from plants of Ochrosia borbonica, Excavatia coccinea
and Ochrosia elliptica from
the family of Apocynaceae, used in cancer chemotherapy for the
treatment of a wide variety of
cancers. The main mechanism of action of ellipticine is the
inhibition of topoisomerase II.
Ellipticine has the ability to bind to proteins and induce the
cytotoxic harmful free radicals to
the body [43]
; moreover, Ellipticine inhibit the cytochrome P4501A1 [44]
and activate the
transcription of the mutant protein P53. Recently, it has been
shown that ellipticine derivatives
can induce stress of the endoplasmic reticulum of cells, and
suggest that stress is a contributing
factor to the cytotoxic activity of this class of inhibitors of
topoisomerase II. This phytoactive
inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis of cancer cells of
hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2)
[45].
Ellipticine (20) Ellipticine (20)
-
15
3.5. Combretastatin A4: Combretastatin A4 (CA4) (21), isolated
from the bark of a South
African tree Combretum caffrum, is an antimitotic agent in
cancer cells and selectively inhibits
tubulin polymerization of tumor endothelial cells [46]
. Indeed, disruption of microtubule
cytoskeleton in the CA4 inhibits cell division of endothelial
cells in the proliferative phase and
induces apoptosis of this latter. This product induces cell
cycle arrest in the growth phase (G2)
or mitosis (M) and acts on the cell proliferation phase and not
on the cell quiescent phase [47]
.
Combretastatin A4 also acts on the vasculature of solid tumors.
It induces the specific
destruction of blood vessels and inhibit the formation of new
vessels or anti-angiogenesis [48]
.
The phenstatin (22) is an analogue of the CA4 and whose
cytotoxic activity is very important.
The CA4 is currently in Phase III of clinical trials as a
phosphate product. The combretastatin
A4 phosphate (CA4-P) is an antitubulin agent used for its
anti-angiogenic and antivascular
properties.
Combretastatin A4 (21) Combretastatin A4 (21)
Phenstatin (22) Phenstatin (22)
3.6. Flavopiridol: Flavopiridol (23), a semi-synthetic compound
derived from the rohitukine
(24), is an alkaloid isolated from the bark of a plant widely
used in India, Dysoxylum
binectariferum. Flavopiridol acts by inhibiting the
cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk 1, 2 and 4) [49]
.
Indeed, it binds competitively to the receptors of adenosine
triphosphate (ATP), necessary for
the activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and inhibits
the phosphorylation of the
amino acid threonine of Cdks (this phosphorylation is required
for the activation of Cdks).
Flavopiridol induces apoptosis of several cell lines;
furthermore, it reduces the levels of cyclin
-
16
D1 and inhibit angiogenesis [50,51]
through a decrease in the matrix metalloproteinases
secretion
leading to the inhibition of c-erbB-2 gene expression.
Overexpression of this gene (c-erbB-2) in
breast cancers is correlated with invasion and metastatic
progression of these tumors [52]
through alteration of the stability of ribonucleic acids (mRNAs)
encoding the vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which represent a
pathophysiological stimulus for the
induction of angiogenesis in vivo [53]
. Flavopiridol acts synergistically with several
conventional antitumor drugs. It potentiates the proapoptotic
effect of Mitomycin C and
paclitaxel by having a chemopreventive effect of chromosomal
abnormalities and genetic
instability induced by paclitaxel [54]
. Flavopiridol is currently in Phase I and II of clinical
trials,
and it is used for the treatment of a wide variety of cancers,
including breast, stomach,
leukemia, lymphomas and solid tumors [55]
.
Flavopiridol (23) Flavopiridol (23)
Rohitukine (24) Rohitukine (24)
3.7. Roscovitine: Roscovitine (25), a synthetic derivative of
olomoucine (26), is a natural
product isolated from the plant Raphanus sativus L. Roscovitine
initiates the blockage of the
cell cycle in phase G0, G1 and S and in the transition phase G2
/ M, leading to the inhibition of
CDK / cyclin complexes, a protein involved in the regulation of
cell cycle [56]
. Roscovitine
inhibits the activity of CDK7, which in turn inhibits the
phosphorylation of threonine of CDK1
2 and 4, leading to the prevention of the catalytic activity of
the CDK2/cyclineE complex. This
inactivation will lead to a lack of phosphorylation required for
the degradation of the natural
inhibitor p27KIP1, whose stability helps in maintaining its role
as an inhibitor of CDK2 and
-
17
CDK4 and thus blocking the cell cycle in G1. Roscovitine is also
responsible for stopping cell
division through the deregulation of the activity of CDKs,
leading to the blockage of DNA
replication, the formation of the nucleolus, the duplication of
centrosome, the fragmentation of
the Golgi apparatus and finally the rupture of the nuclear
envelope, thus, leading to cell death,
characterized by caspase activation and cytochrome C release.
This product is used to treat
breast and lung cancers. In Europe, roscovitine is in phase II
in clinical trials [19, 57]
.
Roscovitine (25) Roscovitine (25)
Olomoucine (26) Olomoucine (26)
3.8. Daphnoretin: Daphnoretin (27) belongs to the class of
bicoumarines, mainly found in
Thymelaeaceae, but also in legumes and Rutaceae [58]
. Historically, daphnoretin (3.7 '-
dicoumarylester), is the first of bicoumarine Thymelaeaceae,
isolated in 1963 from the berries
of Daphne mezereum and leaves of Daphnopsis racemosa [59]
. Subsequently, the same group of
researchers isolated the 6-glycoside of daphnoretin called
daphnorine of Daphne mezereum [60]
.
In 1986, Chakrabarti and al. have isolated the Acetyl
daphnoretin [61]
, while qu'ulubelen et al [62]
identified the dimethyl daphnoretine extracted from Daphne
gnidioides Szovits ex Meisson.
Several biological activities have been attributed to the
Daphnoretin, including antiviral
activity, initiated by the inhibition of the expression of viral
antigens (HBsAg) expressed on the
surface of target cells (human hepatoma Hep B Cells), via a
mechanism of activation of the
protein kinase C (PKC) pathway [63]
. It was also shown that Daphnorrtin is also able to
significantly inhibit the growth of cancerous ascites via
inhibition of DNA synthesis and
protein of cancer cells [64]
. An anticancer activity was also attributed to Daphnoretine.
Indeed,
-
18
in several tumor models, the daphnortine appears to inhibit the
kinase activity of hEGF
receptors (Human Epidermal Growth Factor receptor). Considering
his medical interest, several
studies are now optimizing the extraction methods of Daphnoretin
from different natural
resources. Wikstroemia indica (L.) is a model of choice that
contains a lot that could serve as a
prototype with important medical and nutritional value [65]
. These authors confirmed the anti-
cancer effect of Daphnoretin on cancer cell lines of cervical
HeLa, the human lung
adenocarcinoma cell A549, cells of neuroendocrine carcinoma
(NEC) and tumor cells HE-p2
[65].
Daphnoretin (27) Daphnoretin (27)
3.9. Salvicine: The Salvicine (28) is derived from the
structurally modified diterpenequinone,
isolated from Salvia prionitis Hance. The salvicine has been
widely described for its antitumor
activity in vitro and in vivo [66.67]
. Using several tumor models, the salvicine showed a broad
spectrum anti MDR (Multi Drug Resistance) and antimetastatic
[68.69]
. Functionally, the
salvicine inhibits the catalytic activity of a human enzyme,
topoisomerase II (htopo II) which
causes DNA cleavage. The htopo II is highly expressed in
proliferating cells and plays a crucial
role in replication, transcription and organization of
chromosomes [70,71,72]
. Its depletion leads to
cell death [71.72]
. Thus, this nuclear enzyme, highly conserved, is an important
target for cancer
chemotherapy. Approximately 50% of drugs used in cancer
chemotherapy are the htopo II
[73,74,75]. The salvicine inhibits htopo II by binding to the
ATPase domain of the enzyme,
competing with ATP and ADP.Competitive inhibition experiments
show that blocking ATP in
a dose-dependent way and competitive to the setting the
salvicine the domain of the enzyme
-
19
ATP-ase, indicating that the salvicine and ATP use the same
binding site on 'htopo II. In tumor
cells, the salvicine induced gene-specific DNA damage and
triggers cell apoptosis by
modulating the expression of various genes, including-myc,
c-fos, c-JNK, c-jun, and mdr1
[76,77,78].
Salvicine (28) Salvicine (28)
4. Conclusion
The rapid progress made in cell and molecular biology over the
last thirty years played a major
role in better understanding the functioning of cancer cells. As
a result, more specific
treatments have been developed, and it has become possible to
target more precisely the
processes involved in the development, proliferation and
survival of tumor cells. A better
understanding of the characteristics of tumor cells has recently
led to the development of more
targeted treatments, and therefore generally less toxic. This
may include conventional cytotoxic
molecules targeting non-specific molecules expressed on the
surface of cancer cells and at less
degree in normal proliferating cells (DNA, enzymes,
microtubules...), or of molecules directed
against targets specific to cancer cells (oncogenes). At the
present time and given the current
worldwide interest aroused by the use of natural resources,
especially medicinal plants used to
fight disease and maintain health, a knowledge of these plants
is now essential and has a major
importance in health sector and pharmaceutical industry. In
medicine, particularly in the field
of cancer, the use of herbs is increasingly enhanced especially
with the excessive use of
synthetic drugs and awareness of their toxicity, which
contributed in oncology, leading to a
-
20
favorable reconsideration of the medicinal practices made from
natural herbal. Several research
studies have led to the discovery and development of new active
ingredients from natural
molecules (or derivatives) and several of these compounds are
used today in clinical practice.
However, apart from the cytotoxic effect of new anticancer
agents, only the pre-clinical and
clinical tests that contrasts in their use as new anticancer
drugs and thus their integration into
the existing therapeutic armamentarium. In conclusion, the use
of naturally occurring
molecules in the treatment of cancer has greatly contributed to
the improvement of the
therapeutic efficacy of drugs used today in cancer chemotherapy.
Similarly, the
pharmacognosy, which contributed to the improvement of the
knowledge of natural medicines,
and to the development of this sector, which offers to the
modern medicine great potentials for
progress, based on the discovery and development of new
anticancer molecules based on
natural substances.
Conflict of Interest Statement
There is no conflict of interest associated with the authors of
this paper, and the fund sponsors
did not cause any inappropriate influence on this work.
References
1. S. Bhattarai, R.P. Chaudhary, C.L. Quave and R. S. L. Taylor.
The use of medicinal plants
in the Trans-Himalayan arid zone of Mustang district, Nepal,
Journal of Ethnobiology and
Ethnomedicine, vol. 6, no.14, 2010.
2. G.F. Gonzales and L.G. Valerio, Medicinal plants from Peru: a
review of plants as potential
agents against cancer. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal
Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 429-444,
2006.
3. E. S. Fiala, B. S. Reddy and J. H. Weisburger, Naturally
occurring anticarcinogenic
substances in foodstuffs. Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 5,
pp. 295-321, 1985.
-
21
4. L. C. Tapsell, I. Hemphill, L. Cobiac, C. S. Patch, D. R.
Sullivan, M. Fenech, S. Enrys, J. B.
Keogh, P. M. Clifton, P. G. Williams, V. A. Fazio and K. E.
Inge, Health benefits of herbs and
spices: The past, the present, the future. The Medica Journal of
Australia, vol. 185, no. 4, pp.
S4-S24, 2006.
5. V. Triggiani, F. Resta, E. Guastamacchia, C. Sabba, B.
Licchelli, S. Ghiyasaldin, et al.,
Role of antioxidants, essential fatty acids, carnitine,
vitamins, phytochemicals and trace
elements in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and its chronic
complications. Endocrine,
Metabolic and Immune Disorders Drug Targets, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.
77-93, 2006.
6. E. Van-Quaquebeke, G. Simon, A. Andre, J. Dewelle, M. E.
Yazidi, F. Bruyneel, J. Tuti, O.
Nacoulma, P. Guissou and C. Decaestecker, Identification of a
novel cardenolide (2''-
oxovoruscharin) from Calotropis procera and the hemisynthesis of
novel derivatives displaying
potent in vitro antitumor activities and high in vivo tolerance:
structure-activity relationship
analyses. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 3, pp.
849-56, 2005.
7. J.L. Hartwell, Plants Used Against Cancer, pp. 709, 1982.
Lawrence, Massachusetts: This
book lists plants reported to possess anticancer activity,
covering up to 1971. It has been
updated by Farnsworth et al. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol.
73, pp. 347-377, 2000.
8. G.M. Cragg, S.A. Schepartz, M. Suffness and M.R. Grever, The
taxol supply crisis. New
NCI policies for handling the large-scale production of novel
natural product anticancer and
anti-HIV agents, Journal of Natural Products, vol. 56, no. 10,
pp. 1657-1668, 1993.
9. G.M. Cragg, M.R. Boyd, J.H. Cardellina, D.J. Newman, K.M.
Snader and T.G. McCloud,
Ethnobotany and drug discovery experience of the US National
Cancer Institute. In: Chadwick,
D.J. Marsh and J. (Eds.), Ciba Foundation Ethnobotany and the
search for new drugs
Symposium, vol. 185. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp.
178-196, 1994.
-
22
10. H.K. Wang, Plant-derived anticancer agents currently in
clinical use or clinical trials. The
Investigation Drugs Journal, vol. 1, pp. 92-102, 1998.
11. G.M. Cragg, P.G. Grothaus, and D. J. Newman, Impact of
natural products on developing
new anti-cancer agents, Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, no. 7, pp.
3012-3043. 2009.
12. J. W. H. Li, J. C. Vederas. Drug discovery and natural
products: end of an era or an
endless frontier? , Science, vol. 325, no. 5937, pp. 161-165,
2009.
13. A. Amin, H. Gali-Muhtasib, M. Ocker a nd R. Schneider-Stock,
Overview of Major
Classes of Plant-Derived Anticancer Drugs, International Journal
of Biomedical Science, vol.
5, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2009.
14. B.F. Issell, A.R. Rudolph and A.C. Louie, Etoposide
(VP-16-213): an overview. In B.F.
Issell, F.M. Muggia, and S.K. Carter, (eds.), Etoposide
(VP-16-213) Current status and new
developments, Academic Press Inc, pp. 1-13, 1984.
15. D.C. Ayres and J.D. Loike, Lignans, chemical, biological and
clinical properties,
Cambridge University Press, 1990.
16. M. Gordaliza, M. A. Castro, J. M. Miguel Del Corral and A.
San Feliciano, Antitumor
properties of podophyllotoxin and related compounds, Current
Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 6,
pp. 1811-39, 2000.
17. A. Montecucco and G. Biamonti, Cellular response to
etoposide treatment. Cancer
Letters, vol. 252, no. 1, pp. 9-18, 2007.
18. P.A. Sung, J. Libura and C. Richardson; Etoposide and
illegitimate DNA double-strand
break repair in the generation of MLL translocations, new
insights and new questions. DNA
Repair vol. 5, no. 9-10, pp. 1109-18, 2006.
-
23
19. G.M. Cragg and D.J. Newman, Plants as source of anticancer
agents. Journal of
Ethnopharmacology, vol. 100, pp. 72-79, 2005.
20. K.W. Wood, W.D. Cornwell and J.R. Jackson, Past and future
of the mitotic spindle as an
oncology target, Current Opinion in Pharmacology , vol. 1, no.
4, pp. 370-7. 2001.
21. B. Gigant, C. Wang, R.B. Ravelli, et al., Structural basis
for the regulation of tubulin by
vinblastine. Nature. vol. 435, no. 7041, pp. 519-22, 2005.
22. M.E Wall, M.C. Wani, A.W. Nicholas , G. Manikumar, C. Tele,
l. Moore , A. Truesdale, P.
Leitner, and J.M Besterman, Plant antitumor agents: synthesis
and structure activity of novel
camptothecin analogs, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 36,
pp. 2689-700, 1993.
23. G.S. Laco, Evaluation of Two Models for Human Topoisomerase
I Interaction with
dsDNA and Camptothecin Derivatives. Journal.pone, vol. 6, no. 8,
pp. 1-7, 2011.
24. C.J. Thomas, N.J. rahier and Hecht, Camptothecin: current
perspectives, Bioorganic and
Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1585-604, 2004.
25. M.C. Wani, H.L. Taylor, M.E. Wall, P. Coggon and A.T.
McPhail, Plant antitumor agents.
VI. The isolation and structure of Taxol, a novel antileukemic
and antitumor agent from Taxus
brevifolia. Journal of the American Chemical Society. Soc., vol.
93, no. 9, pp. 2325-2337,
1971.
26. E. K. Rowinsky, L. B. Grochow, C. B. Hendricks, D. S.
Ettinger, A. A. Forastiere, L. A.
Hurowitz, W. P. McGuire, S. E. Sartorius, B. G. Lubejko, S. H.
Kaufmann, and R. C.
Donehower, Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan: a novel
topoisomerase I
inhibitor, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 10, no. 4,
647-656, 1992.
-
24
27. I. Ringel, S.B. Horwitz, "Taxol is Converted to 7-Epitaxol,
a Biologically Active isomer, in
Cell Culture Medium", Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental
therapeutics, vol. 242, no.
1, pp. 692-698, 1987.
28. F. Teyssier, J.O. Bay, C. Dionet and P. Verrelle, Rgulation
du cycle cellulaire des cellules
exposes aux radiations ionisantes. Bulletin du Cancer. vol. 86,
no. 4, pp.345-57, 1999.
29. K. Torres and S. Band Horwitz; Mechanisms of Taxol-induced
cell death are
concentration dependant. Cancer Research, vol. 58, pp. 3620-6,
1998.
30. T.K. Yeung, C. Germond, X. Chen and Z. Wang, The mode of
action of Taxol: apoptosis
at low concentration and necrosis at high concentration.
Biochemical and Biophysical
Research Communications, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 398-404, 1999.
31. D. L. Sackett and J. K. Varma. Molecular mechanism of
colchicine action: induced local
unfolding of beta-tubulin. Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 49, pp.
13560-13565, 1993.
32. E. Niel and J. M. Scherrmann, Colchicine today, Joint Bone
Spine, vol. 73, no. 6, pp.
672-8, 2006.
33. I. Arnal, I. Sassoon and R. Tournebize. Dynamique du fuseau,
vers une cible anti-
cancreuse, mdecine/sciences, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1227-35,
2002.
34. J. Mann, Natural products in cancer chemotherapy: past,
present and future. Nature
Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, pp. 143-148, 2002.
35. M. S. Butler, Natural products to drugs: natural product
derived compounds in clinical
trials. Natural Product Reports, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 162-195,
2005
36. V. Spataro and C. Sessa, Developing new anti-cancer drugs:
novel targets and
methodological problems. Forum (Genova), vol. 9, no. 3, pp.
200-9, 1999.
-
25
37. S. Fulda, C. Friesen, M. Los, et al., Betulinic acid
triggers CD95 (APO-1/Fas)- and p53-
independent apoptosis via activation of caspases in
neuroectodermal tumors. Cancer
Research, vol. 57, pp. 4956-64, 1997.
38. J. Ma, S. R. Starck, S. M. Hecht, DNA polymerase p
inhibitors from Tetracera
Boiviniana, Journal of Natural Products, Vol. 62, no. 12, pp.
1660-1663, 1999.
39. A. Duvoix, R. Blasius, S. Delhalle, M. Schnekenburger, F.
Morceau, E. Henry, M. Dicato,
and M. Diederich, Chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of
curcumin. Cancer Letters,
vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 181-190. 2005.
40. B.B. Aggarwal, A. Kumar, and A. C Bharti. Anticancer
potential of curcumin: preclinical
and clinical studies. Anticancer Research, vol. 23, no. 1,
363-398, 2003.
41. T. Matsura, M. Kai, Y. Fujii, H. Ito and K. Yamada. Hydrogen
peroxide-induced apoptosis
in HL-60 cells requires caspase-3 activation. Free Radical
Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 73-83,
1999.
42. H.J. Woo, K.Y. Park and C.H. Rhu, Beta-lapachone, a quinone
isolated from Tabebuia
avellanedae, induces apoptosis in HepG2 hepatoma cell line
through induction of Bax and
activation of caspase. Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 9, no. 2,
pp. 161-168, 2006.
43. P. Kovacic, J.R. Ames, P. Lumme, et al.; Charge transfer-oxy
radical mechanism for anti-
cancer agents. Anticancer Drug Design, vol. 1, pp. 197214, 1986.
J. Ma, S. R. Starck, S. M.
Hecht DNA polymerase p inhibitors from Tetracera Boiviniana,
Journal of Natural Products,
vol. 62, pp. 1660-1663, 1999.
44. P. Lesca, E. Rafidinarivo, P. Lecointe, and D. Mansuy; A
class of strong inhibitors of
microsomal monooxygenases: the ellipticines. Chemico-Biological
Interactions, vol. 24, pp.
189 97, 1979.
-
26
45. Y.C. Kuo, P.L. Kuo, Y.L. Hsu, C.Y. Cho, and C.C. Lin,
Ellipticine induces apoptosis
through p53-dependent pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma
HepG2 cells. Life
Sciences, vol. 78, pp. 2550-2557, 2006.
46. C.M. Lin, H.H. Ho, G.R. Pettit, and E. Hamel, Antimitotic
natural products combretastatin
A-4 and combretastatin A-2: studies on the mechanism of their
inhibition of the binding of
colchicine to tubulin. Biochemistry, vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 69-84,
1989.
47. G.G. Dark, S.A. Hill, V.E. Prise et al.; Combretastatin A-4,
an agent that displays potent
and selective toxicity toward tumor vasculature, Cancer
Research, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1829-
1834, 1997.
48. A.J. Hayes, L.Y. Li, and M.E. Lippman, Science, medicine,
and the future. Antivascular
therapy: a new approach to cancer treatment. British Medical
Journal, vol. 318, no. 7187, pp.
853-6, 1999.
49. A. Lansiaux and C. Bailly, Le flavopiridol, une protine
kinase dpendante des cyclines.
Bulletin du Cancer. vol 87, no 10, pp. 697-701, 2000.
50. L.R. Kelland, Flavopiridol, the first cyclic-dependent
kinase inhibitor to enter the clinic:
current status. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. vol. 9, pp. 2903-11,
2000.
51. S.S. Zhai, E.A. Sausville et al., Clinical pharmacology and
pharmacogenetics of
flavopiridol 1-h i.v. infusion in patients with refractory
neoplasms. Anticancer Drugs vol. 14,
no. 2, pp.125-35, 2003.
52. M. Tan, J. Yao, and D.Yu, Over expression of the c-erbB-2
gene enhanced intrinsic
metastasis potential in human breast cancer cells without
increasing their transformation
abilities. Cancer Research, vol. 57, pp. 1199-205. 1997.
-
27
53. G. Melillo, E.A. Sausville, K. Cloud, T. Lahusen, L.
Varesio, and A.M. Senderowicz,
Flavopiridol, a protein kinase inhibitor, down-regulates hypoxic
induction of vascular
endothelial growth factor expression in human monocytes. Cancer
Research, 59, no. 21,
5433-7, 1999.
54. M. Motwani, X. Li, and G.K. Schwartz, Flavopiridol, a
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor,
prevents spindle inhibitor-induced endoreduplication in human
cancer cells. Clinical Cancer
Research, vol. 6, pp. 924-32, 2000.
55. MC. Christian, JM. Pluda, TC. Ho, SG. Arbuck, AJ. Murgo, and
EA. Sausville, Promising
new agents under development by division of cancer treatment,
diagnosis, and centers of the
National Cancer Institute, Seminars in Oncology, vol. 13, no. 2,
pp. 2643-2655, 1997.
56. L. Meijer, K. Bettayeb and H. Galons, R-roscovitine (CYC202,
Seliciclib). In Monographs
on enzyme inhibitors, Volume 2. CDK inhibitors and their
potential as anti-tumor agents (E.
Yue and P.J. Smith, editors). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis,
chapter 9, pp. 187-226. 2006.
57. L. Meijer and E. Raymond, Roscovitine and other purines as
kinase inhibitors. From
starfish oocytes to clinical trials, Accounts of Chemical
Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 417-425,
2003.
58. M.M. Badawi, S.S. Handa, A.D. Kinghorn, G.A. Cordell, and
N.R. Farnsworth, Plant
anticancer agents XXVVII: antileukemic and cytotoxic
constituents of Dircaoccidentalis
(Thymelaeaceae), Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 72,
no. 11, pp. 1285- 1287, 1983.
59. R. Tschesche, U. Schacht, G. Legler, ber Daphnoretin, ein
natrlich vorkommendes
Derivat des 3,7-Dicumarylthers. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, vol.
662, pp. 113-125, 1963.
60. R. Tschesche, U. Schacht, G. Legler,ber Daphnorin, ein neues
Cumaringlukosid aus
Daphne mezereum. Naturwissenschaften, vol. 50, pp. 521-522,
1963.
-
28
61. R. Chakrabarti, B. Das, J. Banerji, Bis-coumarins from
Edgeworthia gardneri,
Phytochemistry, vol. 25, pp. 557-558, 1986.
62. A. Ulubelen, B. Terem, and E. Tuzlaci, Coumarins and
Flavonoids from Daphne
gnidioides, Journal of natural products, vol. 49, no. 4, pp.
692-694, 1986.
63. H.C. Chen., C.K. Chou, Y.H Kuo. and S.F. Yeh, Identification
of a protein kinase C
(PKC) activator, daphnoretin that suppresses hepatitis B virus
gene expression in human
hepatoma cells, Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 52, no. 7, pp.
1025- 1032, 1996.
64. Y.F. Liou, I.H. Hall, K.H. Lee Antitumor agents LIV: the
effects of daphnoretinon in vitro
protein synthesis of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells and other
tissues. Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 745- 749, 1982.
65. Chuan-Li Lu, Yan-Min Li, Guo-Qiang Fu, Li Yang, Jian-Guo
Jiang, Liang Zhu, Fu-Lan
Lin, Jian Chen, Qing-Shen Lin, Extraction optimisation of
Daphnoretin from root bark of
Wikstroemia indica (L) C.A. and its anti-tumour activity tests,
Food Chemistry, vol. 124, pp.
1500-1506, 2011.
66. C. Qing, JS. Zhang, and J. Ding, In vitro cytotoxicity of
salvicine, a novel diterpenoid
quinine, Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao, vol. 20, no.4, pp. 297-302,
1999.
67. J.S. Zhang, J. Ding, Q.M. Tang, M. Li, M. Zhao, L.J. Lu, LJ
Chen, and S.T. Yuan,
Synthesis and antitumour activity of novel diterpenequinone
salvicine and the analogs,
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 9, no. 18,
pp. 2731-2736, 1999.
68. Z.H. Miao, T. Tang, Y.X. Zhang, J.S. Zhang, and J. Ding,
Cytotoxicity, apoptosis
induction and downregulation of MDR-1 expression by the
anti-topoisomerase II agent,
salvicine, in multidrug-resistant tumor cells. International
Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 1,
pp. 108-115, 2003.
-
29
69. J.Y. Lang, H. Chen, J. Zhou, Y.X. Zhang, X.W. Zhang, M.H.
Li, L.P. Lin, J.S. Zhang, M.P.
Waalkes, and J. Ding, Antimetastatic effect of salvicine on
human breast cancer MDA-MB-435
orthotopic xenograft is closely related to Rho-dependent
pathway. Clinical Cancer Research,
vol. 11, no.9, pp. 3455-3464, 2005.
70. C.A. Austin and K.L. Marsh, Eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase II.
BioEssays, vol.20, no. 3,
pp. 215-226, 1998.
71. Wang JC, Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular
perspective. Nature
Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 430-440,
2002.
72. AJ. Carpenter and AC. Porter, Construction,
characterization, and complementation of a
conditional-lethal DNA topoisomerase II alpha mutant human cell
line, Molecular and
Cellular Biology, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5700- 5711, 2004.
73. Y. Pommier, M.R. Fesen, and F. Goldwasser, in Cancer
Chemotherapy and Biotherapy:
Principles and Practice , (Chabner BA and Longo DL eds), pp.
435-461, 1996. Lippincott-
Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
74. TR Hammonds, A Maxwell, and JR Jenkins, Use of a rapid
throughput in vivo screen to
investigate inhibitors of eukaryotic topoisomerase II enzymes,
Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 889-894, 1998.
75. A.M. Wilstermann and N. Osheroff, Stabilization of
eukaryotic topoisomerase II-DNA
cleavage complexes, Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol.
3, no. 3, pp. 321-338, 2003.
76. L.H. Meng, J.S. Zhang, and J. Ding, Induction of bulk and
c-myc P2 promoterspecific
DNA damage by an anti-topoisomerase II agent salvicine is an
early event leading to apoptosis
in HL-60 cells. FEBS Lett, vol. 501, no. 1, pp. 59-64, 2001.
-
30
77. Z.H. Miao and J. Ding, Transcription factor C-Jun activation
represses Mdr-1 gene
expression. Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 4527-4532,
2003.
78. H.R. Lu, L.H. Meng, M. Huang, H. Zhu, Z.H. Miao, and J.
Ding, DNA damage, c-myc
suppression and apoptosis induced by the novel topoisomerase II
inhibitor, salvicine, in human
breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol vol. 55,
no. 3, pp. 286-294, 2005.
79. A. Aigner, S.S. Hsieh, C. Malerczyk, and F. Czubayko.
Reversal of HER-2 over-
expression renders human ovarian cancer cells highly resistant
to taxol. Toxicology, vol. 144,
no. (1-3), pp. 221228, 2000.
80. K. Prabhakar, S. Ganesh, V. Baheti, S. Saisivam, Y.
Madhusudan Rao and V. Kishan.
Preparation and in vitro cytotoxic evaluation of taxol
immunoconjugates. Indian journal of
biotechnology. Vol. 6, pp 463-468, 2007.
81. Yang Zhen-yu, Guo Wei, Wu Dong-yuan, Du Zhi-min, Study on
Extraction, Isolation and
Anti-tumor Activity of Daphnoretin from Wikstroemia indica.
Natural Product Research &
Development, vol. 20, no. 3, p522, 2004.
82. MJ. Towle, KA. Salvato, J. Budrow, BF. Wels, G. Kuznetsov,
KK. Aafls, S. Welsh, W.
Zheng, BM. Seletsky, MH. Palme, GJ. Habgood, LA. Si,ger, LV.
Dipietro, Y. Wang, JJ. Chen,
DA. Quincy, A. Davis, K. Yoshimatsu, Y. Kishi, MJ. Yu, and BA.
Littlefield, In vitro and in
vivo anticancer activities of synthetic macro cyclicketone
analogues of halichondrin B,
Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1013-1021, 2001.
83. LH. Zhang, L. Wu, HK. Raymon, RS. Chen, L. Corral, MA.
Shirley, R K. Narla, J. Gamez,
GW. Muller, DI. Stirling, JB. Bartlett, PH. Schafer, and F.
Pawandi, The Synthetic Compound
CC-5079 Is a Potent Inhibitor of Tubulin Polymerization and
Tumor Necrosis Factor-A
Production with Antitumor Activity, Cancer Research, vol. 66,
no. 2, pp. 951-959, 2006.
-
31
84. BW. Parker, G. Kaur, W. Nieves-Neira, M. Taimi, G.
Kohlhagen, T.Shimizu, MD.
Losiewicz, Y. Pommier, EA. Sausville, and AM. Senderowic, Early
Induction of Apoptosis in
Hematopoietic Cell Lines After Exposure to Flavopiridol, Blood,
vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 458-465,
1998.
85. V. Smith, F. Raynaud, P. Workman, and LR. Kelland,
Characterization of a Human
Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Line with Acquired Resistance to
Flavopiridol, Molecular
Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 885893, 2001.
86. V. Srivastava, AS. Negi, JK. Kumar, MM. Gupta and SP.
Khanula, Plant-based anticancer
molecules: A chemical and biological profile of some important
leads, Bioorganic&
Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 58925908, 2005.
87. D. Marko, S. Schtzle, A. Friedel, A. Genzlinger, H. Zankl,
L. Meijer and G Eisenbrand,
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) by indirubin
derivatives in human tumour
cells, British Journal of Cancer, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 283289,
2001.
88. AB. da Rocha, RM. Lopes and G. Schwartsmann, Natural
products in anticancer therapy,
Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 1, no.4, pp. 364369,
2001.
89. M. Stiborov, J. Poljakov, E. Martnkov, L. Boek-dohalsk, T.
Eckschlager, R. Kizek, E.
Frei, Ellipticine cytotoxicity to cancer cell lines a
comparative study, Toxicology, vol. 4,
no. 2, pp. 98105, 2011.
90. ZH. Miao, T. Tang, Y-X. Zhang, J-S. Zhang, nd J. Ding,
Cytotoxicity, apoptosis induction
and downregulation of mdr-1 expression by the anti-topoisomerase
ii agent, salvicine, in
multidrug-resistant tumor cells, International Journal of Cancer
, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 108
115, 2003.
-
32
91. DM. Lucas, RB. Edwards, G. Lozanski, DA. West, JD. Shin, MA.
Vargo, ME. Davis, DM.
Rozewski, AJ. Johnson, B-N. Su, VM. Goetti, NA. Heerema, TS.
Lin, A. Lehman, X. Zhang,
D. Jarjoura, DJ. Newman, JC. Byrd, AD. Kinghorn and MR. Grever,
The novel plant-derived
agent silvestrol has B-cell selective activity in chronic
lymphocytic leukemia and acute
lymphoblastic leukemia in vitro and in vivo, blood, vol. 113,
no. 19, pp. 4656-4666, 2009.
92. S-C. Chang, C-T. Huang, and S-M. Huang, Experimental Study
on Effect of Compounds
in Inhibiting HCT-116 Human Colon Cancer Cells: The Preliminary
Results, Journal Society
Colon Rectal Surgeon (Taiwan), vol. 21, pp. 121-129, 2010.
93. Z. Huang, G. Chen, and P. Shi, Effects of emodin on the gene
expression profiling of
human breast carcinoma cells, Cancer Detection and Prevention
Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp.
286-29, 2009.
94. GY. Wang, JW. Zhang, QH. Lu, RZ. Xu, and QH. Dong, Berbamine
induces apoptosis in
human hepatoma cell line SMMC7721 by loss in mitochondrial
transmembrane potential and
caspase activation, Journals of Zhejiang University-Science,
vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 8(4):248-255,
2007.
95. YL. Wei, L. Xu, Y. Liang, XH. Xu, XY. Zhao, .Berbamine
exhibits potent antitumor
effects on imatinib-resistant CML cells in vitro and in vivo ,
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol.
30, no. 4, pp. 451457, 2009.
96. D. Marcin, P. Surowiak, M. Drag-Zalesinska, M. Dietel, H.
Lage and J. Oleksyszyn,
Comparision of the Cytotoxic Effects of Birch Bark Extract,
Betulin and Betulinic Acid
Towards Human Gastric Carcinoma and Pancreatic Carcinoma
Drug-sensitive and Drug-
Resistant Cell Line, Molecules, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1639-1651,
2009.
-
33
97. Alitheen, N.B., Mashitoh, A.R., Yeap, S.K., Shuhaimi, M.,
Abdul Manaf, A. and Nordin,
L. Cytotoxic effect of damnacanthal, nordamnacanthal, zerumbone
and betulinic acid isolated
from Malaysian plant sources; International Food Research
Journal, vol.17, no. 3, pp. 711-
719, 2010.
98. S. Kim, BY. Hwang, BN. Su, H. Chai, Q. Mi, AD. Kinghorn, R.
Wild, and SM. Swanson,
Silvestrol, a potential anticancer rocaglate derivative from
Aglaiafoveolata, induces apoptosis
in LNCaP cells through the mitochondrial/apoptosome pathway
without activation of
executioner caspase-3 or -7, Anticancer Research, vol. 27, no.
4B, pp. 2175-2183, 2007.
99. AD. Kinghorn, EJ. Carcache de Blanco, HB. Chai, J. Orjala,
NR. Farnsworth, DD.
Soejarto, NH. Oberlies, MC. Wani, DJ. Kroll, CJ. Pearce, SM.
Swanson, RA. Kramer, WC.
Rose, CR. Fairchild, GD. Vite, S. Emanuel, D. jarjoura and FO.
Cope, Discovery of anticancer
agents of diverse natural origin, Pure and Applied Chemistry,
vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1051-1063,
2009.
-
34
Table I: Example of anticancer phytoactives made from herbal and
their mechanisms of action
Phytoactives Mechanism of action Plant (Family) Therapeutic use
Cytotoxicity
Lines tested IC50
Paclitaxel
Docetaxel
Stop of the mitotic metaphase-
anaphase stage: inhibits the
depolymerization of microtubules.
Inhibition of proliferation
promoting cell death Taxus
brevifolia Nutt.
Taxus brevifolia Nutt.
(Taxaceae)
Taxus baccata
(Taxaceae)
Cancer of the ovary,
advanced breast and lung
[79.80]
SK-OV-3
MCF7
A-549
IC50=105 nM
IC50= 89 nM
IC50= 899,9 nM
Daphnoretin Inhibition of DNA synthesis and
protein of cancer cells
Wikstroemia indica
(Thymelaeaceae)
Human hepatoma cells
Hep3B. [81]
AGZY-83-a
Hep2
HepG2
IC50= 8.73
IC50= 9.71
IC50= 31.34
Vincristine
Vinblastine
Vinorelbine
Antimitotic:
Inhibition of tubulin polymerization
by binding to tubulin
Catharanthus roseus
(Nyssaceae)
Testicular cancer,
Hodgkin's disease and
lymphocytic leukemia
U937
HL-60
IC50= 4 nM
IC50=2.6 nM
-
35
Inhibition of microtubule assembly
Inhibition of tubulin
polymerization.
Inhibition of the formation and
function of microtubules.
Acute lung cancer and solid
tumors [82]
Colchicine antimitotic:
Inhibition of tubulin
polymerization.
Inhibition of the formation and
function of microtubules.
Colchicum autumnale
(Colchicaceae)
Gloriosa superba L.
(Colchicaceae)
Leukemia and solid tumors
[83]
HT29
A549
MCF-7
MES-SA
IC50= 2.8 nM
IC50= 2.0 nM
IC50= 3.0 nM
IC50= 2.1 nM
Flavopiridol Cell Apoptosis
Inhibition of angiogenesis
Stop the cell cycle in G1 Or G2
Amoora rohituka
(Meliaceae)
Dysoxylum
binectariferum
(Meliaceae)
Colorectal, prostate,
ovarian carcinoma and solid
tumors [84,85]
SUDHL4
PC3
HCT116
SKOV3
IC50= 120 nM
IC50= 203 nM
IC50= 0.042 M
IC50=0.265 M
-
36
Combretastatin A-4
Cell cycle arrest in G2 / M phase
Destruction of specific blood
vessels
Inhibition of formation of new
vessels or anti-angiogenesis
Combretum Caffrum
(Combretaceae)
Colon cancer and leukemia
[86]
HCT-15
L1210
IC50= 18 nM
IC50= 0.007M
Indirubin Stop the cell cycle:
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent
kinase
Angelica Gentiana
Aloe Pill
(Umbelliferae
Lung cancer, breast and
colorectal cancer [87]
LXFL529L
MCF-7
IC50= 9.9 M
IC50=4 M
Camptothecin
Topotecan, Irinotecan
Semisynthetic derivative of
Camptothecin
Cell cycle arrest and cell death:
Altered stability of topoisomerase
I-DNA complex and inhibition of
DNA replication
Camptotheca
acuminata
(Nyssaceae)
Leukemia and cancer of
colon, ovarian, colorectal
and lung [86, 88]
L1210
HT-29
IC50=23 M
IC50=0.046 M
Podophyllotoxin
Etoposid and Teniposid :
Cell cycle arrest and / or apoptosis:
Inhibition of polymerization
Podophyllum peltatum
(Berberidaceae)
Cancer of lung, prostate,
colon breast [86]
NCI H460
DU145
IC50=1.1 M
IC50=0.8 M
-
37
Semisynthetic derivatives
of Podophyllotoxin
microtubule
Inhibition of topoisomrase II
(double-stranded breaks in DNA,
activation of the kinase ATM, the
intervention of the tumor
suppressor protein
HT29
MCF7
IC50=59 M
IC50=4.3 M
Ellipticine
Inhibition of topoisomerase II
Ochrosia borbonica
(Apocynaceae)
Excavatia coccinea
(Apocynaceae)
Ochrosia elliptica
(Apocynaceae)
Breast cancer, leukemia,
neuroblastoma cells and
glioblastoma [89]
MCF-7
HL-60
IMR-32
U87MG
IC50= 1.25 M
IC50= 0.67 M
IC50= 0.27 M
IC50= 1.48 M
Salvicine
Inhibits the catalytic activity of
topoisomerase II (htopo II) which
causes DNA cleavage
Salvia prionitis Hance
(Lamiaceae)
Breast cancer, leukemia and
malignant tumors [90]
K-562
KB
MCF-7
IC50= 0.87 M
IC50= 2.26 M
IC50= 2.61 M
-
38
Silvestrol Cell apoptosis:
mitochondrial pathway involved
triggering the extrinsic pathway of
programmed cell death of tumor
cells
Aglaia foveolata
Panell
(Meliaceae)
prostate cancer, breast and
lung cancer and leukemia
[91,92,93]
JeKo-1
697 B-cell
IC50
-
39
Inhibition of the enzyme involved
in the mechanism of DNA repair,
g/mL
SK-OV-3 ovarian adenocarcinoma, MCF7: breast adenocarcinoma,
A-549: Carcinoma of the lung, AGZY-83-a:, adenocarcinoma of the
lung, HepG2:
hepatocellular carcinoma, U937: histiocytic lymphoma, HL-60,
human leukemia cells , HT29 colon Adenocarcinoma, MES-SA: Uterine
sarcoma, SUDHL4:
follicular lymphoma cells, PC3: Prostate Adenocarcinoma, HCT116:
colon carcinoma, HCT-15: colon Carcinoma, L1210: animal leukemia
cells (mouse),
LXFL529L: lung carcinoma, NCI H460: carcinoma of the lung,
DU145: prostate cancer, IMR-32: Neuroblastoma, U87MG: Glioblastoma,
K-562: CML
leukemia (human), KB: carcinoma of the skin, Jeko-1: acute
lymphoblastic leukemia, B-697 cell: acute lymphoblastic leukemia,
SMMC7721: human
hepatoma, 181RNOV: Pancreatic carcinoma, 257RDB: Gastric
carcinoma, CEM-SS: lymphocytic leukemia (human), WEHI-3B acute
promyelocytic leukemia
(human)