802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Reports

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 1

802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary ReportsDate: 2010-03-19

Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel

Corporation +44 792 008

4900 (mobile) [email protected]

Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 2

Abstract

• This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802.11 sub-groups for presentation at the March 2010 closing plenary meeting.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report Slide 3

802.11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar ‘10)Date: 2010-03-16

Name Affiliation Address Phone email Peter Ecclesine Cisco Systems [email protected]

Authors:

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

from slide 1/7 of 11-10/0321r3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report Slide 4

Volunteer Editor Contacts• TGp – Wayne Fisher – [email protected]• TGs – Kazuyuki Sakoda - [email protected]• TGu – Necati Canpolat – [email protected] • TGv – Emily Qi – [email protected]• TGz – Menzo Wentink– [email protected]• TGmb – Adrian Stephens – [email protected] (TBC)• TGaa – Hang Liu – [email protected]• Editor Emeritus:

– TGk – Joe Kwak– [email protected]– TGn – Adrian Stephens – [email protected] – TGr – Bill Marshall – [email protected]– TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – [email protected] – TGy – Peter Ecclesine – [email protected]

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

mailto:[email protected]







doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Two Technical Editors

• Peter Ecclesine runs the face to face meetings• Adrian Stephens runs the publication process• Matthew Gast is the ANA administrator

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 5from slide 3/7 of 11-10/0321r3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report Slide 6

Editor Amendment Ordering

Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date802.11 Amendment 6 TGp June 2010

802.11 Amendment 7 TGz Sept 2010

802.11 Amendment 8 TGv Sept 2010

802.11 Amendment 9 TGu Sept 2010

802.11 Amendment 10 TGs Jan 2011

802.11 Revision 802.11mb June 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 1 TGaa Oct 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 2 TGac Dec 2012

802.11-2011 Amendment 3 TGad Dec 2012

802.11-2011 Amendment 4 TGae Jun 2012

802.11-2011 Amendment 5 TGaf Dec 2012

• Data as of Mar 2010• See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm

Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

802.11 Style Guide

• See 11-09-1034-00-0000-wg11-style-guide.doc• These style practices are to be followed when

submitting drafts for Working Group consideration

Slide 7 Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Pre-RevCom IEEE-SA Review

• Possibly near the end of Sponsor Ballot (3rd recirc or 4th recirc) , we would offer the draft to the publications editor for review. This allows ambiguities and errors to be addressed in Sponsor Ballot by comments, rather than discover the ambiguities and errors after RevCom.

• A downside is the possibility that many pages are touched by the changes (like renaming), and voters reopen text that has been stable for new comments.

• It appears that during MEC is the least risky time for a publication editor’s review.

• Another choice is after initial Sponsor Ballot. We will ask if it is valid to make editorial changes between EC approval and initial sponsor ballot.

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 8from slide 7/7 of 11-10/0321r3 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 9

Closing ReportDate: 2010-03-19

Name Company Address Phone email

Clint Chaplin Samsung Electronics 75 W. Plumeria Drive San Jose, Ca 95134

+1 408 544 5815 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/3 of 11-10/0418r0 by Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 10

Abstract

Closing report for WNG SC for March 2010, Orlando, Florida, USA


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 11

• Five presentations at this meeting– Heterogeneous Wireless LAN Mesh Interworking (11-10-0296-01-0wng-

heterogeneous-wireless-mesh-network-interworking.pptx) - Taejin Lee– Towards Carrier-Grade 802.11 at Disney Theme Parks (11-10-0287-03-0wng-

towards-carrier-grade-802-11-at-disney-theme-parks.pptx) – Stefan Mangold– Comments on Sub 1 GHz license-exempt operation (11-10-0204-01-0wng-

commentsonsub1ghz.ppt) – Dave Halasz– Fast Initial Authentication (11-10-0361-00-0000-fast-initial-

authentication.ppt) - Hiroki Nakano– Heterogeneous Wireless Networks Management (11-10-0368-00-0wng-

heterogeneous-wireless-networks-management.ppt) - 802.21 Network Management Study Group

• Minutes– 11-10-364r0

• Plans for May 2010– 2 2 hour sessions


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 12

IEEE 802.11 ARC SC – March 2010

• Topics for March 802 Plenary– 802.1 architecture document revision effort

• Impacts to .11• Interface approach• Interested .11 Members

• .11 ARC Chair attended 802 OA session as .1 liaison

• .11 ARC did not meet this week – Chair was off-line with food poisoning

• Stay away from the hotel café meatloaf special….

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

802 OA project status

• Revision of 802 OA is a currently authorized project– Par approved 27/feb/2007– Expires end of 2011

• PAR was created for revision (instead of reaffirmation).• 802 Chair recently reorganized project

– New project chair, 1 designated member from each “dot” group.• Status:

– There is a d0 draft, it had a internal TG review in .1; – Review closed 2/2009, comments not processed.

• 802 OA base doc is vintage 2001 for content – 2001 was rev of original 1990 doc– There are 2 amendments to 2001 doc

• A (2003) for ethertypes & B (2004) Registration of object ids.

Mar 2010


ns, Intel

Corporation

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

802 OA March 2010 Discussion Notes

• Goals for project:– Update to reflect current usage– Insure it is relevant to all 802 groups.

• Missing topics: – wireless, – .17, – should probably take out token ring and maybe FDDI.

• Issue: we have stds that don’t have macs & phys (ex: 21 & 23)– how to fit them into this Framework? How does .19 fit?

• AI for .11 (and other groups) review 802 OA, see how “dot” standard fits (or doesn’t) with layer pics in 802 OA, start discussion / proposal for 802 OA changes.

Mar 2010


ns, Intel

Corporation

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 15

March 2010 TGmb Closing ReportDate: 2010-03-18

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Matthew Gast Trapeze Networks 5753 W. Las Positas Blvd,

Pleasanton, CA 94588 USA +1 (925) 474-2273 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0346r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 16

Abstract

Closing report for TGmb for March 2010 interim meeting in Orlando, Florida, USA.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 17

TGmb StatusAll aboard, full steam ahead on the recirculation!

Photo credit: Tasa_M on Flickr; used with permission (Creative Commons license)http://www.flickr.com/photos/tasa_m/3274018735/


Mar 2010

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tasa_m/3274018735/

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 18

Accomplishments

• No interpretation requests received• Completed comment processing from LB160;

recirculation ballot will be requested later– One teleconference to resolve comments: May 7

• Major technical presentations– Clause 11.3 comment resolution– Extensive debate on key caching clarifications– Regulatory framework

• No change to plan of record


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 19

Current TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests

Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot

– (includes All published Amendments as of May 2009) Nov 2009 – Recirc start• May 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days)• July 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start

– (Include all published amendments as of July 2010)• November 2010 – Sponsor Recirc• March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval• June 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 20

References

• Agenda: 11-10/0290r5• Minutes: 11-10/0348r0


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 21

TGp Closing ReportDate: 2010-03-17

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Lee Armstrong Employer:

Armstrong Consulting, Inc.

Affiliation: USDoT

132 Fomer Road Southampton, MA 01073 USA

+1 617 620 1701

[email protected]

Author:

from slide 1/4 of 11-10/0386r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc ./US DoT

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 22

Abstract

TGp (acting as P802.11p CRC) closing report for March meetings

from slide 2/4 of 11-10/0386r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc ./US DoT)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 23

March Meetings Summary

• Sponsor Ballot #1 closed on 16 February, 96 % affirmative• 3 time slots during the week• Completed resolution of all comments (21) prior to and during the

week, resolution document is 11-10-0239-02-000p sb1 tgp comment resolutions master

• All SB#1 commenters have indicated that they are satisfied with these resolutions

• Voted to go to recirculation ballot as soon as possible• Voted to request EC for conditional approval to forward to June

RevCom meeting


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 24

Status

• D11.0 will be going to recirculation ballot • All disapprove voters have been satisfied with one

exception that did not vote on last ballot• Weekly teleconferences planned for every Thursday @

1500 Piscataway time (resuming after recirculation ballot is complete)

• Plan is to complete sponsor balloting and present to June RevCom meeting


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 25

TGs Orlando Closing ReportDate: 2010-03-19

Author:Name Address Affiliation Phone Email

Dee Denteneer HTC 37; 5656 AE Eindhoven; The Netherlands

Philips +31 40 2749743

[email protected]

from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0421r0 by Dee Denteneer

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 26

Abstract

TGs closing report for the March 2010meeting.Resolved outstanding comments and ready to go to

recirculation.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 27

Status• TGs passed LB 159 with 85% approval rate (January

2010)• Before the meeting:

• Comment resolution spreadsheet 11-10/0032r5 with 349 comments open

• Most recent TGs Draft is D4.01• After meeting

• Most recent TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11-10/0032r11, with resolutions to all comments

• An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting in 11-10/0241r6

• The TGs draft minutes will be uploaded as 11-10/0381r1


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 28

Next Steps• Produce Draft 5.0 and go to recirculation• TGs is holding teleconferences on Thursdays April 1

and May 6, 13 and Wednesday April 28 at 11:00 ET for a maximum duration of 90 minutes

• TGs has planned an ad hoc meeting in Tokyo May 13-15 just before the May meeting in Beijing.

• Goal for the May 2010 TGs meeting in Beijing, China:– Start resolving comments received in recirculation,

aiming for a rapid recirculation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 29

• Motion:– Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments

received from LB#159 on P802.11s Draft 4.0 as contained in document 11-10/32r12,

– Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 5.0 incorporating these resolutions and,

– Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”

• Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs• TGs vote:

– Moved: Dave Halasz: Seconded: Michael Bahr Result: 10-0-0


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 30

• Motion, moved to schedule TGs teleconferences on Thursdays April 1 and May 6, 13 and Wednesday April 28 at 11:00 ET for a maximum duration of 90 minutes.

Mover: Kazuyuki Sakoda Seconder: Guido HiertzApproved by unanimous consent

• Motion, moved to hold a TGs ad hoc on May 13-15 in Tokyo.

Mover: Guido Hiertz Seconder: Kazuyuki SakodaApproved by unanimous consent


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 31



Stephen McCann Research in Motion (RIM) UK Ltd

200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK

+44 1753 667099 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/3 of 11-10/0408r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 32

Abstract

Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for March 2010,

Orlando, Florida, USA


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 33

• Initial Sponsor Ballot (#0) progress– Resolved all comments this week.

• 11-09-1120-20-000u-d8-0-comments-spreadsheet.xls– 1st re-circulation sponsor ballot late March 2010

• Teleconferences– Wednesdays at 11 ET– 31st March, 6th April, 28th April, 5th May, 12th May

• Plans for May 2010– Resolve 1st re-circ sponsor ballot comments


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 34

March 2010 Closing ReportDate: 2010-03-18

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave

Sunnyvale, CA 94089

+1 630-363-1389

[email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/8 of 11-10/0416r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 35

Abstract

This document contains the TGv closing report for March 2010.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 36

Goals and Accomplishments

• Comment resolution from Initial Sponsor Ballot– 1045 comments, 1045 resolutions completed, 0 remain

• Teleconferences• Thursdays April 8, 15, 29, May 6, 13, Tuesday April 20• 2pm Eastern (11am Pacific)• 2 hours


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 37

Output Documents

• 11-10-0416-00-000v-TGv-March-2010-closing-report.ppt• 11-10-0267-06-000v-tgv-March-2010-agenda.ppt • 11-10-0417-00-000v-TGv-Meeting-Minutes-March-

2010.doc


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 38

TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2009 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed

– Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0, Nov 08 – D4.0• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)

– Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09• Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09

– Oct 09 – D7.0 • Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09

– Jan 09 – D8.0, March D9.0, April D10.0 (deleted Feb D9.0)– May 12th ( or so) for Revcom June Approval

• Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 • RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 4th/June 5th(or so)• Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 39

TGv Timeline – Updated March, 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed

– Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0, Nov 08 – D4.0• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)

– Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09 • Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09

– Oct 09 – D7.0 Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09– Jan 09 – D8.0, D9.0, March D10.0, April/May D11.0, May/June D11.0

(unchanged)– 20 August Revcom for Sept approval (was May/ June)

• Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 • RevCom/Standards Board Approval: September 2010 (was June

2010)• Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 40

Goals for Mar 10 - May 2010

• Second Recirculation Sponsor Ballot• Resolve comments from Second Recirculation Sponsor

Ballot• Third Recirculation Sponsor Ballot


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 41

References


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 42

TGz Orlando Closing ReportDate: 18 March 2010

Name Company Address Phone email Menzo Wentink Qualcomm Straatweg 66,

Breukelen, the Netherlands

+31-65-183-6231

[email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/2 of 11-10/0400r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 43

TGz Accomplishments in Orlando

• TGz resolved all of the comments received on the first recirculation sponsor ballot– The approved comment resolutions are in 11-10/298r2

• TGz approved a 15-day recirculation sponsor ballot to start when the editor has prepared TGz draft 8.0

• TGz approved the following teleconferences:– April 8, 15, 22, 29, May 6, 13– Start time 2pm ET, for 2 hours

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

802.11aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Orlando, Florida Closing Report – Draft Version

Date: 2010-03-18

Authors:Name Affiliation Address Phone email Ganesh Venkatesan Intel Corporation JF3-336 2111NE 25th Ave +1 503 334 6720 Ganesh.Venkatesan@intel

.com Alex Ashley NDS Ltd One London Road, Staines,

Middlesex, TW18 4EX, England

+44 1784 848770 [email protected]

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 44from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0395r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel; Alex Ashley, NDS

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Goals for the Orlando Meeting:• Review alternate proposals on interworking with

802.1Qat proposal and adopt the best fit• Discuss and resolve review comments on Draft

0.04• Listen to technical proposals on TGaa topics• Joint meeting with 802.1AVB – review 802.1Qat

and settle on a proposal for“interworking with 802,1Qat”

• Empower the editor to generate D0.99 for internal review WG letter ballot at the end of May meeting

Snapshot

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 45

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Technical PresentationsMar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 46

Document number Title Author(s)

1 10/219r3 Solution Choices for Interworking with 802.1Qat Ganesh Venkatesan

2 09/1183r1 Resolution to Draft 0.02 Internal Review Comment #3 Brian Hart

3 10/319r1,320r0 Improving MRG with DMS Brian Hart

4 10/304r0 Empirical Formulas for EDCA overhead factor Graham Smith

5 10/398r0 Designated MSRP Node handling on 802.11 Network Philippe Klein

6 10/326r0 OBSS Race Condition Solution Alex Ashley

7 10/411r0,412r0 Enhancement to DEI for Intra-stream prioritization Yacine Ghamri Doudane

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

• Discussed, resolved and approved corresponding contributions related to comments on Draft 0.02, D0.03

• Listened to technical proposals on TGaa topics• Jointly met with 802.1AVB

• Reviewed alternate solutions on interworking with 802.1Qat proposal.

• Selected an approach for 802.11 interworking with 802.1Qat MSR protocol

• Empowered the editor to generate D0.05 incorporating approved internal review comment resolutions/new contributions.

What did we accomplish this week?

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 47

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

• Teleconferences (Mar 29, Apr 12, Apr 26, May 10 – 1100-1230 Hrs EDT)• Complete internal review of Draft 0.04,

resolve corresponding comments• Listen to technical proposals on TGaa topics• Complete Draft 0.05 review and generate

comment spreadsheet• May 2010 Meeting

• Complete Draft 0.05 comment resolution• Approve Draft1.0 and kickoff WG letter Ballot

Plans

Mar 2010

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 48

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 49

TGac March 2010 Closing ReportDate: 2010-03-18

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Osama Aboul-Magd Samsung Electronics 613-599-5078 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0413r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 50

Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGac for the March 2010 session.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 51

Work Completed• Continued with the Ad Hoc group meetings. Ad Hoc group reports are

available at:– MAC Ad Hoc report 11-10-0199r2– PHY Ad Hoc report 11-10-0211r7– MU-MIMO Ad Hoc report 11-10-0328r2– Coexistence Ad Hoc report 11-10-0340r5

• Motions passed to update the TG Specification Framework in areas related to:– Preamble structure with two VHT SIG fields and TBD auto detect form (R3.2.1.F

and R3.2.1.G)– PHY Numerology excluding the maximum number of users for MU (R3.2.2.A)– Interference cancellation and Resolvable LTFs (R4.1)– Same modulation the same coding rate and coding type for all streams in SU

transmission (R3.4.D)– VHT SIG A to include STBC and BW bit(s) (R3.2.1.H)

• Accepted a new revision of the TGac Channel Models Addendum document

• Accepted a new revision of the TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

TG Approved Documents

• 11-09-059r5 is the approved TGac Selection Procedure document.

• 11-09-0161r2 is the approved TGac Usage Model document .

• 11-09-308r12 is the approved TGac Channel Models Addendum document.

• 11-09-0451r12is the approved TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document

• 09-0992r9 is the approved TGac Specification Framework document.

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 52from slide 4/6 of 11-10/0413r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 53

May 2010 Goals• Continue the work on the Specification Framework

document and its related functional blocks.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 54

Conference Call Times

• PHY telecon schedule– April 8, 11:00 – 12:00 EDT

• MAC telecon schedule– April 8, 10:00 – 11:00 EDT

• Coexistence telecon schedule– April 22, 20:00 – 21:00 EDT

• MU-MIMO telecon schedule– Thu April 15, 10:00-11:00 EDT– Thu April 29, 20:00-21:00 EDT


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 55

TGad March 2010 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-19

Name Company Address Phone email Eldad Perahia Intel

Corporation 2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124

503-712-8081 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0272r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 56

Abstract

This document is the closing report for TGad for the March 2010 session.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 57

Work Completed (1/2)

• New Technique Proposals• 802.11ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259r2, Yuichi Morioka, Sony• Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255r2,

John Stine, Self• Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264r3, André Bourdoux,

IMEC• Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245r1, Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital• Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems,

10/0231r3, John Barr, NICT• Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence,

10/0249r2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research• Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250r1, Ananth Subramanian,

Insititute for Infocomm Research• Strawpolls conducted on most of the New Technique proposals to

gauge support (9 strawpolls in 22 minutes)


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 58

Work Completed (2/2)• Channel model document development

– Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz, 10/0372r0, Hirokazu Sawada

– TGad Channel Model Update, 10/0391r0, Alexander Maltsev– Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, 09/0334r7,

Alexander Maltsev• Enterprise cubicle channel model discussed bu not

complete– Complete proposals in May will only simulate home living room

and office conference room scenarios


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 59

Goals for May 2010

• Complete proposal presentations followed by New Technique proposal presentations– Motion passed (Y: 48, N: 1, A: 12) stating that TGad in the

May 2010 session to have presentation of all three complete proposals first, followed by NT proposals presentations

• Strawpolls on Complete proposals and New Technique proposals

• Complete Channel Model document


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 60

Conference call times

• Not overlap with TGac• April 29

– 10:00-12:00 EDT– Channel modeling


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 61

TGae Closing Report – March 2010Date: 2010-03-18

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Michael Montemurro Research in Motion 4701 Tahoe Blvd.

Mississauga, ON. Canada. L4W 0B4

+1-905-629-4746 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0407r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 62

Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGae Task Group for the March 2010 session.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 63

Work Completed• Output:

– Requirements and Use cases:• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0093-05-00ae-tgae-requirements-a

nd-use-cases.doc• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0028-08-000m-lb-160-security-an

d-mac-management.xls– TGae Proposal Framework:

• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0365-03-00ae-proposal-for-prioritization-of-management-frames.doc

• Teleconferences:– Thursday 11am ET for 1 hour on April 8, April 22, and May 6


Mar 2010

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0093-05-00ae-tgae-requirements-and-use-cases.doc

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0093-05-00ae-tgae-requirements-and-use-cases.doc

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0028-08-000m-lb-160-security-and-mac-management.xls

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0028-08-000m-lb-160-security-and-mac-management.xls

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0365-03-00ae-proposal-for-prioritization-of-management-frames.doc

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0365-03-00ae-proposal-for-prioritization-of-management-frames.doc

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 64

TGae Timeline – March 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: November ‘10• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: March

‘11• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: May ‘11• Initial Sponsor Ballot: July ‘11• Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov ‘11• Final WG/EC Approval: Mar ‘12• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June ‘12


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 65

May 2010 Goals• Find an Editor and Secretary for TGae• Discuss technical presentations and proposals to form the initial

draft.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 66

IEEE 802.11 TGafOrlando Closing Report

Date: 2010-03-19

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In

Motion 7305 Napier Trail Austin, TX 78729


Peter Ecclesine Cisco Systems 170 W. Tasman Dr., San Jose, CA 95134


Authors:

from slide 1/7 of 11-10/0405r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 67

AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the first

meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of March 15, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Orlando, Florida.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Agenda• Review and approve the minutes from the Los Angeles meeting

and the teleconferences• Review the PAR Scope and Purpose, TG approved Principles,

Purpose and Vision/Outcome• Select and approve the Technical Editor• Summary and categorization of the proposals• Review and approve 11-10/0238r2 as the base text for draft 0.01• Review all other proposals and request normative/informative text

as the TG deems appropriate• Plan for May and teleconferences

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 68from slide 3/7 of 11-10/0405r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

TGaf Accomplishments • Approved Peter Ecclesine as the Technical Editor• Adopted 11-10/238r2 as draft 0.01• Heard 9 other proposals

– Straw polls to ask if TG wants to advance each proposal

• Requested 4 presenters develop text for the draft– Others were encouraged to continue

• Planned for May and teleconferences– March 30, April 13, 27, May 11

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 70

TGaf Timeline – Updated March 2010 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: May 2010• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot:

September 2010• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: October 2010• Initial Sponsor Ballot: December 2010• Approved Sponsor Ballot: January 2011• Final WG/EC Approval: March 2011• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 2011


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

References• 11-09-0934-09-tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c• 11-10-0021-06-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-los-angeles-2010• 11-10-0183-01-00af-los-angeles-meeting-minutes• 11-10-0226-00-00af-feb-16-telecon-minutes• 11-10-0297-00-00af-march-9-teleconference-minutes• 11-10-0299-02-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-orlando-2010• 11-10-0248-01-00af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report• 11-10-0253-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-

adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-2-hidden-node• 11-10-0256-01-00af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-

adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-1-synchronized-quiet• 11-10-0257-01-00af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications


ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

References [2]

• 11-10-0258-01-00af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for-802-11af• 11-10-0260-01-00af-radio-resource-measurement-type-and-

procedure-for-tvws-application-under-fcc-rules• 11-10-0261-01-00af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-

tvws-under-fcc-rules• 11-10-0262-00-00af-requirements-and-amendments-regarding-

tvws-database-access• 11-10-0263-00-00af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spaces-

operation

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 73

JTC1 ad hoc closing report (Mar 10)Date: 2010-03-19


Andrew Myles Cisco [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/3 of 11-10/0402r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 74

Abstract

Closing report for JTC1 ad hocfor March 2010, Orlando, USA


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 75

JTC1 ad hoc reviewed items related to SB drafts, PSDO, WAPI & tutorial

• Progress in Orlando (March 2010)– Reviewed status of SB drafts sent to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6

• 11u/v/p/z were sent to SC6– Review status of PSDO related liaison sent to SC6 in Nov 09

• We are likely to use PSDO process for 11mb rollup– Update on SC6 ballot to start a New Project related to WAPI

• The WAPI NP proposal was approved – Update on plans for a tutorial in Beijing in May 2010 on the

Chinese standards development process • It is going ahead, and teleconferences may be needed to assist

planning• Plans for Beijing (May 2010)

– Consider any JTC1 liaison issues• Identify IEEE rep for JTC1/SC6 meeting in London in Sept


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 76

IEEE 802.11Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee


Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In

Motion 7305 Napier Trail Austin, TX 78729


Authors:


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 77

AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Orlando

meeting of the IEEE 802.11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Agenda

• Regulatory summaries– North America– European Union– Asia

• FOCUS: – EN 300 328 v1.8.1 revision– The National Broadband Plan– Ofcom consultation on 600 MHz band


ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Accomplishments

• Provided updates on relevant regulatory actions• Discussed the status of the revision of EN 300 328• Discussed the progress of changes to the 5 GHz

certification rules• Discussed the Ofcom consultation on “Digital dividend:

600 MHz band and geographic interleaved spectrum; Consultation on potential uses – Will use Regulatory Ad Hoc and 802.18 teleconferences to

respond• Began the review of The National Broadband Plan

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Documents• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0279-00-0reg-march-4th-teleconference

-minutes.doc• http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09821.html• http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09822.html• http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/clearedaward/condoc.pdf• http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/ddrinterleaved/interleaved.pdf• http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/bandmngr/condoc.pdf• http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/600mhz_geographic/600condoc.pdf• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296859A1.pdf• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296858A1.pdf• http://www.broadband.gov/download-plan• http://docbox.etsi.org/ERM/ERMTG11/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2010/ERMTG11(10

)0009r3_Working_draft_EN_300_328_v_1.8.1_Outcome_mtg24.zip

• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/10/18-10-0023-01-0000-ofcom-600mhz-consultation-questions.ppt

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0279-00-0reg-march-4th-teleconference-minutes.doc

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0279-00-0reg-march-4th-teleconference-minutes.doc

http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09821.html

http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf09822.html

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/clearedaward/condoc.pdf

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/ddrinterleaved/interleaved.pdf

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/bandmngr/condoc.pdf

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/600mhz_geographic/600condoc.pdf

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296859A1.pdf

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296858A1.pdf

http://www.broadband.gov/download-plan

http://docbox.etsi.org/ERM/ERMTG11/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2010/ERMTG11(10)0009r3_Working_draft_EN_300_328_v_1.8.1_Outcome_mtg24.zip

http://docbox.etsi.org/ERM/ERMTG11/05-CONTRIBUTIONS/2010/ERMTG11(10)0009r3_Working_draft_EN_300_328_v_1.8.1_Outcome_mtg24.zip

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/10/18-10-0023-01-0000-ofcom-600mhz-consultation-questions.ppt

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.18/dcn/10/18-10-0023-01-0000-ofcom-600mhz-consultation-questions.ppt

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1

Report

Thanks to all who participated!

See you in Beijing

Adrian Stephe

ns, Intel

Corporation


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 82

+1 (321)427-4098

5488 Marvell Lane,Santa Clara, CA, 95054

Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell

[email protected]

Smart Grid ad hoc Closing Report - March 2010

Date: 2010-3-18Authors:

Abstract: Information on Smart Grid activities – March 2010

Related documentsSmart Grid ad hoc Meeting Report 11-10-0373r2 Smart Grid ad hoc meeting minutes 11-10-0419r0

from slide 1/10 of 11-10/0420r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 83

Agenda TopicsPlanned topics:1. National Broadband plan – Smart Grid chapter

2. Update on SGIP meeting of March 16-17– Mark Klerer3. Results and action items for NIST PAP#2 modeling• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wirel

ess/PAP2modeling.ppt4. Modified flow diagram representation of Use cases - Mark KlererSubsequent conference calls and plans for May meeting

http://download.broadband.gov/plan/national-broadband-plan.pdf


Mar 2010

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/PAP2modeling.ppt

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/PAP2modeling.ppt

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 84

Upcoming Events

• March 21 meeting at NIST to review PAP#2 progress

• May 24-27: 2nd SGIP Face-to-Face in Santa Clara, CA. • Held in conjunction with P2030 & ConnectivityWeek.


Mar 2010

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP

http://www.connectivityweek.com/2010/

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 85

Tough Questions• What are the consequences of not responding to the request?• How much effort, from whom, how quickly needs to be

contributed to meet the request?• Could the June deadline for task completion be extended?

• How will the data provided to NIST be used by other entities in influencing deployment decisions?

• “Entities” range from FERC to consumer appliances

• Can simulation models be useful enough without selecting and constructing channel models?


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 86

Working Assumptions• The ongoing interchange of information between power

engineering and communications industry is essential.• Computer modeling communications against PE supplied

uses cases is far more useful than hand waving.• Although not fully understood or quantified, there will be

business incentives to being recognized as a qualified Smart Grid technology.

• Although not fully understood, industry would prefer to be “actively influencing” the technology selection process rather than have it dictated to them.


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 87

Status Checklist

1. Is there a public simulator available to run?• 802.16 –Yes, NS2• 802.11 – Yes, NIST Matlab

2. Has the simulator been recently executed to demonstrate it can produce useful results?– Yes, NIST Matlab for 802.11. 3 attendees.

3. Have any of the OpenSG uses cases been modeled by industry?– No


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 88

Status Checklist4. Has anyone volunteered to run the model on the use cases

and report results?4. In time for the March 31 NIST status meeting?5. In time for May 802 Interim meeting?6. In time for June NIST deadline?

5. Has any 802 participant validated the model results against other simulators or lab test?– No

6. Are there any known corrections or extensions to the models needed to model uses cases?– 802.11 model is missing mesh– 802.11 model has been run using only 1 Mbps, BPSK in 2.4 GHz– Automatic rate scaling


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 89

Status Checklist7. Is there a better way to promote uptake of model execution?

– through advertising/cooperation with universities?– through outreach/cooperation with support organizations such as Zigbee,

Wi-Fi, WiMAX

– Develop one page description/advertising of PAP#2 modeling task– Dorothy & Mark will help Bruce do this

8. Are there any known clarifications to the uses cases required to provide useful results?


Mar 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0282r1


ns, Intel

Corporation

Slide 90

Future Smart Grid calls• Schedule plan so far has been Wednesdays at 2pm EST• Future call plans will be to continue this pattern – 1 per week

– to July• Next call March 24

• Call topic suggestions• Review of one page task promotion• Detailed walk thru of first three use cases to determine if we

need further clarification from Open SG (on March 31)• Reports on model results (from anyone)• Or note any additional commitments to run models


Mar 2010