PNS(Medica1) 17~~ January 2012 ANEEXURE - B Report of Expert Committee in respect of eliclibility and approval of admission done in Academic Year 2011-12 Course- B.Sc. Nursing Decision of the Samiti On the basis of report of University, Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 19 candidates. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 36 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 25 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. Name of the student having Discrepancies 0 01- Snehal 'angaram 01- Ahire Arti Kailash 02- Wadagale Rozy Shashikant No. of Students have no Discrepancies hence recommended for approval 19 36 25 = 8 .- u a 19 37 27 8: B E e u 30 50 50 Srm No. 1 2 3 Name of College MGM, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Mumbai Terna College of Basic BSC. Nursing, Mumbai Maharshi Karve, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Pune
30
Embed
8: .- BEsspnsamiti.gov.in/PDF/Minutes/PNS_Med_17Jan-Annexure-B.pdf · 2012. 2. 8. · C:\Jay\Nursing.doc Tehmi Grant, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing,Pune MIMER,College of Basic B.Sc.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012 ANEEXURE - B
Report of Expert Committee in respect of eliclibility and approval of admission done in Academic Year 2011-12
Course- B.Sc. Nursing
Decision of the Samiti
On the basis of report of University, Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 19 candidates. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 36 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 25 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
Name of the student having Discrepancies
0
01- Snehal 'angaram
01- Ahire Arti Kailash
02- Wadagale Rozy Shashikant
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies hence
recommended for approval
19
36
25
= 8 .- u a
19
37
27
8: B E e u
30
50
50
Srm No.
1
2
3
Name of College
MGM, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Mumbai
Terna College of Basic BSC. Nursing, Mumbai
Maharshi Karve, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Pune
-<,- Ld'
2 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
Decision of the Samiti
7
Srm No.
I No. of Students /
Nameofcollege
4
5
6
7
Q) Y
3 r W
C:\Jay\Nursing.doc
Tehmi Grant, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing,Pune
MIMER,College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Latur
Wanless Hosp.,College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Miraj
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 36 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 23 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 33 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 28 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 39
28
39
0
01- Chavan Tejaswini Shambhu
%., . 3 PNS(Medica1)
1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
Decision of the Samiti
candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Name of the student having Discrepancies
02- Dhole Avanti Dilip 03- Hire Sanket Ravindra
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies hence
recommended for approval
Srg No.
C:\Jay\Nursing.doc
8 B E = H
Name of College
Nursing,Nashik
9
lo
11
42
38
24
u 8 .- m a
50
50
50
-
V.S.P.M, College of College of Basic Nursing,Nagpur
Jagdale Mamacollege of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Barshi, Solapur
Sadhu Vaswani, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing,Pune
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 42 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 08 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 38 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 24 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Sr. No. Name of College
Jaslok , College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing,Mumbai
P.D.Hinduja College of Basic B.Sc Nursing Mumbai
Bombay Hospital, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing ,Mumbai
Bel -Air, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Satara.
Foundation,College of Nursing,Ratnagiri.
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies hence
recommended for approval
Name of the student having Discrepancies
01- Soniya Salim Thakker
01- Gavli Viju Dharamraj
01- Dhulap Arti Bhkasen 02- Gavde Ankita A j u n 03- Gavde Latika Candrakant 04- Nimbare Priyanka Vasudeo
PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
Decision of the Samiti
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 24 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 30 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 44 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 40 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 19 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 06 candidates
PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies
recommended
Name of the student having Discrepancies
Decision of the Samiti
El- Awhad Priyanka Sumant )
for approval 05- Sukade Siddhi Prakash
06- Pawri Dhanashri Vishnu
1 02- Hire Ashish kishor I
where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 26 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
-
03- Gadkari Sachin Sanjay 04-Giri Jyoti Sitaram
Swatantra Senani I 05- Jadhav Sonali Babusina I
I l7 1 Uttamrao Patil College of Basic B.Sc. 1 50 1 36 Samiti further decides to approve the
admissions of remaining 10 candidates ( 08-patole Salami Salomarj ( where the University found discrepancies,
I 10- Kulare Meghraj I
09- Gaikwad Sheela Ramesh
subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 15 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
18 admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 20 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
St. Andrews,College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Pune.
20 I 01- Paaare Ashwini I
40
19 02- Mahire Shita Sanjay 03- Wan khede Priyanka
( Bhujangrao
Gokhale Education Society's College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing,
Samiti further decides to approve the
3 0
1 04- Zanan Rahul Raiendra I
~ .--,''
6 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies Name of the student I hence I having Discrepancies I Decision of the Samiti
04- Kale Yogesh Babasaheb Mother Teresa,College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Aurangabad
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 19 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 08 candidates where the University found discrepancies,
05- Mundhe Dnyashwar
subject to submissioi of required documents to the University.
David
01- Baviskar Akash ~ i l i ~
02- More Archana Jaywant JMF, ACPM,College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Dhule
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 27 candidates where the University found no
1 03- Sonar Akash D i l ~ Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 04 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
discrepancy. I
04- Vispute Kuber Vilas
College of Basic B.Sc. 30 01- Udakhe Yogita Arunrao
02- Dhongde Ragini Ramchandra
to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 30 candidates where the University found no
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies hence
recommended for approval
Name of the student having Discrepancies
03- Dhurve Anita Mangilal 04- Gaurkhede Punam
( Jagan 1 05- Jamni k Vivek Dilip I 1 06- Lande Roshni I Subhashrao 07- Nandgaokar Rahul Devidas 08- Raibole Ka~ i l Komal
discrepancy. I Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 13 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
decides to approve the admissions of 35 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the Universi .
%
---1 * ,
8 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
Decision of the Samiti
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 15 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 21 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 08 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti - decides to approve the admissions of 24
candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 06 candidates
where the University found discrepancies, subjed to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 49 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 50 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 35 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 05 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
k*
10 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies I Name of the student hence having Discrepancies Decision of the Samiti
01- Kadam Ashwini Bhaskar
recommended for approval
I 01- Anevar Menka Nilkhant
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 22 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the
1 University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 13 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
1s Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
12
- ~~
1 03- Karalkar Seema Viiav I Nancy Christa admitted in NRI Quota I
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 11 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
KDA College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, 50 7 Mumbai
Hiranandani College of Basic Nursing, 45 20 Mumbai -
Beleshwar College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, 40 25 Parbhani
1 7 ~ ~ January 2012 No. of Students
have no
recommended for approval
Discrepancies I hence
11- Lokhande Swapnil Sudhir Rwamo Nancy Christa One Candidate selected in NRI Quota ,PNS may verify NRI
Name of the student having Discrepancies I Decision of the Samiti
to the University.
01- Olvea Diction
status of this candidate
decides to approve the admissions of 06 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
On the basis of report of University Samiti
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the
( University. 1 On the basis of report of Universitv Samiti
On the basis of report of University Samiti I 02- 'adha' Datta Dnyanoba 1 decides to approve the admissions of 18
20
18 Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the Universitv found discrepancies,
0
01- Bharde D i ~ a l i DiliD
03- Kandere Dinesh Dipak 04- Shinde Arti Ashokrao
subject to submissioi of required documents to the University.
Uttamraom
decides to approve the admissions of 20 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Sir. H.N.Hospital, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Mumbai
%.-/
5-
12 PNS(Medica1)
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 07 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Dr.Balabhai Nanavati Hospita, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Mumbai
No.
36
37
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 30 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
u
.- B E
u 4
f 5
25
Smt. Smitrabai Thakre, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Yavatmal
Name of College
Br. Nath Pai,College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Kudal, Sindhudurga
Vijayasinh Mohite Patil, College of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Solapur
I 01- Meshram Priyanka I On the basis of report of University ~am i t i
a Y
c H
40
40
No. of Students have no
Discrepancies hence
recommended for approvai
15
2 f
decides to approve the admissions of 17 candidates where the University found no
Milind discrepancy. 17 03- Moon Manish Samiti further decides to approve the
admissions of remaining 05 candidates where the University found discrepancies,
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 15 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 21 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 04 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
05- Wankhede Shital Prakashrao
subject to submission of required documents to the University.
"% ,*/
13 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
No. of Students have no
41
Discrepancies Name of the student I having Discrepancies 1 Decision of the Sarniti
hence
K.J.Somaiya college of Basic B.Sc. Nursing, Mumbai 02- Rathod Vishnu Haribhau
40 Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
01- Jadhav Nutan Balu
9
On the basis of report of University Samiti
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 07 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
- decides to approve the admissions of 28
03- Dhokne Vl'asrao 1 candidates where the University found no 04- Kirnahake Krnlesh discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 08 -candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
08- Yogesh Suthar On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 08 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
01- 'Oniya Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
1 7 ~ januiry 2012
1 No. of Students 1
Srm 1 Name of College No. 1 1 " 1 3 I recommended I
8 3 e
for approval
= 8 *g -
1- Shubhangi Mukundrao Meshram
Decision of the Samiti have no
Discrepancies hence
17 Asharam College of Nursing, Nagpur
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 16 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Name of the student having Discrepancies
40 Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
_l i /
15 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
Report of Expert Committee in respect of eliaibilitv and approval of admission done in Academic Year 2011-12
Course- B.P.Th. (Phvsiotherapvl
Sr. No.
I K.J.Somaiya College I
Terna, College of Physiotherapy, Mumbai
No. of Students have
30
MGM's College of Physiotherapy, Mumbai
30
, Decision of the Samiti no
Discrepancies hence
recommended I I 1
Name of the student having Discrepancies
decides to approve the admissions of 25 candidates where the University found no
for approval
-- 1 3- Mehata Nishika Rahul I 1
1- Electricwala Fatema On the basis of report of University Samiti
23
23
4- Shah Riya Kirti
07- Thakkar Meena Ramesh
01- Goswami Sushmita
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 05 candidates
5- Shah Mbhuti Kiranbhai
01- Dubal Priyanka Jitendra
02- Gandhi Prakash - 03- Kapadia Jamila Abbas 04- Pereira Clinton Anthoni 05- Sakpal Ashish Pra bhakar 06- Savant Manah Ramesh
to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 28 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
28
where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 23 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
02- Savle Sonam Ramdas
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
Sr. No. Name of College
CMF's, College of Physiotherapy, Pune
Sancheti,College of Physiotherapy, Pune
M.A.Rangoonwala, College of Physiotherapy, Pune
k,i ,' 16 PNS(Medica1)
1 7 ~ ~ January 2012 No. of
Students have
Decision of the Samiti no
Discrepancies hence
recommended I 1
Name of the student having Discrepancies
decides to approve the admissions of 22 candidates where the University found no Ki ran discrepancy.
for approval 01- Dutonde Neha Vilas
03-Wadkar Rohini H.
01- Choudhari Mayuri Mukesh
02- Ghugre Neha Tanaji
03- Rathi Rushika Vallabh
On the basis of report of University Samiti
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. Samiti directs the College/Institute to submit the relevant documents to prove the NRI status in respect of Khushboo Christa admitted in NRI Quota
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 46 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Khushboo Tahilram One Candidate in NRI Quota PNS may verify NRI status of this candidate
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 22 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
04- Khan Minhal Shamshul Haque 05- ROY Sonal Mansoorali
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 08 candidates where the University found discrepancies,
Sr. No.
Name of College
b e
17 PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
I recommended I I
no Disclppancies hence Decision of the Samiti Name of the student
having Discrepancies
for approval 06- Sana Fatima subject to submission of required documents
Azizbhai 01- Sarwan Chaitanva
MVP College of Physiotherapy, Nashik
On the basis of report of University Samiti
Siddhakala, College of Physiotherapy, Sangamner
MIMERCollege of Physiotherapy, Latur
30
02- Bagdane Shubham Sharad
01- Kaushik Kshitij Milind
01- Patakh Anupama Nanand
17
to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 28 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti
13
decides to approve the admissions of 16 candidates where the University found no
, discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject
Narayan 02- Shaikh Saba Abdulrank 03- Thapa Rina
04- Bhingare Sneha Ravindra
decides to approve the admissions of 13 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 04 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
/- -- in"
* 2 18 PNS(Medica1)
1 7 ~ ~ January 2012 No. of
Students have
Decision of the Samiti Sr* No.
no
hence
Dr.Ulhas Patil College of Physiotherapy, Jalgaon
Name of the student having Discrepancies Name of College
30
MGM College of Physiotherapy,Aurang abad
I I I
\ On the basis of r e ~ o r t of Universitv Samiti
recommended for approval
30
decides to approv;! the admission; of 16 candidates where the University found no
Q Y
E H
to submission of required documents to the University.
1 01- Halami Pankaj Ganesh I di"ancyq.
*i ' 3 - 4
I where the University foind discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
02- Pachore Manoj Aba 03- Wakode Mugda
1 to the University. I On the basis of r e ~ o r t of University Samiti
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remainina 03 candidates
01- Jadhav Pranjal Sakharam
decides to approve the admissions of 15 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of reauired documents
MAEER,College of
to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 24 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
physiotherapy Talegaon,(D), Pune
24 30 Mohini Ramesh 25 Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
DES, College of l3 Physiotherapy, Pune
Sr' No.
P.E.Soc. Modern 14 College of
Physiotherapy. Pune
Kashibai 15 NavaleCollege of
Physiotherapy, Pune
Name of College
No. of 1 Students have al 3 3 c u
Name of the student having Discrepancies
*i .- E 'FI 4
recommended for approval
no Discrepancies
hence
01- Devmitra Chandrakant Wakanrao
02-Suryawanshi Neha Sanjay
01- Kadam Sushant Vishwas 02- Rathod Payal Gulab
01- Pawar Shrushti Sanjay
1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
Decision of the Samiti
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 28 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 21 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to <he University. On the basis oT r e~o r t of UniversiW Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 15 candidates where the University found no
1 discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the Universi .
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 25 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 05 candidates
1 1 / 05- Tiwari A~arna ) where the University found discrepancies, I I I me-, ...-- " ' ( subject tn zllhrnizzinn. nf renllired documents
( 01- Dagani Pankaj
02- Prachi Vikas Sarangale
to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 07 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates
I decides to a ~ ~ r o v e the admissions of 25 Ol- Pandeva Kavita
candidates w'h'ere the University found no discrepancy.
7 C
where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of rewrt of University Samiti
L2 ( 04- Shande Paneri Alesh 1 Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 06 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of reauired documents
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 05 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of Universitv Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 19 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 47 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 27 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 39 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 11 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 14 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 09 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
Late Kedare Redekar Ayurved College, Gadhinlaj, Kolhapur
Sr. No
No. of
I - .
1 1 recommended I I for approval I
I I I
Name of the student having Discrepancies Name of the College Decision of the Samiti I
S 8 C Y
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 14 candidates where the University found no discrepancy. 1. Joyti Patil
2. Rathod Santosh 3. Todkar Kedar
Shri Annasaheb Dange Ayurved College, Sangli Samiti further decides to approve the
admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the Universi
= 8 E w
Students having
hence
17 17 14
L~,'&' 25 PNS(Medica1)
1 7 ~ ~ January 2012 Report of Expert Committee in respect of eliqibilitv and approval of admission done in Academic Year 2011-12
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 10 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 17 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 08 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admission of remaining 01 candidate where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 22 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
g 'g '21
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 20 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
Foster Development's HMC, Aurangabad
having Discmpancies
hence recommended
1 20 Hadke Manisha 1 On the basis of report of University Samiti
decides to approve the admissions of 29 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Decision of the Samiti
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 07 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documenk
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 18 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 10 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 07 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 11 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admission-s of 11 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents
01 candidate is admitted in against NRI quota. Dr. Dhole Chandan has not appeared for APGH CFT 2011. PNS May verify the NRI Status of this Candidate.
Shri JPES1s HMC, Tararani Chowk, Kolhapur
having Discrepancies
hence recommended
1. Walkhindi Pooja 2. Sonar Raviraj
Name of the student having Discrepancies
PNS(Medica1) 1 7 ~ ~ January 2012
I
Decision of the Samiti
On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 06 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 03 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University. On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admission of 01 candidate where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti decides to approve the admissions of remaining 05 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
Samiti further directs to the College/Institute to the submit the relevant documents to prove the NRI status in respect of the Candidate viz. - Dr. Dhole Chandan On the basis of report of University Samiti decides to approve the admissions of 04 candidates where the University found no discrepancy.
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 02 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.
Admissions of following 06 candidates cannot be approved because they have secured less than requisite marks in APGH Cl3 2011. The details are given below.
I Name 1 CFT I Cat. I ( Patne Swarupa Shingi Reddy Suryanwa nshi
I
Marks 120
117
113
Satish Vadde
I Shrikant ( 1 Dr.Kirankumar Sadinapu is
Open
Open
Open
Dinesh Patale
1
I admitted under OBC category & secured 111 marks in APGH
1 C l 3 2011. This candidate is out of Maharashtra State Candidate & not eligible as per Govt. circular No. lhchlh& 1290$23116$iz- i ~ ~ ~ l n h 1 7 - r ~
96 Prasad Sawant 1 91 I Open
Decision of the Samiti
112
Open
Samiti decides not to approved the admission of 07 candidates viz. - 1) Patne Swarupa, 2) Shingi Reddy, 3) Suryanwanshi Dinesh, 4) Patale Satish, 5) Vadde Prasad, 6) Sawant Shrikant and 7) Dr. Kirankumar Sadinapu on the basis of the candidates has not secured requisite marks in APGH-Cn- 2011, as observed by the University.
Open
Samiti further decides to approve the admissions of remaining 05 candidates where the University found discrepancies, subject to submission of required documents to the University.