Top Banner

of 61

7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

Mar 07, 2016

Download

Documents

naefmubarak

Offshore drilling #7A
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    1/61

    TAMU - PemexWell Control

    Lesson 7

    Pore Pressure Prediction

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    2/61

    2

    Contents

    Porosity

    Shale Compaction

    Equivalent Depth MethodRatio Method

    Drilling Rate

    dC-Exponent

    Moores Technique

    Coms Method

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    3/61

    3

    Pore pressure prediction

    methods

    Most pore pressure prediction

    techniques rely on measured or in!erredporosity"

    The shale compaction theory is the

    asis !or these predictions"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    4/61

    4

    Pore pressure prediction methods

    Measure the porosity indicator #e"g"density$ in normally pressured% clean

    shales to estalish a normal trend line"

    &hen the indicator suggests porosityvalues that are higher than the trend% then

    anormal pressures are suspected to e

    present"

    The magnitude o! the deviation !rom the

    normal trend line is used to quanti!y the

    anormal pressure"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    5/61

    5

    2. Extrapolate

    normal trend

    line

    1. Establish NormalTrend !ine in "ood

    clean shale

    Tra siti

    Porosit# should

    decrease $ith

    depth in normall#

    pressured shales

    %. &etermine the

    ma"nitude

    o' the de(iation

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    6/61

    6

    'lder shales have had

    more time to compact%

    so porosities (ould

    tend to e lo(er #at a

    particular depth$"

    )se the trend line

    closest to the transition"

    *ines may or may note parallel"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    7/617

    D

    De

    E)ui(alent &epth Method

    The normally compacted

    shale at depth Dehas the

    same compaction as the

    anormally pressured

    shale at D" Thus%

    V= Ve

    i.e., ob- pp= obe- pne

    pp

    = pne

    + (ob

    - obe

    )

    ob= V+ pp

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    8/618

    Example 2.*

    Estimate the pore pressure at +,%,, i! the

    equivalent depth is .%+,," The normal pore

    pressure gradient is ,"/00 psi1!t" The

    overurden gradient is +", psi1!t"

    2t .%+,,% pne3 ,"/00 4 .%+,, 3 0%./, psig

    2t .%+,,% oe3 +",, 4 .%+,, 3 .%+,, psig

    2t +,%,,% o3 +",,4+,%,, 3 +,%,, psig

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    9/619

    +olution

    pp3 pne5 #o- oe$ 66666" #"+0$ 3 0%./, 5 #+,%,, 7 .%+,,$

    pp, /0/ psi"

    The pressure gradient%

    gp3 8%,/,1+,%,,3 ,"/./ psi1!t

    EM& 3 ,"/./1,",8 , . pp"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    10/6110

    Xn

    Xo

    The atio Method

    uses #9o19n$ to predict

    the magnitude o! the

    anormal pressure

    &e can use:

    ;drilling rate

    ;resistivities

    ;conductivities

    ;sonic speeds

    +hale Porosit 3ndicator

    &epth

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    11/61

    11

    Pore pressures can be

    predicted4

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    12/61

    12

    5e'ore drillin" the $ell

    6plannin"7

    =n!ormation !rom neary (ells

    2nalogy to >no(n characteristics o! the

    geologic asin

    Seismic data

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    13/61

    13

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    14/61

    14

    Table 2.* 8 Cont9d

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    15/61

    15

    +eismic +ur(e#s% as used in conventional geophysical

    prospecting% can yield much in!ormation aout underground

    structures% and depths to those structures" ?aults% diapirs% etc"

    may indicate possile locations o! anormal pressures

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    16/61

    16

    T#pical +eismic +ection

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    17/61

    17

    )nder normal

    compaction% density

    increases (ithdepth" ?or this

    reason the interval

    velocity also

    increases (ith

    depth% so travel

    time decreases

    t = tma(1-) + tf

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    18/61

    18

    +ound mo(es 'aster in

    more dense medium

    =n air at sea level%

    @sound3 +%+,, !t1sec

    =n distilled (ater%

    @sound

    3 /%A,, !t1sec

    =n lo( density% high porosity

    roc>s%

    @sound3 A%,,,!t1sec

    =n dense dolomites%

    @sound3 ,%,,, !t1sec

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    19/61

    19

    Example 2.:

    )se the data in Tale "B to determine

    the top o! the transition one% and

    estimate the pore pressure at +.%,,,

    using the equivalent depth method

    using Pennea>ers empirical correlation

    =gnore the data et(een .%,,, and++%,,," 2ssume Eatons ul! Coast

    overurden gradient"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    20/61

    20

    +olution

    Plot interval travel time vs" depth onsemilog paper #?ig" "0+$

    Plot normal trend line using the A%,,,-.%,,, data"

    ?rom ?ig" ",% at +.%,,,% go3 ,"..8

    psi1!t

    #o$+.%,,,3 ,"..8 4 +.%,,, 3 +%.,8 psig

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    21/61

    21

    Use

    !no"e

    E)ui(alent &epth

    Method4

    ?rom the vertical line%De3 %,,,

    oe3 ,"B8 4 %,,,

    3+%B8, #?ig" ",$

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    22/61

    22

    Penneba

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    23/61

    23

    Comparison

    Pore Pressure at a depth o' 1/// 't4

    Pennea>er:

    +%,8, psi or ,".8, psi1!t or +"0 ppg

    Equivalent Depth Method:

    +%,8 psi or ,".8 psi1!t or +"0 ppg

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    24/61

    24

    ?hile &rillin"

    dc-exponent

    M&D G *&D

    Hic>s

    'ther drilling rate !actors #Tale "8$

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    25/61

    25

    TABLE 2.5 -

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    26/61

    26

    Penetration rate and abnormal pressure

    !aster than through normally pressured

    roc> #i! everything else remains the

    same$"

    &hen drilling in clean shales this !act

    can e utilied to detect the presence

    o! anormal pressure% and even toestimate the ma"nitudeo! the

    overpressure"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    27/61

    27

    Iote% that many !actors can in!luence the drilling rate%

    and some o! these !actors are outside the control o!

    the operator"

    TABLE 2.8 -

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    28/61

    28

    E''ect o' bit $ei"ht and h#draulics

    on penetration rate

    =nadequate

    hydraulics or

    excessive

    imedding o!

    the it teeth in

    the roc>

    Drilling rate

    increases more

    or less linearly

    (ith increasing

    it (eight"

    2 signi!icantdeviation !rom

    this trend may

    e caused y

    poor ottom

    hole cleaning

    /

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    29/61

    29

    E''ect o' &i''erential Pressure on &rillin" ate

    Di!!erentialpressure is the

    di!!erence et(een

    (ellore pressure

    and pore !luidpressure

    &ecrease can be due to4

    ;The chip hold do$n e''ect

    ;The e''ect o' $ellbore

    pressure on roc< stren"th

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    30/61

    30

    &rillin"

    underbalanced

    can !urther

    increase the

    drilling rate"

    Th hi h ld d '' t

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    31/61

    31

    The chip hold-do$n e''ect

    The mud pressure

    acting on the

    ottom o! the hole

    tends to hold the

    roc> chips in

    place

    3mportant hold-do$n parameters4

    'veralance Drilling !luid !iltration rate

    Permeaility Method o! rea>ing roc> #shear or crushing$

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    32/61

    32

    ;Drilling rates are in!luenced y roc> strengths"

    ;'nly drilling rates in relatively clean shales are use!ul !or

    predicting anormal pore pressures"

    TABLE 2.9 -

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    33/61

    33

    ois generallythe maximum in

    situ principal

    stress in

    undistured roc>

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    34/61

    34

    +tresses on +ubsur'ace oc

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    35/61

    35

    +tresses on +ubsur'ace oc% and cannot de!orm

    the roc>"

    Mohr-Coulom ehavior is controlled ythe the e!!ective stresses #matrix$"

    &hen drilling occurs the stresses

    change"

    ois replaced y dynamic drilling !luidpressure"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    36/61

    36

    The degree o!

    overalance no(

    controls the

    strength o! the

    roc> ahead o! the

    it"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    37/61

    37

    oc< 'ailure caused b# roller cone bit.

    The di!!erential pressure !rom aove provides

    the normal stress% o

    'o"mation f"a#t"e is "esiste b* te sea" st"ess, o,i# is a fn#tion of te "o# #oesion an te f"i#tion

    beteen te pates. /is f"i#tion epens on o.

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    38/61

    38

    >i". 2.01 - &i''erential Pressure /.1 in belo$ the bit.

    &hen ois replaced y phyd#lo(er$ the roc> immediately elo( theit (ill undergo an increase in pore volume% associated (ith a

    reduction in pore pressure"

    =n sandstone this pressure is increased y !luid loss !rom the mud"

    (n#e

    iffe"entia

    "ess"e in

    mpe"meabe

    "o#.

    ' t*)

    @ertical +tress , 1//// psi

    oriBontal +tress , :/// psi

    Pore Pressure , 0:// psi?ellbore Pressure , 0:// psi

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    39/61

    39

    &rillin" ate as a Pore

    Pressure PredictorPenetration rate depends on a numer

    o! di!!erent parameters"

    R 3 H#P+$a+ #P-$a- #P0$a06 #Pn$an

    2 modi!ied version o! this equation is:

    d

    bd

    WNKR

    = 3

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    40/61

    40

    &rillin" ate as a Pore

    Pressure Predictor

    'r% in its most

    used !orm:

    iniamete",5it)

    .bf,5it ei!+t

    e7ponent))

    "pm8

    ft$+"9

    10

    12

    .o!

    60.o!

    b

    6

    ==

    =

    ==

    =

    bd

    W

    N

    R

    d

    d

    bd

    WNKR

    = 3

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    41/61

    41

    d-exponent

    The d-exponent normalies R !or any

    variations in &% dand I

    )nder normal compaction% R shoulddecrease (ith depth" This (ould cause

    d to increase (ith depth"

    2ny deviation !rom the trend could e

    caused y anormal pressure"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    42/61

    42

    d-exponent

    Mud (eight also a!!ects R6""

    2n adJustment to d may e made:

    dc3 d #n1c$(here

    dc3 exponent corrected !or mud density

    n3 normal pore pressure gradient

    c 3 e!!ective mud density in use

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    43/61

    43

    Example

    &hile drilling in a ul! Coast shale%

    R 3 8, !t1hr

    & 3 ,%,,, l!

    I 3 +,, RPM

    ECD 3 +,"+ ppg #Equivalent Circulating Density$

    d3 "8 in

    Calculate d and dc

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    44/61

    44

    +olution

    0/"+d

    88/"+

    ,B."

    8"4+,

    ,,,%,4+log

    +,,4A,

    8,log

    d

    A

    =

    =

    =

    bd

    W

    N

    R

    d

    *1/

    12lo"

    */lo"

    c

    n

    c dd

    +."+d

    +"+,4,8",/A8",0/"+d

    c

    c

    =

    =

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    45/61

    45

    Example 2.

    Predict pore pressure at A%,8, !t #ppg$:

    !rom data in Tale "+, using:

    Rhem and McClendons correlation

    Kamoras correlation

    The equivalent depth method

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    46/61

    46

    TA5!E 2.1/

    d-E9P'IEIT2ID M)D

    DEIS=TL D2T2

    ?'R 2 &E**

    *'C2TED'??SF'RE

    *')=S=2I2

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    47/61

    47

    +tep 1 is to plot the

    data on Cartesian

    paper 6>i". 2.0%7.

    Transition at /%B,, !t

    6or is it a !ault

    Seismic data and

    geological indicators

    suggest a possile

    transition at 8%B,, !t"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    48/61

    48

    >i". 2.0%

    ope of 0.000038 ft-1

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    49/61

    49

    ehm and McClendon

    gp3 ,"0. log #dcn-dco$ 5 ,"A

    3 ,"0. log #+"+ - ,".8$ 5 ,"A"p, /.*/* psi't

    p3 ,"A,A 1 ,",8 , 11.: pp"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    50/61

    50

    Damora

    >rom >i". 2.00

    gp3 gn#dcn1dco$

    3 ,"/A8 4 #+"+1".8$

    gp3 ,"8B psi1!t

    p3 ,"8B1,",8

    p, 11.1 pp"

    1.180.95

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    51/61

    51

    E)ui(alent

    &epth Method

    ?rom ?ig" ",% at

    A%,8, !t%

    go3 ,".+8 psi1!t

    o3 ,".+8 4 A%,8,3 8%80A psi

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    52/61

    52

    E)ui(alent

    &epth Method

    ?rom ?ig" "/0%

    Equivalent Depth

    3 B8, !t

    2t B8, !t%

    oe3 ,"A 4 B8,

    3 A/8 psipne3 ,"/A8 4 B8,

    3 0/. psig

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    53/61

    53

    E)ui(alent &epth Method

    ?rom Eq" "+0% at A%,8, !t

    pp3 pne5 #o- oe$

    pp3 0/. 5 #8%80A - A/8$ 3 8%/, psigp3 +."8 4 #8%/, 1 A%,8,$ 3 +A"B ppg

    Perhaps the equivalent depth method isnot al(ays suitale !or ppprediction

    using dc NN

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    54/61

    54

    'verlays such as this can e

    handy% ut

    e care!ul that the scale is

    correct !or the graph paper

    eing usedO

    the slope is correct !ornormal trendsO

    the correct overlay !or the

    !ormation is utilied"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    55/61

    55

    To impro(e pore pressure predictions

    usin" (ariations in drillin" rate4

    Try to >eep it (eight and rpm relatively

    constant (hen ma>ing measurements

    )se do(nhole #M&D$ it (eights (hen

    these are availale" #?rictional drag in

    directional (ells can cause large errors$

    2dd geological interpretation (hen

    possile" M&D can help here also"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    56/61

    56

    3mpro(ed pore pressure

    predictions

    Heep in mind that tooth (ear can

    greatly in!luence penetration rates"

    )se common sense and engineering

    Judgment"

    )se several techniques and compare

    results"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    57/61

    57

    Moores Technique

    >i". 2.0

    Moore proposed a practical

    method !or maintaining a

    pore-pressure overalance

    (hile drilling into atransition"

    Drilling parameters must e>ept constant !or this

    technique to (or>"

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    58/61

    58

    Comb9s Method

    Coms attempted to improve on the

    use o! drilling rate !or pore pressure y

    correcting !or:

    hydraulics

    di!!erential pressure

    it (ear

    in addition to &% d% and I

    C b9 M th d

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    59/61

    59

    Comb9s Method

    ( ) ( )Id

    a

    n

    aa

    d t!p!dd.A

    q-,,I

    d8,,%0&RR

    qI&

    =

    : = #i"#atin! "ate

    n= iamete" of one bit no;;e

    f(p) = fn#tion "eate to te iffe"entia p"ess"e

    f(t) = fn#tion "eate to bit ea"

    a= bit ei!t eponent = 1.0 fo" offso"e

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    60/61

    60

    Tooth $ear 'actor

    Correction(ould depend

    upon it type%

    roc> hardness%

    and

    arasiveness

    &i''erential press re 'actor

  • 7/21/2019 7A. Pore Pressure Prediction

    61/61

    &i''erential pressure 'actor