Top Banner
12

7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

Jan 22, 2018

Download

Education

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)
Page 2: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

Chapters from Hughes’ Testing for Language Teachers

8. Common Test techniques: Elaine, 24th

9. Testing Writing: Marta, Idoia, 22nd

10. Testing Oral Abilities: Paula, Ángela, 24th

11. Testing Reading: Lucía, 24th

12. Testing Listening: Lorena, 22nd

13. Testing Grammar and Vocabulary: Clara, Cristina,

22nd

14. Testing Overall Ability: Jefferson, 22nd

15. Tests for Young Learners: Tania, Diego, 24th

Page 3: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

8. Common Test Techniques• Features: Reliable

Valid

Reliably scored

Economical

Beneficial Washback effect

• Multiple choice: Advantages/Disadvantages

• Yes/No, True/False: like multiple choice

• Short Answer: Adv./Disadv.

• Gap-Filling

Page 4: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

1. Set representative tasks

1. Specify all possible content

2. Include a representative sample of the specified content2. Elicit valid samples of writing ability

1. Set as many separate tasks as feasible

2. Test only writing ability and nothing else

3. Restrict candidates3. Ensure valid and reliable scoring:

1. Set as many tasks as possible

2. Restrict candidates

3. Give no choice of tasks

4. Ensure long enough samples

5. Create appropriate scales for scoring: HOLISTIC/ANALYTIC

6. Calibrate the scale to be used

7. Select and train scorers

8. Follow acceptable scoring procedures

9. Avoid Taboo topics

Page 5: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

• “The most highly prized language skill”, Lado’s Language Testing (1961).

• Challenges: Ephemeral, intangible. Simultaneous assessment. Solutions? Very stressful!

• Features of oral speech: inaccuracy, unfinished sentences, less precision, generic vocabulary, pauses

• Contrast US/UK: Certificate of Proficiency in English (1913) already included it, TOEFL only in 2005 iBT

• Key notion: not accent, but intelligibility • Very different approaches. Indirect Direct (Cambridge, EOIs) or Semi-direct (TOEFL ibt, OTE,

Aptis). Conflict with the American tradition. The future?: Fully automated L2 speaking tests: Versant test,

Speechrater.

• Not only speaking, also interaction

Page 6: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

1. Set representative tasks

1. Specify all possible content

2. Include a representative sample of the specified content

2. Elicit valid samples of oral ability.

1. Techniques:

1. Interview :Questions, pictures, role play, interpreting (L1 to L2),

prepared monologue, reading aloud

2. Interaction: discussion, roleplay

3. Responses to audio- or video-recordings (semi-direct)

2. Plan and structure the test carefully

1. Make the oral test as long as it is feasible

2. Plan the test carefully

3. As many tasks (“fresh starts”) as possible

4. Use a second tester

5. Set only tasks that candidates could do easily in L1

Page 7: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

Plan and structure the test carefully (2)

1. Quiet room with good acoustics

2. Put candidates at ease (at first, easy questions, not assessed,

problem with note-taking?)

3. Collect enough relevant information

4. Do not talk too much

5. (select interviewers carefully and train them)

1. Ensure valid and reliable scoring:

1. Create appropriate scales for scoring: HOLISTIC/ANALYTIC. Calibrate

the scale to be used

2. Select and train scorers (different from interviewers if possible)

3. Follow acceptable scoring procedures

Page 8: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

PROBLEMS: Indirect assessment: We read in very different ways: scanning, skimming, inferring,

intensive, extensive reading…

SOME TIPS As many texts and operations as possible (Dialang). Avoid texts which deal with general knowledge Avoid disturbing topics, or texts students might have read Use authentic texts Techniques: better short answer and gap filling than multiple

choice Task difficulty can be lower than text difficulty Items should follow the order of the text Make items independent of each other Do not take into account errors of grammar or spelling Instructions: Easy to understand, even in L1 If higher stakes, trialling/piloting is essential Provide an example of the task.

Page 9: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

PROBLEMS As in listening: Indirect assessment and different ways of listening As in speaking: Transient nature of speech, Redundancy is typical Anxiety!!! (everything in real time, no re-reading, can’t stop, or slow

down)http://www.usingenglish.com/articles/why-your-students-have-problems-with-listening-comprehension.html

TIPS: Same as in reading If recording is used, make it as natural as possible Items should be far apart in the text Give students time to become familiar with the tasks Techniques: apart from multiple choice, shot answers and gap filling,

information transfer, note taking, partial dictation, transcription Moderation is essential Write ítems after listening, not looking at the script No general knowledge, no “common-sense” questions Follow the order of the speech Independent items How many times?

Page 10: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

GRAMMAR Why? Easy to test, Content validity Why not? Harmful washback effect It depends on the type of test. Specifications: Core Inventory/English Profile Techniques: Gap filling, rephrasings, completion Don’t penalize for mistakes that were not tested (-s if

the item is testing relatives, for example)

VOCABULARY Why (not)? Specifications: use frequency considerations (English

Profile) Techniques:

Recognition: Recognise synonims, recognise definitions, recognise appropriate word for context

Production: pictures, definitions, gap filling,

Page 11: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

Useful in particular tests where washback is notimportant (placement tests, for example) Cloze test (from closure). Based on the idea

of “reduced redundancy”. Subtypes: Selected deletion cloze Conversational cloze

C-Tests: second half of every second worddeleted. Example: “The passen___ sits bes___ the dri___”

Dictation: Long tradition. Easy to create and administer, but difficult to score properly.

Main problema of all these techniques : horrible washback effect.

Page 12: 7.2 assessment and the cefr (2)

TIPS

- Make testing and assessment an integral part of teaching

- Feedback: immediate and positive

- Self assessment

- Washback more important than ever

- Short tasks (short attention span)

- Use stories and games

- Use pictures and color

- Don’t forget that children are still developing L1 and cognitive abilities

- Include interaction

- Use colour and drawing

- Use cartoon stories

- Long warm-ups in speaking

- Use cards and pictures