SILICA 269 7. ANALYTICAL METHODS The purpose of this chapter is to describe the analytical methods that are available for detecting, measuring, and/or monitoring silica, its metabolites, and other biomarkers of exposure and effect to silica. The intent is not to provide an exhaustive list of analytical methods. Rather, the intention is to identify well-established methods that are used as the standard methods of analysis. Many of the analytical methods used for environmental samples are the methods approved by federal agencies and organizations such as EPA and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Other methods presented in this chapter are those that are approved by groups such as the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and the American Public Health Association (APHA). Additionally, analytical methods are included that modify previously used methods to obtain lower detection limits and/or to improve accuracy and precision. 7.1 BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS Limited analytical methods reported the analysis of c-silica or a-silica in biological materials. All forms of silica are considered to be poorly soluble particles. Inhaled silica particles, not cleared by mucociliary escalators or coughing, are embedded and remain in the lung (Cox 2011). OSHA method PV2121 characterizes the term ‘respirable dust’ as dust particle sizes with a median diameter of 3.5 µm; however, NIOSH Method 0600 lists a diameter size of 4 µm (NIOSH 1998; OSHA 2015). The European standard PN-EN 481:1998 and international standard PN-ISO 7708:2001 describe the term ‘respirable dust’ as a cumulated log-normal distribution, with the median diameter of 4.25 µm and geometric standard deviation of 1.5 (Maciejewska 2008). NIOSH (2003b) Analytical Method 7601 is a standardized method used to determine the concentration of c-silica by x-ray diffraction (XRD) with filter redeposition in respirable or total dust, settled dust, and biological samples, although studies describing the use of this method with biological samples were not identified. 7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES Table 7-1 lists the methods used for determining silica in environmental samples. Silica is a common material in the environment with many distinct forms. Determination of the form of silica present and concentration of each form of silica in a sample may be achieved through several different analytical ***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT***
8
Embed
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS - Agency for Toxic Substances … · 7. ANALYTICAL METHODS ... diameter of 3.5 µm; however, NIOSH Method 0600 lists a diameter size of 4 µm (NIOSH 1998; OSHA
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
SILICA 269
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the analytical methods that are available for detecting,
measuring, and/or monitoring silica, its metabolites, and other biomarkers of exposure and effect to silica.
The intent is not to provide an exhaustive list of analytical methods. Rather, the intention is to identify
well-established methods that are used as the standard methods of analysis. Many of the analytical
methods used for environmental samples are the methods approved by federal agencies and organizations
such as EPA and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Other methods
presented in this chapter are those that are approved by groups such as the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and the American Public Health Association (APHA). Additionally,
analytical methods are included that modify previously used methods to obtain lower detection limits
and/or to improve accuracy and precision.
7.1 BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS
Limited analytical methods reported the analysis of c-silica or a-silica in biological materials. All forms
of silica are considered to be poorly soluble particles. Inhaled silica particles, not cleared by mucociliary
escalators or coughing, are embedded and remain in the lung (Cox 2011).
OSHA method PV2121 characterizes the term ‘respirable dust’ as dust particle sizes with a median
diameter of 3.5 µm; however, NIOSH Method 0600 lists a diameter size of 4 µm (NIOSH 1998; OSHA
2015). The European standard PN-EN 481:1998 and international standard PN-ISO 7708:2001 describe
the term ‘respirable dust’ as a cumulated log-normal distribution, with the median diameter of 4.25 µm
and geometric standard deviation of 1.5 (Maciejewska 2008).
NIOSH (2003b) Analytical Method 7601 is a standardized method used to determine the concentration of
c-silica by x-ray diffraction (XRD) with filter redeposition in respirable or total dust, settled dust, and
biological samples, although studies describing the use of this method with biological samples were not
identified.
7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES
Table 7-1 lists the methods used for determining silica in environmental samples. Silica is a common
material in the environment with many distinct forms. Determination of the form of silica present and
concentration of each form of silica in a sample may be achieved through several different analytical
***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT***
SILICA 270
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
Table 7-1. Analytical Methods for Determining Silica in Environmental Samples
Sample matrix Preparation method
Analytical method
Sample detection limit
Percent recovery Reference
Air (dust) Collection with 10-mm nylon cyclone and 5-µm PVC membrane
Method 7500; XRD
0.005 mg SiO2
per sample 0.08
±18% (accuracy)
NIOSH 2003a
Air (dust) Collection with PVC membrane filter
P-2; XRD 20 µg quartz ±20% (accuracy)
MHSA 2013b
Air (dust) Collection with 25 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane filter or Ag filter (XRD), according to MDHS 14/3
MDHS 101; FT-IR or XRD
FT-IR: 20 µg XRD: 10 µg RSD 0.087
±20% (accuracy 0.5–2.0 limit value)
MHSA 2005
Air (dust) Collection with 10-mm nylon cyclone and 37 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane
Method 7602; IR
0.005 mg SiO2
per sample RSD <0.15
Not reported
NIOSH 2003d
Air (dust) Collection with 10-mm nylon cyclone and 0.8-µm MCE or 5-µm PVC membrane
Method 7501; XRD
5 µg quartz Not reported
NIOSH 2003c
Air (dust) 37 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane
ID-142; XRD
20 µg quartz RSD 0.11
±26% (error)
OSHA 1996
Air (dust) Collection with 10-mm nylon cyclone and 37 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane
Method 7603; IR, FT-IR
10 µg quartz RSD 0.098
±25.6 to 43.4% (accuracy)
NIOSH 2003e
Air (dust) Collection with membrane filter
P-7; IR 20 µg quartz ±13% (accuracy)
MHSA 2013
Air (dust) Collection with 37 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane
MDHS 37; IR
Varies with particle size
Not reported
NIOSH 2002
Air (dust) Collection with 37 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane
MDHS 38; IR
Varies with particle size
Not reported
NIOSH 2002
Air (dust) Collection with membrane filter
IR 5–27 µg quartz 6–16 µg cristobalite
Not reported
Foster and Walker 1984
Air (dust) Collection with 10-mm nylon cyclone and 0.8-µm MCE or 5-µm PVC membrane
Method 7601; VIS
10 µg SiO2 per sample RSD 0.09
Not reported
NIOSH 2003b
Air (dust) and soil
48% HBF4 at 70°C, filter, dissolve in 1:1 KHCO3
and KCl, boiling water, add 0.1 mL 10%
Spectrophotometer
8 µg quartz 99.8% Stopford 1994
ammonium molybdate, adjust pH to 2.1
Air (dust) Collection with 37 mm, 5-µm PVC membrane
LIBS 0.16 µg/cm2 10% (relative errors)
Stipe et al. 2012
***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT***
SILICA 271
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
Table 7-1. Analytical Methods for Determining Silica in Environmental Samples
Sample Analytical Sample Percent matrix Preparation method method detection limit recovery Reference Water Filter sample with Spectro 2 mg silica/L Not NPDES 1978 (dissolved silica)
0.45-µm membrane filter; add molybdate ion in
photometer/ EPA 370.1
reported
acidic solution to filtrate; the color complex is measured
Water Add molybdate ion in Spectro 0.1 mg silica/L Not USGS 1989 (dissolved ascorbic acid solution to photometer/ reported silica) filtrate; the color complex USGS
is measured NWQL I-2700-85
Water Filtered, acid preserved ICP-AES/ 26 µg/L 96–104% EPA 1994b (dissolved sample is mixed with 1% EPA 200.7 (estimated) (in tap silica) v/v HNO3 water) Water Samples are solubilized ICP-AES/ 0.017 mg/L Not EPA 2000 (dissolved or digested prior to EPA 6010c (estimated) reported silica) analysis Water Sample undergoes a ICP-AES/ 0.01 mg/L Not USGS 1987 (dissolved direct-reading, no USGS (estimated) reported silica) preparation NWQL
I-1472-87 Water Acidify sample with HNO3 AVICP 0.01 mg silica/L Not EPA 2003 (dissolved to pH <2 AES/EPA reported silica) 200.5 Water Acidify sample with HNO3 ICP-OES/ Not reported Not USGS 1998 (dissolved to pH <2 USGS reported silica) NWQL
I-4471-97 Soil LiCO3 /H3BO3 flux and AAS Not reported 99.7% Barredo and Diez
stabilization with fluoride 1980 Soil Sample weighed Thermal <1% Not Sheffield 1994
analysis reported
AAS = atomic absorption spectroscopy; AVICP-AES = axially viewed inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry; EPA = Environmental Protection Agency; FT-IR = Fourier transform infrared spectrometry; ICP-AES = inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry; ICP-OES = inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry; IR = infrared spectrometry; MCE = mixed cellulose ester; MSHA = Mine Safety and Health Administration; NIOSH = National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; NWQL = National Water Quality Laboratory; OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PVC = polyvinyl chloride; RSD = relative standard deviation; USGS = U.S. Geological Survey; VIS = visible absorption spectrophotometry; XRD = x-ray diffraction
***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT***
SILICA 272
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
techniques. The use of XRD and infrared spectroscopy (IR) allows for the separate determination of
quartz, cristobalite, and tridymite (Maciejewska 2008). The total content of all crystalline forms of silica
is obtained with visible absorption spectrophotometry. Optical microscopy, electron microscopy, thermal
analysis, selective dissolution, and density separation may also be used to analyze silica. Several
analytical methods have been reported by regulatory agencies including NIOSH, OSHA, USGS, and
MSHA.
Mineral interferences may be reduced prior to analysis with sample preparation techniques; for example,
a phosphoric acid digestion is used if there is a presence of a-silica (Talvitie 1951). a-Silica and some
smaller c-silica particles dissolve in phosphoric acid (Eller 1999). c-Silica particles <3 µm dissolve in hot
phosphoric acid; therefore, the amount of free silica may be underestimated when using this method
(Yabuta and Ohta 2003). Hydrochloric acid is used to remove calcite, magnetite, and hematite. Air
samples collected with filters are ashed or dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (NIOSH 2003f). The ashed
sample is suspended in a solvent and deposited onto an analytical filter. Another preparation method used
to obtain the free silica in respirable dust samples uses pyrophosphoric acid and a closed vessel
dissolution technique with microwave heating (Shinohara 1993).
Particle-size distribution of silica samples is measured by laser scattering or air-jet screening (Florke et al.
2008). Cyclone air samples, filter cassette, and filter media are used to retain the respirable dust fraction
without non-respirable particles. Criteria for collecting particles of the appropriate size with cyclone air
samplers are established by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the European
Committee for Standardization (CEN), and ACGIH (NIOSH 2003f). The XRD, IR, and colorimetric
analytical methods are subject to different particle size effects, and each cyclone exhibits its own unique
(AVICP-AES) by EPA Method 200.5 (EPA 2003) and inductively coupled plasma/optical emission
spectrometry by USGS NWQL I-4471-97 (USGS 1998). Samples prepared by EPA Method 200.2 are
acidified, mixed, and held at a pH <2 (EPA 1994a).
The silica content of rock samples may be obtained by decomposing the sample in LiCO3/H3BO3 flux
followed by stabilization in fluoride (Barredo and Diez 1980). An atomic absorption spectrophotometer
(AAS) and EEL lamp are used to detect the major elements of the rock samples. Thermal analysis of
c-silica, to measure the energy associated with phase changes based on changes in temperatures of
samples, has also been developed (Sheffield 1994). An analytical procedure detects the a-silica content of
a sample by converting to cristobalite with heating (Lange et al. 1981).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) identifies minerals by energy dispersive techniques and sometimes
by morphology, but does not enable differentiation between the polymorphs of c-silica, a-silica, glasses,
and opal (Miles 1999). The transmission electron microscope (TEM), when combined with energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and electron diffraction, is used to distinguish grains of c-silica.
Differentiation of the forms of a-silica involves investigation into the chemical composition, physical
properties, and characteristics of the particles (Waddell 2006). The amount of silica, percentage of
associated water, total solids content of nonoxidizable materials, presence of stabilizers and carbon
content, level of soluble salts, metal impurities, and silanol group density are important chemical
composition information. The pH, density and tamped density, viscosity, turbidity, refractive index, and
light-scattering properties are important physical characteristics. Specific surface area, average particle
size and size distribution, sieve residue, porosity (including average pore diameter and pore volume),
degree of aggregation, and oil absorption information is used to characterize the silica particles. Although
analytical techniques exist to distinguish between a-silica polymorphs, most are too sophisticated for
routine measurements (IARC 1997). Therefore, environmental exposures are typically reported for
a-silica, rather than for specific polymorphs.
***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT***
SILICA 275
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
Particle-size measurement is important in silica-gel characterization. Granular gel standardized sieve
screening uses method ASTM D 4513. Static light scattering and conductivity methods are preferred for
particle size analysis of particles roughly 1–1,000 mm. Dynamic light scattering, electron microscopy,
and small-angle X-ray scattering are used for particle sizes of roughly 10–1,000 nm (Florke et al. 2008).
Porosity of silica gels is described by pore diameter as microporous (<2 nm), mesoporous (approximately
2–50 nm), or macroporous (>50 nm) (Florke et al. 2008). Thermogravimetric analysis, vibrational
spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance are used to study hydroxyl concentration, hydrogen bond
interaction between hydroxyl groups, and distribution of silica-oxygen species on the surface of silica gel
(Florke et al. 2008).
Density separation uses heavy liquids to separate particles and is based on differences in density of the
forms of silica and silicates (Miles 1999), although it is usually impossible to fully liberate c-silica from
other phases. This technique works best with (mono-mineral) mineral grains ≥0.1 mm.
7.3 ADEQUACY OF THE DATABASE
Section 104(i)(5) of CERCLA, as amended, directs the Administrator of ATSDR (in consultation with the
Administrator of EPA and agencies and programs of the Public Health Service) to assess whether
adequate information on the health effects of silica is available. Where adequate information is not
available, ATSDR, in conjunction with NTP, is required to assure the initiation of a program of research
designed to determine the health effects (and techniques for developing methods to determine such health
effects) of silica.
The following categories of possible data needs have been identified by a joint team of scientists from
ATSDR, NTP, and EPA. They are defined as substance-specific informational needs that if met would
reduce the uncertainties of human health assessment. This definition should not be interpreted to mean
that all data needs discussed in this section must be filled. In the future, the identified data needs will be
evaluated and prioritized, and a substance-specific research agenda will be proposed.
***DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT***
SILICA 276
7. ANALYTICAL METHODS
7.3.1 Identification of Data Needs
Methods for Determining Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect.
Exposure. As discussed in Section 3.12.2, no biomarkers of exposure have been identified for silica.
c-Silica has been detected in the urine of ceramic factory workers (Ibrahim et al. 2011) and development
of sensitive analytical methods may be useful in the assessment of whether urinary silica could be used as
a biomarker of exposure.
Effect. Sensitive biomarkers of effect have not been identified.
Methods for Determining Parent Compounds and Degradation Products in Environmental Media. Silica is ubiquitous in the environment and does not degrade. It is found in air, water, soil,
sediments, and food. Analytical methods exist for the analysis of silica in all of these environmental
media, and these methods have the sensitivity to measure background levels and detect elevated
concentrations due to anthropogenic sources (NIOSH 2002). Additional research to reduce chemical and
matrix interferences is needed to improve the speed and accuracy of the analyses.
7.3.2 Ongoing Studies
No ongoing studies regarding analytical methods for measuring silica in biological materials or