CEO & Director of Cardiology, Kailash Heart Institute NOIDA CEO & Director of Cardiology, Kailash Heart Institute NOIDA D S Gambhir MD, DM, FAMS, FACC D S Gambhir MD, DM, FAMS, FACC April 24, 08 BIOABSORBABLE POLYMER-BASED PACLITAXEL-ELUTING INFINNIUM STENT FOR MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE : ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF SIMPLE 3 REGISTRY BIOABSORBABLE POLYMER-BASED PACLITAXEL-ELUTING INFINNIUM STENT FOR MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE : ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF SIMPLE 3 REGISTRY TCT : Asia-Pacific Korea
29
Embed
6.D.S. Gambhir Drug Eluting Stent Registries · CEO & Director of Cardiology, Kailash Heart Institute NOIDA CEO & Director of Cardiology, Kailash Heart Institute NOIDA D S Gambhir
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CEO & Director of Cardiology,Kailash Heart Institute
NOIDA
CEO & Director of Cardiology,Kailash Heart Institute
To Assess the Safety and Efficacy of BioabsorbablePolymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting INFINNIUM Stent in “Real World Lesions” in Patients with MultivesselCoronary Artery Disease Requiring Multivessel Stenting
Safety : MACE at One Month: Acute / Subacute / Late Stent Thrombosis
Efficacy : MACE at 6 Months and One year : Need for TLR – Re PTCA / CABG
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
STUDY DESIGNSTUDY DESIGN
Included All Consecutive Patients of Multivessel CAD Between Nov. 2003 to June 2005, Requiring Treatment by MultivesselStenting
Single Centre, Prospective Observational Registry with Clinical Follow-up at One, Six and 12 Months
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADPATIENTS
INFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADPATIENTS
Number of Patients : 123
Period : Nov. ‘03 - June ‘05
Age Range : 31-73(Yrs.) Mean : 54±13
Sex Males : 101 (82.1%)Females : 22 (17.9%)
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
ACS / Unstable AnginaCh. Stable AnginaPost-MI AnginaAsymptomatic, Positive Stress Test After MIAcute MIAcute LVF
48242019
102
INFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADINFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CAD
INFINNUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADRISK FACTOR PROFILE
INFINNUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADRISK FACTOR PROFILE
Hypertension : 69 (56.1%)
Diabetes : 41 (33.3%)
Smoking : 16 (13%)
Dyslipidemia : 12 (9.7%)
Family H/O CAD : 11 (8.9%)
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
All Patients Informed of the Need and Significance of Using DESWritten Consent Obtained Prior to ProcedureFollowing Strategies / Options Used for Deployment of DES
Option I : Infinnium Stent for All Target LesionsOption II : Infinnium Stent in Combination with other DES :
- Cypher - SupralimusChoice of Non-Infinnium DES Influenced by Patient Preference and Availability of a Particular Size
INFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADSTRATEGY FOR DES SELECTION
INFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADSTRATEGY FOR DES SELECTION
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
ANGIOGRAPHIC PROFILE vs NUMBER OF VESSELS STENTEDANGIOGRAPHIC PROFILE vs NUMBER OF VESSELS STENTED(N)(N)
0102030405060708090
100110
75 (61%)
48 (39%)
24
24 2-Vs StentingN = 99 (81.5%)
3-Vs StentingN = 24 (18.5%)
2 VD 3 VD 2 VS 3 VSStentingDisease
Vessel Disease
2-VD : 75 (61%)3-VD : 48 (39%)
Vessel Stented
99
75
(81.5%)
(18.5%)
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
TARGET VESSELS STENTED
LAD + RCA 45.5%
56
RCA + LCx14.6%
LAD+LCx11.4% 18
1411
24Ramus + Other Br.
8.9%
LAD+LCx + RCA18.5%
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CADINFINNIUM FOR MULTIVESSEL STENTING IN CAD
Number of Lesions Stented : 381
Morphological Type of Lesions
Type A : 79 (20.7%)
Type B2 : 205 (53.8%)
Type C : 97 (25.5%)
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
Infinnium : 123 (n=304)
Cypher(n=42)
123 Patients (n=397)
+
+Supralimus
(n=51)
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CAD
USE OF OTHER DES
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CAD
USE OF OTHER DES
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADSTENT DETAILS
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADSTENT DETAILS
Number of Patients : 123
Number of Vessels Stented : 272
Number of DES Deployed : 397
Stents Deployed per Patient : 3.22
Stents Deployed per Vessel : 1.46
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADSTENT CHARACTERISTICS
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADSTENT CHARACTERISTICS
Stent Length (mm)Range : 11-39
Stent Diameter (mm)Range : 2.5 - 3.5
Length of Stented Segment (mm) in the Target Vessels
Range : 16-110Mean : 31.5 ± 16
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADPROCEDURAL RESULTS
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADPROCEDURAL RESULTS
Number of Target Vessels : 272
Successful Deployment of Stent in the Target Vessel : 270 (99.2%)
INFINNIUM FOR THREE VESSEL STENTINGINFINNIUM FOR THREE VESSEL STENTING
ZA
PrePre PrePre
PostPost
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
LCx - CTO
ZA
PrePre PostPost
INFINNIUM FOR THREE VESSEL STENTINGINFINNIUM FOR THREE VESSEL STENTING
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
LAD - DIFFUSE AND CALCIFIC DISEASE
ZA
PrePre PostPost
INFINNIUM FOR THREE VESSEL STENTINGINFINNIUM FOR THREE VESSEL STENTING
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING(RCA+OM+LAD)
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING(RCA+OM+LAD)
PCPPCPPCP
RCARCA RCARCAPrePre PostPost
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADINFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CAD
PCPPCP
LCxLCx LCxLCxPrePre PostPost
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADINFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CAD
PCPPCP
LADLAD LADLADPrePre PostPost
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADCONCLUSION (1)
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADCONCLUSION (1)
Bioabsorbable Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting INFINNIUMStent can be Deployed Successfully in Almost All Patients with Multivessel CAD Having Complex Lesions (B2&C)Multivessel Stenting Using INFINNIUM Stent with / without Other DES in Highly Complex Lesions is Safe with < 1% Risk of Acute / Subacute Stent Thrombosis and No Late Stent Thrombosis upto One Year of FUThe Stent is Highly Effective in Preventing Repeat Revascularization - Re-PTCA / CABG
SIMPLE IIISIMPLE III
DSG
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADCONCLUSION (2)
INFINNIUM FOR MV STENTING IN CADCONCLUSION (2)
Despite Using Multiple Stents Per Patient, the Cost of Treatment May be Comparable to CABG, Because of Relatively Lower Cost and Layered Pricing
Prospective Multicentric Randomized Trial Needed to Assess its Cost-Effectiveness in Comparison to CABG in MVD