This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
FILE No .520 08/22 '05 15:15 I D : COMM . PREPHREDNESS FAX : 8042253882 PAGE 2/ 28
COIMMONWEALTZI of WRGINU Ofice of the Governor
Mark R. Warner Gavemar
August 22,2005
The Honorable Anthony J. Principi Chairman Base Realignment and Closure Commission 2521 South Clark Street Arlington, Virginia 22202
Dear Chairman Principi:
Thank you for the opportunity to be with you and the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Commission on Saturday. The Commonwealth of Virginia remains firm in its commitment to NAS Oceana and to meeting the needs of the United States Navy. The paramount and compelling factor in your decision, we believe, must be those interests. Tne Navy has been consistent in multiple testimonies in stating its strong belief that NAS Oceana not only best meets their needs for the foreseeable future, but also that only NAS Oceana meets those needs.
Attached you will find depositions taken under oath earlier today from Admiral Fred Metz USN (Ret) and Captain Phil Grandfield USN (Ret) which directly address some statements made by witnesses for the State of Florida concerning Naval aviation training and other issues. In summary these are:
Pilot training at NAS Oceana meets the Navy's needs - As noted in the depositions, no current military aviatian facility possesses completely optimal training characteristics. Both the 800-foot approach limit and the night time flying hours restrictions at Fentress are, in fact, Navy restrictions that have been made with the full understanding of the entire training experience. The Navy has stated that these are acceptable deviations. One musr also recognize that adjustments are necessary at Cecil, especially when departing Whitehouse, where a pilot makes a right versus left Nm because of encroachment.
The Honorable Anthony J. Principi August 22,2005 Page Two
Quantitative data, not opinions, are critical to assessing the comparison of Oceana and Cecil. What quantitative data are there to support the argument that training at Oceana is in any way inferior or increases risk to aviators?
Air Encroachment Is severe around former Cecil Field - The FAA data are compelling, and indicate that two of the top 10 heaviest air traffic route control activities across the nation are in Florida - Miami (ranked 7) and Jacksonville (ranked 8), with approximately 2.4 million flights each. In the airspace above Cecil, there is far more air congestion than the airspace above Oceana. At Oceana, Navy pilots remain in total Navy air traffic control, regardless of the training mission. At Cecil, Navy pilots would cross multiple FAA main air traffic routes to reach their training ranges. Florida argues that the F&4 would give Navy pilots priority, but they can never guarantee it operationally, especially in bad weather, given the level of air traffic saturation.
What quantitative studies have been provided to the Commission on the impact on the Navy training missions of the documented overall air congestion and air saturation in the skies over former Cecil Field?
Environmental Impact statement (EIS) Process and site remediation cannot be completed with the speed promised by Florida officials -The EIS process is regulated by federal law, mandating certain steps and processes. The introduction of military jets, especially with the level of activity contemplated, will require lengthy and major EIS activities.
Cecil Field remains listed on the National Priorities List as of August 22, 2005, as is shown on the following link www.e~a.govlrerrion4/waste/nr>l/n~lfln~cecnasfl.htm. Several operable units containing numerous specific cleanup sites remain on the National Priorities List as of this writing.
How can Florida promise that it can turn over the base free of environmental problems by the end of the year given the base's continued listing as a Superfund site?
Joint Training Opportunities are Greater at NAS Oceaaa - While there are numerous military installations in Florida, there is not the opportunity for full cross-senice training within a single flying cycle. Oceana possesses significantly greater opportunity for cross-service and joint-training activities with other Navy, Air Force, Marine and Army activities within a single flying cycle. This is due to Oceana's proximity to key operational and command hct ions .
F I LE No .520 68/22 ' 05 15 : 15 I D : COW1 . PREPAREDNESS FkX : 8042253882 PAGE 4/ 28
- .- - .- - -
The Honorable Anthony J. Principi August 22,2005 Page Three
Shouldn't the entire training experience, from "wheels up to wheels down," be part of the comparison between Oceana and the former Cecil Field?
Certified Data on Costs are not available for Cecil - Beyond the sworn deposition, the estimated costs by Florida officials to re-establish operations at the former Cecil Field have almost doubled in the past 10 days. There is no guarantee that the costs will not continue to rise because of the absence of a detailed analysis by independent and knowledgeable officials. There are also no guarantees that timing commitments can be met. The BRAC Commission noted that it had run an independent COBRA analysis that places the costs in the $400 million range, and this differs from the Navy's $1 -6 billion estimate significantly.
While it is reasonable to assume there will be wide variances in costs given the short timeframe for carefkl analysis, who bears the burden if Florida is wrong?
In summary, Mr. Chairman, assertions and promises aside, the wide variance of information, coupled with the absence of critical data, underscores that a decision to close or realign NAS Oceana to a specific site -- going directly against the recommendations of the Department of Defense and the Navy -- can not and should not be made within a limited time window as part of the BRAC process. The Navy should be provided the tools to continue its tangible progress towards long-term Master Jet Base planning and be given the opportunity to develop such a facility on its own timetable.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments. I appreciate your taking the time to consider the Commonwealth's views on this issue.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Mark R. Warner
Cc: The BRAC Commission Members The Honorable John Warner The Honorable George AlIen The Honorable Thelma Drake The Honorable Randy Forbes
answe~ed [I] 5:3 answers (11 5:20 a n t i c i p a t e d [il 5:24 a p p e a r e d (11 10:7 a p p r o a c h e s 111 5;) 6 approval 4:14 a r e a [is1 4:6 4:11
4:21 4:25 5:6 5:17 6:2 7:9
/ . A
aboard 141 6.9 6:lO 612 6:24
above [I] I 0:9 acceptable ti j 7 ~ 2 accommoda te 121 5:s 5 7
accommoda ted [I] 4:12
accompl i sh 111 9:12 accompl ished [I 1 9:6
accura te [I] 10: 13 actual (21 3:3
7:3 - 8:17 8:24
131 3:6 55 a. 1
August [ I ] ]:I2 Aviation 121 2: 18
5 :4 aviators [I) 7:4
a s s o c i a t e d 111 10:15 a t t e s t [I] 723 a t t r ac t ive [ I ) 7:18
-B- backed (11 3.2 BASE 1:I7 Base [i] 8:20 b a ~ e [I] 297 b a t t l e 111 8:4 Beach 121 1:13
10-7
J . L J
ADMIRAL [sl I:] 1 2:l 10:6
Admiral [11 2 2 10:24
~ f f o r d c d [il 9:5 rffords 111 8:23 kil l31 8:12 8:19 8:20
ce r t a in [I] 4:3 c e n j f i e d [i] 9:8 certify [2] 10:s
10:14 Chcnyfl] 8:15 Chief pi 7:20
9:lO children [ I ] 7:13 C i r c u i t [I] 10:4 City [I) 10:4 c l e a r a n c e s [I] 3:19 cleared 111 215 close (11 8:17 closest [I] 6:23 CLOSURE [l) 1: 17 Coast [a] 2 5 4:2 6:23
2:25 3:6 complicates [1]4:25 co rnp rehens jve p i
2:22 4:s S:l concern [I) 9:7 c o n m e d yl 2:14
3:2 3 3 concerns [I] 4:7 c o n d i t i o n s [q 6:15
6:16
:onsiitutes [I] I 0: I 3 ;onstruction [I] 5:16
:onsaltations (11 4:9
con tac t [I] 7:6 contemplating [I] 6:21
con t inua l ly [3] 7:6 8:7 8:14
control (21 3; I 6 4:16
con t ro l l ed 111 3:13 controls [I] 3:24 country [I] 6:6 Coun 111 I O : ~
cr i t ica l [I] 3:8 crucial [I] 2:17 current (21 6:7 6 :9
-D- D [2] 10:2 10:20 D a m 111 8:3 da t a [I] 9:9 dec i s ion [q 2:17 4:17 5:3 921 5:25 9:9 Defense 111 2: 12 9:11
de l ega t ion [i] 2:lS DELIVER [I) 1:16 DELIVERY [ l j 1:17
d e m a n d i n g [I] 6: 13 6:20
D e p a r t m e n t (11 2:12 d e p l o y (11 9:3 described [il 3:16 d e t r i m e n t a l (11 4:3 d i f f e r en t [I] 3:22 d i r ec t ion [ i ] d i v i s i o n (11 210 d o n e [ I ] 5:1 dew (I] 8:15 duly [I] 10:9
-16- East ~31 2:s 4:2 6:23
e d u c a t i o n a l [i] 7:12 EIS 121 2 2 2 2 2 s e n c o u n t e r (1) 6:l6 encroachment r31 4:s 5:22 5:23
encumbered [I] 3:23 end111 7:15
7:13 environmental t11
2:23 essential (1) 9% e s t a b l i s h e d ~ 2 1 5 1 0
512 event (11 1o:16
I excellent p ] 7:10 7:11 7:14 existence [I] 5 1 3 expires (11 1 0 3
F- 15s [i] F-I 8 ti] 5:10 P 1 8 s [ q FAA [o] 3:17 3:24 4:9 4:12 4:16
FAA's [L]
f a c i l i t i e s [q 8:3 8:7
facility [I] facts [i] 3:3 families [il family [3] 1 7:11 7:22 f a r t i ] 4:lO FCLP [I] f cc t [ l ] 3:14 Fentress [ I )
p roc txd ing 111 10:16 p roces s 01 2:24 3:7 6:13
p romises 14) 3:l 3:2 3:4 3:5
p r o p a t y 111 2:21 proposa l [I] 4:23 proven [I] 6:25 p rov ided [i] 7:12 p rox imi ty [I] 8:6 P u b l i c 121 10:2
10;2 1
Given - strike ~ulti-pagem 10:7
Retired [I] 10:24 re t i red 11) 2:2 r e t i r emen t [I] 7: 17 r e tu rn ing [I] 4: 15 risky [119:10 R o a d s [a] 6:2 7:9 7:19 7:25 8:ll 8:14 9:l 9:5
routes 111 5 1 2 RPR 121 10:2 10:20
l a n d i n g (61 2:9 - P.- 6:4 6:8 6:12 never [ I ]
New (11 4:20 n e w [l) 5 1 7 n i g h t [2] 6:l8 n o r [ q 10:15 N o r f o l k 121
1O:16 N o d [l]
no l a r i a l (11
n e e d s [21 2:22 5: 1
N o t a r y (11 I 10:21 n o w [;I 7:2 N o w h e r e (31
4:13 9:6 n o w h e r e n u m b e r
-H- H a m p t o n [q 6:2 ':' 7:19 7:2s
8:11 8:13 9:l 9:s
h a n d (11 10:17 h e a d (11 2:10 h e a l t h (11 7:14 hearrs 3 2 3 4:14
safe[^] 7:12 s a f e l y pl
7:4 s a f e t y (11
S a t u r d a y [ I ]
S c h o o l (11 school [I]
Scott p] 10:2 sea 2:5 seal p] 10:17 Scc re t a ry (11
service [JI 8:lO 8:12
set111 10:s seven [I] S e y m o r c 111 s h i p 191 6:9
6:12 6:16 6:19 6:24 9:4
Signal (11
s i g n a l (21 6:4
skills 111
k j u n e [ i ] 0:16 l i f e [I) 7:19 l i m i t [I] 3: 16 l imi l a t i ons [i] 6:20 live[;] 7:25 L i v i n g [i] 6:2 l onge r ti] 8:21 LSO PI 7:5 LSos 6: 6
I o f f e r [I] 7:) 9 -M- offered (21 7: 1 I
. .
5:20 heard (21 3: 1
3:21 hereby 01 105 he re inbe fo re [il
104 h i g h [I] 7:23 Hornet111 510
qua l i f i ca t ion (11 1 O:3
m a j o r (31 4:17 5:17
2:4
M a r i n e 111 8:)s Mar ines [ l l 8:i6 ma t t e r s t i ] 325 1 officer [I] 6:5 m a x i m u m [I] 5:17 of f icer 121 2:9
1 .1 1
of fe r ing (21 2:19 2:20
offers [41 7:9 7:23 8:4 8:s
qua l i t y [II 7:18 ques t jons p) 4:10 5.2 919
- - 6:4
O f f i c e r s ( I ] 7:24 One[2] 2:9 3:8 ODC[6] 4:l 4:4
7:16 7:21 8:9 8:22
-I - i m p a c t [11 223 i m p o ~ t a ~ l l y (11 8:8 i n c l u d e s 111 3: I 3 i n c r e a s e 111 4:24 i n c r e a s e d 111 4:2 i n t eg ra t e [I] 8:7 i n t eg ra t ed (11 8:21 lntelligence 111 8 5 i n t e r e s t ed 10:16 in t e r f ace (1) 9:2 i s s u e s r21 4:25 5:2
ra ise [i] 7: 13 r ead ines s p] 7:22 7:22
R E A L I G N M E N T [1] ]:I7 REAR [3j 1:11 2:l 10:6
R e a r [2] 2:2 10:24 recognized [I] 4:l
record [I] 7:3 recorded [I] 10:lo r educed 111 10:ll regard (11 8:2 regarding [21 5:2 9:7
m a y [i] 522 m e n 121 7:7 m e n t i o n e d [I]
MET2 2:1 10:6 Metz [212: I m i l e s 111 m i l i t a r y [I ]
m i s s i o n r21 9:12
m i s s i o n s (11
morale [I]
m o v e [I]
m u s t [l) 4: 16
oppor tun i t i e s ti) 1 7:12 o p p o r t u n i t y 121 6:3
7:25 3:24 325 4:6 4:7 4:16
Spec i a l [ z j 8:10 special [i] 8:13 specu la t ion ri] 3:3 specu la t ive 111 9:9 s q u a d r o n s (21 8:4 6:7
o p t i m u m [l] 6:15 option [l] 9:8 O r l a n d o [i] 5:16 o t h e r w i s e 1-21 10:15
10:16 o u t s t a n d i n g (11 8;3
-P- P-3s [I] 4 2 4
party0110:15 p a s s 111 4:21 p a s t [i] 6:3 pa t t e rn (31 6:19 6:20 6:24
P e o p l e [I] 7:lS p e r m i s s i o n 111 3:18 person 111 10% p i l o t s [zl 7.7 7:11
-I- J a c k s o n v i l l e 01
4:24 jobs [i] 2:IO J o h n s o n 11) 8:20 j o i n g 111 8:2 J o i n t (1) 8:2S j o i n t ~ 4 1 8:10 8:22
9:2 9:4 J u l y 11) 10:s
s t a r t ed 111 7:1 STATEMEW [I I
]:I0 s t a t emen t [q 2:23 7:21 1O; lO 10:lO
S l a t e s [I] 2:2 s t a t i oned (11 2:4
s t a t i ons [i] 2:11 stay [I] 6:7 stayjng(11 7:16 s t eno type (11 10: 1 1 strike [I] 8:5
-N- name (11
NAS pl 4:24 6:5
n a t i o n [I]
N a v a l [q 5:3 7:20
N a ~ t l a ~ 2:3 2:ll 2:19 2:20 3:lO 4:5
rc la tcd 111 10: 14 r emember [I ) 3:10 repl ica te [l] 6:lS replicating [i] 6:23
1 4 : I S 4:21
representa t ive (11 2:12
requi red 2:24 3:7 5:9
Index Page 2
-L- lack 111 9% I a n d [ q 2:20 3 1 1
4:16 6:]6 7:4
6:14 6:21 8:22 9:lO
Neck (11 8:3 ned[213:10
F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 19 I D : CONPI. PREPQREDNESS FAX : 8042253882
Fred Metz, Rear A h . , USN Ret. structure 121 3:20 4:12 -w- d . 6
F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 19 I D : COMM . PREPAREDNESS FAX : 8042253882 PAGE 1% 28
FOR
SWORN STATEMENT O F
PHIL GRANDFIELD, CAPTAIN, USN RETIRED
August 2 2 , 2005
V i r g i n i a Beach, Virginia
DELIVER TO:
DELIVERY TO THE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE .-
COMMISSION, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, INC.
F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 19 ID : COMM . PREPAREDNESS FAX : 8042253882 PQGE 20/ 28
CAPTAIN GRANDFIELD: My name is phi1
Grandfield, former naval aviator and retired Navy
captain. I have about 4,000 hours of experience
flying F-148, F-4s, and F-18s. I also have ten years
of experience as a landing signals officer where my
primary responsibility was training naval aviators to
fly aboard the ship and prepare to fly aboard the
ship.
The decision to support the question
about what is best for the Navy and the future of
naval aviation should be the primary focus of the
decision on NAS Oceana or the former NAS Cecil Field.
Foremost, the decision must support quality of
training for F-18 fleet training squadrons and the
fleet squadrons.
Despite the interviews with NAS Oceana
pilots by BRAC commissioners and che articles and the
press quoting disgruntled pilots, NAS Oceana's
location with e a s y access with over-water and
air-to-ground range has provided quality training to
TACAIR pilots for decades.
Despite comments to the contrary, NAS
Oceana's resources continue to provide high-quality
training. There's never been any official Navy
statement referencing degraded training capabilities
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, INC.
FILE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 20 . I D : COfl f l . PREPkREDNESS F kX : 8042253882 PkGE 211 28 .- ..
I
1
As stated before, each field has its own
pluses and minuses. The flight restrictions imposed
by the FAA upon operations at Cecil Field have been a
negative impact for years and will likely get worse a s
air traffic through Florida increases. The expanded
traffic flow into Orlando will likely adversely affect
the use of the Pinecastle bombing range in the future.
On the contrary, NAS Oceanats location
allows much improved synergy to train in accordance
3
before or during the BRAC process, nor is there any
2
3
difference in measured readiness levels of NAS Oceana
squadrons and those based elsewhere.
Fighter squadrons at NAS Oceana need to
train with Navy E-2 squadrons, surface ships, Special
Forces, Marine Corps units at Camp Lejune, and a t MCAS
Cherry Point, as well as active duty Air Force
1 3
14
l9 1 squadrons at Langley Air Force Base.
with the DOD Training Transformation Guidelines,
particularly when compared to Cecil Field.
20 1 This synergy and training extends to
enlisted training a s part of the Navy's Revolution In
Training and Sea Enterprise concept as well as joint
23 1 level training for air crews.
L
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, I N C .
24
25
More and more craining resources are
being collocated in the Hampton Roads area to include
-
F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 20 I D : COMN . PREPAREDNESS FAX : 8042253882 -
PAGE 22/ 28
enlisted and maintenance training.
The System of Systems for training
systems e x t e n d s into Homeland security with combined
area resources for force protection.
This consolidation of training assets in
the fleet concentration center will improve readiness
if NAS Oceana stays here in this area as well.
To emphasize my previous comments with
reference to field carrier landing practice
differences between OLF Whitehouse and OLF Fentress.
I reject the implications that aviators
are at any greater risk when flying aboard an aircraft
carrier if their field carxier landing practice
training was conducted at OLF Fentress, vice OLF
Whitehouse. The pattern differences that exist are
considered acceptable deviations in training and h a v e
served us well in t h e p a s t .
Cecil Commerce Field is only a guess a s
t o who gets hurt if we g u e s s wrong. The Cecil
proposal is immensely speculative and if adopted could
easily impair and degrade the Navy's readiness and
mission capabilities in the future.
We cannot create tomorrow's Navy by
relying on the opinions of yesterday's naval
leadership. The current Navy leadership and the
-
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, INC.
F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 20 I D : COMM . PREPAREDNESS FkX : 3042253882 PkGE 23/ 28
Secretary of Defense have made their decisions crystal
clear: NAS Oceana must not be closed and remains the
best choice for naval aviation training on the East
Coast.
The Navy trains its people for demanding
skills, piloting aircraft, operating nuclear
propulsion on submarines, surface ships, and on and on
as I referred to in the System of Systems.
T h e r e is a n exemplary record of success
t o show how t h i s long-established training syllabus
has worked here at NAS Oceana. There's absolutely no
credible evidence t h a t pilots trained at NAS Oceana
are any less qualified and competent and capable of
those trained anywhere else.
NAS Oceana served us well for decades
with the resources that still exist today.
It's wrong to rely on the biased opinions
of a few disgruntled aviators and disregard and ignore
the informed, honest, and comprehensive statements of
the Chief of Naval Operations.
Only he has knowledge from every level of
command and every u n i t y in his organization concerning
the quality of training and morale of his people. And
the CNO has stated that he prefers to remain at NAS
Oceana.
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, INC.
- - - - -
F I LE No. 520 08/22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2 1
22
23
24
25
--
' 05 15 : 20 I D : COVM. PREPAREDNESS FAX : 6'042253882 PAGE 24/ 28
6 T h e Navy is a n increasingly complex and
interdependent organization and is moving away from
stovepipes formed of military organizations into the
System of Systems that I have described.
Moving a key element s u c h a s NAS Oceana
will h a v e far-reaching, adverse consequences to the
Navy's revolution training as it collocates in Harnpton
Roads.
TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, INC.
F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 21 I D : COMM . PREPAREDNESS FAX:8042253882 PAGE 25/ 28
Aug. 22. 2 0 0 5
:OMMONWEALTH OF V I R G I N I A AT LARGE, to wit:
I, S c o t t D. Gregg, R P R , a N o t a r y Public for
che Commonwealth of V i r g l n i a at Large , of
qualification i n the circuit C o u r t of the City of
l o r f o l k whose commission expires July 31, 2008, do
hereby certify that the w i t h i n person, CAPTAIN P H I L
GRANDFIELD, R E T I R E D , appeared be fore me a t Virginia
Beach, V i r g i n i a , a s hereinbefore s e t forth; and after
b e i n g f i r s t d u l y sworn by me, thereupon made the above
statement; t h a t h i s statement was recorded in
stenotype by me and reduced to t y p e s c r i p t u n d e r my
direction; and that the foregoing transcript
constitute5 a True, a c c u r a t e , and complete transcript,
I f u r t h e r cextify that I am not r e l a t e d to
n o r otherwise associated with any party to this
proceed ing , nor otherwise interested in t h e even t
t h e r e o f . Given under my hand a n d n o t a r i a l seal at
Norfolk, 2005.
S c o t t D. Gregg, RPR
Notary Public
Phil Grandfiela, C p ain, U S N Ret ired u TAYLOE ASSOCIATES, INC.
FILE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 21 I D : COMM . PREPAREDNESS FAX : 8C~42253882 PAGE 26/ 23
F I LE No. 520 08/22 '05 15 : 21 I D :COIN. PREPQREDNESS FAX : $042253882 PAGE 27/ 28
2005 - measured h igb -qua l i t y (11
2:23
-
1
I I I
m
Homeland ti1 4:3 h o n e s t [I] 5 1 9 h o u r s ril 2:3 hurt 111 4:19
Phil Grandfield, Capt., USN Ret. ~ult i -pagew I I 3:I / c o n s t i t u t e s 111 7:13
;
;
,
i
i
I 1 I 1
- -
-F- P ~ ~ S [ I ] 2:4 F - 1 8 p l 2:14 F-I 8s [i] 2:4 F-4s [I] 2:s FAA (11 3:6
2008 7:s l c a m p [ l l 3:17 22 111 ~ : I O c a n n o t 111 4:23
c a p a b l e [!I 5 1 3 CAPTAIN [q 1 :9 2:) 7:6
C a p t a i n [I] 7 : a c a p t a i n [I] 2:3 carrier (31 4:9
i g n o r t [I] 5 1 8 i m m e n s e l y (11 4:20
i m p a c t pi 3:7 i m p a i r [I] 4;21 implications [I] 4:11
imposed ril 3:s i m p r o v e 4:6 i m p r o v c d (11 3:12 i n c l u d e (11 3:2S i n c r e a s e r t11 3:8
f a r - r e a c h i n g [I] 6:6 Fentress 4:14
fewp] 5:18 Field [q 2 9 2 3:14 4:18
f i e l d (31 3:4 4:13
Fighter [i)
first 111 7:9 fleelp] 2:14 4:6
flight [ I )
F l o r i d a [I]
flow [I] 3:9 fly [q 2:7 flying PI
4:12 focus [I]
Force (21 3:19
f o r c e (11 4:4
Forces [I I foregoing (11 Foremost [I]
f o r m e d iorme~ 12)
2:12 forth [I] 7:8 future (3)
3:10 4:22
. . -A- 4:13 4:13
Cecil (51 2,12 3:6 3:14 4:18
a b o a r d r31 2:7 2:7 4:12
above (11 7:9 a b s o l u t e l y (11 5:) I acceptable 111 4:16 a c c e s s [i] 2:19 a c c o r d a n c e [I] 3:12 a c c u r a t e [I] 7:13 a c t i v e [I] 3:18 a d o p t e d [i] 4:20 a d v e r s e [I] 6:6 adversely (11 3:9 a f f e c t [I] 3:9 Gir t21 3:IR 3:19
d e c i s i o n (31 2:9 2:12 2:13
d e c i s i o n s [I] s:1 D e f e n s c (11 S:I d e g r a d e 111 s:21 d e g r a d e d 111 2:25 DELIVER 111 1 :14 DELlVERY (11
):I5 d e m a n d i n g 111 5:s d e s c r i b e d 6:s
Cherry [11 3:18 C h i e f [I] 5:20 c h o i c e [I] 5;3 Circuit 111 7:4 City [ I ] 7:4 c l e a r [ I ] 5:2 c l o s e d [I] 5:2 CLOSUE [I j ]:I5 CNO (11 5:24 C o a s t [I] 5 :4 c o l l o c a t e d (11 3:25 c o l l o c a t e s (1 j 6:7 c o m b i n e d [I] 4:3 c o m m a n d [ I ] 5:22 c o m m e n t s (2) 2%
4:s
Commerce (11 4:18 COMMISSION (11
1:16 c o m m i s s i o n 11]7:5 commr'ssioners [I]
i n f o r m e d [I] s:19 i n t e r d e p e n d e n t [I] 6:2
i n t c n s t t d (11 7:16 i n t e r v i e w s 111 2 9 6
. ~
Despite p] 2: 16 -J- joint [I) 3:22 July [,I 7:s
air (21 3:E 3:23 a i r - to -ground (11 2:20
d e v i a t i o n s ri) 4:16 d i f f e r e n c e [I] 3:2 d i f f e r e n c e s [21 4:10
4:)s d i r ec t i on [I] 7:12 d i s g r u n t l e d [q 2:18
5:16 d i s r e g a r d (11 5: le DOD [I] 3:13 duly [11 7:9 d u r i n g (11 3:l duty [I] 3:IE
a i r c r a f t (21 4: 12 5:6
key (11 6:s k n o w l e d g e (11 9 2 1
B ~ ~ O W S [I] 3:12 appeared 11) 7:7 a k a 3:2S 4:4
4 9 ARLINGTON [I 1
1:16 a r i i c l e s [I] 2: 17 assets (11 4:5 a s soc i a t ed 111 7:15 august[^] 1:10
l a n d i n g p l 4:9 4:13
Langley [I]
LARGE [I]
Large P I l e a d e r s h i p [zl
4:25 Ixjuoe 111 l e s s (11 5 1 3 level PI 3:23 levels r u
-G Given [I] 7:17 GIZANDFrELD (31
1:9 2:1 7:7 G r a n d f i e l d (21 2:2 7:24
g r e a t e r [ I ] 4:12
-E- E-2 111 3:16 easily 111 4:21 East (11 5:3 easy (11 2: 19 e l e m e n t 11 j 6:s elsewhere 111 3:3 e m p h a s i z e (11 4:s e n l i s t e d (21 3:21
4: 1 E n t e r p r i s e [I] 3;22 e v e n t (11 7:16 e v i d e n c e [I] 5 1 2 exemplary [I ] 5:9 ex i s t p ]4 :15 5 1 6 e x p a n d e d (I 1 3:6
111 7:1 C o m m o n w e a l t h (11 7:3
c o m p a r e d [ I ] 3:14 c o m p e t e n t [I] 5 : I 3 c o m p l e t e t i ] 11 3
a v i a t i o n p] 2:1 I 5 3
av i a lo r [I] 2:2 av i a to r s p] 2:6 4:11 $:I8
a w a y [1]6:2 likely i2; 3 :9
l o ca t i on p] 2:19 3:11
l ong -e s t ab l i shed (11 5 1 0
-B- BASE (11 1 : Base [I] 3:19 9ased 111 3:3 B e a c h [21 I:] 1 7:8
best (31 210 5:3 b e t w e e n [I] 4:10 biased [I] 5:17
b o m b i n g 111 3:10 BRACp) 2:17
guess p] 4:18 4:19
G u i d e l i n e s [i] 3: 13
complex (11 6:1 c o m p r e h e n s i v e (11
5:19 c o n c e n t r a t i o n (11
4:6 c o n c e p t (11 3:22 c o n c e r n j n g [ l 5:22 c o n d u c t e d r11 4:14 c o n s e q u e n c e s [I]
6:6 c o n s i d m d r11 4:16 c o n s o l i d a t i o n 111
4 5
H a m p t o n 121 3:25 6:7 majntcnanu: 11)
4: 1 M a r j n c r i l 3:17 MCAS [I] 3:17 measured [I I 3:2
h a n d 7;17 hereby (11 7:6 h e r e i o b e i o r c [I] 7 3
Index Page I
-- FAX:8042253882 PAGE 2% 28 F I LE No. 520 08/22 ' 05 15 : 21 I D : COMM . PREPAREDNESS
~ulti-pageTU r e l y i n g (11 4;24 remain [I] 5:24
Phil Grandfield, Capt., USN Ret.
I S:8 6:4 systems [I] 4:3
r e m a i n s [I] 5:2 -T-
TACAlR [I] 2:21 tent11 2:4 t hc r co f [I] 7: 17 t he r eupon 7:9 Lhroagh [I] 3:s t o d a y (11 5: 16 t o m o r r o w ' s [I] 4:23 traffic 121 3:8 3 :9
[ ra in PI 3: 12 3: 16 t ra ined [z1 5: 12 514
resources [4] 2:23 3:24 4:4 216
res o n s i b i l i t y (11 2: i'
n s t r j c t i o n s [I I 3:5 RETIRED r21 1:9
7:7 I people 121 5:s -N- / 5 9 3
p e r s o n [I] 7:6 PHIL 121 1 :9
7:6 Ph i l 121 2: 1 7:24 p i l o t i n g [ i j 5 6
Re t i r ed ti 1 7:24 retired p l 2:2 R e v o l u t i o n [I] 3:21 r evo lu t j on [I] 6:7 r iSk[l] 4:12 R o a d s [q 3:25
6:8 RPR [a] 7:2 7:20
pilots [.UI 2:18 2:21
P i n e c a s t l e [I]
p l u s c s [I ] P o i n t [I 1 practice r q
4:13 p r e f e r s prepare 11 press [l] 218 p r e v i o u s [I]
T r a i n i n g pl 3:13 3:22
t ra in ing (191 2:6 2:14 2:14 2;20 2:24 2:25 3:20 3:21 3:23 3:24 4:l 4:2 4:s 4:14 4:16 5:3 5:lO 5:23 6:7
trains [I] 5 5
-S- Scott [2 ) 7:2 7:20 Sea[ i l 3:22 seal rll 7:17 Secretary 11) 5 : I security [q 4:3 s e rved pi 4:17 5:15
se t [I] 7:8 ship (21 2:7 2:8 s h i p s [2) 3: I 6 5:7 s h o w [I] 5:10 s i gna l s [ I ] 2 3 sk i l l s [I] 5:6 Special [I] 3: 16 specu l a t i ve (11 4:20
Navy's r q 1 4:21 6:7 n e e d ( I ] 3:lS n e g a t i v e [ I ]
n e v e r (1 1 DOr[3) 3:l
7:16 N o r f o l k p]
7: 18 n o l a r i a l (11 Notary 121
7:21
t ranscr ip t (21 7:12 7: 13
p r o c e e d i n g [I] 7:16 processpj 3;l p r o p o s a l [i] 4:20 p r o p u l s i o n [I) 5:7 p ro t ec t i on 111 4:4 p r o v i d e [l) 2:23 p ~ o v i d e d [I] 2:20 P u b l i c (21 7:2
7:21
true [ l ] 713 typescr ip t [I] 7;ll
I -0- - - q u a l i f i c a t i o n (11 7:4
3:16 3:19 STATEMENT [I] 1 :8
;talement p] 2:25 7:lO 7:lO
i i a t emen t s (11 5 : 19 itays (1) 4:7 ;motype[l] 7:11 frill 111 !?I6 ; t ovep ipe s 111 6:3 ;ubmarines [I] $9 u c c e s s (11 5:9 iuchr i l 6:s
O c e a n a 11 11 212 2:16 3:2 3:15 4:7 5:2 5:11 5:12 5:15 5:25 6:5
Oceana's (31 2: 18 2:23 3:11
o f f i c e r [ i ] 2:5 official [ I ] 2:24 OLFl414:IO 4:10
4;14 4:14 o p e r a t i n g [I] 5 6 O p e r a t i o n s (11 520 o p e r a t i o n s 111 3:a
q u a l i f i e d [I] 5 1 3 quality 191 2:13 2:20 5:23
q u o t i ~ g [I] 2:ls
r e a d i n e s s p] 3:2 4:6 4:21 REALIGNMENT [I 1
1:IS record [I I 5:9 r e co rded [I] 7:10 r educed (11 7:l I r e f e r ence (1 1 4:9
Vh i t chouse p14:10 4:15 wit [I] 7:) v i th in 111 7;6 vo rked [I] 5:11 worse (11 3:7
o p i n i o n s [q 4:24 I ;;I7 o r g a n i z a t i o n [q
5:22 6:2
O r l a n d o [I] 3:9 o t h e n v i s e p ) 7:15
7:16 o v e r - w a t e r [I) 2:19 own [1] 3:4
S y s t e m r q 4.2 5:8 6:4
S y s t e m s [q 4:2 I 1
Index Page 2
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: August 22,2005
PLEASE DEILIVER THE FOLLOWING 1 5 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
TO: Bill Fetzer Senior Analyst Navy Team
FAX: 703-699-2735
FROM: Governor Jeb Bush Executive Office of the Governor
MESSAGE: Attached is a copy of Florida's comprehensive proposal to reopen Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field. The original document is being sent via Federal Express to arrive tomorrow morning, Tuesday, August 23,2005.